Academic literature on the topic 'Uruguay Round'
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Uruguay Round.'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Journal articles on the topic "Uruguay Round"
Harrison, Glenn W., Thomas F. Rutherford, and David G. Tarr. "Quantifying the Uruguay Round." Economic Journal 107, no. 444 (September 1, 1997): 1405–30. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0297.1997.tb00055.x.
Full textCline, William R. "Evaluating the Uruguay Round." World Economy 18, no. 1 (January 1995): 1–23. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9701.1995.tb00198.x.
Full textNguyen, Trien, Carlo Perroni, and Randall Wigle. "A Uruguay Round Success?" World Economy 18, no. 1 (January 1995): 25–30. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9701.1995.tb00199.x.
Full textBrittan, Leon. "Guest Editorial: Uruguay Round." Common Market Law Review 31, Issue 2 (April 1, 1994): 229–34. http://dx.doi.org/10.54648/cola1994015.
Full textStreeten, Paul. "The Uruguay Round: an assessment." International Affairs 71, no. 3 (July 1995): 613–14. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2624875.
Full textHindley, Brian. "Agriculture in the Uruguay Round." International Affairs 70, no. 3 (July 1994): 553–54. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2623752.
Full textNguyen, Trien T., Carlo Perroni, and Randall M. Wigle. "Uruguay round Impacts on Canada." Canadian Public Policy / Analyse de Politiques 22, no. 4 (December 1996): 342. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3551453.
Full textMbirimi, Ivan. "Zimbabwe in the Uruguay Round." Development Policy Review 9, no. 1 (March 1991): 5–28. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7679.1991.tb00172.x.
Full textGreenaway, David. "The Uruguay Round: An Assessment." Economic Journal 107, no. 440 (January 1, 1997): 232–33. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ej/107.440.232.
Full textMcCulloch, Rachel. "Services and the Uruguay Round." World Economy 13, no. 3 (June 28, 2008): 329–48. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9701.1990.tb00599.x.
Full textDissertations / Theses on the topic "Uruguay Round"
Mamaty, Isabelle. "L'Uruguay round et l'Afrique subsaharienne : les conséquences de l'accord agricole." Paris 10, 1998. http://www.theses.fr/1998PA100002.
Full textHowe, Valerie J. (Valerie Josephine) Carleton University Dissertation Canadian Studies. "Canada at the Uruguay Round: regulating the information economy." Ottawa, 1991.
Find full textMancini, Cláudia. "O agronegócio e as negociações comerciais internacionais: uma análise da ação coletiva do setor privado." Universidade de São Paulo, 2008. http://www.teses.usp.br/teses/disponiveis/8/8131/tde-03122008-123146/.
Full textThis research discusses the evolution of the efforts made by the private sector of the Brazilian agribusiness to defend its agenda of liberalization of international markets. It is especially focused on the period between the Uruguay Round (1986-1994) of the General Agreement on Trade and Tariffs (Gatt) and on the Doha Round (since 2001) of the World Trade Organization (WTO). The aim of this research is to analyse how the increase in the international competitiveness of the Brazilian agribusiness in the last few decades has affected the private sector interest in elaborating an offensive agenda. In addition, it is our purpose to indicate how this interest has generated collective actions by the private sector. Collective action can be understood as the action by a group of individuals, or just one individual, who are interested in reaching a collective good. The characteristics of this collective good are primarily the jointness of supply, meaning that an individual who has access to that good will not diminish the amount available to another individual, and non-excludibility, meaning that all the individuals of the group will have access to that good. Organizations are the mainly way to reach the collective goods. Associations that represent agribusiness firms are the objects of study in this research. The analysis will be made on two types of associations: those that represent different segments of the agribusiness and those that represent one segment of the agribusiness. Due to the strong competitiveness of the Brazilian agribusiness, the discussion will be concentrated on the actions taken by the players with an agenda demanding higher trade liberalization. This study indicates that after the restructure of the agribusiness in the late 80s and in the 90s, with the end of the heavy state intervention in the sector and the trade liberalization of the country, part of the agribusiness faced the challenge of modernisation and looked for new markets abroad. The result was a diversification of the products exported and the continuous expansion of the exports. Such diversification and increase in the exports added new players to the group formed by those interested in the liberalization of international markets, including the reduction of protectionist barriers against Brazilian products. In the last few years Brazil has participated in a number of international trade negotiations with the aim to put pressure on the reduction of those barriers. From an incipient organization to participate in the Uruguay Round, the private sector headed for a higher technical understanding of the international obstacles to its products and the possible solutions to open more markets. This resulted in it being also better organized to defend its agenda in the negotiations occurred during the 90s and the beginning of this century, such as the Doha Round. One of the conclusions of this study is that the private sector movement was made by collective actions organized by those associations representative of specific segments of the agribusiness, which are seen by the private sector as the main channel to articulate their interests, when compared to associations that represent different segments of the agribusiness, such as the Confederation of Agriculture and Livestock of Brasil (CNA), the official representative of the sector. This indicates that small groups are more successful in mobilizing a collective action than large groups. However, there is an heterogeneity inside those associations that represent one specific segment, with members of different sizes, different interests and different resources. The members more interested in the collective good and with more resources to provide it form a critical mass that seems to better explain the movements of the small groups
Abdel, Karim Imad. "The impact of the Uruguay round agreement on agriculture on Sudan's agricultural trade /." Aachen : Shaker, 2002. http://www.gbv.de/dms/zbw/356661741.pdf.
