Dissertations / Theses on the topic 'Unjust enrichment'
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the top 50 dissertations / theses for your research on the topic 'Unjust enrichment.'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Browse dissertations / theses on a wide variety of disciplines and organise your bibliography correctly.
Shah, Rajiv Eric. "Reasons for unjust enrichment." Thesis, University of Cambridge, 2019. https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/290112.
Full textSeah, Weeliem. "Mistake as an unjust factor : autonomy and unjust enrichment." Thesis, University of Oxford, 2015. https://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:736155ae-db57-4918-a3d9-a30a04fd1ec6.
Full textWebb, Charlie Edward James. "Property, unjust enrichment and restitution." Thesis, London School of Economics and Political Science (University of London), 2008. http://etheses.lse.ac.uk/2316/.
Full textLodder, A. V. M. "Principles of enrichment in the laws of unjust enrichment." Thesis, University of Oxford, 2011. http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.543649.
Full textBaloch, Tariq A. "Unjust enrichment in the contractual context." Thesis, University of Oxford, 2008. http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.491586.
Full textPitel, Stephen George Alexander. "Choice of law for unjust enrichment." Thesis, University of Cambridge, 2002. http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.620484.
Full textO'Dell, Eoin. "Perspectives on property and unjust enrichment." Thesis, University of Cambridge, 2004. http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.616034.
Full textBall, Eli Byron Stuart. "Enrichment at the claimant's expense : attribution rules in unjust enrichment." Thesis, University of Oxford, 2014. http://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:dc066712-fd0c-4d4f-81ad-dfbbb1805acf.
Full textFogliani, Cory. "Unjust enrichment and employee overpayments in Western Australia." Thesis, Fogliani, Cory (2017) Unjust enrichment and employee overpayments in Western Australia. Masters by Research thesis, Murdoch University, 2017. https://researchrepository.murdoch.edu.au/id/eprint/39345/.
Full textScott, Helen. "Unjust enrichment by transfer in South African law : unjust factors or absence of legal ground?" Thesis, University of Oxford, 2005. http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.432142.
Full textDonnelly, John Bede, and mikewood@deakin edu au. "Concepts and principles in unjust enrichment: A comparative study." Deakin University. School of Law, 2004. http://tux.lib.deakin.edu.au./adt-VDU/public/adt-VDU20060816.152421.
Full textDegeling, Simone E. "Victims and carers : liabilities in tort and unjust enrichment." Thesis, University of Oxford, 1998. http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.287541.
Full textBraslow, Norman Taylor. "Legal transplants and change : unjust enrichment law in Japan /." Thesis, Connect to this title online; UW restricted, 1997. http://hdl.handle.net/1773/9622.
Full textGomes, JuÌlio Manuel Vieira. "Restitution, enrichment and change of position : a comparative analysis." Thesis, University of Oxford, 1998. http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.287283.
Full textTamblyn, Nathan Alexander Lloyd. "Pleas of necessity and duress : exploring common issues across crime, tort, unjust enrichment and contract." Thesis, University of Cambridge, 2010. http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.609135.
Full textMoore, Jonathon P. "Restitution from banks." Thesis, University of Oxford, 2000. http://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:8c830a99-6046-4f23-b1b5-9ba3bc14812a.
Full textOch, Frank. "Der strafrechtliche Schutz gegen ungerechtfertigte Vermögensverschiebungen in England und Wales im Vergleich mit dem deutschen Strafrecht /." Frankfurt am Main [u.a.] : Lang, 2004. http://www.gbv.de/dms/spk/sbb/recht/toc/384052991.pdf.
Full textFerreira, Sérgio Ricardo Savi. "A qualificação do lucro da intervenção:responsabilidade civil ou enriquecimento sem causa?" Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, 2010. http://www.bdtd.uerj.br/tde_busca/arquivo.php?codArquivo=2351.
