Literatura académica sobre el tema "Cohabitation - Law"
Crea una cita precisa en los estilos APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard y otros
Consulte las listas temáticas de artículos, libros, tesis, actas de conferencias y otras fuentes académicas sobre el tema "Cohabitation - Law".
Junto a cada fuente en la lista de referencias hay un botón "Agregar a la bibliografía". Pulsa este botón, y generaremos automáticamente la referencia bibliográfica para la obra elegida en el estilo de cita que necesites: APA, MLA, Harvard, Vancouver, Chicago, etc.
También puede descargar el texto completo de la publicación académica en formato pdf y leer en línea su resumen siempre que esté disponible en los metadatos.
Artículos de revistas sobre el tema "Cohabitation - Law"
Wudarski, Arkadiusz. "The concept of de facto relationships in Poland". Studia Universitatis Moldaviae. Seria Stiinte Sociale, n.º 3 (junio de 2023): 70–75. http://dx.doi.org/10.59295/sum3(163)2023_08.
Texto completoSeff, Monica A. "Cohabitation and the Law". Marriage & Family Review 21, n.º 3-4 (12 de julio de 1995): 141–68. http://dx.doi.org/10.1300/j002v21n03_08.
Texto completoBouchard, Geneviéve. "Cohabitation versus Marriage". Journal of Divorce & Remarriage 46, n.º 1-2 (31 de agosto de 2006): 107–17. http://dx.doi.org/10.1300/j087v46n01_06.
Texto completoLeckey, Robert. "Cohabitation, Law Reform, and the Litigants". International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family 31, n.º 2 (22 de mayo de 2017): 131–46. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/lawfam/ebx002.
Texto completoWong, Simone. "Cohabitation and the Law Commission’s Project". Feminist Legal Studies 14, n.º 2 (25 de agosto de 2006): 145–66. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10691-006-9025-y.
Texto completoBarlow, Anne. "Cohabitation Law Reform – Messages From Research". Feminist Legal Studies 14, n.º 2 (9 de septiembre de 2006): 167–80. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10691-006-9026-x.
Texto completoLeckey, Robert. "Cohabitation and Comparative Method". Modern Law Review 72, n.º 1 (enero de 2009): 48–72. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2230.2009.00733.x.
Texto completoKabza, Ewa. "Three Different Legal Attitudes Towards Non-Marital Cohabitation in Europe". Comparative Law Review 27 (22 de diciembre de 2021): 255–74. http://dx.doi.org/10.12775/clr.2021.010.
Texto completoMultazam, Syauqi y M. Mujab. "Delik Samen Leven Dalam KUHP Baru Perspektif Fikih". Syariah: Journal of Fiqh Studies 1, n.º 2 (3 de diciembre de 2023): 169–86. http://dx.doi.org/10.61570/syariah.v1i2.35.
Texto completoLeckey, Robert. "Cohabitation, female sacrifice, and judge-made law". Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law 41, n.º 1 (14 de diciembre de 2018): 72–91. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09649069.2019.1554794.
Texto completoTesis sobre el tema "Cohabitation - Law"
Lind, Göran. "Common law marriage : a legal institution for cohabitation /". New York [u.a.] : Oxford Univ. Press, 2008. http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&doc_number=016728851&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA.
Texto completoKelly, Sue. "Ruling on cohabitation : a critical study of the cohabitation rule in UK social security law". Thesis, University of Edinburgh, 2007. http://hdl.handle.net/1842/29192.
Texto completoBurton, Frances Rosemary. "Formalised cohabitation : a critical and comparative study of an element of English law in a normative regime". Thesis, Liverpool John Moores University, 2016. http://researchonline.ljmu.ac.uk/4446/.
Texto completoDamons, Nikita Theresa. "Non-formalised cohabitation : does the Swedish model of statutory regulation provide a solution for South Africa?" Thesis, University of the Western Cape, 2015. http://hdl.handle.net/11394/5159.
