Literatura académica sobre el tema "Administrative Decisions Tribunal"
Crea una cita precisa en los estilos APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard y otros
Consulte las listas temáticas de artículos, libros, tesis, actas de conferencias y otras fuentes académicas sobre el tema "Administrative Decisions Tribunal".
Junto a cada fuente en la lista de referencias hay un botón "Agregar a la bibliografía". Pulsa este botón, y generaremos automáticamente la referencia bibliográfica para la obra elegida en el estilo de cita que necesites: APA, MLA, Harvard, Vancouver, Chicago, etc.
También puede descargar el texto completo de la publicación académica en formato pdf y leer en línea su resumen siempre que esté disponible en los metadatos.
Artículos de revistas sobre el tema "Administrative Decisions Tribunal"
Ferreira, Lydia Stewart. "PROCESS MATTERS - EMPIRICALLY EVALUATING ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNALS IN THE HEALTH SECTOR: THE QUESTIONABLE NEUTRALITY OF ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL PROCESS". Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice 32, n.º 1 (1 de febrero de 2015): 217. http://dx.doi.org/10.22329/wyaj.v32i1.4521.
Texto completoHansen, Peter C. "The World Bank Administrative Tribunal’s External Sources of Law: The Next Chapter (2006–2010) (Part II)". Law & Practice of International Courts and Tribunals 11, n.º 3 (2012): 449–97. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/15718034-12341236.
Texto completoLewis, Clive. "The Exhaustion of Alternative Remedies in Administrative Law". Cambridge Law Journal 51, n.º 1 (marzo de 1992): 138–53. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0008197300016792.
Texto completoKilian, Neels. "The Question is "Should Insurers Continuously Update Policyholder Records"? Insurance Law Requires the Principles of Administrative Law to Settle Disputes between the Policyholder and the Insurer". Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal 22 (25 de octubre de 2019): 1–24. http://dx.doi.org/10.17159/1727-3781/2019/v22i0a6386.
Texto completoРешота Reshota, Володимир Volodymyr. "Реформа адміністративної юстиції у Сполученому Королівстві Великої Британії та Північної Ірландії". Copernicus Political and Legal Studies 1, n.º 2 (2022): 24–32. http://dx.doi.org/10.15804/cpls.20222.02.
Texto completoRomli, Fariza y Harlida Abdul Wahab. "Pelaksanaan Sistem Tribunal di Malaysia: Ke Arah Penambahbaikan". Kanun: Jurnal Undang-undang Malaysia 32, n.º 2 (2 de julio de 2020): 223–42. http://dx.doi.org/10.37052/kanun.32(2)no3.
Texto completoMorgan, James. "Securing the Administrative Appeals Tribunal’s independence: Tenure and mechanisms of appointment". Alternative Law Journal 43, n.º 4 (15 de noviembre de 2018): 302–8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1037969x18790046.
Texto completoGarant, Patrice. "Le devoir d'équité procédurale et le contrôle judiciaire ou quasi judiciaire de la procédure administrative". Les Cahiers de droit 23, n.º 3 (12 de abril de 2005): 587–624. http://dx.doi.org/10.7202/042509ar.
Texto completoDuplé, Nicole. "Nouvelles récentes de l'article 96". Les Cahiers de droit 18, n.º 2-3 (12 de abril de 2005): 315–33. http://dx.doi.org/10.7202/042168ar.
Texto completoElliott, Mark y Robert Thomas. "TRIBUNAL JUSTICE AND PROPORTIONATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION". Cambridge Law Journal 71, n.º 2 (15 de junio de 2012): 297–324. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0008197312000505.
Texto completoTesis sobre el tema "Administrative Decisions Tribunal"
Simpson, Rohan D. S. "Got AATitude? A quantitative analysis of refugee decision-making at the Administrative Appeals Tribunal". Thesis, Department of Government and International Relations, 2020. https://hdl.handle.net/2123/21665.
