Literatura académica sobre el tema "Transcranial direct current stimulation"

Crea una cita precisa en los estilos APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard y otros

Elija tipo de fuente:

Consulte las listas temáticas de artículos, libros, tesis, actas de conferencias y otras fuentes académicas sobre el tema "Transcranial direct current stimulation".

Junto a cada fuente en la lista de referencias hay un botón "Agregar a la bibliografía". Pulsa este botón, y generaremos automáticamente la referencia bibliográfica para la obra elegida en el estilo de cita que necesites: APA, MLA, Harvard, Vancouver, Chicago, etc.

También puede descargar el texto completo de la publicación académica en formato pdf y leer en línea su resumen siempre que esté disponible en los metadatos.

Artículos de revistas sobre el tema "Transcranial direct current stimulation"

1

Fregni, F., P. S. Boggio, M. Nitsche y A. Pascual-Leone. "Transcranial direct current stimulation". British Journal of Psychiatry 186, n.º 5 (mayo de 2005): 446–47. http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/bjp.186.5.446.

Texto completo
Los estilos APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
2

Kenney-Jung, Daniel L., Caren J. Blacker, Deniz Doruk Camsari, Jonathan C. Lee y Charles P. Lewis. "Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation". Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Clinics of North America 28, n.º 1 (enero de 2019): 53–60. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chc.2018.07.008.

Texto completo
Los estilos APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
3

Cabral, Maria E., Adriana Baltar, Rebeka Borba, Silvana Galvão, Luciana Santos, Felipe Fregni y Kátia Monte-Silva. "Transcranial direct current stimulation". NeuroReport 26, n.º 11 (agosto de 2015): 618–22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/wnr.0000000000000397.

Texto completo
Los estilos APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
4

Ilic, T. V. "Transcranial direct current stimulation". Clinical Neurophysiology 119, n.º 3 (marzo de 2008): e68. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2007.11.019.

Texto completo
Los estilos APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
5

Kittaka, Chiharu, Toshiyuki Moriyama, Hideaki Itoh y Satoru Saeki. "Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation/Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation(tACS/tDCS)". Japanese Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine 59, n.º 5 (18 de mayo de 2022): 456–60. http://dx.doi.org/10.2490/jjrmc.59.456.

Texto completo
Los estilos APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
6

Ahmed, Gehan M. "Effect of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Gait of Stroke Patients". Journal of Medical Science And clinical Research 05, n.º 01 (10 de enero de 2017): 15466–72. http://dx.doi.org/10.18535/jmscr/v5i1.45.

Texto completo
Los estilos APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
7

Kislitskiy, V. M., E. A. Yatsenko, E. U. Vetchinkina y D. V. Litvinov. "EFFECTS OF TRANSCRANIAL DIRECT CURRENT STIMULATION ON ATTENTION IN HEALTHY PEOPLE". Amur Medical Journal, n.º 4 (2017): 100. http://dx.doi.org/10.22448/amj.2017.4.100-100.

Texto completo
Los estilos APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
8

Priori, Alberto, Mark Hallett y John C. Rothwell. "Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation or transcranial direct current stimulation?" Brain Stimulation 2, n.º 4 (octubre de 2009): 241–45. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2009.02.004.

Texto completo
Los estilos APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
9

Eryilmaz, Gul, Husnu Erkmen y Isil Gogcegoz. "Transcranial direct current stimulation treatment". Anatolian Journal of Psychiatry 16, n.º 2 (2015): 138. http://dx.doi.org/10.5455/apd.45344.

Texto completo
Los estilos APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
10

Saleem, Yusra, Komal . y Stephen Riaz. "Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (TDCS)." International Journal of Endorsing Health Science Research (IJEHSR) 10, n.º 4 (25 de noviembre de 2022): 441–45. http://dx.doi.org/10.29052/ijehsr.v10.i4.2022.441-445.

Texto completo
Resumen
Transcranial direct current stimulation (TDCS) is a neuromodulatory device that is used for its ability to enhance cognitive and behavioral performance. Human studies suggest that TDCS modulates cortical excitability during stimulation by nonsynaptic changes of the cells, along with evidence that the after-effects of TDCS are driven by synaptic modification. TDCS represents a potential intervention to enhance cognition across clinical populations, including mild cognitive impairment among psychological and neurological disorders. Studies suggest that TDCS might be helpful in treating depression with appropriate current, size of electrodes, and employment of montages. TDCS opens a new perspective in treating major depressive disorder (MDD) because of its ability to modulate cortical excitability and induce long-lasting effects.
Los estilos APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.

Tesis sobre el tema "Transcranial direct current stimulation"

1

Chesters, Jennifer. "Enhancing speech fluency using transcranial direct current stimulation". Thesis, University of Oxford, 2016. https://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:79459ff6-975f-4bd9-8679-1290b20da8b8.

