Log in

Relevant bibliographies by topics / Water Relations / Journal articles

To see the other types of publications on this topic, follow the link: Water Relations.

Journal articles on the topic 'Water Relations'

Author: Grafiati

Published: 4 June 2021

Last updated: 10 March 2023

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Consult the top 50 journal articles for your research on the topic 'Water Relations.'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Browse journal articles on a wide variety of disciplines and organise your bibliography correctly.

1

White, R. H., M. C. Engelke, S. J. Anderson, B. A. Ruemmele, K. B. Marcum, and G. R. Taylor. "Zoysiagrass Water Relations." Crop Science 41, no. 1 (January 2001): 133–38. http://dx.doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2001.411133x.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

2

Kriedemann, P. E. "TREE WATER RELATIONS." Acta Horticulturae, no. 175 (March 1986): 343–50. http://dx.doi.org/10.17660/actahortic.1986.175.51.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

3

Chafe, S. C. "Wood-water relations." Forest Ecology and Management 31, no. 1-2 (February 1990): 121–23. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0378-1127(90)90117-t.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

4

Quarrels, Jesse R., and Paul G. Thompson. "WATER RELATIONS IN SWEETPOTATO." HortScience 26, no. 5 (May 1991): 489g—489. http://dx.doi.org/10.21273/hortsci.26.5.489g.

Full text

Abstract:

An experiment was conducted to determine the rate and frequency of irrigation needed for optimum yield in sweetpotato (Ipomoea batatas (L.)Lam). A line source irrigation system was used to provide continuously increasing amounts of water at each irrigation. The physiological responses of sweetpotato to water application were measured. There was an increase in leaf water potential with increasing rates of irrigation. Leaf diffusive resistance decreased as total water rate increased to 76% of pan evaporation (Epan) and then increased with higher rates of irrigation. Marketable yields increased as total water rate increased to 76% of Epan and then decreased rapidly with higher irrigation rates. Water relations measurements indicated that reduction in yield with higher amounts of water application was due to low soil oxygen content.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

5

BERKOWITZ, GERALD A. "Water Relations of Plants." Soil Science 140, no. 4 (October 1985): 305. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00010694-198510000-00013.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

6

Kramer, Paul J. "Water Relations of Plants." Journal of Range Management 38, no. 5 (September 1985): 480. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3899732.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

7

Linnenbrink, Martina, Rainer Lösch, and Ludger Kappen. "Water Relations of Hedgerow Shrubs in Northern Central EuropeI. Bulk Water Relations." Flora 187 (1992): 121–33. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0367-2530(17)32211-9.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

8

Petrie, CL, and AE Hall. "Water Relations in Cowpea and Pearl Millet Under Soil Water Deficits. I. Contrasting Leaf Water Relations." Functional Plant Biology 19, no. 6 (1992): 577. http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/pp9920577.

Full text

Abstract:

Cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.] can survive soil water deficits more effectively than pearl millet [Pennisetum americanum (L.) Leeke]. Cowpea and millet were grown in a glasshouse in different rooting media and different sizes of container, under wet and dry treatments, and as sole crops and intercrops to evaluate any differences in leaf water potential. Millet developed significantly lower predawn leaf water potentials (ΨL) than cowpea under the dry treatment of all of the rooting media and container sizes used, but both millet and cowpea maintained high predawn ΨL in the well-watered treatment. With the dry treatment, the same difference in predawn ΨL between cowpea and millet developed in plants grown either as sole crops or as intercrops in the same pot. These results suggest that plants grown as intercrops were somehow isolated from each other, even though their root systems may have overlapped, and that competition for water was probably not occurring. Differences in predawn ΨL between cowpea and millet were detected with either a pressure chamber or psychrometers, but values of ΨL varied with measurement method. Compared with psychrometer values, pressure chamber values became significantly lower in millet late in the dry treatment but were higher in cowpea. Agreement between the methods for measuring ΨL improved in cowpea when predawn xylem osmotic potential was added to the pressure chamber value. At the end of the experiments, leaf surface conductance to water vapour and leaf area were lower in millet than cowpea. Consequently, it is possible that the significantly lower predawn ΨL in millet was not due to greater water use by millet compared with cowpea.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

9

Lobato, A. K. S., R. C. L. Costa, C. F. Oliveira Neto, B. G. Santos Filho, M. C. Gonçalves-Vidigal, P. S. Vidigal Filho, C. R. Silva, et al. "Consequences of the water deficit on water relations and symbiosis in Vigna unguiculata cultivars." Plant, Soil and Environment 55, No. 4 (May 5, 2009): 139–45. http://dx.doi.org/10.17221/1615-pse.

