Tesis sobre el tema "Judicial review of legislative acts"
Crea una cita precisa en los estilos APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard y otros
Consulte los 49 mejores tesis para su investigación sobre el tema "Judicial review of legislative acts".
Junto a cada fuente en la lista de referencias hay un botón "Agregar a la bibliografía". Pulsa este botón, y generaremos automáticamente la referencia bibliográfica para la obra elegida en el estilo de cita que necesites: APA, MLA, Harvard, Vancouver, Chicago, etc.
También puede descargar el texto completo de la publicación académica en formato pdf y leer en línea su resumen siempre que esté disponible en los metadatos.
Explore tesis sobre una amplia variedad de disciplinas y organice su bibliografía correctamente.
Grogan, John. "Emergency law: judicial control of executive power under the states of emergency in South Africa". Thesis, Rhodes University, 1989. http://hdl.handle.net/10962/d1003189.
Texto completoMagalhâes, Pedro C. "The limits to judicialization legislative politics and constitutional review in the Iberian democracies /". Connect to this title online, 2003. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc%5Fnum=osu1046117531.
Texto completoTitle from first page of PDF file. Document formatted into pages; contains xvii, 398 p.: ill. Includes abstract and vita. Advisor: Richard Gunther, Dept. of Political Science. Includes bibliographical references (p. 364-398).
Blom, Christian. "Judicial review of regulatory acts : new prospects for private applicants after the Lisbon reform". Thesis, Stockholms universitet, Juridiska institutionen, 2015. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:su:diva-115495.
Texto completoThackeray, Vincent Gregory. "Inconsistencies in the rights of review of the merits of Commonwealth administrative decisions /". [St. Lucia, Qld.], 2001. http://adt.library.uq.edu.au/public/adt-QU20020821.171741/index.html.
Texto completoZarei, Mohammad Hossein. "The applicability of the principles of Judicial review to the delegated legislative powers of ministers". Thesis, University of Manchester, 1998. http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.496373.
Texto completoMagalhães, Pedro C. "The Limits to Judicialization: Legislative Politics and Constitutional Review in the Iberian Democracies". The Ohio State University, 2003. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=osu1046117531.
Texto completoAngiolucci, Maria de Lurdes Aparecida Trujillo. "O controle judicial dos atos administrativos discricionários e a jurisprudência". Universidade de São Paulo, 2014. http://www.teses.usp.br/teses/disponiveis/2/2134/tde-21082017-153306/.
Texto completoThis research aims to examine some of the numerous decisions of the Supremo Tribunal Federal and Superior Tribunal de Justiça, as well as the Tribunal de Justiça de São Paulo, regarding judicial control of discretionary administrative acts and verify that is possible to identify substantial change in the limits of this control. The work was divided into two parts, the first consisting of a literature research aimed essentially to place the issue of administrative discretion, in a conceptual and historical focus. The second part refers to research on the topic in the jurisprudence of the Supremo Tribunal Federal, Superior Tribunal de Justiça, Tribunal de Justiça do Estado de São Paulo and also in the judgment on the civil appeal nº. 1422 of the Tribunal de Justiça do Rio Grande do Norte, whose rapporteur was entrusted to Miguel Seabra Fagundes. Discretionary administrative acts were long disregarded by the judiciary, in other words immune to judicial review. However, it is possible to identify the rise of some legal parameters that aimed to restrict the discretionary administrative activity by inserting it, in certain respects, within the scope of judicial review. The initial marking was restricted to the law, remaining the substance of the administrative act untouched. In this process to attempt to contain discretionary administrative acts were developed theories of control, as the deviation of power and the theory of determinants reasons. Is mentioned, too, the theory of indeterminate legal concepts and, more recently, the theory of binding administrative acts to constitutional principles. The merit of the administrative act is the space that still shows some controversies. The jurisprudential research was conducted, for the most part, directly on the websites of the respective Court. It is noted, when considering the case law, that there is a trend in the STF and STJ to welcome the idea of a wider appreciation by the judiciary, like was the case Resp 429570/GO, whose rapporteur was in the responsibility of the Minister Eliana Calmon, although it is still quite common, the judgments stating that it is not for consideration by the judiciary under the aspect of convenience and opportunity of the administrative act, in other words, the act of merit.
Plasket, Clive. "The fundamental right to just administrative action: judicial review of administrative action in the democratic South Africa". Thesis, Rhodes University, 2003. http://hdl.handle.net/10962/d1003208.
Texto completoSillay, Stephanie L. "Arbitral veto authority, legislative bargaining, and patterns of consensus formation an exploration of abstract judicial review and referenda as legislative arbitrators in Hungary and Switzerland /". [Bloomington, Ind.] : Indiana University, 2008. http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&res_dat=xri:pqdiss&rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3344600.
Texto completoTitle from home page (viewed on Oct 6, 2009). Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 70-02, Section: A, page: 0678. Adviser: Michael D. McGinnis.
Birkeland, Gustav. "Judicial Review of Procedural Acts of the European Public Prosecutor’s Office : A Legal Analysis of Article 42 of the Regulation on the Establishment of the European Public Prosecutor’s Office". Thesis, Uppsala universitet, Juridiska institutionen, 2020. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-407927.
Texto completoLetteau, Gabrielle Tracey. "A court without resort? comparative aspects of the "Act of State" doctrine : traditional limitations on the judiciary's power of review, and its implications for Hong Kong's court of final appeals /". Click to view the E-thesis via HKUTO, 1996. http://sunzi.lib.hku.hk/HKUTO/record/B38627826.