Texto completoFleming, Gabriel Catherine. "Rival goals and values in administrative review: a study of migration decision making". University of Sydney. Law, 2001. http://hdl.handle.net/2123/839.
Texto completoRuiz, Castellanos Maribel. "Vinculatoriedad del precedente judicial en las decisiones de los tribunales administrativos: a propósito de la singular interpretación que realizó el Tribunal Fiscal del criterio vinculante desarrollado en la Casación N° 4392-2013 Lima". Bachelor's thesis, Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú, 2020. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12404/16641.
Texto completoDíaz, Canales Aldo Ricardo Sebastián. "De la decisión del Tribunal de Contratación Pública en orden a negarse a retrotraer procesos licitatorios viciados por ilegalidades y arbitrariedades declaradas". Tesis, Universidad de Chile, 2011. http://www.repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/111871.
Texto completoNo autorizado por el autor para ser publicada a texto completo en portal tesis electrónicas de la Universidad de Chile
La jurisprudencia del Tribunal de Contratación Pública ha sostenido que la sentencia que declara la invalidación de actos u omisiones ilegales o arbitrarias ocurridos en procedimientos administrativos de licitación en que puedan incurrir los organismos públicos regidos por la LBCAS y PS y, que tengan lugar entre la aprobación de las bases de la respectiva licitación y su adjudicación, no deben retrotraerse a su etapa inicial, para con ello no afectar los derechos de terceros que están de buena fe. Lo anterior, fundado en que éste es un límite a la potestad invalidatoria del Estado, reconocido en la doctrina imperante de nuestro medio jurídico. Se argumenta que esta posición es errónea, puesto que prioriza el interés del particular, protegiendo derechos de terceros de buena fe inclusive, nacidos de un acto viciado. Ello, afectaría los principios de certeza y seguridad jurídica basados en el principio de igualdad que tutela nuestro ordenamiento constitucional, los cuales se cumplirían tan sólo con la retroacción a la situación anterior al acto ilegal, restableciendo con ello el imperio del derecho.
Pinto, Edson Antônio Sousa Pontes. "Da vinculação dos tribunais administrativos tributários à sistemática de precedentes do Código de Processo Civil: uma análise fundamentada no princípio constitucional da eficiência". Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo, 2018. https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/21742.
Texto completoMade available in DSpace on 2018-12-13T11:43:28Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Edson Antônio Sousa Pontes Pinto.pdf: 1981621 bytes, checksum: bc7bb8054d74f9d5b4b68138c6510ee1 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2018-11-22
The system of precedents established by the Civil Procedure Code bases on the need for integrity and stability of the legal system, as well as on the imperative guarantee of the uniqueness of the decisions set by the courts that have the competence to standardize the jurisprudence. The objective is to ensure that equal cases are treated in the same way, thus fulfilling the fundamental right of equality laid down in the Federal Constitution. That is, to apply precedents is to exercise the jurisdictional activity guided on the coherence of judgments, based on the arguments already established by the high courts, but above all is to bring rationality to the legal system and to the courts avoiding that these decisions be discarded, ignored or disrespected without any plausible reasoning, or reasons for it. Therefore, all those who have the power to judge, even if in an administrative jurisdiction, should adhere to and respect precedents established by the major courts, since they are bound to them by the constitutional principle of efficiency. This principle mandates that the Public Administration achieve the same purpose with the use of fewer resources, that is, applying this principle in judicial activity, the administrative judge must adhere to established precedents, considered public goods, avoiding that a thesis already judged and pacified is ignored or discarded without its due overruling. The present paper aims to demonstrate that the Tax Administrative Courts must follow precedents, because they are bound by Civil Procedure Code, but, above all, by a duty of efficiency, ordered by such principle, which dictates public agents and obliges them to act with rationality in administrative functions and activities, including here the judicial exercise of such courts
