Literatura académica sobre el tema "Civil law – australia – interpretation and construction"
Crea una cita precisa en los estilos APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard y otros
Consulte las listas temáticas de artículos, libros, tesis, actas de conferencias y otras fuentes académicas sobre el tema "Civil law – australia – interpretation and construction".
Junto a cada fuente en la lista de referencias hay un botón "Agregar a la bibliografía". Pulsa este botón, y generaremos automáticamente la referencia bibliográfica para la obra elegida en el estilo de cita que necesites: APA, MLA, Harvard, Vancouver, Chicago, etc.
También puede descargar el texto completo de la publicación académica en formato pdf y leer en línea su resumen siempre que esté disponible en los metadatos.
Artículos de revistas sobre el tema "Civil law – australia – interpretation and construction"
Anderssen, Diana. "Indigenous Australia and the pre-legal society in HLA Hart’s The Concept of Law". Journal of Legal Philosophy 48, n.º 1 (31 de mayo de 2023): 1–37. http://dx.doi.org/10.4337/jlp.2023.01.01.
Texto completoWang, Yinwei. "Localization Construction of Security Token Offering". Transactions on Economics, Business and Management Research 5 (31 de marzo de 2024): 207–19. http://dx.doi.org/10.62051/ca4aty74.
Texto completoPiecha, Jacek. "Decyzja o zezwoleniu na lokalizację obiektów budowlanych w pasie drogowym jako źródło prawa do dysponowania nieruchomością na cele budowlane". Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Rzeszowskiego. Seria Prawnicza. Prawo 30 (2020): 189–202. http://dx.doi.org/10.15584/znurprawo.2020.30.12.
Texto completoHe, Houyi y Jia Zeng. "Reflection and Improvement of the Principle of Treating Invalid Construction Contracts as Valid in the View of Civil Law". Asian Journal of Social Science Studies 7, n.º 1 (25 de enero de 2022): 1. http://dx.doi.org/10.20849/ajsss.v7i1.979.
Texto completoIryna, Sharkova. "Genesis Good Faith Interpretation (Interpretatio ex Bona Fide) in Roman Private Law". Legal Ukraine 5, n.º 5 (26 de mayo de 2021): 46–50. http://dx.doi.org/10.37749/2308-9636-2021-5(221)-6.
Texto completoJędrejek, Grzegorz. "ODPOWIEDZIALNOŚĆ INWESTORA WOBEC PODWYKONAWCÓW (ART. 6471 § 5 K.C.)". Zeszyty Prawnicze 7, n.º 1 (23 de junio de 2017): 147. http://dx.doi.org/10.21697/zp.2007.7.1.08.
Texto completoDeryugina, Tatyana V. "Linguistic Means of Misrepresentation or Fictitious Permissions in Structures of Civil Law Contracts". Civil law 6 (17 de diciembre de 2020): 3–7. http://dx.doi.org/10.18572/2070-2140-2020-6-3-7.
Texto completoBonna, Alexandre Pereira. "Profiling, stigmatization, and civil liability". Brazilian Journal of Law, Technology and Innovation 2, n.º 1 (10 de enero de 2024): 25–49. http://dx.doi.org/10.59224/bjlti.v2i1.25-49.
Texto completoKleinman, Ron S. "The Halakhic Validity of Israel’s Judicial System among Israeli Ultra-Orthodox Halakhic Decisors". Review of Rabbinic Judaism 18, n.º 2 (8 de julio de 2015): 227–59. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/15700704-12341286.
Texto completoObada, Constanta. "Legal construction of the superficies until the modernization of the civil code of the Republic of Moldova and the background which lead to the amendment of the civil code". Journal of the National Institute of Justice, n.º 3(58) (octubre de 2021): 14–18. http://dx.doi.org/10.52277/1857-2405.2021.3(58).02.
Texto completoTesis sobre el tema "Civil law – australia – interpretation and construction"
Neto, Ney Castelo Branco. "As demandas de massa : uma nova dogmática aplicável às teses repetidas". Universidade Católica de Pernambuco, 2010. http://www.unicap.br/tede//tde_busca/arquivo.php?codArquivo=481.
Texto completoThis dissertation aims to research scientific-dogmatic of demands conceming repeated theses, in other words, with the same legal reasoning. Therefore, from the historical conception of civil procedure, from its birth to the paradigm shift with the emergence of mass action, reflected about the best techniques that were able to make the mass right as a model process other than the individual and the collective. Introduced the notion of a process of practical results from the rereading of the procedure for different cases in order to occur a greater rationalization of the judgments. Also discussed was the use of judicial precedents and its variants as a means of unification of the jurisprudence, which denotes closer to family law in the Common Law. After the demonstration of such assumptions, concluded that it is possible to construct a particular dogmatic for mass actions, as crucial to ensure greater legal certainty in the solutions of similar cases.
