Literatura académica sobre el tema "Relazione possessiva"

Nonostante le grandi conquiste della modernità, nonostante il suo evidente sforzo per collocare l’individuo al centro e il mondo in periferia, il discorso giuridico è nato e si è sviluppato sotto il segno dell’individualismo possessivo. La libertà di ogni individuo può essere legittimamente limitata solo dagli obblighi e dalle forme che sono necessari per assicurare agli altri la stessa libertà. La società consiste in una serie di relazioni mercantili e più in particolare è un’invenzione dell’uomo per la tutela della libertà individuale della propria persona e dei beni e, quindi, per il mantenimento di relazioni di scambio disciplinate tra gli individui, considerati come proprietari di sé stessi. Entrambe le pretese dell’epoca moderna – il diritto è solo diritto privato/il diritto è solo diritto pubblico – non riescono a dare conto delle infinite sfumature di cui si compone la giuridicità. Per questo motivo, l’odierna giustificazione della obbligatorietà delle norme deve essere in grado di integrare le fondamentali acquisizioni del moderno con quei principi essenziali del vivere civile – come, ad esempio, la solidarietà – che la stessa modernità ha messo tra parentesi e rinnegato. Parole-chiave

In questo articolo, tentiamo di guardare a quattro temi di bioetica attraverso gli occhi del Piccolo Principe: il contesto di fine vita, la relazione medico-paziente, l’etica dell’organizzazione, la prevenzione/precauzione. Useremo un prospettiva che abbiamo chiamato “Medicina dell’Invisibile”, focalizzata sul valore. Il Piccolo Principe ci suggerisce di cercare l’invisibile come un nuovo tipo di “dato clinico” che può aiutare a rendere l’intervento assistenziale più etico ed efficace. Tale invisibile – che è la «cosa importante», la «cosa seria», anche su un piano gnoseologico ed epistemologico – è raggiungibile solo all’interno di una relazione. Perciò, il medico ha bisogno di essere “addomesticato” dal paziente, e il paziente dal medico – ognuno diventando responsabile dell’altro, ognuno diventando se stesso attraverso il dialogo con l’altro. Ma responsabilità significa anche attenzione al futuro, verso minacce alla vita che sono ancora ignote. Infatti, il Piccolo Principe ci insegna che possedere una parte di mondo – il “possesso utile” – implica l’imperativo etico di agire, al fine di salvaguardare la vita. Ma, senza la concretezza di una relazione – impregnata di tempo vissuto, di esperienze condivise, e dell’unicità individuale – non si dà alcun significato né valore. Per questo motivo la Medicina dell’Invisibile ricorda alla Bioetica che «quello che è importante, non lo si vede». ---------- In this paper, we attempt to look at four bioethical issues through the Little Prince’s eyes: the end-life context, the patient-physician relationship, the organization ethics, the prevention/precaution. We will use a perspective we have called “Medicine of the Invisible”, that is value-focused. The Little Prince suggests us to seek the invisible as a new type of ‘clinical data’ which may help to make the healthcare intervention more ethical and effective. Such an invisible – the “thing that is important”, the “matters of consequence”, even on a gnoseological and epistemological level – is attainable only within a relationship. Therefore, the physician needs to be tamed by the patient, and the patient by the physician – each one becoming responsible of the other, each one becoming himself through the dialogue with the other. But responsibility also means attention towards the future, against threats to life that are still unseen and unknown. Indeed, the Little Prince teaches us that owning a part of the world – the “useful possession” – entails the ethical imperative to act, in order to safeguard life. But, without the concreteness of a relationship – saturated with lived time, shared experiences, and individual’s uniqueness – no meaning and no value is given. For this reason the Medicine of Invisible reminds Bioethics that «the thing that is important is the thing that is not seen».