Full textThe present study aims to demonstrate that when someone profits by interfering In: another persons rights without causing damage to the victim, or when the act does cause damage but the benefits so obtained are greater than the damage caused, tort rules alone are not enough, under Brazilian Law, as an efficient sanction for violation of an interest or right that deserves protection. Since the maIn: function of civil liability rules is to redress the damage, or make the victim whole, without an alternative remedy the wrongdoer would keep the benefits wrongfully obtained, fully In: the first case and In: the second case to the extent of the difference between the profits obtained and damages paid to the victim. I aim to show that the problem of benefits wrongfully obtained cannot be solved through tort rules alone, and some proposed measures In: this area, such as expansive interpretation of Article 944, sole paragraph, of the Civil Code, punitive damages and the so-called third method of quantifying damages should be rejected. As an alternative, I propose framing the question of benefits wrongfully obtained withIn: the rules on unjust enrichment, granting the victim the right to claim restitution of benefits obtained by the wrongdoer by interference In: the victims assets or rights. I argue that the transfer of the benefits wrongfully obtained to the victim should be based on a balance of conflicting interests In: light of the Federal Constitution, with special attention to the solidarity principle and on the theory of the juridical allocation of assets. Besides this, I argue that Brazilian law does not require the victim to suffer any kind of damage In: order to apply unjust enrichment rules and that the subsidiarity rule does not prohibit the filing of joint claims, a tort one to remedy the damage (limited to the actual damage caused) and an unjust enrichment one to force restitution of any positive balance that remains with the wrongdoer after payment of damages. Finally, I intend to stimulate discussions on how to quantify the amount of restitution In: these cases and offer some criteria that can guide judges.
Wilmot-Smith, Frederick J. "Failure of condition." Thesis, University of Oxford, 2013. http://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:93ab182a-be71-489a-88e8-1479d9b8efb3.
Full textLeow, Rachel Pei Si. "Companies in private law : attributing acts and knowledge." Thesis, University of Cambridge, 2017. https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/270291.
Full textSuàrez-Baltodano, Pedro. "Intellectual property rights, global competition and transfer of technology : prospects for a global system of innovation rights based on the quasi-contract of unjust enrichment /." Konstanz, 1999. http://deposit.ddb.de/cgi-bin/dokserv?idn=960383956.
Full textSuárez-Baltodano, Pedro. "Intellectual property rights, global competition and transfer of technology prospects for a global system of innovation rights based on the quasi-contract of unjust enrichment /." [S.l. : s.n.], 1999. http://deposit.ddb.de/cgi-bin/dokserv?idn=960383956.
Full textWatt, Ilze Jr. "The consequences of contracts concluded by unassisted minors : a comparative evaluation." Thesis, Stellenbosch : Stellenbosch University, 2012. http://hdl.handle.net/10019.1/71723.
Full textIncludes bibliography
ENGLISH ABSTRACT: It is a general principle of the law of South Africa that an unassisted contract of a minor is unenforceable against the minor. Although it binds the other party, the minor is not bound. The minor will only be bound if the contract is enforced by his guardian, or if the contract is ratified by the child after attaining majority. This implies that the other party is in a rather unfortunate position, since the effectiveness of the contract will remain uncertain until the guardian of the minor decides to enforce or repudiate the contract, or until the minor ratifies it after attaining majority. The other party may not resile from the contract during this interim period. Should it be established that the contract has failed, the question arises to what extent the parties are obliged to return performances made in purported fulfilment of the contract. In terms of the law of South Africa, the prevailing view is that these claims are based on unjustified enrichment. However, the extent of