Literatura académica sobre el tema "GOVERNMENT OPINION"
Crea una cita precisa en los estilos APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard y otros
Consulte las listas temáticas de artículos, libros, tesis, actas de conferencias y otras fuentes académicas sobre el tema "GOVERNMENT OPINION".
Junto a cada fuente en la lista de referencias hay un botón "Agregar a la bibliografía". Pulsa este botón, y generaremos automáticamente la referencia bibliográfica para la obra elegida en el estilo de cita que necesites: APA, MLA, Harvard, Vancouver, Chicago, etc.
También puede descargar el texto completo de la publicación académica en formato pdf y leer en línea su resumen siempre que esté disponible en los metadatos.
Artículos de revistas sobre el tema "GOVERNMENT OPINION"
Panggabean, Fitri Yani. "KINERJA LAPORAN KEUANGAN PEMERINTAH DAERAH KABUPATEN DAN KOTA DI SUMATERA UTARA BERDASARKAN OPINI AUDIT". JURNAL AKUNTANSI DAN BISNIS : Jurnal Program Studi Akuntansi 5, n.º 2 (29 de noviembre de 2019): 151. http://dx.doi.org/10.31289/jab.v5i2.2692.
Texto completoDharma, Fitra. "Financial accountability on local government and regional economic growth". JPPI (Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Indonesia) 8, n.º 3 (30 de septiembre de 2022): 632. http://dx.doi.org/10.29210/020221472.
Texto completoKahar, A., A. C. Furqan y T. Tenripada. "The Effect of Budget, Audit and Government Performance: Empirical Evidence from Indonesian Regional Governments". Economy of Regions 19, n.º 1 (2023): 289–98. http://dx.doi.org/10.17059/ekon.reg.2023-1-22.
Texto completoSalsabila, Raihania y Ickhsanto Wahyudi. "PENGARUH TEMUAN AUDIT, REKOMENDASI HASIL PEMERIKSAAN, DAN UKURAN PEMERINTAHAN DAERAH TERHADAP OPINI AUDIT PADA PEMERINTAH DAERAH DI INDONESIA". AKSELERASI: Jurnal Ilmiah Nasional 4, n.º 1 (23 de marzo de 2022): 38–45. http://dx.doi.org/10.54783/jin.v4i1.515.
Texto completoNurhayati, Netty, Fahmi Rizani y Kadir. "PERBANDINGAN KINERJA PEMERINTAH DAERAH DI INDONESIA". InFestasi 15, n.º 1 (2 de julio de 2019): 67. http://dx.doi.org/10.21107/infestasi.v15i1.5484.
Texto completoMainingrum, Rena, Sylvia Sjarlis, Andi Ririn Oktaviani y Reno Fithri Meuthia. "The Effect of Audit Findings, Follow-Up Audit Recommendations, And BPK Opinions from The Previous Year on The Determination of Opinions in Local Government Financial Statements". Economics, Business, Accounting & Society Review 2, n.º 1 (10 de mayo de 2023): 58–73. http://dx.doi.org/10.55980/ebasr.v2i1.56.
Texto completoWang, Shuning. "Research on Problems and Countermeasures of Government Response to Online Public Opinion in the Era of Self-Media". SHS Web of Conferences 148 (2022): 03007. http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202214803007.
Texto completoKuschick Ramos, Murilo. "Government, poverty and public opinion". Gestión y Estrategia 08 (1 de julio de 1995): 61–66. http://dx.doi.org/10.24275/uam/azc/dcsh/gye/1995n08/kuschick.
Texto completoPutri, Errina Aprilia, Sri Rahayu y Tri Utami Lestari. "Opini Audit, Dana Perimbangan, Kondisi Keuangan dan Pengungkapan Informasi Keuangan Pemerintah Daerah". E-Jurnal Akuntansi 32, n.º 8 (26 de agosto de 2022): 2132. http://dx.doi.org/10.24843/eja.2022.v32.i08.p13.
Texto completoDadasheva, Akida Abduzhabbarovna. "PUBLIC OPINION AND GOVERNMENT EVALUATION IN NEW UZBEKISTAN". American Journal of Interdisciplinary Innovations Research 04, n.º 01 (1 de enero de 2022): 16–19. http://dx.doi.org/10.37547/tajiir/volume04issue01-04.
Texto completoTesis sobre el tema "GOVERNMENT OPINION"
Downey, Keith Michael. "What factors impact public opinion on federal government spending?" Connect to Electronic Thesis (CONTENTdm), 2009. http://worldcat.org/oclc/449219919/viewonline.
