Literatura académica sobre el tema "Derrida, Jacques (1930-2004) – Cinéma"
Crea una cita precisa en los estilos APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard y otros
Consulte las listas temáticas de artículos, libros, tesis, actas de conferencias y otras fuentes académicas sobre el tema "Derrida, Jacques (1930-2004) – Cinéma".
Junto a cada fuente en la lista de referencias hay un botón "Agregar a la bibliografía". Pulsa este botón, y generaremos automáticamente la referencia bibliográfica para la obra elegida en el estilo de cita que necesites: APA, MLA, Harvard, Vancouver, Chicago, etc.
También puede descargar el texto completo de la publicación académica en formato pdf y leer en línea su resumen siempre que esté disponible en los metadatos.
Artículos de revistas sobre el tema "Derrida, Jacques (1930-2004) – Cinéma":
Nancy, Jean-Luc. "Jacques Derrida (1930-2004)". Hermès 41, n.º 1 (2005): 174. http://dx.doi.org/10.4267/2042/8969.
Eze, Emmanuel C. y Bruce Janz. "Jacques Derrida, 1930–2004". Philosophia Africana 8, n.º 1 (2005): 79–82. http://dx.doi.org/10.5840/philafricana20058115.
H., Y. "Jacques Derrida (1930-2004)". Critique 690, n.º 11 (2004): 852. http://dx.doi.org/10.3917/criti.690.0852.
McQuillan, Martin. "‘another death’ Jacques Derrida (1930–2004)". Parallax 11, n.º 1 (enero de 2005): 79–87. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1353464052000323928.
Fleming, Chris y John O'Carroll. "In Memoriam: Jacques Derrida (1930-2004)". Anthropological Quarterly 78, n.º 1 (2005): 137–50. http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/anq.2005.0009.
Schmidt, Dennis. "In Memoriam: Jacques Derrida (1930–2004)". Research in Phenomenology 35, n.º 1 (2005): 1–3. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/1569164054905492.
Benslama, Fethi. "La grâce de Jacques Derrida 1930-2004". Insaniyat / إنسانيات, n.º 27 (31 de marzo de 2005): 3–8. http://dx.doi.org/10.4000/insaniyat.7587.
Krieger, Peter. "La deconstrucción de Jacques Derrida (1930-2004)". Anales del Instituto de Investigaciones Estéticas 26, n.º 84 (7 de agosto de 2012): 179. http://dx.doi.org/10.22201/iie.18703062e.2004.84.2179.
Hodge, Joanna. "Jacques Derrida: 1930–2004 a Critical Appreciation". Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology 36, n.º 2 (enero de 2005): 121–28. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00071773.2005.11006537.
Halpern, Catherine. "Jacques Derrida (1930-2004). La subversion pour philosophie". Sciences Humaines N° Hors-série, HS11 (6 de enero de 2022): 42. http://dx.doi.org/10.3917/sh.hs11.0042.
Tesis sobre el tema "Derrida, Jacques (1930-2004) – Cinéma":
Nardin, Patrick. "Effacer, déconstruire, défaire : pratiques de la défaillance en peinture, vidéo, cinéma". Paris 1, 2008. http://www.theses.fr/2008PA010575.
Stadelmaier, Philipp. "kommentare zum (post-)kino : Serge Daneys kritiken (1962 – 1992) und Jean-Luc Godard „histoire(s) du cinéma“ (1988 – 1998)". Electronic Thesis or Diss., Paris 8, 2020. http://www.theses.fr/2020PA080012.
This thesis deals with the works of film critic Serge Daney and Jean-Luc Godard’s Histoire(s) du cinema, which I will interpret on the basis of Maurice Blanchot’s notion of “critique”, Jacques Derrida’s notion of “supplément” and Michel Foucault’s concept of “commentaire”. I will argue that Daney’s texts and Godard’s montages function as criticism and commentaries that perpetuate a “supplement of cinema”. While Blanchot's criticism “completes” the work of art (in this case the film) by interpreting it, Derrida's supplement signifies a lack of meaning in the act of writing, Foucault's notion of commentary allows to go beyond the dimension of the singular work and to refer to cinema as a concrete epistemological object, a primary text ("the cinema"). According to Foucault the commentary repeats a primary text while preserving its inexhaustible potential of meaning. Based on this thought, I will approach Daney’s and Godard's works from a post-cinema perspective. In the digital age in which cinema has undergone various transformations, the meaning of the concept of “cinema” is constantly being re-evaluated. Unlike a general understanding of cinema as apparatus, place or specific medium, I conceive cinema as a text that constantly needs to be interpreted and supplemented
Regazzoni, Simone. "Jacques Derrida e la decostruzione del politico". Paris 8, 2005. http://www.theses.fr/2005PA082526.
