Libros sobre el tema "Property dispute"

Commission, Queensland Law Reform. Shared property: Resolving property disputes between people who live together and share property. North Quay, Queensland: The Commission, 1991.

Canadian Bar Association. National Intellectual Property Section., Canadian Bar Association. National Alternative Dispute Resolution Section., Canadian Bar Association. National Continuing Legal Education Committee. y Canadian Bar Association. Continuing Legal Education. Conference, eds. Symposium on intellectual property alternative dispute resolution. Ottawa: Association du barreau canadadien [i.e. canadien], 2002.

Webster, G. C. The use of alternative dispute resolution in resolving intellectual property disputes in South Africa. Pretoria: Centre for Business Law, University of South Africa, 1995.

Samaras, Harrie. ADR in intellectual property cases. Chicago: American Bar Association, 2011.

Matthias, Sonntag y Wilske Stephan 1962-, eds. Intellectual property law in Germany: Protection, enforcement and dispute resolution. München: Beck, 2008.

Institute, Pennsylvania Bar, ed. ADR & IP disputes. Mechanicsburg, PA (5080 Ritter Rd., Mechanicsburg 17055-6903): Pennsylvania Bar Institute, 2004.

Field, Martha A. Legal reform in Central America: Dispute resolution and property systems. Cambridge, Mass: John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, 2001.

Rose, Laurel L. Disputes in common property regimes (CPR's). Madison: Land Tenure Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1996.

Samaras, Harrie. ADR advocacy, strategies, and practice: For in intellectual property cases. Chicago: American Bar Association, 2011.

Mekanisme penyelesaian sengketa HaKI (Hak atas Kekayaan Intelektual). Surakarta, Jawa Tengah: Sebelas Maret University Press, 2004.

Eksistensi dan penyelesaian sengketa HaKI. Surakarta, Jawa Tengah, Indonesia: Kerja sama Lembaga Pengembangan Pendidikan (LPP) dan UPT Penerbitan dan Pencetakan UNS (UNS Press), Universitas Sebelas Maret, 2007.

American Bar Association. Section of Real Property, Probate and Trust Law., ed. Managing the bottom line: Strategic use of ADR in real estate transactions. [Chicago, Ill.]: American Bar Association, 1997.

1957-, Herman Denise Madigan, Arnold Tom y American Bar Association. Section of Intellectual Property Law., eds. What is ADR?: A guide for the IP lawyer. [Chicago]: Section of Intellectual Property Law, American Bar Association, 2000.

Jamal. Penetapan sementara pengadilan: Pada hak kekayaan intelektual. Bandung, Jawa Barat: Pustaka Reka Cipta, 2008.

Jamal. Penetapan sementara pengadilan: Pada hak kekayaan intelektual. Bandung, Jawa Barat: Pustaka Reka Cipta, 2008.

Kenkyūjo, Chiteki Zaisan. Chiteki zaisan funsō no jinsoku katsu jikkōseiaru kaiketsu ni muketa ADR no seibi ni kansuru chōsa kenkyū hōkokusho. Tōkyō: Chiteki Zaisan Kenkyūjo, 2001.

M, Koneck John y American Bar Association. Section of Real Property, Probate, and Trust Law., eds. The ABC'S of ADR: A primer on alternative dispute resolution for real estate lawyers : Sunday, August 7, 1994, New Orleans, Louisiana. [Chicago]: The Association, 1994.

Jamal. Penetapan sementara pengadilan: Pada hak kekayaan intelektual. Bandung, Jawa Barat: Pustaka Reka Cipta, 2008.

Thailand. Kānrangap khō̜phiphāt dān sapsin thāng panyā: Khō̜bangkhap, lakkēn læ withī patibat. Nonthaburī: Krom Sapsin thāng Panyā, Krasūang Phānit, 2000.

Kenkyūjo, Chiteki Zaisan. Chiteki zaisan funsō o meguru kokusaiteki na shokadai ni kansuru chōsa kenkyū hōkokusho. Tōkyō: Chiteki Zaisan Kenkyūjo, 2002.

Shifting landmarks: Property, proof, and dispute in Catalonia around the year 1000. Ithaca, N.Y: Cornell University Press, 2003.

Craig, Tyler M., ed. Intellectual property dispute resolution: Leading lawyers on performing due diligence, pursuing the right ADR approach, and settling infringement claims / [M. Craig Tyler ... et al.]. [Boston, Mass.]: Aspatore Books, 2008.

Sachetana Information Centre (Calcutta, India), ed. Women, land, and law: Dispute resolution at the village level. Calcutta: Sachetana Information Centre, 2000.

Villalon, L. J. Andrew. The law's delay : the anatomy of an aristocratic property dispute (1350-1577). Ann Arbor, MI: University Microfilms International, 1985.

P, Ryan Michael. Interim report on judicial capacity regarding intellectual property: Enforcement and dispute settlement. [Washington, D.C.]: International Intellectual Property Institute, 2002.

Shiozaki, Tsutomu. Fudōsan kankei soshō. Tōkyō: Minjihō Kenkyūkai, 2010.

Wu quan jiu fen cai pan biao zhun gui fan: Juridical standard of property dispute. Beijing Shi: Ren min fa yuan chu ban she, 2009.

