Academic literature on the topic 'Utilitarian reasoning'
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Utilitarian reasoning.'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Journal articles on the topic "Utilitarian reasoning"
AGAR, NICHOLAS. "Moral Bioenhancement and the Utilitarian Catastrophe." Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 24, no. 1 (December 4, 2014): 37–47. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0963180114000280.
Full textThomas, Bradley C., Katie E. Croft, and Daniel Tranel. "Harming Kin to Save Strangers: Further Evidence for Abnormally Utilitarian Moral Judgments after Ventromedial Prefrontal Damage." Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 23, no. 9 (September 2011): 2186–96. http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2010.21591.
Full textChirove, Munyaradzi, David Mogari, and Ogbonnaya Ugorji. "Students’ mathematics-related belief systems and their strategies for solving non-routine mathematical problems." Waikato Journal of Education 27, no. 3 (December 9, 2022): 101–21. http://dx.doi.org/10.15663/wje.v27i3.822.
Full textLavoie, Jennifer, Pooja Megha Nagar, and Victoria Talwar. "From Kantian to Machiavellian deceivers: Development of children’s reasoning and self-reported use of secrets and lies." Childhood 24, no. 2 (October 16, 2016): 197–211. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0907568216671179.
Full textJaquet, François, and Florian Cova. "Beyond moral dilemmas: The role of reasoning in five categories of utilitarian judgment." Cognition 209 (April 2021): 104572. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104572.
Full textSerafimova, Silviya. "Moral Challenges for Bauer’s Project of a Two-level Utilitarian AMA." Balkan Journal of Philosophy 14, no. 2 (2022): 115–26. http://dx.doi.org/10.5840/bjp202214215.
Full textDobrijevic, Aleksandar. ""Critique of intuitive reason"." Filozofija i drustvo, no. 26 (2005): 179–226. http://dx.doi.org/10.2298/fid0526179d.
Full textHuang, Karen, Joshua D. Greene, and Max Bazerman. "Veil-of-ignorance reasoning favors the greater good." Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 116, no. 48 (November 12, 2019): 23989–95. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1910125116.
Full textAcevedo-Triana, César A., Juan Francisco Muñoz Olano, and Pablo Reyes. "Differences on Utilitarian and Moral Decision Between Male and Female." Pensamiento Psicológico 17, no. 1 (March 23, 2019): 45–60. http://dx.doi.org/10.11144/javerianacali.ppsi17-1.dumd.
Full textMartin, Rose, Petko Kusev, Joseph Teal, Victoria Baranova, and Bruce Rigal. "Moral Decision Making: From Bentham to Veil of Ignorance via Perspective Taking Accessibility." Behavioral Sciences 11, no. 5 (May 1, 2021): 66. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/bs11050066.
Full textDissertations / Theses on the topic "Utilitarian reasoning"
Kuo, Chi-Ting, and 郭紀廷. "The study of college students’ moral reasoning on utilitarian v. justice dilemmas and exploration of its correlates." Thesis, 2016. http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/60442342944260221509.
Full text國立臺南大學
教育學系測驗統計碩博士班
104
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the psychometric characteristics of utilitarian v. justice scale, and assess the current status of the moral reasoning of students on utilitarian and justice dilemmas based on daily life scenarios. In addition, the consistency of moral judgments made from different standpoints including impartial and situated conditions will also be evaluated. Furthermore, the effect of different background variables on the scores of utilitarian v. justice scale will also be explored. The principle of utilitarianism is to maximize the collective utility so that the differences between benefits and costs are optimized. By contrast, the principle of justice emphasizes that the basic rights of individuals should be protected even in face of tremendous majority utility. The empirical data revealed that college students in general tend to be more utilitarian-oriented in terms of overall performance on the utilitarian v. justice scale. Whether subjects will make utilitarian or justice response may depend on the scale and amount of utility and the nature of basic rights involved in the dilemmas. Subjects tended to make more justice-oriented response when they are in the impartial or objective condition. In contrast, subjects tended to make more utilitarian-oriented response when they are situated in the standpoint of decision makers. Gender, education, partisan orientation, and engagement in civil activities were the important background variables which are significantly correlated with the scores on the utilitarian v. justice scale.
Books on the topic "Utilitarian reasoning"
van Prooijen, Jan-Willem. Reason or Intuition? Oxford University Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190609979.003.0003.
Full textHellman, Samuel. Medical Ethics and Learning. Oxford University Press, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/med/9780190650551.003.0002.
Full textBesson, Samantha. Human Rights in Relation. Oxford University Press, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198795957.003.0002.
Full textBook chapters on the topic "Utilitarian reasoning"
Präntare, Fredrik, Mattias Tiger, David Bergström, Herman Appelgren, and Fredrik Heintz. "Towards Utilitarian Combinatorial Assignment with Deep Neural Networks and Heuristic Algorithms." In Trustworthy AI - Integrating Learning, Optimization and Reasoning, 104–11. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-73959-1_10.
Full textFrancis, John G., and Leslie P. Francis. "Fairness in the Use of Information About Carriers of Resistant Infections." In Ethics and Drug Resistance: Collective Responsibility for Global Public Health, 243–56. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-27874-8_15.
Full textBeveridge, Craig. "Utilitarian History." In Recovering Scottish History, 97–114. Edinburgh University Press, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.3366/edinburgh/9781474491464.003.0005.
Full textBobek, Michal. "Comparative Reasoning by Courts: Some Classical Points Revisited." In Comparative Reasoning in European Supreme Courts. Oxford University Press, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199680382.003.0014.
Full textGerrits, Jeroen. "Conflicting Modes of Moral Reasoning; The Case of 24." In 24 heures chrono, naissance du genre sécuritaire ? Librairie Philosophique J. Vrin, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.53984/philoseries08299.
Full textSverdlik, Steven. "Bentham’s Chapter IV." In Bentham's An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation, C4—C4P62. Oxford University Press, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190089900.003.0005.
Full textPostema, Gerald J. "Publicity and the Development of Bentham’s Theory of Value." In Utility, Publicity, and Law, 72–93. Oxford University Press, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198793175.003.0004.
Full textSalvano-Pardieu, Veronique, Leïla Oubrahim, and Steve Kilpatrick. "Cognitive Structure of Moral Reasoning, Development, and Evolution With Age and Pathology." In Advances in Religious and Cultural Studies, 30–57. IGI Global, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-1811-3.ch002.
Full textPostema, Gerald J. "Afterword." In Bentham and the Common Law Tradition, 456–98. Oxford University Press, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198793052.003.0014.
Full textHilty, Reto M., Jörg Hoffmann, and Stefan Scheuerer. "Intellectual Property Justification for Artificial Intelligence." In Artificial Intelligence and Intellectual Property, 50–72. Oxford University Press, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198870944.003.0004.
Full textConference papers on the topic "Utilitarian reasoning"
Huang, Xiaowei, and Ji Ruan. "ATL Strategic Reasoning Meets Correlated Equilibrium." In Twenty-Sixth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. California: International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence Organization, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.24963/ijcai.2017/153.
Full text