Literatura académica sobre el tema "Stratégie de dissuasion"
Crea una cita precisa en los estilos APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard y otros
Consulte las listas temáticas de artículos, libros, tesis, actas de conferencias y otras fuentes académicas sobre el tema "Stratégie de dissuasion".
Junto a cada fuente en la lista de referencias hay un botón "Agregar a la bibliografía". Pulsa este botón, y generaremos automáticamente la referencia bibliográfica para la obra elegida en el estilo de cita que necesites: APA, MLA, Harvard, Vancouver, Chicago, etc.
También puede descargar el texto completo de la publicación académica en formato pdf y leer en línea su resumen siempre que esté disponible en los metadatos.
Artículos de revistas sobre el tema "Stratégie de dissuasion"
Macron, Emmanuel. "Stratégie de défense et de dissuasion". Revue Défense Nationale N° 829, n.º 4 (1 de abril de 2020): 5–22. http://dx.doi.org/10.3917/rdna.829.0005.
Texto completoBaulon, Jean-Philippe. "Surprise et stratégie nucléaire : aux sources de la dissuasion". Stratégique N° 106, n.º 2 (2014): 73. http://dx.doi.org/10.3917/strat.106.0073.
Texto completoMawoune, Warayanssa. "La peur comme stratégie dissuasive et d’éducation sentimentale dans les contes pour jeunes filles au Nord-Cameroun". Ondina - Ondine, n.º 5 (12 de enero de 2021): 41–57. http://dx.doi.org/10.26754/ojs_ondina/ond.202053867.
Texto completoSteininger, Philippe. "Pertinence de la composante aéroportée dans la stratégie de dissuasion nucléaire". Revue Défense Nationale N° 782, n.º 7 (1 de julio de 2015): 42–46. http://dx.doi.org/10.3917/rdna.782.0042.
Texto completoKAPENGA, Jean Pierre KABEMBA. "Le droit pénal et la covid-19 en République Démocratique du Congo." KAS African Law Study Library - Librairie Africaine d’Etudes Juridiques 8, n.º 1 (2021): 119–34. http://dx.doi.org/10.5771/2363-6262-2021-1-119.
Texto completoGéré, François. "Faute de frappe ou l’érosion de la stratégie française de dissuasion nucléaire". Revue Défense Nationale N° 782, n.º 7 (1 de julio de 2015): 176–85. http://dx.doi.org/10.3917/rdna.782.0176.
Texto completoBrun, Jean-François. "Un aspect de la stratégie nucléaire française : le réseau interarmées d’alerte". Revue Historique des Armées 262, n.º 1 (1 de enero de 2011): 68–89. http://dx.doi.org/10.3917/rha.262.0068.
Texto completoBaconnet, Alexis. "Au-delà de la défense contre les missiles : une stratégie américaine anti-dissuasion". Revue Défense Nationale N° 782, n.º 7 (1 de julio de 2015): 84–89. http://dx.doi.org/10.3917/rdna.782.0084.
Texto completoDanièle, Dray-Zéraffa. "Joxe Alain, Le cycle de la dissuasion (1945-1990). Essai de stratégie critique". Vingtième Siècle. Revue d'histoire 29, n.º 1 (1 de enero de 1991): 118–19. http://dx.doi.org/10.3917/ving.p1991.29n1.0118.
Texto completoHenrotin, Joseph. "Temps de crise pour la dissuasion ? La question nucléaire nord-coréenne à l’aune de la stratégie nucléaire". Monde chinois 53, n.º 1 (2018): 32. http://dx.doi.org/10.3917/mochi.053.0032.
Texto completoTesis sobre el tema "Stratégie de dissuasion"
Jumel, Philippe. "La conduite de la dissuasion". Paris, Institut d'études politiques, 1988. http://www.theses.fr/1988IEPP0011.