Full text

Abstract:

The study aimed at evaluating and comparing changes provoked by the water deficit on water relations and nitrogen fixation in two <I>Vigna unguiculata</I> cultivars, as well as at indicating which cultivar is more tolerant under water deficiency. The experimental design used was entirely randomized in factorial scheme, with 2 cultivars (Pitiuba and Pérola) and 2 water regimes (control and stress). The parameters evaluated were the leaf relative water content, stomatal conductance, transpiration rate, nodule number, nodule dry matter, nitrate reductase enzyme activity, ureide concentration and leghemoglobin in nodule. The stomatal conductance of the Pitiuba and Pérola cultivars under water deficit were 0.20 and 0.01 mmol H<sub>2</sub>O/m<sup>2</sup>/s, respectively. The nitrate reductase activity of the plants under stress was significantly reduced in both cultivars. The leghemoglobin in the Pitiuba and Pérola cultivars under water stress had the concentrations of 58 and 41 g/kg dry matter, respectively. The parameters investigated in this study suggest that the Pitiuba cultivar under water deficit suffers from smaller changes, when compared with Pérola cultivar.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

10

Ismail, M. R., and W. J. Davies. "Water relations of Capsicum genotypes under water stress." Biologia plantarum 39, no. 2 (September 1, 1997): 293–97. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/a:1000684016914.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

11

Villela, F. A. "Water relations in seed biology." Scientia Agricola 55, spe (1998): 98–101. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/s0103-90161998000500018.

Full text

Abstract:

The water relations play a fundamental role in seed biology. Thus, the purpose of the present paper was to analyze the performance of water status in seed development and germination. The researches have suggested that the water potential of the seed or seed structures provides a better indicator of the seed water status than water content. The seed water status plays a regulatory role in seed development and germination.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

12

Taylor, G., and W. J. Davies. "WATER RELATIONS AND LEAF GROWTH." Acta Horticulturae, no. 171 (July 1985): 131–38. http://dx.doi.org/10.17660/actahortic.1985.171.11.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

13

Lehto, Tarja. "Mycorrhiza and plant water relations." Karstenia 28, no. 1 (1988): 26. http://dx.doi.org/10.29203/ka.1988.257.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

14

Gates, D. M. "Water relations of forest trees." IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 29, no. 6 (November 1991): 836. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/tgrs.1991.1019467.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

15

Lillywhite, H. B. "Water relations of tetrapod integument." Journal of Experimental Biology 209, no. 2 (January 15, 2006): 202–26. http://dx.doi.org/10.1242/jeb.02007.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

16

Obroucheva, N. V., I. A. Sinkevich, S. V. Lityagina, and G. V. Novikova. "Water relations in germinating seeds." Russian Journal of Plant Physiology 64, no. 4 (June 24, 2017): 625–33. http://dx.doi.org/10.1134/s102144371703013x.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

17

Noack, Detlef. "Wood-Water Relations. Christen Skaar." Quarterly Review of Biology 64, no. 4 (December 1989): 500–501. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/416506.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

18

Willmer, P. G. "Water relations of terrestrial arthropods." Trends in Ecology & Evolution 10, no. 4 (April 1995): 173. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0169-5347(00)89037-0.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

19

MARKHART, A. H. "Plant-Water Relations: Stomatal Function." Science 238, no. 4831 (November 27, 1987): 1297–98. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.238.4831.1297.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

20

RAVEN, JOHN A., and LINDA L. HANDLEY. "TRANSPORT PROCESSES AND WATER RELATIONS." New Phytologist 106 (June 28, 2008): 217–33. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.1987.tb04691.x.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

21

Barlow, EWR. "Water Relations of Expanding Leaves." Functional Plant Biology 13, no. 1 (1986): 45. http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/pp9860045.

