Journal articles on the topic 'Veblen'

To see the other types of publications on this topic, follow the link: Veblen.

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Consult the top 50 journal articles for your research on the topic 'Veblen.'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Browse journal articles on a wide variety of disciplines and organise your bibliography correctly.

1

Melton, William C. "Thorstein Veblen and the Veblens." Norwegian-American Studies 34, no. 1 (1995): 23–56. http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/nor.1995.a799270.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Merwood-Salisbury, Joanna. "The Architecture of the Leisure Class: Thorstein Veblen and the University of Chicago." Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians 82, no. 1 (March 1, 2023): 7–22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1525/jsah.2023.82.1.7.

Full text
Abstract:
Abstract The American economist Thorstein Veblen’s The Theory of the Leisure Class (1899) has been used to support and define concepts of architectural modernity for more than one hundred years. Best known for introducing the concept of “conspicuous consumption,” this influential book has been especially valuable for historians of the architecture of consumer culture. Yet curiously, Veblen’s own architectural examples have escaped scholarly attention. This article explores the link Veblen drew between Gothic Revival architecture and cultural barbarism. Inverting the concepts and terminology of race science, Veblen used the image of the Gothic Revival university to criticize the rhetoric of American exceptionalism. Seen through the lens of Veblen’s writing, Henry Ives Cobb’s design for the University of Chicago (1891–97), where Veblen taught for fourteen years, represents the transformation of leisure-class aesthetics under the logic of capitalism.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Miranda Cavalcante, Carolina, and Emmanoel De Oliveira Boff. "John Maynard Keynes Between Old and New Institutionalism." Brazilian Keynesian Review 7, no. 1 (December 7, 2021): 14–39. http://dx.doi.org/10.33834/bkr.v7i1.219.

Full text
Abstract:
The article considers the possible compatibility (in epistemological and ontological terms) of the conceptions of convention and institutions in the thought of John Maynard Keynes, Thorstein Veblen and Douglass North. We argue, first, that while Veblen suggests an approach to institutions based on instincts, North sustains an approach to institutions based on rational choice, which implies distinct conceptions about institutions and the social world. We then present Keynes's ontological commitments and the epistemological implications of his ontology. We conclude that there is a background ontological compatibility between Keynes and the late North in that both accept that the socioeconomic world is fundamentally uncertain and non-ergodic; also that Keynes is epistemologically closer to North than Veblen in studying the economy as a market system embedded in social institutions; and finally that Keynes's treatment of individual action is closer to Veblen’s than North’s, in that both Keynes and Veblen see human action as based on instincts and not only on rationality.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Wilson, Matthew C. "Veblen on Interpreting Veblen." Journal of Economic Issues 42, no. 2 (June 2008): 577–82. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00213624.2008.11507168.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Plotkin, Sidney. "Misdirected effort: Thorstein Veblen’s critique of advertising." Journal of Historical Research in Marketing 6, no. 4 (November 11, 2014): 501–22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/jhrm-01-2014-0003.

Full text
Abstract:
Purpose – The purpose of this essay is to argue that, for Veblen, the contribution of advertising to mature business enterprise was crucial. Although Thorstein Veblen’s Theory of the Leisure Class is widely credited with introducing the concept of “conspicuous consumption”, that book is silent on the contribution of the sales effort – or advertising – to such consumption. One must turn to Veblen’s later writings on the business system to find an analysis of advertising within oligopoly capitalism, what Veblen called the system of “absentee ownership”. At the beginning of the twentieth century business faced looming threats of technological progress and democratic discontent. The material prospect of accelerating productivity might soon “end the struggle or lessen the strain” of economic life; democracy might insist that the industrial system serve social needs in efficient ways. To ward off such challenges, business developed a two-prong approach to perpetuate scarcity: carefully managed control of output and an increasingly insistent, rationalized and expensive sales effort. The growth of advertising reflected a systematic expenditure of energy, talent and resources on a misdirection of human effort, one whose chief effect was to prolong “the strain” of everyday life in futile pursuit of waste. Whether such irrationality could be sustained indefinitely, or whether it might finally undermine the society that propels its pursuit, is an issue that Veblen raises, but to which he refuses to give any final answer. Design/methodology/approach – The paper analyzes the full range of Veblen’s theoretical writings on consumption, technology and the sales effort. Findings – The paper insists that Veblen is the first radical political economist to provide a systematic critical analysis of advertising as an essential element of mature capitalism. Originality/value – The paper connects Veblen’s earliest thinking on “conspicuous consumption” to his mature analysis of advertising in the functioning of business enterprise. It will enrich understanding among academics and students, scholars of marketing and economic and social theorists, of Veblen’s critical analysis of the evolution of consumption, production and business enterprise.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Pokusayenko, Andrey. "Also sprach Veblen." Antropologicheskij forum 20, no. 60 (2024): 269–79. http://dx.doi.org/10.31250/1815-8870-2024-20-60-269-279.

