Literatura académica sobre el tema "Choice reversal"
Crea una cita precisa en los estilos APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard y otros
Consulte las listas temáticas de artículos, libros, tesis, actas de conferencias y otras fuentes académicas sobre el tema "Choice reversal".
Junto a cada fuente en la lista de referencias hay un botón "Agregar a la bibliografía". Pulsa este botón, y generaremos automáticamente la referencia bibliográfica para la obra elegida en el estilo de cita que necesites: APA, MLA, Harvard, Vancouver, Chicago, etc.
También puede descargar el texto completo de la publicación académica en formato pdf y leer en línea su resumen siempre que esté disponible en los metadatos.
Artículos de revistas sobre el tema "Choice reversal"
Zhang, Nian, Yiyuan Zhang y Xia Luo. "Travel decision reversals paradox of competitive metro lines: The Equate-to-differentiate Theory Interpretation". MATEC Web of Conferences 308 (2020): 03007. http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/202030803007.
Texto completoGelinas, Luke. "Frames, Choice-Reversal, and Consent". Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 18, n.º 5 (14 de marzo de 2015): 1049–57. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10677-015-9581-9.
Texto completoTsetsos, Konstantinos, Marius Usher y Nick Chater. "Preference reversal in multiattribute choice." Psychological Review 117, n.º 4 (2010): 1275–91. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0020580.
Texto completoZhou, Yan-Bang, Qiang Li y Hong-Zhi Liu. "Visual attention and time preference reversals". Judgment and Decision Making 16, n.º 4 (julio de 2021): 1010–38. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s1930297500008068.
Texto completoNeeman, Itay. "Necessary use of induction in a reversal". Journal of Symbolic Logic 76, n.º 2 (junio de 2011): 561–74. http://dx.doi.org/10.2178/jsl/1305810764.
Texto completoMoen, Espen R. y Christian Riis. "Policy Reversal". American Economic Review 100, n.º 3 (1 de junio de 2010): 1261–68. http://dx.doi.org/10.1257/aer.100.3.1261.
Texto completoSeabrooke, Tina, Andy J. Wills, Lee Hogarth y Chris J. Mitchell. "Automaticity and cognitive control: Effects of cognitive load on cue-controlled reward choice". Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 72, n.º 6 (10 de septiembre de 2018): 1507–21. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1747021818797052.
Texto completoLi, Shu. "Is There a Problem with Preference Reversals?" Psychological Reports 74, n.º 2 (abril de 1994): 675–79. http://dx.doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1994.74.2.675.
Texto completoGuo, Liang. "Contextual deliberation and the choice-valuation preference reversal". Journal of Economic Theory 195 (julio de 2021): 105285. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jet.2021.105285.
Texto completoBeeby, Emma y K. Geoffrey White. "PREFERENCE REVERSAL BETWEEN IMPULSIVE AND SELF-CONTROL CHOICE". Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior 99, n.º 3 (25 de febrero de 2013): 260–76. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jeab.23.
Texto completoTesis sobre el tema "Choice reversal"
Mata, Jutta. "Healthy food choice". Doctoral thesis, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftliche Fakultät II, 2008. http://dx.doi.org/10.18452/15723.