Texto completoHanf, Christian. "Rechtsschutz gegen Inhalts- und Nebenbestimmungen zu Verwaltungsakten /". Frankfurt am Main [u.a.] : Lang, 2003. http://www.gbv.de/dms/spk/sbb/recht/toc/371109213.pdf.
Texto completoHopkins, Elana. "Grounds for review of administrative action : the interaction between the constitution, the act and the common law". Thesis, Stellenbosch : Stellenbosch University, 2000. http://hdl.handle.net/10019.1/51779.
Texto completoENGLISH ABSTRACT: South African administrative law has undergone drastic changes since the inception of the interim Constitution, which elevated 'administrative justice' to a constitutionally entrenched fundamental right in section 24. Although the successor of this section, the 'must administrative action' clause in section 33 FC, did not enter into force on 5 February 1996 with the rest of the Constitution, it required more changes to administrative law in the form of legislation, when read together with item 23 Schedule 6 FC. The two most significant factors that brought about change were the passage of the Promotion of Administrative Justice Act 3 of 2000 in terms of section 33 FC read with item 23 Schedule 6, and the ruling of the Constitutional Court in the Pharmaceutical Manufacturers case. This study shows that in order to give effect to the requirements of the Constitution, the Promotion of Administrative Justice Act and the ruling of the Constitutional Court, administrative law must be reorganised. When this happens, section 33 FC, which gives force to the common law that informs administrative law, becomes the starting point in administrative law matters. Although the Act exists under the Constitution and parallel to the common law, Parliament foresees that the Act and the common law will in time become one system of law. It further provides for the direct application of the Constitution by those who cannot find a remedy in the Act. The study further shows that, as not all the common law constitutional principles that previously provided the common law grounds for review of administrative action have been taken up by the Constitution, the possibility exists that some of the common law grounds do not continue to be relevant to the review of administrative action. The Act, which articulates the right to 'just administrative action' as viewed by government, contains most of the common law grounds for review. It is therefore argued that, after the Act has entered into force, the continued relevance of those that have been omitted from the Act, needs to be determined before they can be used through the direct application of section 33 FC. To test for relevance, the requirements in section 33(1) Fe, 'lawfulness', reasonableness' and 'procedural fairness', are therefore interpreted in the study in order to determine which statutory grounds relate to each and which common law grounds have been omitted from the Act. The conclusion reached is that grounds available for the review of administrative action consist of the statutory grounds for review together with the omitted common law grounds that continue to be relevant to the judicial review of administrative action.
AFRIKAANSE OPSOMMING: Sedert die inwerkingtreding van die interim Grondwet, wat 'administratiewe gerigtigheid' tot 'n grondwetlike reg verhef het in artikel 24, het die Suid-Afrikaanse administratiefreg drastiese veranderinge ondergaan. Al het die reg op 'n 'regverdige administratiewe optrede' in artikel33 FG nie op 5 Februarie 1996 in werking getree saam met die res van die Grondwet nie, het die klousule nog veranderinge, in die vorm van wetgewing, vereis. Die twee belangrikste faktore wat veranderinge to gevolg gehad het, was die aanneming van die Wet op die Bevordering van Administratiewe Geregtigheid, Wet 3 van 2000, en die beslissing van die Konstitusionele Hof in die Pharmaceutical Manufacturers-saak. Hierdie studie bevind dat die administratiefreg heringedeel sal moet word om effek te gee aan die vereistes van die Grondwet, die Wet op die Bevordering van Administratiewe Geregtigheid en die beslissing van die Konstitutionele Hof. As dit plaasvind, word artikel 33 FG, wat aan die gemenereg krag verleën, die beginpunt in administratiefregtelike aangeleenthede. Al bestaan die Wet onder die Grondwet en parallel tot die gemenereg, voorsien die regering dat die Wet en die gemenereg in die toekoms een stelsel word. Daar word verder voorsiening gemaak vir die direkte toegpassing van artikel33 deur persone wat nie 'n remedie in die Wet kan vind nie. Die studie bevind verder dat, omdat al die gemeenregtelike konstitusionele beginsels wat voorheen die gronde van hersiening verskaf het nie in die Grondwet opgeneem is nie, die moontlikheid bestaan dat sekere van die gemeenregtelike gronde nie relevant bly vir die hersiening van administratiewe handelinge nie. Die Wet, wat die reg op 'n '[r]egverdige administratiewe optrede' verwoord soos dit gesien word deur die regering, bevat meeste van die gemeenregtelike gronde van hersiening. Daarom word daar geargumenteer dat die voortgesette relevantheid van die gemeenregtelike gronde van hersiening wat uitgelaat is uit die Wet eers bepaal moet word voordat hulle gebruik kan word deur die direkte toepassing van artikel 33 nadat die Wet in werking getree het. Om te toets vir relevantheid, moet die vereistes in artikel 33 FG, 'regmatigheid', 'redelikheid' en 'prosedurele billikheid' geïnterpreteer word om te bepaal watter statutêre gronde onder elk klassifiseer en watter gemmenregtelike gronde uitgelaat is uit die Wet. Die gevolgtrekking is dat die gronde van hersiening beskikbaar vir die hersiening van administratiewe handelinge bestaan uit statutêre gronde van hersiening sowel as die weggelate gemeenregtelike gronde van hersiening wat relevant bly vir die judisiële hersiening van administratiewe handelinge.