Full textSteinberg, David Charles. "Why Hollywood lost the Uruguay Round : the political economy of mass communication revisited." Thesis, London School of Economics and Political Science (University of London), 1999. http://etheses.lse.ac.uk/1568/.
Full textOtradovsky, Miranda. "Liberalizing non-tariff barriers : a comparative study of the 1948-58 intra-European trade liberalization and negotiations in the Uruguay round /." Genève : M. Otradovsky, 1992. http://catalogue.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/cb35586046b.
Full textSouza, Lylas Ameyo de. "Les blocs commerciaux regionaux et leurs incidences sur le commerce international." Reims, 1999. http://www.theses.fr/1999REIMD008.
Full textWiener, Jarrod. "Making rules for agriculture in the Uruguay round of the GATT : a study in international leadership." Thesis, University of Kent, 1994. http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.359425.
Full textFerchichi, Mehdi. "L'Uruguay Round et le règlement des différends commerciaux interétatiques." Paris 1, 1996. http://www.theses.fr/1996PA010297.
Full textThe disputes settlement system established in the 1947 GATT agreement has permitted, since its creation, to resolve many commercial disputes. However, its application appeared not enough judicial to be binding upon the contracting parties and many deficiencies allowed the parties to the dispute to paralyze the procedure at different levels. Uruguay round's negotiations have remedied to these weaknesses in establishing in the dispute settlement understanding a more legalistic, automatic and binding system, which will with the creation of appellate body bring respect towards the rule of law in commercial international relations. This new system will work in a genuine international organization : the WTO, in which the members, specially the more important ones, officially engaged themselves to respect the dispute settlement body's decisions and to favour multilateralism in world commercial exchange at the beginning of the 21st century
Bardouille, Nand Cecil. "Managing technological transformation in the developing countries, lessons from east Asia and challenges from the Uruguay round." Thesis, National Library of Canada = Bibliothèque nationale du Canada, 1998. http://www.collectionscanada.ca/obj/s4/f2/dsk2/ftp01/MQ33835.pdf.
Full textBooks on the topic "Uruguay Round"
Jackson, John Howard. Implementing the Uruguay Round. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1997.
Find full textMorrison, A. Uruguay round and the GATT. [S.L.]: [S.N.], 1988.
Find full textSchott, Jeffrey J. The Uruguay round: An assessment. Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics, 1994.
Find full textCanada. External Affairs and International Trade Canada. Uruguay Round Agreements: media highlights. Ottawa: External Affairs and International Trade Canada, 1993.
Find full textHoekman, Bernard M. Egypt and the Uruguay Round. Washington, DC: World Bank, Europe and Central Asia, and Middle East and North Africa Technical Dept., Private Sector and Finance Team, 1996.
Find full textIngersent, K. A., A. J. Rayner, and R. C. Hine, eds. Agriculture in the Uruguay Round. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 1994. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-23123-2.
Full textBhagwati, Jagdish, and Mathias Hirsch, eds. The Uruguay Round and Beyond. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 1998. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-10413-2.
Full textWhalley, John, ed. The Uruguay Round and Beyond. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 1989. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-20110-5.
Full textKartadjoemena, H. S. GATT, WTO, dan hasil Uruguay round. Jakarta: Penerbit Universitas Indonesia, 1997.
Find full textGeneral Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (Organisation). Multilateral trade negotiations: The Uruguay round. Geneva: GATT, 1989.