Full text
Abstract:
This note deals with the QWERTY effect in Russian scholarly discourse. The case in point is the concept of conspicuous consumption, and how this core term of Thorstein Veblen is translated into Russian in the papers on the sociology of consumption and institutional studies. Russian-language authors tend to speak of “demonstrativnoye potreblenie” (demonstrative consumption), whereas Veblen himself did not use such an expression and avoided employing the adjective “demonstrative” altogether. “Demonstrativnoye potreblenie” as the Russian equivalent for conspicuous consumption got entrenched soon after the release of the translation of Veblen’s The Theory of the Leisure Class: An Economic Study of Institutions in Russian in 1984. We attribute it to the habit of adopting cumbersome anglicisms that might look more like science, for some. This note calls for a rectification of names to clarify the discourse of economists and sociologists.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Nureev, R. "Thorstein Veblen: A View from the 21st Century." Voprosy Ekonomiki, no. 7 (July 20, 2007): 73–85. http://dx.doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2007-7-73-85.

Full text
Abstract:
The article provides a description of T. Veblen’s views, showing his place in the history of economic thought. The author analyzes the context of Veblen’s life and work and considers different aspects of his theoretical legacy. Special attention is paid to the discussion of Veblen’s role in the development of institutional economics. The author describes in detail the main trends in the development of institutionalism after Veblen.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

WISMAN, JON D. "The Darwinian dynamic of sexual selection that Thorstein Veblen missed and its relevance to institutional economics." Journal of Institutional Economics 15, no. 1 (August 2, 2018): 49–72. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s1744137418000255.

Full text
Abstract:
AbstractThorstein Veblen was a pioneer in recognizing the necessity of grounding social science in Darwinian biology and exploring how evolving institutions channel biological proclivities. He especially focused upon how capitalism's social institutions guided the innate need for social status into conspicuous consumption. But why do humans seek status? Surprisingly, Veblen did not pick up on Darwin's concept of sexual selection and recognize it as the driving force behind behavior intended to favorably impress others. This article adds the Darwinian depth that Veblen missed to his understanding of the biologically driven quest for status and its channeling by social institutions. It then explores the turn of most institutionalists away from Veblen's focus on innate behavioral drives in favor of viewing human behavior as more exclusively determined by social conditions. It concludes with reflections on the implications of sexual selection and biological grounding more generally for a theory of institutional economics.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Dimand, Robert W. "Fisher and Veblen: Two Paths for American Economics." Journal of the History of Economic Thought 20, no. 4 (December 1998): 449–65. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s1053837200002467.

Full text
Abstract:
In the early years of the twentieth century, two outspoken and brilliant American economists, Thorstein Veblen and Irving Fisher, offered sharply-contrasting visions of how the discipline of economics should be transformed. Each taught at a leading university and had added prominence as a journal editor, but pursued economic inquiry in ways alien to senior colleagues at his university and in the profession at large. Despite the gulf separating their approaches to economics, they had been doctoral students of the same mentor, William Graham Sumner of Yale, and had each been deeply influenced by Sumner. This paper uses the exchange on neoclassical capital theory between Veblen and Fisher in the Political Science Quarterly in 1908 and 1909 to illuminate their approaches to economics and to question why the American economics profession came to follow Fisher's path–even though Veblen, unlike Fisher, attracted devoted disciples and was considered in American social thought (excepting academic economists) as the standard-bearer of “the New Economics.” Despite Veblen's antipathy to those aspects of Fisher's work that became dominant in mainstream economics, there was a close affinity between Veblen's Theory of Business Enterprise (1904) and Fisher's debt-deflation theory of depressions, which remained (until very recently) outside the mainstream and has been taken up by such heterodox economists as Hyman Minsky.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Vernikov, Andrei V., and Anna A. Kurysheva. "How Russian Scholars Perceive and Employ the Veblenian Dichotomy." Journal of Institutional Studies 16, no. 2 (June 25, 2024): 006–19. http://dx.doi.org/10.17835/2076-6297.2024.16.2.006-019.