Ward, Ian Robert. "Misleading government information : an analysis of the legal remedies available to affected citizens". Thesis, University of British Columbia, 1985. http://hdl.handle.net/2429/24439.
Texto completoLaw, Peter A. Allard School of
Graduate
Bednar, Jeannine. "The extent to which review for unreasonableness is meaningfully incorporated in the promotion of Administrative Justice Act No. 3 of 2000". Thesis, Rhodes University, 2006. http://eprints.ru.ac.za/320/.
Texto completoArmstrong, Gillian Claire. "Administrative justice and tribunals in South Africa : a commonwealth comparison". Thesis, Stellenbosch : Stellenbosch University, 2011. http://hdl.handle.net/10019.1/17997.
Texto completoENGLISH ABSTRACT: In the field of administrative law, the judiciary has traditionally exercised control over the administrative actions of the executive through judicial review. However, judicial review is neither the most effective nor the most efficient primary control mechanism for systemic administrative improvement. In a country faced with a task of =transformative constitutionalism‘, and hindered with scarce resources, there is good cause to limit judicial intervention as the first response to administrative disputes. The major theme of this thesis is to investigate the feasibility of administrative tribunal reform in South Africa, using two other commonwealth countries, Australia and England, as a basis for comparison. Australia and England have been chosen for comparison because they share similar administrative law traditions and they can provide working models of coherent tribunal structures. The Australian tribunal system is well-established and consists of tribunals which fall under the control of the executive, while tribunals in England have recently undergone a significant transformation, and are now part of the independent judiciary. The South African government currently spends, indeed wastes, a significant amount of money on administrative law litigation. Due to the limitations of judicial review, even after the high costs of litigation and the long duration of court proceedings, the results achieved may still be unsatisfactory. Furthermore, judicial review is unsuited to giving effect to systemic administrative change and the improvement of initial decision-making. Australia and England have begun to move away from the traditional court model for the resolution of administrative disputes. Both have indicated a preference for the important role of tribunals in the administration of disputes. Tribunals have been shown to offer the advantage of being speedier, cheaper, more efficient, more participatory and more accessible than traditional courts, which contributes to tribunals being a more available resource for lay people or people without sophisticated legal knowledge, and provides wider access to remedies than courts. The English and Australian models indicate a few important trends which need to be applied universally to ensure a sustained tribunal reform and a system which provides a higher level of administrative redress than the over-burdened and institutionally inept courts currently do. These include co-operation among government departments and tribunals; open and accountable systemic change; the need for supervision and evaluation of the whole of administrative law by an independent and competent body; and ultimately a focus on the needs of users of state services. At the same time, there are arguments against administrative tribunal reform. These include the costs of reform; the ways to establish tribunals; and the level of independence shown by the tribunals. These arguments are especially relevant in the South African context, where the government faces huge social problems and a scarcity of resources. However, after an analysis of the valuable characteristics of tribunals and the role that they serve in the day to day administration of justice, it is difficult to see how these objections to tribunals can outweigh their potential importance in the administrative justice system. The need for sustained systematic reform in South Africa is one that cannot be ignored. Tribunals offer a valuable alternative to judicial review for the resolution of administrative disputes. Furthermore, the tribunal systems of Australia and England demonstrate how the effective creation and continued use of comprehensive tribunal structures contributes firstly to cost reduction and secondly to ease the administrative burden on courts who are not suited to cure large-scale administrative error.
AFRIKAANSE OPSOMMING: In die administratiefreg oefen die regsprekende gesag tradisioneel beheer uit oor die uitvoerende gesag deur middel van geregtelike hersiening. Geregtelike hersiening is egter nie die mees doeltreffende of effektiewe primêre beheermeganisme om sistemiese administratiewe verbetering teweeg te bring nie. In 'n land met die uitdagings van 'transformatiewe konstitusionalisme‘ en skaars hulpbronne, kan 'n goeie argument gevoer word dat geregtelike inmenging as die eerste antwoord op administratiewe dispute beperk moet word. Die deurlopende tema van hierdie tesis is 'n ondersoek na die lewensvatbaarheid van hervorming van administratiewe tribunale in Suid-Afrika, in vergelyking met die posisie in Australië en Engeland, waarvan beide ook, tesame met Suid-Afrika, deel vorm van die Statebond. Hierdie lande is gekies vir regsvergelykende studie aangesien hulle 'n administratiefregtelike tradisie met Suid-Afrika deel en beide werkende modelle van duidelike tribunale strukture daarstel. Die Australiese tribunale stelsel is goed gevestig en bestaan uit tribunale onder die beheer van die uitvoerende gesag, terwyl die tribunale stelsel in Engeland onlangs 'n beduidende hervorming ondergaan het en nou deel van die onafhanklike regsprekende