Literatura académica sobre el tema "Foucault, Michel (1926-1984 ; philosophe) – Cinéma"
Crea una cita precisa en los estilos APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard y otros
Consulte las listas temáticas de artículos, libros, tesis, actas de conferencias y otras fuentes académicas sobre el tema "Foucault, Michel (1926-1984 ; philosophe) – Cinéma".
Junto a cada fuente en la lista de referencias hay un botón "Agregar a la bibliografía". Pulsa este botón, y generaremos automáticamente la referencia bibliográfica para la obra elegida en el estilo de cita que necesites: APA, MLA, Harvard, Vancouver, Chicago, etc.
También puede descargar el texto completo de la publicación académica en formato pdf y leer en línea su resumen siempre que esté disponible en los metadatos.
Artículos de revistas sobre el tema "Foucault, Michel (1926-1984 ; philosophe) – Cinéma":
Tofts, Darren y Lisa Gye. "Cool Beats and Timely Accents". M/C Journal 16, n.º 4 (11 de agosto de 2013). http://dx.doi.org/10.5204/mcj.632.
Tesis sobre el tema "Foucault, Michel (1926-1984 ; philosophe) – Cinéma":
Stadelmaier, Philipp. "kommentare zum (post-)kino : Serge Daneys kritiken (1962 – 1992) und Jean-Luc Godard „histoire(s) du cinéma“ (1988 – 1998)". Electronic Thesis or Diss., Paris 8, 2020. http://www.theses.fr/2020PA080012.
This thesis deals with the works of film critic Serge Daney and Jean-Luc Godard’s Histoire(s) du cinema, which I will interpret on the basis of Maurice Blanchot’s notion of “critique”, Jacques Derrida’s notion of “supplément” and Michel Foucault’s concept of “commentaire”. I will argue that Daney’s texts and Godard’s montages function as criticism and commentaries that perpetuate a “supplement of cinema”. While Blanchot's criticism “completes” the work of art (in this case the film) by interpreting it, Derrida's supplement signifies a lack of meaning in the act of writing, Foucault's notion of commentary allows to go beyond the dimension of the singular work and to refer to cinema as a concrete epistemological object, a primary text ("the cinema"). According to Foucault the commentary repeats a primary text while preserving its inexhaustible potential of meaning. Based on this thought, I will approach Daney’s and Godard's works from a post-cinema perspective. In the digital age in which cinema has undergone various transformations, the meaning of the concept of “cinema” is constantly being re-evaluated. Unlike a general understanding of cinema as apparatus, place or specific medium, I conceive cinema as a text that constantly needs to be interpreted and supplemented
Alenezi, Ahmad. "La problématique de la folie chez michel foucault". Paris 8, 2011. http://www.theses.fr/2011PA084196.
Ségura, Philip. "Michel Foucault : l'espace non-dialectique". Paris 8, 2005. http://www.theses.fr/2005PA083689.
The objective was to understand from the sentence of Michel Foucault: "Je n'accepte pas ce mot, dialectique. Non et non ! Il faut que les choses soient bien claires. Dès que l'on prononce le mot "dialectique" on commence à accepter, même si on ne le dit pas, le schéma hégélien de la thèse et de l'antithèse, et avec lui une forme de logique qui me paraît inadéquate, si l'on veut donner de ces problèmes une description vraiment concrète. ", the movement coming from the thought determinations which would go from the plan of immanence towards the modes of conceptualization. Many philosophers allotted to Foucault various periods of evolution of his thinking. I started my study by presupposing that Foucault worked throughout his life around the same level of immanence and that he continuously tried to explain it starting from the knowledge of various socio-history disciplines. And I tried to understand this movement which goes from the level of immanence to a conceptualization of his thinking built around the critical tradition. Foucault wants to proof that philosophy constructed the subject and a system of the human conscience. The dialectics presents itself as the central point of this system. How to understand the presence of the concept by knowing that above all it is the result of the overlapping connection of subject in the socio-history thinking?
Coelho, de Souza Sandra. "L'éthique de Michel Foucault". Paris 10, 1995. http://www.theses.fr/1995PA100118.