Full text
Abstract:
We survey Russian-language research papers which refer to Thorstein Veblen’s Evolutionary Theory (VET) and, more specifically, the so-called Veblenian dichotomy. This latter consists of analytical categories describing two types of behavioral patterns, namely «productive» and «unproductive» proclivities, and how they affect the direction of the given society’s cultural and economic evolution. Our focus is on how Russian scholars perceived the Veblenian dichotomy and employed this theoretical concept in empirical studies. We build a sample of 48 research papers from the Russian eLIBRARY.RU database, Google Scholar and Google Books. Our claim is that some misunderstandings and misinterpretations of Veblen’s theoretical concept may have distorted its original meaning and thrust. Such perceptions may have, in turn, created a bias in the interpretation of empirical results, when references to Veblen underpin statements which Veblen would not have made. For instance, institutions are positioned as opposed to technology, fully in line with the thinking of Clarence Ayres. National traditions and values are regarded an impediment to progress and innovation. Some authors view «modernization» of the economy and values as a need, regardless of socio-economic effects, whereas they condemn institutional inertia. Russian academic discourse ignores the category of instinct which was essential for Veblen. A biased application of theoretical ideas to empirical material may have contributed to the initial misunderstanding. A value or a social practice which Veblenian ethics view through a negative prism are now treated as instrumental, and vice versa. Misinterpretations of Veblen may have arisen from inaccurate reading and citing of the original or from reliance on writings by other authors. Another source of bias consists in the ideology-driven negative assessment of traditional economic culture, which have prevailed in the Russian expert discourse over the past decades.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
11

Tilman, Rick. "John Dewey as User and Critic of Thorstein Veblen's Ideas." Journal of the History of Economic Thought 20, no. 2 (June 1998): 145–60. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s1053837200001826.

Full text
Abstract:
John Dewey (1859-1952) is easily the most influential philosopher America has produced and Thorstein Veblen (1857-1929) is arguably the most influential American heterodox economist. Although scholars have often pondered both their intellectual and personal relationship, until recently no firm conclusions could accurately be drawn. Due to the lack of correspondence between the two men and the brevity of Veblen's comments on and citations of Dewey, it is difficult to know what the former thought of the latter both in terms of personality and economic ideas. But, fortunately, Dewey cited Veblen and commented on his economic thought on many occasions so it is possible to at least partly reconstruct one-half of the relationship. This reconstruction will be the focus of this article, emphasizing: (1) their biographical intersections and convergences; (2) Dewey's ideas about economics and the economy; (3) Dewey's explicit use of Veblen's economic ideas in his own published work; and (4) Dewey's critical comments in his correspondence regarding Veblen's interpretation of pragmatism and his development as a social theorist.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
12

Brick, Howard, and Rick Tilman. "Veblen Defended." Reviews in American History 22, no. 1 (March 1994): 125. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2703358.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
13

Hughey, Michael W. "Veblen anthologized." International Journal of Politics, Culture and Society 7, no. 4 (June 1994): 669–71. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/bf02145507.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
14

Mitchell, Ross E. "Thorstein Veblen." Organization & Environment 14, no. 4 (December 2001): 389–408. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1086026601144001.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
15

Martins, Nuno Ornelas. "Reconsidering the notions of process, order and stability in Veblen." Cambridge Journal of Economics 44, no. 5 (March 3, 2020): 1115–35. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cje/beaa005.

Full text
Abstract:
Abstract Tony Lawson has recently provided an original assessment of the notions of process, order and stability in the writings of Thorstein Veblen, in which he attributes to Veblen an ideational conception of order, while also arguing that Veblen changed his views on the causes of stability, which in earlier writings were attributed to institutions and the ceremonial aspects of life, and in later writings are to be found in human nature. In so doing, Lawson moves away from previous interpretations of Veblen, including Lawson’s own in some respects, especially on the nature of institutions. Here I further extend Lawson’s new interpretation of Veblen in some respects, while challenging some aspects of it. In particular, I discuss whether Veblen really changed his view on the causes of stability, while proposing a generalisation of the Veblenian dichotomy.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
16

Dillard, Jesse F., and Linda V. Ruchala. "VEBLEN'S PLACEBO: ANOTHER HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE ON ADMINISTRATIVE EVIL." Accounting Historians Journal 38, no. 1 (June 1, 2011): 1–29. http://dx.doi.org/10.2308/0148-4184.38.1.1.