Full text

Abstract:

The reactivity of leaf growth to changes in plant water status has been analysed in terms of leaf development, water transport and turgor. The different growth patterns of monocotyledonous and dicotyledonous leaves result in fundamental differences in the water relations of expanding leaves. Most monocotyledonous leaf cells complete their expansion phase within the protective older leaf bases, while the majority of dicotyledonous leaf cells expand in an exposed evaporative environment. The consequence of this morphological difference is that expanding monocotyledonous leaves behave similarly to other enclosed tissue during water stress by exhibiting turgor maintenance through osmotic adjustment. Expanding dicotyledonous leaves do not exhibit this response. The maintenance of turgor in monocotyledons in the absence of leaf expansion suggests that growth is controlled by the yield threshold of the cell wall during episodes of water stress.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

22

Rhizopoulou, Sophia, Kurt Heberlein, and Anna Kassianou. "Field water relations ofCapparis spinosaL." Journal of Arid Environments 36, no. 2 (June 1997): 237–48. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jare.1996.0207.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

23

Biggs, A. R. "Water Relations of Various Peach Cultivars in Relation to Peach Canker Disease." HortScience 28, no. 9 (September 1993): 939–41. http://dx.doi.org/10.21273/hortsci.28.9.939.

Full text

Abstract:

Whole-shoot water potential, osmotic potential of the xylem fluid, and bark water potential were examined from late winter through early spring for six peach [Prunus persica (L.) Batsch.] cultivars varying in relative susceptibility to Leucostoma canker. There were significant differences among cultivars for whole-shoot water potential on all 11 dates tested in 1986, but not in 1985. The date effect was not consistent among cultivars, although when averaged across dates, the whole-shoot water potential of `Loring' was significantly more negative than that of `Candor' or `Garnet Beauty'. There were significant differences among cultivars for xylem fluid osmotic potential on one of five dates tested in 1985 and three of 11 dates tested in 1986, although cultivar differences were not consistent between years. Cultivars exhibited differences in bark water potential on three of five dates tested in 1985, with `Loring' exhibiting the least negative values when averaged across dates. There were only occasional significant correlations of the water status characteristics with relative susceptibility to Leucostoma canker or suberin accumulation. Measurements of plant water status among cultivars or genotypes in peach do not appear to be reliable indicators of susceptibility to Leucostoma spp. or wound response.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

24

Espadafor, M., V. González-Dugo, F. Orgaz, L. Testi, M. López, and E. Fereres. "Water relations in almond trees under moderate water deficits." Acta Horticulturae, no. 1150 (January 2017): 113–18. http://dx.doi.org/10.17660/actahortic.2017.1150.16.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

25

Barrett, James E., and Terril A. Nell. "Water Relations and Water Potential Measurements for Vegetative Poinsettia." Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science 111, no. 5 (September 1986): 773–76. http://dx.doi.org/10.21273/jashs.111.5.773.

Full text

Abstract:

Abstract Pressure chamber and thermocouple psychrometer measurements of leaf water potentials in vegetative Euphorbia pulcherrima Willd. cv. Eckespoint C-l Red were evaluated. The 2 methods agreed within 0.2 MPa between −0.3 and −1.8 MPa and were equal at −1.1 MPa. Minimum daily water potential for nonstressed plants reached −0.67 MPa by 1230 hr. Abaxial water vapor conductance and water potential varied little between 1230 and 1630 hr. When drought was imposed, incipient stomatal closure occurred at −0.8 MPa with full closure observed at −1.2 MPa. Complete loss of turgor pressure occurred at water potentials between −1.2 and −1.4 MPa. The linear correlation coefficient for conductance and leaf-air temperature differential was 0.96, with leaf and air temperature equal when conductance was 0.6 cm·s−1. Xylem pressure potentials of upper leaves on drought-stressed plants declined to −1.7 MPa in 8 days and abscission of proximal leaves began. There was little change in xylem pressure potentials of upper leaves after leaf abscission began.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

26

Inman-Bamber, N. G., and D. M. Smith. "Water relations in sugarcane and response to water deficits." Field Crops Research 92, no. 2-3 (June 2005): 185–202. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2005.01.023.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

