Literatura académica sobre el tema "Anatolia centrale"
Crea una cita precisa en los estilos APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard y otros
Consulte las listas temáticas de artículos, libros, tesis, actas de conferencias y otras fuentes académicas sobre el tema "Anatolia centrale".
Junto a cada fuente en la lista de referencias hay un botón "Agregar a la bibliografía". Pulsa este botón, y generaremos automáticamente la referencia bibliográfica para la obra elegida en el estilo de cita que necesites: APA, MLA, Harvard, Vancouver, Chicago, etc.
También puede descargar el texto completo de la publicación académica en formato pdf y leer en línea su resumen siempre que esté disponible en los metadatos.
Artículos de revistas sobre el tema "Anatolia centrale"
Geniş, Evren Y. y Thomas Zimmermann. "Early Bronze Age metalwork in Central Anatolia – An archaeometric view from the hamlet". Praehistorische Zeitschrift 89, n.º 2 (30 de junio de 2014): 280–90. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/pz-2014-0019.
Texto completoAydar, E., A. Gourgaud, C. Deniel, N. Lyberis y N. Gundogdu. "Le volcanisme quaternaire d'Anatolie centrale (Turquie): association de magmatismes calco-alcalin et alcalin en domaine de convergence". Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences 32, n.º 7 (1 de julio de 1995): 1058–69. http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/e95-087.
Texto completoKenar, Nihal, Fatoş Şekerciler y Süleyman Çoban. "The phytosociology, ecology, and plant diversity of new plant communities in Central Anatolia (Turkey)". Hacquetia 19, n.º 1 (1 de junio de 2020): 1–22. http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/hacq-2019-0014.
Texto completoOgden, C. S. y I. D. Bastow. "The crustal structure of the Anatolian Plate from receiver functions and implications for the uplift of the central and eastern Anatolian plateaus". Geophysical Journal International 229, n.º 2 (17 de diciembre de 2021): 1041–62. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggab513.
Texto completoDüring, Bleda S. y Arkadiusz Marciniak. "Households and communities in the central Anatolian Neolithic". Archaeological Dialogues 12, n.º 2 (diciembre de 2005): 165–87. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s138020380600170x.
Texto completoThissen, Laurens. "New Insights in Balkan–Anatolian Connections in the Late Chalcolithic: Old Evidence from the Turkish Black Sea Littoral". Anatolian Studies 43 (diciembre de 1993): 207–37. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3642976.
Texto completoBahar, Hasan. "The Konya region in the Iron Age and its relations with Cilicia". Anatolian Studies 49 (diciembre de 1999): 1–10. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3643058.
Texto completoSamkoff, Aneta. "From Central Asia to Anatolia: the transmission of the black-line technique and the development of pre-Ottoman tilework". Anatolian Studies 64 (2014): 199–215. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s006615461400009x.
Texto completoBikoulis, Peter. "Revisiting prehistoric sites in the Göksu valley: a GIS and social network approach". Anatolian Studies 62 (13 de noviembre de 2012): 35–59. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0066154612000026.
Texto completoŞEN, PINAR ALICI, ABİDİN TEMEL y ALAIN GOURGAUD. "Petrogenetic modelling of Quaternary post-collisional volcanism: a case study of central and eastern Anatolia". Geological Magazine 141, n.º 1 (enero de 2004): 81–98. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0016756803008550.
Texto completoTesis sobre el tema "Anatolia centrale"
Aquilano, Marta <1985>. "Installazioni da fuoco in Anatolia nel Bronzo Antico e Medio : confronti tra le comunità dell’Anatolia centrale e orientale". Doctoral thesis, Università Ca' Foscari Venezia, 2017. http://hdl.handle.net/10579/11979.
Texto completoKülahci, Doğan Gullu Deniz. "Chronological, magmatological and geochemical study of post-collisional basaltic volcanism in Central Anatolia and its spatio-temporal evolution". Thesis, Clermont-Ferrand 2, 2015. http://www.theses.fr/2015CLF22593/document.
