Academic literature on the topic 'Urban common'
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Urban common.'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Journal articles on the topic "Urban common"
Colding, Johan, Stephan Barthel, Pim Bendt, Robbert Snep, Wim van der Knaap, and Henrik Ernstson. "Urban green commons: Insights on urban common property systems." Global Environmental Change 23, no. 5 (October 2013): 1039–51. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.05.006.
Full textWebb, Dan. "Urban Common Property." Radical Philosophy Review 17, no. 2 (2014): 371–94. http://dx.doi.org/10.5840/radphilrev20131291.
Full textOkulicz-Kozaryn, Adam, and Rubia R. Valente. "Urban unhappiness is common." Cities 118 (November 2021): 103368. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2021.103368.
Full textCzornik, Małgorzata. "Creators of urban common goods." Studia Miejskie, no. 28 (2017): 45–58. http://dx.doi.org/10.25167/sm2017.028.03.
Full textFerreri, Mara. "Common spaces of urban emancipation." Housing Studies 35, no. 3 (February 27, 2020): 567–68. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02673037.2020.1727631.
Full textKapsali, Matina, and Maria Karagianni. "Book review: Common Space: The City as Commons." Urban Studies 54, no. 11 (June 21, 2017): 2674–77. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0042098017713556.
Full textGuo, Weisi. "Common statistical patterns in urban terrorism." Royal Society Open Science 6, no. 9 (September 25, 2019): 190645. http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsos.190645.
Full textRamsay, Sarah. "C neoformans common in urban children." Lancet 357, no. 9267 (May 2001): 1507. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(00)04709-7.
Full textMarella, Maria Rosaria. "The Law of the Urban Common(s)." South Atlantic Quarterly 118, no. 4 (October 1, 2019): 877–93. http://dx.doi.org/10.1215/00382876-7825672.
Full textRyabev, A. A., and V. S. Salii. "Recreation and Urban Tourism: A Common Problem and the Prospect for Solving." Business Inform 11, no. 526 (2021): 205–10. http://dx.doi.org/10.32983/2222-4459-2021-11-205-210.
Full textDissertations / Theses on the topic "Urban common"
Eymann, Jutta. "Management of urban common brushtail possums (Trichosurus vulpecula)." Doctoral thesis, Australia : Macquarie University, 2007. http://hdl.handle.net/1959.14/6.
Full textThesis (PhD)--Macquarie University, Division of Environmental and Life Sciences, Department of Biological Sciences.
Includes bibliographical references.
Preface -- Management issues of urban common brushtail possums (Trichosurus vulpecula): a loved or hated neighbour -- Effects of deslorelin implants on reproduction in the common brushtail possum (Trichosurus vulpecula) -- Brushtail possums (Trichosurus vulpecula) in metropolotan Sydney: population biology and response to contraceptive implants -- Strategic survey for Toxoplasma gondii and Neospora caninum in the common brushtail possum (Trichosurus vulpecula) from urban Sydney, Australia -- Leptospirosis serology in the common brushtail possum (Trichosurus vulpecula) from urban Sydney, Australia -- Conclusions.
The common brushtail possum (Trichosurus vulpecula) is indeed a common inhabitant of many Australian citites, and one of the few marsupials that has adapted well to the urban environment. Their close proximity to people provides a great opportunity to experience native wildlife in the backyard, however, their utilization of house roofs, bold behaviour and appetite for garden plants often leads to conflict with householders. Population numbers are sufficiently high to require ongoing management to minimise negative impacts for humans and brushtail possums alike in a socially acceptable manner. The aim of this thesis was to identify current management issues and address the need for improved and novel management strategies. The potential of slow-release implants, containing the GnRH agonist deslorelin, as a contraceptive agent for brushtail possums was tested on a captive population. Males appeared resistant to treatment, but deslorelin was found to inhibit reproduction in female brushtail possums for at least one breeding season, making it a promising tool to control fertility in some wild populations. A further aim was to trial deslorelin implants on a wild urban population, to collect more information about the urban biology of this species and to point out issues which have previously not been addressed. Close proximity and interaction of urban brushtail possums with humans and their domestic animals can increase the risk of disease exposure and transmission and influence the health of wild populations. Serosurveys showed that animals were readily exposed to Leptospira spp. and Toxoplasma gondii. This thesis also provides the first data on brushtail possum dispersal in urban areas, knowledge which is highly relevant to the development of management strategies such as fertility control. The findings from this research broaden our knowledge about urban brushtail possums and should assist wildlife authorities in developing alternative or improved management procedures.