Texto completoThis dissertation focuses on food-related decision making, in particular, how food related environments and cognition interact to determine people’s food choices. The first manuscript, “When Diets Last: Lower Cognitive Complexity Increases Diet Adherence,” investigates the role of the cognitive complexity in diet adherence. Can weight loss diets fail because they are too complicated from a cognitive point of view, meaning that dieters are not able to recall or process the diet rules? The impact of excessive cognitive demands on diet adherence were investigated with 1,136 dieters in a longitudinal online-questionnaire. We measured perceived rule complexity controlling for other factors known to influence adherence. Previous diet behavior, self-efficacy, planning and perceived rule complexity predicted an increased risk to quit the diet prematurely, with self-efficacy and diet complexity being the strongest factors. The second manuscript, “Meat Label Design: Effects on Stage Progression, Risk Perception, and Product Evaluation,” presents two studies which tested the impact of health-related meat labels on product evaluation and intention. Specifically, the studies examined how informational content and the context (separate vs. conjoint evaluation) in which labels are assessed influence the evaluation of meat products. The results showed that conjoint assessment of labels can lead to contrary product rankings compared to separate evaluations. Moreover, the results suggest that being exposed to food labels containing specific health-relevant information can increase motivation to consider health aspects in those consumers without previous intention to do so. The third manuscript, “Predicting Children’s Meal Preferences: How Much Do Parents Know?” investigated prediction behavior concerning other people’s food choices. In particular, it asked how accurately and what cues parents use to predict their children’s meal choices. Overall, parents’ prediction accuracy matched the stability of children’s meal choices, implying that accuracy was as high as can be expected. The results suggest parents were able to obtain high predictive accuracy by using specific knowledge about their child’s likes and projecting their own preferences.
Widemo, Maria. "Mutual Mate Choice in the Deep Snouted Pipefish Syngnathus typhle". Doctoral thesis, Uppsala universitet, Zooekologi, 2003. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-3303.
Texto completoPotter, Kevin Whitman. "When You are Confident that You are Wrong: Response Reversals and the Expanded Poisson Race Model". The Ohio State University, 2011. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=osu1321454142.
Texto completoZokaei, Ashtiani Amin. "Essay in decision making". Doctoral thesis, Luiss Guido Carli, 2017. http://hdl.handle.net/11385/201127.
Texto completoBlumen, Sacha Carl. "Granularity and state socialisation: explaining Germany’s 2015 refugee policy reversal". Thesis, Canberra, ACT : The Australian National University, 2016. http://hdl.handle.net/1885/111430.
Texto completoBelayadi, Raouia. "Contribution à l'étude des axiomes du choix social : la symétrie inverse et l'homogénéité des procédures de vote". Thesis, Normandie, 2018. http://www.theses.fr/2018NORMC020/document.
Texto completoThe contribution of this thesis lies in the evaluation of the vulnerability of a number of voting rules to the violationof two properties of the theory of social choice. We rely on the axiomatic approach of social choice theory to examinethe behavior of a social choice procedure according to a value judgment (or axiom) emitted by the economist.Reversal symmetry is the first property studied. Following the works of Saari [150], we evaluate two families ofvoting by using this property as the decision criterion : the simple scoring rules on the one hand, and the scoringrules with runoff on the other hand. We do probability calculations to evaluate how frequent this phenomenon is,in the three-candidate case under universal domain as well as under a restricted domain, and we also tackle thefour-candidate case and the infinite number of voters case.The second topic is devoted to the study of the Dodgsonrule according to the homogeneity axiom. We introduce a simple and systematic method for the computation ofthe Dodgson score. We distinguish various classes of profiles at which that rule may be vulnerable to this property.Further, frequencies of violation of this property by the Dodgson rule are provided
Matos, Daniel Carvalho de. "Análise dos efeitos do atraso e da probabilidade do reforço sobre a escolha em condições com esquemas concorrentes encadeados e simples". Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo, 2013. https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/16703.
