Literatura académica sobre el tema "Maxillary sinus graft"
Crea una cita precisa en los estilos APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard y otros
Consulte las listas temáticas de artículos, libros, tesis, actas de conferencias y otras fuentes académicas sobre el tema "Maxillary sinus graft".
Junto a cada fuente en la lista de referencias hay un botón "Agregar a la bibliografía". Pulsa este botón, y generaremos automáticamente la referencia bibliográfica para la obra elegida en el estilo de cita que necesites: APA, MLA, Harvard, Vancouver, Chicago, etc.
También puede descargar el texto completo de la publicación académica en formato pdf y leer en línea su resumen siempre que esté disponible en los metadatos.
Artículos de revistas sobre el tema "Maxillary sinus graft"
Wang, Xuan, Tianqi Zhang, Enli Yang, Zhiyuan Gong, Hongzhou Shen, Haiwei Wu y Dongsheng Zhang. "Biomechanical Analysis of Grafted and Nongrafted Maxillary Sinus Augmentation in the Atrophic Posterior Maxilla with Three-Dimensional Finite Element Method". Scanning 2020 (2 de octubre de 2020): 1–8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/8419319.
Texto completoJiang, Yanbo, Ming Gong, Donghui Chen, Jiaojie Li, Hailun Zhou, Yongfeng Lin y Li Tang. "Maxillary sinus pneumatization and augmentation: A three-dimensional finite element analysis". Materials Express 11, n.º 11 (1 de noviembre de 2021): 1892–900. http://dx.doi.org/10.1166/mex.2021.2087.
Texto completoSharma, Ashu y G. R. Rahul. "Zygomatic Implants/Fixture: A Systematic Review". Journal of Oral Implantology 39, n.º 2 (1 de abril de 2013): 215–24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1563/aaid-joi-d-11-00055.
Texto completoPark, Won-Bae, Nam-Jun Cho y Philip Kang. "Tomographic Imaging of Mucociliary Clearance Following Maxillary Sinus Augmentation: A Case Series". Medicina 58, n.º 5 (18 de mayo de 2022): 672. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina58050672.
Texto completoCamargo Filho, Geraldo Prestes de, Luciana Corrêa, Claudio Costa, Claudio Mendes Pannuti, Rainer Schmelzeisen y João Gualberto de Cerqueira Luz. "Comparative study of two autogenous graft techniques using piezosurgery for sinus lifting". Acta Cirurgica Brasileira 25, n.º 6 (diciembre de 2010): 485–89. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/s0102-86502010000600005.
Texto completoBeatriz Cepeda De Romero, Arley Diaz Palacios, Adalberto De Jesús Atencia Romero y Giovana Lobelo Goméz. "Prevalence of complications of maxillary sinus grafts". International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research Updates 3, n.º 2 (30 de agosto de 2022): 011–16. http://dx.doi.org/10.53430/ijmru.2022.3.2.0048.
Texto completoBernardello, Fabio, Teresa Lombardi y Claudio Stacchi. "Clearance of Bone Substitute in Gel Form Accidentally Dispersed into the Sinus Cavity during Transcrestal Maxillary Sinus Floor Elevation: Two-Case Report". Sinusitis 5, n.º 2 (27 de octubre de 2021): 132–40. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/sinusitis5020014.
Texto completoOLIVEIRA, Ronaldo Andrade Figueiredo de, Maria Cristina PEDRAZINI y Thomaz WASSALL. "Relative area measurement of maxillary sinus by computed tomography". RGO - Revista Gaúcha de Odontologia 62, n.º 2 (junio de 2014): 111–16. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1981-863720140002000012556.
Texto completoChaves, Lucas Lenyn Vieira, Lucas P. Lopes Rosado, Saulo Machado Piccolo, Liana Matos Ferreira, Kivanç Kamburoglu, Rafael Binato Junqueira, Maurício Augusto Aquino de Castro y Francielle Silestre Verner. "Evaluation of the Maxillary Sinus of Patients with Maxillary Posterior Implants: A CBCT Cross-Sectional Study". Diagnostics 12, n.º 12 (15 de diciembre de 2022): 3169. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12123169.
Texto completoAl-Noori, Noor Mohammed y Fatima Ali Makawi. "Techniques and Graft Materials Used in Maxillary Sinus Lift Procedure for Dental Implant Placement". European Journal of Dental and Oral Health 3, n.º 4 (31 de agosto de 2022): 6–10. http://dx.doi.org/10.24018/ejdent.2022.3.4.198.