Full text
Abstract:
Thorstein Veblen was a turn of the 20th century American economist concerned with the implications of financial capitalists directing the means of production. Veblen proposed that the rationality of “material science” as practiced by the “production engineers” is fundamentally different from the rationality of market capitalism. If this claim is valid, our previous contentions regarding accounting, as a facilitating technology, for administrative evil warrant reconsideration. Veblen's position provides a historical perspective on one dimension of administrative evil that is generally unquestionably accepted, especially within accounting. That is, technology, such as accounting and the related information systems, is amoral, and it is only through ideologically instigated applications that any moral value accrues. We discuss administrative evil and the role of instrumental rationality generally, and accounting specifically, in creating it. Veblen's characterization of financial capitalism and production engineers and his arguments for the primacy of economic efficiency versus “pecuniary gain” provide a basis for evaluating the legitimating action. We consider how Veblen's work relates to notions of instrumental rationality and then undertake a critical assessment of the ideas. Some of Veblen's ideas, while utopian, might be seen as an elixir for the detrimental influences of financial capital; however, at best, they provide a placebo for the ills of administrative evil and, as such, do not provide an amoral basis for legitimating the associated accounting systems.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
17

Dawson, Hugh J. "Veblen's Social Satire and Amos Alonzo Stagg: Football and the American Way of Life." Prospects 14 (October 1989): 273–89. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0361233300005767.

Full text
Abstract:
Since the appearance of The Theory of the Leisure Class, Thorstein Veblen's unhappy experience at the University of Chicago has been recognized as the precipitant of its criticism of American academic life. The endeavors of John D. Rockefeller, the University's founder; William Rainey Harper, its first president; and benefactors like Charles Tyson Yerkes exemplified what Veblen denounced as “the conduct of universities by business men.” Almost two decades intervened between The Leisure Class and the fuller indictment of The Higher Learning in America, which drew also upon Veblen's disappointments at Stanford, where he taught after his dismissal from Chicago. The later book developed a manuscript critique of higher education that Veblen had written in 1904. Although he professed to feel bound “under the rule of Nihil nisi bonum” to observe a “large reticence” in speaking of the University's president, his 1916 preface mocked Harper as the “Great Pioneer in reshaping American academic policy.” The book's criticisms “necessarily drew largely on first-hand observation of the conduct of affairs at Chicago” and were largely directed at the zeal for moral regeneration that Harper would have had suffuse his campus.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
18

THRONTVEIT, TRYGVE. "THE WILL TO BEHOLD: THORSTEIN VEBLEN'S PRAGMATIC AESTHETICS." Modern Intellectual History 5, no. 3 (November 2008): 519–46. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s1479244308001789.

Full text
Abstract:
No philistine, Thorstein Veblen thought humankind's innate impulse to imbue experience with aesthetic unity advanced all knowledge, and that the most beautiful objects, ideas, and actions met a standard of communal benefit reflecting humanity's naturally selected sociability. Though German idealism was an early influence, it clashed with Veblen's historicist critique of Western institutions, and it was William James's psychology that refined his ideas into a coherent aesthetics with ethical and political applications, by clarifying how instinct, habit, and environment could interact to institutionalize standards of beauty subverting the native altruism of the aesthetic impulse. Over years of association with John Dewey, Veblen concluded that a redeemed and reflective will to behold and create beauty in and through selfless activity could advance a more efficient and egalitarian society, and that humans cooperatively shaping their environments for the common good could approximate the German tradition's ideal of harmonizing personal freedom and external reality.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
19

Böck, Ricardo, and Felipe Almeida. "Clarence Ayres, Ayresianos e a evolução do institucionalismo Vebleniano." Economia e Sociedade 27, no. 2 (August 2018): 381–407. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1982-3533.2017v27n2art1.

Full text
Abstract:
Resumo O objetivo deste artigo é analisar a evolução do Institucionalismo de Thorstein Veblen por Clarence Ayres e o Cactus Branch. Veblen é um dos fundadores da Economia Institucional Original. Apesar da sua grande contribuição à Economia Institucional, a carreira acadêmica de Veblen foi errática. Ele não se estabeleceu em nenhuma universidade e não formou nenhum PhD. Consequentemente, veblenianos tiveram pouco ou nenhum contato com Veblen. Dentre eles, Clarence Ayres é, certamente, um dos mais importantes. Diferentemente de Veblen, Ayres se estabeleceu na University of Texas, em Austin, e apresentou a tradição vebleniana para vários estudantes. O grupo institucionalista ayresiano ficou conhecido como Cactus Branch; no entanto, a perspectiva de Ayres sobre o Institucionalismo vebleniano é bem particular: o Institucionalismo ayresiano tem seu foco na dicotomia instrumental-cerimonial das instituições. A década de 1980 testemunhou uma redescoberta do Institucionalismo vebleniano. Institucionalistas do Cactus Branch desenvolveram uma versão do Institucionalismo ayresiano com mais ênfase em elementos veblenianos. Um segmento do Cactus Branch autodenominado Institucionalismo Radical recuperou a crítica social de Veblen em seus estudos.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
20

Soylu, Fatma Esra. "VEBLEN: PIONEER OF OPEN ECONOMIC REALITY." Ekonomska misao i praksa 31, no. 2 (December 2022): 603–21. http://dx.doi.org/10.17818/emip/2022/2.12.

