Tesis sobre el tema "Polymorphisms"

The eosinophil cationic protein (ECP) is usually associated with the eosinophil granulocyte. In this thesis the presence and production of this protein has been studied in two other cells. The circulating monocyte was found to contain ECP mRNA and small amounts of ECP, one thousand times less than that found in the eosinophil. The production decreased by differentiation of the myelomonoblastic cell line U937 into a macrophage phenotype. Submucosal lung macrophages did not stain for ECP and alveolar macrophages did not contain ECP mRNA. The circulating neutrophil contains ECP at a level hundred fold less than the eosinophil. We found that the protein is located to the primary granules of the neutrophil but could detect no ECP mRNA in the cell. It was shown in vitro that the protein was taken up by the cell and partly transported to the primary granules. The uptake did not seem to be receptor mediated. Upon stimulation of the neutrophils, ECP previously taken up, was re-secreted.

The ECP protein is heterogeneous both to molecular characteristics and to function. To evaluate if a genetic component is involved, the ECP gene was analysed in 70 individuals. Three single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP´s) were found, denoted 277(C>T), 434(G>C) and 562(G>C). The two first were located to the mature peptide-coding region and would change the amino acids, arg45cys and arg97thr. The prevalence of the most common SNP, 434, was evaluated in two eosinophil-related diseases, allergy/asthma and Hodgkin Lymphoma (HL). Forty-three HL patients were evaluated and it was found that the 434GG was significantly more prevalent in patients having nodular sclerosis (NS) as compared to other histologies (p=0.03). Erythrocyte sedimentation rate was also related to the 434GG genotype (p=0.009). In 209 medical students 434GG was more common (p=0.002) in those who indicated allergy. The genotype was unrelated to the production of IgE antibodies to allergens. In analysis of 76 subjects with asthma it was found that the 434GG genotype was significantly more common among allergic asthmatics (p=0.04). Asthma and HL-NS are characterized by fibrosis and eosinophils and ECP has been suggested in fibrosis development.

Da die Kopplung des Analyten an der Chipoberfläche sowie die Hybridisierungs- und Dissoziationsparameter essentiell für die Methodenentwicklung war, wurden die Parameter für ein optimales Spotting und die Immobilisierung von PCR-Produkten ermittelt. Getestet wurden die affine Kopplung von biotinylierten PCR-Produkten an Streptavidin-, Avidin- und NeutrAvidin-Oberflächen sowie die kovalente Bindung von phosphorylierten Amplifikaten mit der EDC/Methylimidazol-Methode. Die besten Ergebnisse sowohl in Spotform und -homogenität als auch im Signal/Rausch-Verhältnis wurden an NeutrAvidin-Oberflächen erreicht.

Für die Etablierung der Mikroarray-Genotypisierungsmethode durch kinetische Analyse nach einem Hybridisierungsexperiment wurden Sondenlänge, Puffersystem, Spotting-Konzentration des Analyten sowie Temperatur optimiert. Das Analysensystem erlaubte es, PCR-Produkte mit einer Konzentration von 250 ng/µl in einem HEPES-EDTA-NaCl-Puffer auf mit NeutrAvidin beschichtete Glasträger zu spotten. In den anschließenden Hybridisierungs- und Dissoziationsexperimenten bei 30 °C konnte die Diskriminierung von homocygoter Wildtyp- und homocygoter Mutanten- sowie heterocygoter DNA am Beispiel von Oligonukleotid-Hybriden erreicht werden.

In einer Gruppe von 24 homocygoten Patienten wurde ein Polymorphismus im SULT1A1-Gen analysiert. Sowohl durch kinetische Auswertung als auch mit der Analyse der Fluoreszenzintensität wurde der Genotyp der Proben identifiziert. Die Ergebnisse wurden mit dem Referenzverfahren, der Restriktionschnittstellenanalyse (PCR-RFLP) validiert. Lediglich ein Genotyp wurde falsch bestimmt, die Genauigkeit lag bei 96%.

In einer Gruppe von 44 Patienten wurde der Genotyp eines SNP in der Adiponectin-Promotor-Region untersucht. Nach Vergleich der Analysenergebnisse mit denen eines Referenzverfahrens konnten lediglich 14 der untersuchten Genotypen bestätigt werden. Ursache für die unzureichende Genauigkeit der Methode war vor allem das schlechte Signal/Rausch-Verhältnis.

