Literatura académica sobre el tema "Intraoperative RV assessment"

Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is a disease of the pulmonary vasculature that is characterized by a progressive increase in pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) and pulmonary artery pressure (PAP) resulting in the development of right ventricular (RV) failure, inadequate oxygenation, and ultimately death. Anesthesia and surgery, both cardiac and noncardiac, are associated with significantly increased morbidity and mortality in patients with PAH due mainly to RV failure, arrhythmias, postoperative hypoxemia, and myocardial ischemia. Preoperative risk assessment and successful management of patients with PAH undergoing general surgery involves an understanding of the pathophysiology of the disease, analysis of preoperative and operative risk factors, intraoperative management, and early recognition and treatment of postoperative complications.

Pulmonary artery hypertension (PAH) that occurs as a consequence of portal hypertension is termed portopulmonary hypertension (POPH) and is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Among liver transplant (LT) candidates, reported incidence rates of POPH range from 4.5% to 8.5%. The severity of POPH is unrelated to the severity of portal hypertension or the liver disease. In LT patients, intraoperative death and immediate post-LT mortality are feared clinical events when transplantation is attempted in the setting of untreated, moderate to severe POPH. Specific pulmonary artery vasodilator medications (PAH-specific therapy) appear effective in reducing pulmonary artery pressures, improving right ventricular (RV) function and survival. Thus, screening for and accurately diagnosing POPH prior to LT has become a standard of care. The post-LT course of patients with moderate POPH is unpredictable, but most patients can be weaned from PAH-specific therapy over time. In this article, we present an overview of the preoperative assessment of POPH with an emphasis on risk assessment for transplant and the most recent medical treatment options.

Background: The incidence of rheumatic fever and rheumatic heart disease still remains high in the developing countries. Mitral stenosis is predominantly due to rheumatic origin and affects females more than males. Historically, closed mitral valvotomy (CMV) was the first effective intervention for mitral stenosis. We studied the immediate and early surgical outcomes of MVR in patients with history of CMV to see whether their disease behaves differently, when compared with patients without prior CMV undergoing MVR. Methods: This single center retrospective cohort study was conducted in Sree Chitra Tirunal Institute for Medical Sciences and Technology, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, India. Patients who underwent MVR from January 2008 to December 2012 at our institute were studied. The hospital records of 90 patients were analyzed both in the CMV cohort and also in the non-CMV cohort. Preoperative details, intraoperative parameters, immediate postsurgery echocardiography parameters, and follow-up echocardiography details at 1 year and 5 years were studied. Results: Both the cohorts were similar in age, height, weight, and BSA. In the CMV cohort, 67% were females and in the non-CMV cohort 48% were females. Most of the patients in both the cohorts presented with functional classes 2 and 3. The mean duration between onset of symptoms and MVR in the CMV cohort and the non-CMV cohort was 24.6 years and 6.25 years, respectively. Fifty-nine patients in the CMV cohort had preoperative atrial fibrillation, whereas 47 patients in the non-CMV cohort presented with atrial fibrillation. The mean left atrial (LA) size of patients with sinus rhythm and atrial fibrillation was 46.34 (SE, 0.852) and 55.21(SE, 0.808), respectively. Preoperative echocardiographic assessment revealed a mean ejection fraction of 62% and 63%, mean mitral stenosis gradient of 13 mm Hg and 14.7 mm Hg, mean LA size of 53.2 mm and 50.5 mm, and mean right ventricular systolic pressure of 47.5 mm Hg and 43.6 mm Hg in the post-CMV cohort and in the non-CMV cohort, respectively. The CMV cohort had a longer cardiopulmonary bypass time (111.5 minutes) in comparison with the non-CMV cohort (97 minutes). The aortic cross-clamp time remained similar in both the cohorts. Thirty-six percent of the post-CMV cohort patients had a valve size of 25, and 48% of patients belonging to the non-CMV cohort had a valve size of 27. The percent of moderate-to-severe subvalvar pathology was 88 in both the cohorts. Patients belonging to the post-CMV cohort had a median ventilation time of 16.35 hours, and the patients of the non-CMV cohort had a median ventilation time of 13.75 hours. The duration of ICU stay was 4.41 (SE, 0.188) days and 4.13 (SE, 0.153) days, and length of hospital stay was 8.93 (SE, 0.230) days and 9.13 (SE, 0.313) days in the CMV and the non-CMV cohorts, respectively. Inotropic requirement, measured by the vasoactive inotropic score, was higher in the post-CMV group (11.9), when compared to the other cohort (9.7). Right ventricular (RV) function and pulmonary arterial hypertension assessed in the immediate postoperative period, at 1 year, and at 5 years did not show any significant difference. Conclusion: The percentage of females in the CMV cohort is higher. Delaying the valve replacement by performing a surgical palliative procedure like CMV, is beneficial in female patients in the child-bearing age group so that they can complete the families. The disease process started earlier in the CMV cohort, and they had a longer duration of illness before undergoing MVR. Even with the longer duration of disease, the RV function, LA size, PA pressures, and mitral stenosis gradients were comparable. Therefore, CMV prevented progression of the disease in the CMV group. The mean LA size is significantly higher in patients with atrial fibrillation. The CMV cohort had a longer cardiopulmonary bypass time. The duration of ventilation, ICU stay, and hospital stay were similar in both cohorts. Inotrope requirement was higher in the post-CMV group. RV function and pulmonary arterial hypertension assessed in the immediate postoperative period, at 1 year, and at 5 years did not show any significant difference.