gesag is. Die Suid-Afrikaanse regering mors aansienlike hoeveelhede geld op administratiefregtelike litigasie. Selfs na hoë koste en lang vertragings van litigasie mag die resultate steeds onbevredigend wees as gevolg van die beperkings inherent aan geregtelike hersiening. Tesame met hierdie oorwegings is geregtelike hersiening ook nie gerig op sistemiese administratiewe verandering en verbetering van aanvanklike besluitneming nie. Australië en Engeland het onlangs begin wegbeweeg van die tradisionele hof-gebaseerde model vir die oplossing van administratiewe dispute. Beide toon 'n voorkeur vir die belangrike rol wat tribunale in die administrasie van dispute kan speel Tribunale bied die bewese voordele om vinniger, goedkoper, meer doeltreffend, meer deelnemend en meer toeganklik te wees as tradisionele howe, sodat tribunale 'n meer beskikbare hulpbron is vir leke, oftewel, persone sonder gesofistikeerde regskennis en dus beter toegang tot remedies as tradisionele howe verskaf. Die Engelse en Australiese modelle dui op enkele belangrike tendense wat universeel toegepas moet word om volgehoue tribunale hervorming te verseker en om =n stelsel te skep wat 'n hoër vlak van administratiewe geregtigheid daarstel as wat oorlaaide en institusioneel onbekwame howe kan. Dit verwys bepaald na samewerking tussen staatsdepartemente en tibunale; deursigtige en verantwoordbare sistemiese veranderinge; die behoefte aan toesighouding en evaluasie van die hele administratiefreg deur 'n onafhanklike, bevoegde liggaam; en uiteindelik 'n fokus op die behoeftes van die gebruikers van staatsdienste. Daar is egter terselfdertyd ook argumente teen administratiewe tribunale hervorming. Hierdie argumente sluit in die koste van hervorming; die wyses waarop tribunale gevestig word; en die vlak van onafhanklikheid voorgehou deur tribunale. Hierdie argumente is veral relevant in die Suid-Afrikaanse konteks waar die regering voor groot sosiale probleme te staan kom en daarby ingesluit, 'n tekort aan hulpbronne ook moet hanteer. Daarenteen is dit moeilik om in te sien hoe enige teenkanting en teenargumente met betrekking tot die vestiging van administratiewe tribunale swaarder kan weeg as die potensiële belang van sulke tribunale in die administratiewe geregtigheidstelsel, veral nadat 'n analise van die waardevolle karaktereienskappe van tribunale en die rol wat hulle speel in die dag-tot-dag administrasie van geregtigheid onderneem is. Die behoefte aan volhoubare sistemiese hervorming in Suid-Afrika kan nie geïgnoreer word nie. Tribunale bied 'n waardevolle alternatief tot geregtelike hersiening met die oog op die oplossing van administratiewe dispute. Tesame hiermee demonstreer die tribunale stelsels in Australië en Engeland hoe die doeltreffende vestiging en deurlopende gebruik van omvattende tribunale bydra, eerstens om kostes verbonde aan die oplossing van administratiewe dispute te verlaag en tweedens, om die administratiewe las op die howe, wat nie aangelê is daarvoor om grootskaalse administratiewe foute reg te stel nie, te verlig.
劉丹. "抽象行政行為司法審查理論研究 : 完善我國抽象行政行為司法審查制度 = Theoretical research on the judicial review of abstract administrative act : improve the judicial review system of abstract administrative act in China". Thesis, University of Macau, 2010. http://umaclib3.umac.mo/record=b2179143.
Texto completoMüller, Sophia. "Talking Back: An Examination of Legislative Sequels Produced by the National Assembly of Quebec in Response to Judicial Invalidation of the Charter of the French Language". Thesis, Université d'Ottawa / University of Ottawa, 2017. http://hdl.handle.net/10393/35880.
Texto completoLetteau, Gabrielle Tracey. "A court without resort?: comparative aspects of the "Act of State" doctrine : traditional limitations on thejudiciary's power of review, and its implications for Hong Kong'scourt of final appeals". Thesis, The University of Hong Kong (Pokfulam, Hong Kong), 1996. http://hub.hku.hk/bib/B38627826.
Texto completoXu, Zi Wei. "Legal standing of private parties within judicial reviews in the European Community : the missing piece in a complete system of remedies?" Thesis, University of Macau, 2009. http://umaclib3.umac.mo/record=b2099272.
Texto completoBucci, Eduardo Sadalla. "A análise do controle de constitucionalidade de omissões legislativas pelo Supremo Tribunal Federal na Constituição Federal de 1988". Universidade de São Paulo, 2016. http://www.teses.usp.br/teses/disponiveis/2/2134/tde-05022018-075138/.
Texto completoThis dissertation is presented as partial requirement for obtaining the degree of Master in Law in concentration area of state law under the guidance of Prof. Dr. José Levi do Amaral Mello Júnior, has the theme analysis of judicial review of legislative omissions by the Supreme Court on Federal Constitution of 1988. The definition of the empirical research is related to the judgements of Supreme Court in judicial review, abstract or factual, of legislative omissions from 5 October 1988 to 18 December 2015. Hereupon, under this analysis obtained the jurisprudential definition of legislative omissions, which is not exactly coincident with the externalised definition by the doctrine. Ultimately, considering the method analysed, was consigned critical conclusion defining the need of legislative changing thus the omissions decided by the Supreme Court, aware the National Congress, are carried out with a deadline for warping under penalty of locking out the trial.
Sousa, Luís Alberto Miranda Garcia de. "Controle de constitucionalidade e interpretação razoável da Constituição: Uma investigação em torno dos efeitos do princípio democrático sobre a partilha da autoridade interpretativa final da Constituição". Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, 2010. http://www.bdtd.uerj.br/tde_busca/arquivo.php?codArquivo=1748.
