Academic literature on the topic 'Validity'
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Validity.'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Journal articles on the topic "Validity"
Gavora, P. "Validita a reliabilita výskumných nástrojov: princípy a reálna prax." Pedagogická orientace 23, no. 4 (September 16, 2013): 511–34. http://dx.doi.org/10.5817/pedor2013-4-511.
Full textKihlstrom, John F. "Ecological Validity and “Ecological Validity”." Perspectives on Psychological Science 16, no. 2 (February 16, 2021): 466–71. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1745691620966791.
Full textAlgina, James, and H. J. Keselman. "Population Validity and Cross-Validity." Educational and Psychological Measurement 68, no. 2 (June 22, 2007): 233–44. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0013164407305589.
Full textLocke, Edwin A. "Construct validity vs. concept validity." Human Resource Management Review 22, no. 2 (June 2012): 146–48. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2011.11.008.
Full textMenold, Natalja, Matthias Bluemke, and Anita M. Hubley. "Validity." Methodology 14, no. 4 (October 1, 2018): 143–45. http://dx.doi.org/10.1027/1614-2241/a000159.
Full textSweeting, Trevor J., Malay Ghosh, Rahul Mukerjee, and Gauri Sankar Datta. "validity." Annals of Statistics 28, no. 5 (October 2000): 1414–26. http://dx.doi.org/10.1214/aos/1015957400.
Full textRosen, Chelsie L., Brianna M. Dunn, Christopher D. Walker, Ryan M. Downs, Brian A. Jones, Guy W. Danhoff, Robert T. Davidson, and Jessica Stapleton. "Validity." Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise 47 (May 2015): 237. http://dx.doi.org/10.1249/01.mss.0000477071.37233.5b.
Full textMessick, Samuel. "VALIDITY." ETS Research Report Series 1987, no. 2 (December 1987): i—208. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/j.2330-8516.1987.tb00244.x.
Full textLippa, S. M., N. J. Pastorek, J. Romesser, J. Linck, A. H. Sim, N. M. Wisdom, and B. I. Miller. "Ecological Validity of Performance Validity Testing." Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology 29, no. 3 (March 28, 2014): 236–44. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/arclin/acu002.
Full textMuchinsky, Paul M., and Justin M. Raines. "The overgeneralized validity of validity generalization." Journal of Organizational Behavior 34, no. 7 (August 8, 2013): 1057–60. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/job.1892.
Full textDissertations / Theses on the topic "Validity"
Morris, David Charles. "Comparing job component validity to observed validity across jobs." CSUSB ScholarWorks, 2002. https://scholarworks.lib.csusb.edu/etd-project/2046.
Full textJames, Megan. "The validity endeavour." Thesis, Stellenbosch : University of Stellenbosch, 2010. http://hdl.handle.net/10019.1/4162.
Full textENGLISH ABSTRACT: Qualitative and quantitative research implies different meta-theoretical approaches to knowledge production. The former maintains a constructivist and interpretative perspective, as opposed to the latter, which exists within a realist and even positivist paradigm. Within the field of research methodology, the dominant conceptualisation of validity is based on a positivist discourse, which suggests that (social) scientific research should strive to attain an ultimate truth. This understanding of validity is difficult to achieve within a research paradigm that values the idiosyncratic world views of the participants under investigation. The introduction of CAQDAS (Computer Assisted Qualitative Data Analysis Software), however, brought with it the hope that its application would confer upon qualitative research the rigour associated with validity in a mainly positivist interpretation of the research process. The ultimate goal of this thesis is to determine whether CAQDAS can make a significant contribution to efforts aimed at validating qualitative research. The research design employed in the present study is that of a descriptive content analysis, focussing on scientific articles that not only report qualitative studies, but also make explicit reference to the use of CAQDAS, and describe validation techniques applied during the research process. Purposive sampling was applied to select 108 articles, published from 1996 to 2009, that meet the sampling criteria and that were identified through online searches of various bibliographic databases and search engines. The study investigates three predominant research questions concerned with the following: (1) the most commonly used software programmes; (2) trends in CAQDAS use over time; as well as (3) the validation techniques reported in examined scientific articles, distinguishing between techniques that are performed with and without the use of CAQDAS. With regard to the first two research questions, it was found that the three most commonly used software programmes are QSR N programmes (including NUD.IST, NVivo, N4, N5 and N6), followed by Atlas.ti and MAXqda (including the earlier version winMAX), and that there has been a general increase over iv the past 13 years (1996-2009) in the number of qualitative research articles reporting CAQDAS use. The exploration of validation techniques utilised in qualitative research, as reported in the examined scientific articles, demonstrated that the techniques are in most cases performed manually. Although CAQDAS offers many benefits, the predominant validation techniques reported can be, and still are, performed without CAQDAS. Techniques that would have been impossible without CAQDAS are based on the data display features of CAQDAS, as well as on the accuracy and consistency offered by CAQDAS in the execution of certain actions. The findings generated by this study seem to support the hypothesis that CAQDAS per se does not enhance validity, since it is predominantly utilised as merely a research tool.