Texto completoThe purpose of this research was to assess the effects of manipulating reinforcer delay and probability over the choices in simple and chained concurrent schedules and if these effects suggest similarities between these two reinforcer parameters. Four experiments were conducted. 12 psychology students from a private university served as participants, three for each experiment. The Experiments 1 and 2 involved choice trials between concurrent chained schedules with two links, with the manipulation of reinforcer magnitude and delay (Experiment 1) and reinforcer magnitude and probability (Experiment 2). In both experiments, the choice of component A, from the first link, produced, after T seconds (Experiment 1) or after a probability P (Experiment 2), the access to a new choice link between the components R1 with a small immediate reinforcer (Experiment 1) or a small and more probable reinforcer (Experiment 2) versus R2 with a larger delayed reinforcer (Experiment 1) or with a large and less probable reinforcer (Experiment 2). Still in the first link, in case the component B was chosen, after T seconds (Experiment 1) or a probability P (Experiment 2), there was a second link in which only one component was available: R2 with a large delayed reinforcer (Experiment 1) or with a large and less probable reinforcer (Experiment 2). As a result, first the participants went through selection conditions in which the larger reinforcer should be preferred over the small one (for both experiments); the immediate reinforcer should be preferred over the delayed one (Experiment 1) and the more probable reinforcer should be preferred over the less probable one (Experiment 2); the small immediate reinforcer should be preferred over the larger delayed reinforcer (Experiment 1) and the small and more probable reinforcer should be preferred over the larger and less probable one (Experiment 2). After this, all participants from both experiments went through conditions in which preference reversals, to the component with the larger and more delayed reinforcer (Experiment 1) or the component with the larger and less probable reinforcer (Experiment 2), were assessed. In Experiment 1, the variable time (T) between the two links was manipulated, involving 7.5 and 15 seconds. As result, the data revealed that preference reversal occurred for all the three participants from Experiment 1, considering that, only for participant P1, the reversal occurred when the time (T) between the two links was 7.5 seconds. Besides, for two of the participants (P1 and P3), most of the choices, on first link, were made on component B (alternative that was called the commitment choice according to the literature). In Experiment 2, preference reversal was assessed when the probability between the two links was 17%. The data revealed that reversal occurred, in the sense that most of the choices were made on the component with the larger and less probable reinforcer for all the three participants (P5, P6 and P7). Only for one of these participants (P6), the component B, from first link, was the most chosen one in two blocks of trials. Even though the data suggested relations with those that were obtained in Experiment 1, with the suggestion that reinforcer delay and probability share similar effects over the choices in chained concurrent schedules, there was a methodological problem in Experiment 2 that makes the comparison more difficult. The fact that the probability of the passage from the first to the second link was very low (17%) limited the number of trials in which participants had the chance to respond on second link. Consequently, the access to the reinforcers happened in only a few occasions. Experiments 3 and 4 involved choice trials between simple concurrent schedules with the manipulation of reinforcer magnitude and delay (Experiment 3) and reinforcer magnitude and probability (Experiment 4). After selection conditions similar to those from the two previous experiments, the participants went through a condition with concurrent FR / FR schedules (with a ratio that could vary from 10 to 80), in which the preference reversal was assessed. The data revealed that reversal occurred for all participants from Experiment 3 (P7, P8 and P9) with preference of the component with the larger and delayed reinforcer and the same happened for two of the participants from Experiment 4 (P11 and P12). The data suggested similarities between the reinforcer delay and probability parameters, considering their effects over choices in simple concurrent schedules. In both experiments other conditions (CRF, SigFR and FI) were conducted to assess if the response pattern produced by the FR would be changed, with most of the choices made on the other component with the small immediate reinforcer (Experiment 3) or the small and more probable reinforcer (Experiment 4). The data revealed that the change occurred only for two of the participants from Experiment 4 (P11 and P12), reinforcing the similarity with the data from a research conducted previously with pigeons as subjects