Tesi Il concetto di detenzione dell’attività o dell’investimento estero, che costituisce il presupposto per l’applicazione dell’intera disciplina del monitoraggio, si sostanzia in una relazione di fatto, effettiva ed attuale, tra detentore ed investimento estero, che deve sussistere sia nel caso di possesso diretto che nei casi, individuati dal secondo periodo dell’art. 4, comma 1, di possesso indiretto o mediato. La nozione di titolarità effettiva, che assieme alla detenzione mediante possesso indiretto costituisce l’altro requisito richiesto dal secondo periodo dell’art. 4 comma 1, ha quale attributo caratteristico il potere di dirigere verso se stessi il vantaggio conseguibile attraverso l’investimento o l’attività finanziaria estera. «Beneficiari individuati o facilmente individuabili»: non è sufficiente la mera menzione all’interno dell’atto istitutivo del trust, ma ne vanno rintracciati nel caso concreto i poteri nei confronti dell’attribuzione, che devono essere assimilabili ad una detenzione mediante possesso indiretto, tale da integrare altresì gli estremi della titolarità effettiva. Necessità di interpretare sistematicamente i due periodi del comma 1 dell’art. 4 - riferendo il requisito della detenzione anche ai casi evidenziati dal secondo periodo - e diversità della estensione soggettiva degli obblighi di monitoraggio rispetto alla disciplina antiriciclaggio, stante la distanza negli obiettivi e nelle finalità che intercorre tra le due normative. The author’s view The notion of detention of the foreign asset or investment, which is the premise for the application of the entire tax monitoring discipline, consists in a concrete, actual and effective relationship between the holder and the foreign investment. That relationship must exist both in the case of direct ownership and in the cases, identified by the second sentence of Article 4, paragraph 1, of indirect or mediated ownership. The concept of beneficial ownership, which, together with indirect ownership, constitutes the other requirement set forth by the second period of Article 4, paragraph 1, has a distinctive attribute the power to direct to oneself the advantage that can be obtained through foreign investment or financial activity. «Identified or easily identifiable beneficiaries»: the mere mention in the trust deed is not sufficient, but the powers in respect of the attribution must be traced in the specific case, which must be embodied to a holding through indirect possession, such as to also integrate the requirements of actual ownership. The need for a systematic interpretation of the two periods of paragraph 1 of Article 4 - i.e. referring the requirement of possession also to the cases highlighted by the second period - and the diversity of the subjective extension of the monitoring duties in comparison with the AML discipline, given the distance in goals and purposes between the two regulations.

<p>La storiografia incentrata sul tema della Cassa per il Mezzogiorno è molto ampia e si sviluppa in relazione non solo alle questioni generali riguardanti l’intervento straordinario, ma anche alle molteplici forme di articolazione settoriale e territoriale dell’iniziativa pubblica per la ripresa e lo sviluppo del Sud. Una ricostruzione puntuale delle vicende della Cassa, che per oltre un quarantennio– anche se con diversità di impostazione nelle varie fasi –ha operato come strumento delle strategie per lo sviluppo del Mezzogiorno, richiede un impegno molto approfondito. Tuttavia, anche senza effettuare una dettagliata cronistoria dell’attività dell’Ente, si può ricomporre una visione d’insieme, attraverso l’interpretazione di un modello di intervento pubblico collegato strettamente agli eventi economici concreti e all’andamento dei processi di industrializzazione che hanno interessato i territori meridionali.</p><p>La scelta di una prospettiva di lungo periodo, imperniata sull’analisi dell’intervento straordinario nel suo complesso, ha permesso un giudizio più equilibrato su tutta l’epoca dell’azione “aggiuntiva” dello Stato per il recupero del divario meridionale, superando eccessive semplificazioni nella valutazione di quell’esperienza e confutando pareri sommari sui suoi risultati, spesso privi di fondamento. Al tempo stesso, una visione ampia ha fatto emergere un percorso in grado di associare il caso della Cassa per il Mezzogiorno, controverso e difficile, ma considerato anche un modello tra i più avanzati a livello internazionale, a un tema di grande importanza, come quello delle politiche di sviluppo adottate per affrontare i problemi dell’arretratezza economica e per avviare a soluzione i dilemmi del dualismo.