Academic literature on the topic 'Viroplasm Structures (VSs)'

ABSTRACT Rotavirus morphogenesis starts in intracellular inclusion bodies called viroplasms. RNA replication and packaging are mediated by several viral proteins, of which VP1, the RNA-dependent RNA polymerase, and VP2, the core scaffolding protein, were shown to be sufficient to provide replicase activity in vitro. In vivo, however, viral replication complexes also contain the nonstructural proteins NSP2 and NSP5, which were shown to be essential for replication, to interact with each other, and to form viroplasm-like structures (VLS) when coexpressed in uninfected cells. In order to gain a better understanding of the intermediates formed during viral replication, this work focused on the interactions of NSP5 with VP1, VP2, and NSP2. We demonstrated a strong interaction of VP1 with NSP5 but only a weak one with NSP2 in cotransfected cells in the absence of other viral proteins or viral RNA. By contrast, we failed to coimmunoprecipitate VP2 with anti-NSP5 antibodies or NSP5 with anti-VP2 antibodies. We constructed a tagged form of VP1, which was found to colocalize in viroplasms and in VLS formed by NSP5 and NSP2. The tagged VP1 was able to replace VP1 structurally by being incorporated into progeny viral particles. When applying anti-tag-VP1 or anti-NSP5 antibodies, coimmunoprecipitation of tagged VP1 with NSP5 was found. Using deletion mutants of NSP5 or different fragments of NSP5 fused to enhanced green fluorescent protein, we identified the 48 C-terminal amino acids as the region essential for interaction with VP1.

ABSTRACT The rotavirus NSP5 protein directs the formation of viroplasm-like structures (VLS) and is required for viroplasm formation within infected cells. In this report, we have defined signals within the C-terminal 21 amino acids of NSP5 that are required for VLS formation and that direct the insolubility and hyperphosphorylation of NSP5. Deleting C-terminal residues of NSP5 dramatically increased the solubility of N-terminally tagged NSP5 and prevented NSP5 hyperphosphorylation. Computer modeling and analysis of the NSP5 C terminus revealed the presence of an amphipathic α-helix spanning 21 C-terminal residues that is conserved among rotaviruses. Proline-scanning mutagenesis of the predicted helix revealed that single-amino-acid substitutions abolish NSP5 insolubility and hyperphosphorylation. Helix-disrupting NSP5 mutations also abolished localization of green fluorescent protein (GFP)-NSP5 fusions into VLS and directly correlate VLS formation with NSP5 insolubility. All mutations introduced into the hydrophobic face of the predicted NSP5 α-helix disrupted VLS formation, NSP5 insolubility, and the accumulation of hyperphosphorylated NSP5 isoforms. Some NSP5 mutants were highly soluble but still were hyperphosphorylated, indicating that NSP5 insolubility was not required for hyperphosphorylation. Expression of GFP containing the last 68 residues of NSP5 at its C terminus resulted in the formation of punctate VLS within cells. Interestingly, GFP-NSP5-C68 was diffusely dispersed in the cytoplasm when calcium was depleted from the medium, and after calcium resupplementation GFP-NSP5-C68 rapidly accumulated into punctate VLS. A potential calcium switch, formed by two tandem pseudo-EF-hand motifs (DxDxD), is present just upstream of the predicted α-helix. Mutagenesis of either DxDxD motif abolished the regulatory effect of calcium on VLS formation and resulted in the constitutive assembly of GFP-NSP5-C68 into punctate VLS. These results reveal specific residues within the NSP5 C-terminal domain that direct NSP5 hyperphosphorylation, insolubility, and VLS formation in addition to defining residues that constitute a calcium-dependent trigger of VLS formation. These studies identify functional determinants within the C terminus of NSP5 that regulate VLS formation and provide a target for inhibiting NSP5-directed VLS functions during rotavirus replication.