O objetivo desta pesquisa foi avaliar o efeito da manipulação dos parâmetros de atraso e probalidade do reforço sobre as escolhas em esquemas concorrentes simples e encadeados e se esses efeitos sugerem semelhanças entre esses dois parâmetros. Quatro estudos foram conduzidos. Participaram 12 estudantes universitários do curso de psicologia, sendo três participantes para cada estudo. Os Estudos 1 e 2 envolveram tentativas de escolha entre esquemas concorrentes encadeados com dois elos, com manipulação de magnitude e atraso do reforço (Estudo 1) e magnitude e probabilidade do reforço (Estudo 2). Em ambos os estudos, a escolha do componente A, do primeiro elo, produzia, após T segundos (Estudo 1) ou em uma dada probabilidade P (Estudo 2), o acesso a um novo elo de escolha entre os componentes R1 com reforço menor imediato (Estudo 1) ou reforço menor e mais provável (Estudo 2) versus R2 com reforço maior atrasado (Estudo 1) ou reforço maior e menos provável (Estudo 2). Ainda no primeiro elo, caso o componente B fosse escolhido, após T segundos (Estudo 1) ou uma dada probabilidade P (Estudo 2), havia um segundo elo em que apenas um componente, o R2' com reforço maior atrasado (Estudo 1) ou maior e menos provável (Estudo 2), estava presente. Como resultado, primeiramente os participantes passaram por condições de seleção em que maior magnitude deveria ser preferida sobre menor magnitude (para ambos os estudos); menor atraso deveria ser preferido sobre maior atraso (Estudo 1) e maior probabilidade deveria ser preferida sobre menor probabilidade (Estudo 2); menor magnitude e menor atraso deveriam ser preferidos sobre maior magnitude e maior atraso (Estudo 1) e menor magnitude e maior probabilidade deveriam ser preferidos sobre maior magnitude e menor probabilidade (Estudo 2). Depois, os participantes de ambos os estudos passaram por condições em que a reversão da preferência para a alternativa com reforço maior atrasado (Estudo 1) e reforço maior e menos provável (Estudo 2) foi avaliada. No Estudo 1, a variável tempo entre os elos (T) foi manipulada, envolvendo 7.5 e 15 segundos. Como resultado, os dados revelaram que a reversão aconteceu para todos os três participantes do Estudo 1, sendo que, apenas para o participante P1, tal reversão já ocorreu com o tempo (T) entre os elos de 7.5 segundos. Além disso, para dois dos participantes (P1 e P3) os maiores percentuais de escolha, no primeiro elo, foram no componente B. No Estudo 2, a reversão da preferência foi avaliada quando a probabilidade (P) entre os elos era de 17%. O dado indica que a reversão ocorreu, no sentido de que a maior parte das escolhas foi da alternativa com reforço maior e menos provável para todos os três participantes (P5, P6 e P7). Apenas para um desses participantes (P6) o componente B do primeiro elo foi o mais escolhido em dois blocos de tentativas. Ainda que esses dados sugiram relações com os que foram obtidos no Estudo 1, com a sugestão de que atraso e probabilidade do reforço apresentariam efeitos semelhantes sobre as escolhas em esquemas concorrentes encadeados, houve diferenças nas taxas de reforços entre os estudos, o que dificulta a comparação. O fato de a probabilidade de passagem para o segundo elo ter sido muito baixa (17%) limitou o número de tentativas em que os participantes tinham a chance de responder no segundo elo do Estudo 2. Consequentemente, o acesso aos reforçadores aconteciam em poucas ocasiões. Os Estudos 3 e 4 envolveram tentativas de escolha entre esquemas concorrentes simples, com manipulação de magnitude e atraso do reforço (Estudo 3) e magnitude e probabilidade do reforço (Estudo 4). Após condições de seleção semelhantes às dos estudos anteriores, os participantes passaram por uma condição com esquemas FR / FR concorrentes (com razão podendo variar de 10 a 80), em que a reversão da preferência foi avaliada. Os dados indicaram que a reversão ocorreu com todos os participantes do Estudo 3 (P7, P8 e P9) com maior preferência do componente com reforço maior atrasado e aconteceu com dois participantes do Estudo 4 (P11 e P12). Esses dados sugerem semelhanças entre o atraso e probabilidade do reforço em esquemas concorrentes simples. Em ambos os Estudos foram conduzidas, posteriormente, condições (CRF, SigFR e FI) em que se avaliou se o padrão de respostas gerado pela condição com FR seria modificado, com maior escolha da outra alternativa com reforço menor imediato (Estudo 3) ou reforço menor e mais provável (Estudo 4). Os dados revelaram que a mudança de padrão ocorreu apenas para dois dos participantes do Estudo 4 (P11 e P12) reforçando relações com os dados de um estudo conduzido anteriormente com pombos
Silva, João Carlos de Paiva Coelho Machado. "The impact of the measurement unit of unit price on consumer preference and choice". Master's thesis, NSBE - UNL, 2010. http://hdl.handle.net/10362/10289.
