Academic literature on the topic 'Why-Not questions'
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Why-Not questions.'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Journal articles on the topic "Why-Not questions"
Friedman, Susan Stanford. "Why Not Compare?" PMLA/Publications of the Modern Language Association of America 126, no. 3 (May 2011): 753–62. http://dx.doi.org/10.1632/pmla.2011.126.3.753.
Full textMaltsev, Oleg. "Why Fate is Not Popular." Newsletter on the Results of Scholarly Work in Sociology, Criminology, Philosophy and Political Science 3, no. 1 (January 7, 2022): 8–23. http://dx.doi.org/10.61439/uake7898.
Full textOrlandi, Nico. "Why Not Reductionism?" Journal of Consciousness Studies 29, no. 7 (July 14, 2022): 218–25. http://dx.doi.org/10.53765/20512201.29.7.218.
Full textZhong, Zhefan, Xin Lin, Liang He, and Jing Yang. "Answering why-not questions on KNN queries." Frontiers of Computer Science 13, no. 5 (June 17, 2019): 1062–71. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11704-018-7074-4.
Full textWang, Meng, Jun Liu, Bifan Wei, Siyu Yao, Hongwei Zeng, and Lei Shi. "Answering why-not questions on SPARQL queries." Knowledge and Information Systems 58, no. 1 (January 19, 2018): 169–208. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10115-018-1155-4.
Full textLiu, Qing, Yunjun Gao, Gang Chen, Baihua Zheng, and Linlin Zhou. "Answering why-not and why questions on reverse top-k queries." VLDB Journal 25, no. 6 (September 3, 2016): 867–92. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00778-016-0443-4.
Full textZhian He and Eric Lo. "Answering Why-Not Questions on Top-K Queries." IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering 26, no. 6 (June 2014): 1300–1315. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/tkde.2012.158.
Full textWang, Meng, Weitong Chen, Sen Wang, Jun Liu, Xue Li, and Bela Stantic. "Answering why-not questions on semantic multimedia queries." Multimedia Tools and Applications 77, no. 3 (September 2, 2017): 3405–29. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11042-017-5151-6.
Full textŁukaszyk, Ewa. "Why Minor, Not Major?" Colloquia Humanistica, no. 2 (June 13, 2015): 13–16. http://dx.doi.org/10.11649/ch.2013.015.
Full textKo, Andrew J., and Brad A. Myers. "Extracting and answering why and why not questions about Java program output." ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology 20, no. 2 (August 2010): 1–36. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1824760.1824761.
Full textDissertations / Theses on the topic "Why-Not questions"
Chen, Lei. "Answering why-not questions on spatial keyword top-k queries /Chen Lei." HKBU Institutional Repository, 2016. https://repository.hkbu.edu.hk/etd_oa/365.
Full textAttolou, Hervé-Madelein. "Explications pour des recommandations manquantes basées sur les graphes." Electronic Thesis or Diss., CY Cergy Paris Université, 2024. http://www.theses.fr/2024CYUN1337.
Full textIn the era of big data, Recommendation Systems play a pivotal role in helping users navigate and discover relevant content from vast amounts of data. Whilemodern Recommendation Systems have evolved to provide accurate and relevant recommendations, they often fall short in explaining their decisions to users. Thislack of transparency raises important questions about trust and user engagement, especially in cases where certain expected items are not recommended. To addressthis, recent research has focused on developing explainable Recommendation Systems, which provide users with insights into why certain items are recommended oromitted.This thesis explores the specific area of Why-Not Explanations, which focuses on explaining why certain items are missing from the recommendation list. Theneed for Why-Not Explanations is particularly crucial in complex recommendation scenarios, where the absence of certain recommendations can lead to user dissatisfaction or mistrust. For instance, a user on an e-commerce platform might wonder why a specific product was not recommended despite fulfilling certain criteria. By providing explanations for missing recommendations, we aim to improve transparency, user satisfaction, engagement, and the overall trustworthiness of the system.The main contribution of this thesis is the development of EMiGRe (Explainable Missing Graph REcommender), a novel framework that provides actionable Why-Not Explanations for graph-based Recommendation Systems. Unlike traditional explainability methods, which focus on justifying why certain items were recommended, EMiGRe focuses on the absence of specific items from recommendation lists. The framework operates by analyzing the user's interactions within a Heterogeneous Information Graph (HIN) modelization of a dataset, identifying key actions or relations that, when modified, would have led to the recommendation of the missing item. EMiGRe provides two modes for explanation:• Remove Mode identifies existing actions or interactions that are preventing the system from recommending the desired item and suggests removing these.