Texto completo
Resumen
Producing speech is a highly complex task, involving the integration of sensory and linguistic information, with the precise, high-speed, co-ordination of muscles controlling breathing and the movement of the vocal folds and articulators. In spite of this complexity, producing fluent speech - moving smoothly from one speech sound to the next - can appear effortless. Speech fluency is highly socially valued, and the personal and societal costs of living with a disorder of fluency, such as developmental stuttering, are considerable. The outcomes of behavioural therapies to increase fluency are limited, however, especially for those seeking treatment in adulthood. The overarching aim of this thesis was to investigate how anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (A-TDCS) can be used to increase speech fluency, with a particular focus on the potential application to developmental stuttering. A-TDCS is a noninvasive brain stimulation technique that can enhance the effects of motor, speech, and language training. First, in a series of single-session experiments in typically fluent speakers, I demonstrated that applying A-TDCS over the left IFC increased speech motor learning relative to a sham control, but did not improve consolidation of this learning (chapter 2). Furthermore, I found that neither increasing stimulation intensity from 1 mA to 2 mA, nor changing from a unihemispheric to a bihemispheric configuration, had an additional effect on learning. Next, in single-session study with adults who stutter, I assessed the feasibility of using A-TDCS to improve fluency (chapter 3). Fluency was temporarily induced, by speaking in unison with another person, but the concurrent application of 1-mA unihemispheric A-TDCS over left inferior frontal cortex did not significantly prolong this fluency. Nevertheless, a trend towards stuttering reduction gave some indication that fluency might be increased using a multiple-session approach. Furthermore, I gained a number of important insights from these single-session studies, which I used to inform the design of the final multiple-session trial. In this final study, I completed a randomised controlled trial in 30 adult males with moderate to severe stuttering. Participants were randomized to receive either 1-mA A-TDCS or sham stimulation over left inferior frontal cortex combined with temporary fluency inducing behavioural techniques, for 20 minutes a day over 5 days (chapter 4). A-TDCS significantly reduced disfluency for at least 5 weeks following this intervention. The effect was specific to the speech impairment of development stuttering, as measures of the psycho-social consequences of stuttering were not modulated by A-TDCS. The findings of these studies offer significant promise for the future application of non-invasive stimulation as an adjunctive therapy for adults who stutter. In the concluding chapter, I discuss the important implications of my findings for the future use of this technique.
Los estilos APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
2

Bridges, Nathaniel Reese. "Predicting Vigilance Performance Under Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation". Wright State University / OhioLINK, 2011. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=wright1309616451.

Texto completo
Los estilos APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
3

Dyke, Katherine. "Investigating transcranial direct current stimulation and its therapeutic potential". Thesis, University of Nottingham, 2017. http://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/41642/.

Texto completo
Resumen
Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a popular non-invasive brain stimulation technique, which has the potential to modulate cortical excitability. The effects of tDCS are known to outlast the stimulation period, and in some cases, repeated applications have been found to produce long lasting clinically relevant effects. The primary aim of this thesis was to explore the reliability and therapeutic potential of this technique. In Chapters 3 and 4 transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) was used to measure tDCS effects. These experiments revealed substantial variability regarding the way in which healthy adults responded to stimulation. Notably, there were differences between participants regarding the direction and magnitude of change in cortical excitability. Furthermore, even when group level effects were found reliably, there was substantial intra-subject variability across repeated testing sessions. Subsequent experiments in Chapters 5 and 6, explored the biological and behavioural effects of tDCS in individuals with Gille de la Tourette’s syndrome (GTS). GTS is a neurodevelopmental disorder characterised by motor and phonic tics which have been linked to hyper excitability within motor-cortical regions. Therefore, these experiments aimed to reduce cortical excitability of targeted regions in the hope that this would impact on tics. Disappointingly, no such effects were found immediately after a single session of tDCS (Chapter 5). Consequently, it was hypothesised that repeated applications may be necessary for significant reductions in tics to occur. This was investigated in Chapter 6 using an in-depth case study. The results were encouraging, in particular there was a substantial drop in tics following 10 days of tDCS at 1.5mA intensity. The stimulation was well tolerated and the treatment regimens were closely adhered to, despite tDCS being delivered in the participants own home with remote supervision. A weaker stimulation intensity was not as effective. The findings of Chapters 3-6 highlight that the optimal stimulation parameters may vary from person to person, and that exploration of individual data is critical in therapeutic contexts. The results also suggest that tDCS may be helpful as a treatment for GTS and furthermore highlight the feasibility of home use stimulation.
Los estilos APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
4

Javadi, Arjomand A. H. "Memory modulation by offline consolidation and transcranial direct current stimulation". Thesis, University College London (University of London), 2011. http://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/1306720/.

Texto completo
Resumen
Two groups of experiments are discussed in this thesis, (a) procedural memory consolidation during sleep and wakefulness, to study the contribution of emotion in consolidation of procedural skill learning, and (b) memory modulation using electrical brain stimulation, to study the effects of long‐ and short‐duration stimulation of left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) on verbal episodic memory. Memory consolidation; The first study showed that participants who were trained in a mirror tracing task with negative emotional stimuli benefited more compared to the participants who were trained with neutral or positive emotional stimuli. The second experiment aimed to investigate the modulatory effect of stimuli with emotional content in a modified serial reaction time task (SRTT). This experiment failed to achieve any main effect of emotional content, retention type, their interaction or their interaction with session number. The only significant effect was found for the session number in which participants showed significantly higher performance in the second session. It is more likely that this outcome is due to the training effects over blocks. Brain stimulation; The first study showed that 20min anodal stimulation enhanced memory performance while the stimulation was delivered during the encoding phase, 20min cathodal stimulation impaired memory performance for the words that were encoded prior to the stimulation and impaired the recognition performance while it was delivered during the testing phase. The second study was similar to the first experiment with the exception that stimulation was delivered for 1.6s for each presented word in three different conditions: no stimulation, early‐stimulation and late‐stimulation. Results showed that early stimulation has significantly stronger effects on the memory performance of the participants compared to nostimulation and late‐stimulation in both anodal and cathodal stimulation types. Results also showed that early anodal stimulation enhanced the memory performance and early cathodal stimulation impaired the memory performance.
Los estilos APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
5