</p><p>L’analisi effettuata ha provato l’esistenza di un indiscutibile progresso economico nel periodo della <em>golden age</em>. Durante quell’epoca di prosperità non solo si realizzò un notevole avanzamento delle aree del Paese che già possedevano un’armatura industriale, ma si ottenne, contemporaneamente, il risultato, per nulla scontato, di una modernizzazione della struttura economica del Mezzogiorno –attraverso la politica delle opere pubbliche, prima, e dell’industrializzazione vera e propria, poi– nonché, di un recupero del divario accumulato con le regioni settentrionali. In questo modo, l’intervento straordinario, indirizzato verso obiettivi macroeconomici e guidato da una tecnostruttura come quella della Cassa, al tempo stesso autonoma e reattiva alle scelte strategiche del governo, si dimostrò lo strumento più efficace e innovativo per fare dell’Italia intera una potenza industriale. L’allontanamento da questi esiti, nella fase successiva dominata dalla crisi petrolifera e dalle politiche di ristrutturazione industriale, pur determinando una netta inversione di tendenza, non ha messo in discussione il valore dell’esperienza iniziale della Cassa per il Mezzogiorno, capace di aprire la strada alla crescita economica italiana negli anni del <em>boom</em>.</p><p>Historiography focusing on the Cassa per il Mezzogiorno is indeed vast and developed not only in regard to the main issues concerning the extraordinary intervention, but also to the various sectorial and territorial articulations public interventions for the recovery of Southern Italy undertook. Achieving a punctual reconstruction of the goings-on of the Cassa, an istitution that, for more than forty years –despite some differences in planning during its various phases– operated as an instrument to implement the strategies focusing on developing Southern Italy, requires a very deep commitment. However, an effective overall view can be reconstructed by interpreting a public intervention model strictly linked to the concrete economic events and to the trends of those industrial processes implemented in Southern Italy, even without going through a detailed chronicle of this entity.</p><p>The choice of a long-term perspective, focused on the analysis of the extraordinary intervention in its entirety, allowed for a more balanced evaluation of all the era regarding the “supplementary” actions the Italian State carried out to bridge the gap of its Southern regions, going beyond the exaggerated simplifications plaguing the evaluations of such an experience and confuting those hasty, often baseless, judgments on the results it achieved. At the same time, a wide viewpoint on the matter let a research path emerge, able to link the specific case of the Cassa per il Mezzogiorno, itself difficult and controversial, while being considered one of the most advanced models internationally, with a very significant theme, such as the development policies implemented to tackle the problems of economic backwardness and to begin solving the dilemmas brought by the dualism.</p><p>The analysis which was carried out proved the existence of an unquestionable economic progress during the <em>golden age</em>. In that era of prosperity, not only did the areas in Italy already possessing a significant industrial presence experience significant advancement, all the while, the result, by no means granted, of a modernized economic structure in Southern Italy was achieved –first through a policy focused on public works and then by true forms of industrialization– and of a significant recovery of the gap the area had towards the Northern regions of Italy. Thus, the extraordinary intervention, focused on macroeconomic goals and driven by a technical structure such as the Cassa, itself autonomous and reacting towards governmental choices at the same time, revealed itself to be the most effective and innovative tool in turning the whole of Italy into an industrial power. The departure from such results in the following phase, dominated by the oil crisis and by the policies of industrial reconstruction, despite triggering a significant trend inversion, never questioned the value of the Cassa per il Mezzogiorno’s initial experience, which was able to open and show the way to economical growth, during the Italian <em>boom </em>years.</p>

Anders Toftgaard: “Perhaps even this distress it will some day be a joy to recall”. On Giacomo Castelvetro’s manuscripts in The Royal Library, Copenhagen. In exile from his beloved Modena, Giacomo Castelvetro (1546–1616) travelled in a Europe marked by Reformation, counter-Reformation and wars of religion. He transmitted the best of Italian Renaissance culture to the court of James VI and Queen Anna of Denmark in Edinburgh, to the court of Christian IV in Copenhagen and to Shakespeare’s London, while he incessantly collected manuscripts on Italian literature and European contemporary history. Giacomo Castelvetro lived in Denmark from August 1594 to 11 October 1595. Various manuscripts and books which belonged to Giacomo Castelvetro in his lifetime, are now kept in the Royal Library in Copenhagen. Some of them might have been in Denmark ever since Castelvetro left Denmark in 1595. Nevertheless, Giacomo Castelvetro has never been noticed by Danish scholars studying the cultural context in which he lived. The purpose of this article is to point to Castelvetro’s presence in Denmark in the period around Christian IV’s accession and to describe two of his unique manuscripts in the collection of the Royal