Literatura académica sobre el tema "Public land Law"
Crea una cita precisa en los estilos APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard y otros
Consulte las listas temáticas de artículos, libros, tesis, actas de conferencias y otras fuentes académicas sobre el tema "Public land Law".
Junto a cada fuente en la lista de referencias hay un botón "Agregar a la bibliografía". Pulsa este botón, y generaremos automáticamente la referencia bibliográfica para la obra elegida en el estilo de cita que necesites: APA, MLA, Harvard, Vancouver, Chicago, etc.
También puede descargar el texto completo de la publicación académica en formato pdf y leer en línea su resumen siempre que esté disponible en los metadatos.
Artículos de revistas sobre el tema "Public land Law"
Ivanov, Anton A. "Soil — Land Parcel — Land — Territory". Zakon 21, n.º 5 (mayo de 2024): 38–45. http://dx.doi.org/10.37239/0869-4400-2024-21-5-38-45.
Texto completoKim, Nam-Wook. "The footsteps of administrative law and public land law - Focusing on land planning law -". Korean Public Land Law Association 87 (30 de agosto de 2019): 259–85. http://dx.doi.org/10.30933/kpllr.2019.87.259.
Texto completoHarris, Grant A., George Comeron Coggins y Charles F. Wilkinson. "Federal Public Land and Resources Law". Journal of Range Management 40, n.º 4 (julio de 1987): 383. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3898748.
Texto completoKrishnasanti, Trischa Galuh y Made Widya Prasasti. "Land Bank as Land Provision Agency in Land Procurement for Public Interest". Jurnal Hukum Prasada 10, n.º 1 (14 de marzo de 2023): 59–68. http://dx.doi.org/10.22225/jhp.10.1.2022.59-68.
Texto completoHajrah, Hassan Hamza. "Public Land Distribution in Saudi Arabia". Arab Law Quarterly 1, n.º 3 (mayo de 1986): 359. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3381761.
Texto completoPyle, Lizbeth A. y Rutherford H. Platt. "Land Use Control: Geography, Law, and Public Policy". Geographical Review 83, n.º 1 (enero de 1993): 92. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/215385.
Texto completoZhu, Ying-Ping. "The Protection of Land in Chinese Public Law". KOOKMIN LAW REVIEW 19, n.º ll (febrero de 2007): 47–73. http://dx.doi.org/10.17251/legal.2007.19..47.
Texto completoCobb, Rodney L. "Land-Use Law: Marred by Public Agency Abuse". Land Use Law & Zoning Digest 52, n.º 11 (noviembre de 2000): 3–10. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00947598.2000.10396043.
Texto completoJackson, Richard H. "Land use control: Geography, law and public policy". Land Use Policy 9, n.º 4 (octubre de 1992): 306–7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0264-8377(92)90010-t.
Texto completoMertes, James D. "Land use control geography, law and public policy". Landscape and Urban Planning 23, n.º 1 (diciembre de 1992): 72–73. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0169-2046(92)90066-9.
Texto completoTesis sobre el tema "Public land Law"
Luwaya, Nolundi. "Understanding women's claim to land in an Eastern Cape Village". Master's thesis, University of Cape Town, 2018. http://hdl.handle.net/11427/29793.
Texto completoMasudul, Haque A. K. M. "Critical reflections on law and public enterprises in Bangladesh". Thesis, University of Warwick, 1991. http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/108768/.
Texto completoPaterson, Alexander R. "Bridging the gap between conservation and land reform : communally-conserved areas as a tool for managing South Africa's natural commons". Doctoral thesis, University of Cape Town, 2011. http://hdl.handle.net/11427/11498.
Texto completoIncludes bibliographical references (p. 370-417).
This dissertation examines whether the concept of communally-conserved areas provides a useful tool for bridging the current apparent impasse between South Africa’s conservation and land reform agendas.
Butler, Christopher y n/a. "Law and the Social Production of Space". Griffith University. Griffith Law School, 2004. http://www4.gu.edu.au:8080/adt-root/public/adt-QGU20040521.141805.
