Literatura académica sobre el tema "Scientific writing"
Crea una cita precisa en los estilos APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard y otros
Consulte las listas temáticas de artículos, libros, tesis, actas de conferencias y otras fuentes académicas sobre el tema "Scientific writing".
Junto a cada fuente en la lista de referencias hay un botón "Agregar a la bibliografía". Pulsa este botón, y generaremos automáticamente la referencia bibliográfica para la obra elegida en el estilo de cita que necesites: APA, MLA, Harvard, Vancouver, Chicago, etc.
También puede descargar el texto completo de la publicación académica en formato pdf y leer en línea su resumen siempre que esté disponible en los metadatos.
Artículos de revistas sobre el tema "Scientific writing"
Nileshwar, Anitha. "Scientific writing". Indian Journal of Respiratory Care 7, n.º 1 (2018): 1. http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijrc.ijrc_27_17.
Texto completoPollock, Neal W. "Scientific Writing". Wilderness & Environmental Medicine 28, n.º 4 (diciembre de 2017): 283–84. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wem.2017.09.007.
Texto completoHyland, Ken y Françoise Salager-Meyer. "Scientific writing". Annual Review of Information Science and Technology 42, n.º 1 (5 de noviembre de 2009): 297–338. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/aris.2008.1440420114.
Texto completoCO, Omolase. "Rudiments of Writing for Scientific Publication". Open Access Journal of Ophthalmology 6, n.º 1 (4 de enero de 2021): 1–4. http://dx.doi.org/10.23880/oajo-16000219.
Texto completoHolmes, Frederic L. "Scientific Writing and Scientific Discovery". Isis 78, n.º 2 (junio de 1987): 220–35. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/354391.
Texto completoMyers, Greg, Steve Woolgar, Jonathan Potter, Margaret Wetherell y Bruno Latour. "Writing about Writing about Scientific Writing: Books on the Sociology of Scientific Knowledge". College Composition and Communication 39, n.º 4 (diciembre de 1988): 465. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/357703.
Texto completoHerrick, M. J. "Medical scientific writing". Anaesthesia 50, n.º 12 (diciembre de 1995): 1100. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2044.1995.tb05978.x.
Texto completoVan Way, Charles W. "On Scientific Writing". Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition 31, n.º 3 (mayo de 2007): 259–60. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0148607107031003259.
Texto completoScott, Susannah L. y Christopher W. Jones. "Superlative Scientific Writing". ACS Catalysis 7, n.º 3 (22 de febrero de 2017): 2218–19. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.7b00566.
Texto completoGreene, Mott T. "Writing Scientific Biography". Journal of the History of Biology 40, n.º 4 (13 de abril de 2007): 727–59. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10739-007-9124-x.
Texto completoTesis sobre el tema "Scientific writing"
Knight, Amanda Margaret. "Students' abilities to critique scientific evidence when reading and writing scientific arguments". Thesis, Boston College, 2015. http://hdl.handle.net/2345/bc-ir:104146.
Texto completoScientific arguments are used to persuade others for explanations that make sense of the natural world. Over time, through the accumulation of evidence, one explanation for a scientific phenomenon tends to take precedence. In science education, arguments make students' thinking and reasoning visible while also supporting the development of their conceptual, procedural, and epistemic knowledge. As such, argumentation has become a goal within recent policy documents, including the Next Generation Science Standards, which, in turn, presents a need for comprehensive, effective, and scalable assessments. This dissertation used assessments that measure students' abilities to critique scientific evidence, which is measured in terms of the form of justification and the support of empirical evidence, when reading and writing scientific arguments. Cognitive interviews were then conducted with a subset of the students to explore the criteria they used to critique scientific evidence. Specifically, the research investigated what characteristics of scientific evidence the students preferred, how they critiqued both forms of justification and empirical evidence, and whether the four constructs represented four separate abilities. Findings suggest that students' prioritized the type of empirical evidence to the form of justification, and most often selected relevant-supporting justifications. When writing scientific arguments, most students constructed a justified claim, but struggled to justify their claims with empirical evidence. In comparison, when reading scientific arguments, students had trouble locating a justification when it was not empirical data. Additionally, it was more difficult for students to critique than identify or locate empirical evidence, and it was more difficult for students to identify than locate empirical evidence. Findings from the cognitive interviews suggest that students with more specific criteria tended to have more knowledge of the construct. Lastly, dimensional analyses suggest that these may not be four distinct constructs, which has important implications for curriculum development and instructional practice. Namely, teachers should attend to the critique of scientific evidence separately when reading and writing scientific arguments
Thesis (PhD) — Boston College, 2015
Submitted to: Boston College. Lynch School of Education
Discipline: Teacher Education, Special Education, Curriculum and Instruction
Nylén, Aletta y Christina Dörge. "Using competencies to structure scientific writing education". Universität Potsdam, 2013. http://opus.kobv.de/ubp/volltexte/2013/6485/.