The deconstruction of the political in the works of J. D. Is conceived of as an answer to a process of deconstruction that is going on within the things themselves. This answer is articulated as a destabilization of the conceptual legacy of the onto-theological-political tradition, which starting from Plato has thought of the political as a space of the communitarian and sovereign One. We have tried to reconstruct the articulation of this answer, which deals with the concepts of law, life, sovereignty, democracy, by taking into account the whole derridian corpus. Indeed, we think that it is not possible to understand the scope of the deconstruction of the political without analyzing the deconstructing work carried out on the philosophical legacy and the logo-centric structure. From a methodological standpoint, our task has been performed according to three different ways of reading: the commentary, the active interpretation and the scrutiny of some specific themes
Thorsteinsson, Björn. "La question de la justice chez Jacques Derrida". Paris 8, 2005. http://www.theses.fr/2005PA082488.
In a lecture given in 1989, Jacques Derrida made the somewhat surprising declaration that “deconstruction is justice”. The main objective of the thesis in question can be formulated as the elucidation of this equivalence. Thus defined, the task turned out to demand, first, a detailed study of what is called, in Derrida's writings, “différance”; second, an analysis of “deconstruction”; third, a re-enactment of the intimate and complex relation between Derrida and philosophy, particularly in its systematic and dialectic form; and lastly, an investigation into the context in which the relation between deconstruction and justice appears. This final phase of the exposition turned out to necessitate a thorough investigation of the difference between Derrida and Heidegger with regard to temporality, the focal point of which is the so-called disjointure of time – without which there would be no justice
Rezende, de Souza Pinto Gabriel. "Droit et Normativité chez Jacques Derrida". Electronic Thesis or Diss., Paris 8, 2018. http://www.theses.fr/2018PA080114.
Since the late 1980s, there has been a disagreement among Derrida scholars as to whether or not there is an « ethical turn » in his philosophy. Although the meanings of the terms « ethical » and « turn » still divide commentators, partisans of both camps presuppose one thing: Derrida cannot be a normativist.This dissertation challenges the tacit consensus among these commentators, namely, that Derrida’s philosophy is opposed to « norms ». Rejecting the distinction between a « young » and a « late » Derrida, we show that the problem of normativity has been correlated with the deconstruction of logocentrism since his earliest works. The fact that Western metaphysics has always repressed writing and the logic of the trace determines a particular configuration of the field of practical philosophy. Within this framework, normative truth is conceived as the intimacy of a commanding voice: we call this logonomocentrism. Just as Derrida argues that « archi-writing » is the condition of possibility of all speech — and appearance in general — we argue that « archi-law » is the condition of possibility of normativity. Hence, « writing » and « law » share a common destiny. The traditional elements used to describe, in metaphysical terms, the secondarity (and submission) of law and writing allow us to think an excess that puts into motion the field of practical philosophy : « distance », « supplement », « representation », but also « institution », « arbitrary », « violence » and « technique »
Rocha, Alvarez Delmiro. "Mort du dynaste : la contamination itérable du propre chez Jacques Derrida". Lille 3, 2010. http://www.theses.fr/2010LIL30046.