Library. The Royal Library in Copenhagen holds a copy of the first printed Italian translation of the Quran, L’Alcorano di Macometto, nel qual si contiene la dottrina, la vita, i costumi et le leggi sue published by Andrea Arrivabene in Venice in 1547. The title page bears the name of the owner: Giacº Castelvetri. The copy was already in the library’s collections at the time of the Danish King Frederic III, in the 1660’s. The three manuscripts from the Old Royal collection (GKS), GKS 2052 4º, GKS 2053 4º and GKS 2057 4º are written partly or entirely in the hand of Giacomo Castelvetro. Moreover, a number of letters written to Giacomo Castelvetro while he was still in Edinburgh are kept among letters addressed to Jonas Charisius, the learned secretary in the Foreign Chancellery and son in law of Petrus Severinus (shelf mark NKS (New Royal Collection) 1305 2º). These letters have been dealt with by Giuseppe Migliorato who also transcribed two of them. GKS 2052 4º The manuscript GKS 2052 4º (which is now accessible in a digital facsimile on the Royal Library’s website), contains a collection of Italian proverbs explained by Giacomo Castelvetro. It is dedicated to Niels Krag, who was ambassador of the Danish King to the Scottish court, and it is dated 6 August 1593. The title page shows the following beautifully written text: Il Significato D’Alquanti belli & vari proverbi dell’Italica Favella, gia fatto da G. C. M. & hoggi riscritto, & donato,in segno di perpetua amicitia, all ecc.te.D. di legge, Il S.r. Nicolò Crachio Ambas.re. del Ser.mo Re di Dania a questa Corona, & Sig.r mio sempre osser.mo Forsan & haec olim meminisse iuvabit Nella Citta d’Edimborgo A VI d’Agosto 1593 The manuscript consists of 96 leaves. On the last page of the manuscript the title is repeated with a little variation in the colophon: Qui finisce il Significato D’alquanti proverbi italiani, hoggi rescritto a requisitione del S.r. Nicolo Crachio eccelente Dottore delle civili leggi &c. Since the author was concealed under the initials G.C.M., the manuscript has never before been described and never attributed to Giacomo Castelvetro. However, in the margin of the title page, a 16th century hand has added: ”Giacomo Castelvetri modonese”, and the entire manuscript is written in Giacomo Castelvetro’s characteristic hand. The motto ”Forsan et haec olim meminisse iuvabit” is from Vergil’s Aeneid (I, 203); and in the Loeb edition it is rendered “Perhaps even this distress it will some day be a joy to recall”. The motto appears on all of the manuscripts that Giacomo Castelvetro copied in Copenhagen. The manuscript was evidently offered to Professor Niels Krag (ca. 1550–1602), who was in Edinburgh in 1593, from May to August, as an ambassador of the Danish King. On the 1st of August, he was knighted by James VI for his brave behaviour when Bothwell entered the King’s chamber in the end of July. The Danish Public Record Office holds Niels Krag’s official diary from the journey, signed by Sten Bilde and Niels Krag. It clearly states that they left Edinburgh on August 6th, the day in which Niels Krag was given the manuscript. Evidently, Castelvetro was one of the many persons celebrating the ambassadors at their departure. The manuscript is bound in parchment with gilded edges, and a gilded frame and central arabesque on both front cover and end cover. There are 417 entries in the collection of proverbs, and in the explanations Giacomo Castelvetro often uses other proverbs and phrases. The explanations are most vivid, when Castelvetro explains the use of a proverb by a tale in the tradition of the Italian novella or by an experience from his own life. The historical persons mentioned are the main characters of the sixteenth century’s religious drama, such as Henry VIII, Edward VI, Mary I, Elizabeth, James VI, Henry Howard, Earl of Surrey, and his son, Thomas Howard, 4th Duke of Norfolk, Gaspard de Coligny and the Guise family, Mary Stuart, Don Antonio, King of Portugal, the Earl of Bothwell and Cosimo de’ Medici. The Catholic Church is referred to as “Setta papesca”, and Luther is referred to as “il grande, e pio Lutero” (f. 49v). Giovanni Boccaccio and Francesco Petrarca are referred to various times, along with Antonio Cornazzano (ca. 1430–1483/84), the author of Proverbi in facetie, while Brunetto Latini, Giovanni Villani, Ovid and Vergil each are mentioned once. Many of the explanations are frivolous, and quite a few of them involve priests and monks. The origin of the phrase “Meglio è tardi, che non mai” (52v, “better late than never”) is explained by a story about a monk who experienced sex for the first time at the age of 44. In contrast to some of the texts to be found in the manuscript GKS 2057 4º the texts in GKS 2052 4º, are not misogynist, rather the opposite. Castelvetro’s collection of proverbs is a hitherto unknown work. It contains only a tenth of the number of proverbs listed in Gardine of recreation (1591) by John Florio (1553?