Literatura académica sobre el tema "Solomon' Palace"

Crea una cita precisa en los estilos APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard y otros

Elija tipo de fuente:

Consulte las listas temáticas de artículos, libros, tesis, actas de conferencias y otras fuentes académicas sobre el tema "Solomon' Palace".

Junto a cada fuente en la lista de referencias hay un botón "Agregar a la bibliografía". Pulsa este botón, y generaremos automáticamente la referencia bibliográfica para la obra elegida en el estilo de cita que necesites: APA, MLA, Harvard, Vancouver, Chicago, etc.

También puede descargar el texto completo de la publicación académica en formato pdf y leer en línea su resumen siempre que esté disponible en los metadatos.

Artículos de revistas sobre el tema "Solomon' Palace"

1

Willis, Joyce. "Conversation in the Succession Narrative of Solomon". Vetus Testamentum 61, n.º 1 (2011): 133–47. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/156853311x551466.

Texto completo
Resumen
AbstractReading 1 Kings 1-2, the account of the succession of Solomon, one is left with a strange impression. On the one hand, in its current telling and context it clearly seeks to offer a favourable account of the process. On the other hand, one just has to scratch the surface of this story to see an underlying and less favourable account. The paper notes the importance role that private conversations play in the story to argue that an earlier telling of the story was largely fabricated by a party opposed to the Davidic monarchy and Solomon in particular. According to this telling, a cloud stood over Solomon’s legitimacy; David was hoodwinked by Nathan and Bathsheba into believing that he had made an earlier promise that Solomon would succeed; Solomon came to the throne by means of a palace coup; Abishag was not David’s concubine and Adonijah’s request for her was quite innocent; however, his approach and private conversation with Bathsheba was manipulated by Solomon and his supporters to remove significant personal opponents.
Los estilos APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
2

Gur, Zeev. "The Bathsheba Affair as a Royal Apology of King Solomon". Journal of Ancient Judaism 10, n.º 3 (19 de mayo de 2019): 288–353. http://dx.doi.org/10.30965/21967954-01003003.

Texto completo
Resumen
Analysis of the story of David and Bathsheba in 2 Samuel 11:1–12:25 reveals that it possesses several layers. The report of the second Ammonite War, which represents the initial content of 2 Samuel 11:1–12:31 and serves as the basis of the original Bathsheba Affair story, glorified David as a great warrior and gracious king, who married the widow of his fallen-in-action officer, Uriah the Hittite, and adopted Uriah’s newborn son, Solomon. The later Bathsheba Affair story, written by a pro-Solomonic author during Solomon’s reign, introduced the arbitrary taking of Bathsheba, Uriah the Hittite’s wife, by David before her husband met a natural warrior’s death. According to this version, Bathsheba remained with David in his palace and conceived there. The story demonstrates that Solomon, Bathsheba’s firstborn child, was not Uriah’s son but rather, by claiming direct royal lineage to King David, was David’s legitimate successor to the Throne of Israel. The next three revisions of the story 1) introduced Nathan the Prophet’s accusations against David, presumed to have been written between the late ninth and late eighth centuries B.C.E. by a prophetic author; 2) replaced Solomon with a fictitious firstborn child, written by a Deuteronomistic writer in the exilic period; and 3) introduced David’s second transgression – the murder of Uriah – written by an anti-Davidic author in the post-exilic period.
Los estilos APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
3

GELİR ÇELEBİ, Azize. "JERUSALEM CITY IN THE PERIOD OF KING HEROD". SOCIAL SCIENCE DEVELOPMENT JOURNAL 8, n.º 38 (15 de julio de 2023): 135–45. http://dx.doi.org/10.31567/ssd.948.

Texto completo
Resumen
Jerusalem has hosted many civilizations throughout its long history. Among these civilizations, Rome is one of the longest-lasting with 700 years. During the period when Jerusalem was ruled as a kingdom dependent on Rome, King Herod came to the fore with his devotion to Rome and the works he dedicated to his kingdom. King Herod was not just a manager/manager, but an engineer, city planner and entrepreneur. Knowing well the meaning it has for Jerusalem and the Jews, King Herod first built the larger and more magnificent Second Temple in Jerusalem, instead of the Temple built by King Solomon. In this way, Herod, who aimed to make the Jews happy and to get the support of his Jewish subjects, turned Jerusalem into a pilgrimage center. Herod, who had the Antonia Castle built in order to ensure the safety of the Holy Temple, had this castle built to have the characteristics of a palace. King Herod, who had his own palace built in the west of the city, displayed his fondness for luxury and splendor in this palace, as in all the palaces he had built. Adding entertainment structures such as the theater and hippodrome to the social life, Herod also showed his loyalty to Rome in the city he transformed into a Roman colony. King Herod's reign was a time of high economic prosperity for Jerusalem and its Jewish people. In addition, King Herod gained the title of "Great" with every building and project he signed and managed to write his name in history as Herod the Great.
Los estilos APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
4

