Libros sobre el tema "Effluent"

Ogden, Graham. Zero effluent papermaking. Manchester: UMIST, 1997.

King County (Wash.). Dept. of Metropolitan Services., ed. Effluent transfer system. Seattle, Wash: King County Dept. of Metropolitan Services, Water Pollution Control Dept., Technical Publications Section, 1994.

Cussion, Sylvia. N-nitrosodimethylamine in industrial effluents and sewage influent and effluent: Report. [Toronto]: Quality Management Unit, Ontario Ministry of the Environment, 1991.

Municipal Industrial Strategy for Abatement Program (Ontario), ed. Draft effluent monitoring and effluent limits regulation, electric power generation sector. [Toronto, Ont.]: Queen's Printer for Ontario, 1994.

Chowdhury, M. D. H. Effluent-free yarn dyeing. Manchester: UMIST, 1992.

Post, L. E. Effluent mixing zone studies. Toronto: Water Resources Branch, 1985.

Baumgartner, D. J. Dilution models for effluent discharges. 2^a ed. [Washington, D.C.]: Standards and Applied Science Division, Office of Science and Technology, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1993.

Perry, Maria. The handbook of brewery effluent. [South Africa]: Brewery Effluent Services, 1997.

Baumgartner, D. J. Dilution models for effluent discharges. 3^a ed. Newport, OR: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Pacific Ecosystems Branch, 1994.

Feigin, Amos, Israela Ravina y Joseph Shalhevet. Irrigation with Treated Sewage Effluent. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 1991. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-74480-8.

Canada. Environmental Protection Service. Technology Development and Technical Services Branch. y Beak Engineering, eds. Anaerobic treatment of dairy effluent. Ottawa: Environment Canada, 1986.

Institution of Chemical Engineers (Great Britain). Yorkshire Branch., ed. Effluent treatment and waste disposal. Rugby, UK: Institution of Chemical Engineers, 1990.

Dosanjh, Manjit Kaur. Studies on an aromatic effluent. Birmingham: University of Birmingham, 1985.

Olsen, Pernille. Environmental legislation Scotland: aqueous effluent. Edinburgh: Centre for Environment & Business in Scotland, 1993.

Johnson, Catherine M. The emperical relationship between BOD and COD, and BOD and TOC, established for the non-industrial season final effluent, Post Point Pollution Control Plant, Bellingham, Washington. Bellingham, Wash: Huxley College of Environmental Studies, Western Washington University, 1986.

Great Britain. Department of Agriculture for Northern Ireland. Water: Preventing pollution - by silage effluent. Belfast: Department of Agriculture for Northern Ireland, 1991.

Marshall, Randall. Whole effluent toxicity (WET): Program evaluation. Olympia, WA: Washington State Dept. of Ecology, 1998.

Lai, T. H. VOC removal from gas effluent streams. Manchester: UMIST, 1998.

Srinivas, C. TBP production plant effluent treatment process. Mumbai: Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, 2004.

Consultants, Sentar y Northern River Basins Study (Canada), eds. Regulatory requirements for nutrient effluent discharges. Edmonton: The Study, 1994.

H, Castro S., Vergara F y Sánchez M. A, eds. Effluent treatment in the mining industry. Concepción: University of Concepción, 1998.

Deese, Patricia L. An evaluation of septic leachate detection. Cincinnati, OH: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Water Engineering Research Laboratory, 1986.

Deese, Patricia L. An evaluation of septic leachate detection. Cincinnati, OH: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Water Engineering Research Laboratory, 1986.

Lühr, Hans-Peter. Einl eitewerte für kontaminierte Wässer: Anforderungen an kontaminierte Wässer aus Grundwassersanierungsmassnahmen, Bodenwaschvorgängen, Grundwasserabpumpungen sowie Stör- und Unfällen bei der Einleitung in Oberflächengewässer und Kanalisation. Berlin: E. Schmidt, 1992.

Consultants, Sentar y Northern River Basins Study (Canada), eds. A synthesis of information on effluent characteristics of municipal and non-pulp mill industrial sources in the Peace, Athabasca and Slave River Basins. Edmonton, Alta: Northern River Basins Study, 1996.