BackgroundThe assessment of right ventricular (RV) function in patients undergoing elective cardiac surgery is paramount for providing optimal perioperative care. The role of regional RV function assessment employing sophisticated state-of-the-art cardiac imaging modalities has not been investigated in this cohort. Hence, this study investigated the association of 3D echocardiography-based regional RV volumetry with short-term outcomes.Materials and MethodsIn a retrospective single-center study, patients undergoing elective cardiac surgery were included if they underwent 3D transesophageal echocardiography prior to thoracotomy. A dedicated software quantified regional RV volumes of the inflow tract, apical body and RV outflow tract employing meshes derived from 3D speckle-tracking. Echocardiographic, clinical and laboratory data were entered into univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses to determine association with the endpoint (in-hospital mortality or the need for extracorporeal circulatory support).ResultsOut of 357 included patients, 25 (7%) reached the endpoint. Inflow RV ejection fraction (RVEF, 32 ± 8% vs. 37 ± 11%, p = 0.01) and relative stroke volume (rel. SV) were significantly lower in patients who reached the endpoint (44 ± 8 vs. 48 ± 9%, p = 0.02), while the rel. SV of the apex was higher (38 ± 10% vs. 33 ± 8%, p = 0.01). Global left and right ventricular function including RVEF and left ventricular global longitudinal strain did not differ. In univariable logistic regression, tricuspid regurgitation grade ≥ 2 [odds ratio (OR) 4.24 (1.66–10.84), p < 0.01], inflow RVEF [OR 0.95 (0.92–0.99), p = 0.01], inflow rel. SV [OR 0.94 (0.90–0.99), p = 0.02], apex rel. SV [OR 1.07 (1.02–1.13), p < 0.01] and apex to inflow rel. SV ratio [OR 5.81 (1.90–17.77), p < 0.01] were significantly associated with the endpoint. In a multivariable model, only the presence of tricuspid regurgitation [OR 4.24 (1.66–10.84), p < 0.01] and apex to inflow rel. SV ratio [OR 6.55 (2.09–20.60), p < 0.001] were independently associated with the endpoint.ConclusionsRegional RV function is associated with short-term outcomes in patients undergoing elective cardiac surgery and might be helpful for optimizing risk stratification.