Garfinkel, Yosef y Madeleine Mumcuoglu. "The Temple of Solomon in Iron Age Context". Religions 10, n.º 3 (15 de marzo de 2019): 198. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/rel10030198.

Texto completo
Resumen
1 Kings preserves a long and detailed description of the construction of a temple and palace in Jerusalem by King Solomon in the 10th century BCE. Previous generations of scholars accepted this description as an authentic account. Accordingly, much literature on this text and the relevant archeological discoveries has accumulated. Since the 1980s, skeptical approaches to the early part of the Kingdom of Judah, the biblical text, and the archaeological record have been expressed. Some scholars doubt whether any temple at all was constructed in Jerusalem in the 10th century BCE. In the last few years, the picture has been changed by new discoveries from two Judean sites: a building model of the early 10th century BCE from Khirbet Qeiyafa and an actual temple building of the 9th century BCE from Motza. In this article, we present the history of research, some aspects of the biblical text and the contribution of the new discoveries. These enable us to place in context both the biblical text and the building it describes.
Los estilos APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
5

Shafir, Nir. "Nābulusī Explores the Ruins of Baalbek: Antiquarianism in the Ottoman Empire during the Seventeenth Century". Renaissance Quarterly 75, n.º 1 (2022): 136–84. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/rqx.2021.332.

Texto completo
Resumen
Although it is generally thought that Muslims paid little attention to pre-Islamic antiquity, the Damascene scholar ʿAbd al-Ghanī al-Nābulusī visited and described the Roman ruins of Baalbek twice, in 1689 and 1700. He interpreted the site, however, not as a temple but as a palace built by jinns for Solomon. Nābulusī was very likely aware of the site's Roman past but purposefully played with its historicity to highlight Syria's innate sanctity. His interpretation of Baalbek reveals an antiquarian project in the Ottoman Empire that was constructed along variant but parallel lines to the better known one in Renaissance Europe.
Los estilos APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
6

Konarski, Marcin. "Przewrót polityczny jako forma sukcesji władzy królewskiej w monarchii zjednoczonej Izraela. Od Saula do Salomona". Studia Iuridica Lublinensia 27, n.º 4 (15 de junio de 2019): 51. http://dx.doi.org/10.17951/sil.2018.27.4.51-70.

Texto completo
Resumen
<p>The aim of this article is to analyse the issues related to a political upheaval as a form of the succession of royal power in the monarchy of united Israel in the period that started during the reign of the first king of the Hebrews – Saul – till the last years David spent on the throne. During the period analysed in this article, there were several unsuccessful attempts to seize power through a political coup. Due to the fact that the inheritance based on the principle of primogeniture was never unambiguously introduced in the Kingdom of Israel, the most serious upheaval, described as a palace revolution, took place at the end of King David’s life. As a result, the younger son of David – Solomon – ascended to Israel’s throne, despite the fact that there were no legitimate grounds for him to take power.</p>
Los estilos APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
7

Taylor, Brian. "Alexander’s Apostasy: First Steps to Jerusalem". Studies in Church History 29 (1992): 363–71. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0424208400011396.

Texto completo
Resumen
The synagogue in Bevis Marks in the city of London, 1700-1, is the oldest in this country. The second is in Plymouth, in Catherine Street. It was built in 1762, and is the oldest Ashkenazi synagogue in the English-speaking world. It is noteworthy for its original furnishings, which are mainly austere—the deal benches, and plain turned balusters for the enclosures, with the eight brass candle-sticks, now electrified, round the bimah. The exception is the ornately carved wooden ark, towering almost to the ceiling, with large urns on the entablature, which is supported by Corinthian columns. It is mortifying to the Hebrew congregation that its existence is mostly known not for its historic and architectural importance, but in connection with the defection of one of its ministers, Michael Solomon Alexander, in 1825. A little more than sixteen years later, Alexander was consecrated for the newly constituted Jerusalem bishopric, on 7 December 1841, in Lambeth Palace Chapel. Archbishop Howley was joined in the laying on of hands by Blomfield of London, Murray of Rochester, and Selwyn of New Zealand, who had been consecrated in the same chapel three weeks before.
Los estilos APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
8