Texto completoSwart, Charl. "Public opinion on land reform in South Africa". Thesis, Stellenbosch : Stellenbosch University, 2010. http://hdl.handle.net/10019.1/4377.
Texto completoENGLISH ABSTRACT: This study explores public opinion on land reform in South Africa using data gathered by Ipsos-Markinor in nationally representative public opinion surveys conducted in 2004 and 2007, and by an elite survey conducted by Centre for International and Comparative Politics in 2007. This study explores whether public opinion on land reform reveals distinct trends that correlate with the selected socio-demographic variables of race, language, party affiliation and social status. It is hypothesised that there is an identifiable correlation between these independent variables and the opinions of respondents on land reform, with specific groups tending to support land reform whilst other groups tend to reject it. The data analyses yielded results that highlight distinct trends in public opinion on land reform. Responses are clustered around specific characteristics of the independent variables and point towards distinct groups having specific views on land reform. From this set of findings it is inferred that public opinion on land reform illustrates that certain groups of South Africans have contrasting views of how the rule of law and transformation should find expression in a democratic society. These fundamentally differing opinions on key elements of democracy illustrate that South Africans hold diverging opinions of what constitutes democracy, through adherence to either the liberal or the liberationist model of democracy. These models were previously identified as two distinct and diverging interpretations of democracy in South Africa and were labelled as such. These two models uphold sharply divergent normative prescriptions of democracy, as well as contrasting prescriptions for various policies of democratic consolidation, including that of land reform.
AFRIKAANSE OPSOMMING: Openbare mening oor grondhervorming in Suid-Afrika word in hierdie studie ondersoek. Die ondersoek maak gebruik van data ingewin deur Ipsos-Markinor in nasionaal verteenwoordigende openbare meningsopnames uitgevoer in 2004 en 2007, asook ‘n elite opname wat in 2007 uitgevoer is deur die Sentrum vir Internationale en Vergelykende Politiek (CICP). Hierdie studie ondersoek die moontlikheid dat openbare mening ten opsigte van grondhervorming met geselekteerde sosio-demografiese veranderlikes (ras, taal, politieke affiliasie en sosiale status) korreleer. Die hipotese is dat daar ‘n identifiseerbare korrelasie is tussen hierdie onafhanklike veranderlikes en die menings van die respondente ten opsigte van grondhervorming en dat daar spesifieke groepe is wat grondhervorming ondersteun en ander nie. Analise van die data toon duidelike tendense in openbare mening oor die kwessie van grondhervorming. Menings korreleer wel met die onafhanklike veranderlikes en wys daarop dat bepaalde sosiale groepe uiteenlopende standpunte het oor grondhervorming. Uit hierdie stel bevindinge maak die navorser die afleiding dat daar, binne die Suid- Afrikaanse bevolking, groepe is met uiteenlopende menings oor hoe die oppergesag van die reg en transformasie binne ‘n demokrasie uitgeleef moet word. Hierdie fundamenteel kontrasterende menings ten opsigte van hierdie sleutelelemente van demokrasie, illustreer dat Suid-Afrikaners uiteenlopende menings oor demokrasie het in die vorm van ondersteuning van hetsy die liberale- of bevrydingsmodelle van demokrasie. Hierdie modelle is as twee duidelike en afsonderlike interpretasies van demokrasie voorgestel en beskryf. Hierdie twee modelle verteenwoordig skerp uiteenlopende normatiewe beskouinge oor demokrasie, en bied daarmee saam, botsende beleidsvoorskrifte aan vir demokratiese konsolidering, insluitende beleid oor grondhervorming.
Radbone, Ian. "A history of land transport regulation in South Australia : the relevance of public choice theory". Title page, contents and summary only, 1989. http://web4.library.adelaide.edu.au/theses/09PH/09phr124.pdf.
Texto completoGoodwin, David Pell y n/a. "Belonging knows no boundaries : persisting land tenure custom for Shona, Ndebele and Ngai Tahu". University of Otago. Department of Surveying, 2008. http://adt.otago.ac.nz./public/adt-NZDU20080807.151921.