• Add Mode suggests additional actions or items that, if interacted with, would trigger the recommendation of the missing item.To generate explanations in both Add and Remove modes, we explore the solution space using a set of heuristics tailored for specific objectives. The framework offers multiple heuristics each serving a purpose: Incremental Powerset an Exhaustive Comparison . The Incremental heuristic prioritizes faster computation by gradually increasing the set of selected items, potentially overlooking minimal explanations. In contrast, the Powerset heuristic aims to find smaller explanations by thoroughly searching the solution space. Additionally, Exhaustive Comparison comparison heuristic is included to assess the precise contribution of each neighbor to the Why-Not Item (W NI) compared to all other items, increasing the success rate.To validate the effectiveness of the EMiGRe framework, extensive experimental evaluations were conducted on both synthetic and real-world datasets. The datasets include datasets from sources like Amazon, which simulates a real-world e-commerce scenario, and the Food dataset representing a recommendation problemin a recipe-based platform. The experimental results show that EMiGRe is able to provide good-quality Why-Not Explanations. Specifically, the system demonstratesan improvement in explanation success rates compared to traditional brute-force methods, while maintaining acceptable explanation size and processing time.Moreover, this thesis introduces a novel evaluation for Why-Not Explanations, defining metrics such as success rate, explanation size, and processing time to measure the quality and efficiency of explanations
Tzompanaki, Aikaterini. "Réponses manquantes : Débogage et Réparation de requêtes." Thesis, Université Paris-Saclay (ComUE), 2015. http://www.theses.fr/2015SACLS223/document.
Full textWith the increasing amount of available data and data transformations, typically specified by queries, the need to understand them also increases. “Why are there medicine books in my sales report?” or “Why are there not any database books?” For the first question we need to find the origins or provenance of the result tuples in the source data. However, reasoning about missing query results, specified by Why-Not questions as the latter previously mentioned, has not till recently receivedthe attention it is worth of. Why-Not questions can be answered by providing explanations for the missing tuples. These explanations identify why and how data pertinent to the missing tuples were not properly combined by the query. Essentially, the causes lie either in the input data (e.g., erroneous or incomplete data) or at the query level (e.g., a query operator like join). Assuming that the source data contain all the necessary relevant information, we can identify the responsible query operators formingquery-based explanations. This information can then be used to propose query refinements modifying the responsible operators of the initial query such that the refined query result contains the expected data. This thesis proposes a framework targeted towards SQL query debugging and fixing to recover missing query results based on query-based explanations and query refinements.Our contribution to query debugging consist in two different approaches. The first one is a tree-based approach. First, we provide the formal framework around Why-Not questions, missing from the state-of-the-art. Then, we review in detail the state-of-the-art, showing how it probably leads to inaccurate explanations or fails to provide an explanation. We further propose the NedExplain algorithm that computes correct explanations for SPJA queries and unions there of, thus considering more operators (aggregation) than the state of the art. Finally, we experimentally show that NedExplain is better than the both in terms of time performance and explanation quality. However, we show that the previous approach leads to explanations that differ for equivalent query trees, thus providing incomplete information about what is wrong with the query. We address this issue by introducing a more general notion of explanations, using polynomials. The polynomial captures all the combinations in which the query conditions should be fixed in order for the missing tuples to appear in the result. This method is targeted towards conjunctive queries with inequalities. We further propose two algorithms, Ted that naively interprets the definitions for polynomial explanations and the optimized Ted++. We show that Ted does not scale well w.r.t. the size of the database. On the other hand, Ted++ is capable ii of efficiently computing the polynomial, relying on schema and data partitioning and advantageous replacement of expensive database evaluations by mathematical calculations. Finally, we experimentally evaluate the quality of the polynomial explanations and the efficiency of Ted++, including a comparative evaluation.For query fixing we propose is a new approach for refining a query by leveraging polynomial explanations. Based on the input data we propose how to change the query conditions pinpointed by the explanations by adjusting the constant values of the selection conditions. In case of joins, we introduce a novel type of query refinements using outer joins. We further devise the techniques to compute query refinements in the FixTed algorithm, and discuss how our method has the potential to be more efficient and effective than the related work.Finally, we have implemented both Ted++ and FixTed in an system prototype. The query debugging and fixing platform, short EFQ allows users to nteractively debug and fix their queries when having Why- Not questions
"Diagnosing dizziness in the emergency department: Why "What do you mean by 'dizzy'?" Should not be the first question you ask." THE JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY, 2007. http://pqdtopen.proquest.com/#viewpdf?dispub=3267879.