Ryabokin, Alina. "THE ESTABLISHMENT OF THE PROFESSIONAL CHRISTIAN MUSIC IN THE EARLY MEDIEVAL TIME". EUREKA: Social and Humanities 3 (31 de mayo de 2020): 36–40. http://dx.doi.org/10.21303/2504-5571.2020.001319.

Texto completo
Resumen
The article deals with the formation of sacred music by Christians in the early Middle Ages. Basing on the historical sources and scientific literature, the authors show a connection between the musical traditions of Rome, the Western Goths of Spain and the empire of Charlemagne. The teaching of professional church singers, the birth of Mass, the complexity of the musical pattern of Christian singing, the educational ideas of Isidore of Seville and Alcuin of York, the metriz school timely opened by Christian mentors – all of it contributed to the formation of the early medieval educational process. Alcuin is the author of many (about 380) Latin instructive, panegyric, hagiographic, and liturgical poems (among the most famous are The Cuckoo (lat. De cuculo) and The Primate and Saints of the York Church (lat. De pontificibus et sanctis Ecclesiae Eboracensis )). Alcuin also wrote puzzles in poetry and prose. Alkuin conducted the extensive correspondence (with Charles the Great, Anguilbert, Pope Leo III and many others, a total of 232 letters to various people); Alcuin's letters are an important source on the history of the Carolingian society. At the Palace Academy, Alquin taught trivium and quadrivia elements; in his work On True Philosophy, he restored the scheme of the seven liberal arts, following Kassiodor’s parallel between the seven arts and the seven pillars of the temple of Wisdom of Solomon. He compiled textbooks on various subjects (some in a dialogical form). The Art of Grammar (lat. Ars grammatica) and the Slovene of the Most Noble Young Man Pipin with Albin Scholastic (Lat. Disputatio regalis et nobilissimi juvenis Pippini cum Albino scholastico) became very famous. Alcuin’s textbooks on dialectics, dogmatics, rhetoric, and liturgy are also known.
Los estilos APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
9

MINOV, Sergey. "The Story of Solomon's Palace at Heliopolis". Le Muséon 123, n.º 1 (30 de junio de 2010): 61–89. http://dx.doi.org/10.2143/mus.123.1.2052766.

Texto completo
Los estilos APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
10

Углева, Н. В. "The Experience of Attribution of the Throne Chair of Tsar Alexei Mikhailovich Romanov and the Ivory Throne in the 19th–21st Centuries". Nasledie Vekov, n.º 2(30) (30 de junio de 2022): 80–92. http://dx.doi.org/10.36343/sb.2022.30.2.006.

