Literatura académica sobre el tema "Precut papillotomy"

Crea una cita precisa en los estilos APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard y otros

Elija tipo de fuente:

Consulte las listas temáticas de artículos, libros, tesis, actas de conferencias y otras fuentes académicas sobre el tema "Precut papillotomy".

Junto a cada fuente en la lista de referencias hay un botón "Agregar a la bibliografía". Pulsa este botón, y generaremos automáticamente la referencia bibliográfica para la obra elegida en el estilo de cita que necesites: APA, MLA, Harvard, Vancouver, Chicago, etc.

También puede descargar el texto completo de la publicación académica en formato pdf y leer en línea su resumen siempre que esté disponible en los metadatos.

Artículos de revistas sobre el tema "Precut papillotomy"

1

Park, S.-H. y TH Lee. "Precut Papillotomy with Isolated-Tip Needle-Knife Papillotome". Video Journal and Encyclopedia of GI Endoscopy 1, n.º 2 (octubre de 2013): 523–25. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s2212-0971(13)70229-2.

Texto completo
Los estilos APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
2

Palm, Jukka, Arto Saarela y Jyrki M??kel?? "Safety of Erlangen Precut Papillotomy". Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology 41, n.º 5 (mayo de 2007): 528–33. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/mcg.0b013e31802b8728.

Texto completo
Los estilos APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
3

Conio, Massimo, Sebastiano Saccomanno, Hugo Aste y Vittorio Pugliese. "Precut papillotomy: primum non nocere". Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 36, n.º 5 (septiembre de 1990): 544. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0016-5107(90)71150-9.

Texto completo
Los estilos APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
4

Wilcox, C. Mel y Klaus F. Mönkemüller. "Wire-assisted minor papilla precut papillotomy". Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 54, n.º 1 (julio de 2001): 83–86. http://dx.doi.org/10.1067/mge.2001.115474.

Texto completo
Los estilos APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
5

Huibregtse, K., R. M. Katon y G. N. J. Tytgat. "Precut papillotomy via fine-needle knife papillotome: a safe and effective technique". Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 32, n.º 6 (diciembre de 1986): 403–5. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0016-5107(86)71921-4.

Texto completo
Los estilos APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
6

Miyatani, Hiroyuki y Yukio Yoshida. "Endoscopic Needle Knife Precut Papillotomy for Inaccessible Bile Duct following Failed Pancreatic Duct Access". Clinical Medicine. Gastroenterology 2 (16 de diciembre de 2008): CGast.S1120. http://dx.doi.org/10.4137/cgast.s1120.

Texto completo
Resumen
Aims To evaluate the safety, effectiveness, success rate and complications of needle knife precut papillotomy for inaccessible bile duct after failed pancreatic ducts access. Methods Selective common bile duct cannulation was required for 582 patients from November 2004 to May 2008. Precut sphincterotomy was performed in 28 patients (16 male, 12 female; mean age 71). When standard bile duct cannulation was unsuccessful after more than 20 minutes, the bile duct was considered inaccessible. Group A consisted of patients where pancreatic duct access was possible and transpancreatic papillary septotomy was performed (20 patients). If pancreatic duct cannulation also failed, needle knife precut method was performed and these patients belonged to group B (8 patients). The success and complication rates of the two groups were compared using the Chi-square test. Results The success rates were 85% and 87.5% respectively. Of the 28 patients in group A, 6 had mild to moderate pancreatitis and one patient had mild bleeding. The complication rates were 35% and 0% respectively and the differences were not significant. Conclusion Needle knife precut papillotomy is useful and acceptable in patients after failed pancreatic duct access.
Los estilos APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
7

Zimmon, DS. "Endoscopic sphincterotomy - The basics". Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology 4, n.º 9 (1990): 559–63. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/1990/691410.