Texto completoSouth Africa has come a long way from the rigid family structures which existed in the past. This is demonstrated by the recognition afforded to couples in same-sex relationships as well as those in customary marriages. Proposals have also been set forth regarding law reform to protect the rights and interests of those involved in domestic partnerships. The Domestic Partnership Bill was promulgated in 2008 but to date has not been passed into law. The ensuing consequence is that cohabitation relationships are therefore self-regulated. This relationship has no legal status as a union in South Africa. The court have, however, recognised that a universal partnership could be established if certain criteria are met. Furthermore, heterosexual couples are now also recognised as a "dependant" in actions against the Road Accident Fund for loss of support as a result of death of the breadwinner. Unlike South Africa, cohabitation in Sweden is regulated by a dedicated law called the Cohabitees Act 2003. The Act provides comprehensive protection than that afforded to cohabitants in South Africa. It offers a clear definition of cohabitation and criteria in order to qualify as a cohabitee. The Act, further, regulates the proprietary consequences of entering into such a relationship and the effects of termination. Cohabitation has status as a legal union in Sweden. My research will deal with non-formalised cohabitation and a comparison shall be made between the current systems in South Africa and Sweden. My work will suggest that the statutory model of regulation in Sweden may provide a solution for South Africa. In South Africa, cohabiting couples are not afforded the same rights as married couples. In contrast, married couples are afforded rights automatically as a result of the institution. Unmarried partners have no automatic duty of support, to acquire an interest each other's separate property and a cohabitee may not inherit intestate from the estate in the event of death of one of the partners. In Sweden, intimate relationships are treated similarly to married relationships, with the law applying the principle of "neutrality" with regard to its family laws. Several cases have emerged recently in South Africa which will provide a clearer understanding of the current state of the law. The reason for undertaking this study is to illustrate the changing mores of society and the necessity of the law to keep up with these values. As South Africa has not yet passed its domestic partnership law it may be useful to compare it to Sweden in order provide South Africa with a possibly better approach. Sweden has passed laws on cohabitation and these have been in place for years. Thus we might still learn from them prior to our law being passed. Legislative and judicial activity have soared recently and it may be beneficial to look at another jurisdiction more carefully. These observations will be undertaken more comprehensively in the body of the thesis.
Aguilar, Llanos Benjamín. "A view from Family Law and Inheritance Law, concerning the right of residence of the surviving spouse or survivor is the case of the cohabitation". IUS ET VERITAS, 2016. http://repositorio.pucp.edu.pe/index/handle/123456789/123036.
Texto completoEl presente artículo versa sobre el patrimonio familiar y como un hecho natural como la muerte no culmina las relaciones jurídicas que han dado lugar al patrimonio que formó, sino que ésta trasciende al sujeto, y por ello el Derecho regula la transmisión de los bienes derechos y obligaciones de la persona fallecida a favor de los que resulten sus sucesores. Es decir, la muerte genera consecuencias jurídicas.
Garland, Fae Sinead. "Valuing domestic contributions : a search for a solution for family law". Thesis, University of Exeter, 2012. http://hdl.handle.net/10871/10201.
Texto completoLam, Chi-wai Michael y 林智偉. "Domestic and Cohabitation Relationships Violence Ordinance: a piece of work in progress or the ultimatesolution for gay victims?" Thesis, The University of Hong Kong (Pokfulam, Hong Kong), 2012. http://hub.hku.hk/bib/B5053421X.
Texto completopublished_or_final_version
Law
Master
Master of Philosophy
Rochat, Charlotte. "L'amitié en droit privé". Thesis, Aix-Marseille, 2015. http://www.theses.fr/2015AIXM1080.
