Literatura académica sobre el tema "Non pecuniary losse"
Crea una cita precisa en los estilos APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard y otros
Consulte las listas temáticas de artículos, libros, tesis, actas de conferencias y otras fuentes académicas sobre el tema "Non pecuniary losse".
Junto a cada fuente en la lista de referencias hay un botón "Agregar a la bibliografía". Pulsa este botón, y generaremos automáticamente la referencia bibliográfica para la obra elegida en el estilo de cita que necesites: APA, MLA, Harvard, Vancouver, Chicago, etc.
También puede descargar el texto completo de la publicación académica en formato pdf y leer en línea su resumen siempre que esté disponible en los metadatos.
Artículos de revistas sobre el tema "Non pecuniary losse"
May, Joanna. "Pursuit of Non-Pecuniary Loss and Pecuniary Damage Compensation for Spoiled Holiday". Review of European and Comparative Law 40, n.º 1 (11 de agosto de 2020): 163–87. http://dx.doi.org/10.31743/recl.5737.
Texto completoAndoh, Benjamin. "Damages for Non-pecuniary Loss Re-visited". Business Law Review 33, Issue 7 (1 de julio de 2012): 181–84. http://dx.doi.org/10.54648/bula2012043.
Texto completoKasperska, Martyna. "Personality Rights – A Universal Tool for the Recovery of Non-Pecuniary Loss". ATHENS JOURNAL OF LAW 7, n.º 4 (30 de septiembre de 2021): 575–86. http://dx.doi.org/10.30958/ajl.7-4-8.
Texto completoKryla-Cudna, Katarzyna. "Breach of Contract and Damages for Non-Pecuniary Loss". European Review of Private Law 26, Issue 4 (1 de septiembre de 2018): 515–35. http://dx.doi.org/10.54648/erpl2018035.
Texto completoBagińska, Ewa. "Wrongful Birth and Non-Pecuniary Loss: Theories of Compensation". Journal of European Tort Law 1, n.º 2 (agosto de 2010): 171–203. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/jetl.2010.171.
Texto completoKnetsch, Jonas. "The Compensation of Non-Pecuniary Loss in GDPR Infringement Cases". Journal of European Tort Law 13, n.º 2 (4 de agosto de 2022): 132–53. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/jetl-2022-0008.
Texto completoKweon, Tae-Sang. "Damages for Non-pecuniary Loss due to Personality Rights Infringement". Justice 178 (30 de junio de 2020): 182–211. http://dx.doi.org/10.29305/tj.2020.06.178.182.
Texto completoZlatev, Zlatin. "Quantification of damages for non-pecuniary losses deriving from breach of contract". Legal Studies 40, n.º 4 (7 de julio de 2020): 548–64. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/lst.2020.28.
Texto completo정남순 y 고수윤. "A study on Damages for Non-pecuniary Loss in Environmental Litigation". Environmental Law and Policy 13, n.º ll (septiembre de 2014): 95–123. http://dx.doi.org/10.18215/envlp.13..201409.95.
Texto completoHalson, R. "Claims for Non-Pecuniary Loss in Employment Tribunals Following Johnson v Unisys". Industrial Law Journal 32, n.º 3 (1 de septiembre de 2003): 214–17. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ilj/32.3.214.
Texto completoTesis sobre el tema "Non pecuniary losse"
Bell, Andrew James. "Damages for non-pecuniary loss in the tort of negligence : a reconceptualisation". Thesis, University of Birmingham, 2018. http://etheses.bham.ac.uk//id/eprint/8460/.
Texto completoKontrimas, Albertas. "Draudimo išmoka dėl neturtinės žalos: teorinės ir praktinės problemos". Master's thesis, Lithuanian Academic Libraries Network (LABT), 2011. http://vddb.laba.lt/obj/LT-eLABa-0001:E.02~2009~D_20110709_152335-93257.