This doctoral dissertation proposes the division of sovereignty. From its divided beginning and principal, this dissertation constitutes by itself a division of sovereignty. First division : the idea of sovereignty insofar as one and indivisible, that hearkens back at least to the conception of the modern State, loses this border, this historical division, as soon as one sees that sovereignty, the sovereignty, has always been one and indivisible because precisely of its theologico-political bases. For the sovereignty has never constituted one sovereignty, but, more precisely, the sovereignty that is one. We will present the division of sovereignty as the preponderance of the indefinite article, a, that divides and is shared, is shorn. Second division : auto-immunity of sovereignty. It is through the division of dynasties that sovereignty is divided. The appropriation of what is proper will produce the death of the dynast. In spite of all, the ex-appropriation will remain as a sovereignty of division. Third division : it is through the lexicon of sovereignty that we will develop, in parallel fashion, this other fable that pretends that there is a division of the "Derridian" corpus "properly" speaking. Fourth division : once we will have unmasked, verily demystified, a certain fashion of conceiving sovereignty, that itself affirmed the unity and the indivisibility of itself, we will propose an effective, a real, division of sovereignty that we will, therefore, very precisely, expose starting with the university, as well as propose for the university. A sovereignty without condition for the university opposes and constitutes an obstacle for the unconditionality of sovereignty
Contreras, Guala Carlos. "Éthique et politique dans l'œuvre de Jacques Derrida". Paris 8, 2008. http://octaviana.fr/document/145514641#?c=0&m=0&s=0&cv=0.
Many authors agree that the second half of the 20th century seemed to be marked by a certain disinterest in the ethical and political arenas. That is why Deconstruction has been accused of immorality and irresponsibility. However, when reading Derrida's Deconstruction texts, some specialists have attempted to discover and reveal the relationships he established between politics, ethics, and Deconstruction. These specialists claim that there is an ethical and political turn in Derrida's work. In this thesis, we propose, firstly, that both politics and ethics are present in Derrida's work. Secondly, that if there are any ethical and political implications in Derrida's writings, they would not constitute a turn but an evolution of a way of thinking actively involved in ethical and political aporias. In the first part, we present the difficulties any reader might encounter when reading Derrida. The second part is devoted to the development of concepts such as responsibility, decision, justice and what we call Deconstruction's aporetic structure. The third part deals with the relationship between literature and democracy. In the fourth part, we examine the notion of involvement through the concepts of responsibility, decision, and Derrida's opinions about the mass media. Finally, we explore the concepts of ethics and politics and also the necessity for Deconstruction when thinking about the conditions of possibility and impossibility of those concepts
Muchos autores coinciden al afirmar que la segunda mitad del siglo recién pasado aparece marcada por la percepción de cierta despreocupación por el ámbito ético y político. Es así que la desconstrucción ha sido acusada de inmoralismo e irresponsabilidad. Sin embargo, también ha habido ciertos lectores que abordan directamente las relaciones entre política, ética y desconstrucción con el propósito de revelar y exponer dichas relaciones. En general, estos últimos lectores postulan que habría un ethical and political turn en la obra derrideana. Frente a estos problemas se pretende plantear, por una parte, que el problema de lo político y lo ético en la obra de Jacques Derrida está presente y, por otra parte, que, en efecto, si hay implicancias ético-políticas en los escritos derrideanos, éstas no se configurarían como un turn, sino que se trataría más bien de la evolución de un pensamiento comprometido en las aporías de lo ético-político. La Primera Parte se presentan las dificultades que plantea la escritura de Jacques Derrida ante cualquier lector que se aventure en sus textos. La Segunda Parte está consagrada al desarrollo de las nociones de responsabilidad, decisión, justicia y de lo que llamaremos estructura aporética de la desconstrucción. La Tercera Parte se ocupa de la relación entre la literatura y la democracia. La Cuarta Parte hará un examen de la noción de compromiso a través de una revisión de los conceptos de responsabilidad, decisión, y de las opiniones de Derrida a propósito de los media. Por último, intentamos una aproximación a los conceptos de ética y política, y a la necesidad de la desconstrucción para poder pensar las condiciones de posibilidad – y de imposibilidad –, de dichos conceptos
Biset, Emmanuel. "Violencia, justicia y política : una lectura de Jacques Derrida". Paris 8, 2009. http://www.theses.fr/2009PA083079.
The object of this writing presents an hypothesis of lecture of Jacques Derrida philosophy. Because of this, the text presents the general result of a major investigation about Derrida's reading. This has two objectives: first, to point out the different shades that Derrida'philosophy acquires throughout time; second, to show that this shades suggest a tension between an irreductible violence and a irreductible hospitality; third, insert this tension inside specific discourse tradition: the political philosophy
Ruff, Pierre-Yves. "Derrida, l'ecriture et la place de l'autre". Université Marc Bloch (Strasbourg) (1971-2008), 1996. http://www.theses.fr/1996STR20053.