these claims differs. In principle, both parties’ liability will be limited to the amount remaining in its estate, according to the defence of loss of enrichment. But the application of the defence is subject to an exception that does not apply equally to the parties. Had the other party known or should the other party have known that the enrichment was sine causa, yet continued to part with it, he will be held liable for the full enrichment. However, this exception does not apply to the enrichment liability of minors. In other words, whether the minor knew or should have known that the enrichment was sine causa, he would still be allowed to raise the defence of loss of enrichment. Furthermore, the rules applicable to minors’ enrichment liability applies to all minors, and no scope is left to consider the specific circumstances of each minor. It is accepted that there are two competing principles relating to minors’ unassisted contracts. On the one hand, the law must protect the minor from his immaturity and lack of experience. On the other hand, the law must protect the interests of the other party. It will be seen throughout this study that the determination of how to balance these competing principles is not an easy task. The key aim of this thesis is to investigate the principles governing the unwinding of unassisted minors’ contracts in South Africa. A comparison will be made with the principles applied in other legal systems, in order to identify similarities and differences in the approaches and, to establish what underlies the differences in the various approaches. Germany, England and Scotland have been chosen for comparison for various reasons. First, they share some historical roots, and they represent three major legal traditions, namely the civil law, common law and mixed legal systems, of which South Africa also forms part. Secondly, both England and Scotland have experienced recent legislative reform in this regard, which implies that their respective legal systems should be in line with modern tendencies, and consequently they may provide a valuable framework for possible reform in South Africa. In Germany, although mainly regulated by rather older legislation, there have been interesting developments in the determination of consequences of failed contracts. Hellwege has argued that the unwinding of all contracts should be treated similarly, regardless of the unwinding factor. He has also suggested that in order to prevent the accumulation of risk on one party, and to ensure that the risk is placed on the person who is in control of the object, the defence of loss of enrichment should not be available to any party. His reasoning and suggestions is dealt with in more detail in this thesis. This study argues that the current strict approach applied under South African law regarding minors’ unassisted contracts needs to be re-considered. The current approach is dated and is not in line with modern tendencies and legislation. No proper consideration is given to minors’ development into adulthood or personal circumstances of the parties. It is submitted that in the process of re-consideration, some form of acknowledgement must be given to minors’ development towards mature adults. It is submitted that this would be possible by introducing a more flexible approach to regulate the enforceability and unwinding of minors’ unassisted contracts.
AFRIKAANSE OPSOMMING Dit is ‘n algemene beginsel van die Suid-Afrikaanse reg dat ‘n kontrak aangegaan deur ‘n minderjarige sonder die nodige bystand van sy ouer of voog onafdwingbaar is teenoor die minderjarige. Die minderjarige sal slegs gebonde wees indien die kontrak afgedwing word deur sy voog, of indien die minderjarige self die kontrak ratifiseer nadat hy meerderjarig word. Dit impliseer dat die ander party in ‘n ongunstige posisie is, aangesien die werking van die kontrak onseker is totdat die voog besluit om die kontrak af te dwing of te repudieer, of totdat die minderjarige dit ratifiseer nadat hy meerderjarig word. Gedurende hierdie interim periode mag die ander party nie terugtree uit hierdie kontrak nie. Sou dit bepaal word dat die kontrak misluk het, ontstaan die vraag tot watter mate die partye verplig word om prestasies wat reeds gemaak is, terug te gee. In terme van die Suid-Afrikaanse reg is die meerderheidsopinie dat hierdie eise