Texto completoGallo, Katarzyna Zaruska. "Scaling Undergraduate Scientific Writing via Prominent Feature Analysis". Thesis, Mississippi State University, 2019. http://pqdtopen.proquest.com/#viewpdf?dispub=10974642.
Texto completoProminent Feature Analysis (PFA) is a reliable and valid writing assessment tool, derived from the writing it is used to assess. PFA, used to assess on-demand expository essays in Grades 3–12, uncovers positive and negative characteristics of a sample. To extend PFA to a new academic level and genre, I assessed scientific writing of 208 undergraduates, identifying 35 linguistic and 20 scientific prominent features. An essay could earn up to 28 positive (24 linguistic and four scientific), and up to 27 negative marks (11 linguistic and 16 scientific). The minimum prominent features number in a paper was 3, the maximum was 25 (M = 12.45, SD = 3.88). The highest positive and negative prominent features numbers noted were 17 (M = 4.11, SD = 3.96), and 16 (M = 8.34, SD = 3.25) respectively.
Rasch analysis revealed a good data-model fit, with item separation of 5.81 (.97 reliability). The estimated feature difficulty of items spanned over 10 logits; common errors were easier to avoid than “good writing” characteristics to exhibit. Significant correlations among linguistic, but not between linguistic and scientific features, suggest writing proficiency does not assure excellence in scientific writing in novices. Ten linguistic features significantly strongly and moderately inter-correlated with each other, appearing to represent writing proficiency. Student GPA correlated significantly with the raw prominent features scores (r = .37; p < .01), and negatively with the sum of negative linguistic features (r = –.40, p < .01), providing support for scale’s validity, and suggesting that good students are better at avoiding common writing errors than less able learners. Additionally, PFA scores positively significantly correlated with composite ACT scores.
To investigate PFA’s ability to track change in writing over time, I compared 2 sets of prominent features scores of 25 students. In comparison with earlier essays, later (longer) essays exhibited significantly more positive, and more negative features. Prominent features scores did not correlate significantly between the sets. This suggests, that while PFA is a valid and appropriate tool for analysis of undergraduate scientific writing, it was not suitable for tracking change in writing ability in this small sample.
Slawson, Deborah L. y Nicholas E. Hagemeier. "Scientific Writing. Mastering the Art of Verbal Communication". Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University, 2017. https://dc.etsu.edu/etsu-works/1416.
Texto completoErard, Michael-Jean. "Inscribing language : writing and scientific representation in American linguistics /". Full text (PDF) from UMI/Dissertation Abstracts International, 2000. http://wwwlib.umi.com/cr/utexas/fullcit?p3004259.
Texto completoHundleby, Margaret N. "What counts as technical writing?, a situated look at writing for technical and scientific purposes". Thesis, National Library of Canada = Bibliothèque nationale du Canada, 1999. http://www.collectionscanada.ca/obj/s4/f2/dsk3/ftp04/nq41053.pdf.
Texto completoKokt, D., L. Lategan y R. Dessels. "The Interim as developmental academic journal". Interim : Interdisciplinary Journal, Vol 11, Issue 1: Central University of Technology Free State Bloemfontein, 2012. http://hdl.handle.net/11462/327.
Texto completoResearch has two important objectives: the contribution to scientific discourse and the identification of solutions for the challenges societies, government, business and industry face. Research should be in the public domain. The publication and presentation of research results are important activities academics need to engage with. Through publications and presentations are societies informed of the positive influence and impact research can bring to them. This paper will focus on the importance of publications and how emerging scholars can be assisted to get their research published. A case study is presented of the Interim, an in-house academic journal.
Plappert, Gary Lee. "Phraseology and epistemology in scientific writing : a corpus-driven approach". Thesis, University of Birmingham, 2012. http://etheses.bham.ac.uk//id/eprint/3884/.
Texto completoCalmes, Jordan. "Mass spec : the biography of a scientific instrument". Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2011. http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/68473.
Texto completoCataloged from PDF version of thesis.