Texto completo
Resumen
Endoscopic sphincterotomy refers to the incision of the terminal portion of the biliary or pancreatic ducts by a variety of techniques, depending on anatomic circumstances, goals and risks. Alternative methods include percutaneous transhepatic or surgical techniques. The initial Erlangen method - complete sphinccerotomy - carried an unavoidable risk of perforation and hemorrhage. Fractional incision or 'endoscopic papillotomy' - incision of the inferior sphincter - carries no risk of hemorrhage or perforation, done properly. Techniques of papillotomy including 'pull,' 'precut,' stent placement, infundibulotomy, percutaneous cholangiography, and internal spring wire are described, and general electrosurgical principles discussed.
Los estilos APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
8

Liang, Yun-Xiao. "Needle-knife precut papillotomy for difficult biliary cannulation". World Chinese Journal of Digestology 22, n.º 8 (2014): 1153. http://dx.doi.org/10.11569/wcjd.v22.i8.1153.

Texto completo
Los estilos APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
9

Cárdenas, A. y G. Fernández-Esparrach. "Precut Papillotomy for Access into the Bile Duct". Video Journal and Encyclopedia of GI Endoscopy 1, n.º 2 (octubre de 2013): 520–22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s2212-0971(13)70228-0.

Texto completo
Los estilos APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
10

Cotton, Peter B. "Precut papillotomy—a risky technique for experts only". Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 35, n.º 6 (noviembre de 1989): 578–79. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0016-5107(89)72921-7.

Texto completo
Los estilos APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.

Tesis sobre el tema "Precut papillotomy"

1

DAMINI, Federica. "Efficacy and safety of precut sphincterotomy for therapeutic ERCP: a prospective study in a tertiary referral center". Doctoral thesis, 2012. http://hdl.handle.net/11562/396539.

