Literatura académica sobre el tema "Blanchot, Maurice (1907-2003) – Phénoménologie"
Crea una cita precisa en los estilos APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard y otros
Consulte las listas temáticas de artículos, libros, tesis, actas de conferencias y otras fuentes académicas sobre el tema "Blanchot, Maurice (1907-2003) – Phénoménologie".
Junto a cada fuente en la lista de referencias hay un botón "Agregar a la bibliografía". Pulsa este botón, y generaremos automáticamente la referencia bibliográfica para la obra elegida en el estilo de cita que necesites: APA, MLA, Harvard, Vancouver, Chicago, etc.
También puede descargar el texto completo de la publicación académica en formato pdf y leer en línea su resumen siempre que esté disponible en los metadatos.
Artículos de revistas sobre el tema "Blanchot, Maurice (1907-2003) – Phénoménologie"
Holland, Michael. "Maurice Blanchot (1907–2003)". Paragraph 26, n.º 3 (noviembre de 2003): 127–30. http://dx.doi.org/10.3366/para.2003.26.3.127.
Texto completoNancy, Jean-Luc. "Maurice Blanchot, 1907–2003". Paragraph 30, n.º 3 (noviembre de 2007): 3–4. http://dx.doi.org/10.3366/para.2007.30.3.3.
Texto completoTesis sobre el tema "Blanchot, Maurice (1907-2003) – Phénoménologie"
Rinaldi, Riccardo. "Maurice Blanchot et la question de l'image". Thesis, Sorbonne université, 2019. http://www.theses.fr/2019SORUL029.
Texto completoMost philosophical approaches to Maurice Blanchot's work have hitherto reserved a marginal place for the question of image. Since L'Espace littéraire (1955), however, image assumes a theoretical status that enables us to apprehend it as the matrix of his writing that, initially divided between fiction and criticism, finally achieves its most natural thriving in fragmentation.Far from embracing a sterile nihilism, Blanchot derives from Heidegger’s reflection on art the idea of an appearance as disappearance, of a form invalidating the distinction between matter and form; a presence which is not given: the presence of an absence. He draws from it a radically anti-humanist vision, much more coherent than the conception of the event defining the history of the epochs of the Being: coming before the thing, image condemns the consciousness of the metaphysical subject as the exclusive stage of all representation. The face of death becomes the paradigm of the blind gaze that things lay upon us. Hence, literature proves to be preliminary to a different vision, one that touches on what precedes man’s existence as a whole, his finitude being scattered in an endless approach of the end.Leaving aside the political texts of Blanchot, I have considered the œuvre as a priority in the author’s fate, which is overcome and determined by writing. Less structured than Heidegger's, Blanchot’s work proves finally more suited to be read through the perspective suggested in the Letter on Humanism: we cannot conceive an ethics, as a thought of humanism, if we have not previously redefine what the humanitas of man is
King, Tzu-Chun. "Les Figures de la mort et la création littéraire chez Maurice Blanchot". Electronic Thesis or Diss., Sorbonne université, 2024. http://www.theses.fr/2024SORUL018.
Texto completoThis thesis aims to analyze the way in which two experiences are intertwined in the work of Maurice Blanchot: the experience of literary creation and that of death. My goal is not to establish a Blanchotian phenomenology of death, but to examine the process of metaphorization in which Blanchot joins analogically these two seemingly disparate experiences. I will explain how he defines literature by a series of metaphorical displacements of the notion of death, as well as how the experience of mortality mediates his phenomenology of literary creation. I argue that, in this phenomenology which depicts a writer's encounter with language — with its materiality and its power of idealization at the same time — and his encounter with work (in the Blanchotian sense of an ideal state pursued by never attained by the writer), Blanchot creates the following figures: suicide, murder, corpse, survivor, witness and the “other”, each of which maintains an intimate relation with death that serves to define the process of literary creation. These figures presuppose not only a philosophy of death, philosophy that we should study in the context of Heidegger's and Levinas's influence, but also a conception of literary creation formulated by Blanchot's reading of Mallarmé, Valéry and Rilke. Through an analysis of the polysemy and the paradox of death in Blanchot's writing, I intend to understand his argumentative strategies and rhetorical devices which induce his claim that the experience of writing is equivalent to that of death
Harlingue, Olivier. "Maurice Blanchot et la philosophie". Paris 10, 2005. http://www.theses.fr/2005PA100097.