Sharma, Sandeep K. Dewatering of Alaska placer effluent using PEO. Washington, D.C. (810 7th St., N.W., Washington 20241-0001): U.S. Dept. of the Interior, Bureau of Mines, 1992.

Hough, D. B. The design of distributed effluent treatment systems. Manchester: UMIST, 1994.

Zaloum, Ronalds. Biological treatment of textile finishing mill effluent. Ottawa: Conservation and Protection, Environment Canada, 1987.

Oldfield, D. W. Recovery of valuable materials from silage effluent. Manchester: UMIST, 1993.

Kuo, Wen-Chu J. The design of distributed effluent treatment systems. Manchester: UMIST, 1993.

P, Bernhart Alfred. Evapotranspiration nutrient uptake soilinfiltration of effluent water. Toronto, Can: A.P. Bernhart, 1985.

R, Johnson. Innovative flow-through wetland for effluent disposal. S.l: s.n, 1986.

Sharma, Sandeep K. Dewatering of Alaska placer effluent using PEO. Washington, DC: U.S. Dept. of the Interior, Bureau of Mines, 1992.

Myers, B. J. Sustainable effluent-irrigated plantations: An Australian guideline. Canberra: CSIRO Forestry and Forest Products, 1999.

British Columbia. Legislative Assembly. Select Standing Committee on Public Accounts. Pulp and paper mill effluent permit monitoring. Victoria, B.C: Select Standing Committee on Public Accounts, 2000.

Simms, David. Recent trends in effluent quality: Balmer Lake. Toronto, Ont: Environmental Applications Group, 1989.

Gray, T. W. Effluent treatment plant for Britoil's Nigg Terminal. London: Institute of Petroleum, 1985.

Shah, Maulin P. Bio-Nano Filtration in Industrial Effluent Treatment. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.1201/9781003165149.

Anderson, William. Economic analysis of final effluent limitations guidelines and standards for commercial hazardous waste combustors. Washington, DC: Engineering and Analysis Division, Office of Science and Technology, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Water, 2000.

Anderson, William. Economic analysis of final effluent limitations guidelines and standards for commercial hazardous waste combustors. Washington, DC: Engineering and Analysis Division, Office of Science and Technology, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2000.

Diamond, J. Evaluation of WET testing as an indicator of aquatic health in effluent-dominated streams: A pilot study. Alexandria, VA: WERF, Water Environment Research Foundation, 2007.

Anderson, William. Economic analysis of final effluent limitations guidelines and standards for commercial hazardous waste combustors. Washington, DC: Engineering and Analysis Division, Office of Science and Technology, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2000.

Section, Ontario Ministry of Environment and Energy Program Development Branch Industrial Effluents. Draft development document, clean water regulation for the electric power generation sector: Effluent monitoring and effluent limits : report. Toronto: Queen's Printer for Ontario, 1994.

M, DeGraeve G. y Water Environment Research Foundation, eds. WET testing program: Evaluation of practices and implementation, Project 94-HE-1, 1998. Alexandria, VA: Water Environment Research Foundation, 1998.

Horning, William B. Short-term methods for estimating the chronic toxicity of effluents and receiving waters to freshwater organisms. Cincinnati, OH: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Environmental Monitoring and Support Laboratory, 1986.

Sargeant, Debby. Lilliwaup Bay bacterial source identification monitoring. [Olympia, Wash.]: Washington State Dept. of Ecology, 1999.

Horning, William B. Short-term methods for estimating the chronic toxicity of effluents and receiving waters to freshwater organisms. Cincinnati, OH: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Environmental Monitoring and Support Laboratory, 1986.

Paschal, James E. Simulation of water quality and the effects of wastewater effluent on the South Platte River from Chatfield Reservoir through Denver, Colorado. Denver, Colo: U.S. Dept. of the Interior, U.S. Geological Survey, 1991.

Horning, William B. Short-term methods for estimating the chronic toxicity of effluents and receiving waters to freshwater organisms. Cincinnati, OH: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Environmental Monitoring and Support Laboratory, 1986.

United States. Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Science and Technology. Engineering and Analysis Division, ed. Cost-effectiveness analysis for the final action regarding pretreatment standards for the industrial laundries point source category: Final report. 2^a ed. Washington, D.C: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Science and Technology, 2000.