Literatura académica sobre el tema "Agency"
Crea una cita precisa en los estilos APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard y otros
Consulte las listas temáticas de artículos, libros, tesis, actas de conferencias y otras fuentes académicas sobre el tema "Agency".
Junto a cada fuente en la lista de referencias hay un botón "Agregar a la bibliografía". Pulsa este botón, y generaremos automáticamente la referencia bibliográfica para la obra elegida en el estilo de cita que necesites: APA, MLA, Harvard, Vancouver, Chicago, etc.
También puede descargar el texto completo de la publicación académica en formato pdf y leer en línea su resumen siempre que esté disponible en los metadatos.
Artículos de revistas sobre el tema "Agency"
Oliver, Pamela E. "Black Agency, White Agency". Contemporary Sociology: A Journal of Reviews 45, n.º 5 (septiembre de 2016): 543–46. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0094306116664522.
Texto completoMASSA, RUBENS MUSSOLIN, RAUL BEAL PARTYKA y JEFERSON LANA. "Pesquisa e teoria da agência comportamental: uma revisão e agenda de pesquisa". Cadernos EBAPE.BR 18, n.º 2 (junio de 2020): 220–36. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1679-395177017.
Texto completoSteward, Helen. "Agency Incompatibilism and Divine Agency". European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 7, n.º 3 (23 de septiembre de 2015): 67–78. http://dx.doi.org/10.24204/ejpr.v7i3.105.
Texto completoHerr, Ranjoo Seodu. "Agency without autonomy: valuational agency". Journal of Global Ethics 6, n.º 3 (diciembre de 2010): 239–54. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17449626.2010.524797.
Texto completoHacker, Hanna. "agency@?" Figurationen 8, n.º 2 (julio de 2007): 122–24. http://dx.doi.org/10.7788/figurationen.2007.8.2.122.
Texto completoSimester, A. P. "Agency". Law and Philosophy 15, n.º 2 (1996): 159. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3504828.
Texto completoKockelman, Paul. "Agency". Current Anthropology 48, n.º 3 (junio de 2007): 375–401. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/512998.
Texto completoWise, M. Norton. "Agency". Isis 107, n.º 4 (diciembre de 2016): 781–84. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/689765.
Texto completoMiller, Margaret A. "Agency". Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning 42, n.º 1 (enero de 2010): 4–5. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00091380903479323.
Texto completoAhearn, Laura M. "Agency". Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 9, n.º 1-2 (junio de 1999): 12–15. http://dx.doi.org/10.1525/jlin.1999.9.1-2.12.
Texto completoTesis sobre el tema "Agency"
d'Inverno, Mark. "Agents, agency and autonomy : a formal computational model". Thesis, University College London (University of London), 1998. http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.586863.
Texto completoCampbell, Peter G. "Rational agency". Thesis, University of British Columbia, 1988. http://hdl.handle.net/2429/28592.
Texto completoArts, Faculty of
Philosophy, Department of
Graduate
Pulman, C. G. "Manifest agency". Thesis, University of Reading, 2010. http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.542274.
Texto completoGibb, Alexander James. "Peer agency". Thesis, University of Birmingham, 2004. http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.423623.
Texto completoSantos, Elder Rizzon. "Creative agency". reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFRGS, 2010. http://hdl.handle.net/10183/28359.
Texto completoThis PhD thesis describes an interdisciplinary research on computational creativity and cognitive agents. Our motivation to integrate these two areas is to study the human skill that uses previous experiences and knowledge to solve unpredicted problems and situations. Imbued by that motivation, our purpose is to improve the applicability of the agent’s knowledge, inspired in the way that we humans understand and experience the world. Our approach towards that research view is to adopt theories and results from cognitive and neural sciences as the grounding to a computational model of agents capable of acting creatively. Thus, we adopt the concept blending theory (FAUCONNIER; TURNER, 1998) – that originated from cognitive linguistics and theory of the mind – as the grounding of our model. Therefore, our proposal of creative agents integrates an implementation of concept blending into a BDI structure. In concrete terms, we use Jason’s implementation of AgentSpeak to manipulate the agent’s theoretical (beliefs) and practical (desires and intentions) reasoning. Hence, the main topic of study of this research is the utilization of concept blending in a structure of intelligent agents. Consequently, we observe our contributions under two perspectives. Regarding computational creativity, we specify a model for concept blending that explicitly defines rules to represent a blending typology. Furthermore, integrating a BDI structure to the model allows the automated construction of inputs and domain information to feed the blending process. Focusing on agents, our contribution is on the process of creative reasoning applied to supply alternative ways to use practical and theoretical knowledge. Given the blending specification defined here, it is possible to integrate different adaptation strategies to handle intention failure or other adaptation scenarios. Another feature is the possibility to work with different knowledge representations given its descriptive logics (using the OWL language) definition. The blending specification is also applied to model the reasoning of an educational recommender system. Finally, the defined model represents an initial work towards a cognition model where blending, agency and other cognitive operations (e.g. learning) interact together to simulate different features of the human thinking.
