Academic literature on the topic 'Viceroy Mountbatten'

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Viceroy Mountbatten.'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Journal articles on the topic "Viceroy Mountbatten"

1

Kaul, C. "Shorter notice. Viceroy. Curzon to Mountbatten. H Tinker." English Historical Review 114, no. 456 (April 1999): 509. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/enghis/114.456.509.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Kaul, C. "Shorter notice. Viceroy. Curzon to Mountbatten. H Tinker." English Historical Review 114, no. 456 (April 1, 1999): 509. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ehr/114.456.509.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

GLYNN, IRIAL. "‘An Untouchable in the Presence of Brahmins’ Lord Wavell's Disastrous Relationship with Whitehall During His Time as Viceroy to India, 1943–7." Modern Asian Studies 41, no. 3 (January 11, 2007): 639–63. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0026749x06002460.

Full text
Abstract:
The release of Peter Clarke's biography of Sir Stafford Cripps in 2002, with much of its focus on the protagonist's time in India, meant that a thorough reappraisal of Lord Wavell's time as Viceroy to India was clearly needed. By giving an impartial account of Wavell's relationship with Whitehall during his time as Viceroy this article will also focus on such significant events as the 1945 Simla Conference, the 1946 Cabinet Mission and Wavell's dismissal in late 1946/early 1947. It is hoped that by the end of this article readers will be able to judge Wavell's overall performance as Viceroy and decide for themselves whether he deserved to be replaced by Mountbatten or not.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Yapp, M. E. "South Asia - Hugh Tinker: Viceroy: Curzon to Mountbatten. xii, 266 pp., 12 plates. Karachi, etc.: Oxford University Press, 1997. £11.99." Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies 62, no. 1 (January 1999): 170–71. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0041977x00018073.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Copland, Ian. "The Master and the Maharajas: The Sikh Princes and the East Punjab Massacres of 1947." Modern Asian Studies 36, no. 3 (July 2002): 657–704. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0026749x02003050.

Full text
Abstract:
EventDuring the spring, summer and autumn of 1947 India's richest province, the Punjab, played host to a massive human catastrophe. The trigger for the catastrophe was Britain's parting gift to its Indian subjects of partition. Confronted by a seemingly intractable demand by the All-India Muslim League for a separate Muslim homeland—Pakistan—a campaign which since 1946 had turned increasingly violent, the British government early in 1947 accepted viceroy Lord Mountbatten's advice that partition was necessary to arrest the country's descent into civil war. ‘Mahatma’ Gandhi notably excepted, the leadership of the Congress party came gradually and reluctantly to the same conclusion. Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel, Jawaharlal Nehru's deputy, likened it to the cutting off of a diseased limb. But in accepting the ‘logic’ of the League's ‘two-nation’ theory, the British applied it remorselessly. They insisted that partition would have to follow the lines of religious affiliation, not the boundaries of provinces. In 1947 League president Muhammad Ali Jinnah was forced to accept what he had contemptuously dismissed in 1944 as a ‘moth-eaten’ Pakistan, a Pakistan bereft of something like half of Bengal and the Punjab and most of Assam.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Akram, Ayesha. "Adaptation or Historical Anomaly?: Partition Narratives and Their Visual Counterparts." NUML journal of critical inquiry 18, no. I (June 1, 2020): 12–32. http://dx.doi.org/10.52015/numljci.v18ii.123.

Full text
Abstract:
This research accentuates the presence of multi-layered histories within partition literature and its adaptations as a historiographic mise en abyme— an interpretive multiplicity of historical narratives. The aim is to highlight, probe and eventually determine the significance of addressing multivocality within sensitive historical accounts when told through the aesthetic mediums of fiction and film. In the context of this research, the traditional narrative of the partition of the Subcontinent includes political and nationalistic attitudes on both sides of the divide. The research sets out to explore the extent to which these overreaching accounts and wide-ranging versions of the partition empower the concerned entities to give subjective meanings to their partition experiences. Gurinder Chadha’s film Viceroy’s House (2017), which is partly based on the memoirs of Louis Mountbatten, documented in Freedom at Midnight by Larry Collins and Dominique Lapierre (1976) is taken as the case study, with reference to its source text. The primary trigger of this research is the debate between the Traditionalist and Revisionist school of Historiography, as it seeks to examine the inherent problematic nature of revisionist partition history on text and on screen. This research presents the textual and film narratives of partition as alternative archives, whose authenticity and validity is yet to be established, in comparison with the historical documents/texts. It advocates the necessity to constantly re-evaluate and reinterpret history in the light of new facts; however, all attempts to revise history in the name of aesthetics, without merit and evidence, should be recognized as subjective versions.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

