Log in

Relevant bibliographies by topics / Utility-privacy trade-off

Contents

Journal articles
Dissertations / Theses
Book chapters
Conference papers

Academic literature on the topic 'Utility-privacy trade-off'

Author: Grafiati

Published: 11 January 2025

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Utility-privacy trade-off.'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Journal articles on the topic "Utility-privacy trade-off"

1

Liu, Hai, Zhenqiang Wu, Yihui Zhou, Changgen Peng, Feng Tian, and Laifeng Lu. "Privacy-Preserving Monotonicity of Differential Privacy Mechanisms." Applied Sciences 8, no. 11 (October 28, 2018): 2081. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/app8112081.

Full text

Abstract:

Differential privacy mechanisms can offer a trade-off between privacy and utility by using privacy metrics and utility metrics. The trade-off of differential privacy shows that one thing increases and another decreases in terms of privacy metrics and utility metrics. However, there is no unified trade-off measurement of differential privacy mechanisms. To this end, we proposed the definition of privacy-preserving monotonicity of differential privacy, which measured the trade-off between privacy and utility. First, to formulate the trade-off, we presented the definition of privacy-preserving monotonicity based on computational indistinguishability. Second, building on privacy metrics of the expected estimation error and entropy, we theoretically and numerically showed privacy-preserving monotonicity of Laplace mechanism, Gaussian mechanism, exponential mechanism, and randomized response mechanism. In addition, we also theoretically and numerically analyzed the utility monotonicity of these several differential privacy mechanisms based on utility metrics of modulus of characteristic function and variant of normalized entropy. Third, according to the privacy-preserving monotonicity of differential privacy, we presented a method to seek trade-off under a semi-honest model and analyzed a unilateral trade-off under a rational model. Therefore, privacy-preserving monotonicity can be used as a criterion to evaluate the trade-off between privacy and utility in differential privacy mechanisms under the semi-honest model. However, privacy-preserving monotonicity results in a unilateral trade-off of the rational model, which can lead to severe consequences.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

2

Avent, Brendan, Javier González, Tom Diethe, Andrei Paleyes, and Borja Balle. "Automatic Discovery of Privacy–Utility Pareto Fronts." Proceedings on Privacy Enhancing Technologies 2020, no. 4 (October 1, 2020): 5–23. http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/popets-2020-0060.

Full text

Abstract:

AbstractDifferential privacy is a mathematical framework for privacy-preserving data analysis. Changing the hyperparameters of a differentially private algorithm allows one to trade off privacy and utility in a principled way. Quantifying this trade-off in advance is essential to decision-makers tasked with deciding how much privacy can be provided in a particular application while maintaining acceptable utility. Analytical utility guarantees offer a rigorous tool to reason about this tradeoff, but are generally only available for relatively simple problems. For more complex tasks, such as training neural networks under differential privacy, the utility achieved by a given algorithm can only be measured empirically. This paper presents a Bayesian optimization methodology for efficiently characterizing the privacy– utility trade-off of any differentially private algorithm using only empirical measurements of its utility. The versatility of our method is illustrated on a number of machine learning tasks involving multiple models, optimizers, and datasets.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

3

Gobinathan, B., M. A. Mukunthan, S. Surendran, K. Somasundaram, Syed Abdul Moeed, P. Niranjan, V. Gouthami, et al. "A Novel Method to Solve Real Time Security Issues in Software Industry Using Advanced Cryptographic Techniques." Scientific Programming 2021 (December 28, 2021): 1–9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/3611182.

Full text

Abstract:

In recent times, the utility and privacy are trade-off factors with the performance of one factor tends to sacrifice the other. Therefore, the dataset cannot be published without privacy. It is henceforth crucial to maintain an equilibrium between the utility and privacy of data. In this paper, a novel technique on trade-off between the utility and privacy is developed, where the former is developed with a metaheuristic algorithm and the latter is developed using a cryptographic model. The utility is carried out with the process of clustering, and the privacy model encrypts and decrypts the model. At first, the input datasets are clustered, and after clustering, the privacy of data is maintained. The simulation is conducted on the manufacturing datasets over various existing models. The results show that the proposed model shows improved clustering accuracy and data privacy than the existing models. The evaluation with the proposed model shows a trade-off privacy preservation and utility clustering in smart manufacturing datasets.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

4

Zeng, Xia, Chuanchuan Yang, and Bin Dai. "Utility–Privacy Trade-Off in Distributed Machine Learning Systems." Entropy 24, no. 9 (September 14, 2022): 1299. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/e24091299.