–1625), but by contrast these explanations can be used, on the one hand, as a means to an anthropological investigation of the past and on the other hand they give us precious information about the life of Giacomo Castelvetro. For instance he cites a work of his, “Il ragionamento del Viandante” (f. 82r), which he hopes to see printed one day. It most probably never was printed. GKS 2057 4º The manuscript GKS 2057 4º gathers a number of quires in very different sizes. The 458 folios in modern foliation plus end sheets are bound in blue marbled paper (covering a previous binding in parchment) which would seem to be from the 17th century. The content spans from notes to readyforprint-manuscripts. The manuscript contains text by poets from Ludovico Castelvetro’s generation, poems by poets from Modena, texts tied to the reformation and a lot of satirical and polemical material. Just like some of Giacomo Castelvetro’s manuscripts which are now in the possession of Trinity College Library and the British Library it has “been bound up in the greatest disorder” (cf. Butler 1950, p. 23, n. 75). Far from everything is written in the hand of Giacomo Castelvetro, but everything is tied to him apart from one quire (ff. 184–192) written in French in (or after) 1639. The first part contains ”Annotationi sopra i sonetti del Bembo” by Ludovico Castelvetro, (which has already been studied by Alberto Roncaccia), a didactic poem in terza rima about rhetoric, “de’ precetti delle partitioni oratorie” by “Filippo Valentino Modonese” , “rescritto in Basilea a XI di Febraio 1580 per Giacº Castelvetri” and the Ars poetica by Horace translated in Italian. These texts are followed by satirical letters by Nicolò Franco (“alle puttane” and “alla lucerna” with their responses), by La Zaffetta, a sadistic, satirical poem about a Venetian courtisane who is punished by her lover by means of a gang rape by thirty one men, and by Il Manganello (f. 123–148r), an anonymous, misogynistic work. The manuscript also contains a dialogue which would seem to have been written by Giacomo Castelvetro, “Un’amichevole ragionamento di due veri amici, che sentono il contrario d’uno terzo loro amico”, some religious considerations written shortly after Ludovico’s death, ”essempio d’uno pio sermone et d’una Christiana lettera” and an Italian translation of parts of Erasmus’ Colloquia (the dedication to Frobenius and the two dialogues ”De votis temere susceptis” and ”De captandis sacerdotiis” under the title Dimestichi ragionamenti di Desiderio Erasmo Roterodamo, ff. 377r–380r), and an Italian translation of the psalms number 1, 19, 30, 51, 91. The dominating part is, however, Italian poetry. There is encomiastic poetry dedicated to Trifon Gabriele and Sperone Speroni and poetry written by poets such as Torquato Tasso, Bernardo Tasso, Giulio Coccapani, Ridolfo Arlotti, Francesco Ambrosio/ Ambrogio, Gabriele Falloppia, Alessandro Melani and Gasparo Bernuzzi Parmigiano. Some of the quires are part of a planned edition of poets from Castelvetro’s home town, Modena. On the covers of the quires we find the following handwritten notes: f. 276r: Volume secondo delle poesie de poeti modonesi f. 335v: VII vol. Delle opere de poeti modonesi f. 336v; 3º vol. Dell’opere de poeti modonesi f. 353: X volume dell’opre de poeti modonesi In the last part of the manuscript there is a long discourse by Sperone Speroni, “Oratione del Sr. Sperone, fatta in morte della S.ra Giulia Varana Duchessa d’Urbino”, followed by a discourse on the soul by Paulus Manutius. Finally, among the satirical texts we find quotes (in Latin) from the Psalms used as lines by different members of the French court in a humoristic dialogue, and a selection of graffiti from the walls of Padua during the conflict between the city council and the students in 1580. On fol. 383v there is a ”Memoriale d’alcuni epitafi ridiculosi”, and in the very last part of the manuscript there is a certain number of pasquinate. When Castelvetro was arrested in Venice in 1611, the ambassador Dudley Carleton described Castelvetro’s utter luck in a letter to Sir Robert Cecil, stating that if he, Carleton, had not been able to remove the most compromising texts from his dwelling, Giacomo Castelvetro would inevitably have lost his life: “It was my good fortune to recover his books and papers a little before the Officers of the Inquisition went to his lodging to seize them, for I caused them to be brought unto me upon the first news of his apprehension, under cover of some writings of mine which he had in his hands. And this indeed was the poore man’s safetie, for if they had made themselves masters of that Magazine, wherein was store and provision of all sorts of pasquins, libels, relations, layde up for many years together against their master the Pope, nothing could have saved him” Parts of GKS 2057 4º fit well into this description of Castelvetro’s papers. A proper and detailed description of the manuscript can now be found in Fund og Forskning Online. Provenance GKS 2052 4ºon the one side, and on the other side, GKS 2053 4º and GKS 2057 4º have entered The Royal Library by two different routes. None of the three manuscripts are found in the oldest list of manuscripts