Angius, Luca. "The effect of transcranial direct current stimulation on exercise performance". Thesis, University of Kent, 2015. https://kar.kent.ac.uk/56645/.

Texto completo
Resumen
The physical limits of the human being have been the object of study for a considerable time. Human and exercise physiology, in combination with multiple other related disciplines, studied the function of the organs and their relationship during exercise. When studying the mechanisms causing the limits of the human body, most of the research has focused on the locomotor muscles, lungs and heart. Therefore, it is not surprising that the limit of the performance has predominantly been explained at a "peripheral" level. Many studies have successfully demonstrated how performance can be improved (or not) by manipulating a "peripheral" parameter. However, in most cases it is the brain that regulates and integrates these physiological functions, and much of the contemporary literature has ignored its potential role in exercise performance. This may be because moderating brain function is fraught with difficulty, and challenging to measure. However, with the recent introduction and development of new non-invasive devices, the knowledge regarding the behaviour of the central nervous system during exercise can be advanced. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) are two such methods. These methods can transiently moderate the activity of a targeted brain area, potentially altering the regulation of a particular physiological (or psychological) system, and consequently eliciting a change in exercise performance. Despite the promising theory, there is little or no experimental data regarding the potential to moderate neurophysiological mechanisms through tDCS to improve exercise performance. Consequently, the experiments performed as part of this thesis investigated the capacity for tDCS to alter physical performance. The ability of tDCS as a targeted and selective intervention at the brain level provides the unique opportunity to reduce many methodological constraints that might limit or confound understanding regarding some of the key physiological mechanisms during exercise. Therefore, the primary aim of this thesis was to investigate how tDCS may moderate both central and peripheral neurophysiological mechanisms, and how this may effect various exercise tasks. The first study investigated the effect of a well-documented analgesic tDCS montage on exercise-induced muscle pain. This study demonstrated for the first time, that although anodal tDCS of the motor cortex (M1) reduces pain in a cold pressor task, it does not elicit any reduction in exercise-induced muscle pain and consequently has no effect on exercise performance. As reductions in exercise-induced pain have previously been documented to improve performance, probably the lack of effect was due to either the M1 having a limited processing role in exercise-induced pain, or that the cathodal stimulation of the prefrontal cortex negated any positive impact of anodal M1 stimulation. Given the lack of guidelines for tDCS electrode montage for exercise, the second study examined the effect of different electrode montages on isometric performance and the neuromuscular response of knee extensor muscle. Given that the anode increases excitability and the cathode decreases excitability, the placement of these has the potential to elicit significant effects on exercise performance. The results showed that exercise performance improved only when an extrachepalic tDCS montage was applied to the M1, but in the absence of changes to the measured neuromuscular parameters. These results suggest that tDCS can have a positive effect on single limb submaximal exercise, but not on maximal muscle contraction. The improvement in performance was probably the consequence of the reduction in perceived exertion for a given load. This is the first experiment showing an improvement in exercise performance on single joint exercise of the lower limbs following tDCS. The results suggest that the extrachepalic set-up is recommended for exercise studies in order to avoid any potential negative effect of the cathodal electrode. Previous studies investigating tDCS have shown its potential to alter autonomic activity, and in some circumstances reduce the cardiovascular response during exercise. Considering the emerging studies and applications of tDCS on exercise and the potential benefits of tDCS in the treatment of cardiovascular diseases, the third study monitored multiple cardiovascular variables following tDCS in a group of healthy volunteers. Using more advanced techniques and methods compared to previous research, including the post exercise ischemia technique and transthoracic bioimpedance, the results suggest that tDCS administration has no significant effect on the cardiovascular response in healthy individuals. The final study sought to apply the findings obtained in the study 2 to whole body exercise. The same extrachepalic set up was applied over both the motor cortices, with both anodal and cathodal stimulation conditions. The neuromuscular response and cycling performance was also monitored. Following anodal tDCS, time to exhaustion and motor cortex excitability of lower limbs increased. Interestingly, cathodal stimulation did not induce any change in cycling performance or neuromuscular response. This study demonstrated for the first time the ability of anodal tDCS to improve performance of a constant load cycling task, and highlights the inability of cathodal tDCS to decrease cortical activation during muscle contraction. Taken together, the experiments performed as part of this thesis provide new insights on how brain stimulation influences exercise performance, with notable findings regarding the role of M1 excitability and perception of effort. Furthermore, considering the lack of knowledge regarding the use of tDCS on exercise, these findings will help further understanding of how to apply tDCS in exercise science. This consequently improves the knowledge base regarding the effect of tDCS on exercise and provides both a methodological and theoretical foundation on which future research can be based.
Los estilos APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
6

Fleming, Melanie Kate. "Neuromodulation with transcranial direct current stimulation : the influence of electrode arrangement". Thesis, King's College London (University of London), 2017. https://kclpure.kcl.ac.uk/portal/en/theses/neuromodulation-with-transcranial-direct-current-stimulation(3554a8bf-0435-4925-9d83-99d35811ae25).html.

