Artículos de revistas sobre el tema "Peer review of research grant proposals"
Crea una cita precisa en los estilos APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard y otros
Consulte los 50 mejores artículos de revistas para su investigación sobre el tema "Peer review of research grant proposals".
Junto a cada fuente en la lista de referencias hay un botón "Agregar a la bibliografía". Pulsa este botón, y generaremos automáticamente la referencia bibliográfica para la obra elegida en el estilo de cita que necesites: APA, MLA, Harvard, Vancouver, Chicago, etc.
También puede descargar el texto completo de la publicación académica en formato pdf y leer en línea su resumen siempre que esté disponible en los metadatos.
Explore artículos de revistas sobre una amplia variedad de disciplinas y organice su bibliografía correctamente.
Lindquist, RD, MF Tracy y D. Treat-Jacobson. "Peer review of nursing research proposals". American Journal of Critical Care 4, n.º 1 (1 de enero de 1995): 59–65. http://dx.doi.org/10.4037/ajcc1995.4.1.59.
Texto completoMarchant, Mary A. "The Keys to Preparing Successful Research Grant Proposals". Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 33, n.º 3 (diciembre de 2001): 605–12. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s1074070800021040.
Texto completoConix, Stijn, Andreas De Block y Krist Vaesen. "Grant writing and grant peer review as questionable research practices". F1000Research 10 (8 de noviembre de 2021): 1126. http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.73893.1.
Texto completoConix, Stijn, Andreas De Block y Krist Vaesen. "Grant writing and grant peer review as questionable research practices". F1000Research 10 (24 de diciembre de 2021): 1126. http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.73893.2.
Texto completoMutz, Rüdiger, Lutz Bornmann y Hans-Dieter Daniel. "Does Gender Matter in Grant Peer Review?" Zeitschrift für Psychologie 220, n.º 2 (enero de 2012): 121–29. http://dx.doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000103.
Texto completoBotham, Crystal M., Shay Brawn, Latishya Steele, Cisco B. Barrón, Sofie R. Kleppner y Daniel Herschlag. "Biosciences Proposal Bootcamp: Structured peer and faculty feedback improves trainees’ proposals and grantsmanship self-efficacy". PLOS ONE 15, n.º 12 (28 de diciembre de 2020): e0243973. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0243973.
Texto completoGallo, Stephen A. y Karen B. Schmaling. "Peer review: Risk and risk tolerance". PLOS ONE 17, n.º 8 (26 de agosto de 2022): e0273813. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0273813.
Texto completoFrampton, Geoff, Jonathan Shepherd, Karen Pickett y Jeremy Wyatt. "PP021 Peer Review Innovations For Grant Applications: Efficient And Effective?" International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care 33, S1 (2017): 78–79. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0266462317002124.
Texto completoGuthrie, Susan, Daniela Rodriguez Rincon, Gordon McInroy, Becky Ioppolo y Salil Gunashekar. "Measuring bias, burden and conservatism in research funding processes". F1000Research 8 (12 de junio de 2019): 851. http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.19156.1.
Texto completoFogelholm, Mikael, Saara Leppinen, Anssi Auvinen, Jani Raitanen, Anu Nuutinen y Kalervo Väänänen. "Panel discussion does not improve reliability of peer review for medical research grant proposals". Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 65, n.º 1 (enero de 2012): 47–52. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.05.001.
Texto completoRoumbanis, Lambros. "The oracles of science: On grant peer review and competitive funding". Social Science Information 60, n.º 3 (5 de julio de 2021): 356–62. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/05390184211019241.
Texto completoCerroni, Andrea. "Socio-cognitive perverse effects in peer review. Reflections and proposals". Journal of Science Communication 02, n.º 03 (21 de septiembre de 2003): F05. http://dx.doi.org/10.22323/2.02030905.
Texto completoDüzgüneş, Nejat. "‘Science by consensus’ impedes scientific creativity and progress: An alternative to funding biomedical research". F1000Research 11 (19 de agosto de 2022): 961. http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.124082.1.
Texto completoDumanis, Sonya B., Lauren Ullrich, Patricia M. Washington y Patrick A. Forcelli. "It's Money! Real-World Grant Experience through a Student-Run, Peer-Reviewed Program". CBE—Life Sciences Education 12, n.º 3 (septiembre de 2013): 419–28. http://dx.doi.org/10.1187/cbe.12-05-0058.
Texto completoSeverin, Anna, Joao Martins, Rachel Heyard, François Delavy, Anne Jorstad y Matthias Egger. "Gender and other potential biases in peer review: cross-sectional analysis of 38 250 external peer review reports". BMJ Open 10, n.º 8 (agosto de 2020): e035058. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035058.
Texto completoCicchetti, Domenic V. "The reliability of peer review for manuscript and grant submissions: A cross-disciplinary investigation". Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14, n.º 1 (marzo de 1991): 119–35. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0140525x00065675.
Texto completoF. Recher, Harry. "Editorial Policy on Referees". Pacific Conservation Biology 5, n.º 3 (1999): 162. http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/pc990162.