Texto completoThis work is an inquiry about the legitimacy of judicial review of legislation under the democratic principle. The basic question this study purports to answer is this: taking into consideration the fact of pluralism, the existence of reasonable disagreements among people, and the open texture of constitutional law, in which situations are constitutional courts authorized to substitute their own constitutional interpretation for the interpretation chosen by the legislative body in the lawmaking process? The proposed answer to this question is given in two parts. First, we present some arguments to justify judicial review of legislation in a limited fashion. Second, we suggest a decision-making method (applicable specifically to judicial review of legislation) that is designed to ensure the optimization of democratic principle.
Mello, Cristiana De Santis Mendes de Farias. "O revigoramento do poder legislativo: uma agenda para o século XXI". Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, 2011. http://www.bdtd.uerj.br/tde_busca/arquivo.php?codArquivo=4883.
Texto completoThe Legislative Branch is vital to collective self-government and to restrain power. It is necessary to reinvigorate it. This dissertation brings proposals to increase the legitimacy of the Legislative Branch that are independent from the political reform. The first proposal consists in correcting some practices that compromise the performance of the Legislative, which are, the lack of appreciation of veto, the current form of budget preparation and execution, the excessive power of the leaders and the limited jurisdictional review of the due process of law. The second proposal aims at the strengthening of the committees, which are arenas more adequate than the Plenary to develop the deliberative potential of the Parliament. These fractional organs can use the impact assessment, which is a tool intended to improve legislation. The third proposal corresponds to the regulation of lobbying. The institutionalization of this activity is essential to imprint transparency to the process so as to allow control and to minimize the imbalance in access to decision makers.
Roters, Dominik. "Die gebotene Kontrolldichte bei der gerichtlichen Prüfung der Richtlinien des Bundesausschusses der Ärzte und Krankenkassen /". Frankfurt am Main ; New York : Lang, 2003. http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&doc_number=010170251&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA.
Texto completoTávora, Rodrigo de Almeida. "Modulação temporal de efeitos: uma abordagem dogmática e dialógica". Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, 2012. http://www.bdtd.uerj.br/tde_busca/arquivo.php?codArquivo=5294.
Texto completoThis essay intends to enlarge the dogmatic approach concerning to the prospective effect of the decision which recognizes the unconstitutionality of the normative acts. The essay also addresses the prospectivity doctrine to the legality control and other acts - not regulatory - performed by the three branches. Besides addressing the theoretical assumptions underlying the prospective approach, it analyzes the judicial review system and the different schemes given to invalidity situations. It allows a new investigation about the theme in order to conduct the prospective effect to the balance between the constitutional principles violated by the rule that it wants to declare invalid and the principles which protect the legal relationships formed during the term of the rule declared invalid. The essay also addresses the subject in Brazil, showing that the prospective approach is not limited only by the standards formally established in law. Finally, the essay presents the prospective effect as a valuable tool for institutional dialogue, which may allow the reconciliation of the branches own spaces, tempering any judicial activism. The prospective effect works as a bridge between the empirical and normative theories. It takes into account consequentialist and institutional approaches without neglecting the normative and dogmatic concerns. At the same time, it allows the most intense debate and dialogue among the branches, ensuring the constitutional provisions in a more harmonious and systematic way.
Tassaneesrivong, Varanya. "Les actes de l'Exécutif en Thaïlande". Thesis, Aix-Marseille, 2014. http://www.theses.fr/2014AIXM1008.
Texto completoWhat are acts of Executive in Thailand? Are they different from acts of Executive in France? How are the acts of government (acte de gouvernement) different from government's act (acte du gouvernement)? Are they administrative acts? What is the scope of judicial review of those acts? What is the effect in Thailand of a parallel and sometimes competing jurisdiction of the Administrative Court and the Constitutional Court? These are some of the questions that this thesis in a thorough judicial and administrative review in order to provide an answer in a clear and concise order due to the recent political events
Madebwe, Tinashe Masvimbo. "Assessing the duty to exhaust internal remedies in the South African law". Thesis, Rhodes University, 2007. http://hdl.handle.net/10962/d1007253.
Texto completoBacon, Rachel. "Amalgamating tribunals: a recipe for optimal reform". Thesis, The University of Sydney, 2004. http://hdl.handle.net/2123/621.
Texto completoBacon, Rachel. "Amalgamating tribunals a recipe for optimal reform /". University of Sydney. Law, 2004. http://hdl.handle.net/2123/621.
Texto completoMichel, Audrey. "Le recours au mode de preuve scientifique dans le contentieux constitutionnel des droits et libertés : recherche comparée sur les méthodes des juges américain et canadien". Thesis, Aix-Marseille, 2017. http://www.theses.fr/2017AIXM0053/document.
Texto completoIn 1908, the U.S. Supreme Court Justices made several citations of medical, sociology andpsychology studies for the first time. Since then, the use of scientific evidence has expanded and it became an important part of the work of the Supreme Court of the U.S. as well as the Supreme Court of Canada. Scientific evidence is an essential tool to inform judges in constitutional rights cases. It gives information on social realities and technical questions which are directly relevant to resolve questions of law. However, the use of scientific evidence is more than a medium of information. Indeed, it implies an interest for facts that go beyond the parties. Constitutional doctrine itself implies empirical questions that could find answers in scientific evidence. By determining those facts, scientific evidence becomes a part of the constitutional doctrineitself. Consequently, the use of scientific evidence interrogates on the nature of judicial review and on the judge’s methods. Thought judges in the U.S. and in Canada frequently cite scientific evidence, their use is mostly unregulated and indeterminate. The uncertainties surrounding the use of scientific evidence concern procedural questions as well as questions regarding their role in decisionmaking. Those questions must be answered. Once resolved, we research a methodological framework in which scientific evidence could be used consistently by American and Canadian judges. This approach is essential to reassert the value of scientific evidence in constitutionalrights cases and to improve constitutional rights protection. Finally, this framework might be relevant for judges beyond the United States and Canada
Blero, Bernard. "Du droit objectif aux droits politiques des administrés: essai sur la répartition des compétences entre le juge judiciaire et le juge de l'excès de pouvoir". Doctoral thesis, Universite Libre de Bruxelles, 1998. http://hdl.handle.net/2013/ULB-DIPOT:oai:dipot.ulb.ac.be:2013/212095.