Texto completoLong ago people recognized non-pecuniary damage, as wel as pecuniary losses, which are stemming from physical injuries, death or emotional trauma. All these kinds of damages are hard to estimate and determine though. Despite the fact that some lawyers argue for abolition of compansation for non-pecuniary damage, this sort of damage still seem to be significant dealing with defence of a plaintiff under this rubric in defferent European countries. By the means of legal practice of non-pecuniary nature the person could claim damages for physical and emotional suffering, nervousness, grief, anxiety and ambarrasment. However, non-pecuniary damage should not be identified with pecuniary losses. At this point, the apprehension of non-pecuniary damage is supposed to be linked to the compensation instead of fine. In order to clarify this statement, the most important is that the compensation of non-pecuniary damage, first of all, serves as damage rewarding or as a kind of civil remedy and protection. Although, some voises said that pain and suffering awardas are hard to estimate due to the fact that the damage valuation of these kinds of losses sometimes we just can not figure out properly. Nowadays, under legal regulation, courts determine and estimate the value on non-pecuniary damage bearing in mind all significant circumstanses. Consequently, courts could change the value on non-pecuniary damage in two ways: lower or higher the compensation for these losses. Moreover, courts... [to full text]
Dupont, Alain. "Non-Pecuniary loss in commercial contracts: with special emphasis on the United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods (CISG)". Master's thesis, University of Cape Town, 2014. http://hdl.handle.net/11427/4601.
Texto completoWilhelm, Markus [Verfasser] y Wolfgang [Akademischer Betreuer] Maennig. "Selected Issues Concerning Life Satisfaction : Measuring Non-Pecuniary Gains and Losses with Panel Data of the Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP) / Markus Wilhelm. Betreuer: Wolfgang Maennig". Hamburg : Staats- und Universitätsbibliothek Hamburg, 2015. http://d-nb.info/1071370197/34.
Texto completoWu, Yi-Jung y 吳依蓉. "Compensation for Non-pecuniary Loss inMedical Liability". Thesis, 2014. http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/47695117782195755339.
Texto completo國立臺灣大學
法律學研究所
103
The damages discussed start from compensation for non-pecuniary loss in medical liability. In the medical incident, the deliberate practice apply on considering factors and the amount of gold given how the amount of the specific application. Besides, there is any difference between on the amount of gold given in medical events and in traffic incident or not. In research methods, considering factors and the amount of gold given were discussed in this thesis. At beginning, discuss practices in specific cases about what considering factors to determine the final amount of the judgment and make recommendations on this some scholars about the considering factors. Secondly, Discuss reasons for the amount of medical events consolation given is significantly lower, and we have to think whether the results towards the objective, tabular in order to save judicial proceedings resources, giving the parties in assessing whether to seek the basis litigation. One factor is deliberate false. Second is the amount of fixed amount is significantly lower. Although these two issues were discussed separately, but there were also closely. In short, in order to find out the root causes, we still return to considering factors problems. The thesis put forward questions that medical practice has always been deliberate event consolation payments "personal status, economic status and degree of injury both sides" whether all considering factors and the amount of gold are related or not. Besides, judges and the parties need so spend much time and cost to debate. In addition, to further deliberate on the practice of medical events for cases of "special physical victim, the contributory negligence, the offender’s negligence and medical characteristics of the ", whether are all in cases considered? Why do we need to consider factors such reasons deliberate? Whether these factors and consolation given the amount of gold is closely related? Why such deliberate references to specific factors specific cases, but not cited in other cases? The paper believes that there are two main problems in the medical event gold operation consolation in the current practice. Therefore, judges should simplify as "the parties in family status, age and degree of injury victims," other factors are considered in accordance into consideration case by case, but whether and how deliberate judgment should be attached detailed reasons. The main reasons are as follows. Firstly, from among "the plural right person," observed the complex economic situation, education, occupational status is different. However, people get the same amount of gold in the medical judgment. Access to detailed information on the parties in the court of the form, and as a basis for judgment, in essence, the verdict seems to be no impact on the amount of consolation in the different position of the parties in status. Besides, from the "different types of events," observed the medical events