Academic literature on the topic 'War science'
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'War science.'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Journal articles on the topic "War science"
HEYLIN, MICHAEL. "Science & War." Chemical & Engineering News 73, no. 14 (April 3, 1995): 3. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/cen-v073n014.p003.
Full textDay, Charles. "Cold War science." Physics Today 69, no. 2 (February 2016): 8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/pt.3.3062.
Full textZiman, John. "Science and war." Nature 414, no. 6859 (November 2001): 18–19. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/35102100.
Full textRoland, Alex. "Science and War." Osiris 1 (January 1985): 247–72. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/368648.
Full textKOSHLAND, D. E. "War and Science." Science 251, no. 4993 (February 1, 1991): 497. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.251.4993.497.
Full textBreithaupt, Holger. "Science and war." EMBO reports 3, no. 7 (July 2002): 596–98. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/embo-reports/kvf146.
Full textRoberts, L. "A War Within a War." Science 343, no. 6177 (March 20, 2014): 1302–5. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.343.6177.1302.
Full textWeikart, Richard. "Science and religion at war about war." Metascience 28, no. 3 (July 26, 2019): 425–28. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11016-019-00443-9.
Full textBelozerov, Vasily K. "The Political Science of War in the System of Scientific Knowledge." Russian Journal of Philosophical Sciences 63, no. 11 (March 15, 2021): 74–90. http://dx.doi.org/10.30727/0235-1188-2020-63-11-74-90.
Full textPotter, Elizabeth, Sharyn Clough, Cassandra L. Pinnick, Noretta Koertge, and Robert F. Almeder. "The Science War Front." Women's Review of Books 22, no. 1 (October 2004): 7. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/4024455.
Full textDissertations / Theses on the topic "War science"
Kim, Sang Ki. "Third-party intervention in civil wars: motivation, war outcomes, and post-war development." Diss., University of Iowa, 2012. https://ir.uiowa.edu/etd/3483.
Full textSears, Todd Richard. "War as Art or Science: A Humanist Vision." Thesis, Monterey, California. Naval Postgraduate School, 1991. http://hdl.handle.net/10945/43543.
Full textThis thesis attempts to answer the question, Is War art of science? In doing so it draws heavily upon Thomas Kuhn's humanistic philosophy of science. If War can be separated theoretically into two distinct analytical units, preparation for war, and conduct of war, then the answer to the question becomes more accessible. The war preparation process is notably similar to the Kuhnian dynamic of scientific process, i.e., the evolution of a paradigm through inter-disciplinary criticism and rearticulation. A case study of post-WWII US nuclear strategy is offered to substantiate the claim that war preparation operates in a way that is remarkably similar to Kuhnian science. So, if war preparation is scientific, then the conduct of war, a fundamentally different activity, may be seen as artistic. This case is made by drawing heavily upon the writings of General Carl von Clausewitz, and the 18th century German idealist Immanuel Kant. The end result of the work is to posit the existence of two types of men necessary for the execution of War, those who demonstrate ability in the sublime genius of science, and those who are more suited to develop the heroic genius of battle. The question then arises as pertains to the US military educational system's ability to identify these men and intensify their development within each's specific forte.
Hall, Charlie. "British exploitation of German science and technology from War to post-War, 1943-1948." Thesis, University of Kent, 2016. https://kar.kent.ac.uk/60242/.
Full textQuek, Ch-yuan Kaiy. "Rationalist causes of war : mechanisms, experiments, and East Asian wars." Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2013. http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84849.
Full textCataloged from PDF version of thesis.
Includes bibliographical references.
This dissertation specifies and tests rationalist mechanisms of war. Why would rational states fight each other despite their incentives for peaceful bargains that would avoid the costs of war? In the rationalist theory of war, private information and the commitment problem are the key causes of war. I study the effects of these factors - and the mechanisms regulating their effects - through randomized experiments, historical analysis of the decision processes in three wars, and a comparative study of all international wars fought in East Asia in the last century. This is the first integrated study of rationalist causes of war that combines randomized experiments with historical cases. Despite a wide theoretical literature, there are few empirical tests of rationalist explanations for war. I use experimental and historical evidence to show that the commitment problem has strong positive effects on conflict. The effects of private information are less clear. Next, I specify six mechanisms that regulate the effects of the commitment problem and the private-information problem: three mechanisms (exogenous, endogenous, and inadvertent enforcement) for the first problem and three mechanisms (signaling with sunk cost, implementation cost, and salient contradiction) for the second. The experimental and historical evidence largely converge. Each of the three enforcement mechanisms calms the commitment problem and reduces the risk of conflict. Evidence for the three signaling mechanisms is mixed. Finally, I use the case universe of East Asian wars to assess the relevance of the mechanisms, suggest theoretical refinements, and infer alternative theories of war.
by Ch-yuan Kaiy Quek.
Ph.D.
Gallagher, Ron. "Science fiction and language : language and the imagination in post-war science fiction." Thesis, University of Warwick, 1986. http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/90798/.