Includes bibliographical references (p. 36-37).
Over the past century, the mass spectrometer has become commonplace in scientific fields ranging from chemistry to geology to environmental science. Its ability to identify compounds and determine concentrations of those compounds leads to a wide variety of applications, from environmental monitoring to disease diagnosis. This thesis is meant to familiarize the non-scientist with the mass spectrometer. It illustrates the instrument's basic physical principles and the wide range of research that utilize mass spectrometry. The story discusses the development of the mass spectrometer from the early experiments of JJ Thomson to modern uses in proteomics and attempts to miniaturize the instrument.
by Jordan Calmes.
S.M.in Science Writing
Wickman, Chad. "Displays of Knowledge: Text Production and Media Reproduction in Scientific Practice". [Kent, Ohio] : Kent State University, 2009. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc%5Fnum=kent1247068612.
Texto completoTitle from OhioLINK ETD abstract webpage (viewed March 12, 2010). Advisor: Christina Haas. Keywords: Scientific writing; rhetoric of science; writing in the disciplines; multimodality; semiotics; visual rhetoric; technical writing; ethnography; workplace literacy. Includes bibliographical references.
Libros sobre el tema "Scientific writing"
1967-, Martin Jan, ed. A scientific approach to scientific writing. New York: Springer, 2011.
Buscar texto completoBlackwell, John y Jan Martin. A Scientific Approach to Scientific Writing. New York, NY: Springer New York, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-9788-3.
Texto completoS, Klompus Carl y Yarrison Betsy Greenleaf, eds. Scientific and technical writing. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, 1985.
Buscar texto completoSociety, European Astronomical, ed. Scientific writing for young astronomers: A collection of papers on scientific writing. Les Ulis Cedex A: EAS, EDP Sciences, 2011.
Buscar texto completoBetter scientific and technical writing. Englewood Cliffs, N.J., USA: Prentice Hall, 1988.
Buscar texto completoHandbook of scientific proposal writing. Boca Raton: Taylor & Francis, 2012.
Buscar texto completoA guide to scientific writing. 2a ed. Melbourne, Australia: Longman, 1995.
Buscar texto completoScientific writing: Thinking in words. Collingwood, VIC: CSIRO Pub., 2011.
Buscar texto completoThe craft of scientific writing. 3a ed. New York: Springer, 1996.
Buscar texto completoAlley, Michael. The craft of scientific writing. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1987.
Buscar texto completoCapítulos de libros sobre el tema "Scientific writing"
Colclough, David. "Scientific Writing". En A Companion to English Renaissance Literature and Culture, 565–75. Malden, MA, USA: Blackwell Publishers Ltd, 2007. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9780470998731.ch47.
Texto completoSmyth, T. R. "Scientific Writing". En The Principles of Writing in Psychology, 13–21. London: Macmillan Education UK, 2004. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-0-230-20886-5_2.
Texto completoErdnüß, Frank. "Scientific Writing". En Gut beraten durch die Promotion, 113–23. Wiesbaden: Gabler Verlag, 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-8349-3727-8_12.
Texto completoColclough, David. "Scientific Writing". En A New Companion to English Renaissance Literature and Culture, 150–59. Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell, 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9781444319019.ch11.
Texto completoGrant, Cora y Jan Van den Broeck. "Scientific Writing". En Epidemiology: Principles and Practical Guidelines, 539–55. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5989-3_28.
Texto completoAgger, Peter, Robert S. Stephenson y J. Michael Hasenkam. "Scientific Writing". En A Practical Guide to Biomedical Research, 151–56. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63582-8_17.
Texto completoLaplante, Phillip A. "Scientific Writing". En Technical Writing, 75–100. Second edition. | Boca Raton : Taylor & Francis, CRC Press, 2018. | Series: What every engineer should know: CRC Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1201/9780429467394-4.
Texto completoPeat, Jennifer, Elizabeth Elliott, Louise Baur y Victoria Keena. "Scientific Writing". En Scientific Writing Easy when you know how, 1–11. London, WC: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9781118708019.ch1.
Texto completoChasan-Taber, Lisa. "Scientific Writing". En Writing Grant Proposals in Epidemiology, Preventive Medicine, and Biostatistics, 57–68. 2a ed. Boca Raton: Chapman and Hall/CRC, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1201/9781003155140-6.
Texto completoIbrahim, Andrew M. y Amir A. Ghaferi. "Writing Scientific Manuscripts". En Health Services Research, 263–69. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28357-5_22.