Texto completoAmédro, Jean-François. "Le juge administratif et la séparation des Eglises et de l'Etat sous la IIIe République : un exemple des interactions entre les institutions républicaines et le contrôle juridictionnel de l'administration". Thesis, Paris 2, 2011. http://www.theses.fr/2011PA020010/document.
Texto completoLaw scolars are traditionnally interested in the implementation of the separation of church and state by the administrative courts during the Third Republic. However, a renewal of the classic understanding was possible. While classic studies focus on the contribution of the Conseil d’Etat to the success of the Séparation and the protection of freedom of thought and religion, it is conceivable to study administrative case law from the angle of interactions between republican institutions and judicial review of administration. This methodological framework allows to underline mutual influences between the judiciary and republican institutions in the history of the administrative jurisdiction. Thus, as the Séparation is concerned, case law has played a strategic part in the implementation and enrichment of the principles established by the 9 december 1905 Act, therefore contributing to provide substance to the legal concept of laïcité de l’Etat. In the same time, and especially concerning the case law relating to the administrative regulation of expressions of religious beliefs in the public space, the political and legal context of the Séparation has had a decisive influence on the construction of the republican recours pour excès de pouvoir. This contribution consisted in a modernization of the judicial review techniques and a more accurate control of discretionary powers of the administrative authority. Through the study of the two main aspects of administrative case law relating to the Séparation, this research would like to enlighten the transformation of the traditional imperial-type administrative jurisdiction into a democratic and republican one
Lestrade, Éric. "Les principes directeurs du procès dans la jurisprudence du Conseil Constitutionnel". Thesis, Bordeaux 4, 2013. http://www.theses.fr/2013BOR40033/document.
Texto completoIn spite of a relatively low number of written dispositions dedicated to justice inside of the body of the Constitution of October 1958 4th, the constitutional Council, while updating this text through the Declaration of Human Rights, contributed to the development of a procedural constitutional law, which is structured around guiding principles. Those principles can be classified within three different categories : two major categories depend on the trial actor that is primarily concerned, either the judge or the parties; a third and additional category pertaining to procedural protections, fosters the essential qualities of the judge and secure the protection of the parties’ rights. A gradation of the requirements of the constitutional Council is discreetly perceptible between the first two categories of principles, and more easily identifiable between those first two categories and the last one. This decreasing scale of “density” yoked to the trial guiding principles highlights a genuine judicial policy when it comes to procedural constitutional law, emphasizing access to the judge, whom is given essential qualities in order to achieve its judicial duty. However, the action of the French constitutional judge, as satisfactory as it is towards the rights of the trial, would easily support the intervention of the constituent power in order to update Justice’s constitutional status
Dony, Marianne. "La responsabilité des pouvoirs publics en cas d'intervention dans une entreprise en difficulté". Doctoral thesis, Universite Libre de Bruxelles, 1990. http://hdl.handle.net/2013/ULB-DIPOT:oai:dipot.ulb.ac.be:2013/213118.
Texto completoRamaite, Mashau Silas. "The role of the judiciary in a modern state with a tradition of legislative supremacy". Thesis, 1996. http://hdl.handle.net/10500/15854.
Texto completoConstitutional International and Indigenous Law
LL.D.
Huang, Kwo-yih y 黃國益. "Legislative Discreation and Judicial Review". Thesis, 1999. http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/48449380228398817816.
Texto completoHsieh, Ming Yu y 謝明祐. "Judicial Review on the Legislative Facts". Thesis, 2012. http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/80666475874483353559.
Texto completoHua, Wu Jen y 吳仁華. "Judicial Review on the legislative purposes based on the J.Y.Interpretations". Thesis, 2011. http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/26544252744839889403.
Texto completoHsiang, Cheng-Hua y 項程華. "The Judicial Review and Legislative Self-discipline Studies in The Constitution of R.O.C". Thesis, 1997. http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/50258439465239776958.
Texto completo國立政治大學
中山人文社科研究所
86
The question to the judicial power is in the view to democratic legitimacy, the analysis from the basic difference between "classic democracy" and "reformed democracy theory". there are many challenges to the assumptions ofthe "classic democracy theory", which beyond human common experience. Most ofthe political scientist are able to accept "reformed democracy theory". If the power of judicial review is basis on people consent and changed by most of the people anytime, the power of judicial review is owned democratic legitimacyIn the functional approach of constitution explanation which should make thejudicial power into legislative discipline area.
Cartier, Genevieve. "Reconceiving discretion : from discretion as power to discretion as dialogue /". 2004. http://link.library.utoronto.ca/eir/EIRdetail.cfm?Resources__ID=94566&T=F.
Texto completoBar-Siman-Tov, Ittai. "Separating Law-Making from Sausage-Making: The Case for Judicial Review of the Legislative Process". Thesis, 2011. https://doi.org/10.7916/D8HM5GMN.