Evans, Zack. "Intentional agency". Thesis, University of Warwick, 2016. http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/88724/.
Texto completoMorton, Julien. "Against Agency". Thesis, University of Sussex, 2010. http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.508971.
Texto completoDias, St?phane Rodrigues. "Agency via dialogue : a pragmatic, dialogue-based approach to agents". Pontif?cia Universidade Cat?lica do Rio Grande do Sul, 2016. http://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/handle/tede/6589.
Texto completoMade available in DSpace on 2016-04-13T17:47:33Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 TES_STEPHANE_RODRIGUES_DIAS_COMPLETO.pdf: 8895639 bytes, checksum: 96e0d46e8d9b7eb65227ddd9accee191 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2016-01-22
Coordena??o de Aperfei?oamento de Pessoal de N?vel Superior - CAPES
Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Desenvolvimento Cient?fico e Tecnol?gico - CNPq
This work addresses human communicative agency. The competence to instantiate a set of communicative procedures is taken as a component of human rationality that meets a key role of regulating our cognitive environment (a set of mental states, centrally assumptions and emotions), in order to maximize practical goals and sociability. The linguistic-inferential approach offered here for such scope of rationality covers two levels: cognitive and practical, treated hierarchically, according to the assumed regulations. We consider that the cognitive apparatus (the inferential, representational and metarepresentational basis), along with the linguistic apparatus (computation plus interpretable expressions), allows us to operate from the most basic levels of linguistic processing to higher levels (where agents consider assumptions about other minds). In the practical domain, we consider that the linguistic and communicative behavior is used by agents to affect mental states and others? courses of action, thus being in the basis of our social cognition. In this scenario, we not only interact with agents, but we also create a social agency via language. We, therefore, consider a communicative agency framework in which acts are performed within a dialogical structure. The general thesis is that communication requires the use of skills that incorporate practical rationality parameters. This regulation would be dependent on a cognitive and practical structure of agency in which human cognition represents three types of agents: individuals, group members and groups (collectives or representatives). Each of these levels presents characteristic features of communicative agency. In all of them, however, there is the possibility of disagreement among agents, cognitive or practical, in dialogue situations. We illustrate this aspect with a scenario of conflict between agents that are supposed to reach a peace agreement. The illustrative analysis focuses on real negotiation dialogues between group members and representatives of the State of Israel and of Palestine. We observe how practical goals of agents of these types regulate their cognitive and dialogical goals. As a result, we present an alternative proposal to the standard scenario of negotiation, or conflict mediation. As a theoretical benefit, ad hoc pragmatic issues (relevance to the individual qua agent, conflicts between agents) are given prominence and effective treatment. As a practical benefit, the model can be applied to the area of conflict mediation, given the downsizing of a biosocial disposition: our cognitive states are particularly affected by stimuli from a class of agents (artists), with potential effect on individual and collective agencies.