WIPO Worldwide Forum on the Arbitration of Intellectual Property Disputes (1994 Geneva, Switzerland). Worldwide Forum on the Arbitration of Intellectual Property Disputes. Geneva: WIPO, 1994.

Commerce, International Chamber of, ed. We must talk because we can: Mediating international intellectual property disputes. Paris, France: International Chamber of Commerce, 2008.

Điệp, Nguyẽ̂n Ngọc. Tìm hiẻ̂u pháp luật phỏ̂ thông cách thức khié̂u kiện và tranh chá̂p đá̂t đai đúng pháp luật. [Thành phó̂ Hò̂ Chí Minh]: Nhà xuá̂t bản Thành phó̂ Hò̂ Chí Minh, 2001.

Zhi shi chan quan guo ji jiu fen de fei su song jie jue yan jiu. Beijing Shi: Fa lü chu ban she, 2010.

Plant, David W. We must talk because we can: Mediating international intellectual property disputes. Paris, France: International Chamber of Commerce, 2008.

United States. Congress. House. Committee on the Judiciary. Subcommittee on Intellectual Property and Judicial Administration. Alternative dispute resolution programs: Hearing before the Subcommittee on Intellectual Property and Judicial Administration of the Committee on the Judiciary, House of Representatives, One Hundred Second Congress, second session, May 20, 1992. Washington: U.S. G.P.O., 1993.

Fang di chan jiu fen cai pan biao zhun gui fan: Juridical standard of real estate dispute. Beijing Shi: Ren min fa yuan chu ban she, 2009.

Patento mafia ga Nihon o nerau: Nichi-Bei tokkyo funsō no naimaku. Tōkyō: Dōbun Shoin, 1993.

Resolving disputes in cultural property: La résolution des litiges en matière de biens culturels. Zurich: Schulthess, 2012.

ʻAbbādī, Aḥmad ʻUwaydī. Jarāʼim al-ṣughrá ʻinda al-ʻashāʼir al-Urdunīyah (1900-1986). ʻAmmān: Dār al-Fikr, 1987.

ʻAbbādī, Aḥmad ʻUwaydī. Jarāʾim al-ṣughrá ʻinda al-ʻashāʾir al-Urdunīyah (1900-1986). ʻAmmān: Dār al-Fikr, 1987.

Salles, Venicio Antonio de Paula. Direito registral imobiliário. São Paulo, SP: Editora Saraiva, 2006.

Venicio Antonio de Paula Salles. Direito registral imobiliário. 2^a ed. São Paulo, SP: Editora Saraiva, 2007.

Real estate dispute resolution: Leading lawyers on selecting and implementing the best resolution method. [Boston, Mass.]: Aspatore, 2012.

Pathways of justice and equity in land administration and dispute resolution in Uganda: Perspectives of Ugandan civil society organisations. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: [KIT (Royal tropical Institute)], 2014.

Guo ji zhi shi chan quan zheng yi jie jue ji zhi yan jiu: A study on resolution mechanism for international intellectual property disputes. Beijing: Zhong guo Zheng fa Da xue Chu ban she, 2011.

Nong cun tu di jiu fen duo yuan hua jie jue ji zhi yan jiu. Xiamen: Xiamen da xue chu ban she, 2019.

Maryland Business and Technology Court Task Force. Report. [Annapolis, Md: Maryland General Assembly, 2000.

United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. Subcommittee on Forests and Public Land Management. Nez Perce Indian Reservation property dispute: Hearing before the Subcommittee on Forests and Public Land Management of the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources, United States Senate, One Hundred Fourth Congress, first session, on the Nez Perce Indian Reservation property dispute, Lewiston, ID, July 5, 1995. Washington: U.S. G.P.O., 1995.

Bruce, John W. Legal bases for the management of forest resources as common property. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, 1999.

Administration, United States Congress House Committee on the Judiciary Subcommittee on Intellectual Property and Judicial. Court Arbitration Authorization Act of 1993: Hearing before the Subcommittee on Intellectual Property and Judicial Administration of the Committee on the Judiciary, House of Representatives, One Hundred Third Congress, first session, on H.R. 1102, the Court Arbitration Authorization Act of 1993, May 5, 1993. Washington: U.S. G.P.O., 1993.

United States. Congress. House. Committee on the Judiciary. Subcommittee on Intellectual Property and Judicial Administration. Court Arbitration Authorization Act of 1993: Hearing before the Subcommittee on Intellectual Property and Judicial Administration of the Committee on the Judiciary, House of Representatives, One Hundred Third Congress, first session, on H.R. 1102, the Court Arbitration Authorization Act of 1993, May 5, 1993. Washington: U.S. G.P.O., 1994.

United States. Congress. House. Committee on the Judiciary. Subcommittee on Intellectual Property and Judicial Administration. Court Arbitration Authorization Act of 1993: Hearing before the Subcommittee on Intellectual Property and Judicial Administration of the Committee on the Judiciary, House of Representatives, One Hundred Third Congress, first session, on H.R. 1102, the Court Arbitration Authorization Act of 1993, May 5, 1993. Washington: U.S. G.P.O., 1993.