Texto completoThis thesis revealed the petrological and geochemical characterization of post-collisional Quaternary basalts of Central Anatolia (Erciyes and Hasandağ stratovolcanoes, and dispersed volcanisms of Obruk-Zengen and Karapınar), focusing on the spatiotemporal evolution of the magmatism in Cappadocia (Turkey). K-Ar geochronology indicated the coexistence of alkaline and calc-alkaline basalts from the same location and age. Moreover, the results also show that these basalts may be very young (a few thousand years). The mineralogy of Quaternary basalts from the Cappadocia is as follows: plagioclase, olivine, clinopyroxene, orthopyroxene and oxides (magnetite, ilmenite). Orthopyroxene is observed only in basalts of Erciyes, while it is lacking in Hasandağ and dispersed volcanisms of Obruk-Zengen and Karapınar. The plagioclase phenocrysts often exhibit disequilibrium features attributed to magma mixing process: complex zoning (normal, inverse, oscillatory), concentric zones rich in melt inclusions, resorption features. However, the observed mineralogy is consistent with a dominant fractional crystallization process. The estimated geobarometer show that the origin of magmas of Erciyes is shallower than the other settings. The results in geochemistry confirm not only the mineralogical duality between Erciyes and the other settings but also the coexistence of alkaline (normative nepheline) and calc-alkaline characters of contemporary basalts. All studied basalts are enriched in LREE (Light Rare Earth Elements) and LILE (Large Ion Lithophile Elements). The isotopic data (Sr, Nd, Pb, O) indicate the importance of enriched lithospheric source. All geochemical data also display the signature of other sources and processes such as contamination by the continental crust and heritage of a former subduction
Patrier, Julie <1983>. "Conservation et stockage des denrées alimentaires en Anatolie centrale au 2. millénaire av. J.-C". Doctoral thesis, Università Ca' Foscari Venezia, 2011. http://hdl.handle.net/10579/1116.
Texto completoI. Subject and scope. It is a truism to say that food was and remains one of the principal concerns of a population, if not its main preoccupation. Still today, the problem of stocks of foodstuffs keeps the markets in flux, and famines in the world are far from having disappeared. These concerns were equally important in Central Anatolia during the second millennium B.C. (periods of the Assyrian, then Hittite merchant colonies in Cappadocia), the context of this thesis, and the study of the conservation and storage of foodstuffs during this period allows us to shed light on the various methods then used. As an archaeologist, I have given priority in my research to archaeological vestiges, but all available documentation has been taken into account, whether it concerns ceramic pots and seals, or involves written sources or data from archaeo-botany, archaeo-zoology, entomology or chemical analyses. This interdisciplinary approach, enabling the most complete view possible, is an absolute necessity for research areas such as this one. The abovementioned data is also supplemented, its interpretation nuanced and deepened by information provided by experimental archaeology and ethno-archaeology. II. Corpus. Since no detailed overview of the subject previously existed, it was first necessary to list all the sites in this zone, and determine which of them possessed storage facilities or information on the conservation of foodstuffs. The complete documentation of the 56 sites inventoried for the geographic and chronological zone was examined (volumes 2 and 3) in the aim of listing and studying in detail both fixed and mobile storage installations. Each facility is discussed and analyzed in its own right, as are all indications or clues as to how it was managed, notably marks on pots and seals. Textual sources having come down to us are both clay tablets written in Akkadian cuneiform or Hittite and inscriptions in Luwian hieroglyphs. To the extent possible, they were inventoried and used. All this data was processed, to the best of our capabilities, according to occupation levels, from the most ancient to the most recent. Each of the sites identified was studied in depth (volume 2) and illustrated (volume 3), presented in alphabetical order using present-day names. Volume 2 is preceded by an introduction explaining the volume’s organisation, the method used to determine the corpus and the difficulties encountered. III. Analysis and synthesis of data. Volume 1, in four parts, is a synthesis of all the data gathered and examined in the documentary corpus. This data is also combined with information from ethno-archaeology and experimental archaeology, supplemented by the comparison with other research domains. III.1. Foodstuffs and preservation methods. The first part deals with the preservation of foodstuffs. Under this heading, we first list available food resources (chapter 1), based both on information found in texts and archaeo-botanical, archaeo-zoological and entomological analyses. Thanks to this data, it is possible to list resources, but in the absence of precise indications it is sometimes difficult to determine what was actually consumed. Factors limiting the conservation of foodstuffs are then studied, in order to determine possible causes of degradation: environmental data, attacks by pests, etc. (chapter 2). Several means can be used to prolong the preservation of foodstuffs, techniques such as drying, smoking, salting, or using various liquids with anti-oxidising properties, even a combination of these techniques (chapter 3). We then present a few case studies within the broad categories of foods: grains, meat and fish, fruits and both alcoholic and non-alcoholic drinks (water, wine, beer, but also milk and its derivatives) (chapter 4). III.2. Analyses of storage facilities. The second part is devoted to the detailed study of storage facilities. Having established a set of definitions, we view each installation from a functional point of view: materials, construction techniques, dimensions, how it works, etc. This enables us to list the specificities of each structure and establish a typology for some (chapter 1). We see that the majority are warehouses and storage rooms, but there are also silos (different modules, the best known being those of the Hittite capital, Boğazköy/Ḫattuša) and underground pits. Other