Texto completoTertrais, Bruno. "La stratégie nucléaire de l'OTAN : dissuasion élargie et rôle des armes nucléaires américaines en Europe, 1949-1992". Paris, Institut d'études politiques, 1994. http://www.theses.fr/1994IEPP0037.
Texto completoThis study offers a comprehensive perspective on the operational aspects of NATO's nuclear strategy, through an analysis of the role of us nuclear weapons in Europe from 1949 to 1992. Preliminary questions concern : the way NATO's strategy has been constructed ; the nature of this strategy ; and the structure of its historical evolution. Part I, "looking for a common doctrine : the dilemmas of extended deterrence", describes the emergence of the concept of tactical use of nuclear weapons, and the difficulties encountered in the alliance to implement a strategy based on a massive recourse to nuclear weapons. Part II, "a solution to the dilemmas ? Flexible response as a modus operandi for extended deterrence" analyses the compromises on which flexible response is based, the way this strategy has been implemented, and the subsequent modifications in NATO's nuclear posture. Part III, "challenge to extended deterrence : NATO's nuclear strategy and the end of the cold war", analyses the consequences of the political upheavals in Europe for NATO's nuclear strategy, and questions the validity of this strategy. In conclusion, the author suggests, in particular, that political will has played a key role in ensuring that NATO's nuclear strategy develops in a coherent fashion. A critical analysis of NATO's nuclear strategy is also included
Courmont, Barthélémy. "L'utilisation de la bombe atomique à Hiroshima : éléments de décision et alternatives". Paris 7, 2005. http://www.theses.fr/2005PA070005.
Texto completoSixty years after the first use of the atomic bomb, the reference of Hiroshima remains a symbol of the destruction of life, and the science to serve human barbarian purpose. The paradox of the Japanese city is that it both represents the end of an era and the beginning of another one. Some celebrate Hiroshima as the event that ended the most terrible war in human history. Others consider that the power of the new weapon will lead -the humanity to its own destruction. The bomb used on August 6, 1945, known as “Little Boy”, is then both considered as a peace weapon and the most powerful and efficient killing tool ever produced. This PhD thesis analyses the different elements that justified the use of the supreme weapon, the proposed alternatives, and the geopolitical context in which this foreign policy and, to some extent domestic politics, choice was made. The debates that took place before the use, the diplomatic manoeuvres from both Tokyo and Moscow are developed here, as well as the reasons that justified the choice of the atomic bomb among the different proposals, and the consequences for world history. One of the objectives is to determine whether this weapon, which was useless in ending the war against Japan, could not having been used by the US
Lee, Sung-Man. "La sécurité de la Corée du Sud : la menace et les moyens d'une petite puissance". Paris 1, 1996. http://www.theses.fr/1996PA010257.
Texto completoIn the competitive international society which favors the powerful, what is the strategy of security to defend the vital interests of south korea, a country which does not belong to the group of the powerful, and which has not kept its independence to build its own strategy and to develop it ? In a peninsular country like south korea, surrounded by powerful neighbors, the security of the state through diplomatic efforts is very important. The strengthening of the capacity of protection as a unique means is not sufficient for its national defense. Nevertheless, the national security strategy poses on the whole, the question of the independent defense, because the last objective of the policy of security is tantamount to assume the independent security. We have therefore proposed a korean model of military strategy, "the strategy of survival of the koran people" which means the actively defensive strategy centered on diplomacy. This strategy is presented following three steps : the strategy of dissuasion, the strategy of defense and the strategy of survival. Our study seeks, by analyzing korea's security situation, to expose the particularity of this situation. And it aims, by clarifying and recomposing the known strategy theories, to establish a strategy for the survival of south korea and the reunified peninsula, a strategy appropriated to korean particular circumstances
Grémare, Benoit. "L’arme nucléaire française : aspects de droit public". Thesis, Université de Lorraine, 2020. https://docnum.univ-lorraine.fr/ulprive/DDOC_T_2020_0193_GREMARE.pdf.