Texto completo
Resumen
Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) could improve plasticity and motor function, but the influence of electrode arrangement is unclear. The aim of this PhD was to develop and utilise a sequential learning paradigm involving gross movements of the hand to assess the effect of tDCS electrode arrangement on; i) motor sequence learning in healthy young and older adults, ii) motor sequence learning and upper limb function in chronic stroke survivors and iii) retention of learning in healthy adults, and to determine whether the response to tDCS is dependent on changes in transcallosal inhibition (TCI). Study one tested the motor sequence learning paradigm. Young adults, stroke survivors and age-matched controls all demonstrated improvements in motor preparation with 25 repetitions of a movement sequence. However, stroke survivors showed impaired sequence specific learning. Study two demonstrated that healthy ageing was associated with reduced motor sequence learning, but tDCS did not affect performance for either younger or older adults. Bihemispheric tDCS led to an increase in TCI (ipsilateral silent period duration) for the younger group only. There were no significant relationships between changes in TCI and learning. Study three demonstrated a significant effect of tDCS electrode arrangement on upper limb function in stroke survivors, with improvements after unilateral tDCS (anodal or cathodal), but not after bihemispheric. However, there was no effect of tDCS on motor sequence learning or the change in TCI from either hemisphere. Study four showed no effect of tDCS on 48 hour retention of learning for healthy adults. However, cathodal tDCS delivered during training impaired later re-learning of the movement sequence. The findings of these studies suggest that tDCS does not improve learning of a sequence of gross hand movements. High variability in response is observed and there is no consistent effect of tDCS on TCI.
Los estilos APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
7

Tsovilis, Ekaterini. "Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation: A potential treatment for chronic pain". Thesis, Tsovilis, Ekaterini (2019) Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation: A potential treatment for chronic pain. Honours thesis, Murdoch University, 2019. https://researchrepository.murdoch.edu.au/id/eprint/55032/.

Texto completo
Resumen
Purpose: Current treatments available for chronic pain either do not provide patients with adequate pain relief, are invasive, expensive or cause negative side effects. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) delivered to the primary motor cortex (M1) and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) brain regions has been identified as a potential treatment. However, the literature regarding is effectiveness is mixed. This study aimed to clarify if tDCS at M1 and DLPFC reduces healthy participants’ pain. In addition, it aimed to identify whether simultaneous stimulation of M1 and DLPFC results in greater pain reduction than stimulation at one cortical site alone. Method: A randomized, crossover, within-subjects, double-blinded sham controlled design was utilized. Twenty healthy participants (10 female; aged 18 to 59) underwent four conditions, 20 minutes of 1 mA anodal tDCS at M1 and DLPFC concurrently, M1, DLPFC and sham. A low-frequency electrical current administered to participants’ right volar forearm induced pain. Pain was assessed pre and post tDCS by pain ratings to pinprick and the electrical current level required during electrical stimulation to induce moderate level pain. Results: Analysis revealed a significant difference between pre and post tDCS pain assessment, however, this difference was present irrespective of tDCS condition. Participant habituation to low-frequency electrical stimulation may explain these results. Conclusions: TDCS within this study did not reduce healthy participants’ pain. This study identified methodological considerations and tDCS parameters that should be implemented in future replication studies to further explore tDCS as a potential chronic pain treatment.
Los estilos APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
8

Feredoes, Eva Psychiatry Faculty of Medicine UNSW. "Investigating the neural correlates of higher cognitive functions in humans using transcranial magnetic stimulation and transcranial direct current stimulation". Awarded by:University of New South Wales. Psychiatry, 2005. http://handle.unsw.edu.au/1959.4/23460.