Texto completoDavis, James Joe. "The Effects of Coalition Building on Public Law 93-531: The Navajo and Hopi Land Settlement Act of 1974". Diss., Tucson, Ariz. : University of Arizona, 2005. http://etd.library.arizona.edu/etd/GetFileServlet?file=file:///data1/pdf/etd/azu%5Fetd%5F1278%5F1%5Fm.pdf&type=application/pdf.
Texto completoVan, Meter Heather J. "Sustainable development and public international institutions : lessons from the mining industry". Thesis, University of Birmingham, 2017. http://etheses.bham.ac.uk//id/eprint/7753/.
Texto completoGerber, Johannes Abraham. "A golden midway for a divided society? : the South African land reform project and its relationship with the rule of law and transformation". Thesis, Stellenbosch : Stellenbosch University, 2004. http://hdl.handle.net/10019.1/49821.
Texto completoENGLISH ABSTRACT: South Africa's history led to an unequal distribution in land ownership, which is not conducive to democratic consolidation. Land refortn is the means to address this problem. However, land reform, part of the larger process of transformation, is a potentially dangerous process: it can have negative implications on the rule of law. The objective of this study is to provide an analysis of the dynamic relationship between land reform, the rule of law and transformation in South Africa, within the debate on democratic consolidation. One can distinguish two paradigms regarding democracy: the liberal paradigm and the liberationist paradigm. These two paradigms have divergent views on the way land reform and transformation should be implemented, and what the goal of these two processes is. The liberal paradigm would seem to be more favourable for democratic consolidation, while the liberationist paradigm is a breeding ground for populist transformation. Furthermore, the negotiated constitutional settlement has left land reform with an ambiguity. On the one hand the constitution forces the govemment to address land reform, but on the other hand it firmly entrenches the private property rights by enforcing the 'willing buyer, willing seller' principle, which makes the process more costly and time consuming. The main hypothesis of this study is: Demographic indicators (race, party affiliation and provincial setting) influence support or rejection of the land reform policies of the South African govemment. Tbe dependent variable is 'support or rejection of the government's land reform policies'. Support for the govemment's land reform policies is indicative of the liberal paradigm and rejection of the govemment's policies is indicative of the liberationist paradigm. It is found that the majority of South Africans reject the govemment's land reform policies. However, strong divisions are evident. Respondents differ along racial, party affiliation and provincial lines. Thus, the liberationist paradigm dominates, but the liberal paradigm has a strong presence, creating an ideologically divided society. This means that the legitimacy of South Africa's land reform project, as well as the legitimacy of the constitution, is under stress. This does not bode well for democratic consolidation, as the rule of law is under severe threat. Thus, one can conclude that land reform is not going to make a positive contribution to the consolidation of South Africa's democracy, if a substantial financial injection is not found to increase the efficiency of the process.
AFRIKAANSE OPSOMMING: Suid-Afrika se geskiedenis het aanleiding gegee tot 'n ongelyke verspreiding van grondeienaarskap. Dit is nie gunstig vir demokratiese konsolidasie nie. Grondhervorming IS die mamer waarmee die probleem aangespreek kan word. Grondhervorming, deel van die groter proses van transformasie, is egter 'n potensieel gevaarlike proses: dit kan negatiewe implikasies vir regsoewereiniteit hê. Die doel van hierdie tesis is om 'n analise van die dinamiese wisselwerking tussen grondhervorming, regsoewereiniteit en transformasie te verskaf, binne die debat oor demokratiese konsolidasie. Daar kan aangaande demokrasie tussen twee paradigmas onderskei word: die liberale paradigma en die bevrydings (liberationist) paradigma. Hierdie twee paradigmas het teenstrydige perspektiewe oor die manier waarop grondhervorming, sowel as transformasie, geïmplementeer behoort te word, sowel as wat die doel van hierdie twee prosesse is. Die liberale paradigma is meer geskik vir demokratiese konsolidasie, terwyl die bevrydings paradigma 'n teelaarde vir populistiese transformasie is. Verder het die onderhandelde grondwetlike skikking grondhervorming in 'n teenstrydigheid geplaas. Aan die een kant vereis die grondwet dat die regering grondhervorming moet aanspreek, maar aan die anderkant bied dit 'n ferm onderskraging van private eiedomsreg deur op die 'gewillige koper, gewillige verkoper' beginsel aan te dring. Dit maak die grondhervormings proses langer en duurder. Die hoof hipotese van die studie is: Demografiese indikatore (ras, partyaffiliasie en provinsie) beïnvloed ondersteuning of verwerpmg van die regering se grondhervormingsbeleid. Die afhanklike veranderlike IS 'ondersteuning of verwerping van die regering se grondhervormingsbeleid '. Ondersteuning van die regering se grondhervormingsbeleid dui op die liberale paradigma, en die verwerping daarvan dui op die bevrydings paradigma. Daar word bevind dat die meerderheid Suid-Afrikaners die regenng se Respondente verskil volgens ras, partyaffiliasie en provinsie. Dus, die bevrydings paradigma domineer, maar die liberale paradigma het ook 'n sterk teenwoordigheid. Dit sorg vir 'n ideologies verdeelde samelewing. Dit beteken dat die legitimiteit van Suid-Afrika se grondhervormings projek, sowel as die legitimiteit van die grondwet, in gedrang is. Dit is nie 'n goeie teken vir demokratiese konsolidasie nie, aangesien dit regsoewereiniteit in die gedrang bring. Daarom kan daar tot die gevolg gekom word dat grondhervorming nie 'n positiewe bydrae ten opsigte van die konsolidasie van Suid-Afrikaanse demokrasie sal maak nie, tensy daar 'n beduidende finansiële inspuiting gevind kan word.
Libros sobre el tema "Public land Law"
Rocky Mountain Mineral Law Foundation., ed. Public land law. [Denver, CO: The Foundation], 1992.
Buscar texto completoRocky Mountain Mineral Law Foundation. y American Bar Association. Committee on Public Lands and Land Use., eds. Public land law II. [Denver, CO: The Foundation], 1997.
Buscar texto completoKennett, Steven Alexander. New directions for public land law. Calgary: Canadian Institute of Resources Law, 1998.
Buscar texto completoBaynard, Ernest C. Public land law and procedure. New York: Wiley Law Publications, 1986.
Buscar texto completoCasper, Dale E. Public lands and public policy: Law and legislation, 1983-1988. Monticello, Ill., USA: Vance Bibliographies, 1989.
Buscar texto completo1941-, Wilkinson Charles F., ed. Federal public land and resources law. 2a ed. Mineola, N.Y: Foundation Press, 1987.
Buscar texto completoCoggins, George Cameron. Federal public land and resources law. 4a ed. New York: Foundation Press, 2001.
Buscar texto completoCoggins, George Cameron. Federal public land and resources law. 5a ed. New York: Foundation Press, 2002.
Buscar texto completoCoggins, George Cameron. Federal public land and resources law. 3a ed. Westbury, N.Y: Foundation Press, 1993.
Buscar texto completo1941-, Coggins George Cameron, ed. Federal public land and resources law. 6a ed. New York: Foundation Press, 2007.
Buscar texto completoCapítulos de libros sobre el tema "Public land Law"
Brown, Marvin T. "The Sharecropper’s Story and An Ethics for Environmentalism". En Library of Public Policy and Public Administration, 117–33. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-77363-2_8.
Texto completoLee, Ming-Chih. "Public-interest requirements of zone expropriation in Taiwan*". En Land Law and Disputes in Asia, 115–27. London: Routledge, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781003170600-9.
Texto completoHassan, Abdul. "Land acquisition for public purpose under Fiji Law". En Routledge Handbook of Contemporary Issues in Expropriation, 247–61. Abingdon, Oxon [UK]; New York, NY: Routledge, 2018.: Routledge, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1201/9781315749167-12.