Mode of access: World Wide Web.
xxv, 287 p. ill., maps
ESOPI, GIULIA. "URBAN COMMON Elementi teorici e strumenti pianificatori per una nuova lettura dei servizi urbani." Doctoral thesis, Università degli studi di Pavia, 2019. http://hdl.handle.net/11571/1263406.
Full textThe contemporary urban studies debate intends the city as an open complex system that interacts with the environment and other cities creating a complex global network. At the same time, the city is subject to continuous and rapid changes that generate instability conditions making it fragile. The institutions, responsible for sustainable development of territories, struggle to deal with these phenomena generating situations of inefficiency and poor functioning of city system and its parts. For example, the difficulty of institutions to manage the territory is represented in static and rigid space arrangements of a fluid system. These situations cause the misuse/under-use of spaces and services by society and the dissatisfaction of city users needs. In an attempt to fill the gap left by public actors, community initiatives are emerging from below aimed to shape urban space creating new opportunities for community use. These are forms of collaboration and cooperation among different individuals that take responsibility for urban resources by satisfying both collective and individual needs. They are social resilience experiences, or rather actions-reactions by individuals that represent alternatives to traditional planning. The social component abilities (reactive, adaptive and proactive) increase the quality of urban system in terms of enhancement, sustainability and attractiveness. From these interactions among physical elements and individuals, new forms of wealth are generated as urban commons. The present research refers to alternative methods related to planning and design processes of urban spaces and wonders how local planning can ensure, within urban services topic, the initiatives and actions of citizens aimed to adapt spatial urban resources to community needs. It defines a specific typology of urban commons, city resources shared by a heterogeneous group of individuals. In particular, the research focuses on three objectives: two theoretical (the investigation of urban commons features and the comparison with urban services in the Italian context, in particular Lombardia region) and one applicative (the analysis of urban commons distribution in a real context, the city of Segrate - MI).
ESOPI, GIULIA. "URBAN COMMON Elementi teorici e strumenti pianificatori per una nuova lettura dei servizi urbani." Doctoral thesis, Università degli studi di Pavia, 2019. http://hdl.handle.net/11571/1263426.
Full textThe contemporary urban studies debate intends the city as an open complex system that interacts with the environment and other cities creating a complex global network. At the same time, the city is subject to continuous and rapid changes that generate instability conditions making it fragile. The institutions, responsible for sustainable development of territories, struggle to deal with these phenomena generating situations of inefficiency and poor functioning of city system and its parts. For example, the difficulty of institutions to manage the territory is represented in static and rigid space arrangements of a fluid system. These situations cause the misuse/under-use of spaces and services by society and the dissatisfaction of city users needs. In an attempt to fill the gap left by public actors, community initiatives are emerging from below aimed to shape urban space creating new opportunities for community use. These are forms of collaboration and cooperation among different individuals that take responsibility for urban resources by satisfying both collective and individual needs. They are social resilience experiences, or rather actions-reactions by individuals that represent alternatives to traditional planning. The social component abilities (reactive, adaptive and proactive) increase the quality of urban system in terms of enhancement, sustainability and attractiveness. From these interactions among physical elements and individuals, new forms of wealth are generated as urban commons. The present research refers to alternative methods related to planning and design processes of urban spaces and wonders how local planning can ensure, within urban services topic, the initiatives and actions of citizens aimed to adapt spatial urban resources to community needs. It defines a specific typology of urban commons, city resources shared by a heterogeneous group of individuals. In particular, the research focuses on three objectives: two theoretical (the investigation of urban commons features and the comparison with urban services in the Italian context, in particular Lombardia region) and one applicative (the analysis of urban commons distribution in a real context, the city of Segrate - MI).
ESOPI, GIULIA. "URBAN COMMON Elementi teorici e strumenti pianificatori per una nuova lettura dei servizi urbani." Doctoral thesis, Università degli studi di Pavia, 2019. http://hdl.handle.net/11571/1263386.