Texto completoTesis sobre el tema "Maxillary sinus graft"
Filho, Geraldo Prestes de Camargo. "Estudo comparativo de duas técnicas de enxerto autógeno utilizando piezocirurgia para levantamento de seio maxilar". Universidade de São Paulo, 2010. http://www.teses.usp.br/teses/disponiveis/23/23149/tde-30082010-150345/.
Texto completoMaxillary sinus lifting is a technique which presents as a possible complication the sinus membrane perforation. The use of ultrasonic devices is presented as an interesting tool, particularly safe and efficient to perform ostectomies of sinus wall and dissection of sinus membrane. This study aimed to compare two techniques that used ultrasound surgery to perform autogenous graft for maxillary sinus lifting. Ten rabbits were used in the study, one of which did not undergo surgery. The other nine rabbits had their maxillary sinuses filled with autogenous bone grafts collected from the external skull diploe in particulate form on the right side and shaved on the left side, both with ultrasonic device. Data on bone density in left and right maxillary sinus, obtained by computed tomography in transverse and longitudinal sections, recorded 90 days after the grafts, were compared statistically. Histological sections of the grafted areas were performed with descriptive purposes. There were no statistically significant differences between the two techniques that used shaved and particulate bone collected by means of ultrasonic device of the skull of rabbits. Histological aspects after 90 days were similar in both groups, showing mature bone through a fibrous connective tissue. Operatory assessment procedures leads us to conclude that the piezoelectric ultrasound showed as a safe tool in the surgical approach of the maxillary sinus of rabbits, allowing the maintenance of sinus membrane integrity during surgical procedures.
Jungner, Måns. "Healing of endosseous implants with different surface characteristics in grafted and non-grafted bone : clinical and experimental studies". Doctoral thesis, Umeå universitet, Institutionen för odontologi, 2014. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-85884.
Texto completoRocha, Caroline Andrade. "Avaliação comparativa da neoformação óssea após enxertia de HA/TCPp, Bio-Oss e osso autógeno associados ou não ao PRP em cirurgias de levantamento de seio maxilar de coelhos". Universidade de São Paulo, 2015. http://www.teses.usp.br/teses/disponiveis/25/25149/tde-10032016-113037/.
Texto completoThis study investigated the bone gain and quality achieved by utilization of biphasic porous ceramic HA/TCPp compared to autogenous bone graft and Bio-Oss® associated or not with platelet-rich plasma (PRP), in maxillary sinus lift surgeries in rabbits. Bilateral sinus lift was performed in 54 rabbits, being one side filled with graft/biomaterial and blood (SG) and the contralateral side was filled with graft/biomaterial and PRP, and the treatment groups were designed as HA/TCPp/SG, HA/TCPp/PRP, AUT/SG, AUT/PRP, Bio-Oss/SG and Bio-Oss/PRP. After periods of 30, 60 and 180 days (n=18/period), the histological specimens were collected and fixed in buffered 10% formalin. Following, microtomographic images were obtained and the specimens were histologically processed. The volume and height of the lifted maxillary sinus were determined on the microtomographic images, and the percentage and volume of graft/biomaterial and bone tissue were morphometrically evaluated on the histological sections by point counting volumetry. Data were compared by threeway ANOVA and the means were compared by the Tukey test, at significance level of 5%. The volume and height of the lifted maxillary sinus were stable in the groups Bio- Oss and HA/TCP, with mean values of 154.9mm3 and 5.6mm between 30 and 180 days respectively, while in the group AUT the same dimensions were reduced in 33.3% and 21.7%, respectively. The autogenous graft exhibited fast resorption with concomitant intense new bone formation and remodeling up to 60 days. Between 60 and 180 days, the increase in bone volume was not maintained, reducing in 52.5%. The association of AUT graft with PRP accelerated the new bone formation/remodeling process and the osteoclastic resorption of grafted particles. Conversely, the volume of Bio-Oss® and HA/TCP was nearly unchanged throughout the period and bone formation occurred in the spaces between particles, filling a mean volume of 42.85mm3 at 60 days, which was maintained up to 180 days. The addition of PRP to the biomaterials Bio-Oss® and HA/TCPp did not promote changes in the quantity of newly formed bone, yet accelerated its maturation in relation to groups associated with SG. The three materials presently used for maxillary sinus lift allowed significant bone formation, yet the volume gain was stable in the groups HA/TCP and Bio-Oss but not in the group AUT, in which this volume was dramatically reduced due to the accelerated bone remodeling, with predominance of osteoclastic resorption associated with sinus pressure. It was concluded that, the bone gain in maxillary sinus lift with HA/TCPp or Bio-Oss remains stable because it offers better strength against the sinus pressure and pneumatization compared to that obtained with autograft. The association of PRP with the autogenous graft accelerates the process of bone formation/remodeling, yet its association with HA/TCPp or Bio-Oss does not influence the final bone volume gain, but increases the rate of bone maturation.