Texto completoHUANG, CHU-TING y 黃楚婷. "A Reflection and Redefinition of Legislative Discretion Based on the Critique of Standards of Judicial Review". Thesis, 2015. http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/93dd42.
Texto completo東吳大學
法律學系
103
Instead of being the term in positive law, “legislative discretion” is the gradually developed conception to prevent the policy-making competence of legislators from judicial review. Generally, “legislative discretion” refers to that legislators can autonomously decide on “whether”, “when” and “how” to make laws and regulations. The discussion of the conception is especially meaningful in judicial review, because the ability to make its own decisions of legislator is not refers to unscrupulousness or exempting from judicial review, instead, man can only make sure the legislative discretion by limiting “the involving degree” of judicial review. The discussion of “legislative discretion” is frequently connected to “standards of judicial review”, that means, legislative discretion is often specified by standards of judicial review. Therefore, legislative discretion involves in principle of democracy and the separation of powers, which dividing the legislative power and the judicial power. It seems to be undoubtedly that the extent of legislative power should correspond to standards of judicial review; however, it is not an easy job in judicial practice. Take Taiwan for instance, legislative discretion has little to do with standards of judicial review when the term mentioned in our judicial interpretations. Actually, the significance of legislative discretion is not only check-and-balance between the legislative power and the judicial power, but pointing out the relevance of legislators and Constitution. Owning Legislative discretion, legislators can fully consider different interests to guarantee the liberty and fundamental rights of the most of people. If judicial review cannot clarify the conception of legislative discretion, judicial self-restraint will easily become unscrupulousness on one hand; legislators’ significance in constitutional practice will be reduced on the other hand. This study argues that the significance of legislative discretion is same as judicial review, which can protect fundamental rights positively. Legislative discretion would be oversimplified if we only regard it as the limit of judicial power. If this conception is a complicated issue which involved in principle of democracy and the separation of powers, we must figure out what kind of understanding will be an good approach to well protect human rights. As a result, this study tries to redefine legislative discretion in the viewpoint of “legislative process”, and uses the model of “behavior control” in judicial review, and takes it as an approach to ensuring legislative discretion. In the text of this study, “behavior control” should not be regarded as stricter judicial review, though the examination on legislative process done by constitutional court should be emphasized. Legislative discretion, which is legislators’ policy-making space preserved by Constitution, shall not being protected by exempting from judicial review. The only way to respect the result of compromise of different interests in society, is that constitutional court must takes the process of compromise, legislative process, seriously.
Chang, Ya-Fei y 張雅菲. "Legislative Control of Post-award Procedural Dynamics: Modeling Judicial Behaviors of Post-award Review Systems in International Commercial Arbitration". Thesis, 2016. http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/31421564937045806358.
Texto completo國立臺灣大學
科際整合法律學研究所
104
Ensuring the international enforceability of arbitral awards is an ideal research topic for international commercial arbitration. Constructing national legislative control of post-award procedural dynamics in domestic or international commercial arbitration is the initial conditions of modeling post-award judicial review systems. Building up theories for the national or uniform legislative modeling depends on how the judicial behaviors evolve in post-award review systems. Hence, apart from typical scenarios of legal studies, this thesis applied the legislative modeling as the approach to study the stability of international post-award review systems. The purpose of this thesis is to study the theories-building basis of constructing international enforceable awards. Three research approaches include comparative legal studies, evolutionary dynamics, mathematical modeling. Legislative modeling is based on these approaches for controlling the post-award procedural dynamics, predicting the sustainability of national arbitration laws, analyzing the grounds for international post-award review systems. Firstly, this thesis studied the strategic behaviors in dispute resolution bargaining processes and analyzed the distribution of power in multilateral dispute resolution procedures. Secondly, this thesis modelled the judicial behaviors in evolutionary multilevel hierarchy of orders based on the heuristics decision-makings with the preferences of social agents. Thirdly, this thesis schemed procedural delocalized arbitrations for the national legislative management of arbitration laws. Finally, this thesis explored the theoretical grounds for constructing the international legislative control of post-award review systems. The contributions of this thesis include filling the gaps of traditional research methodologies and interdisciplinary legislative modeling and building three models for finding the equilibria of interests in post-award bargaining processes, showing that the intensity of the vacatur grounds for foreign arbitral awards made great impacts on post-award procedural dynamics, studying the influence of the political control in international post-award review systems. This thesis concluded that finding the preferences of contracts and the strategic equilibria of the parties improved the efficacy of settlement bargaining; for studying the sustainability of national arbitration laws, analyzing the long-term behaviors of post-award review systems was helpful; constructing the international legislative control of post-award review systems was based on the functions of the transnational political agents and the non-state actors. This thesis suggested to ratify the New York Convention and to add the grounds for modifications or corrections on the evident material miscalculation or mistakes and reinterpretations of arbitral awards in Taiwan Arbitration Law.
Krikorian, Jacqueline D. "Judicial review beyond state borders? The impact of the WTO dispute settlement mechanism on legislative and policy arrangements in Canada and the United States". 2004. http://link.library.utoronto.ca/eir/EIRdetail.cfm?Resources__ID=94583&T=F.
Texto completoMartins, Patrícia Fragoso. "Rethinking access by private parties to the Court of Justice of the European Union : judicial review of union acts before and after the Lisbon Treaty". Doctoral thesis, 2012. http://hdl.handle.net/10400.14/12686.