Full text

Abstract:

In distributed machine learning (DML), though clients’ data are not directly transmitted to the server for model training, attackers can obtain the sensitive information of clients by analyzing the local gradient parameters uploaded by clients. For this case, we use the differential privacy (DP) mechanism to protect the clients’ local parameters. In this paper, from an information-theoretic point of view, we study the utility–privacy trade-off in DML with the help of the DP mechanism. Specifically, three cases including independent clients’ local parameters with independent DP noise, dependent clients’ local parameters with independent/dependent DP noise are considered. Mutual information and conditional mutual information are used to characterize utility and privacy, respectively. First, we show the relationship between utility and privacy for the three cases. Then, we show the optimal noise variance that achieves the maximal utility under a certain level of privacy. Finally, the results of this paper are further illustrated by numerical results

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

5

Srivastava, Saurabh, Vinay P. Namboodiri, and T. V. Prabhakar. "Achieving Privacy-Utility Trade-off in existing Software Systems." Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1454 (February 2020): 012004. http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1454/1/012004.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

6

Wunderlich, Dominik, Daniel Bernau, Francesco Aldà, Javier Parra-Arnau, and Thorsten Strufe. "On the Privacy–Utility Trade-Off in Differentially Private Hierarchical Text Classification." Applied Sciences 12, no. 21 (November 4, 2022): 11177. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/app122111177.

Full text

Abstract:

Hierarchical text classification consists of classifying text documents into a hierarchy of classes and sub-classes. Although Artificial Neural Networks have proved useful to perform this task, unfortunately, they can leak training data information to adversaries due to training data memorization. Using differential privacy during model training can mitigate leakage attacks against trained models, enabling the models to be shared safely at the cost of reduced model accuracy. This work investigates the privacy–utility trade-off in hierarchical text classification with differential privacy guarantees, and it identifies neural network architectures that offer superior trade-offs. To this end, we use a white-box membership inference attack to empirically assess the information leakage of three widely used neural network architectures. We show that large differential privacy parameters already suffice to completely mitigate membership inference attacks, thus resulting only in a moderate decrease in model utility. More specifically, for large datasets with long texts, we observed Transformer-based models to achieve an overall favorable privacy–utility trade-off, while for smaller datasets with shorter texts, convolutional neural networks are preferable.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

7

Mohammed, Kabiru, Aladdin Ayesh, and Eerke Boiten. "Complementing Privacy and Utility Trade-Off with Self-Organising Maps." Cryptography 5, no. 3 (August 17, 2021): 20. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cryptography5030020.

Full text

Abstract:

In recent years, data-enabled technologies have intensified the rate and scale at which organisations collect and analyse data. Data mining techniques are applied to realise the full potential of large-scale data analysis. These techniques are highly efficient in sifting through big data to extract hidden knowledge and assist evidence-based decisions, offering significant benefits to their adopters. However, this capability is constrained by important legal, ethical and reputational concerns. These concerns arise because they can be exploited to allow inferences to be made on sensitive data, thus posing severe threats to individuals’ privacy. Studies have shown Privacy-Preserving Data Mining (PPDM) can adequately address this privacy risk and permit knowledge extraction in mining processes. Several published works in this area have utilised clustering techniques to enforce anonymisation models on private data, which work by grouping the data into clusters using a quality measure and generalising the data in each group separately to achieve an anonymisation threshold. However, existing approaches do not work well with high-dimensional data, since it is difficult to develop good groupings without incurring excessive information loss. Our work aims to complement this balancing act by optimising utility in PPDM processes. To illustrate this, we propose a hybrid approach, that combines self-organising maps with conventional privacy-based clustering algorithms. We demonstrate through experimental evaluation, that results from our approach produce more utility for data mining tasks and outperforms conventional privacy-based clustering algorithms. This approach can significantly enable large-scale analysis of data in a privacy-preserving and trustworthy manner.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

8

Kiranagi, Manasi, Devika Dhoble, Madeeha Tahoor, and Dr Rekha Patil. "Finding Optimal Path and Privacy Preserving for Wireless Network." International Journal for Research in Applied Science and Engineering Technology 10, no. 10 (October 31, 2022): 360–65. http://dx.doi.org/10.22214/ijraset.2022.46949.