Full text
Abstract:
In this study, it is argued that the main failure of mainstream economics is its inability to establish a social ontology and Thorstein Veblen, the founder of the Institutional Economics school, has an important role in establishing this social ontology. Considering the social and economic reality as a closed system, which mainstream economics presupposes in the analysis, is the main reason behind its failure to produce solutions to real world problems. The necessity of an open system ontology is a common issue for heterodox schools of economics that opposes the mainstream. It will be argued that Veblen’s analysis has the ideas that form the basis of this concept. First, the basic elements of the open system approach will be discussed. Then, it will be argued that the elements of the evolutionist approach, the relationship between structure-agent, the rejection of positivism and the cumulative causality in Veblen’s analysis are consistent with the open system approach.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
21

Trifu, Alexandru. "Consumption, Veblen and Teleology." Moldavian Journal for Education and Social Psychology 6, no. 1 (January 10, 2023): 45–53. http://dx.doi.org/10.18662/mjesp/6.1/38.

Full text
Abstract:
In fact, this paper is following to present the work of Thorstein Bunde Veblen unifying the two other terms, as an early brick to the economic theory, influencing the becoming of the economic theory and practice. Starting from Veblen’s key idea and special approach of teleology, in economics particularly, we’ve chosen as example of a final and determined thing/aspect the act of consumption. That is in the Veblenian sense, of conspicuous consumption, and the consumption as general human and economic activity. Using synthesis of all theoretical and practical sources, the result of the paper is that one of consumption, even luxury, which takes into account the constraints of nowadays phenomena and activities around the world. Furthermore, the economic theory must be tacticized, based exactly on these challenges and influences both from interior of economic and social systems and from the external environment.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
22

Takay, Bahar, and Güler Aydın. "What if Marx and Veblen met…" Ekonomski anali 59, no. 202 (2014): 131–56. http://dx.doi.org/10.2298/eka1402131t.

Full text
Abstract:
The aim of this study is to analyse both the differences and the similarities between Marx and Veblen regarding historical specificity, evolution, and alienation. Starting with their discussions on these subjects, this article builds on the analyses of capitalism. The goal of this study is not to collapse Marx and Veblen into one another but rather to understand capitalism by presenting the complementary relationship of the two economists? analyses and to introduce an appropriate analytical framework for understanding capitalism. This study consists of three parts. The first part examines how Veblen regarded Marx?s analysis, and how Marx especially viewed Darwin?s theory of evolution. Marx?s approach to evolution and Veblen?s criticism of Marx on this topic will constitute the general framework of this part. The second part of the study evaluates the level of agreement or disagreement between Veblen and Marx on the idea of historicism from the perspective of dialectical materialism. The last part analyses Marx and Veblen?s different ideas of the concept of alienation. The two economists? views on the capitalist system will be determined based on these three concepts, introducing the similarities between them as well as the differences.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
23

Kehoe, Elaine. "2013 Veblen Prize." Notices of the American Mathematical Society 60, no. 04 (April 1, 2013): 1. http://dx.doi.org/10.1090/noti973.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
24

Wellington, Donald C., and Sourushe Zandvakili. "The Veblen reply." International Journal of Social Economics 33, no. 12 (December 2006): 858–59. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/03068290610714689.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
25

Hodgson, Geoffrey M. "Veblen and darwinism." International Review of Sociology / Revue Internationale de Sociologie 14, no. 3 (November 1, 2004): 343–61. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0390670042000318241.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
26

Eby, Clare. "Boundaries Lost: Thorstein Veblen, The Higher Learning in America, and the Conspicuous Spouse." Prospects 26 (October 2001): 251–93. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0361233300000946.

Full text
Abstract:
The Central concern of Thorstein Veblen's The Higher Learning in America (1918), a book that anyone concerned with the bureaucratization of the university or recent assaults on tenure would do well to scrutinize, is the scandalous porousness of boundaries between academia and business. According to Veblen, research universities contaminated themselves at the time of their formation in the late 19th century, not simply by accepting funding from capitalists, but also by mimicking the administrative structure and adopting the values of commercial culture. Although he believes the interests of education and business are “wholly divergent,” Veblen finds that “Plato's classic scheme of folly, which would have the philosophers take over the management of affairs, has been turned on its head; the men of affairs have taken over the direction of the pursuit of knowledge.” While some of the local concerns of Higher Learning differ from problems facing the university today, current interest in what Andrew Ross calls the “corporatization of the modern university” makes the book's broad claims strikingly relevant.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
27

Jannah, Nurul, and Rakhmadsyah Putra Rangkuty. "Remaja dan Warung Kopi pada Masa Pandemi Covid-19 (Studi Kasus di Gampong Meunasah Cut Kecamatan Nisam Kabupaten Aceh Utara)." Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik Malikussaleh (JSPM) 3, no. 1 (June 4, 2022): 119. http://dx.doi.org/10.29103/jspm.v3i1.3656.

