Literatura académica sobre el tema "Utilitarian moral reasoning"
Crea una cita precisa en los estilos APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard y otros
Consulte las listas temáticas de artículos, libros, tesis, actas de conferencias y otras fuentes académicas sobre el tema "Utilitarian moral reasoning".
Junto a cada fuente en la lista de referencias hay un botón "Agregar a la bibliografía". Pulsa este botón, y generaremos automáticamente la referencia bibliográfica para la obra elegida en el estilo de cita que necesites: APA, MLA, Harvard, Vancouver, Chicago, etc.
También puede descargar el texto completo de la publicación académica en formato pdf y leer en línea su resumen siempre que esté disponible en los metadatos.
Artículos de revistas sobre el tema "Utilitarian moral reasoning"
AGAR, NICHOLAS. "Moral Bioenhancement and the Utilitarian Catastrophe". Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 24, n.º 1 (4 de diciembre de 2014): 37–47. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0963180114000280.
Texto completoThomas, Bradley C., Katie E. Croft y Daniel Tranel. "Harming Kin to Save Strangers: Further Evidence for Abnormally Utilitarian Moral Judgments after Ventromedial Prefrontal Damage". Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 23, n.º 9 (septiembre de 2011): 2186–96. http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2010.21591.
Texto completoSerafimova, Silviya. "Moral Challenges for Bauer’s Project of a Two-level Utilitarian AMA". Balkan Journal of Philosophy 14, n.º 2 (2022): 115–26. http://dx.doi.org/10.5840/bjp202214215.
Texto completoMartin, Rose, Petko Kusev, Joseph Teal, Victoria Baranova y Bruce Rigal. "Moral Decision Making: From Bentham to Veil of Ignorance via Perspective Taking Accessibility". Behavioral Sciences 11, n.º 5 (1 de mayo de 2021): 66. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/bs11050066.
Texto completoAcevedo-Triana, César A., Juan Francisco Muñoz Olano y Pablo Reyes. "Differences on Utilitarian and Moral Decision Between Male and Female". Pensamiento Psicológico 17, n.º 1 (23 de marzo de 2019): 45–60. http://dx.doi.org/10.11144/javerianacali.ppsi17-1.dumd.
Texto completoDobrijevic, Aleksandar. ""Critique of intuitive reason"". Filozofija i drustvo, n.º 26 (2005): 179–226. http://dx.doi.org/10.2298/fid0526179d.
Texto completoJaquet, François y Florian Cova. "Beyond moral dilemmas: The role of reasoning in five categories of utilitarian judgment". Cognition 209 (abril de 2021): 104572. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104572.
Texto completoHuang, Karen, Joshua D. Greene y Max Bazerman. "Veil-of-ignorance reasoning favors the greater good". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 116, n.º 48 (12 de noviembre de 2019): 23989–95. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1910125116.
Texto completoNemzer, E. A. y L. G. Borodina. "Features of Relationship between Moral Judgments and Mental Model (on the Example of Adults with ASD)". Psychology and Law 12, n.º 1 (2022): 180–95. http://dx.doi.org/10.17759/psylaw.2022120114.
Texto completoHardin, Russell. "Deterrence and Moral Theory". Canadian Journal of Philosophy Supplementary Volume 12 (1986): 161–93. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00455091.1986.10717158.
Texto completoTesis sobre el tema "Utilitarian moral reasoning"
Kuo, Chi-Ting y 郭紀廷. "The study of college students’ moral reasoning on utilitarian v. justice dilemmas and exploration of its correlates". Thesis, 2016. http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/60442342944260221509.
Texto completo國立臺南大學
教育學系測驗統計碩博士班
104
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the psychometric characteristics of utilitarian v. justice scale, and assess the current status of the moral reasoning of students on utilitarian and justice dilemmas based on daily life scenarios. In addition, the consistency of moral judgments made from different standpoints including impartial and situated conditions will also be evaluated. Furthermore, the effect of different background variables on the scores of utilitarian v. justice scale will also be explored. The principle of utilitarianism is to maximize the collective utility so that the differences between benefits and costs are optimized. By contrast, the principle of justice emphasizes that the basic rights of individuals should be protected even in face of tremendous majority utility. The empirical data revealed that college students in general tend to be more utilitarian-oriented in terms of overall performance on the utilitarian v. justice scale. Whether subjects will make utilitarian or justice response may depend on the scale and amount of utility and the nature of basic rights involved in the dilemmas. Subjects tended to make more justice-oriented response when they are in the impartial or objective condition. In contrast, subjects tended to make more utilitarian-oriented response when they are situated in the standpoint of decision makers. Gender, education, partisan orientation, and engagement in civil activities were the important background variables which are significantly correlated with the scores on the utilitarian v. justice scale.
Libros sobre el tema "Utilitarian moral reasoning"
van Prooijen, Jan-Willem. Reason or Intuition? Oxford University Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190609979.003.0003.
Texto completoBesson, Samantha. Human Rights in Relation. Oxford University Press, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198795957.003.0002.
Texto completoCapítulos de libros sobre el tema "Utilitarian moral reasoning"
Gerrits, Jeroen. "Conflicting Modes of Moral Reasoning; The Case of 24". En 24 heures chrono, naissance du genre sécuritaire ? Librairie Philosophique J. Vrin, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.53984/philoseries08299.
Texto completoSalvano-Pardieu, Veronique, Leïla Oubrahim y Steve Kilpatrick. "Cognitive Structure of Moral Reasoning, Development, and Evolution With Age and Pathology". En Advances in Religious and Cultural Studies, 30–57. IGI Global, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-1811-3.ch002.
Texto completoPostema, Gerald J. "Publicity and the Development of Bentham’s Theory of Value". En Utility, Publicity, and Law, 72–93. Oxford University Press, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198793175.003.0004.
Texto completoFrunza, Ana. "Philosophical Grounding of Ethics Expertise". En Ethical Issues in Social Work Practice, 1–17. IGI Global, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-3090-9.ch001.
Texto completoSverdlik, Steven. "Bentham’s Chapter IV". En Bentham's An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation, C4—C4P62. Oxford University Press, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190089900.003.0005.
Texto completo