ABSTRACT Molecular events and the interdependence of the two rotavirus nonstructural proteins, NSP5 and NSP2, in producing viroplasm-like structures (VLS) were previously evaluated by using transient cellular coexpression of the genes for the two proteins, and VLS domains as well as the NSP2-binding region of NSP5 were mapped in the context of NSP2. Review of the previous studies led us to postulate that NSP2 binding of NSP5 may block the N terminus of NSP5 or render it inaccessible and that any similar N-terminal blockage may render NSP5 alone capable of producing VLS independent of NSP2. This possibility was addressed in this report by using two forms of NSP5-green fluorescent protein (GFP) chimeras wherein GFP is fused at either the N or the C terminus of NSP5 (GFP-NSP5 and NSP5-GFP) and evaluating their VLS-forming capability (by light and electron microscopy) and phosphorylation and multimerization potential independent of NSP2. Our results demonstrate that NSP5 alone can form VLS when the N terminus is blocked by fusion with a nonrotavirus protein (GFP-NSP5) but the C terminus is unmodified. Only GFP-NSP5 was able to undergo hyperphosphorylation and multimerization with the native form of NSP5, emphasizing the importance of an unmodified C terminus for these events. Deletion analysis of NSP5 mapped the essential signals for VLS formation to the C terminus and clearly suggested that hyperphosphorylation of NSP5 is not required for VLS formation. The present study emphasizes in general that when fusion proteins are used for functional studies, constructs that represent fusions at both the N and the C termini of the protein should be evaluated.

Viruses have evolved precise mechanisms for using the cellular physiological pathways for their perpetuation. These virus-driven biochemical events must be separated in space and time from those of the host cell. In recent years, granular structures, known for over a century for rabies virus, were shown to host viral gene function and were named using terms such as viroplasms, replication sites, inclusion bodies, or viral factories (VFs). More recently, these VFs were shown to be liquid-like, sharing properties with membrane-less organelles driven by liquid–liquid phase separation (LLPS) in a process widely referred to as biomolecular condensation. Some of the best described examples of these structures come from negative stranded RNA viruses, where micrometer size VFs are formed toward the end of the infectious cycle. We here discuss some basic principles of LLPS in connection with several examples of VFs and propose a view, which integrates viral replication mechanisms with the biochemistry underlying liquid-like organelles. In this view, viral protein and RNA components gradually accumulate up to a critical point during infection where phase separation is triggered. This yields an increase in transcription that leads in turn to increased translation and a consequent growth of initially formed condensates. According to chemical principles behind phase separation, an increase in the concentration of components increases the size of the condensate. A positive feedback cycle would thus generate in which crucial components, in particular nucleoproteins and viral polymerases, reach their highest levels required for genome replication. Progress in understanding viral biomolecular condensation leads to exploration of novel therapeutics. Furthermore, it provides insights into the fundamentals of phase separation in the regulation of cellular gene function given that virus replication and transcription, in particular those requiring host polymerases, are governed by the same biochemical principles.

Viruses have evolved precise mechanisms for using the cellular physiological pathways for their perpetuation. These virus-driven biochemical events must be separated in space and time from those of the host cell. In recent years, granular structures, known for over a century for rabies virus, were shown to host viral gene function and were named using terms such as viroplasms, replication sites, inclusion bodies, or viral factories (VFs). More recently, these VFs were shown to be liquid-like, sharing properties with membrane-less organelles driven by liquid–liquid phase separation (LLPS) in a process widely referred to as biomolecular condensation. Some of the best described examples of these structures come from negative stranded RNA viruses, where micrometer size VFs are formed toward the end of the infectious cycle. We here discuss some basic principles of LLPS in connection with several examples of VFs and propose a view, which integrates viral replication mechanisms with the biochemistry underlying liquid-like organelles. In this view, viral protein and RNA components gradually accumulate up to a critical point during infection where phase separation is triggered. This yields an increase in transcription that leads in turn to increased translation and a consequent growth of initially formed condensates. According to chemical principles behind phase separation, an increase in the concentration of components increases the size of the condensate. A positive feedback cycle would thus generate in which crucial components, in particular nucleoproteins and viral polymerases, reach their highest levels required for genome replication. Progress in understanding viral biomolecular condensation leads to exploration of novel therapeutics. Furthermore, it provides insights into the fundamentals of phase separation in the regulation of cellular gene function given that virus replication and transcription, in particular those requiring host polymerases, are governed by the same biochemical principles.