Full text
Abstract:
This research is entitled Youth and Coffee Shops during the Covid 19 Pandemic (Case Study in Gampong Meunasah Cut, Nisam District, North Aceh Regency). This study focuses on the causes of teenagers in Gampong Meunasah Cut to choose to gather in coffee shops during the Covid 19 pandemic and the impact of coffee shops on adolescents during the Covid 19 pandemic. This study uses Veblen's perspective of social change theory. Veblen sees technology as coloring the social system. Therefore, put forward the proposition that human behavior reflects technological and economic development. Veblen's statement implicitly requires the ability of technology to influence human behavior. If so, then the technology carries certain values and therefore is not value free in social life. The research method used in this research is a qualitative method using a descriptive approach. The results of this study indicate that the reason why teenagers in Gampong Meunasah Cut chose to gather at a coffee shop during the Covid 19 pandemic were (a) available free wifi internet network, (b) participating in online learning, and (c) adequate facilities. The impact of coffee shops on adolescents during the Covid 19 pandemic in Gampong Meunasah Cut is (a) it has an impact on education, (b) can control youth interactions, and (c) builds patterns of social interaction between teenagers and the community.Penelitian ini berjudul Remaja Dan Warung Kopi Pada Masa Pandemi Covid 19 (Studi Kasus di Gampong Meunasah Cut Kecamatan Nisam Kabupaten Aceh Utara). Penelitian ini mengfokuskan pada penyebab remaja di Gampong Meunasah Cut memilih berkumpul di warung kopi pada masa pandemi covid 19 dan dampak warung kopi terhadap remaja pada masa pandemi covid 19. Penelitian ini menggunakan teori perubahan sosial perspektif Veblen. Veblen melihat teknologi mewarnai tatanan sistem sosial. Karena itu, mengajukan preposisi bahwa perilaku manusia mencerminkan perkembangan teknologi dan ekonominya. Statement Veblen ini secara implisit mengsyaratkan kemampuan teknologi dalam mempengaruhi perilaku manusia. Jika demikian, maka teknologi itu membawa nilai-nilai tertentu dan karenanya tidak bebas nilai dalam kehidupan sosial. Metode penelitian yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini yaitu metode kualitatif dengan menggunakan pendekatan deskriptif. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa penyebab remaja di Gampong Meunasah Cut memilih berkumpul di warung kopi pada masa pandemi covid 19 adalah (a) tersedia jaringan internet wifi gratis, (b) mengikuti belajar daring, dan (c) tersedia fasilitas memadai. Dampak warung kopi terhadap remaja pada masa pandemi covid 19 di Gampong Meunasah Cut adalah (a) berdampak terhadap pendidikan, (b) dapat mengontrol pergaulan remaja, dan (c) membangun pola interaksi sosial antara sesama remaja dan masyarakat.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
28

Almeida, Felipe, and Luís Gustavo de Paula. "A Bibliometrical Analysis of Thorstein Veblen's writings and ideas." Estudos Econômicos (São Paulo) 53, no. 1 (March 2023): 147–76. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1980-53575315falg.

Full text
Abstract:
Abstract Thorstein Veblen’s work was a cornerstone in American economics during the late 19th and early 20th century. Veblen is usually characterized as a founding father of American Institutionalism, which competed with Neoclassical Economics in the mainstreaming process of American economics during the first half of the 20th century. Given the huge Veblen’s writings impact on economics, it is possible to find mainstream economics papers that mention Veblen’s contribution – hence, they would be not an exclusivity of the heterodox approach. The goal of our study is to investigate how papers published by heterodox and mainstream journals deal with Veblen’s writings. Our investigation is based on a bibliometric analysis to identify Veblen’s economics ideas as referenced in papers published by top heterodox and mainstream journals. Bibliometry is also applied in our paper to build indicators and analyze patterns.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
29

Devy C Yudihutomo. "Institutional Approach in Economics and Institutional Economic Thinking." Demagogi: Journal of Social Sciences, Economics and Education 2, no. 2 (May 19, 2024): 81–88. http://dx.doi.org/10.61166/demagogi.v2i2.19.