Full textDaley, Christopher. "British science fiction and the Cold War, 1945-1969." Thesis, University of Westminster, 2013. https://westminsterresearch.westminster.ac.uk/item/8yz67/british-science-fiction-and-the-cold-war-1945-1969.
Full textBarakat, Sultan. "Reviving war-damaged settlements : towards an international charter for reconstruction after war." Thesis, University of York, 1993. http://etheses.whiterose.ac.uk/4661/.
Full textSchub, Robert Jay. "Certainty and War." Thesis, Harvard University, 2016. http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:33493541.
Full textGovernment
Romaya, Bassam. "Philosophizing War: Arguments in the War on Iraq." Diss., Temple University Libraries, 2010. http://cdm16002.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/p245801coll10/id/78961.
Full textPh.D.
I set out to analyze four main philosophical arguments which have dominated the Iraq war debate. Each of these arguments has been used by philosophers to varying degrees to assess the circumstances surrounding the war. The discussions customarily focused on four key issues: just war theory, humanitarian intervention, democratization, and preventive war. In each case, I examine the argument's methods, shortcomings, and implications, to conclude that each fails to satisfactorily address, explain, or elucidate the highly controversial war. I argue that we simply cannot rely on a meager set of arguments to provide us with greater insight or genuine understanding of this war, as well as new or postmodern wars more generally. First, arguments that focus on the just war tradition overlook key events and underemphasize developments that have effectively eroded the tradition's defining concepts, such as the distinctions between combatant/noncombatant, states/non-states, victories/defeats, armies/non-state or non-nation actors. Second, theoretical analyses are routinely misappropriated or misapplied; this is especially evident in calls for humanitarian intervention, implemented for past harms committed, using backward-causing logic intended to make up for past inaction, rather than halting ongoing or imminent harm. Third, the focus on forcible democratization overlooks the high probability for failure in such pursuits and readily dismisses moral, legal, economic, educational, and cultural obstacles to democratic national building. Fourth, arguments which focus on preventive war suffer from similar problems encountered with the previous three, especially since it is unclear that the event could be characterized as a case of preventive war. The relationship between belligerent state and target state was not one in which the target state posed a future or distant threat to the belligerent state. Collectively, the arguments err in their uncritical acceptance of methodological analyses that have no genuine application to the matter at issue; that is, each misunderstands the nature of new or postmodern wars and clings to concepts relevant to modern wars, which do not factor in developments such as non-state actors, the spread of global capitalism, economic and cultural globalization, strategic objectives or military preeminence, imperialist aims or empire-building.
Temple University--Theses
Singh, Sanjana P. "Framing Freedom Wars: US Rhetoric in Afghanistan During the Cold War and the War on Terror." Scholarship @ Claremont, 2015. http://scholarship.claremont.edu/scripps_theses/541.
Full textBooks on the topic "War science"
Solovey, Mark, and Hamilton Cravens, eds. Cold War Social Science. New York: Palgrave Macmillan US, 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9781137013224.
Full textSolovey, Mark, and Christian Dayé, eds. Cold War Social Science. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-70246-5.
Full textThe Republican war on science. New York: Basic Books, 2005.
Find full textThe Republican war on science. New York: BasicBooks, 2006.
Find full textMacleod, Roy M., ed. Science and the Pacific War. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 1999. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-9766-6.
Full textMooney, Chris. The Republican war on science. New York, NY: Basic Books, 2006.
Find full textNova war. London: Tor, 2010.
Find full textStark's War. London, Great Britain: Titan Publishing Company, 2011.
Find full textCaro, Dennis R. Devine war. New York: Arbor House, 1986.
Find full textAlvin, Toffler. War and anti-war. New York: Warner Books, 1995.
Find full textBook chapters on the topic "War science"
McAndrew, Francis T. "War." In Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science, 1–5. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6_2235-1.
Full textMcAndrew, Francis T. "War." In Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science, 8471–75. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19650-3_2235.
Full textHughes, Matthew. "Technology, science and war." In Palgrave Advances in Modern Military History, 231–57. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2006. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9780230625372_13.
Full textRasmussen, Anne. "Science and Technology." In A Companion to World War I, 307–22. Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell, 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9781444323634.ch21.
Full textBroks, Peter. "Science and Religion." In Media Science before the Great War, 53–65. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 1996. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-25043-1_5.
Full textBluth, Christoph. "Science and Technology." In Palgrave Advances in Cold War History, 189–209. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2006. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9780230502147_8.
Full textJervis, Robert. "Political Science Perspectives." In The Origins of World War Two, 207–26. London: Macmillan Education UK, 2003. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4039-3738-4_13.
Full textWatkins, Peter. "The War Game." In 100 Science Fiction Films, 193–94. London: British Film Institute, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-92604-6_96.
Full textTravis, Anthony S. "The Great War." In SpringerBriefs in Molecular Science, 73–83. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19357-1_3.
Full textHowkins, Adrian. "Antarctic science and the Cold War." In Cold Science, 277–95. Abingdon, Oxon ; New York, NY: Routledge, 2019. | Series: Routledge studies in the history of science, technology and medicine; 38: Routledge, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781315172736-16.