Zusammenfassend kann gesagt werden, dass das in dieser Arbeit entwickelte Analysesystem für die Genotypisierung von Einzelpunktmutationen geeignet ist, homocygote Patientenproben zuverlässig zu analysieren. Prinzipiell ist das auch bei heterocygoter DNA möglich. Da nach aktuellem Kenntnisstand eine SNP-Analysemethode an immobilisierten PCR-Produkten noch nicht veröffentlicht wurde, stellt das hier entwickelte Verfahren eine Alternative zu bisher bekannten Mikroarray-Verfahren dar. Als besonders vorteilhaft erweist sich der reverse Ansatz der Methode.

Der hier vorgestellte Ansatz ist eine kostengünstigere und weniger hoch dimensionierte Lösung für Fragestellungen beispielsweise in der Ernährungswissenschaft, bei denen meist eine mittlere Anzahl Patienten auf nur einige wenige SNPs zu untersuchen ist. Wenn es gelingt, durch die Weiterentwicklung der Hardware bzw. weiterer Optimierung, eine Verbesserung des Signal/Rausch-Verhältnisses und damit die Diskriminierung von heterocygoter DNA zu erreichen, kann diese Methode zukünftig bei der Analyse von mittelgroßen Patientengruppen alternativ zu anderen Genotypisierungsmethoden verwendet werden.
The aim of this thesis was the development of a SNP genotyping method involving PCR products immobilised on microarrays. For the analysis a fibre optic affinity biosensor and a flow-through biochip scanner were used. Fluorescent probes were hybridized with the immobilised PCR products. In order to start the dissociation process the surface was rinsed with buffer and the fluorescence intensity was measured.

Two different cases were studied: First, the full-matched DNA hybrid (wildtyp single strand with complementary wildtype single strand), second the mis-matched hybrid (wildtype single strand and mutant single strand). After determinating the reaction rates (kD) as kinetic parameter the kD values of both cases were compared. The experiments showed a significant difference in the kD value of the full- and the mis-match hybrids. Therefore, mutant and wildtype DNA were discriminated by kinetic analysis of the dissociation process and analysis of the fluorescence intensity.

To set up the complete analysis process the reaction parameters like coupling of the PCR products had to be optimised. Both affininty coupled (streptavidin, neutravidin, avidin - biotin) and covalent methods (EDC/methylimidazol) were carried out. Best results in spot homogeinity and spot appearance were obtained with coupling of biotinylated PCR products on neutravidin coated chip surfaces. Additionally, the length of the probe, the spotting concentration, the spotting buffer and the reaction temperature were optimised. In the optimised analysis PCR products (250 µg/µl) were spotted onto neutravidin coated surfaces. The hybridisation

and dissociation processes were carried out at 30°C. A HEPES-EDTA-NaCl buffer was used for spotting, diluting of the fluorescent probe and rinsing the microarray surface. A fluorescent probe was used with 13 nucleotides in length. The mis- or full-matching base indicating the polymorphism was located in the center position of the probe.

The analysis system was tested with the genomic DNA of a group of 24 homocygote individuals with a SNP in the SULT1A1 gene region. The hybridisation and dissociation processes were carried out and the reaction rates were determinated. Subsequently after the analysis in the flow-through biochip scanner the fluorescence intensity of the

spots were measured. The results showed very good comparability with results of a PCR-RFLP analysis (one false genotype). Additionally, a group of 44 heterocygote DNA samples with one SNP in the adiponectin promotor region were also genotyped. Compared to a reference method only 14 genotypes were correctly determined. This was mostly due to a low signal-noise-ratio and needs to be further investigated.

Besides the problem in analysing heterocygote DNA samples the developed analysis system is very useful for genotyping SNP in homocygote DNA samples. The successful analysis of heterocygote sample is principally possible and with further investigations/optimisation, a better analysis should be possible.

The most important advantage of the developed method is the reverse approach of binding PCR products at the surface instead of oligonucleotides. This allows the parallel genotyping of several individuals. Other advantages include low costs and medium sized dimensions in terms of throughput.