Texto completoFriendship is one of the most important social institutions : it binds society together. Yet, we could wonder what the law has to do with it. It seems impossible to define friendship, and the law needs a definition to identify a relationship. However, private law does not ignore friendship. The law copes with it about partiality, about conflicts of interests and about several misdeneanors. Law fears friendship as it may change the balance of interests protected by law. It also happens in Contract law, when friendship is the reason of binding. On the other side, law has to protect friendship, as it is important for the personal development. Friendship is included in protection of privacy by the European Court of Human Right. Friendship is also protected because it can be useful to take care for individual interests, especially when family collapses. Thus, a friend can give an organ to save his friend, he can relay his friend’s will when he is unabled. Friendship do matter in Private Law, even if it cannot be precisely defined. It could even have more legal attention in the future. The real point of the study is to show how the law can deal with this lack of legal definition, and manage to apprehend friendship
Wu, Huijing. "Living apart together (LAT) in older adulthood". Bowling Green State University / OhioLINK, 2019. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=bgsu1566408515111424.
Texto completoEscudey, Gaëtan. "Le couple en droit international privé : contribution à l’adaptation méthodologique du droit international privé du couple". Thesis, Bordeaux, 2016. http://www.theses.fr/2016BORD0301/document.
Texto completoThe liberal influence in Family Law and the rise of individualist ideology have led to a multiplication of conjugal life forms and considerably increased the diversity of laws and methods applicable to couples in International Private Law. To analyse couples under International Private Law leads us to rethink the International Private Law of the Couple. Deconstructing this subject brings to light the current non-adaptation of the classic conflict of laws method and the insufficiency of the recognition approach. In fact, current International Private Law as it pertains to couples neither guarantees the international recognition of theconjugal bond nor ensures a coherent legal treatment of legal problems faced by international couples. It is therefore necessary to examine a possible methodological evolution of thesubject. This study aims to demonstrate that it is possible to adapt the classic conflict of lawsmethod by taking into account the objectives of the recognition approach whilst founding iton the lex auctoritas rule. This would not only bring better coherence to International Private Law of the Couple but it would also assure a real legal stability for international conjugal relationships
Libros sobre el tema "Cohabitation - Law"
1957-, Craig Jane y Pearson Philippa, eds. Cohabitation law and precedents. Andover, Hampshire: Sweet & Maxwell, 2000.
Buscar texto completoThe law relating to cohabitation. 2a ed. London: Sweet & Maxwell, 1988.
Buscar texto completoWood, Helen. Cohabitation: Law, practice and precedents. 3a ed. Bristol: Family Law, 2005.
Buscar texto completoParry, Martin L. The law relating to cohabitation. 3a ed. London: Sweet & Maxwell, 1993.
Buscar texto completoWood, Helen. Cohabitation: Law, practice and precedents. Bristol: Family Law, 2015.
Buscar texto completoCohabitation: Law, practice and precedents. 4a ed. Bristol: Family Law/Jordan Pub., 2009.
Buscar texto completoH, Holland Winifred y Stalbecker Barbro E, eds. Cohabitation: The law in Canada. Toronto: Carswell, 1990.
Buscar texto completoCohabitation: Law, practice and precedents. 5a ed. Bristol: Family Law/Jordan Pub., 2012.
Buscar texto completoDenzil, Lush, Bishop, David, T.E.P. y Lush Denzil, eds. Cohabitation: Law, practice and precedents. 2a ed. Bristol [England]: Family Law, 2001.
Buscar texto completoAlison, Diduck, ed. Marriage and cohabitation. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2008.
Buscar texto completoCapítulos de libros sobre el tema "Cohabitation - Law"
Standley, Kate. "Cohabitation". En Family Law, 283–91. London: Macmillan Education UK, 1993. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-13082-5_17.
Texto completoDavies, Paula y Paven Basuita. "Cohabitation". En Family Law, 62–75. London: Macmillan Education UK, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-57552-4_3.
Texto completoHerring, Jonathan, Rebecca Probert y Stephen Gilmore. "Cohabitation". En Great Debates in Family Law, 176–91. London: Macmillan Education UK, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-48157-3_8.
Texto completoCowan, David, Lorna Fox O’Mahony y Neil Cobb. "Cohabitation: Rights to the Home". En Great Debates in Land Law, 222–46. London: Macmillan Education UK, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-48166-5_11.
Texto completoStandley, Kate. "The Legal Consequences of Marriage and Cohabitation". En Family Law, 26–32. London: Macmillan Education UK, 1997. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-14655-0_3.
