Bibliografías temáticas / Peer review of research grant proposals / Libros

Libros sobre el tema "Peer review of research grant proposals"

Siga este enlace para ver otros tipos de publicaciones sobre el tema: Peer review of research grant proposals.
Autor: Grafiati
Publicado: 4 de junio de 2021
Última modificación: 3 de marzo de 2023

Crea una cita precisa en los estilos APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard y otros

Elija tipo de fuente:

Consulte los 31 mejores mejores libros para su investigación sobre el tema "Peer review of research grant proposals".

Junto a cada fuente en la lista de referencias hay un botón "Agregar a la bibliografía". Pulsa este botón, y generaremos automáticamente la referencia bibliográfica para la obra elegida en el estilo de cita que necesites: APA, MLA, Harvard, Vancouver, Chicago, etc.

También puede descargar el texto completo de la publicación académica en formato pdf y leer en línea su resumen siempre que esté disponible en los metadatos.

Explore libros sobre una amplia variedad de disciplinas y organice su bibliografía correctamente.

1

National Cancer Institute (U.S.), ed. Share your expertise with us. [Bethesda Md.]: National Cancer Insitute, 2001.

Buscar texto completo
Los estilos APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
2

Langfeldt, Liv. Fagfellevurdering som forskningspolitisk virkemiddel: En studie av fordelingen av frie midler i Norges forskningsråd. Oslo: NIFU, Norsk institutt for studier av forskning og utdanning, 1998.

Buscar texto completo
Los estilos APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
3

Hill, Anne. Addressing common problems: Guidance for submitting European Commission fifth framework proposals. Birmingham: Outreach Press, 2001.

Buscar texto completo
Los estilos APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
4

Richard, Mandel. A half century of peer review, 1946-1996. Bethesda, MD (2760 Eisenhower Ave., Alexandria 22314): Division of Research Grants, National Institutes of Health, 1996.

Buscar texto completo
Los estilos APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
5

Center, Horace Mann Learning, ed. Reviewing applications for discretionary grants and cooperative agreements: A workbook for application reviewers. [Washington, D.C.?]: Horace Mann Learning Center, 1988.

Buscar texto completo
Los estilos APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
6

Center, Horace Mann Learning. Reviewing applications for discretionary grants and cooperative agreements: A workbook for application reviewers. Washington, D.C.?]: Horace Mann Learning Center, U.S. Department of Education, 1991.

Buscar texto completo
Los estilos APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
7

S, Frankel Mark y Cave Jane, eds. Evaluating science and scientists: An east-west dialogue on research evaluation in post-communist Europe. Budapest: Central European University Press, 1997.

Buscar texto completo
Los estilos APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
8

Learning Anytime Anywhere Partnerships: Information & application materials : deadline for submissions: April 2, 1999. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Fund for the Improvement of Postsecondary Education, 1999.

Buscar texto completo
Los estilos APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
9

Shestopal, A. V. y V. I. Konnov. Sot︠s︡ialʹno-politicheskai︠a︡ funkt︠s︡ii︠a︡ nat︠s︡ionalʹnykh nauchnykh fondov: Sbornik nauchnykh stateĭ. Moskva: Izdatelʹstvo "MGIMO-Universitet", 2016.

Buscar texto completo
Los estilos APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
10

1956-, Evans Martyn, ed. A decent proposal: Ethical review of clinical research. New York, N.Y: Wiley, 1996.

Buscar texto completo
Los estilos APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
11

D, Muraskin Lana, United States. National Educational Research Policy and Priorities Board y Educational Resources Information Center (U.S.), eds. Strengthening the standards: Recommendations for OERI peer review : summary report, draft January 30, 1999. [Washington, DC]: U.S. Dept. of Education, National Educational Research Policy and Priorities Board, 1999.

Buscar texto completo
Los estilos APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
12

The merit review process: Ensuring limited federal resources are invested in the best science : hearing before the Subcommittee on Research and Science Education, Committee on Science, Space, and Technology, House of Representatives, One Hundred Twelfth Congress, first session, Tuesday, July 26, 2011. Washington: U.S. G.P.O., 2011.

Buscar texto completo
Los estilos APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
13

Dogmatism in science and medicine: How dominant theories monopolize research and stifle the search for truth. Jefferson, N.C: McFarland & Co., 2012.

Buscar texto completo
Los estilos APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
14

D, Muraskin Lana, August and Associates y United States. National Educational Research Policy and Priorities Board, eds. Strengthening the standards: Recommendations for OERI Peer Review : summary report prepared for the National Educational Research Policy and Priorities Board. Washington, DC (80 F St., NW, Washington 20208-7564): The Board, 1999.