Este trabalho tem como tema ag?ncia comunicativa humana. A compet?ncia para instanciar um conjunto de procedimentos comunicativos ? tomada como um componente da racionalidade humana que cumpre a fun??o central de regula??o de nosso ambiente cognitivo (um conjunto de estados mentais, destacadamente suposi??es e emo??es) tendo em vista maximizar metas pr?ticas e sociabilidade. A abordagem lingu?stico-inferencial desse escopo de racionalidade que oferecemos abarca dois n?veis: cognitivo e pr?tico, tratados hierarquicamente em fun??o das regula??es supostas. Primeiramente, consideramos que o aparato cognitivo (base inferencial, representacional e matarrepresentacional), junto com o aparato lingu?stico (computa??o mais express?es interpret?veis), nos permite operar do n?vel mais b?sico de processamento lingu?stico a n?veis mais altos (em que se consideram suposi??es sobre outras mentes). No dom?nio pr?tico, por sua vez, consideramos que o comportamento lingu?stico-comunicativo ? usado por agentes para agir sobre estados mentais e/ou cursos de a??o de outros, estando na base de nossa cogni??o social. Nesse dom?nio, n?o apenas interagimos com agentes como tamb?m criamos uma ag?ncia social via linguagem. Consideramos, assim, um quadro de ag?ncia comunicativa em que atos s?o performados dentro de uma estrutura dial?gica. A tese geral ? a de que a comunica??o exige o uso de habilidades que incorporam par?metros de racionalidade pr?tica. Essa regula??o estaria dependente de uma estrutura cognitiva e pr?tica de ag?ncia, segundo a qual a cogni??o humana representaria agentes de tr?s tipos: indiv?duos, membros de grupos (integrantes) e grupos (agentes coletivos ou representantes). Cada um desses n?veis apresenta tra?os de ag?ncia comunicativa caracter?sticos. Em todos eles, por?m, h? a possibilidade do desacordo, cognitivo ou pr?tico, em situa??es de di?logo. Ilustramos esse quadro com um cen?rio de conflito entre agentes que supostamente visam a chegar a um acordo de paz. A an?lise ilustrativa se foca em di?logos reais de negocia??o entre membros de grupos e representantes do Estado de Israel e da Palestina que est?o encarregados do processo de paz. Observamos como os objetivos pr?ticos de agentes desses tipos regulam seus objetivos cognitivos e dial?gicos. Como consequ?ncia, apresentamos uma proposta alternativa ao cen?rio padr?o de negocia??o, ou media??o de conflito. Como benef?cio te?rico, quest?es pragm?ticas ad hoc (relev?ncia para indiv?duo qua agente, conflitos entre agentes) recebem tratamento e destaque. Como benef?cio pr?tico, o modelo pode ser aplicado na ?rea de media??o de conflitos, dado o redimensionamento de uma disposi??o biossocial: nossos estados cognitivos s?o particularmente afetados por est?mulos de agentes de uma categoria (artistas), com potencial efeito sobre ag?ncias individuais e coletivas.
Dias, Stéphane Rodrigues. "Agency via dialogue: a pragmatic, dialogue-based approach to agents". Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul, 2016. http://hdl.handle.net/10923/8042.
Texto completoThis work addresses human communicative agency. The competence to instantiate a set of communicative procedures is taken as a component of human rationality that meets a key role of regulating our cognitive environment (a set of mental states, centrally assumptions and emotions), in order to maximize practical goals and sociability. The linguistic-inferential approach offered here for such scope of rationality covers two levels: cognitive and practical, treated hierarchically, according to the assumed regulations. We consider that the cognitive apparatus (the inferential, representational and metarepresentational basis), along with the linguistic apparatus (computation plus interpretable expressions), allows us to operate from the most basic levels of linguistic processing to higher levels (where agents consider assumptions about other minds). In the practical domain, we consider that the linguistic and communicative behavior is used by agents to affect mental states and others’ courses of action, thus being in the basis of our social cognition. In this scenario, we not only interact with agents, but we also create a social agency via language. We, therefore, consider a communicative agency framework in which acts are performed within a dialogical structure. The general thesis is that communication requires the use of skills that incorporate practical rationality parameters. This regulation would be dependent on a cognitive and practical structure of agency in which human cognition represents three types of agents: individuals, group members and groups (collectives or representatives).Each of these levels presents characteristic features of communicative agency. In all of them, however, there is the possibility of disagreement among agents, cognitive or practical, in dialogue situations. We illustrate this aspect with a scenario of conflict between agents that are supposed to reach a peace agreement. The illustrative analysis focuses on real negotiation dialogues between group members and representatives of the State of Israel and of Palestine. We observe how practical goals of agents of these types regulate their cognitive and dialogical goals. As a result, we present an alternative proposal to the standard scenario of negotiation, or conflict mediation. As a theoretical benefit, ad hoc pragmatic issues (relevance to the individual qua agent, conflicts between agents) are given prominence and effective treatment. As a practical benefit, the model can be applied to the area of conflict mediation, given the downsizing of a biosocial disposition: our cognitive states are particularly affected by stimuli from a class of agents (artists), with potential effect on individual and collective agencies.