Full textThe contemporary urban studies debate intends the city as an open complex system that interacts with the environment and other cities creating a complex global network. At the same time, the city is subject to continuous and rapid changes that generate instability conditions making it fragile. The institutions, responsible for sustainable development of territories, struggle to deal with these phenomena generating situations of inefficiency and poor functioning of city system and its parts. For example, the difficulty of institutions to manage the territory is represented in static and rigid space arrangements of a fluid system. These situations cause the misuse/under-use of spaces and services by society and the dissatisfaction of city users needs. In an attempt to fill the gap left by public actors, community initiatives are emerging from below aimed to shape urban space creating new opportunities for community use. These are forms of collaboration and cooperation among different individuals that take responsibility for urban resources by satisfying both collective and individual needs. They are social resilience experiences, or rather actions-reactions by individuals that represent alternatives to traditional planning. The social component abilities (reactive, adaptive and proactive) increase the quality of urban system in terms of enhancement, sustainability and attractiveness. From these interactions among physical elements and individuals, new forms of wealth are generated as urban commons. The present research refers to alternative methods related to planning and design processes of urban spaces and wonders how local planning can ensure, within urban services topic, the initiatives and actions of citizens aimed to adapt spatial urban resources to community needs. It defines a specific typology of urban commons, city resources shared by a heterogeneous group of individuals. In particular, the research focuses on three objectives: two theoretical (the investigation of urban commons features and the comparison with urban services in the Italian context, in particular Lombardia region) and one applicative (the analysis of urban commons distribution in a real context, the city of Segrate - MI).
Brodie, Ian. "Investigation of stormwater particles generated from common urban surfaces." University of Southern Queensland, Faculty of Engineering and Surveying, 2007. http://eprints.usq.edu.au/archive/00003558/.
Full textJohnson, Julie M. "The common greenway and the establishment of park character." Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1988. http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/74794.
Full textLoustau, Jeffrey J. (Jeffrey Justin). "Common ground--the promise of mixed-income/mixed-use development." Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1991. http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/13419.
Full textBelanger, Rachel (Rachel Anne). "Developing common wealth : workspaces for innovation and entrepreneurship in Massachusetts." Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2017. http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/111362.
Full textCataloged from PDF version of thesis.
Includes bibliographical references (pages 64-70).
Over the last two decades, Boston and Cambridge have generated some of the strongest and most celebrated innovation districts - Kendall Square and the Seaport District - in which new models of commercial and civic real estate support dense webs of relationships among high-growth companies, academia, investors, mentors, and corporate R&D. Although beneficial for the overall competitiveness of the region, the wealth generated by these start-up and tech communities is not broadly shared, and the Commonwealth of Massachusetts's economic development policy, Opportunities for All, has focused on reducing disparities across the state. Meanwhile, the state's Gateway Cities present persistent challenges with lower than average incomes and weak market conditions for real estate development. Since 2014, MassDevelopment's Transformative Development Initiative (TDI) has focused the state's investment in Gateway Cities on projects intended to generate follow-on private investment, including TDI Cowork grants for "collaborative workspaces," broadly defined. In an effort to support communities of entrepreneurs across the state, TDI Cowork expanded into a state-wide Collaborative Workspaces Program in 2016. Despite this interest in using community-oriented workspaces to catalyze new economic opportunities, policymakers, developers, and other economic development professionals in Massachusetts lack a comprehensive picture of what spaces are currently available that aim to support innovation and entrepreneurship. A new inventory of workspaces utilized three categories from a previous list of innovation assets and found 50 "coworking spaces," 51 "innovation centers," and 20 "maker spaces." Of the 121 spaces, approximately 70 opened in the last three years and several others are expected to open in 2017. Survey data showed that spaces in Boston, Cambridge, and Somerville differ from those in the rest of the state in several ways that are significant for stakeholders aiming to catalyze economic development, including a higher portion serving startup teams, providing access to corporate partners and investors, and supporting members/users of digital products versus creative or professional services. Further analysis of the innovation ecosystem in Worcester suggested opportunities to attract mid-stage start-ups and mid-career entrepreneurs rather than focusing on undergraduate student retention as an economic development strategy.
by Rachel Belanger.
M.C.P.
Sjöland, Kozlovic Martina. "Renovation for the Common Benefit? : On Urban Restructuring and Displacement Pressure." Thesis, Malmö universitet, Institutionen för Urbana Studier (US), 2021. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:mau:diva-45279.
Full textFraser, Madeline C. (Madeline del Carmen) 1973. "From needs to action : community organizing at Heritage Common, Lawrence, Massachusetts." Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2000. http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/9039.
Full textIncludes bibliographical references (leaves 71-72).
This is a study of the effect researchers and their methods have on the process of community organizing. It specifically focuses on Heritage Common, a subsidized housing development in Lawrence, Massachusetts with a population comprised of 81% Latino residents. A survey on the social service needs of the residents was conducted for the owner and management company, The Community Builders (TCB). During the survey process, the residents of Heritage Common voiced their desire to organize a Tenants' Committee that would be formally recognized by the management and have a say in the future of their community. The project started as a social services needs assessment and became a community organizing case study with an interest in the role of the researcher and the research methods as catalysts in the process. The results of the survey were used to inform the residents about which groups within the community as well as which social services could be identified as targets for organizing efforts. This project was begun in October 1999, and as of May 2000, Heritage Common has established a formal Tenants' Committee. The first meeting between management, the Tenants' Committee and the residents to address community concerns will be held on May 18, 2000.
by Madeline C. Fraser.