Buscar texto completo
Los estilos APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
15

Badji, Toure Lalla y African Development Foundation, eds. Mobilizing the grassroots for community health: An ADF research reader. Washington, D.C. (1400 Eye St., N.W., 10th floor, Washington 20005): African Development Foundation, 1995.

Buscar texto completo
Los estilos APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
16

Badji, Toure Lalla y African Development Foundation (U.S.), eds. Mobilizing the grassroots for community health: An ADF research reader. Washington, D.C. (1400 Eye St., N.W., 10th floor, Washington 20005): African Development Foundation, 1995.

Buscar texto completo
Los estilos APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
17

National Research Council (U.S.). Committee on the Department of Energy-Office of Science and Technology's Peer Review Program., ed. Peer review in the Department of Energy, Office of Science and Technology: Interim report. Washington, D.C: National Academy Press, 1997.

Buscar texto completo
Los estilos APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
18

National Institutes of Health (U.S.), ed. NIH peer review of research grant applications. [Bethesda, Md.]: Dept. of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, National Institutes of Health, 1988.

Buscar texto completo
Los estilos APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
19

National Institutes of Health (U.S.), ed. NIH peer review of research grant applications. [Bethesda, Md.]: Dept. of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, National Institites of Health, 1987.

Buscar texto completo
Los estilos APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
20

Office, General Accounting. Department of Education grant award. Washington, D.C: The Office, 1992.

Buscar texto completo
Los estilos APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
21

Office, General Accounting. Department of Education grant award. Washington, D.C: The Office, 1992.

Buscar texto completo
Los estilos APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
22

Share your expertise with us. [Bethesda, Md.]: National Cancer Institute, 2002.

Buscar texto completo
Los estilos APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
23

Jefferson, Tim. Peer Review in Health Sciences. Bmj Publishing Group, 1999.

Buscar texto completo
Los estilos APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
24

(Editor), Mark S. Frankel y Jane Cave (Editor), eds. Evaluating Science and Scientists: An East-West Dialogue on Research Evaluation in Post-Communist Europe. A Central European University Press Book, 1997.

Buscar texto completo
Los estilos APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
25

Final report. Washington, D.C: National Science Foundation, 1986.

Buscar texto completo
Los estilos APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
26

(US), National Research Council y Committee on the Department of Energy-Office of Science and Technology's Peer Review Program. Peer Review in the Department of Energy-Office of Science and Technology: Interim Report. National Academies Press, 1997.

Buscar texto completo
Los estilos APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
27

Peach, Ken. Reviewing Research, Making Proposals and Evaluating Science. Oxford University Press, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198796077.003.0011.

Texto completo
Resumen
This chapter focuses on the review process, the process of writing a proposal and the evaluation of science. The usual way that science is funded these days is through a proposal to a funding agency; if it satisfies peer review and there are sufficient resources available, it is then funded. Peer review is at the heart of academic life, and is used to assess research proposals, progress, publications and institutions. Peer review processes are discussed and, in light of this discussion, the art of proposal writing. The particular features of making fellowship proposals and preparing for an institutional review are described. In addition, several of the methods used for evaluating and ranking research and research institutions are reviewed, including the Research Assessment Exercise and the Research Excellence Framework.
Los estilos APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
28

Spyns, Peter y Maria-Esther Vidal. Научное рецензирование. Лучшие практики и рекомендации. Editado por Elena Tikhonova y Olga Kirillova. Eco-Vector, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.17816/spr202101.

Texto completo
Resumen
This booklet aims to tackle this problem by providing a practical introduction to the practice of peer reviewing. Although it mainly focuses on paper reviewing for scientific events in the domain of computer science and (business) informatics, many of the principles, tips, tricks, and examples are generalizable to journal reviewing and other scientific domains. Some of the principles and tips can also be applied when reviewing proposals for research projects or grants. In addition, many aspects of this booklet will also benefit authors of scientific papers (even outside computer science) as they will gain more insight into how papers are reviewed and hence where they have to pay attention to when writing their papers.
Los estilos APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
29

Cho, Jeasik. Evaluating Qualitative Research. Oxford University Press, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199330010.001.0001.