Texto completo
Resumen
В статье уточняется атрибуция двух тронных кресел («алмазного трона» и «костяного трона») из собрания Оружейной палаты, датировка и происхождение которых до настоящего времени не были точно установлены. Материалами послужили сами изучаемые предметы мебели, архивные источники, опубликованная документация дворцовых приказов и Архива Оружейной Палаты, коронационные альбомы, а также результаты предшествовавших исследований. Выявлены обстоятельства появления «алмазного трона» в кремлевской сокровищнице, сделан вывод о датировке его создания XV–XVI вв. и первоначальном изготовлении работавшими в Иране европейскими мастерами. Появление «костяного трона» датируется периодом не ранее 1621 г. На основе источников первой половины XVII в. описывается подобный объект – «большой костяной стул», предполагается, что два данных предмета фактически являются одним и тем же артефактом, восходящим к XIV в. и за время своего бытования пережившим множественные реконструкции и изменения. The study aims to clarify the attribution of two throne chairs (“diamond throne” and “ivory throne”), which are part of the collection of the Kremlin Armoury, since their dating and origin are still objects of scientific discussion. The materials used were the furniture items themselves, documents from the Russian State Archive of Ancient Acts, published documents of palace orders and the Armoury Archive, coronation albums, as well as the results of previous historical, art history and museological studies conducted by various scientists during almost two hundred years. The author for the first time considers the studied artifacts as objects of furniture art, using the method of stylistic analysis, the comparative method, research methods used in source studies and specialized auxiliary scientific disciplines, as well as methods and techniques for establishing the text. The author substantiates the dating of the appearance of Alexei Mikhailovich’s throne chair in the Kremlin Treasury, reveals the name of the person who ordered the throne and the role of persons involved in donating the throne chair. The author analyzes references to the chair in the coronation albums and in later studies containing the image of the subject. The exhibit is considered from the point of view of the development of furniture art: the author examines its shape, decorations, miniatures placed on its body, and the dedicatory inscription. The author infers that the throne chair dates back to the 15th–16th centuries, its original manufacturers were European masters working in Persia, and that new elements were added to the decor in a later period. Analyzing the ivory throne, the author draws an analogy between this throne and the throne of Maximianus of Ravenna (6th century), tracing the two chairs back to the legendary throne of King Solomon. Based on the analysis of the decor details, the author argues that the ivory throne appeared no earlier than in 1621. She hypothesizes that the throne has a Russian origin. The author describes the decoration of the throne and proves the idea that it was not the only piece of furniture decorated with ivory decor in the royal treasury. Based on the sources of the first half of the 17th century, the author describes a similar object – a “large ivory chair”, indicates the details that distinguish it from the ivory throne. She assumes that these two items are actually the same artifact dating back to the 14th century, which, during its existence, survived multiple reconstructions and changes, and took its final shape in the 1830s.
Los estilos APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.

Libros sobre el tema "Solomon' Palace"

1

1902-1979, Rodgers Richard, Hanser Richard, Bennett Robert Russell 1894-1981, Graves Leonard, Graves Peter 1926-2010, New Video Group, History Channel (Television network) et al., eds. Victory at sea: The legendary World War II documentary. 5a ed. [New York]: National Broadcasting Co., 2003.

Buscar texto completo
Los estilos APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
2

Richard, Hanser, Rodgers Richard 1902-1979, Graves Leonard, Graves Peter 1926-2010, National Broadcasting Company inc, Arts and Entertainment Network, NBC News, History Channel (Television network) y New Video Group, eds. Victory at sea: Vol. 2 : the legendary World War II documentary. 5a ed. New York: New Video, 2003.

Buscar texto completo
Los estilos APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
3

Sepowski, Stephen J., ed. The Ultimate Hint Book. Old Saybrook, CT: The Ultimate Game Club Ltd., 1991.

Buscar texto completo
Los estilos APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
4

Jacob Judah Aryeh Leon Templo. Accurate Description of the Grand and Glorious Temple of Solomon in Which Are Briefly Explain'd, I the Form of That Fabric II the Vessels and Instruments III the King's Palace IV Fort Antonio, F. Creative Media Partners, LLC, 2018.

Buscar texto completo
Los estilos APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
5

Lingerfelt, Bob. Solomon's Memory Palace: A Freemason's Guide to the Ancient Art of Memoria Verborum. Independently Published, 2019.

Buscar texto completo
Los estilos APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
6

Lingerfelt, Bob W. Solomon's Memory Palace: A Freemason's Guide to the Ancient Art of Memoria Verborum. Independently Published, 2018.

Buscar texto completo
Los estilos APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
7

van Nimwegen, Paul, Fiona Leverington, Stacey Jupiter y Marc Hockings, eds. Conserving our sea of islands: State of protected and conserved areas in Oceania. IUCN, International Union for Conservation of Nature, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.2305/iucn.ch.2022.08.en.

Texto completo
Resumen
This report is the first comprehensive regional assessment of protected and conserved areas in Oceania. This report covers the following countries and territories: American Samoa, Cook Islands, Federated States of Micronesia (FSM), Fiji, French Polynesia, Guam, Kiribati, Republic of the Marshall Islands (RMI), Nauru, New Caledonia, Niue, Northern Mariana Islands, Palau, Papua New Guinea (PNG), Pitcairn Islands, Samoa, Solomon Islands, Timor-Leste, Tokelau, Tonga, Tuvalu, Vanuatu, and the Wallis and Futuna Islands, (excludes Australia and New Zealand). The information presented in the report is designed to provide a comprehensive reference that countries and territories can use to assist on reporting against international frameworks for biodiversity conservation and environmental management and for national reporting. It can also serve as a key reference for identifying regional priorities for establishing new protected and conserved areas, strengthening existing management and governance arrangements, and supporting sustainable financing.
Los estilos APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.