AFRIKAANSE OPSOMMING: Kwalitatiewe en kwantitatiewe navorsing is gegrond op verskillende meta-teoretiese benaderings tot die lewering van inligting. Eersgenoemde handhaaf ‘n konstruktivistiese en interpretatiewe perspektief, teenoor laasgenoemde, wat binne ‘n paradigma bestaan wat gegrond is op realisme en positivisme. Binne die veld van navorsingsmetodologie, is die oorwegende konseptualisering van geldigheid, gebaseer op ‘n positivistiese diskoers, wat voorstel dat (sosiale) wetenskaplike navorsing daarna moet streef om ‘n absolute waarheid te bereik. Hierdie begrip van geldigheid word moeilik verwesenlik binne ‘n navorsingsparadigma wat waarde heg aan die ideosinkratiese wêreldbeskouinge van die navorsingsdeelnemers. CAQDAS (Computer Assisted Qualitative Data Analysis Software), is bekend gestel met die hoop dat die gebruik daarvan kwalitatiewe navorsing sal verleen met stiptheid wat met geldigheid geassosieer word, oorwegend binne ‘n positivistiese interpretasie van die navorsingsproses. Die oorkoepelende doelwit van hierdie tesis is om vas te stel of CAQDAS enige betekenisvolle bydrae kan maak tot pogings om die geldigheid van kwalitatiewe navorsing te verbeter. Die navorsingsontwerp van die huidige studie is die van ‘n beskrywende inhoudsanalise, wat fokus op wetenskaplike artikels wat nie net berig oor kwalitatiwe studies nie, maar ook verwys na die gebruik van CAQDAS, en die geldigheidstegnieke wat tydens die navorsingsproses toegepas is, bespreek. Doelgerigte steekproeftrekking is toegepas en 108 artikels, wat gepubliseer is vanaf 1996-2009, was geselekteer op grond van die feit dat hulle aan die seleksie kriteria voldoen. Die artikels was geïdentifiseer deur aanlyn soektogte van verskeie bibliografiese databasisse en soekenjins. Die studie ondersoek drie oorwegende navorsingsvrae met betrekking tot die volgende: (1) die sagteware programme wat die meeste gebruik word; (2) neigings in die gebruik van CAQDAS oor verloop van ‘n tydperk; sowel as (3) die geldigheidstegnieke wat in die ondersoekte wetenskaplike artikels vi gerapporteer word, deur onderskeid te tref tussen tegnieke wat met of sonder die gebruik van CAQDAS uitgevoer word. Met verwysing na die eerste twee navorsingsvrae, was dit gevind dat die drie algemeenste sagteware programme wat gebruik is, QSR N programme (insluitend NUD.IST, NVivo, N4, N5 en N6), gevolg deur Atlas.ti en MAXqda (insluitend die vroëere weergawe winMAX) is, en dat daar oor die algemeen ‘n toename is in die getal kwalitatiewe navorsingsartikels oor die afgelope 13 jaar (1996-2009), wat die gebruik van CAQDAS rapporteer. Die ondersoek na geldigheidstegnieke wat in kwalitatiewe navorsing gebruik word, soos berig in die ondersoekte wetenskaplike artikels, het getoon dat die tegnieke in die meeste gevalle sonder die gebruik van CAQDAS uitgevoer is. Ten spyte van die feit dat die gebruik van CAQDAS voordele inhou, word die meerderheid geldigheidstegnieke wat gerapporteeer word, steeds sonder die gebruik van CAQDAS uitgevoer. Tegnieke wat nie sonder die hulp van CAQDAS uitegevoer kon word nie, is gebaseer op die data vertoningsvermoë van CAQDAS, sowel as op die akkuraatheid en konsekwentheid waarmee CAQDAS sekere opdragte uitvoer. Die bevindinge wat gegenereer is deur hierdie studie blyk asof dit die hipotese ondersteun dat CAQDAS nie opsig self die geldigheid versterk nie, aangesien dit oorwegend bloot as ‘n navorsingsinstrument gebruik word.