Este trabalho tem como tema agência comunicativa humana. A competência para instanciar um conjunto de procedimentos comunicativos é tomada como um componente da racionalidade humana que cumpre a função central de regulação de nosso ambiente cognitivo (um conjunto de estados mentais, destacadamente suposições e emoções) tendo em vista maximizar metas práticas e sociabilidade. A abordagem linguístico-inferencial desse escopo de racionalidade que oferecemos abarca dois níveis: cognitivo e prático, tratados hierarquicamente em função das regulações supostas. Primeiramente, consideramos que o aparato cognitivo (base inferencial, representacional e matarrepresentacional), junto com o aparato linguístico (computação mais expressões interpretáveis), nos permite operar do nível mais básico de processamento linguístico a níveis mais altos (em que se consideram suposições sobre outras mentes). No domínio prático, por sua vez, consideramos que o comportamento linguístico-comunicativo é usado por agentes para agir sobre estados mentais e/ou cursos de ação de outros, estando na base de nossa cognição social. Nesse domínio, não apenas interagimos com agentes como também criamos uma agência social via linguagem. Consideramos, assim, um quadro de agência comunicativa em que atos são performados dentro de uma estrutura dialógica. A tese geral é a de que a comunicação exige o uso de habilidades que incorporam parâmetros de racionalidade prática. Essa regulação estaria dependente de uma estrutura cognitiva e prática de agência, segundo a qual a cognição humana representaria agentes de três tipos: indivíduos, membros de grupos (integrantes) e grupos (agentes coletivos ou representantes).Cada um desses níveis apresenta traços de agência comunicativa característicos. Em todos eles, porém, há a possibilidade do desacordo, cognitivo ou prático, em situações de diálogo. Ilustramos esse quadro com um cenário de conflito entre agentes que supostamente visam a chegar a um acordo de paz. A análise ilustrativa se foca em diálogos reais de negociação entre membros de grupos e representantes do Estado de Israel e da Palestina que estão encarregados do processo de paz. Observamos como os objetivos práticos de agentes desses tipos regulam seus objetivos cognitivos e dialógicos. Como consequência, apresentamos uma proposta alternativa ao cenário padrão de negociação, ou mediação de conflito. Como benefício teórico, questões pragmáticas ad hoc (relevância para indivíduo qua agente, conflitos entre agentes) recebem tratamento e destaque. Como benefício prático, o modelo pode ser aplicado na área de mediação de conflitos, dado o redimensionamento de uma disposição biossocial: nossos estados cognitivos são particularmente afetados por estímulos de agentes de uma categoria (artistas), com potencial efeito sobre agências individuais e coletivas.
Aguilar, Jesús H. "Agency and control". Thesis, McGill University, 2003. http://digitool.Library.McGill.CA:80/R/?func=dbin-jump-full&object_id=82814.
Texto completoLibros sobre el tema "Agency"
Webb, Rick. Agency. New York: Palgrave Macmillan US, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-50122-6.
Texto completoMcNamara, Jay. Agency. Sebastian, Fla: Possibilities Press, 1995.
Buscar texto completoAlex, Roney, ed. Appointing commercial agents in Europe: The essential facts. Chichester: Wiley, 1996.
Buscar texto completoCampaign, ed. Choosing an agency: Finding an agency. London: [Haymarket Campaign], 1993.
Buscar texto completoPollack, Rachel. Temporary agency. London: Orbit, 1995.
Buscar texto completoKalim, Mazhar. Crown agency. Multan: Yusuf Brothers, 1990.
Buscar texto completoHarris, Dan. Creative Agency. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-77434-9.
Texto completoSharov, Alexei y Morten Tønnessen. Semiotic Agency. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-89484-9.
Texto completoKnappett, Carl y Lambros Malafouris, eds. Material Agency. Boston, MA: Springer US, 2008. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-74711-8.
Texto completoPowers, John E. Agency adjudications. College Station: Texas Engineering Extension Service, Texas A&M University System, 1990.
Buscar texto completoCapítulos de libros sobre el tema "Agency"
Roberts, John. "Agency without Agents". En Belief and Organization, 144–62. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9781137263100_9.
Texto completoWebb, Rick. "Introduction". En Agency, 1–3. New York: Palgrave Macmillan US, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-50122-6_1.
Texto completoWebb, Rick. "Working for Other Agencies". En Agency, 75–85. New York: Palgrave Macmillan US, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-50122-6_10.
Texto completoWebb, Rick. "Pro Bono Work". En Agency, 87–92. New York: Palgrave Macmillan US, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-50122-6_11.
Texto completoWebb, Rick. "The Basics". En Agency, 95–101. New York: Palgrave Macmillan US, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-50122-6_12.
Texto completoWebb, Rick. "The Emotional". En Agency, 103–9. New York: Palgrave Macmillan US, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-50122-6_13.
Texto completoWebb, Rick. "The Pitch". En Agency, 111–34. New York: Palgrave Macmillan US, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-50122-6_14.