Texto completoOellers-Frahm, Karin y Andreas Zimmermann. "Case Concerning Sovereignty over Certain Frontier Land (Belgium/Netherlands), Special Agreement of March 7, 1957". En Dispute Settlement in Public International Law, 2077–78. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2001. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-56626-4_110.
Texto completoOellers-Frahm, Karin y Andreas Zimmermann. "Land, Island and Maritime Frontier Dispute (El Salvador/Honduras), Special Agreement of December 11, 1986". En Dispute Settlement in Public International Law, 2094–96. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2001. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-56626-4_116.
Texto completoBeaman, Lori G. "A Christian nation and the land of the free". En The Transition of Religion to Culture in Law and Public Discourse, 91–125. Abingdon, Oxon ; New York, NY : Routledge, 2020. | Series: ICLARS series on law and religion: Routledge, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781003007319-4.
Texto completoAminaka, Akiyo. "Politics of Land Resource Management in Mozambique". En African Land Reform Under Economic Liberalisation, 111–35. Singapore: Springer Singapore, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-4725-3_6.
Texto completoFukui, Hideo. "Real Estate and the Legal System of Japan". En New Frontiers in Regional Science: Asian Perspectives, 3–7. Singapore: Springer Singapore, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-8848-8_1.
Texto completoMohamed-Katerere, Jennifer Clare. "Mutually-Reinforcing Transgressions of Justice in Large Scale Land Acquisitions in the ‘Public Interest’". En International Yearbook of Soil Law and Policy 2020/2021, 17–45. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-96347-7_2.
Texto completoTrask, Brandon. "Standard Concerns: An Examination of Public Interest Considerations with Respect to Prosecutions of Environmental Advocates and Indigenous Land Defenders". En Green Criminology and the Law, 19–38. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-82412-9_2.
Texto completoActas de conferencias sobre el tema "Public land Law"
Sakharova, Yulia y Anzhelika Molodkova. "CERTAIN TYPES OF LAND TRANSACTIONS". En MODERN PROBLEMS AND PROSPECTS OF DEVELOPMENT PRIVATE LAW AND PUBLIC LAW REGULATION. Baskir State University, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.33184/spprchppr-2022-04-22.50.
Texto completoQiongli, Ma. "Study on Law Violations concerning Facility Agricultural Land in Yunnan Province". En Fifth International Conference on Public Management : International Collaboration for Innovated Public Governance (ICPM 2018). Paris, France: Atlantis Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.2991/icpm-18.2018.51.
Texto completoMustakimov, Nail. "WAYS TO PROTECT THE RIGHTS OF OWNERS OF LAND USERS, LANDOWNERS AND TENANTS OF LAND PLOTS IN THE FIELD OF ENTREPRENEURSHIP". En MODERN PROBLEMS AND PROSPECTS OF DEVELOPMENT PRIVATE LAW AND PUBLIC LAW REGULATION. Baskir State University, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.33184/spprchppr-2022-04-22.40.
Texto completoPolyanskaya, Natalya. "CURRENT PROBLEMS IN THE FIELD OF LAND AND PROPERTY RELATIONS". En MODERN PROBLEMS AND PROSPECTS OF DEVELOPMENT PRIVATE LAW AND PUBLIC LAW REGULATION. Baskir State University, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.33184/spprchppr-2022-04-22.46.
Texto completoMa, Qiongli. "Study on Land Law Enforcement Agency Team Building in Underdeveloped West China". En 2016 International Conference on Public Management. Paris, France: Atlantis Press, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.2991/icpm-16.2016.57.
Texto completoKovalenko, Julia. "PROBLEMS AND THE DEVELOPMENT PROSPECTS FOR THE MEETINGS INSTITUTION DECISIONS OF THE CO-OWNERS OF AGRICULTURAL LAND". En MODERN PROBLEMS AND PROSPECTS OF DEVELOPMENT PRIVATE LAW AND PUBLIC LAW REGULATION. Baskir State University, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.33184/spprchppr-2022-04-22.31.
Texto completoSusilo, Sri Herowanti. "Reclamation as Land Procurement Efforts for Development for Public Interest". En The 2nd International Conference of Law, Government and Social Justice (ICOLGAS 2020). Paris, France: Atlantis Press, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.201209.350.
