Academic literature on the topic 'Vis attractiva concursu'
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Vis attractiva concursu.'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Journal articles on the topic "Vis attractiva concursu"
Taghinezhad-S, Sedigheh, Amir Hossein Mohseni, Luis G. Bermúdez-Humarán, Vincenzo Casolaro, Naima G. Cortes-Perez, Hossein Keyvani, and Jesus Simal-Gandara. "Probiotic-Based Vaccines May Provide Effective Protection against COVID-19 Acute Respiratory Disease." Vaccines 9, no. 5 (May 6, 2021): 466. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vaccines9050466.
Full textRuffino, Francesco, and Maria Grazia Grimaldi. "Nanoporous Gold-Based Sensing." Coatings 10, no. 9 (September 19, 2020): 899. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/coatings10090899.
Full textDissertations / Theses on the topic "Vis attractiva concursu"
LUNETTI, CHIARA TERESA MARIA. "ACTIONS DERIVING DIRECTLY FROM INSOLVENCY PROCEEDINGS AND CLOSELY LINKED WITH THEM UNDER REGULATION EU 848/2015 ON INSOLVENCY PROCEEDINGS." Doctoral thesis, Università degli Studi di Milano, 2020. http://hdl.handle.net/2434/710018.
Full textHistorically, the topic of individual actions directly deriving from and closely linked with insolvency proceedings (hereinafter referred to as “Annex Actions”) has been addressed in the European scenario with reference to the scope ratione materiae of the Brussels Convention dated 1968 on the jurisdiction, recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters (the “Brussels Convention”). In the absence (at that time) of Community rules on cross-border insolvencies, in the Gourdain judgment the ECJ interpreted the notion of Annex Actions under the prism of the exception relating to “bankruptcy, proceedings relating to the winding-up of insolvent companies or other legal persons, judicial arrangements, compositions and analogous proceedings”, set forth by Article 1(2)(2) Brussels Convention. It was on that occasion that the Court held that actions which are related to insolvency proceedings are excluded from the scope of the Brussels Convention (now the Brussels 1a Regulation), with the proviso that they derive directly from insolvency proceedings and are closely linked with them (thus coining what has been called, over the years, the “Gourdain Formula”). The interpretative uncertainties arising from such an ambiguous wording - at the time referring only to the scope of application of the Brussels Convention - were not removed (and possibly were even exacerbated) by the introduction of the European regime on insolvency proceedings. Indeed, the Regulation (EC) 1346/2000 (the “Insolvency Regulation”), on the one hand, revealed a serious regulatory gap, since it did not provide for a rule on the jurisdiction of Annex Actions and, on the other hand, even where it mentioned them (for purposes other than jurisdiction), it laconically restated the Gourdain Formula, with no further clarifications. The nebulous legislative framework described above has been partly clarified by Regulation (EU) 2015/848 (the “Recast Regulation”), which has remedied the aforementioned omission, expressly providing for the (halved) European vis attractiva concursus. According to that principle, the courts of the Member State in the territory of which insolvency proceedings are opened, are vested with the jurisdiction to hear and determine Annex Actions. The impact of the reform over the “dynamic” profile of the vis attractiva concursus must be positively assessed since it has dispelled many of the doubts concerning the allocation of jurisdiction on Annex Actions. Yet, the problem of the autonomous definition of Annex Actions remains partially unsolved, because also under the Recast Regulation, the contours of that concept continue to be defined by the vague Gourdain Formula. Only partial indications can be drawn from Recital 35 Recast Regulation and, above all, from the extensive case-law of the ECJ. The latter, however, allows only to some extent to draw a systematic notion of Annex Actions, as it substantially reveals a wavering orientation, which does not permit to trace (yet) a general criterion, certain and shared on this point. It is suggested that, for the purposes of the European legislation, Annex Actions are those actions underpinning a right or obligation which stems from the opening of insolvency proceedings, whose DNA, we might say, is ontologically linked to insolvency proceedings. They would count a very small number of actions such as (predictably) avoidance actions, liability actions against the trustee and other bodies of the procedure, and actions arising from the termination of contracts exercised by the trustee by virtue of the express powers conferred upon him by insolvency law. On the contrary, all other actions in respect of which the procedure is a neutral (legal) event should not be characterised as Annex Actions (e.g. actions that have only an occasional link with insolvency proceedings and those that existed in the legal sphere of the insolvent debtor prior to the opening of the procedure). However, considerable doubts remain with respect to the characterisation of some actions, which can be placed in an uncertain twilight-zone at the crossline between civil, commercial law and bankruptcy law. Although the legal foundation of those action exists even before insolvency proceedings, they prove to be affected by the opening of the procedure to such an extent that they may be considered as different actions. In the wake of these preliminary observations, the thesis aims to specifically analyse the topic of Annex Actions under the European regime of cross-border insolvencies. Not only it investigates the procedural aspects of the issue (in particular, the jurisdiction), but it also assesses whether it is possible to draw an autonomous notion of Annex Action and elaborate a catalogue of actions, which, despite the differences inherent in each national system, reveal a jus commune europaeum that allows to trace them back under the umbrella of the Recast Regulation.
