Academic literature on the topic 'Verdicts Australia'
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Verdicts Australia.'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Journal articles on the topic "Verdicts Australia"
Tidmarsh, Patrick, Gemma Hamilton, and Stefanie J. Sharman. "Changing Police Officers’ Attitudes in Sexual Offense Cases: A 12-Month Follow-Up Study." Criminal Justice and Behavior 47, no. 9 (May 17, 2020): 1176–89. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0093854820921201.
Full textTait, David. "Deliberating about terrorism: Prejudice and jury verdicts in a mock terrorism trial." Australian & New Zealand Journal of Criminology 44, no. 3 (December 2011): 387–403. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0004865811419067.
Full textFinnane, Mark. "‘Irresistible impulse’: historicizing a judicial innovation in Australian insanity jurisprudence." History of Psychiatry 23, no. 4 (November 19, 2012): 454–68. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0957154x12450128.
Full textRae, Ian D. "False Start for the PhD in Australia." Historical Records of Australian Science 14, no. 2 (2002): 129. http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/hr02009.
Full textSu, Jiunn-Yih, Vincent Yaofeng He, Steven Guthridge, and Sven Silburn. "The Impact of Hearing Impairment on the Life Trajectories of Aboriginal Children in Remote Australia: Protocol for the Hearing Loss in Kids Project." JMIR Research Protocols 9, no. 1 (January 15, 2020): e15464. http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/15464.
Full textWarner, Kate, Julia Davis, Caroline Spiranovic, Helen Cockburn, and Arie Freiberg. "Measuring jurors’ views on sentencing: Results from the second Australian jury sentencing study." Punishment & Society 19, no. 2 (August 1, 2016): 180–202. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1462474516660697.
Full textGRAY, ANTHONY. "STANDARD OF PROOF, UNPREDICTABLE BEHAVIOUR AND THE HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIA’S VERDICT ON PREVENTIVE DETENTION LAWS." Deakin Law Review 10, no. 1 (April 1, 2005): 177. http://dx.doi.org/10.21153/dlr2005vol10no1art273.
Full textCooper, James, Ankush Chauhan, and Olivia Puchalski. "Thirsty for a Verdict: Australian Court Confirms That Dehydration Is Not an Accident Under Montreal Convention 1999." Air and Space Law 45, Issue 3 (June 1, 2020): 359–64. http://dx.doi.org/10.54648/aila2020043.
Full textGopalaswamy, Radha, Natarajan Ganesan, Kalamani Velmurugan, Vivekanandhan Aravindhan, and Selvakumar Subbian. "The Strange Case of BCG and COVID-19: The Verdict Is Still up in the Air." Vaccines 8, no. 4 (October 16, 2020): 612. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vaccines8040612.
Full textMorgan, T., P. Jackson, L. McDonald, and J. Holtum. "Chemical ripeners increase early season sugar content in a range of sugarcane varieties." Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 58, no. 3 (2007): 233. http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/ar06018.
Full textBooks on the topic "Verdicts Australia"
First the verdict: The real story of the Building Industry Royal Commission. Annandale, N.S.W: Pluto Press, 2003.
Find full textPeople's Verdict: Adding Informed Citizen Voices to Public Decision-Making. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Incorporated, 2017.
Find full textChwalisz, Claudia. People's Verdict: Adding Informed Citizen Voices to Public Decision-Making. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Incorporated, 2017.
Find full textBook chapters on the topic "Verdicts Australia"
"far, far cry from the broad swathe beaten to the British market by soaps ranging from The Sullivans to Flying Doctors and from Prisoner: Cell Block H to Country Practice which preceded the Neighbours phenomenon there. “The accents” were constantly cited as a crucial point of resistance. KCOP: “People couldn’t understand the Australian accent” (Inouye 1992). WWOR: “We received some complaints about accents, but maybe that’s not the real issue” (Darby 1992). KCOP: “The actors are unknown, and it takes place in a country that few people know about” (Inouye 1992). WWOR: “One problem with anything from out of this country is making the transition from one country to the next. We’re all chauvinists, I guess. We want to see American actors in American stuff” (Leibert 1992). The tenor of these reflections in fact gainsays the New York Daily News’s own report five days prior to Neighbours’s first New York transmission: The program was test-marketed in both cities, and viewers were asked whether they prefer [sic] the original Australian version or the same plots with American actors. “All of them chose the Australian program over the US version,” Pinne said. It won’t hurt, he added, that a program from Australia will be perceived as “a little bit of exotica” without subtitles. (Alexander 1991: 23) The station’s verdict within three months was clearly less sanguine. Australian material did not stay the course, even as exotica. Two additional factors militated against Neighbours’s US success: scheduling, and the length of run required to build up a soap audience. Scheduling was a key factor of the US “mediascape” which contributed to the foundering of Neighbours. Schedule competition tends to squeeze the untried and unknown into the 9–5 time slots. Whatever its British track-record, the Australian soap had no chance of a network sale in the face of the American soaps already locked in mortal combat over the ratings. The best time for Neighbours on US television, between 6:00 p.m. and 7:00 p.m., could be met no better by the independent stations. For the 6:00–8:00 p.m. period, when the networks run news, are the independents’ most competitive time slots, representing their best opportunity to attract viewers away from the networks – principally by rerunning network sitcoms such as The Cosby Show and Cheers. An untried foreign show, Neighbours simply would not, in executives’ views, have pleased advertisers enough; it was too great a risk. Even the 5:00–6:00 p.m. hour, which well suited Neighbours’s youth audience, was denied it in Los Angeles after its first month, with its ratings dropping from 4 per cent to 1 per cent as a consequence. Cristal lamented most the fourth factor contributing to Neighbours’s demise: the stations’ lack of perseverance with it, giving it only three-month runs either side of the States. This is the crucial respect in which public service broadcasting might have benefited it, by probably giving it a longer run. Until the late 1980s, when networks put on a daytime soap, they would." In To Be Continued..., 121. Routledge, 2002. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203131855-23.
Full textConference papers on the topic "Verdicts Australia"
Thomas, Rae, Anna Scott, Rebecca Sims, Louise Craig, Leigh-Anne Claase, Julia Lowe, Clare Heal, Leah Hardiman, and Paul Glasziou. "50 Womens’ verdicts on consequences and labelling of gestational diabetes: a community jury." In Preventing Overdiagnosis Abstracts, December 2019, Sydney, Australia. BMJ Publishing Group Ltd, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjebm-2019-pod.63.
Full text