My thesis shout Michel Foucault is mostly concerned by Foucault’s thought between "madness and civilization" (1960) and "history of sexuality" (1984). If one considers the thesis bibliography, it's possible to understand that Foucault’s work considered by me as more important of his thought is not always proposed by Foucault’s books; many articles and interviews elucidate the aims and trajectory of Foucault. This is the reason why they play an important role in the thesis. During one of his stays in Berkeley (October 1980), Foucault explain the themes of his ethics: "I am a moralist, insofar as a believe that one of the tasks, one of the meanings of human existence - the source of human freedom - is never to accept anything as definitiven untouchable, obvious or immobile" (history of the present, spring 1980). In this interview conducted by m. Bess, Foucault exposes the three elements of his moral thought. They are: "(1) the refusal to accept as self-evident the things that are proposed to us" - it concerns the first chapter of my thesis(l'experience fondamentale); "(2)the need to analyses and to know, since we can accomplishe nothing without reflexion and understanding thus the principle of curiosity" - it concerns la problematisation
Ahmade, Ramez. "L'éthique comme pratique de la liberté selon Michel Foucault". Electronic Thesis or Diss., Paris 8, 2016. http://www.theses.fr/2016PA080030.
This thesis proposes, following Michel Foucault’s work, an enquiry into the ethics of the subject as a possible way to free oneself from knowledge-power relations and the effects of subjectivation. Freedom cannot, however, be identified with a simple emancipation from an external power; it is, in its ultimate form, a voluntary choice, a self-action that carries the project of forging its own subjectivity, with the use of its own techniques. It’s a “becoming-subject”, namely, having the ability to act, to produce, and to transform itself into a political and social subject. The aim of this thesis is to show the value and importance of an ethical approach for the present time, the issue at hand being the subject and its ability to be the agent and the master of its existence
Owono, Essono Aristide. "Homme, société et pouvoir : lecture foucaldienne de l'humanisme kantien". Electronic Thesis or Diss., Amiens, 2021. http://www.theses.fr/2021AMIE0011.
Since his appearance in the world, man has always put the gods at the center of his existence. It was with the gods that he found the right stability between managing his existential fears and his constant desire to understand the laws of the universe. But, this theocentrism will be broken because the history of humanity is deeply marked by the destitution of the gods for the benefit of man, it is the advent of anthropocentrism, an attitude that puts man at the center of all. And later, this philosophical anthropocentrism will give birth to what is today called humanism, which also manifests itself in a deep love and unconditional respect for all that relates to human dignity in general. Emmanuel Kant (1724-1804) is one of the greatest essential figures of this humanist current, he will sublimate human nature at its peak. Indeed, with a rigorous and methodical use of reason (pure and practical), Kant's rationalist humanism has the ambition to make man an absolutely free and autonomous being, virtuous, creator and possessor of knowledge (or of truth), architect of the evolution of societies. Ultimately, one gets the impression that he always does everything in the interests of humanity. However, Michel Foucault (1926-1984) will undertake a radical deconstruction of the Kantian subject despite the great capacities that he has. In fact, Foucault will criticize Kantian humanism as a whole because of the importance he gives to man. Thus, for the good of all, the French philosopher believes that "the death of man" becomes an absolute requirement. This hostile attitude leads us to seriously question the true foundations of humanism. Indeed, why is man a danger? Should we admit that humanism is no longer useful to us today? And if the man is no longer important, what should he be replaced by? At this stage, it becomes imperative to proceed to an analysis of Foucault's zetetic approach in order to understand his real intentions. Essentially, this theoretical confrontation that he undertakes with Kant will allow us to reflect on the contemporary issues of humanism in the era of postmodernity
Kozlowski, Michal. "Fonctions du discours et figures du sujet : Michel Foucault, théoricien de la liberté". Paris, EHESS, 2004. http://www.theses.fr/2004EHES0073.