Alayan, Jamil. "Maxillary Sinus Augmentation - a histological, clinical, radiographic and patient centred assessment". Thesis, Griffith University, 2018. http://hdl.handle.net/10072/381656.
Texto completoThesis (PhD Doctorate)
Doctor of Philosophy (PhD)
School of Dentistry&Oral Hlth
Griffith Health
Full Text
Johansson, Björn. "Bone grafts and dental implants in the reconstruction of the severely atrophied, edentulous maxilla /". Uppsala : Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis : Univ.-bibl. [distributör], 2001. http://publications.uu.se/theses/91-554-4962-X/.
Texto completoBomfim, Bianca Bravim [UNESP]. "Regeneração óssea guiada com o uso de membrana de copolímero PLA/PGA em levantamento da membrana do seio maxilar: estudo experimental com análises histomorfométrica e imunoistoquímica". Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), 2015. http://hdl.handle.net/11449/133943.
Texto completoApproved for entry into archive by Juliano Benedito Ferreira (julianoferreira@reitoria.unesp.br) on 2016-01-29T15:08:29Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1 bomfim_bb_dr_araca.pdf: 75671195 bytes, checksum: 7dea3472294f07732ed6f7e28c426429 (MD5)
Made available in DSpace on 2016-01-29T15:08:29Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 bomfim_bb_dr_araca.pdf: 75671195 bytes, checksum: 7dea3472294f07732ed6f7e28c426429 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2015-12-17
A utilização de biomateriais em implantodontia, principalmente em casos em que o leito receptor do implante apresenta quantidade e qualidade ósseas inadequadas, se torna importante. Diversos estudos mostram a possibilidade do usar copolímeros de PLA/PGA, no entanto, estes mesmos estudos mostram que a proporção de PLA e PGA irá influenciar a taxa de degradação do copolímero. Portanto, objetivo desse estudo foi avaliar o comportamento biológico do copolímero de PLA/PGA como substitutos ósseos para técnica de levantamento da membrana do seio maxilar por meio de análises histomorfométrica e imunoistoquímica. Vinte coelhos machos, branco, da raça Nova Zelândia, cada um pesando cerca de 3,0 kg, foram utilizados e foram divididos em dois grupos de acordo com o material de preenchimento do seio: grupo coágulo (GC) e grupo copolímero (GP). Foi realizado descolamento bilateral da membrana sinusal com períodos de eutanásia aso 3, 10, 20 e 40 dias para as análises histomorfométricas e imunoistoquímica para a expressão de osteocalcina (OC). De uma forma geral, para todas as variáveis avaliadas, a diferença estatisticamente significante mostrou-se entre 3 e 10 dias pós-operatórios (p<0,05), como pode ser demostrado também na expressão de OC. Foi possível concluir que o copolímero PLA/PGA mostrou-se capaz de conduzir o processo de formação óssea, mantendo o volume inicial, impedindo o colabamento da membrana com a parede do seio, como pode ser observado em GC.
The use of biomaterials in dental implantology, especially in cases where the receptor region of implant has inadequate bone quantity and quality, becomes important. Several studies have shown the possibility to use copolymers of PLA / PGA, however these same studies show that the proportion of PLA and PGA copolymer will influence the degradation rate. So the aim of this study was to evaluate the biological behavior of PLA / PGA copolymer as bone substitutes for lifting technique of the maxillary sinus membrane through histomorphometric and immunohistochemical analyzes. Twenty male rabbits, white, New Zealand race, each weighing about 3.0 kg, were used and were divided into two groups in accordance with within the filling material: Clot group (CG) and a copolymer group (PG) . Were realized the bilateral sinus lift of rabbits and inserted the respective materials with euthanasia periods as 3, 10, 20 and 40 days for histomorphometric and immunohistochemical analysis for the expression of osteocalcin (OC). In general, for all variables, a statistically significant difference was shown between 3 and 10 days postoperatively (p <0.05), as can be demonstrated also in OC expression. It was concluded that the PLA / PGA copolymer was shown to be able to conduct the process of bone formation, maintaining the initial volume, preventing the collapse of the membrane with the sinus wall, as can be observed in GC.