types of installations are most often mentioned in texts as barns or possibly granaries, either because the constructions were not later identified as storage facilities, or because they were located outside the cities and not excavated, or due to the chance element of excavations. The second and last chapter in this part examines the layout to be found in some of these structures as well as the containers, the majority of which are ceramic pots; however, we have not omitted containers made of perishable materials, though they have rarely been preserved in Central Anatolia. They are brought up thanks in particular to textual and ethnographic data, as well as to imprints preserved on the backs of seals. A great deal of attention has been placed on the methodology to be set up for the study of storage containers, in order to identify their function and archaeological visibility, which leads to a disproportion between the different types of containers having come down to us. Given the impossibility of treating all Anatolian pots in detail, we present some case studies. Using a few studies based on textual sources and archaeo-botanical remains discovered in containers, the question arose as to the possibility of matching up ancient names with containers discovered in excavations, but also the foodstuffs with these same containers. Although it is sometimes possible to make certain terms correspond with certain shapes of pot, no recipient seems destined for a single foodstuff – at best, and only in rare cases, for broad categories such as solids or liquids. Finally, a short section attempts to put these containers in their archaeological context and determine the organisation and internal workings of storage spaces. III.3. Protection and management of storage spaces. The third part is devoted to the protection and management of storage spaces. It is in two chapters. The protection and securing of storage installations is first analysed (chapter 1) in terms of two aspects: protection against natural attacks and securing against burglary. The first aspect regroups ways of combating potential deterioration. Several techniques are used, often together, so as to achieve optimum conservation conditions: animal traps, natural insect repellents and insecticides, religious incantations and others. Incantations can also be used against burglaries. In that case, it is preferable to secure access to storage rooms (doors, windows, etc, most often by limiting their number or by providing them with closure devices (seals and locks). Guardians are also employed. A long chapter is devoted to the management of food stocks (chapter 2). It regroups all indications that might enable us to reconstitute how stocks were managed. Administrative practices of the second Anatolian millennium are still not very well known, concerning storage in particular, but also for all aspects linked to food (management of herds, gardens and fields, distribution of rations, etc.). Thus we turn first to the marking of earthenware pottery, as well as to the analysis of some ceramic objects which could have been included in the system, namely “lunulae” (crescent shaped objects, usually perforated at either end). On the condition of a complete and precise study, the place where a seal was discovered enables us to know what was sealed inside the jar and by whom and thus reconstitute part of the internal administrative organization and its relations with the outside world (this is true of course, mainly for large administrative bodies but also on a smaller scale, in the domestic context). Textual sources are examined from the point of view of the agricultural and religious calendar (certain Hittite festivals, known as “seasonal”, included storage installations) and also from the point of view of the personnel linked with foodstuffs (in particular through the analysis of their titles, such as AGRIG, the person in charge of royal stocks during the Hittite era). Finally, the location of storage spaces is again considered, with emphasis on practical aspects of management (filling, for example). III.4. Synthesis. Once catalogued and analysed, data must be put back in its context – at once topographic, on the scale of the city, geographic, on the scale of Central Anatolia, administrative and historic – in order to draw up an inventory, period by period (Old Assyrian, then Hittite), of conservation methods and storage techniques. There is significant disproportion in the data, but there is also a difference in the nature of available documentation for each of the periods, textual in particular. The period of the Assyrian merchant colonies in Cappadocia tells us mainly about private dwellings and archives (particularly in Kültepe, formerly Kaneš), whereas the majority of Hittite texts belong to the religious sphere and we know less about Hittite habitat. In like manner, political and administrative organisation is not exactly similar in the two periods. However, the data consulted was sufficiently complementary and the comparison between the two periods gives us a more precise overview. IV. Conclusion. Given the present state of documentation, the tableau presented here is still only partial. However, this careful examination nonetheless enables us to understand how storage was an integral part of the daily life of the ancient Anatolians, and a feature seemingly omnipresent. It was not possible to detect technical evolutions concerning conservation methods or storage mechanisms, or true geographical particularities. However, the results of this study show clearly that storage facilities and the way they were conceived usually answered to precise needs which were part and parcel of more global modes of thought and organisation. This idea prompts us to examine more closely the fundamental aspects of daily life, and among others, to take storage facilities into account, including simple underground pits, which are sometimes neglected. It is important to see these facilities as more than mere technical installations and to view them from an interdisciplinary point of view: their study provides us with fundamental knowledge much closer to the reality of ancient times in fields as diverse as the history of techniques, urban development or the administrative organisation in Anatolia in the second millennium B.C. This is true for storage, as it is for other areas of daily life as yet insufficiently studied.