M.C.P.
Books on the topic "Urban common"
Common space: Urban design experience. Trento]: LISt Lab, 2018.
Find full textIndian Institute of Public Administration. Centre for Urban Studies, ed. Urban infrastructure for the common man. New Delhi: Centre for Urban Studies, Indian Institute of Public Administration, 2011.
Find full textConsultancy, MVA, Institute for Transport Studies, Oscar Faber TPA, and Birmingham (England) City Council, eds. Common appraisal framework for urban transport projects. [Birmingham: Birmingham City Council], 1994.
Find full textHeritage as common(s), common(s) as heritage. Gothenburg: Makadam Publishers, 2015.
Find full textAydas, Muharrem. Vesterbro: National difference and common dilemmas. Esbjerg: South Jutland University Press, 1997.
Find full textJ, Iannuzzi Timothy, ed. A common tragedy: History of an urban river. Amherst, Mass: Amherst Scientific Publishers, 2002.
Find full textGill, Walter. A common sense guide to non-traditional urban education. Nashville, Tenn: James C. Winston Publishing Co., Inc., 1998.
Find full textWeightman, Daniel Mark. Conceptualizing common grounds: An urban parks study in Birmingham. Birmingham: University of Birmingham, 1997.
Find full textKendrick, Martyn. Re-inventing our common future: An exploration into community sustainability. Hamilton, Ont: Eco Gateway, 1995.
Find full textUnited States. Forest Service. Southern Region. Wildland/urban interface: Searching for common ground : integrated resource management. Atlanta, Ga: U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southern Region, 1992.
Find full textBook chapters on the topic "Urban common"
Tanner, Ken. "Urban Legends, Conspiracies, and Other Perversions of the Truth." In Common Sense, 59–79. Berkeley, CA: Apress, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4302-4153-9_5.
Full textCheung, Paul. "Common Tongue and Urban Membership." In Statecraft in Symbols, 101–27. Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-3319-6_4.
Full textAbidi, Abdelhamid. "Transport and environmental regulation – common attitudes and social change." In Urban Environment, 3–13. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2540-9_1.
Full textKeremane, Ganesh. "Urban Wastewater Reuse—A Common Reality." In Governance of Urban Wastewater Reuse for Agriculture, 9–22. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-55056-5_2.
Full textZuo, Jiping. "Diverse Roles, A Common Dilemma." In Work and Family in Urban China, 119–38. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-55465-9_7.
Full textShamova, Ekaterina. "Walking Together: Towards a Common Movement." In Experiential Walks for Urban Design, 115–39. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-76694-8_7.
Full textKioupkiolis, Alexandros. "Italian Paths to Urban Commoning." In Common Hegemony, Populism, and the New Municipalism, 179–208. New York: Routledge, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781003264668-8.
Full textKaestle, Carl F. "Common Schools before the “Common School Revival”: New York Schooling in the 1790s." In Urban Education in the United States, 17–36. New York: Palgrave Macmillan US, 2005. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9781403981875_2.
Full textCacciatore, Francesca, Rita Maralla, and Martina Riccio. "Inhabiting an “Un-common” Space: Health Promotion in the Area of Pescarola, Bologna." In Urban Health, 73–92. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49446-9_7.
Full textCampbell-Whatley, Gloria D., Keonya Booker, Derrick Robinson, and Bettie Butler. "Children in Urban Centers." In A School Leader’s Guide to Implementing the Common Core, 84–100. New York, NY : Routledge, 2016.: Routledge, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781315769868-6.
Full textConference papers on the topic "Urban common"
Zaninović, Tamara, and Bojana Bojanić Obad Šćitaroci. "Integration core and historic urban layers relation - using space syntax for city comparison." In Common Foundations 2017. University of Zagreb Faculty of Civil Engineering, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.5592/co/zt.2017.35.
Full textSeow, K. L., M. Doya, X. Briottet, R. Ceolato, N. Riviere, and S. K. Pang. "Spectral BRDF of common urban materials." In 2012 4th Workshop on Hyperspectral Image and Signal Processing: Evolution in Remote Sensing (WHISPERS). IEEE, 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/whispers.2012.6874250.
Full textMane, Ogri. "Informal Urban Development – Case of Albania." In The 5th Human and Social Sciences at the Common Conference. Publishing Society, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.18638/hassacc.2017.5.1.235.