Branco, Neto Ney Castelo. "As demandas de massa : uma nova dogmática aplicável às teses repetidas". Universidade Católica de Pernambuco, 2010. http://tede2.unicap.br:8080/handle/tede/434.
Texto completoThis dissertation aims to research scientific-dogmatic of demands conceming repeated theses, in other words, with the same legal reasoning. Therefore, from the historical conception of civil procedure, from its birth to the paradigm shift with the emergence of mass action, reflected about the best techniques that were able to make the mass right as a model process other than the individual and the collective. Introduced the notion of a process of practical results from the rereading of the procedure for different cases in order to occur a greater rationalization of the judgments. Also discussed was the use of judicial precedents and its variants as a means of unification of the jurisprudence, which denotes closer to family law in the Common Law. After the demonstration of such assumptions, concluded that it is possible to construct a particular dogmatic for mass actions, as crucial to ensure greater legal certainty in the solutions of similar cases.
Esta dissertação se propõe a uma investigação científico-dogmática das demandas relativas às teses repetidas, isto é, de mesma fundamentação jurídica. Para tanto, a partir da concepção histórica do processo civil, desde o seu nascimento até a mudança de paradigma com o surgimento das ações de massa, refletiu-se a respeito da descrição das melhores técnicas, tendo sido várias delas já inseridas em nossa legislação, para que assim se realize o direito de massa como um modelo de processo diferente do individual e do coletivo. Introduziu-se a noção de um processo de resultados práticos a partir da releitura do procedimento para casos diferenciados, de modo a ocorrer maior racionalização dos julgamentos. Também foi analisado o uso dos precedentes judiciais e suas variantes como meio de unificação da jurisprudência, o que denota maior aproximação ao direito de família do Common Law. A partir da demonstração de tais premissas, concluímos que é possível a construção de uma dogmática própria para as ações de massa, pois crucial para garantir maior segurança jurídica nas soluções de casos análogos.
Schmitz, Leonard Ziesemer. "Raciocínio probatório por inferências: critérios para o uso e controle das presunções judiciais". Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo, 2018. https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/21605.
Texto completoMade available in DSpace on 2018-11-21T09:00:42Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Leonard Ziesemer Schmitz.pdf: 2040475 bytes, checksum: 4703c1d0434a03117e5c00bb5132f267 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2018-09-19
Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior - CAPES
The present doctoral thesis seeks to deal with judicial presumptions, thus understood inferential reasoning about unknown facts, from facts known and proven in a concrete case. First, we want to identify if there are the spaces of discretion that are shielded by insufficient presumptive arguments. The work is divided into two parts, with three chapters each. The first part serves to establish theoretical premises, and the second part to approach more closely the topic of presumptions in court. The first chapter discusses the conditions of possibility for the interpreter of a particular case to become aware of the facts narrated by other Interpreter-Subjects. Further notes are given on how the ransom of the past occurs when the judge analyzes the evidence and the probative narratives of the parties. The second chapter deals with science and rationality as grounds for the relation between two facts – one known, one unknown. Considerations are made about generalizations from experience, which allow for deductive, inductive, and analogical reasoning. Also questioned is the sufficiency of the use of the argument of "rationality", often insufficient to infer. The third chapter discusses the relationship between evidence and truth, especially when a judicial presumption is often made in the name of the "pursuit of truth" in the judicial process. Moving on to the second part, the fourth chapter addresses the division of labor between parties and judge in the correctness of the facts, establishing limits of action of each Subject of the process. There is also talk of judicial evidentiary activism. The fifth chapter deals specifically with the presumptions and rules of experience (Article 375 of the CPC), which serve as argumentative basis for inferences. The sixth and final chapter captures presumptions in their practical use and speaks, in detail, of the decision to reorganize and organize the process (article 357 of the CPC), which may be an opportune moment for the correct treatment of the subject. Finally, conclusions are drawn about a possible criteriology for the legitimate and discursive use of inferential reasoning