I. Problematica e limite della ricerca. E’ un’ovvietà dire che l’alimentazione sia stata e resti una delle preoccupazioni principali di tutte le popolazioni. L’immagazzinamento delle derrate alimentari è ancor oggi un problema all’ordine del giorno dei mercati mondiali e le carestie sono lungi dall’essere scomparse. Preoccupazioni non minori riguardarono le popolazioni dell’Anatolia del II millennio a.C. (il periodo delle colonie assire di Cappadocia), che costituisce il tema di questa tesi. In quanto archeologa, ho concentrato soprattutto la mia attenzione sulla problematica archeologica e sui dati della cultura materiale, ma ho anche preso in considerazione i risultati delle analisi archeobotaniche, archeozoologiche, entomologiche e chimiche. Mi sono anche a lungo soffermata sulle fonti epigrafiche, cercando di dare alla mia ricerca un approccio interdisciplinare. II. Il corpus. L’argomento non è stato prima d’ora trattato da studi di sintesi. Si è dovuto quindi procedere ad una schedatura dettagliata, sito per sito, del materiale per quanto riguarda i dispositivi di stoccaggio e di conservazione dei prodotti alimentari. I dati relativi a 56 siti sono forniti alfabeticamente nei voll. 2 e 3, sia in forma narrativa che in forma grafica e tabellare. I testi cuneiformi pertinenti sono trattati per lo più in traduzione, mettendo in rilievo quando necessario problemi di ordine lessicale e interpretativo. Ciascun dispositivo è stato sottoposto ad analisi specifica, riferendolo anche al tipo di sistema di gestione delle risorse ricostruibile. III. Analisi e sintesi dei dati. Il volume 1, diviso in quattro parti, fornisce la sintesi e le conclusioni dell’intero lavoro, incrociando i dati archeologici ed epigrafici con quelli etnoarcheologici e sperimentali. III.1. Derrate e metodi di conservazione. La prima parte concerne la conservazione dei prodotti alimentari. Si inizia con una presentazione del repertorio delle risorse alimentari disponibili (capitolo 1). Ci si occupa poi dei fattori responsabili del degrado organico e dei limiti di conservazione dei prodotti, dai fattori ambientali agli insetti, ecc. (capitolo 2). Diversi mezzi possono essere utilizzati per prolungare la conservazione di tali prodotti alimentari, come le tecniche di essiccazione, di concimazione, di salatura o l’utilizzazione di diversi liquidi con proprietà antiossidanti, o addirittura una combinazione di parecchie di queste tecniche (capitolo 3). Si propongono da ultimo degli studi di casi, che riguardano le grandi categorie d’alimenti: cereali, latte e suoi derivati, carne, pesci, frutta e bevande (acqua e bevande inebrianti) (capitolo 4). III.2. Analisi dei dispositivi di stoccaggio. La seconda parte della tesi è dedicata all’esame dei dispositivi di stoccaggio. Dopo aver discusso la terminologia e fissato le definizioni tecniche, ogni dispositivo è considerato dal punto di vista funzionale: materiale, tecniche di costruzione, dimensioni, funzionamento ecc. Si arriva così a stabilire la lista dei caratteri specifici di ogni struttura all’interno di una tipologia (capitolo 1). Sono considerati non solo magazzini e generici locali di stoccaggio, ma anche silos e fosse. Altri tipi di dispositivi, attestati unicamente dai testi (fienili o granai) e non identificati sul terreno, vengono ugualmente discussi. Il secondo capitolo di questa parte riguarda lo studio dei contenitori (per lo più di ceramica, ma non solo) e delle sigillature apposte su di essi. Anche qui vengono proposti studi di casi, per l’impossibilità di trattare in modo completo le problematiche della ceramica anatolica di secondo millennio. Ci si sofferma tra l’altro sulla nomenclatura dei recipienti nelle fonti testuali, proponendo alcune ipotesi di identificazione. Anche quando l’identificazione è possibile o probabile, si riscontra tuttavia la pratica di utilizzare lo stesso tipo di contenitore per diversi prodotti alimentari. Infine, in una breve parte finale si tenta di collocare questi contenitori nel loro contesto archeologico e di determinare l’organizzazione e la disposizione interna degli spazi di stoccaggio. III.3. Protezione e gestione degli spazi di stoccaggio. La terza parte è dedicata allo studio della gestione e protezione degli spazi di stoccaggio. La protezione e la sicurezza dei magazzini sono analizzate da due punti di vista (capitolo 1): la protezione contro gli attacchi naturali e la sicurezza contro i furti. Diverse tecniche di difesa sono utilizzate, spesso in modo congiunto, per creare condizioni ottimali di conservazione: dalle trappole per animali, agli insetticidi naturali, agli incantesimi. Gli incantesimi possono essere anche utilizzati come modo di lotta contro i furti. La sicurezza è ricercata attraverso la limitazione di porte e finestre, che vengono per lo più muniti di dispositivi di chiusura (sigillatura e chiavistello). Un lungo capitolo è poi dedicato alle gestione dei prodotti alimentari (capitolo 2). Le pratiche amministrative del secondo millennio in