in the Royal Library, called Schumacher’s list, dating from 1665. All three of them are included in Jon Erichsen’s “View over the old Manuscript Collection” published in 1786, so they must have entered the collections between 1660 and 1786. Both GKS 2053 4º and GKS 2057 4º have entered The Royal Library from Christian Reitzer’s library in 1721. In the handwritten catalogue of Reitzer’s library (The Royal Library’s archive, E 15, vol. 1, a catalogue with very detailed entries), they bear the numbers 5744 and 5748. If one were to proceed, one would have to identify the library from which these two manuscripts have entered Reitzer’s library. On the spine of GKS 2053 4º there is a label saying “Castelvetro / sopra Dante vol 326” and on f. 2r the same number is repeated: “v. 326”. On the spine of GKS 2057 4º, there is a label saying “Poesie italiane, vol. 241”, and on the end sheet the same number is repeated: “v. 241”. These two manuscripts would thus seem to have belonged to the same former library. Many of the Royal Library’s manuscripts with relazioni derive from Christian Reitzer’s library, and a wide range of Italian manuscripts which have entered the Royal Library through Reitzer’s library have a similar numbering on spine and title page. Comparing these numbers with library catalogues from the 17th century, one might be able to identify the library from which these manuscripts entered Reitzer’s library, and I hope to be able to proceed in this direction. Conclusion Giacomo Castelvetro was not a major Italian Renaissance writer, but a nephew of one of the lesser-known writers in Italian literature, Ludovico Castelvetro. He delivered yet another Italian contribution to the history of Christian IV, and his presence could be seen as a sign of a budding Italianism in Denmark in the era of Christian IV. The collection of Italian proverbs that he offered to Niels Krag, makes him a predecessor of the Frenchman Daniel Matras (1598–1689), who as a teacher of French and Italian at the Academy in Sorø in 1633 published a parallel edition of French, Danish, Italian and German proverbs. The two manuscripts that are being dealt with in this article are two very different manuscripts. GKS 2052 4º is a perfectly completed work that was hitherto unknown and now joins the short list of known completed works by Giacomo Castelvetro. GKS 2057 4º is a collection of variegated texts that have attracted Giacomo Castelvetro for many different reasons. Together the two manuscripts testify to the varied use of manuscripts in Renaissance Italy and Europe. A typical formulation of Giacomo Castelvetro’s is “Riscritto”. He copies texts in order to give them a new life in a new context. Giacomo Castelvetro is in the word’s finest sense a disseminator of Italian humanism and European Renaissance culture. He disseminated it in a geographical sense, by his teaching in Northern Europe, and in a temporal sense through his preservation of texts for posterity under the motto: “Perhaps even this distress it will some day be a joy to recall”.

Il lavoro ha come oggetto l'analisi morfo-sintattica di un corpus di carte documentarie latine redatte nell'Italia centro-settentrionale tra il VII e l'VIII secolo. Lo studio si concentra sul sintagma nominale e in particolare sulla concorrenza tra la codifica sintetica e analitica del nome dipendente; tale situazione si inserisce nel lungo processo di grammaticalizzazione del sintagma introdotto dalla preposizione de per la funzione adnominale, iniziato nella fase arcaica del latino e conclusosi solo in epoca romanza. Per l'interpretazione del mutamento risultano fondamentali le motivazioni semantiche, legate principalmente al dominio funzionale del possesso. Una parte importante del lavoro è inoltre dedicato all'analisi della morfologia nominale osservabile nelle carte longobarde; nonostante l'elevato polimorfismo e l'incoerenza che caratterizzano la lingua notarile alto-medievale, vengono messi in luce il livellamento delle opposizioni casuali e la ricostruzione di paradigmi flessivi, processi inversi che trovano motivazione nel principio semantico dell'animatezza. This work offers a morpho-syntactic analysis of a corpus of Latin notarial charters written in northern and central Italy in the Early Middle Ages. The focus is on the concurrence between the synthetic and the analytical encoding of the modifier in the noun phrase. This concurrence represents a stage in the grammaticalization of the prepositional phrase headed by de as an adnominal modifier, a long-lasting process, fully accomplished only in the Romance languages. The interpretation offered in this work relies on semantics and makes use of the functional domain of possession. An important section of the work is devoted to the analysis of the noun inflection attested in the Lombard documents. Despite the highly formulaic and inconsistent language usage, I show on the one hand the dismission of the Latin case system, on the other the reconstruction of the nominal paradigms. Both processes can be semantically motivated with reference to the animacy parameter.