Westrick, Paul Andrew. "Validity decay versus validity stability in stem and non-stem fields." Diss., University of Iowa, 2012. https://ir.uiowa.edu/etd/3402.
Full textThomas, Adrain L. "Accounting for correlated artifacts and true validity in validity generalization procedures : an extension of model 1 for assessing validity generalization." Diss., Georgia Institute of Technology, 1997. http://hdl.handle.net/1853/28967.
Full textTng, Thiam-huat. "Validity of cephalometric landmarks." Click to view the E-thesis via HKUTO, 1991. http://sunzi.lib.hku.hk/HKUTO/record/B38628399.
Full textWilliams, S. G. "Meaning, validity and necessity." Thesis, University of Oxford, 1985. http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.354816.
Full text湯添發 and Thiam-huat Tng. "Validity of cephalometric landmarks." Thesis, The University of Hong Kong (Pokfulam, Hong Kong), 1991. http://hub.hku.hk/bib/B38628399.
Full textKampakoglou, Kyriaki. "Neuromarketing : Validity and Morality." Thesis, Högskolan i Borås, Institutionen Textilhögskolan, 2012. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:hb:diva-16794.
Full textProgram: Master in Fashion Management with specialisation in Fashion Marketing and Retailing
Lu, Yi, and John Potter. "Object validity and effects." Thesis, University of New South Wales, 2008. http://unsworks.unsw.edu.au/fapi/datastream/unsworks:1679/SOURCE02?view=true.
Full textThe object-oriented community is paying increasing attention to techniques for object instance encapsulation and alias protection. Formal techniques for modular verification of programs at the level of objects are being developed hand in hand with type systems and static analysis techniques for restricting the structure of runtime object graphs. Ownership type systems have provided a sound basis for such structural restrictions by being able to statically represent an extensible object ownership hierarchy. However, such structural restrictions may potentially have limitations on cases when more flexible reference structures are desired. In this thesis, we present a different encapsulation technique, called Effect Encapsulation, which confines side effects rather than object references. With relaxed restriction on reference structure, it is able to express certain common object-oriented patterns which cannot be expressed in Ownership Types. From this basis, we also describe a model of Object Validity --- a framework for reasoning about object invariants. Such a framework can track the effect and dependency of method calls on object invariants within an ownership-based type system, even in the presence of re-entrant calls. Moreover, we present an access control technique for protecting object instances. Combined with context variance, the resulting type system allows for a more flexible and useful access control policy, hence is capable of expressing more object-oriented patterns.
Bester, Kyle John. "The external validity of South African substance use contextual risk instrument: predictive validity." University of the Western Cape, 2017. http://hdl.handle.net/11394/5689.