Texto completo
Resumen
This book provides the qualitative research community with some insight on how to evaluate the quality of qualitative research. This topic has gained little attention during the past few decades. We, qualitative researchers, read journal articles, serve on masters’ and doctoral committees, and also make decisions on whether conference proposals, manuscripts, or large-scale grant proposals should be accepted or rejected. It is assumed that various perspectives or criteria, depending on various paradigms, theories, or fields of discipline, have been used in assessing the quality of qualitative research. Nonetheless, until now, no textbook has been specifically devoted to exploring theories, practices, and reflections associated with the evaluation of qualitative research. This book constructs a typology of evaluating qualitative research, examines actual information from websites and qualitative journal editors, and reflects on some challenges that are currently encountered by the qualitative research community. Many different kinds of journals’ review guidelines and available assessment tools are collected and analyzed. Consequently, core criteria that stand out among these evaluation tools are presented. Readers are invited to join the author to confidently proclaim: “Fortunately, there are commonly agreed, bold standards for evaluating the goodness of qualitative research in the academic research community. These standards are a part of what is generally called ‘scientific research.’ ”
Los estilos APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
30

Boyer-Kassem, Thomas, Conor Mayo-Wilson y Michael Weisberg, eds. Scientific Collaboration and Collective Knowledge. Oxford University Press, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190680534.001.0001.

Texto completo
Resumen
Descartes once argued that, with sufficient effort and skill, a single scientist could uncover fundamental truths about our world. Contemporary science proves the limits of this claim. From synthesizing the human genome to predicting the effects of climate change, some current scientific research requires the collaboration of hundreds (if not thousands) of scientists with various specializations. Additionally, the majority of published scientific research is now coauthored, including more than 80% of articles in the natural sciences. Small collaborative teams have become the norm in science. This is the first volume to address critical philosophical questions about how collective scientific research could be organized differently and how it should be organized. For example, should scientists be required to share knowledge with competing research teams? How can universities and grant-giving institutions promote successful collaborations? When hundreds of researchers contribute to a discovery, how should credit be assigned—and can minorities expect a fair share? When collaborative work contains significant errors or fraudulent data, who deserves blame? In this collection of essays, leading philosophers of science address these critical questions, among others. Their work extends current philosophical research on the social structure of science and contributes to the growing, interdisciplinary field of social epistemology. The volume’s strength lies in the diversity of its authors’ methodologies. Employing detailed case studies of scientific practice, mathematical models of scientific communities, and rigorous conceptual analysis, contributors to this volume study scientific groups of all kinds, including small labs, peer-review boards, and large international collaborations like those in climate science and particle physics.
Los estilos APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
31

Martinho Belchior, Alirio, Carlos Mascarenhas, Maha Othman, Marília Rua, Mari Takashima, Marta Silva, Laila Albalushi et al. iNURSING JOURNAL - Manual for Authors: The step-by-step instructions guide. International Nursing School Ltd., 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.52457/qprz4666.

Texto completo
Resumen
The iNursing Journal (iNJ) is the official journal of the International Nursing School (INS) and intends to disseminate the evidence-based nursing and health care, contributing to the advancement of relevant knowledge in the fields of clinic, management, education, research, advice, as well as to support decisions in public policies. The iNJ is an international journal that intends to receive proposals for publication from over the world, defending cultural diversity, as well as a diversity of contexts and of theoretical-methodological approaches that inform professionals, users, and political stakeholders for their decision-making. The articles published in iNJ must make clear their international knowledge translation and show a critical-reflective, scientific, theoretical and culturally sensitive approach. Although iNJ is mainly dedicated to research in nursing and health sciences, there are no restrictions on articles’ authorship, if they fit the requirements and format of the iNJ. In fact, the iNJ addresses and welcomes articles in health sciences and nursing. The journal publishes randomized trials, observational studies, qualitative research, systematic reviews, scoping reviews, among others. All articles submitted will be subject to double-blind peer review. The iNJ has an Editorial Team headed by the Editor-in-Chief that additionally has the assistance of the Deputy Editor-in-Chief, Editorial Team Members, and Reviewers. The Editorial Team in addition, is supported by an Office Administrator. Members of the Editorial Team meet regularly to evaluate the iNJ progress and to discuss overall goals. The frequency of the Editorial Team meetings varies and depends on the specific needs of the journal. In the following sections, we start to explain the Article Submission Guidelines, including the rules, bibliographic reference standards and article submission process. Followed by the Article Preparation section, that incorporates the different documents that must be submitted, including the Author consent and terms agreement that must be duly read, fulfilled and signed, and also give examples of checklists that can be used to prepare your article for submission. Finally, we present the iNJ Ethics Statement, Duties and Policies.
Los estilos APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
También puede estar interesado en las bibliografías sobre el tema "Peer review of research grant proposals" para otros tipos de fuentes:
Artículos de revistas
Ofrecemos descuentos en todos los planes premium para autores cuyas obras están incluidas en selecciones literarias temáticas. ¡Contáctenos para obtener un código promocional único!

Pasar a la bibliografía