Full text
Abstract:
Aspects of economic methodology contained in Institutional economics are often incorporated into orthodox economics. Orthodox economics means economic thoughts that use and continue classical economic views, such as free competition, perfect competition, consumer satisfaction. The person who was most influential and had a dominant role in the existence of the Institutional school was Thorstein Bunde Veblen. He criticized Classical and Neo-classical economic theories which ignored non-economic aspects such as institutions and the environment. In fact, Veblen considered that the influence of circumstances and the environment was very large on people's economic behavior. Unsupportive political and social structures can cause distortions in economic processes. For Veblen, society is an evolutionary phenomenon, everything is constantly changing. A person's behavioral patterns in society are adapted to current social conditions. If the behavior is suitable and accepted, then the behavior will continue. On the other hand, if a behavior is deemed unsuitable, the behavior will be adapted to the environment. These circumstances and environments are what Veblen called "institutions". In this case, it is explained that what Veblen means by institutions are things related to norms, values, habits and culture. Furthermore, everything is reflected in economic activities, both in production and consumption.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
30

Cavalcante, Carolina Miranda. "COMMONS E VEBLEN: DA EXISTÊNCIA DE UMA UNIDADE CONCEITUAL NO ÂMBITO DO INSTITUCIONALISMO AMERICANO." Revista Ciências Sociais em Perspectiva 18, no. 34 (January 1, 2019): 56–72. http://dx.doi.org/10.48075/revistacsp.v18i34.17339.

Full text
Abstract:
Esse artigo tem por objeto o institucionalismo americano, que ocupou um lugar de destaque na Academia norte-americana no período compreendido entre as duas grandes guerras mundiais. O objetivo desse trabalho é a análise das propostas institucionalistas de John Commons e de Thorstein Veblen, no intuito de se compreender em que medida é possível verificar uma convergência conceitual e de propósitos entre esses autores, que são considerados como dois dos fundadores do institucionalismo americano. Ao lado de Walton Hamilton, que teria cunhado o termo “economia institucional” em 1919, encontramos na origem do institucionalismo americano o trabalho seminal de Thorstein Veblen, que teria influenciado o pensamento de Wesley Mitchell e de John Commons, dentre outros. Nesse artigo analisaremos a natureza da crítica de Commons e Veblen à economia ortodoxa da época, bem como a concepção de instituição dos autores. Intencionamos, deste modo, identificar os pontos de convergência e de divergência entre as propostas institucionalistas de Commons e de Veblen.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
31

Cavalieri, Marco Antonio Ribas. "Thorstein Veblen entre seus pares economistas: um estudo sobre a audiência e a estrutura argumentativa de sua crítica sistemática ao pensamento econômico." Nova Economia 25, no. 1 (April 2015): 11–34. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0103-6351/1746.

Full text
Abstract:
<p>Este artigo pretende contribuir com a tendência revisionista da biografia intelectual de Thorstein Veblen. Especificamente, almejamos estudar o lugar de Veblen entre os economistas de seu tempo nos Estados Unidos. Para tanto, analisamos a audiência, o contexto e a estrutura da argumentação que o fundador do institucionalismo usou em uma série de textos publicados entre 1898 e 1909. A essa série demos o nome de "crítica sistemática do pensamento econômico". Identificamos que Veblen estruturou seu argumento com a explícita intenção de costurar um acordo com sua audiência de economistas, utilizando para tal o expediente retórico de "reinvenção da tradição".</p>
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
32

Underwood, Daniel A. "Veblen in Plain English: A Complete Introduction to Thorstein Veblen’s Economics." Journal of Economic Issues 41, no. 1 (March 2007): 294–95. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00213624.2007.11507010.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
33

Scott, David. "What Would Veblen Say?" Leisure Sciences 32, no. 3 (April 30, 2010): 288–94. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01490401003712713.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
34

Dunlap, Rudy. "What Would Veblen Wear?" Leisure Sciences 32, no. 3 (April 30, 2010): 295–97. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01490401003712747.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
35

Heilbroner, Robert L., and Charles M. A. Clark. "The Veblen-Commons Award." Journal of Economic Issues 28, no. 2 (June 1994): 321–23. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00213624.1994.11505548.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
36

Melman, Seymour, and Jerry L. Petr. "The Veblen-Commons Award." Journal of Economic Issues 31, no. 2 (June 1997): 307–9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00213624.1997.11505919.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
37

Knoedler, Janet T. "Veblen and Technical Efficiency." Journal of Economic Issues 31, no. 4 (December 1997): 1011–26. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00213624.1997.11505989.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
38

Sweezy, Paul M. "The Veblen-Commons Award." Journal of Economic Issues 33, no. 2 (June 1999): 219–21. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00213624.1999.11506152.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
39