Texto completoThis project studies how variations in the measurement unit of unit price affect consumers’ preference and choice. Particularly, we contend that consumers’ relative preference for the same two option is different when options’ unit price is presented in a large measurement unit – per kg; than when options’ unit price is presented in a small measurement unit – per 100g. Moreover, consumers’ choice will shift more to lower unit price options when options’ unit price is presented in larger measurement unit – per kg. Two experiments confirmed our hypotheses. Implications and future research on the topic are discussed.
Alshamrani, Ahmad M. "Combined routing and product take-back strategies in reverse logistics". Full text available, 2003. http://images.lib.monash.edu.au/ts/theses/alshamrani.pdf.
Texto completoBoland, Wendy Attaya. "Predicting the Fickle Buyer with the Attribute Carryover Effect". Diss., The University of Arizona, 2008. http://hdl.handle.net/10150/194913.
Texto completoLibros sobre el tema "Choice reversal"
Reversal theory: Motivation, emotion, and personality. London: Routledge, 1989.
Buscar texto completoApter, Michael J. Reversal theory: The dynamics of motivation, emotion, and personality. 2a ed. Oxford: Oneworld, 2007.
Buscar texto completoAutumn, Rogers, ed. [Un earth]: Exploring a land with no name. Waukegan, IL: Plethora Publishing, 2008.
Buscar texto completoNegotiating identity in contemporary Japan: The case of kikokushijo. London: Kegan Paul International, 2000.
Buscar texto completoThe art of coming home. Yarmouth, Me: Intercultural Press, 1997.
Buscar texto completoThe art of coming home. Yarmouth, Me: Intercultural Press, 2001.
Buscar texto completoJapan's "international youth": The emergence of a new class of schoolchildren. Oxford [England]: Clarendon Press, 1990.
Buscar texto completoBarnard, Amanda S. Size-dependent phase transitions and phase reversal at the nanoscale. Editado por A. V. Narlikar y Y. Y. Fu. Oxford University Press, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199533053.013.5.
Texto completoWijdicks, Eelco F. M. y Sarah L. Clark. Anticoagulation and Reversal Drugs. Oxford University Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/med/9780190684747.003.0007.
Texto completoByrne, Logan. Fae's Choice: A Reverse Harem Paranormal Romance. Independently Published, 2018.
Buscar texto completoCapítulos de libros sobre el tema "Choice reversal"
Belayadi, Raouia y Boniface Mbih. "Violations of Reversal Symmetry Under Simple and Runoff Scoring Rules". En Studies in Choice and Welfare, 137–60. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-48598-6_7.
Texto completoNewell, Ben R., David A. Lagnado y David R. Shanks. "Analysing Decisions II: Prospect Theory and Preference Reversals". En Straight Choices, 125–45. 3a ed. London: Psychology Press, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781003289890-9.
Texto completoWulligundam, Praveen y Maneesha S. Inamdar. "To D(e)rive or Reverse: The Challenge and Choice of Pluripotent Stem Cells for Regenerative Medicine". En Regenerative Medicine: Laboratory to Clinic, 99–111. Singapore: Springer Singapore, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-3701-6_6.
Texto completoBongyereire, Joy Samantha. "Factors Influencing the Choice of Inorganic contrasting to Organic Practices in Irish Potato Production and Viable Actions to Reverse the Trend: A Case Study of Kisoro District, South-Western Uganda". En Science, Policy and Politics of Modern Agricultural System, 61–81. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7957-0_5.
Texto completoViganò, Paola, Bertrand Plewinski, Guillaume Vanneste y Nicolas Willemet. "Peterbos: Living in the Park, Inhabiting the City". En The Urban Book Series, 155–74. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-19748-2_11.
Texto completo"Preference reversal asymmetries in a static choice setting". En Environmental Economics, Experimental Methods, 353–65. Routledge, 2007. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203935361-31.
