Literatura académica sobre el tema "Copyright Amendment (Moral Rights) Act"
Crea una cita precisa en los estilos APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard y otros
Consulte las listas temáticas de artículos, libros, tesis, actas de conferencias y otras fuentes académicas sobre el tema "Copyright Amendment (Moral Rights) Act".
Junto a cada fuente en la lista de referencias hay un botón "Agregar a la bibliografía". Pulsa este botón, y generaremos automáticamente la referencia bibliográfica para la obra elegida en el estilo de cita que necesites: APA, MLA, Harvard, Vancouver, Chicago, etc.
También puede descargar el texto completo de la publicación académica en formato pdf y leer en línea su resumen siempre que esté disponible en los metadatos.
Artículos de revistas sobre el tema "Copyright Amendment (Moral Rights) Act"
Shaffer, Roberta I. "The Artist's Case for Droit Moral and Droit de Suite Continues". International Journal of Legal Information 15, n.º 1-2 (abril de 1987): 1–9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0731126500020412.
Texto completoPutranti, Deslaely. "Copyright Protection in Indonesia: Study of Amendment of Act Number 28 of 2014 on Copyright". Melayunesia Law 2, n.º 1 (10 de julio de 2018): 25. http://dx.doi.org/10.30652/ml.v2i1.5401.
Texto completoYu, Peter K. "Moral Rights 2.0". 2013 Fall Intellectual Property Symposium Articles 1, n.º 4 (marzo de 2014): 873–900. http://dx.doi.org/10.37419/lr.v1.i4.3.
Texto completoDrobiazko, Volodymyr. "Protection of the rights of performers in accordance with German law". Theory and Practice of Intellectual Property, n.º 4 (19 de octubre de 2022): 24–29. http://dx.doi.org/10.33731/42022.265846.
Texto completoClark, Charles. "The UK Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988: moral rights". Learned Publishing 3, n.º 2 (1 de enero de 1990): 92–94. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/leap/30031.
Texto completoOlubiyi, Ifeoluwa A. y Desmond O. Oriakhogba. "Implications of the Nigerian Broadcasting Code on Broadcast Copyright and Competition". GRUR International 70, n.º 7 (4 de enero de 2021): 644–55. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/grurint/ikaa194.
Texto completoCantatore, Francina y Jane Johnston. "Moral Rights: Exploring the Myths, Meanings and Misunderstandings in Australian Copyright Law". Deakin Law Review 21, n.º 1 (23 de febrero de 2018): 71. http://dx.doi.org/10.21153/dlr2016vol21no1art727.
Texto completoMujuzi, Jamil Ddamulira. "Prosecuting and punishing copyright infringements in South Africa: A comment on the Copyright Amendment Bill, B13B-2017". South African Journal of Criminal Justice 33, n.º 3 (2020): 731–51. http://dx.doi.org/10.47348/sacj/v33/i3a11.
Texto completoJudge, Elizabeth F. y Saleh Al-Sharieh. "Join the Club: The Implications of the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement's Enforcement Measures for Canadian Copyright Law". Alberta Law Review 49, n.º 3 (1 de marzo de 2012): 677. http://dx.doi.org/10.29173/alr113.
Texto completoWood, Nicholas Stuart. "Protecting Creativity: Why Moral Rights Should be Extended to Sound Recordings under New Zealand Copyright Law". Victoria University of Wellington Law Review 32, n.º 1 (5 de marzo de 2001): 163. http://dx.doi.org/10.26686/vuwlr.v32i1.5899.
Texto completoTesis sobre el tema "Copyright Amendment (Moral Rights) Act"
Banks, Catherine y n/a. "Lost in Translation: A History of Moral Rights in Australian Law". Griffith University. Griffith Law School, 2005. http://www4.gu.edu.au:8080/adt-root/public/adt-QGU20061006.114720.
Texto completoBanks, Catherine. "Lost in Translation: A History of Moral Rights in Australian Law". Thesis, Griffith University, 2005. http://hdl.handle.net/10072/365849.