Capítulos de libros sobre el tema "Solomon' Palace"

1

Lasine, Stuart. "Solomon and the Wizard of Oz: Power and Invisibility in a Verbal Palace". En The Age of Solomon, 375–91. BRILL, 1997. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/9789004667839_025.

Texto completo
Los estilos APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
2

Davis, Ellen F. "Wisdom, Power, Worship: Solomon’s Reign—1 Kings 1–12". En Opening Israel's Scriptures, 198–208. Oxford University Press, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190260545.003.0020.

Texto completo
Resumen
FOLLOWING THE REMARKABLY frank and intimate views of Saul’s tortured mind and David’s troubled family, the account of Solomon may at first seem dry by comparison. For the most part, reports of palace intrigue end with the death of David (1 Kgs 2:10–11). The inside view of Solomon’s reign focuses on something that has played little or no role in the preceding royal accounts: the apparatus of monarchy. The chapters treated here include a list of royal officials and regional prefects (4:1–19), almost certainly the oldest official document in the Bible. Included also are detailed reports on requisitions of food for the royal banquet table and fodder for the royal stables (5:2–8 Heb., 4:22–28 Eng.). Banqueting was an essential vehicle of diplomacy in the ancient world,...
Los estilos APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
3

"The Account of the Construction of Temple and Palace (1 Kgs. 6: 2–7: 52—3 Reg. 6: 2–7: 50)". En Two Versions of the Solomon Narrative, 131–41. BRILL, 2005. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/9789047405511_009.

Texto completo
Los estilos APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
4

Magness, Jodi. "Israelite Jerusalem (930 bce)". En Jerusalem through the Ages, 63–87. Oxford University PressNew York, 2024. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190937805.003.0004.

Texto completo
Resumen
Abstract After David’s conquest, Jerusalem became known as the “City of David.” David made the city the political capital of his kingdom (which some scholars argue was a small chiefdom), consisting of a coalition of the twelve Israelite tribes—the so-called United Kingdom. David also made Jerusalem the religious capital by transferring the Ark of the Covenant to the Temple Mount, a rocky outcrop that rises to the north of the southeastern hill. It was atop this natural high point that David’s son Solomon built the first temple to house the God of Israel and a new royal palace for himself.
Los estilos APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
5

Davis, Ellen F. "The Sovereignty of the Prophetic Word—1 Kings 13–21". En Opening Israel's Scriptures, 209–19. Oxford University Press, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190260545.003.0021.

Texto completo
Resumen
STARTING AT THE very end of Solomon’s reign, the center of gravity shifts from kings to prophets; the narrative refocuses attention away from palace intrigue and royal enterprises, including even war, as primary shapers of history. Rather, what comes to the fore is the sovereignty of the prophetic word itself, operating in ways that may go beyond the intentions and hopes of the prophet and sometimes run directly counter to them. The large body of narrative from Joshua to Kings is traditionally known as the ...
Los estilos APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
6

Dumont, Yvan, John Paul Redrobe y Rémi Quirion. "Neuropeptide Y receptors". En Understanding G protein-coupled receptors and their role in the CNS, 372–401. Oxford University PressOxford, 2002. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198509165.003.0019.

Texto completo
Resumen
Abstract Neuropeptide Y (NPY) was isolated from porcine brain almost two decades ago (Tatemoto and Mutt 1980). This 36 amino acid residues shares high sequence homology and structural identity with two other peptides, namely peptide YY (PYY) and pancreatic polypeptide (PP) (Tatemoto et al . 1982). All three peptides have thus been included in the same peptide family called the NPY family (Table 19.1). NPY is one of the most abundant peptide found in the central nervous system (CNS) of all mammals, including human (Chan-Palay et al . 1985; Chronwall et al . 1985) while PYY and PP are mostly found in endocrine cells of the intestine (Solomon 1985). Additionally PYY is present in the brainstem and various hypothalamic nuclei (Ekman et al . 1986). These peptides, especially NPY and PYY, are among the most conserved peptides during evolution (Larhammar 1996a ; Larhammar et al . 2001).
Los estilos APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
Ofrecemos descuentos en todos los planes premium para autores cuyas obras están incluidas en selecciones literarias temáticas. ¡Contáctenos para obtener un código promocional único!

Pasar a la bibliografía