Find full textBook chapters on the topic "Uruguay Round"
Josling, Timothy E., Stefan Tangermann, and T. K. Warley. "The Uruguay Round Negotiations." In Agriculture in the GATT, 133–74. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 1996. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9780230378902_7.
Full textSutherland, Peter D. "Globalisation and the Uruguay Round." In The Uruguay Round and Beyond, 143–53. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 1998. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-10413-2_9.
Full textWhalley, John. "Introduction." In The Uruguay Round and Beyond, 1–6. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 1989. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-20110-5_1.
Full textWhalley, John. "The System, the Players and the Issue of Participation in the Uruguay Round and Beyond." In The Uruguay Round and Beyond, 7–14. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 1989. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-20110-5_2.
Full textWhalley, John. "Developed and Developing Country Perspectives on the Trading System Leading up to the Uruguay Round." In The Uruguay Round and Beyond, 15–29. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 1989. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-20110-5_3.
Full textWhalley, John. "Recent Changes in the Trading System and the Opportunities they Create in the Uruguay Round." In The Uruguay Round and Beyond, 31–44. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 1989. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-20110-5_4.
Full textWhalley, John. "Strategies for Developing Countries in the Uruguay Round and Beyond." In The Uruguay Round and Beyond, 45–76. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 1989. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-20110-5_5.
Full textWhalley, John. "Broadening the System." In The Uruguay Round and Beyond, 77–82. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 1989. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-20110-5_6.
Full textWhalley, John. "Summary and Concluding Remarks." In The Uruguay Round and Beyond, 83–84. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 1989. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-20110-5_7.
Full textDelamuraz, Jean-Pascal. "Arthur Dunkel." In The Uruguay Round and Beyond, 3–6. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 1998. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-10413-2_1.
Full textConference papers on the topic "Uruguay Round"
Kim, Jong Deog, and Sung Gwi Kim. "Evaluation and Prospect on Comprehensive Fishing-Village Development Project in the Republic of Korea." In ASME 2003 22nd International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering. ASMEDC, 2003. http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/omae2003-37333.
Full textFerro, Santiago, Pablo Rodríguez, Juan Tomasini, Pablo Gristo, Natalia Blánquez, Bruno Conti, Cecilia Romeu, and Josefina Marmisolle. "Minimum Economic Field Size and Probability of Success of Conventional Hydrocarbon Discoveries, in the Light of the New Open Uruguay Round Framework." In SPE Latin American and Caribbean Petroleum Engineering Conference. Society of Petroleum Engineers, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/199069-ms.
Full textNesmachnow, S., and A. Tchernykh. "Affinity multiprocessor scheduling considering communications and synchronizations using a Multiobjective Iterated Local Search algorithm." In 1st International Workshop on Advanced Information and Computation Technologies and Systems 2020. Crossref, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.47350/aicts.2020.14.
Full textWAELBROECK, JEAN, JEAN MARC BURNIAUX, and MONCEF HADHRI. "SOME GENERAL EQUILIBRIUM MODEL ESTIMATES OF THE IMPACT OF THE URUGUAY ROUND AND OF THE “1992” PROCESS IN THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITY ON THE NEWLY INDUSTRIALIZED COUNTRIES OF EAST ASIA." In Proceedings of the Economic Development of ROC and the Pacific Rim in the 1990s and Beyond. WORLD SCIENTIFIC, 1994. http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/9789814440998_0012.
Full textReports on the topic "Uruguay Round"
Anderson, James. The Uruguay Round and Welfare in Some Distorted Agricultural Economies. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research, February 1997. http://dx.doi.org/10.3386/w5923.
Full textZumwalt, James P. Pressure Politics and Free Trade: Influence of the Services Industry on the Uruguay Round. Fort Belvoir, VA: Defense Technical Information Center, December 1997. http://dx.doi.org/10.21236/ada442438.
Full textHayami, Yujiro, and Yoshihisa Godo. Economics and Politics of Rice Policy in Japan: A Perspective on the Uruguay Round. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research, November 1995. http://dx.doi.org/10.3386/w5341.
Full textHamilton, Colleen, and John Whalley. Coalitions in the Uruguay Round: The Extent, Pros and Cons of Developing Country Participation 1,2. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research, October 1988. http://dx.doi.org/10.3386/w2751.
Full textLettington, Robert J. L. Small-scale Agriculture and the Nutritional Safeguard under Article 8(1) of the Uruguay Round Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights. Geneva, Switzerland: International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development, 2003. http://dx.doi.org/10.7215/ip_wp_20031101.
Full text