Texto completoThesis (PhD Doctorate)
Doctor of Philosophy (PhD)
Griffith Law School
Full Text
Libros sobre el tema "Copyright Amendment (Moral Rights) Act"
United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on the Judiciary. Subcommittee on Patents, Copyrights, and Trademarks. Visual Artists Rights Amendment of 1986: Hearing before the Subcommittee on Patents, Copyrights, and Trademarks of the Committee on the Judiciary, United States Senate, Ninety-ninth Congress, second session, on S. 2796 ... New York, NY, November 18, 1986. Washington: U.S. G.P.O., 1987.
Buscar texto completoUnited States. Congress. Senate. Committee on the Judiciary. Subcommittee on Patents, Copyrights, and Trademarks. Visual Artists Rights Amendment of 1986: Hearing before the Subcommittee on Patents, Copyrights, and Trademarks of the Committee on the Judiciary, United States Senate, Ninety-ninth Congress, second session, on S. 2796 ... New York, NY, November 18, 1986. Washington: U.S. G.P.O., 1987.
Buscar texto completoUnited States. Congress. Senate. Committee on the Judiciary. Subcommittee on Patents, Copyrights, and Trademarks. Visual Artists Rights Amendment of 1986: Hearing before the Subcommittee on Patents, Copyrights, and Trademarks of the Committee on the Judiciary, United States Senate, Ninety-ninth Congress, second session, on S. 2796 ... New York, NY, November 18, 1986. Washington: U.S. G.P.O., 1987.
Buscar texto completoLal, Nathuni. Lal's commentary on the Copyright Act, 1957 (Act No. 14 of 1957): With the Copyright (Amendment) Act, 2012 (Act no. 27 of 2012), The Copyrights rules, 2013 & Neighbouring Rights, also International Copyrighr Order, 1999. 5a ed. New Delhi: Delhi Law House, 2013.
Buscar texto completoUnited, States Congress House Committee on the Judiciary Subcommittee on Courts Intellectual Property and the Administration of Justice. Visual Artists Rights Act of 1989: Hearing before the Subcommittee on Courts, Intellectual Property, and the Administration of Justice of the Committee on the Judiciary, House of Representatives, One Hundred First Congress, first session, on H.R. 2690 ... October 18, 1989. Washington: U.S. G.P.O., 1990.
Buscar texto completoUnited States. Congress. Senate. Committee on the Judiciary. Subcommittee on Patents, Copyrights, and Trademarks. Visual Artists Rights Act of 1987: Hearing before the Subcomittee on Patents, Copyrights, and Trademarks of the Committee on the Judiciary, United States Senate, One Hundredth Congress, first session, on S. 1619 ... December 3, 1987. Washington: U.S. G.P.O., 1988.
Buscar texto completoUnited, States Congress House Committee on the Judiciary Subcommittee on Courts Civil Liberties and the Administration of Justice. Visual Artists Rights Act of 1987: Hearing before the Subcommittee on Courts, Civil Liberties, and the Administration of Justice of the Committee on the Judiciary, House of Representatives, One Hundredth Congress, second session on H.R. 3221 ... June 9, 1988. Washington: U.S. G.P.O., 1989.
Buscar texto completoLal, Nathuni. Lal's commentary on the Copyright Act, 1957 (Act 14 of 1957): With the Copyright Rules, 1958 & neighbouring rights, also International Copyright Order, 1999 alongwith Patent (Amendment) Rules, 2006, the Intellectual Property Appellate Board (Procedure) Rules, 2003, Trade Mark Rules, 2002 together with law relating to ownership of copyright and the rights of the owners, international copyright infringement of copyright, registration of copyrights, making of sound recording's, importation of infringing copies with latest case laws. 4a ed. Delhi: Delhi Law House, 2006.
Buscar texto completoSnow, Ned. Intellectual Property and Immorality. Oxford University Press, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197614402.001.0001.