27

Vartiainen, T., A. Liimatainen, P. Kauranen, and L. Hiisvirta. "Relations between drinking water mutagenicity and water quality parameters." Chemosphere 17, no. 1 (January 1988): 189–202. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0045-6535(88)90056-2.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

28

Abu Rumman, G. A. "UNDERSTANDING WATER RELATIONS FOR SUSTAINABLE PRODUCTION." Acta Horticulturae, no. 1054 (October 2014): 169–74. http://dx.doi.org/10.17660/actahortic.2014.1054.19.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

29

De Gryze, C., J. De Riek, and P. C. Debergh. "WATER RELATIONS IN THE CULTURE VESSEL." Acta Horticulturae, no. 393 (March 1995): 39–44. http://dx.doi.org/10.17660/actahortic.1995.393.4.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

30

Berg, Virginia. "Tips for Teaching Plant Water Relations." American Biology Teacher 55, no. 2 (February 1, 1993): 96–99. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/4449593.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

31

Waring, R. H., and J. J. Landsberg. "Generalizing plant-water relations to landscapes." Journal of Plant Ecology 4, no. 1-2 (March 1, 2011): 101–13. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jpe/rtq041.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

32

Hohl, Michael, and Peter Schopfer. "Water Relations of Growing Maize Coleoptiles." Plant Physiology 95, no. 3 (March 1, 1991): 716–22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1104/pp.95.3.716.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

33

van Bavel, Cornelius H. M. "Water Relations of Plants and Soils." Soil Science 161, no. 4 (April 1996): 257–60. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00010694-199604000-00007.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

34

KRAMER, P. J. "Changing concepts regarding plant water relations." Plant, Cell and Environment 11, no. 7 (September 1988): 565–68. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3040.1988.tb01796.x.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

35

Ayerst, G. "Soil water relations, mechanisms and applications." International Biodeterioration 25, no. 6 (January 1989): 447–48. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0265-3036(89)90073-0.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

36

Turner, N. C. "Plant water relations and irrigation management." Agricultural Water Management 17, no. 1-3 (January 1990): 59–73. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0378-3774(90)90056-5.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

37

Measham, P. F., S. J. Wilson, A. J. Gracie, and S. A. Bound. "Tree water relations: Flow and fruit." Agricultural Water Management 137 (May 2014): 59–67. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2014.02.005.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

38

Maruta, E. "Winter water relations of timberline larch (." Trees 11, no. 2 (1996): 119. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s004680050067.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

39

Crombie, DS, and JA Milburn. "Water Relations of Rural Eucalypt Dieback." Australian Journal of Botany 36, no. 2 (1988): 233. http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/bt9880233.

Full text

Abstract:

The water relations of healthy and dieback-affected individuals of three Eucalyptus species typical of the northern tablelands of New South Wales were compared. Dawn water potentials of healthy and dieback-affected trees were all very similar. Midday water potentials of trees with the most severe dieback symptoms were often lower than those of nearby healthy trees by up to 0.6 MPa. Leaf con- ductances of the most severely dieback-affected trees were usually greater than those of healthy trees. Differences decreased with time and when more trees with less severe symptoms were measured late in the study no significant differences in water relations were found. It seems therefore that the effects of dieback on the water relations of trees are too small for measurements of leaf water potentials or leaf conductances to be useful indicators of disease severity in individual trees.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

40

Passioura, J. B. "An Impasse in Plant Water Relations?" Botanica Acta 104, no. 6 (December 1991): 405–11. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1438-8677.1991.tb00250.x.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

41

Pospisilova, J., J. Santrucek, L. Adamec, M. Brestic, M. Zima, R. Hojcus, M. Hudecova, et al. "Section 2 - Photosynthesis and water relations." Biologia plantarum 34, Suppl.1 (January 1, 1992): 497–511. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/bf02930803.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

42

Gervais, Patrick, Jean-Philippe Fasquel, and Paul Molin. "Water relations of fungal spore germination." Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 29, no. 6 (December 1988): 586–92. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/bf00260989.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

43

Améglio, T., A. Lacointe, H. Cochard, G. Alves, C. Bodet, M. Vandame, V. Valentin, et al. "WATER RELATIONS IN WALNUT DURING WINTER." Acta Horticulturae, no. 544 (January 2001): 239–46. http://dx.doi.org/10.17660/actahortic.2001.544.32.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