Texto completoUsher, Marius, Anat Elhalal y James L. McClelland. "The neurodynamics of choice, value-based decisions, and preference reversal". En The Probabilistic Mind:, 277–300. Oxford University Press, 2008. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199216093.003.0013.
Texto completoRolls, Edmund T. "Orbitofrontal cortex damage effects in humans and other primates". En The Orbitofrontal Cortex, 130–44. Oxford University Press, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198845997.003.0004.
Texto completo"Analysing decisions II: prospect theory and preference reversals". En Straight Choices, 134–53. Psychology Press, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781315727080-15.
Texto completoRosenthal, Gil G. "Mate Choice and Human Exceptionalism". En Mate Choice. Princeton University Press, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.23943/princeton/9780691150673.003.0017.
Texto completoActas de conferencias sobre el tema "Choice reversal"
Coletta, Nancy J. y David R. Williams. "Motion reversal in peripheral retina". En OSA Annual Meeting. Washington, D.C.: Optica Publishing Group, 1987. http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/oam.1987.wt3.
Texto completoFeng, Gao. "Computational Model of Preference Reversal in Judgment and Choice". En 2013 International Conference on Computer Sciences and Applications (CSA). IEEE, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/csa.2013.141.
Texto completoWilliams, David R. "Photoreceptor Sampling of Moving Images". En Applied Vision. Washington, D.C.: Optica Publishing Group, 1989. http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/av.1989.wc1.
Texto completoColetta, Nancy J. y David R. Williams. "Psychophysical estimate of parafoveal cone spacing". En OSA Annual Meeting. Washington, D.C.: Optica Publishing Group, 1986. http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/oam.1986.thi2.
Texto completoOrel-Bixler, Deborah A., A. M. Norcia y Smith-Kettlewell. "Differential Growth in Acuity for Pattern Reversal and Pattern Onset-Offset Targets". En Noninvasive Assessment of the Visual System. Washington, D.C.: Optica Publishing Group, 1986. http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/navs.1986.mb4.
Texto completoEynon, P. A., A. Whitfield, M. R. Firth, A. J. Parkes y R. Saxton. "A Study of the Flow Characteristics in the Inducer Bleed Slot of a Centrifugal Compressor". En ASME 1996 International Gas Turbine and Aeroengine Congress and Exhibition. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 1996. http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/96-gt-262.
Texto completoLee, Jong Hak, Yu Jun Lee, Jung Sam Kim, Seo Kyung Jeong, Min Su Kim, Seok Hoon Oh, Kyoung Wook Jung, Soo Yong Son y Chang Reol Kim. "Nano Probe Analysis of Device Characteristics Affected by Ring Type Crystalline Defect". En ISTFA 2011. ASM International, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.31399/asm.cp.istfa2011p0322.
Texto completo"A BEHAVIORAL MODEL OF REVERSE MORTGAGE CHOICE". En 7th European Real Estate Society Conference: ERES Conference 2000. ERES, 2000. http://dx.doi.org/10.15396/eres2000_065.
Texto completoKonigsberg, Amir y Ron Asherov. "A Recommender System Sensitive to Intransitive Choice and Preference Reversals". En Fourth International conference on Computer Science & Information Technology. Academy & Industry Research Collaboration Center (AIRCC), 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.5121/csit.2014.4235.
Texto completoChen Guowei. "Reverse auction format choice decision based on supplier attributes". En 2015 12th International Conference on Service Systems and Service Management (ICSSSM). IEEE, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/icsssm.2015.7170287.
Texto completoInformes sobre el tema "Choice reversal"
Andreoni, James, Deniz Aydin, Blake Barton, B. Douglas Bernheim y Jeffrey Naecker. When Fair Isn't Fair: Understanding Choice Reversals Involving Social Preferences. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research, noviembre de 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.3386/w25257.
Texto completoElmann, Anat, Orly Lazarov, Joel Kashman y Rivka Ofir. therapeutic potential of a desert plant and its active compounds for Alzheimer's Disease. United States Department of Agriculture, marzo de 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.32747/2015.7597913.bard.
Texto completo