Texto completoJin, Shuai. "Politics of economic inequality in China: government propaganda and public opinion". Diss., University of Iowa, 2017. https://ir.uiowa.edu/etd/5785.
Texto completoDudas, Andrew M. "THE USE OF COMMUNITY OPINION SURVEYS IN LOCAL GOVERNMENT STRATEGIC DECISION MAKING". Miami University / OhioLINK, 2005. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=miami1124196112.
Texto completoBly, Theresa. "Impact of public perception on US national policy : a study of media influence in military and government decision making /". Monterey, Calif. : Springfield, Va. : Naval Postgraduate School ; Available from National Technical Information Service, 2002. http://library.nps.navy.mil/uhtbin/hyperion-image/02sep%5FBly.pdf.
Texto completoThesis advisor(s): Steven J. Iatrou, Anthony Pratkanis. Includes bibliographical references (p. 143-144). Also available online.
FERNANDES, Daniel. "Governments, public opinion, and social policy : change in Western Europe". Doctoral thesis, European University Institute, 2022. http://hdl.handle.net/1814/75046.
Texto completoExamining Board: Prof. Ellen Immergut (EUI, Supervisor); Prof. Anton Hemerijck (EUI); Prof. Christoffer Green-Pedersen (Aarhus University); Prof. Evelyne Hübscher (Central European University)
This dissertation investigates how public opinion and government partisanship affect social policy. It brings an innovative perspective that links the idea of democratic representation to debates about the welfare state. The general claim made here is that social policy is a function of public and government preferences. This claim hinges on two critical premises. The first relates to the general mechanisms that underlie government representation. Politicians have electoral incentives to align their actions with what citizens want. They may respond to public opinion indirectly by updating their party agendas, which can serve as the basis for social policy decisions in case they get elected. They may also respond directly by introducing welfare reforms that react to shifts in public opinion during their mandates. The second premise concerns how citizens and politicians structure their preferences over welfare. These preferences fall alongside two dimensions. First, general attitudes about how much should the state intervene in the economy to reduce inequality and promote economic well-being (how much policy). Second, the specific preferences about which social programmes should get better funding (what kind of policy). The empirical analysis is split into three empirical chapters. Each explores different aspects of government representation in Western European welfare states. The first empirical chapter (Chapter 4) asks how governments shape social policy when facing severe pressures to decrease spending. It argues that governments strategically reduce spending on programmes that offer less visible and indirect benefits, as they are less likely to trigger an electoral backlash. The experience of the Great Recession is consistent with this claim. Countries that faced the most challenging financial constraints cut down social investment and services. Except for Greece, they all preserved consumption schemes. The second empirical chapter (Chapter 5) explores how public opinion affects government spending priorities in different welfare programmes. It expects government responsiveness to depend on public mood for more or less government activity and the most salient social issues at the time. Empirical evidence from old-age, healthcare and education issue-policy areas supports these claims. Higher policy mood and issue saliency is positively associated with increasing spending efforts. Public opinion does not appear to affect unemployment policies. vii The third empirical chapter (Chapter 6) examines how party preferences affect spending priorities in unemployment programmes. It claims that preferences on economic intervention in the economy and welfare recalibration affect different components of unemployment policy. Evidence from the past 20 years bodes well with these expectations. The generosity of compensatory schemes depends on economic preferences. The left invests more than the right. The funding of active labour-market policies depends on both preference dimensions. Among conventional parties, their funding follows the same patterns as compensatory schemes. Among recalibration parties, parties across the economic spectrum present comparable spending patterns.
Quinn, Leon Roman. "The politics of pollution? : government, environmentalism and mass opinion in East Germany 1972-1990". Thesis, University of Bristol, 2002. http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.271839.
Texto completoCastora, Melissa. "OPINIONS ON GOVERNMENT SPENDING ON SOCIAL SECURITY: A YEAR AND COHORT ANALYSIS". Master's thesis, University of Central Florida, 2006. http://digital.library.ucf.edu/cdm/ref/collection/ETD/id/4116.
Texto completoM.A.
Department of Sociology and Anthropology
Arts and Sciences
Applied Sociology
McNairn, Jeffrey L. "The capacity to judge public opinion and deliberative democracy in Upper Canada, 1791-1854 /". Thesis, National Library of Canada = Bibliothèque nationale du Canada, 1997. http://www.collectionscanada.ca/obj/s4/f2/dsk2/ftp02/NQ27696.pdf.