Texto completoCarter, Julia y Simon Duncan. "Inventing Tradition: Cohabitation and Common Law Marriage". En Reinventing Couples, 79–114. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-58961-3_4.
Texto completoParker, Stephen. "The New Family Law". En Informal Marriage, Cohabitation and the Law 1750–1989, 126–57. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 1990. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-09834-7_6.
Texto completoParker, Stephen. "Marriage and the Law 1754–1927: The State Retreats?" En Informal Marriage, Cohabitation and the Law 1750–1989, 48–95. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 1990. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-09834-7_4.
Texto completoParker, Stephen. "Introduction". En Informal Marriage, Cohabitation and the Law 1750–1989, 1–8. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 1990. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-09834-7_1.
Texto completoParker, Stephen. "Family and Marriage in the Mid-Eighteenth Century". En Informal Marriage, Cohabitation and the Law 1750–1989, 9–28. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 1990. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-09834-7_2.
Texto completoActas de conferencias sobre el tema "Cohabitation - Law"
Kotková, Petra y Milan Palásek. "The Right to Family Life in the Case Law of the European Court of Human Rights". En COFOLA 2021. Brno: Masaryk University Press, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.5817/cz.muni.p210-9981-2021-2.
Texto completoFeka, Mikhael, Adji Samekto y Umi Rozah. "Criminalization of Cohabitation in the Perspective of Criminal Law Reform". En Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Law, Economics and Governance, IWLEG 2022, 27 July 2022, Semarang, Indonesia. EAI, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.4108/eai.27-7-2022.2326261.
Texto completoGarayová, Lilla. "Cohabitation in the Slovak Republic: Myth or Reality?" En COFOLA 2021. Brno: Masaryk University Press, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.5817/cz.muni.p210-9981-2021-1.
Texto completoZatloukalová, Lucie. "Principles of European Family Law as an Inspiration for Law Makers in Europe". En COFOLA 2021. Brno: Masaryk University Press, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.5817/cz.muni.p210-9981-2021-5.
Texto completoLarisa, Argentova y Argentova Tatiana. "Premarital Cohabitation of Young People. Features of Interpersonal Relations in Trial Common-Law Marriage". En International Conference on the Theory and Practice of Personality Formation in Modern Society (ICTPPFMS 2018). Paris, France: Atlantis Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.2991/ictppfms-18.2018.12.
Texto completoKotroušová, Denisa. "Nesezdané soužití v České republice". En Naděje právní vědy 2022. University of West Bohemia, Czech Republic, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.24132/zcu.nadeje.2022.254-265.
Texto completoГабазов, Тимур Султанович. "SYMBIOTIC-ORIENTED MARRIAGE IN THE CHECHEN: CONCEPT AND REASONS FOR CONCLUSION". En Социально-экономические и гуманитарные науки: сборник избранных статей по материалам Международной научной конференции (Санкт-Петербург, Август 2020). Crossref, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.37539/seh292.2020.87.12.003.
Texto completoVáclavová, Veronika. "Slovenská republika ako právny štát s ohľadom na garanciu ľudských práv". En Naděje právní vědy 2022. University of West Bohemia, Czech Republic, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.24132/zcu.nadeje.2022.745-750.
Texto completoVlašković, Veljko. "Pravni značaj biomedicinske usluge čuvanja reproduktivnih ćelija maloletnog lica". En XVI Majsko savetovanje. University of Kragujevac, Faculty of Law, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.46793/upk20.451v.
Texto completoVlašković, Veljko. "Pravni značaj biomedicinske usluge čuvanja reproduktivnih ćelija maloletnog lica". En XVI Majsko savetovanje. University of Kragujevac, Faculty of Law, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.46793/upk20.451v.
Texto completoInformes sobre el tema "Cohabitation - Law"
Bacharach, Eran, W. Ian Lipkin y Avigdor Eldar. Identification of the etiological agent of tilapia disease in the Lake of Galillee. United States Department of Agriculture, enero de 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.32747/2013.7597932.bard.
Texto completo