Full textThe purpose of the present study was to gather further external validity evidence towards the validity argument for an instrument designed to measure individual and contextual factors associated with adolescent substance use in low socio-economic status communities in the Western Cape, South Africa. The South African Substance Use Contextual Risk Instrument (SASUCRI) measures adolescents' subjective experiences of their own psycho-social and their communities' functioning. The present study uses secondary data analysis in order to further evaluate its external validity. Both content and structural evidence for the instrument has been gathered in the larger study in which the present study is located. Validity theory was used as the theoretical framework for the gathering of the different types of evidence in support of the validity argument for this instrument. The study employed non-probability purposive sampling to select schools from three education districts from which twenty-six schools were selected where the sample total was N=1959. English and Afrikaans versions of the instrument were administered to English- and Afrikaans home language, school-going adolescents, aged 12 to 21 years. All ethical standards were maintained throughout the research process. External evidence procedures were conducted using Discriminant Function Analysis (DFA) to evaluate the extent to which the instrument could discriminate between substance using and non-using adolescents. The DFA revealed that nine SASUCRI sub-scales totals can act as significant predictors to substance use among adolescents based on the predictive validity of sub-scales.
Books on the topic "Validity"
Howard, Wainer, Braun Henry I. 1949-, and Educational Testing Service, eds. Test validity. Hillsdale, N.J: L. Erlbaum Associates, 1988.
Find full text1941-, Bickman Leonard, ed. Validity & social experimentation. Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage Publications, 2000.
Find full textJansen, Paulus Gerardus Wilhelmus, 1954-, ed. Validity generalization revisited. Delft, The Netherlands: Delft University Press, 1986.
Find full textKulisch, Ulrich. Computer arithmetic and validity. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2013.
Find full textRiezler, Stefan, and Michael Hagmann. Validity, Reliability, and Significance. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-02183-1.
Full textBelbin, Stephen. The validity of sampling. London: Chelsea College of Art and Design, 2002.
Find full textRiezler, Stefan, and Michael Hagmann. Validity, Reliability, and Significance. Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland, 2024. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-57065-0.
Full textWesterman, Pauline, Jaap Hage, Stephan Kirste, and Anne Ruth Mackor, eds. Legal Validity and Soft Law. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77522-7.
Full textTyler, Forrest B., Deborah Ridley Brome, and Janice E. Williams. Ethnic Validity, Ecology, and Psychotherapy. Boston, MA: Springer US, 1991. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-0603-8.
Full textRoussos, Louis A. LSAT item-type validity study. Newtown, PA: Law School Admission Council, 1998.
Find full textBook chapters on the topic "Validity"
Wanlass, Richard L. "Validity." In The Neuropsychology Toolkit, 111–16. Boston, MA: Springer US, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-1882-5_15.
Full textZiegler, Matthias, and Lena Lämmle. "Validity." In Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences, 5687–93. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24612-3_1354.
Full textKleinbaum, David G., Kevin M. Sullivan, and Nancy D. Barker. "Validity." In ActivEpi Companion Textbook, 175–93. New York, NY: Springer New York, 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5428-1_7.
Full textLevesque, Roger J. R. "Validity." In Encyclopedia of Adolescence, 3037. New York, NY: Springer New York, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1695-2_622.
Full textBellamy, Nicholas. "Validity." In Musculoskeletal Clinical Metrology, 25–29. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 1993. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-2218-4_4.
Full textIacona, Andrea. "Validity." In Logical Form, 85–97. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74154-3_7.
Full textTurner, J. Rick. "Validity." In Encyclopedia of Behavioral Medicine, 2301. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-39903-0_1080.
Full textTurner, J. Rick, J. Rick Turner, Jonathan Newman, Alexandra Erdmann, Erin Costanzo, Leah Rosenberg, Jonathan Newman, et al. "Validity." In Encyclopedia of Behavioral Medicine, 2025. New York, NY: Springer New York, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1005-9_1080.
Full textNahler, Gerhard. "validity." In Dictionary of Pharmaceutical Medicine, 188. Vienna: Springer Vienna, 2009. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-211-89836-9_1441.