Texto completoThe first part of our study – devoted to the examination of first moment of Blanchot's thinking, which extends from Faux pas to Le livre à venir – initially sets out to show how Blanchot interrogates, both phenomenologically and ontologically, literature's very existence as the incessant interminability that will appear to us not only as the phenomenon (of) literature, but also as that which already demands a certain critical relation with philosophical discursivity. Then again, in the second part of our study – devoted to the second moment of Blanchot's thinking, which extends from L'entretien infini to L' écriture du désastre – it becomes a matter of "delimiting" and "overcoming" the very limits of this still merely critical relation with philosophy so as to think the incessant interminability, no longer phenomeno-onto-logically, but as the very a-plastic form of difference (of) neutral and writing outside philosophy and outside literature
Amara, Nadia. "Maurice Blanchot 1931-1941 : une dissidence plurielle". Paris 7, 2003. http://www.theses.fr/2003PA070063.
Texto completoThis work presents a body of articles written during the first ten years of the career of Maurice Blanchot as a rightwing joumalist and social critic. It attempts to understand the plural meanings which can be given to Blanchot's revolutionary dissidence, while contextualizing the ideological representations and theoretical foundations, such as personalism and Maurras, that underlie his writing. Through Blanchot's essays, we look at neoclassical themes and divisions, including culture / civilization, germanophobia / nationalism, clarity / obscurity, universality / modemity, to show how debates surrounding neoclassicism are pivotal to his reading and in turn, how certain categories he uses, "l'obscur", "la nécessité", "l'étrange" and "le langage", help reassess literary value as mythical notion in literary history
Pulido, Martha. "L'approche d'autrui, dans l'oeuvre romanesque de Maurice Blanchot". Paris 12, 1994. http://www.theses.fr/1994PA120058.
Texto completoThe present work introduces the theme of the process of transformation experienced in the ways of seeing the other ; therefore, a transformation of the perception of the literary work, and of the time favourable to its creation. M. Blanchot's work speaks to the contemporary man questioning : what is litterature good for ? the character that allows this approach is the wandering poet, thomas, whom we have drawn near the image of the suppliant and the troubadour. In this manner, m. Blanchot's work reveals itself as a challenge against the law in general, and against the narrative laws in particular, so serving the purpose of forgetting the weight of the law
Stratton, Gae. "La mathematique extraordinaire de maurice blanchot". Paris, EHESS, 1991. http://www.theses.fr/1991EHES0312.
Texto completoFrom the beginning a form of translation has been at the root of our concerns. At first, this translation was to take place between the place topologically defined, and the letter, term which at that time was practically synonymous as far as our text was concerned with the signifier. A bit later, and this teanslation was to operate between mathematical letter (the mathematical sign) and the language of thought, and more precisely, this language as it is expressed and realized in the literary work of maurice blanchor. In the end, and as a consequence of the passage from its point of departure to its destination, it became a form of translation connecting conceptual terms, the first being the point, with the same terms understood outside of all and any possibility of conceptualisation
Jahng-Koh, Jae-jung. "Récit et théorie littéraire chez Maurice Blanchot". Paris 10, 1985. http://www.theses.fr/1985PA100272.
Texto completoMesnard, Philippe. "Maurice Blanchot, le sujet de l'engagement littéraire". Paris 7, 1994. http://www.theses.fr/1994PA070078.
Texto completoLimet, Yun Sun. "L'écriture critique de Maurice Blanchot". Paris 8, 1997. https://octaviana.fr/document/181449196#?c=0&m=0&s=0&cv=0.