gebaseer is op onregverdige verryking, maar die omvang van die partye se eise verskil. In beginsel is beide partye se aanspreeklikheid beperk tot die bedrag wat steeds in sy boedel beskikbaar is, weens die beskikbaarheid van die verweer van verlies van verryking. Maar die toepassing van die verweer is onderworpe aan ‘n uitsondering wat nie op beide partye geld nie. Indien die ander party geweet het of moes geweet het dat die verryking sine causa was, maar steeds afstand gedoen het van die verryking, sal hy aanspreeklik gehou word vir die volle verryking. Hierdie reel is egter nie van toepassing op die minderjarige se verrykingsaanspreeklikheid nie. Met ander woorde, indien die minderjarige geweet het of moes geweet het dat die verryking sine causa was, en steeds afstand gedoen het van die verryking, sal hy steeds die verweer van verlies van verryking kan opper. Bowendien, die reels van toepassing op minderjariges se verrykingsaanspreeklikheid is van toepassing op alle minderjariges, en geen ruimte word gelaat om die spesifieke omstandighede van elke minderjarige in ag te neem nie. Wanneer ons kontrakte aangegaan deur minderjariges sonder die nodige bystand, oorweeg, word dit algemeen aanvaar dat daar twee kompeterende beginsels van belang is. Aan die een kant moet die reg die minderjarige beskerm teen sy onvolwassenheid en gebrek aan ondervinding. Aan die ander kant moet die reg ook die belange van die ander party beskerm. Dit sal deurlopend in hierdie studie gesien word dat die behoorlike balansering van hierdie twee beginsels nie ‘n maklike taak is nie. Die hoofdoel van hierdie tesis is om die beginsels wat die afdwingbaarheid en ontbinding van minderjariges se kontrakte in Suid-Afrika, wat aangegaan is sonder die nodige bystand van ‘n voog, te ondersoek. ‘n Vergelyking sal getref word met die beginsels wat in ander regstelsels toegepas word, om sodoende die ooreenkomste en verskille te identifiseer, asook om te bepaal wat hierdie verskille onderlê. Duitsland, Engeland en Skotland is gekies as vergelykende jurisdiksies vir verskeie redes, naamlik hulle historiese gebondenheid en die feit dat hulle drie groot regstradisies (die kontinentale regstelsel, die gemenereg en die gemengde regstelsel) verteenwoordig. Bowendien het beide Engeland en Skotland onlangse wetgewende hervorming ondergaan in hierdie sfeer van die reg, wat impliseer dat hierdie regstelsels waarskynlik in lyn sal wees met moderne tendense. Gevolglik kan hulle ‘n waardevolle raamwerk skep waarbinne moontlike hervorming in Suid-Afrika mag plaasvind. Alhoewel Duitsland grotendeels nog deur ouer wetgewing gereguleer word, het dit ook ‘n reeks interessante verwikkelinge ondergaan in die bepaling van die gevolge van kontrakte wat misluk het. Hellwege argumenteer dat die ontbinding van alle kontrakte dieselfde hanteer moet word, ongeag die onderliggende ontbindende faktor. Hy stel ook voor dat om te verhoed dat die risiko op slegs een party geplaas word, en om te verseker dat dit eerder gedra word deur daardie party wat beheer het oor die voorwerp, die verweer van verlies van verryking nie vir enige party beskikbaar moet wees nie. Sy redenering en voorstelle word in meer besonderhede in hierdie studie bespreek. Hierdie studie argumenteer dat die huidige streng benadering wat in Suid-Afrika toegepas word met betrekking tot kontrakte aangegaan deur minderjariges sonder die nodige bystand van ‘n voog, heroorweeg moet word. Die huidige benadering is verouderd en is nie lyn met moderne tendense en wetgewing nie. Bowendien word geen behoorlike oorweging gegee aan minderjariges se ontwikkeling tot volwassenheid nie, en die partye se persoonlike omstandighede word ook nie in ag geneem nie. Daar word argumenteer dat in die proses van heroorweging, ‘n mate van erkenning gegee moet word aan minderjariges se persoonlike ontwikkeling. Daar word verder argumenteer dat ‘n meer buigsame benadering toegepas moet word ten opsigte van die regulering van die afdwingbaarheid en ontbinding van hierdie kontrakte.
楊春華. "不當得利制度在國際私法中的問題研究." Thesis, University of Macau, 2011. http://umaclib3.umac.mo/record=b2537333.
Full textHildebrand, Lucas Fajardo Nunes. "Pressupostos da obrigação de restituir o enriquecimento sem causa no Código Civil brasileiro." Universidade de São Paulo, 2010. http://www.teses.usp.br/teses/disponiveis/2/2131/tde-01082011-154849/.