Maynard, Tony. "Thorstein Veblen: Victorian Firebrand." Journal of Economic Issues 33, no. 4 (December 1999): 1037–39. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00213624.1999.11506233.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
40

Hodgson, Geoffrey M. "How Veblen Generalized Darwinism." Journal of Economic Issues 42, no. 2 (June 2008): 399–405. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00213624.2008.11507148.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
41

Kalantaridis, Christos. "Veblen and the entrepreneur." International Review of Sociology / Revue Internationale de Sociologie 14, no. 3 (November 1, 2004): 487–501. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0390670042000318331.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
42

Rutherford, Malcolm. "Veblen, Leibenstein and McCormick." History of Economics Society Bulletin 8, no. 2 (1987): 57–59. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s1042771600001332.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
43

Plotkin, Sidney. "Veblen, Europe and Utopia." History of European Ideas 40, no. 2 (June 19, 2013): 245–58. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01916599.2013.805045.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
44

Gordon, Wendell, and David Hamilton. "The Veblen-Commons Award." Journal of Economic Issues 19, no. 2 (June 1985): 301–4. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00213624.1985.11504371.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
45

Klein, Philip A. "The Veblen-Commons Award." Journal of Economic Issues 25, no. 2 (June 1991): 299–301. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00213624.1991.11505164.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
46

Scott, William B. "Thorstein Veblen: Victorian firebrand." Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences 37, no. 1 (2001): 71–73. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/1520-6696(200124)37:1<71::aid-jhbs10>3.0.co;2-#.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
47

Pickert, G�nter. "Pasch- oder Veblen-Axiom?" Geometriae Dedicata 50, no. 1 (March 1994): 81–86. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/bf01263653.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
48

Hodgson, Geoffrey M. "Thorstein Veblen and Socialism." Journal of Economic Issues 57, no. 4 (October 2, 2023): 1162–77. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00213624.2023.2273138.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
49

M. Firmansyah. "Mengenal Pemikiran Old Institutional Economics (OIE) Dalam Ilmu Ekonomi Kelembagaan." Journal of Economics and Business 6, no. 1 (March 25, 2020): 37–46. http://dx.doi.org/10.29303/ekonobis.v6i1.39.

Full text
Abstract:
Artikel ini menjelaskan beberapa bentuk pemikiran Ekonomi Kelembagaan Lama. Metode yang digunakan dalam artikel ini adalah penelitian kepustakaan. Ada beberapa temuan artikel ini: 1). Gagasan Ekonomi Kelembagaan lama secara umum menolak pemikiran klasik yang mengabaikan faktor-faktor kelembagaan berupa nilai-nilai, budaya dan rule of life dalam ilmu ekonomi. 2). Peletak dasar pemikiran ekonomi kelembagaan adalah guru dan murid, di mana Thorstain B Veblen merupakan god father dari ilmu ekonomi kelembagaan. 3). Veblen mengedepankan evolusi pemikiran yang berdasar pada kondisi lingkungan sosial tempat individu hidup. 4). Pemikiran Murid-murid Veblen, yaitu Commons menitikberatkan pada multidisiplin ilmu dalam mejelaskan ilmu ekonomi, Mitchell menitikberarkan pada karakter perilaku berdasar kelembagaan lokal dan Ayres menitikberatkan pada perubahan kelembagaan.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
50

M. Firmansyah. "Mengenal Pemikiran Old Institutional Economics (OIE) Dalam Ilmu Ekonomi Kelembagaan." Journal of Economics and Business 6, no. 1 (March 31, 2020): 37–46. http://dx.doi.org/10.29303/ekonobis.v6i1.50.

Full text
Abstract:
Artikel ini menjelaskan beberapa bentuk pemikiran Ekonomi Kelembagaan Lama. Metode yang digunakan dalam artikel ini adalah penelitian kepustakaan. Ada beberapa temuan artikel ini: 1). Gagasan Ekonomi Kelembagaan lama secara umum menolak pemikiran klasik yang mengabaikan faktor-faktor kelembagaan berupa nilai-nilai, budaya dan rule of life dalam ilmu ekonomi. 2). Peletak dasar pemikiran ekonomi kelembagaan adalah guru dan murid, di mana Thorstain B Veblen merupakan god father dari ilmu ekonomi kelembagaan. 3). Veblen mengedepankan evolusi pemikiran yang berdasar pada kondisi lingkungan sosial tempat individu hidup. 4). Pemikiran Murid-murid Veblen, yaitu Commons menitikberatkan pada multidisiplin ilmu dalam mejelaskan ilmu ekonomi, Mitchell menitikberarkan pada karakter perilaku berdasar kelembagaan lokal dan Ayres menitikberatkan pada perubahan kelembagaan.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!

To the bibliography