Acceder

Bibliografías temáticas / DSAEK

Índice

Artículos de revistas

Literatura académica sobre el tema "DSAEK"

Autor: Grafiati

Publicado: 10 de marzo de 2023

Última modificación: 15 de junio de 2025

Crea una cita precisa en los estilos APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard y otros

Elija tipo de fuente:

Consulte las listas temáticas de artículos, libros, tesis, actas de conferencias y otras fuentes académicas sobre el tema "DSAEK".

Junto a cada fuente en la lista de referencias hay un botón "Agregar a la bibliografía". Pulsa este botón, y generaremos automáticamente la referencia bibliográfica para la obra elegida en el estilo de cita que necesites: APA, MLA, Harvard, Vancouver, Chicago, etc.

También puede descargar el texto completo de la publicación académica en formato pdf y leer en línea su resumen siempre que esté disponible en los metadatos.

Artículos de revistas sobre el tema "DSAEK"

1

Bhandari, Vipul, Jagdeesh K. Reddy, Kirti Relekar, and Vijayalakshmi Prabhu. "Descemet’s Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty versus Descemet’s Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty in the Fellow Eye for Fuchs Endothelial Dystrophy: A Retrospective Study." BioMed Research International 2015 (2015): 1–7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/750567.

Texto completo

Resumen

Aim. To evaluate visual outcome and endothelial cell density (ECD) after Descemet’s Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty (DMEK) in comparison with Descemet’s Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty (DSAEK) in the fellow eye for Fuchs endothelial dystrophy (FED).Design. Single-centre, retrospective case series.Methods. 30 eyes of 30 patients undergoing DMEK, who completed a 1-year follow-up, were compared with 30 fellow eyes which underwent DSAEK for bilateral FED. Main outcome measures studied included Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) and ECD during a 1-year follow-up period.Results. BCVA improved from 0.78 ± 0.35 logMAR, and 0.73 ± 0.31 logMAR before surgery to 0.22 ± 0.1 logMAR and 0.35 ± 0.12 logMAR 6 months after DMEK and DSEK, respectively (P<0.001). At one year after surgery, the BCVA was maintained at 0.21 ± 0.12 logMAR and 0.34 ± 0.1 logMAR, respectively, after DMEK and DSAEK. A statistically better visual outcome was observed after DMEK compared to DSAEK (P<0.05) in fellow eyes.Conclusions. DMEK provided better visual rehabilitation when compared to DSAEK. Nevertheless, there were no significant differences with regard to the ECD within a 1-year follow-up.

Los estilos APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.

2

John, Thomas. "Diferencia entre DSEK, DSAEK & DMEK." Highlights of Ophthalmology 43, no. 5ESP (2015): 9–11. http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/hos-10101-43503.

Texto completo

Los estilos APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.

3

John, Thomas. "Difference Among DSEK, DSAEK & DMEK." Highlights of Ophthalmology 43, no. 5ENG (2015): 9–11. http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/hoo-10101-43503.

Texto completo

Los estilos APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.

4

Wisse, Robert P. L., Jens A. Achterberg, and Allegonda Van der Lelij. "DSAEK." Cornea 33, no. 3 (2014): 230–34. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/ico.0000000000000042.

Texto completo

Los estilos APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.

5

Droutsas, Konstantinos, Myrsini Petrelli, Dimitrios Miltsakakis, et al. "Visual Outcomes of Ultrathin-Descemet Stripping Endothelial Keratoplasty versus Descemet Stripping Endothelial Keratoplasty." Journal of Ophthalmology 2018 (November 1, 2018): 1–5. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/5924058.

Texto completo

Resumen

Purpose. To examine the impact of graft thickness (GT) on postoperative visual acuity and endothelial cell density after ultrathin-Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (UT-DSAEK) versus conventional DSAEK. Methods. The medical records of all patients who underwent DSAEK at our institute during a 2-year period were reviewed. After excluding subjects with low visual potential, 34 eyes were divided into two groups based on the postoperative GT as measured with anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT): an UT-DSAEK group (GT ≤ 100 μm, n=13 eyes) and a DSAEK group (GT > 100 μm, n=21 eyes). The groups were compared with regard to best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), subjective refraction, central corneal thickness (CCT), GT, and endothelial cell density (ECD). Results. Preoperative BCVA (logMAR) was 1.035 ± 0.514 and 0.772 ± 0.428 for UT-DSAEK and DSAEK, respectively (P=0.072). At 6 months postoperatively, BCVA was 0.088 ± 0.150 following UT-DSAEK and 0.285 ± 0.158 following DSAEK (P=0.001). Conclusion. DSAEK grafts with a thickness under 100 μm offered better visual outcomes during the early postoperative period.

Los estilos APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.

6

Hsiao, Chen, Meir, et al. "Clinical Outcomes of Penetrating Keratoplasty and Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty in Asian Population with American Corneas." International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 16, no. 22 (2019): 4547. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16224547.