Full textSpelman, William. "Validity." In Criminal Incapacitation, 21–53. Boston, MA: Springer US, 1994. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-4885-7_2.
Full textConference papers on the topic "Validity"
McKinley, Danette. "Rethinking Validity Evidence: Consequential Validity." In AERA 2024. USA: AERA, 2024. http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/ip.24.2111218.
Full textMilligan, Sandra, Jiazhen He, James Bailey, Rui Zhang, and Benjamin I. P. Rubinstein. "Validity." In the Sixth International Conference. New York, New York, USA: ACM Press, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2883851.2883956.
Full textOuchicha, Chaimae, Ouafae Ammor, and Mohammed Meknassi. "Cluster validity index." In the International Conference. New York, New York, USA: ACM Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3230905.3230917.
Full textPopescu, Mihail, James M. Keller, James C. Bezdek, and Timothy Havens. "Correlation cluster validity." In 2011 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics - SMC. IEEE, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/icsmc.2011.6084057.
Full textSuryanarayanan, P., D. K. Kumar, and P. Burton. "Validity of Polygraphs." In 2005 IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology 27th Annual Conference. IEEE, 2005. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/iembs.2005.1616639.
Full textTlili, Mania, and Tarek M. Hamdani. "Big data clustering validity." In 2014 6th International Conference of Soft Computing and Pattern Recognition (SoCPaR). IEEE, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/socpar.2014.7008031.
Full textSapir, Marina, and Mikhail Teverovskiy. "Validity of Probabilistic Rules." In 2007 IEEE Symposium on Computational Intelligence and Data Mining. IEEE, 2007. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/cidm.2007.368845.
Full textPacut, A., and W. J. Kolodziej. "Validity of model simplification." In 29th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control. IEEE, 1990. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/cdc.1990.203313.
Full textKochneva, Elena, and Aleksandar Sukalo. "Energy meter readings validity." In 2017 IEEE 58th International Scientific Conference on Power and Electrical Engineering of Riga Technical University (RTUCON). IEEE, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/rtucon.2017.8124813.
Full textFrancisco Sánchez Díaz, Félix. "Legal validity as membership." In XXVI World Congress of Philosophy of Law and Social Philosophy. Initia Via, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.17931/ivr2013_sws30_02.
Full textReports on the topic "Validity"
Bo, Hao, and Sebastian Galiani. Assessing External Validity. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research, November 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.3386/w26422.
Full textAndrews, Isaiah, and Emily Oster. Weighting for External Validity. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research, September 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.3386/w23826.
Full textBlaylock, B. G., F. O. Hoffman, and R. H. Gardner. (Validity of environmental transfer models). Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI), November 1990. http://dx.doi.org/10.2172/6375614.
Full textKitagawa, Toru. A Test for Instrument Validity. IFS, August 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1920/wp.cem.2014.3414.
Full textGaliani, Sebastian, and Brian Quistorff. Assessing External Validity in Practice. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research, August 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.3386/w30398.
Full textPritchett, Lant. The Evidence About What Works in Education: Graphs to Illustrate External Validity and Construct Validity. Research on Improving Systems of Education (RISE), June 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.35489/bsg-rise-ri_2017/002.
Full textRosenzweig, Mark, and Christopher Udry. External Validity in a Stochastic World. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research, July 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.3386/w22449.
Full textFoley, Paul P. Validity Generalization of Navy Selector Composites. Fort Belvoir, VA: Defense Technical Information Center, May 1986. http://dx.doi.org/10.21236/ada168363.
Full textVickers, Jr, and Ross R. Construct Validity of Physical Fitness Tests. Fort Belvoir, VA: Defense Technical Information Center, February 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.21236/ada625998.
Full textTrunt, Aaron, Cody Reed, and Lisa MacFadden. Validity of Instrumented Medicine Ball Measurements. Purdue University, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.5703/1288284317498.
Full text