obligor''s financial position is strong, compared with the right people in the economic conditions, the obligor''s financial viability property is clearly higher than the rights holders. Compared with the traffic incident, the obligor''s economic situation is clearly better in most medical events, regardless of the legal interest in the infringement life or physical health of legal interest from the terms of the verdict, and the verdict was not therefore a higher amount of discretion. Finally, from the "plural obligor" observation, it does not seem differ among the obligor large hospitals, small clinics or individual practitioner. We cannot interpret the funding of the obligor level would affect the rights of the person to whom compensation amount from the verdict. Secondly, compared practical cases with other civil event types Germany and Japan, people get the right amount is significantly lower. The main reason is that the court deliberate "defendant’s fault", and the number of judgments are not a minority. In other words, the court held that "the defendant was unintentional" as the reason for the amount of gold consolation reduce it. In addition, the court found due to higher medical risk when the damage occurred to blame the medical staff. We should reduce the responsibility of defendants. Finally, the judges think negligence in patients with special physical causes to lessen the responsibility of defendants. These aggravating factors are not a minority practice. This article takes a conservative view. Whether the amount of the form is to be established in the future, the purpose is to avoid the subjective arbitrary and to assist the parties in assessing the results of litigation and litigation costs. However, about the decision of the amount of gold in medical liability, in distinguishing "the Supreme Court established deliberate Factors" and "Supreme Court of deliberate non-factors", we only consider the "family status", "the degree of injury," and "age" by streamlining the considering factors in the former, by the way we also can achieve the target of saving resources. Besides, judges’ subjective choice and considering factors are unrelated, with objective, external attributes, namely, needless to worry the judge’s arbitrary. On the contrary, considering factors in the latter relate to the value of the judge. Judges should theoretically rigorous use, attaching the specific details of the reasons for taking or not. Therefore, we could seek the equilibrium point between consolation gold objectively and judges of arbitrary.
URSO, ELENA. "Danno morale e danno non patrimoniale. Problemi per una comparazione fra il diritto italiano e il diritto anglo-americano". Doctoral thesis, 1995. http://hdl.handle.net/2158/592002.
Texto completoChen, Pei-Yin y 陳姵吟. "Infringement of Personality Rights due to Non-Performance and Damages for Non-Pecuniary Loss". Thesis, 2016. http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/90472256678062769645.
Texto completo國立臺灣大學
法律學研究所
104
Personality rights are not only the inherent rights for personality achievement but also the foundation that people, as the legal entity, can enjoy all property rights, so that they are the core value to be protected by the Civil Code. In Taiwan Civil Code, the legal basis of non-pecuniary damages in infringement of personality rights was previously provided only in torts; until 1999, when the Part of Obligations of the Civil Code was amended, Article 227-1 was first added. 16 years have passed since Article 227-1 was applied. Whether Article 227-1 has fittingly exerted its system functions and what benefits apart from tort provisions it has brought for the protection of personality rights in Taiwan are the issues worthy of observation and exploration. First of all, in this article, whether there is the real benefit of Article 227-1 better than tort provisions in practice is observed through the statistics and analysis of judgments. Then, it is reviewed whether the legislation way of the mutatis mutandis of tort provisions in Article 227-1 may cause applicable doubts. Besides, for the inappropriateness of the mutatis mutandis of Article 197 short-term limitation period in Article 227-1, it is suggested that in the case personality rights are for contract performance interest, the application of Article 197 should be excluded through teleological reduction. Further, it is noted in this article that personality rights or other legal interests of personality can be the performance interest of contracts; therefore, in addition to incomplete performance, Article 227-1 should be also applicable to impossible performance and deferred performance so that Article 227-1 will be given with the applicable benefit being exclusive of non-performance and independent of torts. At last, in this article, through the concepts of the freedom-of-contract principle, it is attempted to safeguard personality rights or other legal interests of personality more completely in multiple and diversified contract types so as to give Article 227-1 with the positive significance higher than tort provisions.
WEN, KAI-CHENG y 温鍇丞. "A Study on Assessment of the Compensation for Non-pecuniary Loss in Traffic Accident". Thesis, 2017. http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/6k64r3.