Anatolia sono ancora relativamente mal conosciute, sia per quanto riguarda la gestione diretta degli alimenti, sia altri aspetti ad essa legati (gestione degli animali, dei giardini e dei campi, distribuzione delle razioni ecc.). I marchi apposti sulle giare costituiscono uno degli elementi di riflessione. Ma vi sono anche altri materiali discussi, come le falci di luna miniaturizzate in ceramica e, naturalmente, le sigillature. La disposizione delle sigillature al momento della loro scoperta permette infatti -- a condizione che vi sia un rilievo preciso -- di determinare quello che era sigillato e per conto di chi; e così di ricostituire una parte dell’organizzazione amministrativa interna e dei suoi rapporti con l’esterno. Dalle fonti testuali ittite si ricavano in proposito molte informazioni, a cui si aggiungono quelle sul calendario agricolo e religioso e sul personale addetto ai prodotti alimentari (per es. l’ AGRIG, responsabile dei magazzini reali). III.4. Sintesi. Una volta catalogati e analizzati, i dati devono essere rimessi nel loro contesto, tanto topografico, alla scala della città, geografico, alla scala dell’Anatolia centrale, che amministrativo e storico allo scopo di stabilire un bilancio, periodo per periodo (prima il periodo paleo assiriano poi il periodo ittita) dei metodi di conservazione e delle tecniche di stoccaggio. Si osserva una grande sproporzione nei dati ma anche, per ogni periodo, una differenza nelle natura della documentazione disponibile soprattutto al livello testuale. Infatti il periodo dei fondachi assiriani della Cappadocia ha messo in evidenza principalmente delle abitazioni e degli archivi privati (a Kültepe, l’antica Kanes soprattutto) allora che i testi del dominio ittita appartengono in maggior parte alla sfera religiosa che l’abitazione ittita ci é conosciuta meno bene. Del resto l’organizzazione politica e amministrativa dei due periodi non é del tutto simile. Nonostante ciò i dati consultati sono abbastanza complementari e il paragone fra i due periodi permette di avere una visione d’insieme più precisa. IV. Conclusione. Nello stato attuale della documentazione il quadro presentato é ancora parziale, ma questo esame approfondito permette di capire in che modo lo stoccaggio si integrava nella vita quotidiana degli antichi Anatoliani. E pare che lo stoccaggio sia stato presente ovunque. Non é stato possibile scoprire le evoluzioni tecniche relative ai metodi di conservazione o ai dispositivi di stoccaggio, né delle vere e proprie particolarità geografiche. Ciò nonostante i risultati di questo studio dimostrano chiaramente che la presenza di installazioni di stoccaggio e il modo con cui sono state concepite rispondono a dei bisogni precisi che si inscrivono generalmente in modi di pensiero e di organizzazione globali. Questa riflessione ci spinge dunque a considerare con maggior profondità gli aspetti fondamentali della vita quotidiana e più specialmente a prendere in considerazione le sistemazioni di stoccaggio, comprese le semplici fosse talvolta trascurate. Bisogna imparare a considerare questi dispositivi non solo come semplici installazioni tecniche ma anche da un punto di vista interdisciplinare. Infatti il loro studio permette di stabilire i fondamenti di une conoscenza molto più vicina alla realtà antica in domini tanto diversi quanto la storia delle tecniche, l’urbanistica o ancora l’organizzazione amministrativa dell’Anatolia durante il II millennio avanti Cristo. Questo é vero per lo stoccaggio ma ugualmente per altri domini della vita quotidiana ancora troppo poco evocati.
Vergnaud, Baptiste. "Recherches sur les fortifications d'Anatolie occidentale et centrale au début du premier millénaire av. J.-C. (Xe-VIe s.)". Phd thesis, Université Michel de Montaigne - Bordeaux III, 2012. http://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-00802897.
Texto completoYoruk, Ebru. "Composition Of Atmosphere At The Central Anatolia". Master's thesis, METU, 2004. http://etd.lib.metu.edu.tr/upload/12604725/index.pdf.
Texto completowhereas, soil component has dominating contribution on observed concentrations of V, Mg, Ca and K. SO42-/(SO2+SO42-) ratio observed in Ç
ubuk station indicates that contribution of distant sources is more important than the contribution of local sources on observed SO42- levels. SO42-/NO3- ratio calculations showed that Central Anatolia is receipt of SO42- from Eastern European countries. Positive Matrix Factorization (PMF) analysis revealed 6 source groups, namely motor vehicle source, mixed urban factor, long range transport factor, soil factor, NO3- factor and Cd factor. Distribution of Potential Source Contribution Function (PSCF) values showed that main source areas of SO42-, NH4+ and Cd are western parts of Turkey, Balkan countries, central and western Europe, central Russian Federation and north of Sweden and Finland
NO3- are the regions located around the Mediterranean Sea
and there is no very strong potential source area observed for NH3 and Pb.