A sistemática de precedentes trazida pelo Código de Processo Civil fundamenta-se na necessidade de integridade e de estabilidade do sistema jurídico, bem como na imperiosa garantia de unicidade dos entendimentos firmados pelos tribunais que têm por competência uniformizar a jurisprudência, garantindo-se, assim, que casos iguais sejam tratados da mesma forma, concretizando, por conseguinte, o direito fundamental de igualdade previsto na Constituição Federal. Ou seja, aplicar precedentes é exercer a atividade jurisdicional pautado na coerência dos julgamentos, baseando-se nas teses já firmadas pelos tribunais de competência superior, mas, sobretudo, é trazer racionalidade ao sistema jurídico e aos órgãos judicantes, evitando-se que esses entendimentos pacificados sejam descartados, ignorados ou desrespeitados sem que haja fundamentação plausível ou motivos determinantes para tanto. Logo, todos aqueles que tem o poder-dever de julgar, mesmo que em sede administrativa, devem se pautar e respeitar os precedentes firmados pelas cortes maiores, visto que se encontram vinculados a eles pelo princípio constitucional da eficiência. Tal princípio ordena que a Administração Pública atinja o mesmo fim com a utilização de menos recursos, ou seja, trazendo à atividade jurisdicional, deve o julgador administrativo, por este princípio, aplicar os precedentes firmados, como bens públicos que são, evitando-se que uma tese já julgada e pacificada seja ignorada ou descartada sem a sua devida superação. O presente trabalho objetiva, portanto, demonstrar que os Tribunais Administrativos Tributários devem seguir precedentes, por estarem vinculados à sistemática do Código de Processo Civil, mas, acima de tudo, por um dever de eficiência, ordenado por tal princípio, que pauta os agentes públicos e os obriga a agir com racionalidade no trato das funções e das atividades administrativas, incluindo-se, aqui, o exercício jurisdicional desses tribunais
Kardimis, Théofanis. "La chambre criminelle de la Cour de cassation face à l’article 6 de la Convention européenne des droits de l’homme : étude juridictionnelle comparée (France-Grèce)". Thesis, Lyon, 2017. http://www.theses.fr/2017LYSE3004.
Texto completoThe first party of the study is dedicated to the invocation of the right to a fair trial intra and extra muros and, on this basis, it focuses on the direct applicability of Article 6 and the subsidiarity of the Convention and of the European Court of Human Rights. Because of the fact that the right to a fair trial is a ‘‘judge-made law’’, the study also focuses on the invocability of the judgments of the European Court and more precisely on the direct invocability of the European Court’s judgment finding that there has been a violation of the Convention and on the request for an interpretation in accordance with the European Court’s decisions. The possibility of reviewing the criminal judgment made in violation of the Convention has generated a new right of access to the Court of cassation which particularly concerns the violations of the right to a fair trial and is probably the most important step for the respect of the right to a fair trial after enabling the right of individual petition. As for the weak conventional basis of the authority of res interpretata (“autorité de la chose interprétée”), this fact explains why an indirect dialogue between the ECHR and the Court of cassation is possible but doesn’t affect the applicant’s right to request an interpretation in accordance with the Court’s decisions and the duty of the Court of cassation to explain why it has decided to depart from the (non-binding) precedent.The second party of the study is bigger than the first one and is dedicated to the guarantees of the proper administration of justice (Article 6§1), the presumption of innocence (Article 6§2), the rights which find their conventional basis on the Article 6§1 but their logical explanation to the presumption of innocence and the rights of defence (Article 6§3). More precisely, the second party of the study is analyzing the right to an independent and impartial tribunal established by law, the right to a hearing within a reasonable time, the principle of equality of arms, the right to adversarial proceedings, the right of the defence to the last word, the right to a public hearing and a public pronouncement of the judgement, the judge’s duty to state the reasons for his decision, the presumption of innocence, in both its procedural and personal dimensions, the accused’s right to lie, his right to remain silent, his right against self-incrimination, his right to be informed of the nature and the cause of the accusation and the potential re-characterisation of the facts, his right to have adequate time and facilities for the preparation of the defence, including in particular the access to the case-file and the free and confidential communication with his lawyer, his right to appear in person at the trial, his right to defend either in person or through legal assistance, his right to be represented by his counsel, his right to free legal aid if he hasn’t sufficient means to pay for legal assistance but the interests of justice so require, his right to examine or have examined witnesses against him and to obtain the attendance and examination of witnesses on his behalf under the same conditions as witnesses against him and his right to the free assistance of an interpreter and to the translation of the key documents. The analysis is based on the decisions of the European Court of Human Rights and focuses on the position taken by the French and the Greek Court of Cassation (Areopagus) on each one of the above mentioned rights
Santos, Henrique Guilherme Amaral. "Procedimentos de licitações públicas: Análise das irregularidades mais frequentes e classificação do grau de risco de desvirtuação da qualidade da licitação". Master's thesis, 2010. http://hdl.handle.net/10071/3869.