Texto completoWe elaborate the notion of "critical writing" in blanchot's non fictional work. This notion is important, not only because these writings are critical, but also because criticism should be understood as central to writing as such. We have restricted our corpus to the non fictional writings. These writings think literary criticism as a "relation" fondamentaly defined by its impossibility. Analysing blanchot's practice of literary criticism, we find that this "relation" is paradoxically possible in a "critical writing". The critical dimension comes from the self questioning of blanchot's critical writings on criticism. But the autoreflexive gesture is not only a solipsist movement it is open to a specific temporality that we call the "time of criticism". This time signifies that writing is a process within which reading is defered and always put off in re-writing. The mean of that "defering time" is the other critics texts taken as a mediation to the text, and also, the "ressassement" through which blanchot, repeatingly, focuses on and displaces the same figures, problematics and privileged authors. This specific time of critical writing shows an evolution in blanchot's non fictional work aswell. When blanchot writes in fragments it is a moment which may be seen as a crisis and, at the same time, a renewal of the critical relation. What is at stake in that moment? the reconstitution, trough the ordeal of disaster, of the subject of writing which has been broken up. In that recovery of the subject, the self can only be thought in relation with the other. The relation with the other was inscribed from the beginning in the critical relation and its paradox should be understood according to blanchot's thinking of friendship an community : a relation that does not relate. This is the signification of the torment which inhabitates his critical writings. The impossibility of beeing in relation is sustained in the writing of/to the other writer
Sumiyoshi, Ken. "Maurice Blanchot et son écriture". Thesis, Université Clermont Auvergne (2017-2020), 2019. http://www.theses.fr/2019CLFAL014.
Texto completoIt is the inspiration that encourages us essentially to speech. But, is the man, before the act of writing / talking and at the time of the act or after the act, identical? If the subject of the act could answer positively, we dispute it. At which moment does a fissure of identity happen to the man? We show that it arrives at him at the time of the inspiration. At the dawn of philosophy, Plato assumes the identity between what inspiration asks the man to put into words and the words he confers on it. Platonic Dualism of the sensitive world and supersensible is known, but this structure that considers the idea as a final goal is, as Nietzsche correctly detects, itself motivated by the idea. The idea, as inspiration, triggers and guides the Platonic movement towards it. Located at the beginning as well as at the end, it is identical, and Hegel and Heidegger are in the same line. It is against and in this identity which constitutes a circle, that we introduce a difference or an alterity, and this in particular by the idea of immediate. Inspiration, when it comes to us, doesn’t stay; immediately appeared, it disappears immediately and at the same time. It does not remain to guide us towards it but it only passes, which means that it does not show us its presence but its absence. If the man believes to give his words to what inspiration whispers to him without language, he actually gives them to the trace of inspiration or to the absence of inspiration. By the words, he does not embody the inspiration but forms an image of the inspiration, and one of the biggest problems is that Plato, Hegel and Heidegger take the image as inspiration; they take the absence of something like its presence, without differences or otherness. This homogenization of one and the other which are actually different from each other, as well as the identity to which it ends, are due to the magical power of the image it is not easy to realize.But, by the idea of difference and otherness, couldn’t we say that something else begins that inspiration, namely something new? This is the case of Levinas's thought. And yet, the Jew, whose thought is to extend the specificity of the inspiration at a moment to all the moments, prepares a Blanchot’s radicalization of the absence. It is through the language that this radicalization is realized. Language is not a series of words with consistent meaning, but it is above all a series of phonemes and letters. Moreover, this series is not continuity: when each phoneme, by its immediacy, disappears at the same time as it appears, it is totally indifferent to what precedes it and what follows it. It breaks any relation to others at the spatial-temporal level, which means that the series of phonemes is a continuity of the discontinuous. Thus, what man gets through language is not an entity language with significance, but an entity of missing inspirations at every moment, namely an entity of images that have no relations with each other. Our research will then lead us to answer the question of whether the man, before the act of writing / talking and at the time of the act or after the act, is identical. We answer negatively, not that the language confers a new identity to a man, but that it escapes at every moment, that is to say that it has never been any identity, except an identity based on a falsely continuous image
Libros sobre el tema "Blanchot, Maurice (1907-2003) – Phénoménologie"
Bident, Christophe. Maurice Blanchot. Traducido por John McKeane. Fordham University Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.5422/fordham/9780823281763.001.0001.
Texto completoCapítulos de libros sobre el tema "Blanchot, Maurice (1907-2003) – Phénoménologie"
"3. Waiting Maurice Blanchot (1907–2003)". En Last Works, 57–82. Yale University Press, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.12987/9780300231427-005.
Texto completo