Texto completo
Resumen
An important aspect of cognitive neuroscience is to localise specific brain regions involved in cognitive tasks, and to determine the mediating brain processes. There are several investigative approaches towards this, but amongst them, only transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is able to interfere with the brain in such a way as to show the critical involvement of a brain region in a particular behaviour. TMS can be applied in normal subjects during the performance of a cognitive task and the resulting disruption of activity in the targeted brain region leads to an alteration in, or suspension of, behaviour consequent upon that brain activity. More recently, another brain stimulation technique has emerged that may also be able to contribute to the investigation of human cognition. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) applies a weak direct current to a targeted brain region, modulating cortical excitability and thereby altering the behavioural output. tDCS may be able to provide information that complements TMS and other investigative techniques by modulating behaviour in a way that depends on the role the brain region is carrying out in the task. This thesis describes a series of experiments in which TMS and tDCS were applied to two well-studied cognitive behaviours, working memory (WM) and mental rotation (MR). WM is the temporary retention of information that can be manipulated in order to guide behaviour. The most popular psychological model of WM proposes a multi-modal central executive (CE) that acts upon information stored in dedicated buffers (Baddeley, 1986). The dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) is a strong candidate as a key CE node (D'Esposito & Postle, 2000; Petrides, 2000b; Smith & Jonides, 1997; Stuss & Knight, 2002). MR is a visuo-cognitive process by which an image can be mentally modified into an orientation other than the one in which it is displayed (Corballis & McLaren, 1984). The area centred around the intraparietal sulcus is a brain key region for MR (Alivisatos & Petrides, 1996; Harris et al., 2000; Jordan et al., 2001). The work presented in this thesis examines the roles of the DLPFC and posterior parietal cortex (PPC) in WM and MR, respectively, and also highlights some of the methodological issues that are necessary to consider in order to produce reliable virtual lesions. The studies were carried out in young healthy volunteers, and were approved by the institutional ethics committee. In one study, repetitive TMS (rTMS) was shown to disrupt the manipulation of verbal information held in WM when administered over the right DLPFC, a result which supports a process-based segregation of the human prefrontal cortex for WM. Low- and high-frequency rTMS did not disrupt performance on another popular test of executive processing, n-back, a result which suggests that specific stimulation and task conditions must be met in order to produce virtual lesions, but also questions the critical importance of recruitment of the DLPFC for a running span task. rTMS applied to the right PPC replicated results from a previous TMS investigation, supporting the critical role this region in the rotation of images (Harris & Miniussi, 2003). When the left PPC was stimulated, impairment was produced only for the rotation of inverted stimuli. A role for the left PPC in the rotation of objects-as-a-whole is proposed based on these findings. The use of tDCS in the investigation of WM and MR is amongst the first to be described. Stimulation of the left DLPFC led to decreased performance accuracy on a verbal WM task in a polarity-specific manner. The pattern of results produced supports the role of the DLPFC as a node of a CE. tDCS over the left DLPFC did not modulate n-back task performance, a result which supports the TMS results that the involvement of the left DLPFC is not critical to the successful performance of the n-back task, although methodological issues remain of concern in relation to this conclusion. MR was not affected by tDCS applied to the right PPC and this result is most likely a direct demonstration of the importance of electrode montage. In conclusion, these studies show that rTMS and tDCS can be usefully applied to create virtual cortical lesions or modulate cortical excitability during the performance of cognitive tasks in humans, and can play an important role in investigating cognitive neuropsychological models. More widespread use of these techniques to complement lesion studies and functional neuroimaging is recommended.
Los estilos APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
9

Ebajemito, James K. "The modulatory effect of sleep on transcranial direct current stimulation-enhanced learning". Thesis, University of Surrey, 2018. http://epubs.surrey.ac.uk/845444/.

Texto completo
Resumen
Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) as a means for enhancing learning and memory has received a lot of attention in recent times. However, its applicability in a wider context has been limited due to lack of replicability across the literature. This may likely stem from inter-individual differences such as age, gender, nutrition, stress, brain morphology and sleep. Sleep in particular may be a source of inter-individual differences in tDCS-effect because of its link to brain plasticity mechanism such as long-term potentiation (LTP). The extent to which sleep may account for inter-individual differences in tDCS outcomes has not been assessed in the literature. Therefore, the central aim of this thesis is to investigate 1) the effect of sleep quality 2) circadian mis- /alignment 3) prior sleep compared to wake on tDCS-enhanced learning. Findings from this thesis suggests that sleep quality does not affect variability in tDCS-effect on cognitive performance, while circadian mis/-alignment and prior wakefulness before task may modulate tDCS-efficacy. In conclusion, data suggests that tDCS-effect is greater in a brain which is in a non-optimal state in terms of circadian misalignment and prolonged wake, and in this context, sleep may be responsible for variabilities in tDCS studies. These findings have implications for researchers and clinicians using tDCS. Further studies are required to fully characterise the findings from this thesis.
Los estilos APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
10

Impey, Danielle. "Assessment of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) on MMN-Indexed Auditory Sensory Processing". Thesis, Université d'Ottawa / University of Ottawa, 2016. http://hdl.handle.net/10393/35576.