44

Vycius, Juozapas. "Water and Energy Relations in Lithuania." International Journal of Water Resources Development 18, no. 1 (March 2002): 87–98. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07900620220121675.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

45

Payne, William A. "Water Relations of Sparse Canopied Crops." Agronomy Journal 92, no. 5 (September 2000): 807. http://dx.doi.org/10.2134/agronj2000.925807x.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

46

BOHNE, GUIDO, HOLGER WOEHLECKE, and RUDOLF EHWALD. "Water Relations of the Pine Exine." Annals of Botany 96, no. 2 (May 16, 2005): 201–8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/aob/mci169.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

47

Haigh, AM, and EWR Barlow. "Water Relations of Tomato Seed Germination." Functional Plant Biology 14, no. 5 (1987): 485. http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/pp9870485.

Full text

Abstract:

Water uptake during the germination of UC 82B tomato seeds was triphasic. Seed Ψ measurements indicated that phase I imbibition occurred because of the large Ψ gradient between the seed and the imbibition solution (water). During phase II the seed Ψ was in equilibrium with the water. Phase III water uptake recommenced with the onset of radicle emergence without changes in Ψ or Ψπ. Changes in embryo water content were also triphasic. During phase II the embryo Ψ remained at - 1.5 MPa, not in equilibrium with the imbibing solution. At radicle emergence it was - 0.8 MPa and rose to -0.3 MPa as the radicle elongated. There was no evidence of a lowering of embryo Ψπ nor of a build up of Ψp prior to radicle emergence. Water uptake studies with excised embryos indicated that, within the seed, the enclosing tissues prevented the embryo from taking up water. It is suggested that embryo water content is restricted by the constraint on embryo expansion caused by the enclosing endosperm tissue. Lowering of embryo Ψπ to build up Ψp is not necessary for radicle emergence. The control of germination may lie in the mechanism which leads to weakening of this mechanical restraint of the endosperm.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

48

Pritchard, Jeremy, Sam Winch, and Nick Gould. "Phloem water relations and root growth." Functional Plant Biology 27, no. 6 (2000): 539. http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/pp99175.

Full text

Abstract:

In this paper the biophysical basis of cell expansion is described, paying particular attention to the waterrelations that underpin the process. The connection of growing root cells to the rest of the plant will be addressed and possible control points in the hardware identified. Examples of environmental modification of root extension, and therefore water and solute import, are given, and the relationship with current accepted theories of solute translocation discussed. The opportunities for delivery of solutes and water to be regulated by the growing root itself will be considered, in particular the dual role of cell wall loosening in decreasing both sink cell turgor and water potential. We conclude that a significant proportion of the water for cell expansion can enter growing root cells through the phloem. The physiological data presented rule out alterations in the turgor pressure difference between sieve element and cell as a modulator of solute flux. The plasmodesmata are identified as the major control point of solute flux along the symplastic pathway.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

49

Fitzgerald, Patrick J. "Developing Working Relations With Water Boards." Opflow 12, no. 4 (April 1986): 1–5. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/j.1551-8701.1986.tb00423.x.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

50

Díaz, Juan C., Kenneth Shackel, and Ellen Sutter. "WATER RELATIONS OF TISSUE-CULTURED APPLE SHOOTS UNDER WATER DEFICITS." HortScience 27, no. 6 (June 1992): 572b—572. http://dx.doi.org/10.21273/hortsci.27.6.572b.

Full text

Abstract:

The contribution of in vitro-formed roots to the water status of tissue culture plants was studied by observing the stomatal responses of rooted and unrooted apple shoots. Stomatal conductance was measured on whole plants with a modified steady state porometer in a temperature-controlled room. The porometer was maintained at a steady 90% RH and conductance was measured every 30 seconds. Plants were kept in the gas exchange system for about 28 h. Steady state values of stomatal conductance for rooted and unrooted shoots were 220 (S.E= 19) and 163 (S.E=23) mmol m-2 s-1, respectively. When the plants were exposed to a light stimulus (1200 μmol m-2 s-1), rooted shoots showed an increase of about 64% in stomatal conductance. In the absence of roots, no response to light was observed. These results suggest that the presence of the roots improved, at least partially, water uptake and plant water status.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!