Texto completoIn France, nuclear weapons remain an essential strategic stake for the power of the State and the prerogative of its sovereignty through the credibility of its discourse of deterrence. While in international law, its statute and its normativity generate disputes relating to its legality of use and its legitimacy of existence, the French nuclear weapon embodies the life insurance of the Nation in the event of a serious crisis. Responding to the needs of a new era, it partly determines the state apparatus, adapts to societal and international developments. As such, the Constitution being a prescriptive set of norms which govern the institutions, attribute competences, fix the procedures, it also proceeds by affirmation on the nature of the regime, leading to publicly consecrate this consensus on nuclear weapons. But although subject to customary consensus, the French nuclear weapon is limited to a material means serving the Constitutional issue of National Independence, the effectiveness of which remains limited. Going beyond this limit requires systemizing the French nuclear weapon by taking up its original concept of "strike force" which, instituted at the time on a Constitutional basis through military program laws, takes over from this sovereign mission essential to sovereignty which corresponds to ensuring the defense of the Nation, preserving its independence and ensuring its institutions. Nuclear law is positive and to imagine a strike force empowered by the Constitution to defend vital interests as a palliative for general mobilization is to describe a state of affairs expressed in the form of imperative to remain binding. The inclusion of the concept of strike force in the Constitution would make it possible, in addition to securing the nuclear deterrence strategy beyond political contingencies, to confirm its normative dimension and its Constitutional essence. Unheard of in the legal history of concepts, this anticipation by the legislator would provide sustainability regardless of technological developments and would lead to an adaptation of the French nuclear doctrine, the sovereign requiring a strike force capable of preserving its constituents and their vital national interests, while by integrating the European dimension. Insert the strike force in the Constitution would allow nuclear weapons to be consecrated as one of the sovereign means serving the Constitutional objective of National Independence
Vaicbourdt, Nicolas. "John Foster Dulles à l'heure de la première détente : 1953-1959 : entre leadership et unilatérisme : les Etats-Unis et la guerre froide". Paris 1, 2004. http://www.theses.fr/2004PA010688.
Texto completoChen, Shihmin. "Analyse et comparaison des stratégies nucléaires des puissances nucléaires moyennes : France, Royaume-Uni et Chine". Paris 1, 2000. http://www.theses.fr/2000PA010289.
Texto completoPélopidas, Benoît. "La séduction de l’impossible : étude sur le renoncement à l’arme nucléaire et l’autorité politique des experts". Paris, Institut d'études politiques, 2010. http://www.theses.fr/2010IEPP0037.
Texto completoMost "proliferation experts" consider the scenario in which a nuclear-weapon-state gives up his nuclear arsenal as highly improbable or impossible. Academics as well as government experts seem to share this view. They already did when South Africa, Ukraine, Belarus and Kazakhstan did give up their arsenals. This dissertation therefore explores the two sides of the "seduction of the impossible". One leads experts to think about nuclear history within the framework of a "proliferation paradigm" we shall describe; the other leads policymakers to actually do what is considered as impossible, in other words, giving up nuclear arsenals or ambitions. For this discourse of impossibility to be valid, two conditions should be met. First, this impossibility should be identified in the past thanks to a series of necessary conditions that reduces its probability. Second, the future should be known to resemble the past. This dissertation tests these two assumptions with structured and focus comparisons of historical cases and investigates the consequences of the "proliferation paradigm" in terms of political authority of experts. It tests a series of supposedly necessary conditions for renunciation to occur and assesses whether these conditions could be sufficient. If so, under the assumption that the future will resemble the past, experts could dictate a unidimensional renunciation policy on the sole basis of their knowledge
Garcin, Thierry. "La France nucléaire dans le troisième cercle". Paris 1, 1991. http://www.theses.fr/1991PA010277.