La thèse intitulé « les actions qui découlent directement de la procédure d’insolvabilité et qui y sont étroitement liées dans le cadre du Règlement UE 2015/848 sur les procédures d'insolvabilité » se concentre sur les critères de détermination des juridictions compétentes en matière de litiges découlant de la procédure d’insolvabilité dans le contexte de procédures transfrontalières. Selon son Article 1(1)(b), les procédures d’insolvabilité sont exclues du Règlement (UE) n° 1215/2012 concernant la compétence judiciaire, la reconnaissance et l’exécution des décisions en matière civile et commerciale (« Règlement Bruxelles ») et devraient relever du champ d’application du Règlement (UE) n° 848/2015 relatif aux procédures d’insolvabilité (« Règlement Refondu »). Pour cette raison, en principe, l’interprétation de deux susmentionnés Règlements devrait, autant que possible, combler les lacunes entre les deux instruments. Le texte du nouvel article 6 du Règlement Refondu prévoit désormais que les juridictions compétentes en vertu de son article 3 soient compétentes également pour toutes les actions qui découlent directement de la procédure d’insolvabilité et y sont étroitement liées. Toutefois, ce principe (appelé la vis attractiva concursus européenne), malgré quelques clarifications ont été fournies par la Cour de Justice, ne résoudre pas la question et l’interprétation du champ d’application du Règlement Refondu par rapport au Règlement Bruxelles est encore douteuse, car il y a encore beaucoup de zones grises dans l’interprétation de cette règle. L'objectif de la thèse est d'analyser quel type d'actions doit être considéré comme « découlant directement » et « étroitement lié » aux procédures d'insolvabilité, et d'analyser les cas où il est controversé de savoir si l'action doit entrer dans le champ d'application du Règlement Refondu plutôt que dans celui du Règlement Bruxelles.
Grompe, Susen [Verfasser]. "Die vis attractiva concursus im Europäischen Insolvenzrecht : Ein Instrument zur Konkretisierung des Insolvenzstatuts / Susen Grompe." Baden-Baden : Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, 2018. http://d-nb.info/117574252X/34.
Full textSmržová, Martina. "Mezinárodní insolvenční právo." Master's thesis, 2012. http://www.nusl.cz/ntk/nusl-311289.
Full textBooks on the topic "Vis attractiva concursu"
Willemer, Charlotte. Vis attractiva concursus und die Europäische Insolvenzverordnung. Mohr Siebeck, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1628/978-3-16-158506-7.
Full textGrompe, Susen. Die Vis Attractiva Concursus Im Europaischen Insolvenzrecht: Ein Instrument Zur Konkretisierung des Insolvenzstatuts. Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft, 2018.
Find full textBook chapters on the topic "Vis attractiva concursu"
Grompe, Susen. "Kapitel 2: Die vis attractiva concursus des europäischenInsolvenzrechts." In Die vis attractiva concursus im Europäischen Insolvenzrecht, 73–129. Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.5771/9783845295336-73.
Full textGrompe, Susen. "Titelei/Inhaltsverzeichnis." In Die vis attractiva concursus im Europäischen Insolvenzrecht, 1–20. Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.5771/9783845295336-1.
Full textGrompe, Susen. "Kapitel 3: Die Übertragbarkeit des Instruments der vis attractivaconcursus." In Die vis attractiva concursus im Europäischen Insolvenzrecht, 130–296. Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.5771/9783845295336-130.
Full textGrompe, Susen. "Einleitung." In Die vis attractiva concursus im Europäischen Insolvenzrecht, 21–26. Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.5771/9783845295336-21.
Full textGrompe, Susen. "Kapitel 1: Die insolvente Auslandsgesellschaft zwischenGesellschafts- und In." In Die vis attractiva concursus im Europäischen Insolvenzrecht, 27–72. Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.5771/9783845295336-27.
Full textGrompe, Susen. "Kapitel 4: Die Bestimmung der Einzelverfahren." In Die vis attractiva concursus im Europäischen Insolvenzrecht, 297–322. Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.5771/9783845295336-297.
Full textGrompe, Susen. "Schlussbetrachtung." In Die vis attractiva concursus im Europäischen Insolvenzrecht, 323–28. Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.5771/9783845295336-323.
Full textGrompe, Susen. "Literaturverzeichnis." In Die vis attractiva concursus im Europäischen Insolvenzrecht, 329–53. Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.5771/9783845295336-329.
Full text