"SELECTED PERSONAL CORRESPONDENCE BETWEEN THE LAST SECRETARY OF STATE FOR INDIA, LORD LISTOWEL, AND THE LAST VICEROY OF INDIA, LORD MOUNTBATTEN, CONCERNING THE END OF BRITISH RULE IN INDIA, APRIL–AUGUST 1947." Camden Fifth Series 57 (May 17, 2019): 225–318. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0960116319000204.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Books on the topic "Viceroy Mountbatten"

1

Tinker, Hugh. Viceroy, Curzon to Mountbatten. Karachi: Oxford University Press, 1997.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Tinker, Hugh. Viceroy: Curzon to Mountbatten. Karachi: Oxford University Press, 1997.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

David, Butler. Lord Mountbatten: The last viceroy. Long Preston: Magna, 1987.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Lord Mountbatten: The last viceroy. London: Methuen, 1985.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Mountbatten: The private story. London: Pan Books in association with Sidgwick & Jackson, 1995.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Hoey, Brian. Mountbatten: The private story. London: Sidgwick & Jackson, 1994.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Ziegler, Philip. Mountbatten. New York: Knopf, 1985.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Ziegler, Philip. Mountbatten: The official biography. London: Phoenix, 2001.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Mountbatten: The official biography. London: Collins, 1985.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Mountbatten. New York: Harper & Row, 1986.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Book chapters on the topic "Viceroy Mountbatten"

1

"From Viceroy to First Sea Lord Mountbatten and India." In Mountbatten, Cold War and Empire, 1945–79. Bloomsbury Academic, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.5040/9781350230286.ch-1.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Searle, Mike. "North-West Frontier: Kohistan, Hindu Kush, Pamirs." In Colliding Continents. Oxford University Press, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199653003.003.0011.

Full text
Abstract:
The Hindu Kush Mountains run along the Afghan border with the North-West Frontier Province of Pakistan. Following the First Anglo-Afghan war of 1839– 42 the British government in Simla decided that the North-West Frontier of British India had to have an accurate delineation. Sir Mortimer Durand mapped the border between what is now Pakistan and Afghanistan in 1893 and this frontier is known as the Durand Line. Unfortunately it is a political frontier and one that splits the Pathan or Pushtun-speaking lands into two, with the North-West Frontier Province and Waziristan in Pakistan to the east and the Afghan provinces of Kunar, Nangahar, Khost, Paktiya, and Kandahar to the west. The border regions north of Baluchistan in Quetta and Waziristan are strong tribal areas and ones that have never come under the direct rule of the Pakistani government. Warlords run their drug and arms businesses from well-fortified mud-walled hilltop fortresses. During the period that Lord Curzon was Viceroy of India from 1899 to 1905 the entire border regions of British India were mapped out along the Karakoram, Kashmir, Ladakh, and south Tibetan Ranges. During Partition, in 1947, once again an artificial border was established separating mostly Muslim Pakistan from India. Lord Mountbatten, the last Viceroy, gave Sir Cyril Radcliffe the invidious task of delineating the border in haste to avoid a civil war that would surely have come, and on 17 August 1947 Pakistan inherited all the territory between the Durand Line and the new Indian frontier, the Radcliffe Line. In the north, the disputed Kashmir region still remained unresolved and the northern boundary of Pakistan ran north to the main watershed along the Hindu Kush, Hindu Raj, and Karakoram Ranges. To the west, Afghanistan was a completely artificial country created by the amalgamation of the Pathans of the east, Hazaras of the central region, the Uzbeks in the Mazar-i-Sharif area, and the Tadjiks of the Panjshir Valley along the border with Pakistan’s North-West Frontier Province. The British lost three wars trying to invade this mountainous land between 1839 and 1919, and the Soviet Union which occupied Afghanistan for ten years from 1979 also withdrew across the Oxus River in failure in February 1989.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

White, John. "Colonialism and the Reshaping of History: Viceroy’s House (Gurinder Chadha, 2017)." In British Cinema and a Divided Nation, 138–54. Edinburgh University Press, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.3366/edinburgh/9781474481021.003.0009.

Full text
Abstract:
This film deals with a crucial episode in determining the contemporary politics of the Indian sub-continent. This is a complex historical subject. In part, the film attempts to address the fraught question of who should bear responsibility for the horrors of Partition. What were the roles of Mountbatten, Gandhi, Nehru and Jinnah in the mayhem that ensued? Chadha has been responsible for perceptive films created around the diasporic experience in the UK (Bhaji on the Beach (1993)/Bend It Like Beckham (2002)): how does this film sit in relation to those earlier films? Inevitably questions are raised regarding not only the authenticity of any single interpretation of history but also who is able to write (and re-write) history.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!

To the bibliography