Gulyuz, Erhan. "Evolution Of The Cicekdagi Basin, Central Anatolia, Turkey". Master's thesis, METU, 2009. http://etd.lib.metu.edu.tr/upload/12611469/index.pdf.
Texto completoiç
ekdagi basin developed on the Central Anatolian Crystalline Complex (CACC) is a foreland basin developed as the southern integral part of the Ç
ankiri Basin during the Late Paleocene to middle Oligocene. The basin has two compartments separated by the Ç
iç
ekdagi High comprises two sedimentary cycles. The oldest cycle comprises Barakli, Kocaç
ay and Bogazkö
y formationsa and is exposed both in the northern and the southern sectors. They were deposited in marine conditions. The second cycle comprises incik and Gü
vendik formations and was deposited in continental settings. The first cycle comprises uniformly south-directed paleocurrent directions in both the northern and southern sectors whereas the second cycle deposits are represented by south-directed directions in the southern sector, and bimodal directions in the northern sector. In addition, the second cycle formations contain progressive unconformities and coarsening upwards sequences indicative of thrusting. Internal structures of the units and paleostress data indicate that the basin experienced over-all compression and local extension due to flexural bending. This gave way to inversion of some of the normal faults and uplift of the Ç
iç
ekdagi High during the deposition of second cycle in the Late Eocene to middle Oligocene time which subsequently resulted in compartmentalization of the basin.
Sayin, M. Naci. "Fairy Chimney Development In Cappadocian Ignimbrites (central Anatolia, Turkey)". Phd thesis, METU, 2008. http://etd.lib.metu.edu.tr/upload/12609451/index.pdf.
Texto completoy ignimbrites. Field measurements are taken from the fairy chimneys to quantify the shape and the size. Slope of the selected areas are identified to investigate the most suitable topography. Analysis have shown that fairy chimneys have basal diameters ranging from 9.7 to 13.7 m, with heights in the range from 8.41 to 21.73 m. The slopes of fairy chimneys are 60 to 70 degrees with a slight asymmetry towards the upslope. The chimneys are sligthy rounded due to the erosion in the slope direction. Distances between the fairy chimneys change from a minimum of 5.45 m for Zelve and 42.72 m for Kavak chimneys. Fairy chimneys are developed in two stages. The first stage is the generation of topography suitable for the formation of fairy chimneys. Three main factors in this stage are degree of welding, thickness of ignimbrite and topographic slope. In the second stage, several local features contribute for the final shaping of the chimneys.
Binzat, Okan Kaan. "Revision Of Vicia L. (leguminosae) In Central Anatolia, Turkey". Phd thesis, METU, 2012. http://etd.lib.metu.edu.tr/upload/12615083/index.pdf.
Texto completoIlbeyli, Nurdane. "Petrogenesis of collision-related plutonic rocks, central Anatolia(Turkey)". Thesis, Durham University, 1998. http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/4889/.
Texto completoPereira, Thiago Nilton Alves. "Anatomia encefálica comparada de Characiformes (Teleostei: Ostariophysi)". Universidade de São Paulo, 2014. http://www.teses.usp.br/teses/disponiveis/59/59139/tde-18122014-143500/.
Texto completoCharaciformes comprises about 1.700 formally described species inhabiting the Neotropical region and three exclusives families of sub-Saharan Etiopic. The species of the order have herbivorous, carnivorous and detritivores feeding habits, being an order of several ecological habits. The formal classification of the families of the order is based almost exclusively on osteological characters and very few of characters of other types are used to establish phylogenetic hypotheses in the group. Thus, the present study of brain morphological complex aims to fill this gap represented by the absence of new morphological characters of another nature that might contribute to a better understanding of the relationships among the Characiformes. Thus, the present study had as main objectives the description and illustration of external brain morphology of representatives of all the families of Characiformes and the searching for phylogenetically informative encephalic morphological characters. For this, 52 terminal taxa and 42 brain characters were examined, in addition of brain data set, have been examined 126 osteological characters that define the main groups of Characiformes. The behavior of brain characters was mapped through a parsimony analysis, thus helping to sustain several phylogenetic arrangements of Characiformes. Some new phylogenetic arrangements were obtained, such as: the sister-group relationship between Hemiodontidae + Chalceidae; Cynodontidae + Acestrorhynchidae as clade-sisters of Erythrinoidea; Gasteropelecidae + Triportheidae + Bryconidae forming a monophyletic group; Crenuchidae as sister group of Characidae. In addition to these relationships, we corroboratethe elevation of some subfamilies of Characidae to family status, such as Acestrorhynchidae, Bryconidae, Cynodontidae, Iguanodectidae and Triportheidae. The Characidae family having Heterocharacinae as the most basal clade and sustained mainly by osteological characters, plus an exclusive character of brain nature. Aphyoditeinae + Aphyocharacinae related to Cheirodontinae and, Characinae subfamily as a monophyletic group.