Melo, Willian Morais de. "Osso autógeno associado a osso bovino inorgânico (GenOx Inorg®) para aumento do soalho do seio maxilar e instalação de implantes: análise comparativa do potencial osteogênico de culturas de células derivadas do sítio doador e do sítio de implantação". Universidade de São Paulo, 2012. http://www.teses.usp.br/teses/disponiveis/58/58136/tde-10082012-163454/.
Texto completoObjectives: This study aimed to comparatively evaluate the in vitro osteogenic potential of cells obtained from the mandibular ramus (MR, autogenous bone donor site) and from the maxillary sinus bone grafted with a mixture of anorganic bovine bone (ABB) and MR prior to titanium implant placement (MS, grafted implant site). Material and methods: Cells were obtained from three patients subjected to maxillary sinus floor augmentation with a 1:1 mixture of ABB (GenOx Inorg®) and MR. At the time of the sinus lift procedure and after 8 months, prior to implant placement, bone fragments were taken from MR and MS, respectively, and subjected to trypsin-collagenase digestion for primary cell culturing. Subcultured cells were grown under osteogenic condition for up 21 days and assayed for proliferation/viability, osteoblast marker mRNA levels, alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity and calcium content/Alizarin red staining. ALP activity was also determined in primary explant cultures exposed to GenOx Inorg® (1:1 with MR) for 7 days. Data were compared using the two-way ANOVA followed by the Tukey test; otherwise, the Mann-Whitney test was used. Results: MS cultures exhibited a significantly lower osteogenic potential compared with MR cultures, with a progressive increase in cell proliferation together with a downregulation of osteoblast markers, reduced ALP activity and calcium content. Exposure of MR-derived primary cultures to GenOx Inorg® inhibited ALP activity. Conclusion: These results suggest that the use of GenOx Inorg® in combination with MR fragments for maxillary sinus floor augmentation inhibits the osteoblast cell differentiation at the implant site in the longterm.
Schlund, Matthias. "Sinus graft infection management: systematic review". Master's thesis, 2021. http://hdl.handle.net/10284/10729.
Texto completoO objetivo deste estudo foi revisar sistematicamente o manejo da infecção do enxerto sinusal, a fim de definir quais protocolos deveriam ser implementados. Os termos pesquisados em cada banco de dados foram “gerenciamento de infecção de enxerto de seio maxilar”, “infecção de elevação do seio maxilar”, “infecção de enxerto de seio maxilar”, “infecção de elevação do seio maxilar”, “infecção de aumento do seio maxilar”. O resultado avaliou a saúde do seio maxilar e o resultado implantológico. A pesquisa inicial gerou 1190 resultados. 18 artigos foram incluídos contando 3319 pacientes e 217 infecções de enxerto de seio. Em todos os estudos, todos os pacientes obtiveram finalmente um seio nasal livre de doença, mas o resultado em relação ao enxerto e ao implante dentário foi mais variado. Não é possível definir o melhor protocolo de tratamento para infecções de enxerto sinusal com base nos dados publicados, uma vez que o nível de evidência é baixo. A gestão é muito heterogênea. Esta revisão destacou a necessidade de tratamento cirúrgico associado à antibioticoterapia.
Cheng, Hsiang-Yuan y 鄭翔元. "Retrospective Analysis of Graft Height Changes after Dental Implantation Combining Maxillary Sinus Augmentation". Thesis, 2011. http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/am7k5p.