Texto completo
Resumen
BACKGROUND: La colangiografia retrograda endoscopica (ERCP) con intento terapeutico richiede l’incannulazione selettiva della via biliare principale e/o del dotto pancreatico. Se tale incannulazione fallisce, si pone la scelta se utilizzare tecniche più invasive (es. precut della papilla) o interrompere l’esame e procedere con metodiche alternative (es. PTBD). OBIETTIVI: Confrontare il tasso di successo e di complicanze della papillotomia-precut e della sfinterotomia endoscopica (EST) standard. In caso di insuccesso dell’ERCP, valutare i trattamenti utilizzati e le complicanze ad essi correlate. METODI: Nel nostro centro ospedaliero e universitario di riferimento per la patologia pancreatica, tra gennaio 2007 e aprile 2010 è stato condotto uno studio prospettico osservazionale sui pazienti sottoposti a ERCP. Sono stati considerati due gruppi: a) tutti i pazienti sottoposti a papillotomia precut; b) un sottogruppo di pazienti sottoposti a EST standard (selezionando consecutivamente un paziente ogni quattro). La misura di esito primaria è stata considerare il tasso di successo e di complicanze della varie metodiche. RISULTATI: Sono state eseguite in totale 783 ERCP, delle quali 755 con intento terapeutico. La papillotomia precut è stata praticata nel 17.3% di tutte le ERCP terapeutiche (131/755; 51.1% femmine; età media 65.5±13.7 anni). Il tasso di successo globale è stato del 73.3% (96/131) con una variabilità tra operatori che va dal 63.1% all’83.3%. Il tasso di complicanze è stato del 5.3% (7/131); non c’è stata mortalità correlata alla procedura. Le procedure endoscopiche, in questo gruppo, sono risultate essere ad elevato grado di difficoltà nel 46.6% dei casi (grado 3 sec. la classificazione di Cotton). Il grado di difficoltà era inversamente correlato al tasso di successo (p<0.01), ma non correlato al tasso di complicanze. Il precut non è stato coronato da successo in 35 pazienti, che sono stati quindi sottoposti a: PTBD in 18 casi (51.4%), trattamento medico e follow-up radiologico in 11 casi (31.4%), trattamento chirurgico negli altri 6 (17.2%). Il PTBD ha registrato il 22.2% di complicanze (2 colangiti e 2 sanguinamenti con necessità di emotrasfusione). La EST standard è stata eseguita in 151 casi (corrispondenti al 20% di tutte le ERCP terapeutiche): il 56.3% erano femmine; l’età media era 63.5±17.6 anni. Il tasso di successo globale è stato del 92.7% (140/151), con una variabilità tra operatori che va dall’88.8% al 97.2%. Il tasso di complicanze è stato del 7.3% (11/151). Le procedure endoscopiche, in questo gruppo, sono risultate essere ad elevato grado di difficoltà nel 25% dei casi (grado 3 sec. la classificazione di Cotton). Se si considerano solamente le complicanze severe, si evidenzia una lieve prevalenza di casi nel gruppo dei precut (2.3%) rispetto al gruppo delle EST standard (1.3%) (p=ns). CONCLUSIONI: in una serie consecutiva di pazienti, con un’alta proporzione di casi difficili, il precut della papilla risulta essere una tecnica efficace e associata ad un accettabile tasso di complicanze.
BACKGROUND: Therapeutic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) involves selective cannulation of the common bile and/or pancreatic ducts. If the cannulation fails, there is the choice whether to use more invasive procedures (i.d. precut papillotomy) or stop the esamination and proceed with alternative methods (i.d. percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage - PTBD). OBJECTIVES: To compare the success and complication rates of precut papillotomy and of standard endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST). In cases of ERCP failure, to identify treatments used and its complications. METHODS: A prospective observational study was carried out on patients who underwent ERCP in a tertiary referral university hospital between January 2007 and April 2010. Two groups were studied: a) all the patients who underwent precut papillotomy; b) a subgroup of patients who underwent a standard EST (consecutively selecting a patient every four). The success and complication rates associated to the various methods were considered the main outcome measurements. RESULTS: A total of 783 ERCPs were performed, 755 with therapeutic intent. A precut papillotomy was carried out in 17.3% of total therapeutic ERCP (131/755; 51.1% females; mean age 65.5±13.7). The overall success rate was 73.3% (96/131) with an intra-operator variability between 63.1% and 83.3%. The complication rate was 5.3% (7/131); there were no cases of death. In this group 46.6% of cases were classified as presenting a high grade of difficulty (grade 3 of Cotton’s classification). The grade of difficulty was found to be inversely correlated with the success rate (p<0.01) but not with the complication rate. Papillotomy failed in 35 patients who then underwent: PTBD in 18 cases (51.4%), medical treatment and radiological follow-up in 11 (31.4%), and surgery in 6 (17.2%). PTBD was associated to a 22.2% rate of complications (2 cholangitis and 2 bleeding requiring blood transfusion). A standard EST was carried out in 151 cases (corresponding to 20% of the total therapeutic ERCPs): 56.3% female; mean age 63.5±17.6. The overall success rate was 92.7% (140/151) with an intra-operator variability between 88.8% and 97.2%. The complication rate was 7.3% (11/151). Twenty-five percent of standard EST were graded as presenting a high degree of difficulty (grade 3 of Cotton’s classification). If only severe complications are considered, there is only a slight prevalence in the precut group (2.3%) with respect to the standard EST group (1.3%) (p=ns). CONCLUSION: In a consecutive series of patients with a high proportion of difficult cases, papilla precutting is an useful technique with an acceptable complication rate.
Los estilos APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.

Capítulos de libros sobre el tema "Precut papillotomy"

1

Chandran, Sujievvan, Gary May y Paul Kortan. "Access (Precut) Papillotomy". En Ercp, 123–31. Elsevier, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-323-48109-0.00015-8.

Texto completo
Los estilos APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
2

Kortan, Paul y Gary May. "Access (Precut) Papillotomy". En ERCP, 116–23. Elsevier, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/b978-1-4557-2367-6.00014-7.

Texto completo
Los estilos APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
Ofrecemos descuentos en todos los planes premium para autores cuyas obras están incluidas en selecciones literarias temáticas. ¡Contáctenos para obtener un código promocional único!

Pasar a la bibliografía