Texto completoThis dissertation studies the brazilian Public Administration under the prism of the licitatory processes. Public licitations supply a rich environment of situations for the study of the administration in the Public Sector, once they comprise not only the protocols to the aquisition of goods and services or the contraction of constructions, but the payment and financial activities and management of those processes as well. The Tribunal de Contas da União is the organization responsable for the external control in Brazil. It contemplates and judges the accounts of the various public entities and publishes its decisions on its eletronic address: www.tcu.org.br. These decisions, called “acórdãos”, contain the identified irregularities and the position of the ministers, justifying the condemnation or acquittal of the responsables. We used delimiting parameters to create a sample with which we could work and investigate which public licitation related irregularities occur more often. Therefore, we could list the most common infractions and create quantitative information related to the management of the brazilian public entities, mainly in what refers to the public licitations and related activities (payment process and covenant). That allowed us to formulate sugestions and get to especific conclusions, trying to improve the processes relevant to Public Administration.
Bayrak, Sule. "Contextualizing discretion : micro-dynamics of Canada’s refugee determination system". Thèse, 2015. http://hdl.handle.net/1866/13580.
Texto completoIn an era where international immigration is increasingly difficult and selective, refugee status constitutes a valuable public good that enables some non-citizens access and membership to the host country. Based on the discretionary judgment of the decision-maker, refugee status is only granted to claimants who establish well-founded fear of persecution if returned to their home country. Canada’s largest independent administrative tribunal, Immigration and Refugee Board of Canada (IRB), is charged to hear refugee claimants and make refugee status determinations. This dissertation investigates why significant disparities exist among IRB’s politically appointed decision-makers’ refugee status grant rates. As little was known about the concrete ways Canada allocates opportunities for entry and legal status for non-citizens, lifting the blanket of administration was necessary. By exploring refugee decision-making from a Street Level Bureaucracy Theory (SLBT) perspective, and an ethnographic methodology that combined direct observation, semi-structured interviews and document analysis, the study sought first to understand whether the variation in grant rates were a result of differences in decision-makers’ discretionary practices and reasoning and second to trace the organizational factors that foster variation. In line with previous scholarship on SLBT that document how the work situation structure discretion and how individual views play in decision-making; this study demonstrates substantive differences among decision-makers in terms of their work routines, conceptions of refugee claimants and the best way to conduct their work. The analysis illustrates how decision-makers apply not a singular but a variety of approaches to the refugee hearing, ranging from rigid interrogation to the more resilient interview style. Despite clear organizational constraints on decision-makers that target to increase consistency and efficiency of refugee determinations, the significance of credibility-assessment and the invisibility of the decision-making space leave ample room for discretionary behavior. Even in rule-saturated environments like administrative tribunals which extensively regulate discretion; decision-making hardly means neutral and hierarchical rule adherence. Instead discretion is nested within the context of interaction routines, work situation, rule adherence and law. It is inherently difficult if not improbable to control and discipline discretionary decision-making even in organizations that institutionalize and standardize training and communicate their demands clearly to decision-makers. When faced with goal ambiguity and with demands that they consider run against their discretionary authority, decision-makers reinterpret their job definition and routinize their practices. They formulate an encounter routine that is organizationally acceptable to assess the people in front of them. This dissertation illustrates how unevenly the claimants, their testimony and evidence are treated and how these treatments are reflected on the refugee decision.