Texto completo
Resumen
Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a non-invasive form of brain stimulation which uses a very weak constant current to temporarily excite or inhibit activity in the brain area of interest via electrodes placed on the scalp, depending on the polarity and strength of the current. Presently, tDCS is being used as a tool to investigate frontal cognition in healthy controls and to improve symptoms in neurological and psychiatric patients. Relatively little research has been conducted with respect to tDCS and the auditory cortex (AC). The primary aim of this thesis was to elucidate the effects of tDCS on auditory sensory discrimination, assessed with the mismatch negativity (MMN) event-related potential (ERP). In the first pilot study, healthy participants were assessed in a randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled design, in which participants received anodal tDCS over the primary AC (2 mA for 20 minutes) in one session and ‘sham’ stimulation (i.e. no stimulation) in the other. Pitch MMN was found to be enhanced after receiving anodal tDCS, with the effects being evidenced in individuals with relatively low (vs. high) baseline amplitudes. No significant effects were seen with sham stimulation. A second study examined the separate and interacting effects of anodal and cathodal tDCS on MMN measures. MMN was assessed pre- and post-tDCS (2 mA, 20 minutes) in 2 separate sessions, one involving sham stimulation, followed by anodal stimulation, and one involving cathodal stimulation, followed by anodal stimulation. Only anodal tDCS over the AC increased pitch MMN in baseline-stratified groups, and while cathodal tDCS decreased MMN, subsequent anodal stimulation did not significantly alter MMNs. As evidence has shown that tDCS lasting effects may be dependent on N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor activity, a pharmacological study investigated the use of dextromethorphan (DMO), an NMDA antagonist, to assess possible modulation of tDCS’ effects on both MMN and working memory (WM) performance. The study involved four test sessions that compared pre- and post-anodal tDCS over the AC and sham stimulation with both DMO (50 mL) and placebo administration. MMN amplitude increases were only seen with anodal tDCS with placebo administration, not with sham stimulation, nor with DMO administration. In the sham condition, DMO decreased MMN amplitudes. Anodal tDCS improved WM performance in the active drug condition. Findings from this study contribute to the understanding of underlying neurobiological mechanisms mediating tDCS-sensory and memory improvements. As cognitive impairment has been proposed to be the core feature of schizophrenia disorder (Sz) and MMN is a putative biomarker of Sz, a pilot study was conducted to assess the effects of pre- and post-tDCS on MMN measures in 12 Sz patients, as well as WM performance. Temporal, frontal and sham tDCS were applied in separate sessions. Results demonstrated a trend for pitch MMNs to increase with anodal temporal tDCS, which was significant in a subgroup of Sz individuals with auditory hallucinations, who had low MMNs at baseline. Anodal frontal tDCS significantly increased WM performance, which was found to positively correlate with MMN-tDCS effects. The findings contribute to our understanding of tDCS effects for MMN-indexed sensory discrimination and WM performance in healthy participants and individuals with Sz disorder and may have implications for treatment of sensory processing deficits in neuropsychiatric illness.
Los estilos APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.

Libros sobre el tema "Transcranial direct current stimulation"

1

Brunoni, André R., Michael A. Nitsche y Colleen K. Loo, eds. Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Neuropsychiatric Disorders. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-76136-3.

Texto completo
Los estilos APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
2

Brunoni, André, Michael Nitsche y Colleen Loo, eds. Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Neuropsychiatric Disorders. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33967-2.

Texto completo
Los estilos APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
3

Knotkova, Helena, Michael A. Nitsche, Marom Bikson y Adam J. Woods, eds. Practical Guide to Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95948-1.

Texto completo
Los estilos APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
4

International Symposium on Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (2nd 2003 Göttingen, Germany). Transcranial magnetic stimulation and transcranial direct current stimulation: Proceedings of the 2nd International Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) and Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) Symposium, Göttingen, Germany, 11-14 June 2003. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2003.

Buscar texto completo
Los estilos APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
5

Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation and Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation, Proceedings of the 2nd International Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) and Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) Symposium. Elsevier, 2003. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s1567-424x(09)x7005-4.

Texto completo
Los estilos APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
6

Nitsche, Michael A., Andrea Antal, David Liebetanz, Nicolas Lang, Frithjof Tergau y Walter Paulus. Neuroplasticity induced by transcranial direct current stimulation. Editado por Charles M. Epstein, Eric M. Wassermann y Ulf Ziemann. Oxford University Press, 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198568926.013.0017.

Texto completo
Resumen
This article explores the use of brain stimulation as a tool of neuroplasticity. Recent studies have shown that brain stimulation with weak direct currents is a technique used to generate prolonged modifications of cortical excitability and activity. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) generates modulations of excitability. The efficacy of electric brain stimulation is defined by the combination of strength of current, size of stimulated area, and stimulation duration. The two main fields of clinical application on tDCS are: the exploration of pathological alterations of neuroplasticity in neurological and psychiatric diseases, and the evaluation of a possible clinical benefit of tDCS in these diseases. Further studies are needed to explore this area if prolonged, repetitive, or stronger stimulation protocols, for which safety has to be assured, could evolve into clinically more relevant improvement. This article reinforces the fact that brain stimulation with weak direct currents could evolve as a promising tool in neuroplasticity research.
Los estilos APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
7

Knotkova, Helena, Michael A. Nitsche, Marom Bikson y Adam J. Woods. Practical Guide to Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation: Principles, Procedures and Applications. Springer, 2019.

Buscar texto completo
Los estilos APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
8

Rogers, Lionel. Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation: Emerging Uses, Safety and Neurobiological Effects. Nova Science Publishers, Incorporated, 2016.

Buscar texto completo
Los estilos APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
9

Nitsche, Michael A., André Brunoni y Colleen Loo. Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Neuropsychiatric Disorders: Clinical Principles and Management. Springer International Publishing AG, 2021.

Buscar texto completo
Los estilos APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
10

Brunoni, André, Michael Nitsche y Colleen Loo. Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Neuropsychiatric Disorders: Clinical Principles and Management. Springer, 2016.

Buscar texto completo
Los estilos APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.