Texto completo東吳大學
法律學系
105
With the frequent use of vehicles in daily life, the increasing number of traffic accidents has brought cases of disputes over the amount of compensation to be paid for. Therefore, it is the subject of this study on how to develop a more objective calculation method to calculate reasonable and appropriate amount of compensation for the fact that the amount of compensation for non-property damage cannot be evaluated objectively. This study is divided into five chapters. The first chapter is intended to illustrate the research motives, objectives, methods, research structures and expected results. The second chapter discusses the basis of the claim and the characteristics of the traffic accident compensation, and introduces the meaning of infringement, the constituent elements of infringement claim, and its legal effect. Furthermore, the chapter discusses the meaning and nature of traffic accident compensation as well as the amount of discretion. The third chapter looks into the neighboring countries such as Japan and China on their use of calculation methods in determining the amount of compensation claim, their constituent elements of infringement claims, and their calculation for the non-property damage compensation. The fourth chapter analyses our country’s traffic accident court cases in recent years. Whether or not the court’s decision on a case is determined by the impact on victim, the infringement type, victim’s age, medical treatment, and recuperation time. Chapter five is the conclusion and suggestion for this paper. This study formulated a relatively objective and specific way of calculating non-property damage compensation which includes death and injury, and with a view to achieving a reasonable amount of compensation for each victim. Finally, this study put forward a number of suggestions to get more experts and scholars attention for further research, and to develop a more specific and appropriate solution for traffic accident compensation.
Assunção, Ana Gabriela Lacerda. "O dano não patrimonial e a pessoa colectiva lesada: reflexões sobre a tutela de interesses imateriais". Master's thesis, 2018. http://hdl.handle.net/10316/85734.
Texto completoA presente dissertação respeita à perscrutação da admissibilidade da compensação de danos não patrimoniais a pessoas colectivas e a sua sistematização orienta-se, de um modo progressivo, pelos obstáculos que se têm erguido à compensação destes danos. Metodologicamente, visa construir um processo argumentativo por etapas, em linha com a dinâmica do próprio sistema de responsabilização civil. Pretende estabelecer um diálogo entre a jurisprudência e a doutrina, e colher contributos de diferentes ramos do Direito, sem se afastar da sua matriz de Direito das Obrigações.A presente dissertação respeita à perscrutação da admissibilidade da compensação de danos não patrimoniais a pessoas colectivas e a sua sistematização orienta-se, de um modo progressivo, pelos obstáculos que se têm erguido à compensação destes danos. Metodologicamente, visa construir um processo argumentativo por etapas, em linha com a dinâmica do próprio sistema de responsabilização civil. Pretende estabelecer um diálogo entre a jurisprudência e a doutrina, e colher contributos de diferentes ramos do Direito, sem se afastar da sua matriz de Direito das Obrigações.A presente dissertação respeita à perscrutação da admissibilidade da compensação de danos não patrimoniais a pessoas colectivas e a sua sistematização orienta-se, de um modo progressivo, pelos obstáculos que se têm erguido à compensação destes danos. Metodologicamente, visa construir um processo argumentativo por etapas, em linha com a dinâmica do próprio sistema de responsabilização civil. Pretende estabelecer um diálogo entre a jurisprudência e a doutrina, e colher contributos de diferentes ramos do Direito, sem se afastar da sua matriz de Direito das Obrigações.
This dissertation relates to the admissibility’s assessment of compensation for non-pecuniary losses when the aggrieved party is a legal person and its scheme follows the rationales commonly used to restrain or mitigate these damage’s compensation. Methodologically it is constructed by progressive stages, in line with the civil liability’s system dynamics. It intends to establish a dialogue between court decisions and legal doctrine, and to gather contributions from different law branches without, however, leaving its natural ground within the Law of Obligations framework.This dissertation relates to the admissibility’s assessment of compensation for non-pecuniary losses when the aggrieved party is a legal person and its scheme follows the rationales commonly used to restrain or mitigate these damage’s compensation. Methodologically it is constructed by progressive stages, in line with the civil liability’s system dynamics. It intends to establish a dialogue between court decisions and legal doctrine, and to gather contributions from different law branches without, however, leaving its natural ground within the Law of Obligations framework. This dissertation relates to the admissibility’s assessment of compensation for non-pecuniary losses when the aggrieved party is a legal person and its scheme follows the rationales commonly used to restrain or mitigate these damage’s compensation. Methodologically it is constructed by progressive stages, in line with the civil liability’s system dynamics. It intends to establish a dialogue between court decisions and legal doctrine, and to gather contributions from different law branches without, however, leaving its natural ground within the Law of Obligations framework.