A presente tese de doutoramento busca tratar das presunções simples ou presunções judiciais, assim entendidos os raciocínios inferenciais sobre fatos não conhecidos, a partir de fatos conhecidos e provados em um caso concreto. Quer-se, antes de tudo, identificar quais são os espaços de discricionariedade que se blindam por trás de fundamentos presuntivos insuficientes. O trabalho está dividido em duas partes, com três capítulos cada. A primeira parte serve para estabelecer premissas teóricas, e a segunda para abordar mais de perto o tema das presunções em juízo. O primeiro capítulo fala a respeito das condições de possibilidade para que o intérprete de um caso concreto tome conhecimento dos fatos narrados por outros Sujeitos-intérpretes. São feitas ainda anotações sobre a maneira como o resgate do passado ocorre quando o juiz analisa as provas e as narrativas probatórias das partes. O segundo capítulo trata da ciência e da racionalidade como fundamentos para a relação entre dois fatos – um sabido, outro não sabido. Fazem-se considerações sobre as generalizações a partir da experiência, que permitem raciocínios dedutivos, indutivos e analógicos. É também questionada a suficiência do uso do argumento “racionalidade”, muitas vezes insuficiente para presumir. O terceiro capítulo fala sobre a relação entre provas e verdade, especialmente quando uma presunção judicial frequentemente é feita em nome da “busca da verdade” no processo judicial. Dando início à segunda parte, o quarto capítulo discute a divisão de trabalho entre partes e juiz no acertamento dos fatos, estabelecendo limites de atuação de cada Sujeito do processo. Fala-se também do ativismo judicial em matéria de provas e da possibilidade de produção oficiosa de provas. O quinto capítulo trata especificamente das presunções e das regras da experiência (art. 375, do CPC), que lhes servem de base. O sexto e último capítulo capta as presunções em seu uso prático e fala, com detalhe, da decisão de saneamento e organização do processo (art. 357, do CPC), que pode ser um momento oportuno para o trato correto do tema. Por fim, são traçadas conclusões a respeito de uma possível criteriologia para o uso legítimo e discursivo do raciocínio inferencial probatório
Brand, Jacobus Frederick Daniel (Danie). "Courts, socio-economic rights and transformative politics". Thesis, Stellenbosch : University of Stellenbosch, 2009. http://hdl.handle.net/10019.1/1333.
Texto completoENGLISH SUMMARY: The point of departure of this dissertation is that transformation in South Africa depends on transformative politics – extra-institutional, substantive, oppositional, transformation-oriented politics. One challenge South Africa’s constitution therefore poses to courts is to take account of the impact of adjudication on transformative politics. The purpose of this dissertation is to investigate the relationship between adjudication and transformative politics within a specific context – adjudication of socio-economic rights cases. This relationship is commonly described in a positive light – either that adjudication of socio-economic rights cases promotes transformative politics by giving impoverished people access to the basic resources required for political participation; or that adjudication of such cases is in itself a space for transformative politics. Although there is much truth in both these descriptions, both under-estimate the extent to which adjudication also limits transformative politics. This dissertation focuses on the extent to which adjudication limits transformative politics – it comprises an analysis of socio-economic rights cases with the aim of showing how adjudication of these cases, despite positive results, also limited transformative politics. The theoretical aspects of this problem are outlined in the first chapter. After a description of the body of case law on which the analysis focuses two chapters follow in which two ways in which adjudication limits transformative politics are investigated. The first traces how courts in socio-economic rights cases participate in discourses about impoverishment that tend to describe the problem as non-political – specifically how courts tend to describe impoverishment as technical rather than political in nature; and how courts implicitly legitimise in their judgments liberal-capitalist views of impoverishment that insist that impoverishment is best addressed through the unregulated market. Then follows a chapter investigating how views of legal interpretation in terms of which legal materials have a certain and determinable meaning that can be mechanically found by courts limit transformative politics by insulating adjudication from critique and emphasising finality in adjudication. Throughout it is shown how courts can mitigate the limiting effects of adjudication, by legitimating the political agency of impoverished people, by using remedies requiring political engagement between opponents and postponing closure in adjudication, and by adopting a different approach to interpretation, that emphasises the pliability and relative indeterminacy of legal materials. Despite this, the conclusion of the dissertation is that courts can never wholly avoid the limiting impact of adjudication on transformative politics, but should rather aim to remain continually aware of it.