Texto completoNguyen, Quang Nhat. "Revisiting Peer Classroom Observations as A Teacher Professional Development Protocol: A Critical Theoretical Review of Global Practices". Vietnam Journal of Education 5, n.º 2 (29 de junio de 2021): 10–20. http://dx.doi.org/10.52296/vje.2021.71.
Texto completoMcDaniel, Andrew, Douglas R. Fullen, Kathleen R. Cho, David R. Lucas, Thomas J. Giordano, Joel Greenson, Andrew P. Lieberman, Lakshmi P. Kunju, Jeffrey L. Myers y Michael H. Roh. "Funding Anatomic Pathology Research: A Retrospective Analysis of an Intramural Funding Mechanism". Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine 137, n.º 9 (1 de septiembre de 2013): 1270–73. http://dx.doi.org/10.5858/arpa.2012-0546-oa.
Texto completoPoole, Millicent E. "Reviewing for Research Excellence: Expectations, Procedures and Outcomes". Australian Journal of Education 37, n.º 3 (noviembre de 1993): 219–30. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/000494419303700301.
Texto completoTorres-Cintrón, Mariela, Margarita Irizarry-Ramírez y Harold Saavedra. "98729 Professional Development Core of the Hispanic Alliance for Clinical and Translational Research: a scientific productivity catalyst for underrepresented minorities (URM) in Clinical and Translational Research (CTR)". Journal of Clinical and Translational Science 5, s1 (marzo de 2021): 65. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2021.570.
Texto completoBloch, Sidney y Garry Walter. "The Impact Factor: Time for Change". Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry 35, n.º 5 (octubre de 2001): 563–68. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0004867010060502.
Texto completoHaryadi, Haryadi, Citra Amalia, Doddy Teguh Yuwono, Fitri Amalia Sholehah y Santika Santika. "SISTEM PENDUKUNG KEPUTUSAN SELEKSI BANTUAN DANA HIBAH PENELITIAN DENGAN METODE ANALYTIC NETWORK PROCE (ANP)". Jurnal Informatika dan Rekayasa Elektronik 4, n.º 1 (19 de abril de 2021): 1–11. http://dx.doi.org/10.36595/jire.v4i1.293.
Texto completoWarren, Andrea, Shilpa Constantinides, Edward Frongillo y Christine Blake. "Stakeholder Engagement Strategies for Policy and Programmatic Uptake: Lessons from the Drivers of Food Choice Competitive Grants Program". Current Developments in Nutrition 4, Supplement_2 (29 de mayo de 2020): 920. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cdn/nzaa053_125.
Texto completoBayindir, Esra Eren, Mehmet Yigit Gurdal y Ismail Saglam. "A Game Theoretic Approach to Peer Review of Grant Proposals". Journal of Informetrics 13, n.º 4 (noviembre de 2019): 100981. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2019.100981.
Texto completoPorter, Alan L. y Frederick A. Rossini. "Peer Review of Interdisciplinary Research Proposals". Science, Technology, & Human Values 10, n.º 3 (julio de 1985): 33–38. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/016224398501000304.
Texto completoAzizi, Kiran, Shahan Waheed, Rubina Barolia, Naveed Ahmed y Madiha Ismail. "Understanding perceptions and factors involved in do not resuscitate (DNR) decision making in the emergency department of a low-resource country: a mixed-methods study protocol". BMJ Open 10, n.º 9 (septiembre de 2020): e038915. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038915.
Texto completoHodgson, Corinne. "How reliable is peer review? An examination of operating grant proposals simultaneously submitted to two similar peer review systems". Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 50, n.º 11 (noviembre de 1997): 1189–95. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0895-4356(97)00167-4.
Texto completoGupta, Vishnu Kumar. "Quality Control through Peer Review Process in Scholarly Communication: Review of Related Literature". IRA-International Journal of Management & Social Sciences (ISSN 2455-2267) 8, n.º 3 (7 de octubre de 2017): 248. http://dx.doi.org/10.21013/jmss.v8.n3.p3.
Texto completoKotchen, Theodore A. "NIH Peer Review of Grant Applications for Clinical Research". JAMA 291, n.º 7 (18 de febrero de 2004): 836. http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jama.291.7.836.
Texto completoLuo, Junwen, Thomas Feliciani, Martin Reinhart, Judith Hartstein, Vineeth Das, Olalere Alabi y Kalpana Shankar. "Analyzing sentiments in peer review reports: Evidence from two science funding agencies". Quantitative Science Studies 2, n.º 4 (2021): 1271–95. http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00156.
Texto completoGiraudeau, Bruno, Clémence Leyrat, Amélie Le Gouge, Julie Léger y Agnès Caille. "Peer Review of Grant Applications: A Simple Method to Identify Proposals with Discordant Reviews". PLoS ONE 6, n.º 11 (14 de noviembre de 2011): e27557. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0027557.