Full textBooks on the topic "Why-Not questions"
Willke, J. C. Why not love them both?: Questions & answers about abortion. [Cincinnati, Ohio: Hayes Pub. Co., 1997.
Find full textCobb, Vicki. Why can't I live forever?: And other not such dumb questions about life. New York: Lodestar Books, 1997.
Find full textCobb, Vicki. Why doesn't the sun burn out?: And other not such dumb questions about energy. New York: Lodestar Books, 1990.
Find full textill, Enik Ted, ed. Why can't you unscramble an egg?: And other not such dumb questions about matter. New York: Lodestar Books, 1990.
Find full textill, Enik Ted, ed. Why doesn't the earth fall up?: And other not such dumb questions about motion. New York: Lodestar Books, 1988.
Find full textPakistan Institute of Legislative Development and Transparency., ed. Why some people vote and others do not?: Penetrating answers to this and other key questions which intrigue election observers. Lahore: Pakistan Institute of Legislative Development and Transparency, 2003.
Find full textMooney, Bel. Why not? Methuen Children's, 1990.
Find full textWhy does not God intervene? and other questions. 2nd ed. New York: Hodder and Stoughton, 1990.
Find full textKea, ElElise. Why Not Me?: Sometimes, We Ask the Wrong Questions. Outskirts Press, Incorporated, 2016.
Find full textHayes, Declan. God's Solution: Why Religion not Science Answers Life's Deepest Questions. iUniverse, Inc., 2007.
Find full textBook chapters on the topic "Why-Not questions"
Faye, Jan. "Not Just Why-questions." In The Nature of Scientific Thinking, 210–40. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9781137389831_9.
Full textShagoury, Ruth, and Brenda Miller Power. "Epilogue Why Not Teacher Research?" In Living the Questions, 235–39. 2nd ed. New York: Routledge, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781032681528-9.
Full textZong, Chuanyu, Bin Wang, Jing Sun, and Xiaochun Yang. "Minimizing Explanations of Why-Not Questions." In Database Systems for Advanced Applications, 230–42. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-43984-5_17.
Full textLi, Yin, and Bixin Li. "Answering Why-Not Questions on GeoSPARQL Queries." In Web and Big Data, 286–300. Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-25198-6_22.
Full textGao, Yunjun, and Qing Liu. "Why-Not and Why Questions on Reverse Top-k Queries." In Preference Query Analysis and Optimization, 31–74. Singapore: Springer Singapore, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-6635-1_3.
Full textZong, Chuanyu, Xiufeng Xia, Bin Wang, Xiaochun Yang, Jiajia Li, Xiangyu Liu, and Rui Zhu. "Answering Why-Not Questions on Structural Graph Clustering." In Database Systems for Advanced Applications, 255–71. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91452-7_17.
Full textStratigi, Maria, Katerina Tzompanaki, and Kostas Stefanidis. "Why-Not Questions & Explanations for Collaborative Filtering." In Web Information Systems Engineering – WISE 2020, 301–15. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-62008-0_21.
Full textLi, Guozhong, Nathan Ng, Peipei Yi, Zhiwei Zhang, and Byron Choi. "Answering the Why-Not Questions of Graph Query Autocompletion." In Database Systems for Advanced Applications, 332–41. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91452-7_22.
Full textZong, Chuanyu, Zefang Dong, Xiaochun Yang, Bin Wang, Tao Qiu, and Huaijie Zhu. "Efficiently Answering Why-Not Questions on Radius-Bounded k-Core Searches." In Database Systems for Advanced Applications, 93–109. Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-30675-4_7.
Full textZhang, Wang, Yanhong Li, Lihchyun Shu, Changyin Luo, and Jianjun Li. "Shadow: Answering Why-Not Questions on Top-K Spatial Keyword Queries over Moving Objects." In Database Systems for Advanced Applications, 738–60. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-73197-7_51.
Full textConference papers on the topic "Why-Not questions"
Braman, Gary. "Aircraft Accidents: Investigating Human Error." In Vertical Flight Society 73rd Annual Forum & Technology Display, 1–5. The Vertical Flight Society, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.4050/f-0073-2017-12157.