Texto completo國立臺灣大學
臨床牙醫學研究所
99
Background: Dental implant therapy has become a standard rehabilitation method for patients suffered from missing teeth in the posterior maxilla. Because of disuse atrophy and continuous pneumatization of the maxillary sinus, insufficient bone height for dental implantation is common in the posterior maxilla which necessitates sinus augmentation to increase the bone volume. In this surgical technique the Schneiderian membrane is elevated and then bone graft materials are placed into the newly created subantral space to increase bone volume for implant therapy. Previous studies showed that the survival rates for dental implants in combination with sinus augmentation are high. However, the long-term stability of sinus graft and factors influencing graft stability have seldom been examined. Purpose: By examination of the changes in sinus graft volume over a long period and analysis of the relations between graft alteration and various clinical parameters, the long-term efficacy of the sinus augmentation technique is determined. Materials and Methods: Patients who received dental implantation in combination with sinus augmentation at the Department of Oral Maxillofacial Surgery, National Taiwan University Hospital during 2002 to 2008 were included in the study. A total of 47 patients were followed for at least two years. Macroporous biphasic calcium phosphate (MBCP) or deproteinized freeze dried bone allograft (DFDBA) were used as graft materials in 60 maxillary sinus augmentation with total 102 implants. Clinical factors that may influence implant success and graft stability were recorded. Changes in graft height were calculated in three locations, 2 mm mesial to implant, directly above implant, and 2 mm distal to implant. The GSH ratio (follow-up grafted sius height versus original sius height) were calculated as follow-up grafted sinus height versus original sinus height. The relationship between grafted sinus floor and implant was classified into three groups: Group I, in which the grafted sinus floor was above the implant apex; Group II, in which the implant apex was level with the grafted sinus floor; and Group III, in which the grafted sinus floor was below the implant apex. The relations between various clinical parameters and implant success or graft stability were analyzed statistically by Chi Square Test, Student t Test, Logistic Regression Model. Results: There were 2 implants defined as failure, and the overall implant success rate was 98.03%. No clinical factor was significantly related to implant success, all P>0.05. In average, the long term graft change at the site 2 mm mesial to implant was 1.55±2.29 mm (mean±SD)(loss 20.02%); directly above implant was 1.08±1.50 mm (loss 11.09%); 2 mm distal to implant was 1.42±2.27 mm (loss 14.67%). When DFDBA grafts were considered separately, the long term change at the site 2 mm mesial to implant was 3.17±2.50 mm (loss 40.25%); directly above implant was 1.52±1.33 mm (loss 14.78%); 2 mm distal to implant was 3.21±2.50 mm (loss 35.02%). In MBCP group, the long term change at the site 2 mm mesial to implant was 0.84±1.80 mm (loss 10.95%); directly above implant was 0.90±1.54 mm (loss 9.54%): 2 mm distal to implant was 0.65±1.67 mm (loss 5.95%). For all sinus grafts, the mean follow-up GSH ratio 2 mm mesial to implant was 1.87±4.58; 2 mm distal to implant was 3.51±3.77. Loss of graft height at mesial site was smaller than that at the distal, and the difference was significant statistically (P<0.05). In DFDBA group, the follow-up GSH ratio at the site 2 mm mesial to implant was 0.66±0.82; 2 mm distal to implant was 3.23±3.14. And the difference was significant statistically (P<0.05). In MBCP group, follow-up GSH ratio at the site 2 mm mesial to implant was 2.43±5.6; 2 mm distal to implant was 3.63±4.03, but the difference was not significant statiscally (P>0.05). The relations between grafted sinus floor and implant apex were as follows: 73 implants (72.2%) were in group I, 11 implants (10.8%) group II, 17 implants (16.8%) group III. In DFDBA group, 15 implants (50.00%) were in group I, 2 implants (6.67%) group II, 13 implants (43.33%) group III. In MBCP group, 58 implants (81.69%) were in group I, 9 implants (12.68%) group II, 4 implants (5.63%) group III. Concerning the relations between graft stability and various clinical parameters were, we found that: graft materials, implant related location, intraoperative sinus membrane perforation and method of access window protection, were significantly associated with graft stability. The grafts were significantly more stable when MBCP was used comparing to DFDBA (P<0.05). Graft changes were significantly more obvious mesial to the implants comparing to the distal aspects (P<0.05). Graft loss was noted if membrane perforation happened during augmentation surgery (P<0.05). Graft changes were more marked when access windows were protected by collagen membrane comparing to window bone plate replacement (P<0.05). Conclusions: Sinus augmentation is now a routine bone graft technique for implant therapy. In the retrospective study, we noted that sinus grafts decfeased in size in the long term, although this phenomenon was not related to implant success. We also found that graft material, implant related location, intraoperative sinus membrane perforation were factors associated with long term graft stability.
esquillo, mariusse chars y 馬俐歐. "IMPLANT REHABILITATION OF SEVERELY ATROPHIED MAXILLARY ALVEOLAR RIDGE AFTER LATERAL TRAP DOOR WINDOW SINUS LIFT TECHNIQUE WITHOUT BONE GRAFT". Thesis, 2009. http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/28324109143988538148.