ObjectiveThe aim was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of TTVR in patients with severe TR at the 1-year follow-up.Materials and methodsThis project was a single-center, observational study. From September 2020 to May 2021, 15 patients with severe or extremely severe TR at high risk of traditional surgery were enrolled. All patients had preoperative imaging assessments to evaluate the tricuspid valve and the anatomy of the right heart. All patients were planned to treated with the LuX-Valve (Ningbo Jenscare Biotechnology, Ningbo, China). The LuX-Valve was implanted under the intraoperative guidance of TEE and X-ray fluoroscopy. Data were collected at baseline, before discharge, and at 30 days, 6 months, and 1 year postoperatively.ResultsThe LuX-Valves were successfully implanted in all 15 patients. TR was significantly reduced to ≤ 2 +. One patient died on postoperative day 12 of a pulmonary infection that was considered unrelated to the procedures or the devices. The remaining 14 patients (100.0%) reached the primary end point. One patient (7.1%) was rehospitalized during 1-year follow-up because of device thrombosis. The number of patients who survived at 1 year with New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class II was higher than that before TTVR (11/14 vs. 0/15, P = 9.11 × 10–4). Patients with peripheral edema and ascites decreased from 100.0 to 46.7% at baseline to 28.6% and 14.3% at 1 year (P = 1.57 × 10–3 and 2.53 × 10–2).ConclusionTTVR is associated with RV remodeling, increased cardiac output, and improvement in NYHA functional class. Using the LuX-Valve for TTVR to treat patients with severe TR is a feasible and relatively safe method with reliable clinical results. Further studies are needed to determine long-term outcomes.

Introduction: The technological development of the last 20 years pledges the intensity of efforts for implementing novel imaging contactless modalities that accelerate the translation from the research bench to the patient bedside, especially in the cardiac field. In this work, a novel intraoperative cardiac imaging approach, named Video Kinematic Evaluation (Vi.Ki.E.), is presented and explained in detail. This technology is able to monitor, contactless, the cardiac mechanics and deformation in-situ during heart surgery. Cardiac kinematics have been deeply evaluated ranging from the experimental animal approach to the human myocardial pathologies in both left and right ventricles. Methods: Vi.Ki.E. can be defined “as simple as innovative”. It only consists of a high-speed camera placed upon an exposed beating heart in-situ to record cardiac cycles. Afterwards a tracker software is used on the recorded video to follow the epicardial tissue movements. This tracker provides information about trajectories of the epicardium and, thanks to a custom-made algorithm, the technology supplies heart mechanical information such as: Force of contraction or cardiac fatigue, Energy expenditure, Contraction velocity, displacement of the marker and epicardial torsion. This approach has been tested on 21 rats (9 ischemia/reperfusion and/or for validation, 12 for the gender difference study) and on 37 patients who underwent different surgery between 2015 and 2019. In detail 10 patients underwent Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting, 12 underwent Valve Replacement after Tetralogy of Fallot correction surgery, 6 implanted a Left Ventricular Assist Device (1 is moved in the case study section), 6 patients with Hypoplastic Heart Syndrome underwent GLENN or FONTAN surgery, 2 patients underwent Heart Transplantation and finally 1 patient underwent double valve replacement (this patient is moved into case study section). Results: The patients’ results demonstrated that the Vi.Ki.E. technology was able to discriminate, with statistic potency, the kinematic differences before and after the surgery in real-time, suggesting possible clinical implications in the treatment of the patients before the chest closure and/or in the intensive care unit. As it concerns the experimental animals, the results are the basics of the validation technology. Some of them were used as accepted model in comparison with the Vi.Ki.E. results on patients. Conclusions: In conclusion, this study has shown that Vi.Ki.E. is a safe and contactless technology with promising possible clinical application. The ease in the evaluation and the algorithm-based approach makes Video Kinematic Evaluation a widespread technique from cellular level to human cases covering the entire experimental field with in-vivo evaluation and possibly Langendorff/Working Heart approaches.