Texto completoAutonomous nuclear power with a coherent and complete deterrent force, france has promoted a foreign policy whose aspiration is mundial. Present, influent, even acting during crisis or conflicts, france has often utilized its nuclear status in order to reinforce its international rank. Strategically, its particular action is determined by three symbolical circles : national territory, europe ans its approaches, and the rest of the world (general lucien poirier). Consequently, what is the influence of the est-west relations on its foreign policy ? How can france defend international law, its allies and its interests abroad, with which maritime priorities ? What are and what will be constraints and limits of military interventions, given the new political landscape in the est and in the south, given the new role of nuclear deterrence in international affairs ? In conclusion, the theory of the "three circles" must be replaced by the theory of "two circles" : national territory, and the rest of the world. That will demand a new structure of defense and a reorientation of French foreign policy
Mayaleh-Mayard, Juliette. "Le programme nucléaire iranien : Les implications pour les pays arabes". Paris 2, 2010. http://www.theses.fr/2010PA020039.
Texto completoLibros sobre el tema "Stratégie de dissuasion"
Le cycle de la dissuasion, 1945-1990: Essai de stratégie critique. Paris: La Découverte, 1990.
Buscar texto completoG, Manwaring Max, ed. Deterrence in the 21st century. London: Frank Cass, 2001.
Buscar texto completoYost, David S. La France et la sécurité européenne. Paris: Presses universitaires de France, 1985.
Buscar texto completo1940-, Hardin Russell, ed. Nuclear deterrence: Ethics and strategy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1985.
Buscar texto completoB, Byers R., York University (Toronto, Ont.). Research Programme in Strategic Studies. y Conference on "Deterrence in the 1980s" (1984 : York University), eds. Deterrence in the 1980s: Crisis and dilemma. London: Croom Helm, 1985.
Buscar texto completo1944-, Stern Paul C., National Research Council (U.S.). Committee on Contributions of Behavioral and Social Science to the Prevention of Nuclear War. y National Research Council (U.S.). Commission on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education., eds. Perspectives on deterrence. New York: Oxford University Press, 1989.
Buscar texto completoIan, Kenyon y Simpson John 1943-, eds. Deterrence and the new global security environment. London: Frank Cass Pub., 2003.
Buscar texto completoV, Paul T., Harknett Richard J. 1963- y Wirtz James J. 1958-, eds. The absolute weapon revisited: Nuclear arms and the emerging international order. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1998.
Buscar texto completoProblèmes stratégiques contemporains. Paris: Hachette, 1992.
Buscar texto completoDeterrence by diplomacy. Princeton, N.J: Princeton University Press, 2005.
Buscar texto completoCapítulos de libros sobre el tema "Stratégie de dissuasion"
Henrotin, Joseph. "La dissuasion". En Guerre et stratégie, 425–40. Presses Universitaires de France, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.3917/puf.henro.2015.01.0425.
Texto completoCrosston, Matthew. "La dissuasion en amont: une stratégie efficace contre l’extrémisme violent". En Le nouvel âge des extrêmes ?, 363–80. Les Presses de l’Université de Montréal, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/9782760642126-020.
Texto completoRoche, Nicolas. "Les questions morales et philosophiques soulevées par la stratégie de dissuasion nucléaire". En L'action extérieure de la France, 495–528. Presses Universitaires de France, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.3917/puf.souto.2020.01.0495.
Texto completoTertrais, Bruno. "États-Unis : une nouvelle conception de la dissuasion ?" En Annuaire stratégique et militaire, 17–29. Odile Jacob, 2002. http://dx.doi.org/10.3917/oj.fonda.2002.01.0017.
Texto completoTertrais, Bruno. "Dissuasion nucléaire : enjeux et défis pour 2007-2012". En Annuaire stratégique et militaire 2006-2007, 49–62. Odile Jacob, 2007. http://dx.doi.org/10.3917/oj.fonda.2007.01.0049.
Texto completoHeisbourg, François. "La dissuasion nucléaire a-t-elle préservé la paix ?" En Annuaire stratégique et militaire 2005, 15–34. Odile Jacob, 2005. http://dx.doi.org/10.3917/oj.fprs.2005.01.0015.
Texto completo