Michel Foucault is often perceived as the one willing to deconstruct the very idea of the subject. In my analysis I attempt to show the contrary. Foucault's cautious work aims at the reconstruction of the concept of the subject in order to think it through both it its limitations and the possibilities to realiza its freedom. In that perspective I account for two key notions that Foucault works out : the one of the actuality abd the one of the genealogy. I introduce in Foucault theoretical structure the spinozian concept of conatus understood, as permanent will of the self-constitution of a subject by the subject. These three notions together let me account for political strategies of emancipation in the Foucaultian sense. The main argument developed in my dissertation leads to the conclusion that Michel Foucault far from being a new conservatism offers as a matter of the new visions of progressivism, a skeptical one perhaps but genuinely mature
Martins, Victor Mendonça Nobre. "L'Oedipe selon Foucault : Foucault lecteur et non-lecteur de Freud à travers le «complexe d’Oedipe»". Electronic Thesis or Diss., Sorbonne Paris Cité, 2019. http://www.theses.fr/2019USPCC069.
Foucault's work, from the 1970s until his death in 1984, was marked by a critique of the "Oedipus complex", a concept essential to Freud. The radicalism of Foucault's critics would have implied, on the one hand, a certain distance from the psychoanalysts of his works and, on the other hand, that his readers take a certain distance from the Freudian letter. A fundamental detail to the understanding of this difficult interlocution: the references of the philosopher to the "Oedipus complex" were always formulated without presenting to his readers any quote from Freud. From within his own text, which systematically refers to the work of the psychoanalyst, Foucault summoned each time his interlocutor without ever giving him the floor. What reading of Freud would he have done? How could he write so much on the "Oedipus complex" without ever mentioning Freud? In order to identify the modalities, the aspects, the forms of this erased reading operation, we will approach the main Foucaldian references to the "Oedipus complex" and their negative logic
Colombo, Agustin. "Le bios de la brebis : la problématique de la subjectivité dans le christianisme chez Michel Foucault". Electronic Thesis or Diss., Paris 8, 2017. http://www.theses.fr/2017PA080114.
This dissertation investigates the genealogical value that Michel Foucault assigns to Christianity focusing on the configuration of subjectivity, particularly on the way of life as a main domain in which subjectivity is constituted. More precisely, the dissertation is structured by following the three genealogical domains or constitutive areas of “focal points of experience” in Foucault’s last works. The first part tackles the problem of truth, in particular for what concerns the forms of veridiction; the second part focuses on the analysis of the forms of power, or more exactly, the techniques of governmentality; the last part approaches the forms of subjectivation or the practices of self. Based on available Foucauldian corpus and unpublished material –especially the Confessions of the Flesh (Les aveux de la chair) – the description and analysis of these three domains aim to answer two fundamental questions related to the Foucauldian diagnosis of the present: What is the historical role of Christianity in the configuration of the current forms of subjection? Are there any Christian phenomena according to which we could resist to those forms of subjection?
Jacinthe, Fodnot. "L’éthique publique, de l’équité de la justice chez Rawls à la norme, la biopolitique et la vérité chez Foucault". Electronic Thesis or Diss., Paris 8, 2022. http://www.theses.fr/2022PA080087.
My public ethics as a reflection between humanity and sovereignty shows a double contribution of the political subject and the state in the production of the values that we need collectively. The political subject brings a word or a speech inspired by the human fundamental needs and the human conditional of life. The human point of view discussed inside this work is also understood by the rawlsian inviolability of the person and the human rights as priority which express a lot of preoccupations toward mankind as dignified creatures. Moreover, the foucaldian biopolitics suggests a system of state control of the mankind as a biological being and also taking care of their human nature. The dynamism of the political subject is not able to weaken the state encouragement to increase the power, his enlightenment and his influence, and his perpetuity. The public ethics set up a space of justification and legitimization of the public decisions and the behavior of every body. That will be in the advantage of the well-being of the community collectively and the comfort of everybody specially when the commitment of the political subject brings him to tell the truth about himself, his life and the condition of life. John Rawls by his equity and his justice system provides values giving man and woman access to comfort and well-being in his well organized society against all sense of utilitarianism. Because, a society with constitutional democracy provides a system of values previously accepted for the absolute respect of the person, from which perceiving the equitable distribution of property (fundamental liberties, the distribution of the resources and the country’s wealth on the profit of desadvantaged and poor people, and values aiming for durable political consensus). Even though, the political and legal reality, the constancy of the fight justify mostly the effectiveness of those values