ABSTRACT One step of the life cycle common to all rotaviruses (RV) studied so far is the formation of viroplasms, membrane-less cytosolic inclusions providing a microenvironment for early morphogenesis and RNA replication. Viroplasm-like structures (VLS) are simplified viroplasm models consisting of complexes of nonstructural protein 5 (NSP5) with the RV core shell VP2 or NSP2. We identified and characterized the domains required for NSP5-VP2 interaction and VLS formation. VP2 mutations L124A, V865A, and I878A impaired both NSP5 hyperphosphorylation and NSP5/VP2 VLS formation. Moreover, NSP5-VP2 interaction does not depend on NSP5 hyperphosphorylation. The NSP5 tail region is required for VP2 interaction. Notably, VP2 L124A expression acts as a dominant-negative element by disrupting the formation of either VLS or viroplasms and blocking RNA synthesis. In silico analyses revealed that VP2 L124, V865, and I878 are conserved among RV species A to H. Detailed knowledge of the protein interaction interface required for viroplasm formation may facilitate the design of broad-spectrum antivirals to block RV replication. IMPORTANCE Alternative treatments to combat rotavirus infection are a requirement for susceptible communities where vaccines cannot be applied. This demand is urgent for newborn infants, immunocompromised patients, adults traveling to high-risk regions, and even for the livestock industry. Aside from structural and physiological divergences among RV species studied before now, all replicate within cytosolic inclusions termed viroplasms. These inclusions are composed of viral and cellular proteins and viral RNA. Viroplasm-like structures (VLS), composed of RV protein NSP5 with either NSP2 or VP2, are models for investigating viroplasms. In this study, we identified a conserved amino acid in the VP2 protein, L124, necessary for its interaction with NSP5 and the formation of both VLSs and viroplasms. As RV vaccines cover a narrow range of viral strains, the identification of VP2 L124 residue lays the foundations for the design of drugs that specifically block NSP5-VP2 interaction as a broad-spectrum RV antiviral.

ABSTRACTRotavirus replicates in unique virus-induced cytoplasmic inclusion bodies called viroplasms (VMs), the composition and structure of which have yet to be understood. Based on the analysis of a few proteins, earlier studies reported that rotavirus infection inhibits stress granule (SG) formation and disrupts P bodies (PBs). However, the recent demonstration that rotavirus infection induces cytoplasmic relocalization and colocalization with VMs of several nuclear hnRNPs and AU-rich element-binding proteins (ARE-BPs), which are known components of SGs and PBs, suggested the possibility of rotavirus-induced remodeling of SGs and PBs, prompting us to analyze a large number of the SG and PB components to understand the status of SGs and PBs in rotavirus-infected cells. Here we demonstrate that rotavirus infection induces molecular triage by selective exclusion of a few proteins of SGs (G3BP1 and ZBP1) and PBs (DDX6, EDC4, and Pan3) and sequestration of the remodeled/atypical cellular organelles, containing the majority of their components, in the VM. The punctate SG and PB structures are seen at about 4 h postinfection (hpi), coinciding with the appearance of small VMs, many of which fuse to form mature large VMs with progression of infection. By use of small interfering RNA (siRNA)-mediated knockdown and/or ectopic overexpression, the majority of the SG and PB components, except for ADAR1, were observed to inhibit viral protein expression and virus growth. In conclusion, this study demonstrates that VMs are highly complex supramolecular structures and that rotavirus employs a novel strategy of sequestration in the VM and harnessing of the remodeled cellular RNA recycling bins to promote its growth.IMPORTANCERotavirus is known to replicate in specialized virus-induced cytoplasmic inclusion bodies called viroplasms (VMs), but the composition and structure of VMs are not yet understood. Here we demonstrate that rotavirus interferes with normal SG and PB assembly but promotes formation of atypical SG-PB structures by selective exclusion of a few components and employs a novel strategy of sequestration of the remodeled SG-PB granules in the VMs to promote virus growth by modulating their negative influence on virus infection. Rotavirus VMs appear to be complex supramolecular structures formed by the union of the triad of viral replication complexes and remodeled SGs and PBs, as well as other host factors, and designed to promote productive virus infection. These observations have implications for the planning of future research with the aim of understanding the structure of the VM, the mechanism of morphogenesis of the virus, and the detailed roles of host proteins in rotavirus biology.