Texto completoActas de conferencias sobre el tema "Scientific writing"
Basaglia, T., Z. W. Bell, P. V. Dressendorfer, A. Larkin y M. G. Pia. "Writing software or writing scientific articles?" En 2007 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record. IEEE, 2007. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/nssmic.2007.4436319.
Texto completoDixon, Adrian K. "Ethics and Scientific Misconduct". En 5th Regional Workshop on Medical Writing for Radiologists. Singapore: The Singapore Radiological Society, 2006. http://dx.doi.org/10.2349/biij.2.1.e14-79.
Texto completoPeh, Wilfred CG. "Basic Structure and Types of Scientific Papers". En 5th Regional Workshop on Medical Writing for Radiologists. Singapore: The Singapore Radiological Society, 2006. http://dx.doi.org/10.2349/biij.2.1.e14-59.
Texto completoPurves, Steve. "Collaborative & Connected Scientific Writing". En Engineering and Mining Geophysics 2021. European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.202152261.
Texto completoŠafranj, Jelisaveta, Marina Katić y Jelena Zivlak. "Classification in scientific and technical writing". En 10th International Symposium on Graphic Engineering and Design. University of Novi Sad, Faculty of technical sciences, Department of graphic engineering and design,, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.24867/grid-2020-p52.
Texto completoAleshinskaya, Evgeniya y Alexander Kurnayev. "ENHANCING SCIENTIFIC WRITING ACHIEVEMENT THROUGH PARAPHRASING". En 13th International Conference on Education and New Learning Technologies. IATED, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.21125/edulearn.2021.1027.
Texto completoSuprihatin, Dewi, Retno Winarni, Nugraheni Eko Wardani y Kundharu Saddhono. "Internalization of Local Wisdom in Scientific Writing with Scientific Approach". En ICLIQE 2020: The 4th International Conference on Learning Innovation and Quality Education. New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3452144.3452175.
Texto completoLamas, David, Vladimir Tomberg y Mart Laanpere. "A conceptual model for collaborative scientific writing". En CSCW '12: Computer Supported Cooperative Work. New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2141512.2141565.
Texto completoŠafranj, Jelisaveta, Vesna Bogdanović y Vesna Bulatović. "Paragraph development in scientific and technical writing". En 11th International Symposium on Graphic Engineering and Design. University of Novi Sad, Faculty of technical sciences, Department of graphic engineering and design, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.24867/grid-2022-p65.
Texto completoROSA, Rusdi Noor, Rudy SOFYAN y Bahagia TARIGAN. "Applying Metaphor in Writing English Scientific Texts". En Sixth International Conference on Languages and Arts (ICLA 2017). Paris, France: Atlantis Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.2991/icla-17.2018.12.
Texto completoInformes sobre el tema "Scientific writing"
KISELNOKOV, I. V. DIDACTIC CONDITIONS FOR ACTIVATION OF COGNITIVE ACTIVITY OF STUDENTS OF TECHNICAL HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS IN THE PROCESS OF TEACHING MATHEMATICS. Science and Innovation Center Publishing House, abril de 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.12731/2658-4034-2022-13-1-2-26-39.
Texto completoMONAKO, T. P. PROFESSIONALLY-ORIENTED TRAINING OF MANAGERS BY METHODS OF MATHEMATICS. Science and Innovation Center Publishing House, abril de 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.12731/2658-4034-2022-13-1-2-40-44.
Texto completoSklenar, Ihor. The newspaper «Christian Voice» (Munich) in the postwar period: history, thematic range of expression, leading authors and publicists. Ivan Franko National University of Lviv, febrero de 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.30970/vjo.2022.51.11393.
Texto completoMelnyk, Olesia. MEDIA DISCOURSE AROUND THE FIGURE OF ORIANA FALLACHI AND HER JOURNALISM DURING 2017–2020. Ivan Franko National University of Lviv, marzo de 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.30970/vjo.2021.50.11114.
Texto completoSemerikov, Serhiy O., Illia O. Teplytskyi, Yuliia V. Yechkalo y Arnold E. Kiv. Computer Simulation of Neural Networks Using Spreadsheets: The Dawn of the Age of Camelot. [б. в.], noviembre de 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.31812/123456789/2648.
Texto completoChornodon, Myroslava. FEAUTURES OF GENDER IN MODERN MASS MEDIA. Ivan Franko National University of Lviv, febrero de 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.30970/vjo.2021.49.11064.
Texto completo