Texto completo

Resumen

To determine the comparative efficacy and safety of penetrating keratoplasty (PK) and Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) in the Asian population receiving imported donor corneas, our single-center retrospective study provides analysis supporting the transition from PK to DSAEK in the Asian population using imported American donor corneas. We analyzed 259 patients with 241 and 57 cases of PK and DSAEK respectively during 2008 to 2017 using imported corneas at Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou, Taiwan. In terms of long-term graft survival analysis, there was no difference between PK and DSAEK (log-rank p = 0.386, HR = 0.920, 95% CI: [0.641–1.380]). However, Cox proportional regression analysis revealed that corneal survival rate of DSAEK group in the first 100 days after transplantation was inferior than that of PK group (log-rank p < 0.001, HR = 2.733, 95% CI: [1.501–4.977])]. Despite the inferior survival rate, there were significantly less neovascularization and Descemet membrane folds in the DSAEK group. Importantly, the non-complication rate of DSAEK was much higher than that of PK with significant difference (PK, 25.7% vs DSAEK 42.0%, p = 0.022). Collectively, DSAEK is suggested as an alternative surgical modality in Asian patients using imported American donor corneas because of less complication, and no difference in long-term corneal graft survival rates between PK and DSAEK.

Los estilos APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.

7

Taravella, Michael J., Vipul Shah, and Richard Davidson. "Ultrathin DSAEK." International Ophthalmology Clinics 53, no. 2 (2013): 21–30. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/iio.0b013e31827823a8.

Texto completo

Los estilos APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.

8

Castellucci, Massimo, Costanza Novara, Alessandra Casuccio, et al. "Bilateral Ultrathin Descemet’s Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty vs. Bilateral Penetrating Keratoplasty in Fuchs’ Dystrophy: Corneal Higher-Order Aberrations, Contrast Sensitivity and Quality of Life." Medicina 57, no. 2 (2021): 133. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina57020133.

Texto completo

Resumen

Background and Objectives: The objective of this paper is to compare the visual outcomes and quality of life (QoL) after bilateral ultrathin Descemet’s stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (UT-DSAEK) with bilateral penetrating keratoplasty (PK) for Fuchs’ endothelial dystrophy (FED). Materials and Methods: Retrospective comparative cohort study, including 11 patients with FED who underwent bilateral PK and 13 patients with FED who underwent bilateral UT-DSAEK. All patients were already pseudophakic or had undergone a combined cataract procedure. The main outcomes were corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) corneal higher-order aberrations (HOAs), contrast sensitivity (CS) and quality of life (QoL). Results: The mean follow-up after the second eye surgery was 32.5 ± 10.2 months in PK and 19.6 ± 8.6 months in UT-DSAEK patients. The CDVA in the UT-DSAEK group was significantly better than in the PK one (0.18 ± 0.07 vs. 0.35 ± 0.16 logMAR, p < 0.0001). The mean anterior corneal total HOAs of the central 5 mm were significantly lower in UT-DSAEK eyes than in PK eyes (0.438 ± 0.078 µ and 1.282 ± 0.330 µ respectively, p < 0.0001), whilst the mean posterior total HOAs did not differ between groups (0.196 ± 0.056 µ and 0.231 ± 0.089 µ, respectively, p = 0.253). The CS was lower at 0.75 and 1.5 cycles/degree in P the K group when compared to the DSAEK one (p = 0.008 and 0.005, respectively). The QoL scores by the NEI RQL-42 test exhibited better values in DSAEK patients in 9 out of 13 scales. Conclusion: Our study confirms that UT-DSAEK provides a better visual function in terms of CDVA and CS, together with lower HOAs, when compared to PK. Hence, the vision-related QoL, binocularly evaluated by the NEI RQL-42 items, indicates a higher satisfaction in UT-DSAEK eyes.

Los estilos APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.

9

Dapena, Isabel, Lisanne Ham, and Gerrit RJ Melles. "Endothelial keratoplasty: DSEK/DSAEK or DMEK - the thinner the better?" Current Opinion in Ophthalmology 20, no. 4 (2009): 299–307. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/icu.0b013e32832b8d18.

Texto completo

Los estilos APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.

10

Smyth, Aoife, Grace Anne McCabe, Patrick Murtagh, and Elizabeth Margaret McElnea. "Tectonic Descemet’s stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty for corneal perforation." BMJ Case Reports 15, no. 4 (2022): e247345. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bcr-2021-247345.

Texto completo

Resumen

We report the use of Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) for the treatment of sterile corneal perforation after trauma. In an eye with corneal perforation and cataract due to trauma, cataract surgery and DSAEK were performed. Corneal integrity was promptly restored and the patient avoided tectonic anterior lamellar and penetrating keratoplasty. DSAEK may be performed for the management of corneal perforation.

Los estilos APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.

Más fuentes

Ofrecemos descuentos en todos los planes premium para autores cuyas obras están incluidas en selecciones literarias temáticas. ¡Contáctenos para obtener un código promocional único!