AFRIKAANS OPSOMMING: Die uitgangspunt van hierdie proefskrif is dat transformasie in Suid-Afrika afhang van transformatiewe politiek – buite-institusionele, substantiewe, opposisionele, transformasie-gerigte politiek. Een eis wat Suid-Afrika se grondwet daarom aan howe stel, is om ag te slaan op die impak van beregting op transformatiewe politiek. Die doel van hierdie proefskrif is om die verhouding tussen beregting en transformatiewe politiek binne ‘n spesifieke konteks – beregting van sake oor sosio-ekonomiese regte – te ondersoek. Meeste beskouinge van hierdie verhouding beskryf dit in ‘n positiewe lig - óf dat die beregting van sake oor sosio-ekonomiese regte transformatiewe politiek bevorder deur vir verarmde mense toegang tot basiese lewensmiddele te bewerkstellig sodat hulle aan politieke optrede kan deelneem; óf dat beregting van sulke sake opsigself ‘n spasie is vir transformatiewe politiek. Hoewel daar waarheid steek in beide beskrywings, onderskat hulle die mate waartoe beregting ook transformatiewe politiek kan beperk. Hierdie proefskrif fokus op hoe beregting transformatiewe politiek beperk - dit behels ‘n analise van sake oor sosio-ekonomiese regte met die doel om te wys hoe beregting van hierdie sake, ten spyte van kennelik positiewe gevolge ook transformatiewe politiek beperk het. Die teoretiese vergestalting van hierdie probleem word in die eerste hoofstuk beskou. Na ‘n beskrywing van die liggaam van regspraak waarop die analise fokus volg twee hoofstukke waarin twee maniere waarop beregting transformatiewe politiek beperk ondersoek word. Die eerste beskou hoe howe in sake oor sosio-ekonomiese regte deelneem aan diskoerse oor verarming wat neig om hierdie probleem as non-polities te beskryf - spesifiek hoe howe neig om hierdie problem as tegnies eerder as polities van aard te beskryf; en hoe howe liberaal-kapitalistiese sieninge van verarming, ingevolge waarvan verarming deur die ongereguleerde mark aangespreek behoort te word, implisiet in hul uitsprake legitimeer. Dan volg ‘n hoofstuk wat naspeur hoe sieninge van regsinterpretasie ingevolge waarvan regsmateriaal ‘n sekere en vasstelbare betekenis het wat meganies deur howe gevind word, transformatiewe politieke optrede beperk deur die openheid van beregting vir kritiek te beperk en finaliteit in beregting in die hand te werk. Deurgaans word gewys hoe howe die beperkende effek van beregting kan teëwerk, deur die politike agentskap van verarmde mense te legitimeer, deur remedies te gebruik wat politieke onderhandeling tussen opponente bewerkstellig en finale oplossings uitstel, en deur ‘n ander benadering tot interpretasie, wat die buigsaamheid en relatiewe onbepaalbaarheid van regsmateriaal erken, te omarm. Tog is die gevolgtrekking van die proefskrif dat howe nooit die beperkende effek van beregting op transformatiewe politiek geheel kan vermy nie, maar eerder deurgaans daarop bedag moet wees.
Van, Heerden Michael 1953. "The Bill of Rights in public administration". Thesis, 2002. http://hdl.handle.net/10500/979.
Texto completoPublic Administration
D. Litt et Phil.(Public Administration)
Libros sobre el tema "Civil law – australia – interpretation and construction"
Pearce, D. C. Statutory interpretation in Australia. 5a ed. Australia: Butterworths, 2001.
Buscar texto completoPearce, D. C. Statutory interpretation in Australia. 3a ed. Sydney: Butterworths, 1988.
Buscar texto completoGeddes, R. S. (Robert S.), 1944-, ed. Statutory interpretation in Australia. 7a ed. Chatswood, N.S.W: LexisNexis Butterworths, 2011.
Buscar texto completoLaw Reform Commission of Western Australia. Report on United Kingdom statutes in force in Western Australia. [Perth, W.A.]: The Commission, 1994.
Buscar texto completoShuy, Roger W. Fighting over words: Language and civil law cases. New York: Oxford University Press, 2007.
Buscar texto completoCommission, Scottish Law. Interpretation in private law. Edinburgh: The Commission, 1996.
Buscar texto completoSuzanne, Corcoran y Bottomley Stephen, eds. Interpreting statutes. Annandale, N.S.W: Federation Press, 2005.
Buscar texto completoAdministrative law: Context and critique. 2a ed. Leichhardt, N.S.W: Federation Press, 2008.
Buscar texto completoBelgium. Code civil: Textes en vigueur au 15 octobre 2003. 3a ed. Bruxelles: Bruylant, 2003.
Buscar texto completoBelgium. Code civil: Textes en vigueur au 30 juin 1995. Bruxelles: Bruylant, 1995.
Buscar texto completoCapítulos de libros sobre el tema "Civil law – australia – interpretation and construction"
Stefancic, Richard Delgado Jean. "The Social Construction of Brown v. Board of Education: Law Reform and the Reconstructive Paradox". En Redefining Equality, 154–71. Oxford University PressNew York, NY, 1998. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195116649.003.0010.
Texto completoGolding, Gabrielle. "A Legal Overview". En Shaping Contracts for Work, 17–35. Oxford University PressOxford, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192867827.003.0002.
Texto completoActas de conferencias sobre el tema "Civil law – australia – interpretation and construction"
White, Nancy J., Sigitas Mitkus y Renata Cibulskienė. "Classification of a defect as breach of contract or tort: a comparative study of the U.S. and the Republic of Lithuania". En Contemporary Issues in Business, Management and Economics Engineering. Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.3846/cibmee.2019.067.
Texto completo