Libros sobre el tema "Anatolia centrale"
Strabo. Geografia: Caucaso, Asia centrale e Anatolia : libri XI-XII. Milano: Biblioteca universale Rizzoli, 2000.
Buscar texto completoFrappi, Carlo y Aldo Ferrari. Armenia, Caucaso, Asia Centrale. Venice: Edizioni Ca' Foscari, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.30687/978-88-6969-279-6.
Texto completoFerrari, Aldo, Elena Pupulin, Marco Ruffilli y Vittorio Tomelleri. Armenia, Caucaso e Asia Centrale. Venice: Edizioni Ca' Foscari, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.30687/978-88-6969-211-6.
Texto completoComai, Giorgio, Carlo Frappi, Giovanni Pedrini y Elena Rova. Armenia, Caucaso e Asia Centrale. Venice: Edizioni Ca' Foscari, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.30687/978-88-6969-340-3.
Texto completoFrappi, Carlo y Fabio Indeo. Monitoring Central Asia and the Caspian Area. Venice: Edizioni Ca' Foscari, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.30687/978-88-6969-376-2.
Texto completoKaymakci, Nuretdin. Tectono-stratigraphical evolution of the Çankiri Basin (Central Anatolia, Turkey) =: Tectono-stratigrafische evolutie van het Çankiri Bekken (centraal Anatolië, Turkije). [Utrecht]: Faculteit Aardwetenschappen, Universiteit Utrecht, 2000.
Buscar texto completoKaymakci, Nuretdin. Tectono-stratigraphical evolution of the Çankiri Basin (Central Anatolia, Turkey) =: Tectono-stratigrafische evolutie van het Çankiri Bekken (centraal Anatolië, Turkije). [Utrecht]: Faculteit Aardwetenschappen, Universiteit Utrecht, 2000.
Buscar texto completoKaymakci, Nuretdin. Tectono-stratigraphical evolution of the Çankiri Basin (Central Anatolia, Turkey) =: Tectono-stratigrafische evolutie van het Çankiri Bekken (centraal Anatolië, Turkije). [Utrecht]: Faculteit Aardwetenschappen, Universiteit Utrecht, 2000.
Buscar texto completoPeter, Daners, Andriesse Els, Bakker Bert (Egbertus) 1954- y Krijnen Paul 1944-, eds. Turkije: West-Turkije, Centraal-Anatolië. Den Haag: ANWB, 2011.
Buscar texto completoD'agostino, Anacleto, Valentina Orsi y Giulia Torri, eds. Sacred Landscapes of Hittites and Luwians. Florence: Firenze University Press, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.36253/978-88-6655-904-7.
Texto completoCapítulos de libros sobre el tema "Anatolia centrale"
Nieuwenhuys, Rudolf, Jan Voogd, Christiaan van Huijzen y Michele Papa. "Anatomia macroscopica". En Il sistema nervoso centrale, 67–93. Milano: Springer Milan, 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-1140-3_3.
Texto completoKürschner, Harald y Gerald Parolly. "The Central Anatolian Steppe". En Plant and Vegetation, 149–71. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-3886-7_4.
Texto completoten Donkelaar, Hans J., Peter van Domburg y Ton van der Vliet. "Het centrale zenuwstelsel". En Klinische anatomie en embryologie, 690–802. Houten: Bohn Stafleu van Loghum, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-90-368-1627-4_10.
Texto completoBesler, Serpil, O. Mete Kockar, Ayse E. Putun, Ekrem Ekinci y Ersan Putun. "Pyrolysis of Euphorbia Rigida from Central Anatolia". En Advances in Thermochemical Biomass Conversion, 1103–9. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 1993. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-1336-6_85.
Texto completod'Alfonso, Lorenzo y Nathan Lovejoy. "Rulership and the Gods: The Role of Cultic Institutions in the Late Bronze to Iron Age Transition in Anatolia and Northern Syria". En Studia Asiana, 177–214. Florence: Firenze University Press, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.36253/979-12-215-0042-4.11.
Texto completoLoewy, A. D. "Anatomic Aspects of Central Nervous Cardiovascular Regulation". En Central Nervous System Control of the Heart, 3–18. Boston, MA: Springer US, 1986. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-2327-3_1.
Texto completoBayarı, C. Serdar, N. Nur Özyurt, A. Koray Törk, Pınar Avcı, İ. Noyan Güner y Emrah Pekkan. "Geodynamic Control of Hypogene Karst Development in Central Anatolia, Turkey". En Hypogene Karst Regions and Caves of the World, 449–62. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-53348-3_27.
Texto completoKeskinkilic, Ender, Saeid Pournaderi, Ahmet Geveci y Yavuz A. Topkaya. "A Study on the Characterization of Nickel Laterites of Central Anatolia". En 7th International Symposium on High-Temperature Metallurgical Processing, 403–10. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-48093-0_50.