Full text

Abstract:

Abstract: Privacy-preserving routing protocols in wireless networks frequently utilize additional artificial traffic to hide the source-destination identities of the communicating pair. Usually, the addition of artificial traffic is done heuristically with no guarantees that the transmission cost, latency, etc., are optimized in every network topology. We explicitly examine the privacyutility trade-off problem for wireless networks and develop a novel privacy-preserving routing algorithm called Optimal Privacy Enhancing Routing Algorithm (OPERA). OPERA uses a statistical decision-making framework to optimize the privacy of the routing protocol given a utility (or cost) constraint. We consider global adversaries with both Lossless and lossy observations that use the Bayesian maximum-a-posteriori (MAP) estimation strategy. We formulate the privacy-utility trade-off problem as a linear program which can be efficiently solved.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

9

Cai, Lin, Jinchuan Tang, Shuping Dang, and Gaojie Chen. "Privacy protection and utility trade-off for social graph embedding." Information Sciences 676 (August 2024): 120866. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2024.120866.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

10

Rassouli, Borzoo, and Deniz Gunduz. "Optimal Utility-Privacy Trade-Off With Total Variation Distance as a Privacy Measure." IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security 15 (2020): 594–603. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/tifs.2019.2903658.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

More sources

Dissertations / Theses on the topic "Utility-privacy trade-off"

1

Aldà, Francesco [Verfasser], Hans Ulrich [Gutachter] Simon, and Alexander [Gutachter] May. "On the trade-off between privacy and utility in statistical data analysis / Francesco Aldà ; Gutachter: Hans Ulrich Simon, Alexander May ; Fakultät für Mathematik." Bochum : Ruhr-Universität Bochum, 2018. http://d-nb.info/1161942416/34.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

2

Kaplan, Caelin. "Compromis inhérents à l'apprentissage automatique préservant la confidentialité." Electronic Thesis or Diss., Université Côte d'Azur, 2024. http://www.theses.fr/2024COAZ4045.

Full text

Abstract:

À mesure que les modèles d'apprentissage automatique (ML) sont de plus en plus intégrés dans un large éventail d'applications, il devient plus important que jamais de garantir la confidentialité des données des individus. Cependant, les techniques actuelles entraînent souvent une perte d'utilité et peuvent affecter des facteurs comme l'équité et l'interprétabilité. Cette thèse vise à approfondir la compréhension des compromis dans trois techniques de ML respectueuses de la vie privée : la confidentialité différentielle, les défenses empiriques, et l'apprentissage fédéré, et à proposer des méthodes qui améliorent leur efficacité tout en maintenant la protection de la vie privée. La première étude examine l'impact de la confidentialité différentielle sur l'équité entre les groupes définis par des attributs sensibles. Alors que certaines hypothèses précédentes suggéraient que la confidentialité différentielle pourrait exacerber l'injustice dans les modèles ML, nos expériences montrent que la sélection d'une architecture de modèle optimale et le réglage des hyperparamètres pour DP-SGD (Descente de Gradient Stochastique Différentiellement Privée) peuvent atténuer les disparités d'équité. En utilisant des ensembles de données standards dans la littérature sur l'équité du ML, nous montrons que les disparités entre les groupes pour les métriques telles que la parité démographique, l'égalité des chances et la parité prédictive sont souvent réduites ou négligeables par rapport aux modèles non privés. La deuxième étude se concentre sur les défenses empiriques de la vie privée, qui visent à protéger les données d'entraînement tout en minimisant la perte d'utilité. La plupart des défenses existantes supposent l'accès à des données de référence — un ensemble de données supplémentaire provenant de la même distribution (ou similaire) que les données d'entraînement. Cependant, les travaux antérieurs n'ont que rarement évalué les risques de confidentialité associés aux données de référence. Pour y remédier, nous avons réalisé la première analyse complète de la confidentialité des données de référence dans les défenses empiriques. Nous avons proposé une méthode de défense de référence, la minimisation du risque empirique pondéré (WERM), qui permet de mieux comprendre les compromis entre l'utilité du modèle, la confidentialité des données d'entraînement et celle des données de référence. En plus d'offrir des garanties théoriques, WERM surpasse régulièrement les défenses empiriques de pointe dans presque tous les régimes de confidentialité relatifs. La troisième étude aborde les compromis liés à la convergence dans les systèmes d'inférence collaborative (CIS), de plus en plus utilisés dans l'Internet des objets (IoT) pour permettre aux nœuds plus petits de décharger une partie de leurs tâches d'inférence vers des nœuds plus puissants. Alors que l'apprentissage fédéré (FL) est souvent utilisé pour entraîner conjointement les modèles dans ces systèmes, les méthodes traditionnelles ont négligé la dynamique opérationnelle, comme l'hétérogénéité des taux de service entre les nœuds. Nous proposons une approche FL novatrice, spécialement conçue pour les CIS, qui prend en compte les taux de service variables et la disponibilité inégale des données. Notre cadre offre des garanties théoriques et surpasse systématiquement les algorithmes de pointe, en particulier dans les scénarios où les appareils finaux gèrent des taux de requêtes d'inférence élevés. En conclusion, cette thèse contribue à l'amélioration des techniques de ML respectueuses de la vie privée en analysant les compromis entre confidentialité, utilité et autres facteurs. Les méthodes proposées offrent des solutions pratiques pour intégrer ces techniques dans des applications réelles, en assurant une meilleure protection des données personnelles
As machine learning (ML) models are increasingly integrated into a wide range of applications, ensuring the privacy of individuals' data is becoming more important than ever. However, privacy-preserving ML techniques often result in reduced task-specific utility and may negatively impact other essential factors like fairness, robustness, and interpretability. These challenges have limited the widespread adoption of privacy-preserving methods. This thesis aims to address these challenges through two primary goals: (1) to deepen the understanding of key trade-offs in three privacy-preserving ML techniques—differential privacy, empirical privacy defenses, and federated learning; (2) to propose novel methods and algorithms that improve utility and effectiveness while maintaining privacy protections. The first study in this thesis investigates how differential privacy impacts fairness across groups defined by sensitive attributes. While previous assumptions suggested that differential privacy could exacerbate unfairness in ML models, our experiments demonstrate that selecting an optimal model architecture and tuning hyperparameters for DP-SGD (Differentially Private Stochastic Gradient Descent) can mitigate fairness disparities. Using standard ML fairness datasets, we show that group disparities in metrics like demographic parity, equalized odds, and predictive parity are often reduced or remain negligible when compared to non-private baselines, challenging the prevailing notion that differential privacy worsens fairness for underrepresented groups. The second study focuses on empirical privacy defenses, which aim to protect training data privacy while minimizing utility loss. Most existing defenses assume access to reference data---an additional dataset from the same or a similar distribution as the training data. However, previous works have largely neglected to evaluate the privacy risks associated with reference data. To address this, we conducted the first comprehensive analysis of reference data privacy in empirical defenses. We proposed a baseline defense method, Weighted Empirical Risk Minimization (WERM), which allows for a clearer understanding of the trade-offs between model utility, training data privacy, and reference data privacy. In addition to offering theoretical guarantees on model utility and the relative privacy of training and reference data, WERM consistently outperforms state-of-the-art empirical privacy defenses in nearly all relative privacy regimes.The third study addresses the convergence-related trade-offs in Collaborative Inference Systems (CISs), which are increasingly used in the Internet of Things (IoT) to enable smaller nodes in a network to offload part of their inference tasks to more powerful nodes. While Federated Learning (FL) is often used to jointly train models within CISs, traditional methods have overlooked the operational dynamics of these systems, such as heterogeneity in serving rates across nodes. We propose a novel FL approach explicitly designed for CISs, which accounts for varying serving rates and uneven data availability. Our framework provides theoretical guarantees and consistently outperforms state-of-the-art algorithms, particularly in scenarios where end devices handle high inference request rates.In conclusion, this thesis advances the field of privacy-preserving ML by addressing key trade-offs in differential privacy, empirical privacy defenses, and federated learning. The proposed methods provide new insights into balancing privacy with utility and other critical factors, offering practical solutions for integrating privacy-preserving techniques into real-world applications. These contributions aim to support the responsible and ethical deployment of AI technologies that prioritize data privacy and protection