Full textConference papers on the topic "War science"
Lunkov, Aleksandr. "Peace science and war science: approaches to creation and heuristic potential." In VII Information school of a young scientist. Central Scientific Library of the Urals Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.32460/ishmu-2019-7-0004.
Full textKroupova, Bohumila, and Bohumil Vybiral. "The principles of pre-war didactics of science." In DIDFYZ 2019: Formation of the Natural Science Image of the World in the 21st Century. AIP Publishing, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.5124761.
Full textOmar, Aram Wasman. "The View of War in the Poetry of the 1st World War." In 8TH INTERNATIONAL VISIBLE CONFERENCE ON EDUCATIONAL SCIENCE AND APPLIED LINGUISTICS. Ishik University, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.23918/vesal2017.a2.
Full textBenitez-Manaut, Raul. "CHIAPAS: POLITICS OR WAR?" In Proceedings of the Forty-Eighth Pugwash Conference on Science and World Affairs. WORLD SCIENTIFIC, 2001. http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/9789812810212_0010.
Full textRamirez, J. Martin. "WAR IS BIOLOGICALLY AVOIDABLE." In Proceedings of the Forty-Eighth Pugwash Conference on Science and World Affairs. WORLD SCIENTIFIC, 2001. http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/9789812810212_0060.
Full textAvery, John. "POVERTY, DISEASE AND WAR." In Proceedings of the Forty-Eighth Pugwash Conference on Science and World Affairs. WORLD SCIENTIFIC, 2001. http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/9789812810212_0061.
Full textPERRY, JOHN S. "FROM CONCERN TO CONTROVERSY SCIENCE AND NON-SCIENCE IN GLOBAL CLIMATE." In International Seminar on Nuclear War and Planetary Emergencies 34th Session. WORLD SCIENTIFIC, 2006. http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/9789812773890_0009.
Full textLORD ALDERDICE, JOHN. "A SCIENCE OF THE IRRATIONAL CAN HELP PROTECT SCIENCE FROM IRRATIONAL ATTACKS." In International Seminar on Nuclear War and Planetary Emergencies 42nd Session. WORLD SCIENTIFIC, 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/9789814327503_0096.
Full textSOBEL, ANNETIE L. "ONE SCIENCE FOR CBRN MITIGATION." In International Seminar on Nuclear War and Planetary Emergencies 42nd Session. WORLD SCIENTIFIC, 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/9789814327503_0065.
Full textAvery, John. "A WORLD FREE FROM WAR." In Proceedings of the Forty-Ninth Pugwash Conference on Science and World Affairs. WORLD SCIENTIFIC, 2001. http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/9789812799647_0061.
Full textReports on the topic "War science"
Kisner, Frank J. Morale-The 10th Principle of War: Returning the Art to the Science of War. Fort Belvoir, VA: Defense Technical Information Center, May 2000. http://dx.doi.org/10.21236/ada381615.
Full textGosling, F. G. The Manhattan Project: Science in the Second World War. Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI), August 1990. http://dx.doi.org/10.2172/5663506.
Full textVicente, Joao. Beyond-the-Box" Thinking on Future War: The Art and Science of Unrestricted Warfare". Fort Belvoir, VA: Defense Technical Information Center, April 2009. http://dx.doi.org/10.21236/ada539664.
Full textTedesco, Vincent J., and III. Tactical Alchemy: Heavy Division Tactical Maneuver Planning Guides and the Army's Neglect of the Science of War. Fort Belvoir, VA: Defense Technical Information Center, December 1999. http://dx.doi.org/10.21236/ada381774.
Full textDEFENSE SCIENCE BOARD WASHINGTON DC. Defense Science Board Task Force on Deployment of Members of the National Guard and Reserve in the Global War on Terrorism. Fort Belvoir, VA: Defense Technical Information Center, September 2007. http://dx.doi.org/10.21236/ada474519.
Full textSatapathy, S., and C. Persad. Friction and Wear Sciences for a Highly Durable Railgun Weapon. Fort Belvoir, VA: Defense Technical Information Center, October 2007. http://dx.doi.org/10.21236/ada474864.
Full textJanigo, Kristy A., Mee Jekal, and Theresa Lastovich. What Did People Wear to the March for Science?: Social Change and Design Education. Ames (Iowa): Iowa State University. Library, January 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.31274/itaa.8869.
Full textGowen, Timothy E. A Proposal to Rethink the Way We Develop National Military Strategy: More Science, Less Art. Fort Belvoir, VA: Defense Technical Information Center, March 2005. http://dx.doi.org/10.21236/ada431832.
Full textMcGee, Steven, Amanda Durik, and Jess Zimmerman. The Impact of Text Genre on Science Learning in an Authentic Science Learning Environment. The Learning Partnership, April 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.51420/conf.2015.2.
Full textJones, Nicole S. 2018 Impression, Pattern and Trace Evidence Symposium. RTI Press, May 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.3768/rtipress.2018.cp.0006.1805.
Full text