Texto completoScherngell, T., I. Roche, M. Horlesberger, D. Besagni, M. E. Zuger y D. Holste. "Initial comparative analysis of model and peer review process for ERC starting grant proposals". Research Evaluation 22, n.º 4 (8 de agosto de 2013): 248–57. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvt015.
Texto completovan Gunsteren, Wilfred. "On the pitfalls of peer review". F1000Research 4 (11 de noviembre de 2015): 1244. http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.7342.1.
Texto completoVodyanitskaya, E. "Peer Review Regulation in the German Science and Research Association". MGIMO Review of International Relations, n.º 5(26) (28 de octubre de 2012): 227–34. http://dx.doi.org/10.24833/2071-8160-2012-5-26-227-234.
Texto completoHall, Meldra, Jeffrey Engler, Japera Hemming, Ernest Alema-Mensah, Adriana Baez, Kimberly Lawson, Alexander Quarshie et al. "Using a Virtual Community (the Health Equity Learning Collaboratory) to Support Early-Stage Investigators Pursuing Grant Funding". International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 15, n.º 11 (30 de octubre de 2018): 2408. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15112408.
Texto completoColletti, Lisa M., Joseph C. Kolars y James O. Woolliscroft. "GME Innovations Grant Program at the University of Michigan Health System—Fostering Changes in Education and Clinical Care". Journal of Graduate Medical Education 5, n.º 4 (1 de diciembre de 2013): 665–67. http://dx.doi.org/10.4300/jgme-d-12-00317.1.
Texto completoLangille, Lynn L. y Theresa Mackenzie. "Navigating the Road to Success: Guidelines for Preparing Competitive Grant Proposals". Evidence Based Library and Information Practice 2, n.º 1 (14 de marzo de 2007): 23. http://dx.doi.org/10.18438/b8kk5s.
Texto completoGraves, N., A. G. Barnett y P. Clarke. "Funding grant proposals for scientific research: retrospective analysis of scores by members of grant review panel". BMJ 343, sep27 1 (27 de septiembre de 2011): d4797. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d4797.
Texto completoTamblyn, Robyn, Nadyne Girard, Christina J. Qian y James Hanley. "Assessment of potential bias in research grant peer review in Canada". Canadian Medical Association Journal 190, n.º 16 (22 de abril de 2018): E489—E499. http://dx.doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.170901.
Texto completoPier, Elizabeth L., Markus Brauer, Amarette Filut, Anna Kaatz, Joshua Raclaw, Mitchell J. Nathan, Cecilia E. Ford y Molly Carnes. "Low agreement among reviewers evaluating the same NIH grant applications". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 115, n.º 12 (5 de marzo de 2018): 2952–57. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1714379115.
Texto completoBergenholtz, Henning y Rufus Gouws. "Proposals for the Writing of Peer Reviews in Lexicography". HERMES - Journal of Language and Communication in Business 27, n.º 54 (22 de diciembre de 2015): 107. http://dx.doi.org/10.7146/hjlcb.v27i54.22950.
Texto completoJayasinghe, Upali W., Herbert W. Marsh y Nigel Bond. "Peer Review in the Funding of Research in Higher Education: The Australian Experience". Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 23, n.º 4 (diciembre de 2001): 343–64. http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/01623737023004343.
Texto completoGallo, Stephen A., Joanne H. Sullivan y DaJoie R. Croslan. "Scientists from Minority-Serving Institutions and Their Participation in Grant Peer Review". BioScience 72, n.º 3 (5 de enero de 2022): 289–99. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biab130.
Texto completoGuthrie, Susan, Ioana Ghiga y Steven Wooding. "What do we know about grant peer review in the health sciences?" F1000Research 6 (7 de agosto de 2017): 1335. http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.11917.1.
Texto completoGuthrie, Susan, Ioana Ghiga y Steven Wooding. "What do we know about grant peer review in the health sciences?" F1000Research 6 (27 de marzo de 2018): 1335. http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.11917.2.
Texto completoHuutoniemi, Katri. "Communicating and compromising on disciplinary expertise in the peer review of research proposals". Social Studies of Science 42, n.º 6 (17 de octubre de 2012): 897–921. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0306312712458478.
Texto completoBaimpos, Theodoros, Nils Dittel y Roumen Borissov. "Unravelling the panel contribution upon peer review evaluation of numerous, unstructured and highly interdisciplinary research proposals". Research Evaluation 29, n.º 3 (1 de julio de 2020): 316–26. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvz013.
Texto completoOrtenberg, Elia, Karen Roberto, Dana Plude, Janetta Lun y Helena Gabor. "DEMYSTIFYING NIH PEER REVIEW: YOUR APPLICATION FROM SUBMISSION TO SCORE". Innovation in Aging 6, Supplement_1 (1 de noviembre de 2022): 30. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igac059.111.
Texto completoTurner, Sheila, Judith Lathlean, Fay Chinnery, Rebecca Moran, Eleanor Guegan y Jeremy Wyatt. "PP068 Stakeholder Views On Peer Review Of National Institute for Health Research Grant Applications". International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care 33, S1 (2017): 102. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0266462317002434.
Texto completo