Capítulos de libros sobre el tema "Transcranial direct current stimulation"

1

Ambrosini, Anna y Gianluca Coppola. "Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation". En Neuromodulation in Headache and Facial Pain Management, 111–18. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14121-9_8.

Texto completo
Los estilos APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
2

Loo, Colleen y Donel Martin. "Transcranial direct current stimulation". En Neuromodulation in Psychiatry, 227–43. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9781118801086.ch12.

Texto completo
Los estilos APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
3

Sellaro, Roberta, Michael A. Nitsche y Lorenza S. Colzato. "Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation". En Theory-Driven Approaches to Cognitive Enhancement, 99–112. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57505-6_8.

Texto completo
Los estilos APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
4

Khadka, Niranjan, Adam J. Woods y Marom Bikson. "Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Electrodes". En Practical Guide to Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation, 263–91. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95948-1_10.

Texto completo
Los estilos APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
5

Grossman, Pnina, Adam J. Woods, Helena Knotkova y Marom Bikson. "Safety of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation". En Practical Guide to Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation, 167–95. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95948-1_6.

Texto completo
Los estilos APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
6

Martinotti, Giovanni, Andrea Miuli, Mauro Pettorruso, Hamed Ekhtiari, Colleen A. Hanlon, Primavera A. Spagnolo y Massimo Di Giannantonio. "Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Addiction". En Non Invasive Brain Stimulation in Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences, 263–82. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-43356-7_19.

Texto completo
Los estilos APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
7

Fröhlich, Flavio, Sankaraleengam Alagapan, Michael R. Boyle, Franz Hamilton, Guoshi Li, Caroline Lustenberger y Stephen L. Schmidt. "Target Engagement with Transcranial Current Stimulation". En Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Neuropsychiatric Disorders, 197–222. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33967-2_11.

Texto completo
Los estilos APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
8

Fröhlich, Flavio, Rachel Force, Wei Angel Huang, Caroline Lustenberger, Trevor McPherson, Justin Riddle y Christopher Walker. "Target Engagement with Transcranial Current Stimulation". En Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Neuropsychiatric Disorders, 211–42. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-76136-3_11.

Texto completo
Los estilos APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
9

Paulus, Walter y Alberto Priori. "Current Methods and Approaches of Noninvasive Direct Current–Based Neuromodulation Techniques". En Practical Guide to Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation, 115–31. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95948-1_4.

Texto completo
Los estilos APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
10

Woods, Adam J., Daria Antonenko, Agnes Flöel, Benjamin M. Hampstead, David Clark y Helena Knotkova. "Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Aging Research". En Practical Guide to Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation, 569–95. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95948-1_19.

Texto completo
Los estilos APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.

Actas de conferencias sobre el tema "Transcranial direct current stimulation"

1

Rodríguez-Ugarte, Marisol, Nadia Sciacca y José M. Azorín. "Transcranial direct current stimulatio (tDCS) and transcranial current alterning stimulation (tACS) review". En Actas de las XXXVII Jornadas de Automática 7, 8 y 9 de septiembre de 2016, Madrid. Universidade da Coruña, Servizo de Publicacións, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.17979/spudc.9788497498081.0137.

Texto completo
Resumen
This literature review is aimed to explore the main technical characteristics of both transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and transcranial alternate current stimulation (tACS) using the latest research on both healthy and impaired subjects. These techniques have no official standards developed yet. Our intent is to underline the main properties and problems linked with the application of those techniques which show diverse, and sometimes even opposite, results depending mainly on electrode positioning and underlying brain activity.
Los estilos APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
2

Peterchev, A. V., S. C. Dhamne, R. Kothare y A. Rotenberg. "Transcranial magnetic stimulation induces current pulses in transcranial direct current stimulation electrodes". En 2012 34th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC). IEEE, 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/embc.2012.6346055.

Texto completo
Los estilos APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
3

Wan, Bo, Chi Vi, Sriram Subramanian y Diego Martinez Plasencia. "Enhancing Interactivity with Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation". En IUI'16: 21st International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces. New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2876456.2879482.

Texto completo
Los estilos APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
4

Cancelli, A., C. Cottone, M. Parazzini, S. Fiocchi, D. Truong, M. Bikson y F. Tecchio. "Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation: Personalizing the neuromodulation". En 2015 37th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC). IEEE, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/embc.2015.7318343.

Texto completo
Los estilos APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
5

Sun, Minghui, Hui yan Li y Dong Guo. "An adaptive transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS)". En 2019 6th International Conference on Systems and Informatics (ICSAI). IEEE, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/icsai48974.2019.9010131.

Texto completo
Los estilos APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
6

Calderón, María Antonia Fuentes, Laura Olmedo Jiménez y María José Sanchez Ledesma. "Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation versus Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation as neuromodulatory techniques in stroke rehabilitation". En TEEM'18: Sixth International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality. New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3284179.3284251.

Texto completo
Los estilos APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
7

Parazzini, M., E. Rossi, R. Ferrucci, S. Fiocchi, I. Liorni, A. Priori y P. Ravazzani. "Computational model of cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation". En 2013 35th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC). IEEE, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/embc.2013.6609481.