Zwierz, Marta. "Zakaz ne bis in idem w prawie administracyjnym". Doctoral thesis, 2020. https://depotuw.ceon.pl/handle/item/3660.
Texto completoThe subject of the doctoral dissertation is the prohibition of ne bis in idem in adminis-trative law. The author assumes that the prohibition of ne bis in idem no longer concerns only criminal law standards, but that it is a system-wide directive which is, in some sense, also rele-vant from the point of view of the rules of administrative law. The doctoral disservice itself consists of five chapters preceded by preliminary observations and completed proposals. The author applies a formal-dogmatic test method. The first chapter examines the various aspects of the prohibition of ne bis in idem in criminal law. The author also proves that the prohibition of ne bis in idem from the criminal law regime has been liberated by the rules of international law. The second chapter draws attention to the specific design of the prohibition of ne bis in idem as a constitutional principle. In this regard, the author seeks to determine whether it is binding on the legislator and the authorities applying the law. It is also important for the au-thor to determine whether the prohibition of ne bis in idem forms part of the public subjective rights, or remains merely a legitimate expectation of citizens. The author draws attention to the clear breakdown of the legal matter in the area of application of the ne bis in idem prohibition at constitutional level into two spheres: punishment and sanctioning. The starting point for the considerations in the third chapter is that the case-law of the Constitutional Tribunal affects the scope of the ne bis in idem prohibition in administrative law. The author therefore undertakes to determine by which types of administrative sanctions citizens can claim legal protection. In the fourth chapter, it draws attention to the fact that, in the area of substantive law, the prohibition of ne bis in idem is limited to some of the many possible options of overlap-ping of legal sanctions. The author guards the conviction that the scope of the prohibition of ne bis in idem is justified in the axiology of administrative law. It therefore points to the bor-der set by the legislator between the typical measures of the administrative police and the means of administrative coerction and the legal sanctions of depriving or restricting certain categories of allowances. It also considers its compatibility in the light of the public interest clause and the constitutional requirement of proportionality of the legal response to breach of legal obligation. The fifth chapter concerns the procedural aspect of the prohibition of ne bis in idem in administrative law. The author assumes that in this regard it is closely linked to the procedural premise of res iudicata. It seeks, therefore, to demonstrate that it is relevant not only at the stage of the judicial procedure, but that it materialates the idea pursued by the prohibition of ne bis in idem by means of a general administrative procedure. In this chapter, the author seeks to further answer the question of whether the institution of preliminary issues and provi-sional decisions are of significant importance from the point of view of the prohibition of ne bis in idem.
Libros sobre el tema "Administrative Decisions Tribunal"
Amerasinghe, Chittharanjan Felix. Index of decisions of international administrative tribunals: Including League of Nations Administrative Tribunal ... 2a ed. [Washington, D.C.]: World Bank Administrative Tribunal, Office of the Executive Secretary, 1985.
Buscar texto completo(Australia), Administrative Review Council. Environmental decisions and the Administrative Appeals Tribunal: Report to the Minister for Justice. Canberra: Australian Govt. Pub. Service, 1994.
Buscar texto completoAmerasinghe, C. F. Index of decisions of international administrative tribunals. 3a ed. [Washington, D.C.]: World Bank Administrative Tribunal, Office of the Executive Secretary, 1991.
Buscar texto completo1933-, Amerasinghe Chittharanjan Felix y World Bank. Administrative Tribunal. Office of the Executive Secretary., eds. Index of decisions of international administrative tribunals. 3a ed. [Washington, D.C.]: World Bank Administrative Tribunal, Office of the Executive Secretary, 1991.