Texto completoA presente dissertação, que tem por objeto o acesso dos particulares ao Tribunal de Justiça da União Europeia (TJUE) — um tema clássico de Direito da União Europeia — assenta em duas decisões fundamentais proferidas pelo TJUE, em 1986, nos casos Les Verts e Johnston. Considera-se aqui que a “ponte” entre os dois referidos acórdãos não foi totalmente estabelecida na jurisprudência do TJUE, abrindo espaço para incertezas, equívocos e insuficiências no que diz respeito à tutela jurisdicional dos particulares na União Europeia. À luz do acórdão Les Verts, a dissertação começa por considerar que a jurisprudência do TJUE adota uma abordagem objetivista, institucional e sistémica que tem dado origem a lacunas na proteção jurisdicional dos particulares, e justifica a incapacidade do mesmo tribunal no suprimento das referidas lacunas. Neste contexto, chama-se a atenção para (i) a interpretação restritiva das condições em que aos particulares é permitido intentar uma ação de anulação; (ii) a irrelevância do argumento fundado na violação do direito fundamental à tutela jurisdicional efetiva na apreciação da admissibilidade de ações de anulação; (iii) a abordagem generosa que o TJUE tem adotado relativamente a outras dimensões objetivistas e institucionais do sistema de controlo jurisdicional da validade de atos da União; e (iv) as preocupações sistémicas relativas ao controlo do volume de processos que o TJUE tem de decidir, associadas a uma certa visão da arquitetura judiciária europeia, considerada fundamentalmente ancorada nas jurisdições nacionais. A acrescer a estas considerações, chama-se ainda a atenção para o facto de os meios de tutela alternativos ao acesso direto dos particulares aos tribunais da União se demonstrarem inadequados e ineficazes, precisamente em virtude da abordagem objetivista, institucional e sistémica que subjaz à jurisprudência do TJUE no que diz respeito ao âmbito e à natureza jurídica dos referidos meios de tutela. A este propósito, a dissertação discute, em particular, o princípio da autonomia processual dos Estados-membros, a natureza jurídica do mecanismo do reenvio prejudicial e o sentido e alcance da doutrina TWD. Acrescenta-se ainda que a jurisprudência do TJUE relativamente ao controlo jurisdicional da validade de atos da União no domínio dos chamados “pilares intergovernamentais” sugere igualmente uma tendência objetivista e institucional. Salientando os elementos objetivos, a preferência institucional e a visão sistémica que decorrem da jurisprudência do TJUE nesta matéria, a dissertação chama à colação a figura das garantias institucionais, enquanto reflexo da dimensão objetiva dos direitos fundamentais. Rompendo com a abordagem anterior, considera-se então que a entrada em vigor do Tratado de Lisboa impõe que o TJUE adote uma orientação dita subjetivista relativamente à tutela jurisdicional dos particulares na União Europeia. Esta nova abordagem funda-se em primeira linha no acórdão Johnston que lançou a primeira pedra nesta matéria na ordem jurídica da União. Na verdade, o novo artigo 6.º do Tratado da União Europeia implica uma mudança de paradigma constitucional no que diz respeito à proteção dos direitos fundamentais na União Europeia. Neste contexto, a dissertação discute o impacto processual da constitucionalização formal da Carta dos Direitos Fundamentais da União, e bem assim da adesão à Convenção Europeia dos Direitos do Homem. À luz da referida mudança de paradigma constitucional, analisam-se as alterações introduzidas pelo Tratado de Lisboa no que respeita ao controlo da validade de atos da União por iniciativa dos particulares. A este propósito, tomando em consideração a recente decisão do Tribunal Geral no caso Inuit, a dissertação propõe diversas soluções relativas à interpretação dos artigos 19.º do Tratado da União Europeia e 263.º § 4 e 275.º do Tratado relativo ao Funcionamento da União Europeia à luz do princípio pro actore que deverá alegadamente orientar a jurisprudência do TJUE nestas matérias. Por último, é discutida a questão do alargamento do acesso dos particulares ao TJUE tendo em conta as preocupações veiculadas pelo tribunal relativamente ao aumento do volume de processos que pode ameaçar comprometer o adequado funcionamento do sistema judicial da União. Aqui, analisa-se a possibilidade de criação de um mecanismo europeu de certiorari, juntamente com outras reformas jurisdicionais que têm sido objeto de debate e reflexão na comunidade jurídica.
Nemakwarani, Lamson Nditsheni. "The judicial interpretation of administrative justice with specific reference to Roman v Williams 1997(2) SACR 754(C)". Diss., 2000. http://hdl.handle.net/10500/15612.
Texto completoAdministrative Law
LL.M. (Administrative Law)
Radmilovic, Vuk. "Between Activism and Restraint: Institutional Legitimacy, Strategic Decision Making and the Supreme Court of Canada". Thesis, 2011. http://hdl.handle.net/1807/31908.
Texto completoMhango, Mtendeweka Owen. "Separation of powers and the political question doctrine in South Africa : a comparative analysis". Thesis, 2018. http://hdl.handle.net/10500/24238.
Texto completoPublic, Constitutional and International Law
LL. D.
Bimpong-Buta, S. Y. 1940. "The role of the Supreme Court in the development of constitutional law in Ghana". Thesis, 2005. http://hdl.handle.net/10500/2386.
Texto completoJurisprudence
LL.D.