Full textRusovac, Dominik, Markus Hecher, Martin Gebser, Sarah Alice Gaggl, and Johannes K. Fichte. "Navigating and Querying Answer Sets: How Hard Is It Really and Why?" In 21st International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning {KR-2023}, 642–53. California: International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence Organization, 2024. http://dx.doi.org/10.24963/kr.2024/60.
Full textTran, Quoc Trung, and Chee-Yong Chan. "How to ConQueR why-not questions." In the 2010 international conference. New York, New York, USA: ACM Press, 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1807167.1807172.
Full textIslam, M. S. "On answering why and why-not questions in databases." In 2013 IEEE 29th International Conference on Data Engineering Workshops (ICDEW 2013). IEEE, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/icdew.2013.6547468.
Full textMyers, Brad A., David A. Weitzman, Andrew J. Ko, and Duen H. Chau. "Answering why and why not questions in user interfaces." In the SIGCHI conference. New York, New York, USA: ACM Press, 2006. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1124772.1124832.
Full textHe, Zhian, and Eric Lo. "Answering Why-not Questions on Top-k Queries." In 2012 IEEE International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE 2012). IEEE, 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/icde.2012.8.
Full textIslam, M. S., Rui Zhou, and Chengfei Liu. "On answering why-not questions in reverse skyline queries." In 2013 29th IEEE International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE 2013). IEEE, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/icde.2013.6544890.
Full textChen, Lu, Yunjun Gao, Kai Wang, Christian S. Jensen, and Gang Chen. "Answering why-not questions on metric probabilistic range queries." In 2016 IEEE 32nd International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE). IEEE, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/icde.2016.7498288.
Full textBidoit, Nicole, Melanie Herschel, and Aikaterini Tzompanaki. "Efficient Computation of Polynomial Explanations of Why-Not Questions." In CIKM'15: 24th ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management. New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2806416.2806426.
Full textVermeulen, Jo, Geert Vanderhulst, Kris Luyten, and Karin Coninx. "PervasiveCrystal: Asking and Answering Why and Why Not Questions about Pervasive Computing Applications." In 2010 6th International Conference on Intelligent Environments (IE). IEEE, 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ie.2010.56.
Full textReports on the topic "Why-Not questions"
Jordà, Òscar, Martin Kornejew, Moritz Schularick, and Alan Taylor. Zombies at Large? Corporate Debt Overhang and the Macroeconomy. Institute for New Economic Thinking Working Paper Series, October 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.36687/inetwp168.
Full textWebb, Philip. Deployment of Parallel Kinematic Machines in Manufacturing. SAE International, April 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.4271/epr2022010.
Full textAndrews, Matt. Getting Real about Unknowns in Complex Policy Work. Research on Improving Systems of Education (RISE), November 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.35489/bsg-rise-wp_2021/083.
Full textMagnoli, Alessandro. National Health Accounts in Latin America and Caribbean: Concept, Results and Policy Uses. Inter-American Development Bank, September 2001. http://dx.doi.org/10.18235/0012213.
Full textAntonov, Volodymyr. Natural history BBC documentaries: history and functions. Ivan Franko National University of Lviv, February 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.30970/vjo.2022.51.11402.
Full textPinheiro, Armando Castelar, Indermit S. Gill, Luis Servén, and Mark Roland Thomas. Brazilian Economic Growth, 1900-2000: Lessons and Policy Implications. Inter-American Development Bank, May 2004. http://dx.doi.org/10.18235/0008731.
Full textBlaxter, Tamsin, Elina Åsbjer, and Walter Fraanje. Animal welfare and ethics in food and agriculture. TABLE, August 2024. http://dx.doi.org/10.56661/f2d8f4c7.
Full textBelafi, Carmen. Where There’s a Will There’s a Way: The Role of Political Will in Creating/Producing/Shaping Education Systems for Learning. Research on Improving Systems of Education (RISE), July 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.35489/bsg-rise-ri_2022/043.
Full textBrophy, Kenny, and Alison Sheridan, eds. Neolithic Scotland: ScARF Panel Report. Society of Antiquaries of Scotland, June 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.9750/scarf.06.2012.196.
Full textGlick, Mark, Gabriel A. Lozada, and Darren Bush. Why Economists Should Support Populist Antitrust Goals. Institute for New Economic Thinking Working Paper Series, December 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.36687/inetwp195.
Full text