Buscar texto completoVillaggi, Jean-Pierre. L'administration publique québécoise et le processus décisionnel: Des pouvoirs au contrôle administratif et judiciaire. Cowansville, Québec: Éditions Y. Blais, 2005.
Buscar texto completoInfanzón, Jelio Paredes. La predictibilidad jurídica y el precedente: Precedentes vinculantes : constitucional judicial, administrativo : stare decisis, certiorari. Lima, Perú: San Marcos, 2008.
Buscar texto completoSerrano, Santiago Basabe. Jueces sin toga: Políticas judiciales y toma de decisiones en el Tribunal Constitucional del Ecuador (1999-2007). Quito: FLACSO Sede Ecuador, 2011.
Buscar texto completoAsociación por los Derechos Civiles (Buenos Aires, Argentina), ed. La corte y los derechos, 2005-2007: Cómo impactan en la vida de los ciudadanos, las decisiones del máximo tribunal. Buenos Aires: Siglo Veintiuno Editores Argentina, 2008.
Buscar texto completoHer Majesty's Courts and Tribunals Service. Administrative Appeals Chamber Reports 2012 : (including Decisions of the Administrative Appeals Chamber of the Upper Tribunal, and of Courts and Tribunals Dealing with Related Matters). Stationery Office, The, 2013.
Buscar texto completoGreat Britain: H.M. Courts & Tribunals Service. Administrative Appeals Chamber Reports 2013 : (including Decisions of the Administrative Appeals Chamber of the Upper Tribunal, and of Courts and Tribunals Dealing with Related Matters). Stationery Office, The, 2014.
Buscar texto completoCapítulos de libros sobre el tema "Administrative Decisions Tribunal"
Mantzari, Despoina. "Judicial Scrutiny of Regulatory Decisions at the UK’s Specialist Competition Appeal Tribunal". En Judicial Review of Administrative Discretion in the Administrative State, 63–80. The Hague: T.M.C. Asser Press, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6265-307-8_4.
Texto completoHannam, Ian. "Legislative Protection for the Soil Environment and Climate Change". En International Yearbook of Soil Law and Policy 2022, 51–82. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2024. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-40609-6_3.
Texto completoElliott, Mark y Jason Varuhas. "18. Statutory Tribunals". En Administrative Law. Oxford University Press, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198719465.003.0018.
Texto completoParpworth, Neil. "16. Tribunals, inquiries, and the ombudsmen remedy". En Constitutional and Administrative Law, 369–404. Oxford University Press, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198847120.003.0016.
Texto completoParpworth, Neil. "16. Tribunals, inquiries, and the ombudsmen remedy". En Constitutional and Administrative Law, 376–412. Oxford University Press, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/he/9780192856579.003.0016.
Texto completoAmerasinghe, C. F. "Taxation". En Case-Law of the World Bank AdMinisirative Tribunal, 141–43. Oxford University PressOxford, 1993. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198258193.003.0026.
Texto completoClayton, Gina, Georgina Firth, Caroline Sawyer, Rowena Moffatt y Helena Wray. "7. Challenging decisions: appeals, administrative and judicial review". En Immigration & Asylum Law. Oxford University Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198815211.003.0007.
Texto completoClayton, Gina, Georgina Firth, Caroline Sawyer y Rowena Moffatt. "7. Challenging decisions: appeals, administrative and judicial review". En Immigration & Asylum Law, 247–76. Oxford University Press, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198848936.003.0007.
Texto completoDivan, Shyam y Armin Rosencranz. "National Green Tribunal". En Environmental Law and Policy in India, 110—C5.N97. 3a ed. Oxford University PressOxford, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192865458.003.0005.
Texto completoAmerasinghe, C. F. "Prejudice/Discrimination". En Case-Law of the World Bank Administrative Tribunal, 66–70. Oxford University PressOxford, 1997. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198265764.003.0009.
Texto completo