Full textContin, Antonella, Patrizia Giordano, and Valentina Galiulo. "Ragusa Ibla_S. Paolo neighbourhood: regeneration cultural common." In Post-Oil City Planning for Urban Green Deals Virtual Congress. ISOCARP, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.47472/umyb6761.
Full textSchwarz, Andrew, Colleen Schwarz, and Tracey Rizzuto. "Examining the Urban Legend of Common Method Bias: Nine Common Errors and Their Impact." In 2008 41st Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. IEEE, 2008. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/hicss.2008.155.
Full textLeković, Milica. "Urbanismo del miedo y representacion distópica de las ciudades." In Seminario Internacional de Investigación en Urbanismo. Barcelona: Facultad de Arquitectura. Universidad de la República, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.5821/siiu.6143.
Full textNisic, Dragana, Dinko Knezevic, Aleksandra Petkovic, Milica Ignjatovic, and Jovana Kostadinovic. "Study of general environmental awareness of the urban population." In The 4th Human and Social Sciences at the Common Conference. Publishing Society, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.18638/hassacc.2016.4.1.201.
Full textVelesaca, Henry O., Patricia L. Suárez, Angel D. Sappa, Dario Carpio, Rafael E. Rivadeneira, and Angel Sanchez. "Review on Common Techniques for Urban Environment Video Analytics." In Workshop Brasileiro de Cidades Inteligentes. Sociedade Brasileira de Computação - SBC, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.5753/wbci.2022.223096.
Full textSousa Matos, Rute, Rita Calhau, and Alexandre Lisboa. "Greenways – an alternative mobility structure and an urban development strategy." In The 3rd Human and Social Sciences at the Common Conference. Publishing Society, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.18638/hassacc.2015.3.1.160.
Full textCabrera-Barona, Pablo. "From the ‘Good Living’ to the ‘Common Good’: What is the role of GIScience?" In 2017 Joint Urban Remote Sensing Event (JURSE). IEEE, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/jurse.2017.7924581.
Full textReports on the topic "Urban common"
Lucas, Brian. Urban Flood Risks, Impacts, and Management in Nigeria. Institute of Development Studies (IDS), January 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.19088/k4d.2021.018.
Full textBrandt, Leslie A., Cait Rottler, Wendy S. Gordon, Stacey L. Clark, Lisa O'Donnell, April Rose, Annamarie Rutledge, and Emily King. Vulnerability of Austin’s urban forest and natural areas: A report from the Urban Forestry Climate Change Response Framework. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Northern Forests Climate Hub, October 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.32747/2020.7204069.ch.
Full textГарлицька, Т. С. Substandard Vocabulary in the System of Urban Communication. Криворізький державний педагогічний університет, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.31812/123456789/3912.
Full textEckert, Elizabeth, Eleanor Turner, and Jo Anne Yeager Sallah. Youth Rural-Urban Migration in Bungoma, Kenya: Implications for the Agricultural Workforce. RTI Press, August 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.3768/rtipress.2019.op.0062.1908.
Full textRezaie, Shogofa, Fedra Vanhuyse, Karin André, and Maryna Henrysson. Governing the circular economy: how urban policymakers can accelerate the agenda. Stockholm Environment Institute, September 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.51414/sei2022.027.
Full textAlarcón, Lía, Patricia Alata, Mariana Alegre, Tamara Egger, Rosario Fassina, Analía Hanono, Carolina Huffmann, Lucía Nogales, and Carolina Piedrafita. Citizen-Led Urbanism in Latin America: Superbook of civic actions for transforming cities. Inter-American Development Bank, November 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.18235/0004582.
Full textSaltus, Christina, and Eric Britzke. Literature review : macrohabitat metrics to identify presence of chiroptera on the landscape in the United States. Engineer Research and Development Center (U.S.), September 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.21079/11681/45523.
Full textReis, João. Slaves Who Owned Slaves in Nineteenth-Century Bahia, Brazil. Maria Sibylla Merian International Centre for Advanced Studies in the Humanities and Social Sciences Conviviality-Inequality in Latin America, May 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.46877/reis.2021.36.
Full textDesiderati, Christopher. Carli Creek Regional Water Quality Project: Assessing Water Quality Improvement at an Urban Stormwater Constructed Wetland. Portland State University, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.15760/mem.78.
Full textCedergren, Elin, Diana Huynh, Michael Kull, John Moodie, Hjördís Rut Sigurjónsdóttir, and Mari Wøien Meijer. Public service delivery in the Nordic Region: An exercise in collaborative governance. Nordregio, February 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.6027/pb2021:2.2001-3876.
Full text