Texto completoKeskinkilic, Ender, Saeid Pournaderi, Ahmet Geveci y Yavuz A. Topkaya. "A Study on the Characterization of Nickel Laterites of Central Anatolia". En 7th International Symposium on High-Temperature Metallurgical Processing, 403–10. Hoboken, NJ, USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9781119274643.ch50.
Texto completoRoksandic, Mirjana. "The Role of the Central Balkans in the Peopling of Europe: Paleoanthropological Evidence". En Paleoanthropology of the Balkans and Anatolia, 15–33. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-0874-4_2.
Texto completoActas de conferencias sobre el tema "Anatolia centrale"
Uyaroglu, Dilan Gizem y Ibrahim Çemen. "STRUCTURAL EVOLUTION OF THE CENTRAL TUZGOLU BASIN, CENTRAL ANATOLIA, TURKEY". En GSA Annual Meeting in Indianapolis, Indiana, USA - 2018. Geological Society of America, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1130/abs/2018am-321271.
Texto completoCampbell, Clay, Michael H. Taylor, Faruk Ocakoğlu, Alexis Licht, Megan A. Mueller y Andreas Möller. "DID THE CENTRAL ANATOLIAN CANKIRI BASIN FORM AS A RESULT OF AN OLIGO-MIOCENE RAYLEIGH-TAYLOR INSTABILITY? IMPLICATIONS FOR EARLY MIOCENE PLATEAU DEVELOPMENT IN CENTRAL ANATOLIA". En GSA Annual Meeting in Phoenix, Arizona, USA - 2019. Geological Society of America, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1130/abs/2019am-338731.
Texto completoÇıvgın, B. y B. Kaypak. "Crustal Structure beneath Central Anatolia from Receiver Functions". En 8th Congress of the Balkan Geophysical Society. Netherlands: EAGE Publications BV, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.201414235.
Texto completoSelçuk Peköz, Arif y Kerim Koçak. "OUTLINES OF THE ÇAYIRBAĞI OPHIOLITES OF KONYA (CENTRAL ANATOLIA)". En 5th INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC CONFERENCE GEOBALCANICA 2019. Geobalcanica Society, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.18509/gbp.2019.02.
Texto completoTukel, Fatma, Mehmet Keskin y Ercan Aldanmaz. "VOLCANOLOGICAL MAP OF THE KARACADAĞ VOLCANIC COMPLEX, CENTRAL ANATOLIA, TURKEY". En GSA 2020 Connects Online. Geological Society of America, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1130/abs/2020am-357144.
Texto completoGullu, Bahattin. "RAMAN CHARACTERISTICS OF GUCUNKAYA (AKSARAY) GABBROIC ROCKS, CENTRAL ANATOLIA-TURKEY". En 19th SGEM International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference EXPO Proceedings. STEF92 Technology, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.5593/sgem2019/1.1/s01.058.
Texto completoKizilkoca, R., A. Aydemir, A. Gencer, A. Ercan, M. S. Ugur y M. H. Gumus. "Unconventional Potential of the Interior Basins of Turkey; Central Anatolia". En 19th International Petroleum and Natural Gas Congress and Exhibition of Turkey. European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609-pdb.380.86.
Texto completo"Hydrogeological Features of The Gökgöl Lake (Kulu, Konya-Central Anatolia)". En Dec. 14-16, 2016 Pattaya. Dignified Researchers Publication, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.15242/dirpub.dir1216228.
Texto completoCampbell, Clay, Michael H. Taylor, Megan Mueller, Alexis Licht, Faruk Ocakoglu, Andreas Möller y K. Christopher Beard. "THE PHYSIOGRAPHIC RESPONSE TO CENOZOIC DRIP TECTONICS IN CENTRAL ANATOLIA". En GSA Connects 2021 in Portland, Oregon. Geological Society of America, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1130/abs/2021am-370539.
Texto completoKORALAY, Tamer. "MINERAL CHEMISTRY OF OPHIOLITIC GABBROS WITHIN CENTRAL ANATOLIA: HIRFANLI DAM GABBROS". En 19th SGEM International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference EXPO Proceedings. STEF92 Technology, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.5593/sgem2019/1.1/s01.041.
Texto completoInformes sobre el tema "Anatolia centrale"
López Núñez, Álvaro José. Anatomía ósea para estudiantes. Ediciones Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia, noviembre de 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.16925/gcgp.34.
Texto completoSaldanha, Ian J., Wangnan Cao, Justin M. Broyles, Gaelen P. Adam, Monika Reddy Bhuma, Shivani Mehta, Laura S. Dominici, Andrea L. Pusic y Ethan M. Balk. Breast Reconstruction After Mastectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ), julio de 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.23970/ahrqepccer245.
Texto completo