Texto completoStitt, Ross William. "Public preferences: their influence through elections on the policy positions of incoming Australian federal governments". Thesis, The University of Sydney, 2016. http://hdl.handle.net/2123/16050.
Texto completoCremona, Rachel Karen. "A meaningful majority rediscovering government by the people /". Diss., Online access via UMI:, 2006.
Buscar texto completoLibros sobre el tema "GOVERNMENT OPINION"
Office, Great Britain Parliament House of Commons National Audit. Opinion pieces on improving government efficiency. London: The Stationery Office, 2007.
Buscar texto completoLippmann, Walter. Public opinion. New Brunswick, N.J., U.S.A: Transaction Publishers, 1997.
Buscar texto completoLippmann, Walter. Public opinion. New Brunswick, N.J., U.S.A: Transaction Publishers, 1991.
Buscar texto completo1954-, Norrander Barbara y Wilcox Clyde 1953-, eds. Understanding public opinion. 3a ed. Washington, D.C: CQ Press, 2009.
Buscar texto completo1954-, Norrander Barbara y Wilcox Clyde 1953-, eds. Understanding public opinion. Washington, D.C: CQ Press, 1997.
Buscar texto completoCapítulos de libros sobre el tema "GOVERNMENT OPINION"
Jillson, Cal. "Political Socialization and Public Opinion". En American Government, 93–127. Eleventh edition. | New York, NY : Routledge, 2021.: Routledge, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781003041764-4.
Texto completoJillson, Cal. "Political Socialization and Public Opinion". En American Government, 95–128. 12a ed. New York: Routledge, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781003303954-4.
Texto completoMartinez, Michael D., Jason Gainous y Stephen C. Craig. "Chapter 14. Measuring Ambivalence about Government". En Improving Public Opinion Surveys, editado por John H. Aldrich y Kathleen M. McGraw, 238–59. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/9781400840298.238.
Texto completoGinty, Roger Mac y John Darby. "On the Ground: Public Opinion and the Peace Process". En Guns and Government, 138–51. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2002. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9780230502000_9.
Texto completoStabauer, Martin, Christian Mayrhauser y Michael Karlinger. "Converting Opinion into Knowledge". En HCI in Business, Government, and Organizations: eCommerce and Innovation, 330–40. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39396-4_30.
Texto completoSplichal, Slavko. "From Bryce's ‘Government by Public Opinion’ to Global Governance – Without Public Opinion". En Journalismus und Öffentlichkeit, 57–71. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-92006-1_4.
Texto completoZhang, Wenping, Mengna Xu y Qiqi Jiang. "Opinion Mining and Sentiment Analysis in Social Media: Challenges and Applications". En HCI in Business, Government, and Organizations, 536–48. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91716-0_43.
Texto completoMoore, Martin. "Neither Free nor Fair? Government Opinion of the Press". En The Origins of Modern Spin, 101–21. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2006. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9780230625549_6.
Texto completoBlasco, Pol, José Moreira, Jordi Puiggalí, Jordi Cucurull y David Rebollo-Monedero. "Improving Opinion Analysis Through Statistical Disclosure Control in eVoting Scenarios". En Electronic Government and the Information Systems Perspective, 45–59. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98349-3_4.
Texto completoBuccafurri, Francesco, Lidia Fotia y Gianluca Lax. "Allowing Non-identifying Information Disclosure in Citizen Opinion Evaluation". En Technology-Enabled Innovation for Democracy, Government and Governance, 241–54. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40160-2_19.
Texto completoActas de conferencias sobre el tema "GOVERNMENT OPINION"
Kaschesky, Michael, Pawel Sobkowicz y Guillaume Bouchard. "Opinion mining in social media". En the 12th Annual International Digital Government Research Conference. New York, New York, USA: ACM Press, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2037556.2037607.
Texto completoKurniati, Poni Sukaesih y Suryanto. "Achievements Strategy for Unqualified Opinion in Bandung Government". En Proceedings of the International Conference on Business, Economic, Social Science, and Humanities – Economics, Business and Management Track (ICOBEST-EBM 2019). Paris, France: Atlantis Press, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.2991/aebmr.k.200108.051.
Texto completoRezk, Mohamed Adel, Ghada A. El Khayat, Adegboyega Ojo y Safaa Hussein. "A Government Decision Analytics Framework Based on Citizen Opinion". En ICEGOV '15-16: 9th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance. New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2910019.2910093.