Molnár, Peter. "Náhrada újmy při ublížení na zdraví". Master's thesis, 2015. http://www.nusl.cz/ntk/nusl-333514.
Texto completoLibros sobre el tema "Non pecuniary losse"
Rogers, W. V. Horton, ed. Damages for Non-Pecuniary Loss in a Comparative Perspective. Vienna: Springer Vienna, 2001. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-6264-4.
Texto completoCommission, Great Britain Law. Damages for personal injury: Non-pecuniary loss : a consultation paper. London [England]: H.M.S.O., 1995.
Buscar texto completoChapman, Bruce. Wrongdoing, welfare and damages: Reconsidering the right to recover for non-pecuniary loss. [Toronto, Ont.]: Canadian Law and Economics Association c/o Faculty of Law, University of Toronto, 1994.
Buscar texto completoDamages for personal injury: Non-pecuniary loss : item 2 of the Sixth programme of law reform : Damages. London: The Stationery Office, 1999.
Buscar texto completoCompany's Right to Damages for Non-Pecuniary Loss. Cambridge University Press, 2016.
Buscar texto completoWilcox, Vanessa. Company's Right to Damages for Non-Pecuniary Loss. Cambridge University Press, 2016.
Buscar texto completoWilcox, Vanessa. Company's Right to Damages for Non-Pecuniary Loss. Cambridge University Press, 2016.
Buscar texto completoPalmer, Vernon V. Recovery of Non-Pecuniary Loss in European Contract Law. Cambridge University Press, 2015.
Buscar texto completoWilcox, Vanessa. A Company's Right to Damages for Non-Pecuniary Loss. Cambridge University Press, 2018.
Buscar texto completoPalmer, Vernon V. Recovery of Non-Pecuniary Loss in European Contract Law. Cambridge University Press, 2015.
Buscar texto completoCapítulos de libros sobre el tema "Non pecuniary losse"
Karner, Ernst y Helmut Koziol. "Austria". En Damages for Non-Pecuniary Loss in a Comparative Perspective, 1–27. Vienna: Springer Vienna, 2001. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-6264-4_1.
Texto completoMartín-Casals, Miquel, Jordi Ribot y Josep Solé. "Spain". En Damages for Non-Pecuniary Loss in a Comparative Perspective, 192–243. Vienna: Springer Vienna, 2001. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-6264-4_10.
Texto completoRogers, W. V. H. "Comparative Report of a Project Carried Out by the European Centre for Tort and Insurance Law". En Damages for Non-Pecuniary Loss in a Comparative Perspective, 245–96. Vienna: Springer Vienna, 2001. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-6264-4_11.
Texto completoCousy, Herman y Dimitri Droshout. "Belgium". En Damages for Non-Pecuniary Loss in a Comparative Perspective, 28–53. Vienna: Springer Vienna, 2001. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-6264-4_2.
Texto completoRogers, W. V. H. "England". En Damages for Non-Pecuniary Loss in a Comparative Perspective, 54–86. Vienna: Springer Vienna, 2001. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-6264-4_3.
Texto completoGaland-Carval, Suzanne. "France". En Damages for Non-Pecuniary Loss in a Comparative Perspective, 87–108. Vienna: Springer Vienna, 2001. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-6264-4_4.
Texto completoMagnus, Ulrich y Jörg Fedtke. "Germany". En Damages for Non-Pecuniary Loss in a Comparative Perspective, 109–28. Vienna: Springer Vienna, 2001. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-6264-4_5.
Texto completoKerameus, Konstantinos D. "Greece". En Damages for Non-Pecuniary Loss in a Comparative Perspective, 129–34. Vienna: Springer Vienna, 2001. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-6264-4_6.
Texto completoBusnelli, F. D. y G. Comandé. "Italy". En Damages for Non-Pecuniary Loss in a Comparative Perspective, 135–54. Vienna: Springer Vienna, 2001. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-6264-4_7.
Texto completoWissink, Mark H. y Willem H. van Boom. "The Netherlands". En Damages for Non-Pecuniary Loss in a Comparative Perspective, 155–72. Vienna: Springer Vienna, 2001. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-6264-4_8.
Texto completo