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Book chapters on the topic "Utility-privacy trade-off"

1

Alvim, Mário S., Miguel E. Andrés, Konstantinos Chatzikokolakis, Pierpaolo Degano, and Catuscia Palamidessi. "Differential Privacy: On the Trade-Off between Utility and Information Leakage." In Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 39–54. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-29420-4_3.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

2

Tang, Jingye, Tianqing Zhu, Ping Xiong, Yu Wang, and Wei Ren. "Privacy and Utility Trade-Off for Textual Analysis via Calibrated Multivariate Perturbations." In Network and System Security, 342–53. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-65745-1_20.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

3

Rafiei, Majid, Frederik Wangelik, and Wil M. P. van der Aalst. "TraVaS: Differentially Private Trace Variant Selection for Process Mining." In Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, 114–26. Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-27815-0_9.

Full text

Abstract:

AbstractIn the area of industrial process mining, privacy-preserving event data publication is becoming increasingly relevant. Consequently, the trade-off between high data utility and quantifiable privacy poses new challenges. State-of-the-art research mainly focuses on differentially private trace variant construction based on prefix expansion methods. However, these algorithms face several practical limitations such as high computational complexity, introducing fake variants, removing frequent variants, and a bounded variant length. In this paper, we introduce a new approach for direct differentially private trace variant release which uses anonymized partition selection strategies to overcome the aforementioned restraints. Experimental results on real-life event data show that our algorithm outperforms state-of-the-art methods in terms of both plain data utility and result utility preservation.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

4

Thouvenot, Maxime, Olivier Curé, Lynda Temal, Sarra Ben Abbès, and Philippe Calvez. "Knowledge Graph Publishing with Anatomy, Toward a New Privacy and Utility Trade-Off." In Advances in Knowledge Discovery and Management, 55–79. Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland, 2024. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-40403-0_3.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

5

Peng, Lian, and Meikang Qiu. "AI in Healthcare Data Privacy-Preserving: Enhanced Trade-Off Between Security and Utility." In Knowledge Science, Engineering and Management, 349–60. Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore, 2024. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-5498-4_27.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

6

Liu, Yang, and Andrew Simpson. "On the Trade-Off Between Privacy and Utility in Mobile Services: A Qualitative Study." In Computer Security, 261–78. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42048-2_17.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

7

Ghatak, Debolina, and Kouichi Sakurai. "A Survey on Privacy Preserving Synthetic Data Generation and a Discussion on a Privacy-Utility Trade-off Problem." In Communications in Computer and Information Science, 167–80. Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-7769-5_13.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

8

Demir, Mehmet Özgün, Ali Emre Pusane, Guido Dartmann, and Güneş Karabulut Kurt. "Utility privacy trade-off in communication systems." In Big Data Analytics for Cyber-Physical Systems, 293–314. Elsevier, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-816637-6.00014-2.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

9

Kaabachi, Bayrem, Jérémie Despraz, Thierry Meurers, Fabian Prasser, and Jean Louis Raisaro. "Generation and Evaluation of Synthetic Data in a University Hospital Setting." In Studies in Health Technology and Informatics. IOS Press, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/shti220420.

Full text

Abstract:

In this study, we propose a unified evaluation framework for systematically assessing the utility-privacy trade-off of synthetic data generation (SDG) models. These SDG models are adapted to deal with longitudinal or tabular data stemming from electronic health records (EHR) containing both discrete and numeric features. Our evaluation framework considers different data sharing scenarios and attacker models.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

10

Corbucci, Luca, Mikko A. Heikkilä, David Solans Noguero, Anna Monreale, and Nicolas Kourtellis. "PUFFLE: Balancing Privacy, Utility, and Fairness in Federated Learning." In Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications. IOS Press, 2024. http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/faia240671.