Texto completoWebb, Rick. "The Rational". En Agency, 135–54. New York: Palgrave Macmillan US, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-50122-6_15.
Texto completoWebb, Rick. "On Partners and Partnership". En Agency, 157–60. New York: Palgrave Macmillan US, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-50122-6_16.
Texto completoWebb, Rick. "The Team". En Agency, 161–69. New York: Palgrave Macmillan US, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-50122-6_17.
Texto completoActas de conferencias sobre el tema "Agency"
Garcia, Alessandro F., Viviane T. da Silva, Carlos J. P. de Lucena y Ruy L. Milidiú. "An Aspect-Based Approach for Developing Multi-Agent Object-Oriented Systems". En Simpósio Brasileiro de Engenharia de Software. Sociedade Brasileira de Computação, 2001. http://dx.doi.org/10.5753/sbes.2001.23988.
Texto completoVan Lier, Maud. "Understanding Large Language Models through the Lens of Artificial Agency". En 35th Annual Workshop of the Swedish Artificial Intelligence Society SAIS 2023. Linköping University Electronic Press, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.3384/ecp199008.
Texto completoJia, Haiyan, Mu Wu, Eunhwa Jung, Alice Shapiro y S. Shyam Sundar. "Balancing human agency and object agency". En the 2012 ACM Conference. New York, New York, USA: ACM Press, 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2370216.2370470.
Texto completoJahn, Gwyllim, Thomas Morgan y Stanislav Roudavski. "Mesh Agency". En ACADIA 2014: Design Agency. ACADIA, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.52842/conf.acadia.2014.135.
Texto completoBabaioff, Moshe, Michal Feldman y Noam Nisan. "Combinatorial agency". En the 7th ACM conference. New York, New York, USA: ACM Press, 2006. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1134707.1134710.
Texto completoDeVasto, Danielle. "Agency Visualized". En SIGDOC '18: The 36th ACM International Conference on the Design of Communication. New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3233756.3233936.
Texto completoOsawa, Hirotaka y Michita Imai. "Morphing agency". En CHI '13 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. New York, New York, USA: ACM Press, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2468356.2468745.
Texto completoPantic, Igor y Soomeen Hahm. "Isomorphic Agency". En CAADRIA 2015: Emerging Experience in Past, Present and Future of Digital Architecture. CAADRIA, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.52842/conf.caadria.2015.179.
Texto completoPantic, Igor y Soomeen Hahm. "Isomorphic Agency". En CAADRIA 2015: Emerging Experience in Past, Present and Future of Digital Architecture. CAADRIA, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.52842/conf.caadria.2015.179.
Texto completoBallestas, Caseysimone, Euiyoung Kim, Jesuël Lanoy y Jules Janssens. "Design-Engineers’ Selection of Agency: Harm Mitigation in Ambient Intelligent Environments". En ASME 2022 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/detc2022-91063.
Texto completoInformes sobre el tema "Agency"
Speagle, Donald, Shaun Goldfinch y Rory Dufficy. Developing agency capability: a new agency capability review framework. Australia and New Zealand School of Government, mayo de 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.54810/gmku5867.
Texto completoFamily, Jill E. No Agency Adjudication? Center for Migration Studies, diciembre de 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.14240/cmsesy121818.
Texto completoGolosov, Mikhail y Guido Menzio. Agency Business Cycles. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research, noviembre de 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.3386/w21743.
Texto completoMorck, Randall. Generalized Agency Problems. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research, junio de 2009. http://dx.doi.org/10.3386/w15051.
Texto completoWarner, Eugene. NATO Agency Reform. Fort Belvoir, VA: Defense Technical Information Center, abril de 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.21236/ada543730.
Texto completoEngebretsen, Sarah. Data Brief—Agency. Population Council, julio de 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.31899/sbsr2023.1014.
Texto completoPrendergast, Canice. Consumers and Agency Problems. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research, agosto de 2001. http://dx.doi.org/10.3386/w8445.
Texto completoGorton, Gary y Ping He. Agency-Based Asset Pricing. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research, marzo de 2006. http://dx.doi.org/10.3386/w12084.
Texto completoEdlin, Aaron y Benjamin Hermalin. Contract Renegotiation in Agency Problems. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research, julio de 1997. http://dx.doi.org/10.3386/w6086.
Texto completoDEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE WASHINGTON DC. Department of Defense Agency Plan. Fort Belvoir, VA: Defense Technical Information Center, mayo de 2009. http://dx.doi.org/10.21236/ada512950.
Texto completo