Texto completoWardhani, Dwi, Faisal Santiago y Evita Israhadi. "Law Renewal on the Process of Leftover Land Compensation in Land Aquisition for Construction in Public Necessity". En Proceedings of the 2nd Multidisciplinary International Conference, MIC 2022, 12 November 2022, Semarang, Central Java, Indonesia. EAI, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.4108/eai.12-11-2022.2327302.
Texto completoSusilo, Sri. "Reclaimed Land in Relation to Land Acquisition for Development in The Public Interest (Law Number 2 of 2012)". En Proceedings of the First International Conference of Science, Engineering and Technology, ICSET 2019, November 23 2019, Jakarta, Indonesia. EAI, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.4108/eai.23-11-2019.2301594.
Texto completoMahfud, Muh, Ani Purwanti y Dyah Wijaningsih. "A Critical Appraisal of Agricultural Land Conversion for Land Procurement for the Public Interest and National Strategic Projects". En Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Law, Economics and Governance, IWLEG 2022, 27 July 2022, Semarang, Indonesia. EAI, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.4108/eai.27-7-2022.2326266.
Texto completoInformes sobre el tema "Public land Law"
Ashley, Caitlyn, Elizabeth Spencer Berthiaume, Philip Berzin, Rikki Blassingame, Stephanie Bradley Fryer, John Cox, E. Samuel Crecelius et al. Law and Policy Resource Guide: A Survey of Eminent Domain Law in Texas and the Nation. Editado por Gabriel Eckstein. Texas A&M University School of Law Program in Natural Resources Systems, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.37419/eenrs.eminentdomainguide.
Texto completoBolton, Laura. Criminal Activity and Deforestation in Latin America. Institute of Development Studies (IDS), diciembre de 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.19088/k4d.2021.003.
Texto completoJones, David, Roy Cook, John Sovell, Matt Ley, Hannah Shepler, David Weinzimmer y Carlos Linares. Natural resource condition assessment: Lincoln Boyhood National Memorial. National Park Service, 2024. http://dx.doi.org/10.36967/2301822.
Texto completoCanto, Patricia, ed. Ongizatea helburu duen lehiakortasuna: desgaitasuna duten pertsonen gizarte eta lanerako inklusiorako euskal ereduaren ekarpena. Universidad de Deusto, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.18543/tylj9428.
Texto completoNyirakamana, Colette, Vanessa van den Boogaard y Warsame Ahmed. Land and Property Taxation to Finance Urban Development in Somaliland: Challenges and Prospects for Reform. Institute of Development Studies, agosto de 2024. http://dx.doi.org/10.19088/ictd.2024.083.
Texto completoAyala, David, Ashley Graves, Colton Lauer, Henrik Strand, Chad Taylor, Kyle Weldon y Ryan Wood. Flooding Events Post Hurricane Harvey: Potential Liability for Dam and Reservoir Operators and Recommendations Moving Forward. Editado por Gabriel Eckstein. Texas A&M University School of Law Program in Natural Resources Systems, septiembre de 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.37419/eenrs.floodingpostharvey.
Texto completoWong Barrantes, Rudy y Miguel Palomino Bonilla. Housing Finance in Peru: What Is Holding It Back? Inter-American Development Bank, noviembre de 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.18235/0008966.
Texto completoThiemermann, Andre y Florian Groß. Identification of logistics land and examination of location patterns – the Rhineland metropolitan region case. Preprint, 2024. http://dx.doi.org/10.26128/2024.18.
Texto completoCheeseman, Kathryn. Disaster Preparedness in the Bangsamoro Autonomous Region in Muslim Mindanao (BARMM). Institute of Development Studies, julio de 2024. http://dx.doi.org/10.19088/k4dd.2024.030.
Texto completoAdsit, Sarah E., Theodora Konstantinou, Konstantina Gkritza y Jon D. Fricker. Public Acceptance of INDOT’s Traffic Engineering Treatments and Services. Purdue University, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.5703/1288284317280.
Texto completo