Texto completoÖze, Nuran. "Public Opinion Perception on e-Government: The Case of Northern Cyprus". En The 19th European Conference on Digital Government. ACPI, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.34190/ecdg.19.063.
Texto completozhu, Jia. "Public Opinion: The Unique Value of Wechat to the Government". En Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Humanities Science, Management and Education Technology (HSMET 2019). Paris, France: Atlantis Press, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.2991/hsmet-19.2019.101.
Texto completoHu, Jiming y Xiang Zheng. "Opinion Extraction of Government Microblog Comments via BiLSTM-CRF Model". En JCDL '20: The ACM/IEEE Joint Conference on Digital Libraries in 2020. New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3383583.3398570.
Texto completoLei, Lei. "Study on the Discourse Power of Government in Public Opinion". En 2nd International Conference on Contemporary Education, Social Sciences and Humanities (ICCESSH 2017). Paris, France: Atlantis Press, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.2991/iccessh-17.2017.223.
Texto completoTian, Ye y Guoray Cai. "Collective Opinion Formation for Public Decision Making in Local Governments". En dg.o '16: 17th International Digital Government Research Conference. New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2912160.2912194.
Texto completoCortis, Keith y Brian Davis. "A Social Opinion Gold Standard for the Malta Government Budget 2018". En Proceedings of the 5th Workshop on Noisy User-generated Text (W-NUT 2019). Stroudsburg, PA, USA: Association for Computational Linguistics, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.18653/v1/d19-5547.
Texto completoChen, Baike y Pei Deng. "Simulation Study of Multi-public Opinion Communication Based on Government Intervention". En 2021 International Conference on Culture-oriented Science & Technology (ICCST). IEEE, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/iccst53801.2021.00066.
Texto completoInformes sobre el tema "GOVERNMENT OPINION"
Adegoke, Damilola, Natasha Chilambo, Adeoti Dipeolu, Ibrahim Machina, Ade Obafemi-Olopade y Dolapo Yusuf. Public discourses and Engagement on Governance of Covid-19 in Ekiti State, Nigeria. African Leadership Center, King's College London, diciembre de 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.47697/lab.202101.
Texto completoSoroka, Anastasia. Повномасштабна фаза російсько-української війни: висвітлення в іспанських медіа (2022). Ivan Franko National University of Lviv, marzo de 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.30970/vjo.2023.52-53.11734.
Texto completoAgrawal, Asha Weinstein y Hilary Nixon. What Do Americans Think About Federal Tax Options to Support Transportation? Results from Year Thirteen of a National Survey. Mineta Transportation Institute, abril de 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.31979/mti.2023.2208.2.
Texto completoAgrawal, Asha Weinstein y Hilary Nixon. What Do Americans Think About Federal Tax Options to Support Transportation? Results from Year Twelve of a National Survey. Mineta Transportation Institute, junio de 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.31979/mti.2021.2101.
Texto completoOwens, Janine, G. Hussein Rassool, Josh Bernstein, Sara Latif y Basil H. Aboul-Enein. Interventions using the Qur'an to protect and promote mental health: A systematic scoping review. INPLASY - International Platform of Registered Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Protocols, julio de 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.37766/inplasy2022.7.0065.
Texto completoHutchinson, Paul, Adolor Aisiri, Udochisom Anaba, Elizabeth Omoluabi, Akanni Akinyemi, U. C. Ifunanya Ozoadibe y Dele Abegunde. Behavioral sentinel surveillance survey in Nigeria: Endline technical report. Population Council, junio de 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.31899/sbsr2023.1020.
Texto completoArzheimer, Kai. To Russia with love? German populist actors’ positions vis-a-vis the Kremlin. European Center for Populism Studies (ECPS), marzo de 2003. http://dx.doi.org/10.55271/rp0020.
Texto completoLenhardt, Amanda. The Social Economic Impacts of Covid-19 in Informal Urban Settlements. Institute of Development Studies, septiembre de 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.19088/cc.2021.008.
Texto completoAlbornoz, Facundo, Guillermo Cruces y María Lombardi. Trusting Covid-19 recommendations: The role of experts, markets and governments. Inter-American Development Bank, agosto de 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.18235/0005097.
Texto completoGómez Vidal, Analía, Fabiana Machado y Darcia Datshkovsky. Water and Sanitation Services in Latin America: Access and Quality Outlook. Inter-American Development Bank, abril de 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.18235/0003285.
Texto completo