Texto completo
Los estilos APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
8

Caytak, H. B., I. Batkin, A. Mekonnen, D. Shapiro, S. Hassoun, G. Li, H. R. Dajani y M. Bolic. "Superabsorbent polymer electrode for transcranial direct current stimulation". En 2013 IEEE International Symposium on Medical Measurements and Applications (MeMeA). IEEE, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/memea.2013.6549760.

Texto completo
Los estilos APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
9

Carneiro, Julia Alves, Carolina Torres Ribeiro, Paolo Gripp Carreño y Jean Marcos de Souza. "Transcranial direct current stimulation for greater trochanteric pain syndrome". En XXXIX Congresso Brasileiro de Reumatologia. Sociedade Brasileiro de Reumatologia, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.47660/cbr.2022.1890.

Texto completo
Los estilos APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
10

Cassidy, Ben, Victor Solo y Caroline Rae. "Direct mapping of T2* signal changes induced by Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation". En 2013 IEEE 10th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI 2013). IEEE, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/isbi.2013.6556664.

Texto completo
Los estilos APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.

Informes sobre el tema "Transcranial direct current stimulation"

1

Rotenberg, Alexander. Prevention of Post-Traumatic Epilepsy by Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation. Fort Belvoir, VA: Defense Technical Information Center, septiembre de 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.21236/ada614101.

Texto completo
Los estilos APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
2

Matzen, Laura E. y Michael Christopher Stefan Trumbo. Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) on Human Memory. Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI), octubre de 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.2172/1160298.

Texto completo
Los estilos APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
3

Nelson, Justin, R. A. McKinley, Lindsey K. McIntire y Chuck D. Goodyear. Augmenting Visual Search Performance with Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS). Fort Belvoir, VA: Defense Technical Information Center, marzo de 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.21236/ada623248.

Texto completo
Los estilos APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
4

Nunes, Isadora, Katia Sá, Mônica Rios, Yossi Zana y Abrahão Baptista. Non-invasive Brain Stimulation in the Management of COVID-19: Protocol for a Systematic Review. INPLASY - International Platform of Registered Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Protocols, diciembre de 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.37766/inplasy2022.12.0033.

Texto completo
Resumen
Review question / Objective: What is the efficacy or effectiveness of NIBS techniques, specifically repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS), transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS), percutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (paVNS), and neck vagus nerve stimulation (nVNS), in the control of outcomes associated with COVID-19 in the acute or post-COVID persistent syndrome? Eligibility criteria: Included clinical studies assessed participants with acute or persistent post-COVID-19 syndrome submitted to NIBS interventions, namely transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS), transcranial random noise stimulation (tRNS), transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), theta burst (cTBS or iTBS). Studies that used peripheral and spinal cord stimulation techniques were also included. Those included vagus nerve stimulation (VNS), such as transcutaneous auricular (taVNS), percutaneous auricular (paVNS), transcranial random noise stimulation (tRNS) trans-spinal direct current stimulation (tsDCS) and other peripheral electrical stimulation (PES) techniques. Scientific communication, protocol studies, reviews and non-English papers were excluded.
Los estilos APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
5

Wu, Ming-Kung y Ping-Tao Tseng. The efficacy of transcranial direct current stimulation in enhancing surgical skill acquisition. INPLASY - International Platform of Registered Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Protocols, abril de 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.37766/inplasy2021.4.0099.

Texto completo
Los estilos APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
6

Wagner, Jessica A. Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Expression of Immediate Early Genes (IEG's). Fort Belvoir, VA: Defense Technical Information Center, diciembre de 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.21236/ada627540.

Texto completo
Los estilos APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
7

du, jinchao, chengdong zhang, junfang lei, meiyi luo y jiqin tang. Network Meta-analysis of the effects of different stimulation methods of transcranial direct current stimulation on dysphagia after stroke. INPLASY - International Platform of Registered Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Protocols, agosto de 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.37766/inplasy2022.8.0105.

Texto completo
Los estilos APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
8

Tedla, Jaya Shanker, Devika Sangadala, Ravi Shankar Reddy, Kumar Gular y Venkata Nagaraj Kakaraparthi. Effect of High-Definition Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (HDtDCS) on higher mental functions: A systematic review. INPLASY - International Platform of Registered Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Protocols, febrero de 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.37766/inplasy2021.2.0049.

Texto completo
Los estilos APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
9

Huang, Jiapeng, Kehong Zhao, Ziqi Zhao y Yun Qu. Neuroprotection by Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Rodent Models of Focal Ischemic Stroke: A Meta-analysis. INPLASY - International Platform of Registered Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Protocols, mayo de 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.37766/inplasy2021.5.0080.

Texto completo
Los estilos APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
10

Wang, Haonan. Effectiveness of transcranial direct current stimulation in the modulation of central neuropathic pain: a systematic review. INPLASY - International Platform of Registered Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Protocols, septiembre de 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.37766/inplasy2021.9.0075.

Texto completo
Los estilos APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
Ofrecemos descuentos en todos los planes premium para autores cuyas obras están incluidas en selecciones literarias temáticas. ¡Contáctenos para obtener un código promocional único!

Pasar a la bibliografía