Texto completoMarcus, Smith y Leslie Nico. Part III Transfers in Particular Contexts, 20 Transfer of Intellectual Property. Oxford University Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/law/9780198748434.003.0020.
Texto completoCapítulos de libros sobre el tema "Copyright Amendment (Moral Rights) Act"
Bently, L., B. Sherman, D. Gangjee y P. Johnson. "10. Moral rights". En Intellectual Property Law. Oxford University Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198769958.003.0010.
Texto completoRicketson, Sam y Jane C. Ginsburg. "The Rights Protected by the Convention: General Introduction; Moral Rights (Article 6bis)". En International Copyright and Neighbouring Rights, 577–614. Oxford University Press, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198801986.003.0010.
Texto completoKarapapa, Stavroula y Luke McDonagh. "6. Moral rights". En Intellectual Property Law, 131–48. Oxford University Press, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198747697.003.0006.
Texto completoBently, L., B. Sherman, D. Gangjee y P. Johnson. "10. Moral Rights". En Intellectual Property Law, 303–22. Oxford University Press, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198869917.003.0010.
Texto completoBate, Stephen y Gervase de Wilde. "Copyright, Moral Rights, and the Right to One’s Image". En Tugendhat and Christie: The Law of Privacy and The Media. Oxford University Press, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199685745.003.0012.
Texto completoDivan, Shyam y Armin Rosencranz. "Constitutional Provisions". En Environmental Law and Policy in India, 46—C3.N107. 3a ed. Oxford University PressOxford, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192865458.003.0003.
Texto completoSood, Ekta y Vibhuti Nakta. "Cybersquatting". En Handbook of Research on Cyber Law, Data Protection, and Privacy, 120–36. IGI Global, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-8641-9.ch008.
Texto completo"construing the Berne Convention to say that all that was required was a positive right to claim authorship which the author may exercise as he wishes. Normally this will be by placing his name on copies of the work. The Green Paper noted that s 43 of the 1956 Act provided a useful remedy where the plaintiff is not a professional writer and could not therefore recover damages for loss of goodwill in a passing off action; the provision survives as s 84 of the 1988 Act. The Berne Convention also contains some latitude as to the right of integrity since Article 6 bis requires a right to object in cases only where actions in relation to an author’s work would be prejudicial to his honour or reputation. The government agreed with Whitford that exceptions such as the permitting of reasonable modifications (as in the Netherlands Copyright Act) should be made and that they would be in accordance with the Berne Convention. The Green Paper therefore proposed that the legislation should provide that no change should be made in any literary, dramatic, musical, artistic or cinematographic work without the author’s consent, with the exception of changes to which the author could not in good faith refuse consent. The Act embraces this principle by implication, not expressly, as it adopts the wording of the Berne Convention rather than that of the Green Paper. The Green Paper went on to propose that the rights would be exerciseable only by the author or, after his death, by his personal representative. Contravention of the rights would be actionable as a breach of statutory duty. The rights would not be assignable. However, the author would be permitted to waive his moral rights and such waiver would be binding on his successors in title. The moral rights would exist for the same period as economic rights. The White Paper promised legislation along the lines foreshadowed in the Green Paper, noting that while Whitford had doubted whether UK law had complied with the Brussels text of the Berne Convention, there was no doubt that amendment of the law was necessary to comply with the Paris text. Chapter 4 of the Act sets out the new rights. The rights to be protected are the minimum required to be protected by Berne – paternity and integrity. There is no equivalent to the French droit de divulgation (the right to control circulation of a work prior to its being completed for publication), the droit d’accès (mainly of artists to their paintings after sale), the droit de repentir (the right of withdrawal after publication, subject in German law to the payment of compensation to the publisher, of a work of which its author no longer approves). Nor is there a right to reacquire a work of which the author has disposed – such as Graham Sutherland might have found useful in the case of his portrait of Churchill – or a right of publication. The possibility of". En Sourcebook on Intellectual Property Law, 488. Routledge-Cavendish, 1997. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781843142928-70.
Texto completo