Texto completo國立陽明大學
臨床牙醫學研究所
98
Bone quantity and quality play an important role in the rehabilitation of edentulous ridges. Anatomic considerations such as in early loss of maxillary posterior teeth leads to rapid resorption of bone in the alveolar process below the maxillary sinus. In order to compensate for the loss bone, augmentation of the maxillary sinus floor is required using sinus lift procedure. The classic procedure for the augmentation entails the preparation of a trap door to elevate the Schneiderian membrane in the lateral sinus wall. While autogenous bone has long been considered the gold standard grafting material because of its osteoinductive and osteoconductive properties, alternative materials have, in general, no osteoinductive potential but are considered to provide a scaffold for optimal bone growth. More so, autogenous bone grafting presents a major disadvantage in requiring a second surgical site with associated morbidity. Recent cases of immediate implant placement in maxillary alveolar ridge after performing sinus lift without bone graft challenges the utility of conventional approach involving placement of filling materials into the sinus space created during the sinus lift procedure. It is conceivable that that formation of new bone in the maxillary sinus does not require the presence of various grafts as scaffolds, rather, the maintenance of space for blood clot formation followed by the resorption and deposition of bone cells derived from the sinus periosteum or peripheral cancellous marrow in the maxilla is proposed to explain the appearance of new bone in the maxillary sinus. This study aims to review the survival of implant cases which underwent the implant placement after sinus lift without bone graft performed at Taipei Veterans General Hospital – Department of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery.
Libros sobre el tema "Maxillary sinus graft"
T, Jensen Ole, ed. The sinus bone graft. 2a ed. Chicago: Quintessence Pub. Co., 2006.
Buscar texto completoT, Jensen Ole, ed. The sinus bone graft. Chicago: Quintessence Pub. Co., 1998.
Buscar texto completoJensen, Ole T. The Sinus Bone Graft. Quintessence Publishing (IL), 1999.
Buscar texto completoCapítulos de libros sobre el tema "Maxillary sinus graft"
Kim, David Minjoon y Daniel Kuan-te Ho. "Choices of Bone Graft Materials". En Clinical Maxillary Sinus Elevation Surgery, 157–64. Hoboken, NJ, USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9781118871331.ch13.
Texto completoRinaldi, Marco, Scott D. Ganz y Angelo Mottola. "Maxillary Edentulism, Bone Grafts, Sinus Graft, Computer Implant Surgery". En Computer-Guided Applications for Dental Implants, Bone Grafting, and Reconstructive Surgery (Adapted Translation), 370–80. Elsevier, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-323-27803-4.15027-5.
Texto completoKeun, Jeong y Yong Seok. "Outfracture Osteotomy Sinus Graft: A Modified Technique Convenient for Maxillary Sinus Lifting". En A Textbook of Advanced Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. InTech, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/53301.
Texto completoSohn, Dong-Seok. "New Bone Formation in the Maxillary Sinus With/Without Bone Graft". En Implant Dentistry - The Most Promising Discipline of Dentistry. InTech, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/16512.
Texto completoRinaldi, Marco, Scott D. Ganz y Angelo Mottola. "Maxillary Edentulism, Sinus Graft With Heterologous Bone Block Preformed on a Stereolithographic Model". En Computer-Guided Applications for Dental Implants, Bone Grafting, and Reconstructive Surgery (Adapted Translation), 412–22. Elsevier, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-323-27803-4.15032-9.
Texto completoRinaldi, Marco, Scott D. Ganz y Angelo Mottola. "Maxillary Edentulism, Bone Grafts, Sinus Grafts, Tilted Implants". En Computer-Guided Applications for Dental Implants, Bone Grafting, and Reconstructive Surgery (Adapted Translation), 341–50. Elsevier, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-323-27803-4.15025-1.
Texto completoRinaldi, Marco, Scott D. Ganz y Angelo Mottola. "Maxillary Edentulism, Bone Grafts, Sinus Grafts, Computer Implant Surgery". En Computer-Guided Applications for Dental Implants, Bone Grafting, and Reconstructive Surgery (Adapted Translation), 279–91. Elsevier, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-323-27803-4.15020-2.
Texto completoRinaldi, Marco, Scott D. Ganz y Angelo Mottola. "Maxillary Edentulism, Bone Grafts, Sinus Grafts, Computer Implant Surgery". En Computer-Guided Applications for Dental Implants, Bone Grafting, and Reconstructive Surgery (Adapted Translation), 327–40. Elsevier, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-323-27803-4.15024-x.
Texto completoBallini, Andrea, Michele Scivetti, Stefania Cantore, Biagio Rapone, Gianfranco Favia y Felice Roberto. "Tissuue Engineering in Maxillar Sinus Lifting: A Comparation of Differents Grafts and Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopic Evaluation". En Bone Regeneration. InTech, 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/32942.
Texto completo