Rotavirus is a major cause of acute gastroenteritis in infants and young children and responsible for approximately 453,000 infantile deaths per year. Rotaviruses are non-enveloped RNA viruses belonging to the Reoviridae family. The rotavirus genome is composed of 11 segments of double-stranded RNA (dsRNA), enclosed in an icosahedral triple-layered protein capsid, and it encodes six structural proteins (VP) and six non-structural proteins (NSPs). Removal of the outer capsid from the triple-layered particle (TLP) during virus entry into the cell activates the synthesis and extrusion of the viral mRNAs from the double-layered particle (DLP) into the cytoplasm. The viral genome replication and assembly of immature DLPs occurs in specialized virus-induced electron-dense cytoplasmic inclusions called viroplasms (VMs), nucleated by two essential non-structural proteins NSP2 and NSP5, and the inner capsid protein VP2. NSP5 is crucial for recruitment of the viroplasmic proteins and the architectural assembly of VMs. VMs are dynamic entities that undergo fusion and localize at the perinuclear region in the infected cells. This study aims to identify the host factors interacting with the VM proteins NSP5 and NSP2, their cytoplasmic relocalization, sequestration in VMs, and the assembly of viral and cellular proteins in the viroplasmic structures. Part I: Identification of the cellular proteins interacting with viroplasmic proteins NSP5 and NSP2 NSP5 and NSP2-interacting proteins have been affinity purified in a pull-down assay and the protein complexes were analysed using LC-MS/MS. Mass spectrometry data revealed the presence of several cellular proteins including hnRNPs, ARE-BPs and others. These results were further validated by both immunoblotting of the pull down complexes, and co-immunoprecipitation. Part II: Cytoplasmic relocalization of nuclear proteins, their sequestration by the viroplasmic proteins and their biological significance in virus infection Rotavirus replication occurs in the cytoplasm, and none of the viral proteins are known to selectively translocate to the nucleus in infected cells. The finding in this study that a large number of hnRNPs and other proteins interact with NSP5 and NSP2 suggested the likely cytoplasmic relocalization of the host nuclear proteins and their interaction with viroplasmic proteins. The cytoplasmic redistribution of some nuclear proteins has been reported in several other viruses such as Poliovirus, HIV, JEV, MHV, and Enteroviruses, but their large-scale relocalization has not been reported. Confocal microscopy studies revealed that several hnRNPs and ARE-BPs relocalized to the cytoplasm and colocalized with VMs in the infected cells to form viroplasm structures (VSs). The basis for this large-scale cytoplasmic relocalization and sequestration of majority of the nuclear proteins and nuclear transport proteins in the viroplasm was explored. The results suggest that selective inhibition of nuclear import pathways occurring during rotavirus infection primarily contributes to the cytoplasmic accumulation of nuclear proteins, but inhibition of the importin α/β pathway, affecting the nuclear accumulation of PABPC1, severely affects rotavirus growth. Knockdown and overexpression studies of some of the relocalized cellular proteins revealed their differential influence on viral infection. Altogether, this study redefines the existing concept that ‘only virus components are present in the VMs’. Part III: Modulation of stress granules (SGs) and processing bodies (PBs) during rotaviral infection In common with many viruses, rotaviruses have been reported to block SG assembly (Montero et al., 2008) and cause dispersion of PBs (Bhowmick et al., 2015), however these results are based on the analysis of only two or three markers of SGs and PBs. Careful examination of these results suggest that in both studies, erroneous conclusions were drawn by the authors despite perfect colocalization of TIA1 and Dcp1a with the viroplasms, probably due to the prevailing concept that VMs consist only of viral components. The present study employing multiple methods, and analysing a large number of SG and PB proteins, unequivocally demonstrated that rotavirus remodels SGs and PBs by inducing selective dissociation of a few components and sequestration of the remodelled granules containing the majority of the SG and PB components into the viroplasms, forming the viroplasm structures (VSs). Part IV: Studies on the structural assembly of viroplasm structures (VSs) VMs are dynamic structures and considered to contain only viral components. In the previous part, it was demonstrated that VMs, consisting of NSP5 and NSP2, associate with other viral viroplasmic proteins and several host proteins to form VSs. Using High-resolution confocal microscopy, the structural organization the viral and cellular proteins in the VS, and the sizes of different VSs inside the infected cells was investigated. These studies revealed that the VSs are more complex than that is currently perceived with viral and cellular proteins being organised in a specific order with the cellular proteins localized in the VS based on their direct or indirect interaction with the viroplasmic proteins. This study provides the first insights into the spatial organization of viral and cellular proteins in the VS. Overall, the present study conclusively demonstrates that the composition of the VS is more complex than that is currently perceived, and provides the first insights into the unknown spatial organization of the viral proteins NSP5, NSP2, VP1 and VP6 as well as cellular proteins within the VS. These results lay the foundation for future studies in understanding the detailed structural organization of different proteins in the VS and the spatial and temporal assembly of viral and cellular proteins.