This thesis is, first of all, a journey through or across derrida's work. Its purpose is not to untangle the "content" of the thought signed derrida. It aims rather - in so much as it is possible - to work within derrida's text in the same way he himself approaches the works that he reads. This implies a close attention to writing and in this particular case demands an approximate if at times vertiginous textual mimesis. Two chapters themselves divided into paragraphs alone form the uncommun architecture of the thesis. The first one leads from the "end of the book" to the blurring which becomes apparent under the erasure; the second one attempts a new departure under the title of the call and leads to the imminent arrival of the other. Thus, these two chapters are the two curved slopes of a single journey, which is above all the mark of a recognition, the unsigned sign of a trajectory accomplished in the pas of the other derrida
Bovo, Elena. "La pensée d'autrui chez Emmanuel Levinas et Jacques Derrida". Paris 12, 2002. http://www.theses.fr/2002PA120039.
It is from a dialogue with the husserlien and the heiddegerien phenomenology that Lévinas and Derrida elaborate their concept of the identity of the self. It is a precarious identity, which is at the same time made possible and threatened by the other. The first part of the thesis throws light on the problematic and fertile points implicated in the husserlien reflection of otherness, as well as on the roots of some levinasien concepts in this reflection. In the second part, a special attention is given to the development and the change of levinasien conception of the self and the other, in the texts posterior to Totalité et Infini. In these texts, a new concept of death is introduced as well. In the third part, this concept of death, which explicitly opposes the heideggerien concept of death, is compared with derridien reflection of impossible mourning, a reflection that examines the consequences of the loss of the other for the constitution of the self
Libros sobre el tema "Derrida, Jacques (1930-2004) – Cinéma":
Brunette, Peter. Screen/play: Derrida and film theory. Princeton, N.J: Princeton University Press, 1989.
Bennington, Geoffrey. Jacques Derrida. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1993.
Bennington, Geoffrey. Jacques Derrida. [Paris]: Seuil, 1991.
Norris, Christopher. Derrida. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press, 1987.
Cixous, Hélène. Insister of Jacques Derrida. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2007.
Smith, James K. A. Jacques Derrida: Live theory. New York: Continuum, 2005.
Baross, Zsuzsa. Posthumously, for Jacques Derrida. Brighton: Sussex Academic Press, 2011.
Phillips, John William. Derrida now: Current perspectives in Derrida studies. Malden, MA: Derrida Now, 2016.
O'Connor, Patrick. Derrida: Profanations. London: Continuum, 2010.
1976-, Reynolds Jack y Roffe Jonathan, eds. Understanding Derrida. New York: Continuum, 2004.
Capítulos de libros sobre el tema "Derrida, Jacques (1930-2004) – Cinéma":
Hennings, Terri J. "Jacques Derrida (1930–2004)". En Handbook of Phenomenological Aesthetics, 71–74. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 2009. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2471-8_14.
Voigt, Rüdiger. "Jacques Derrida (1930–2004)". En Staatsdenken, 396–401. Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.5771/9783845250939-396.
Borradori, Giovanna. "Jacques Derrida (1930–2004)". En The Cambridge Habermas Lexicon, 515–18. Cambridge University Press, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/9781316771303.140.
Pirktina, Lasma. "Jacques Derrida (1930–2004)". En Das Ereignis, 97–121. Verlag Karl Alber, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.5771/9783495820544-97.
Crockett, Clayton. "Jacques Derrida (1930–2004)". En Religion and European Philosophy, 383–95. Routledge, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781315642253-33.
Casser, Joan. "Jacques Derrida (1930–2004)". En Structures of Language: Notes Towards a Systematic Investigation, 188–206. BRILL, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/9789004520783_014.
Hart, Kevin. "40. Jacques Derrida (1930-2004)". En Modern European Criticism and Theory, 315–24. Edinburgh University Press, 2006. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/9780748626793-041.
"5. Trembling Jacques Derrida (1930–2004)". En Last Works, 110–39. Yale University Press, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.12987/9780300231427-007.