Full text

Abstract:

Training and deploying Machine Learning models that simultaneously adhere to principles of fairness and privacy while ensuring good utility poses a significant challenge. The interplay between these three factors of trustworthiness is frequently underestimated and remains insufficiently explored. Consequently, many efforts focus on ensuring only two of these factors, neglecting one in the process. The decentralization of the datasets and the variations in distributions among the clients exacerbate the complexity of achieving this ethical trade-off in the context of Federated Learning (FL). For the first time in FL literature, we address these three factors of trustworthiness. We introduce PUFFLE, a high-level parameterised approach that can help in the exploration of the balance between utility, privacy, and fairness in FL scenarios. We prove that PUFFLE can be effective across diverse datasets, models, and data distributions, reducing the model unfairness up to 75%, with a maximum reduction in the utility of 17% in the worst-case scenario, while maintaining strict privacy guarantees during the FL training.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Conference papers on the topic "Utility-privacy trade-off"

1

Pohlhausen, Jule, Francesco Nespoli, and Joerg Bitzer. "Long-Term Conversation Analysis: Privacy-Utility Trade-Off Under Noise and Reverberation." In 2024 18th International Workshop on Acoustic Signal Enhancement (IWAENC), 404–8. IEEE, 2024. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/iwaenc61483.2024.10694640.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

2

Nam, Seung-Hyun, Hyun-Young Park, and Si-Hyeon Lee. "Achieving the Exactly Optimal Privacy-Utility Trade-Off with Low Communication Cost via Shared Randomness." In 2024 IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory (ISIT), 3065–70. IEEE, 2024. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/isit57864.2024.10619385.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

3

Baselizadeh, Adel, Diana Saplacan Lindblom, Weria Khaksar, Md Zia Uddin, and Jim Torresen. "Comparative Analysis of Vision-Based Sensors for Human Monitoring in Care Robots: Exploring the Utility-Privacy Trade-off." In 2024 33rd IEEE International Conference on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (ROMAN), 1794–801. IEEE, 2024. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ro-man60168.2024.10731223.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

4

Erdogdu, Murat A., and Nadia Fawaz. "Privacy-utility trade-off under continual observation." In 2015 IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory (ISIT). IEEE, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/isit.2015.7282766.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

5

Zhou, Yihui, Guangchen Song, Hai Liu, and Laifeng Lu. "Privacy-Utility Trade-Off of K-Subset Mechanism." In 2018 International Conference on Networking and Network Applications (NaNA). IEEE, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/nana.2018.8648741.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

6

Li, Mengqian, Youliang Tian, Junpeng Zhang, Dandan Fan, and Dongmei Zhao. "The Trade-off Between Privacy and Utility in Local Differential Privacy." In 2021 International Conference on Networking and Network Applications (NaNA). IEEE, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/nana53684.2021.00071.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

7

Sreekumar, Sreejith, and Deniz Gunduz. "Optimal Privacy-Utility Trade-off under a Rate Constraint." In 2019 IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory (ISIT). IEEE, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/isit.2019.8849330.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

8

Alvim, Mário S., Natasha Fernandes, Annabelle McIver, and Gabriel H. Nunes. "The Privacy-Utility Trade-off in the Topics API." In CCS '24: ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security, 1106–20. New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1145/3658644.3670368.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

9

Zhou, Jinhao, Zhou Su, Jianbing Ni, Yuntao Wang, Yanghe Pan, and Rui Xing. "Personalized Privacy-Preserving Federated Learning: Optimized Trade-off Between Utility and Privacy." In GLOBECOM 2022 - 2022 IEEE Global Communications Conference. IEEE, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/globecom48099.2022.10000793.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

10

Demir, Mehmet Oezguen, Selahattin Goekceli, Guido Dartmann, Volker Luecken, Gerd Ascheid, and Guenes Karabulut Kurt. "Utility Privacy Trade-Off for Noisy Channels in OFDM Systems." In 2017 IEEE 86th Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC-Fall). IEEE, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/vtcfall.2017.8288194.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!