Full textThe purpose of the present thesis is to unveil the requisites of the obligation based on the law of restitution according to the Brazilian Civil Code. The law of restitution, which has its roots in the Roman law, has been acknowledged in independent Brazil since the 19th century. In spite of the fact that it has not been expressly stated in the Brazilian Civil Code of 1916, the authors throughout the 20th century have recognized the unjust enrichment as an obligation-creating event. Nevertheless, the doctrine under the Civil Code of 1916 was not unanimous regarding the enumeration and the content of the requirements of the restitutionary obligation. In fact, there was a minority that downplayed the requisites of both impoverishment and correlation between the enrichment and the impoverishment in favor of others, i.e., that the enrichment occurs at the plaintiffs expense. The rise of the unjust enrichment as an obligation-creating event had its climax with the publication of the 2002 Brazilian Civil Code. Specifically, its articles 884, 885 and 886 included the phenomenon amidst the source of obligations. Under the new Code, it has been generally assumed that the requisites underlying the unjust enrichment are the presence of an (i) unjust (ii) enrichment (iii) at the plaintiffs expense that (iv) does not compete with an alternative legal remedy (i.e., rule of subsidiarity). The requirements of impoverishment and correlation aforementioned were abandoned by most authors. An adequate answer to the questions regarding the requisites of the restitutionary obligation, however, demands the analysis of the paradigms crystallized in the foreign doctrine, especially of the German and Portuguese legislation. It has been concluded that the paradigm of the categorization of the unjust enrichment has to be adopted. In compliance with this perspective, the requisites underlying the restitutionary obligation have to be investigated pursuant to the different categories, namely the enrichment through transfers, the enrichment through interference and the enrichment through expenditures made by the plaintiff. The requisites of the restitution based on enrichment through transfers are (i) the enrichment in its objective sense that (ii) occurs through the performance of a conscious and goal oriented patrimonial increment in which it is evident (iii) the failure of this particular goal. Importantly, this goal is sought to be assessed objectively from the unilateral manifestation of the performer, in conformity to the good-faith principle. The restitution based on enrichment through interference has as requirements (i) the enrichment in its subjective sense (ii) obtained through the interference with the rights (iii) legally reserved to the plaintiff. Finally, the requirements of the restitution based on enrichment through expenditures made by the plaintiff are (i) the subjective enrichment (ii) that the law forbids and that is originated from (iii) an expense effectuated by the plaintiff. In the particular case of an imposed enrichment, the restitution is constrained to the incontrovertible benefits resulting from the act of the plaintiff. Because the subsidiarity rule does not integrate the fattispecie of the restitutionary obligation, it does not substantiate a requisite by itself. The subsidiarity rule functions rather as a secondary norm that determines the character of lex specialis of the articles 884 and 885 of the Civil Code. Additionally, the subsidiarity rule has a concrete character, i.e., the restitutionary pretensions are only prevented by an alternative legal remedy that offers an effective solution that is identical to the one ensured by the law of restitution.
Crawley, Shaun Edward. "The difference in how UAE and EW law controls Gharar (risk) and so Riba in a construction contract in the Emirate of Dubai, UAE." Thesis, Robert Gordon University, 2017. http://hdl.handle.net/10059/2453.
Full textLeite, Adriano Pugliesi. "O enriquecimento sem causa no código civil brasileiro." Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo, 2008. https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/8344.
Full textThe unjust enrichment in the Brazilian Civil Code is viewed as a source of obligations and a principle of Civil Law. The Civil Code of 2002 defined the term of unjust enrichment, in an innovative and autonomous manner, as a source of obligatons in the form of a unilateral act (arts. 884 to 886). At the same time, unjust enrichment existed before the publishing of this Code and remains in existance as a general principle of Civil Law. The present work has, as its objective, the analysis of historical aspects that resulted in the legal establishment of the term as a source of obligations, the main theories surrounding the theme, as well as the analysis of normative dispositions of the Brazilian Civil Code and its position in international judicial order, relating its fundamental principles to the manner in which it is applied. Therefore, the work intends to analyse the general characteristics of the term, its reach within Private Law, relating hypotheses of the configuration of the term expressed in the Brazilian Civil Code and examples of its application in Brazilian jurisprudence. The development of the project demonstrates that unjust enrichment has a large and growing importance in the Brazilian legal context, presenting itself as an important tool to render balance and justice to private dealings. The methodological direction used lies in judicial/dogmatic principles, since the intention is to analyse legal norms and their repercussion on the presented theme. In some aspects, it comes close to judicial/theoretical methodology, considering the social relevance that surrounds the term under scrutiny. As to the generic investigation types, the judicial/descriptive method predominates, since this work has, as its main objective, the interpretation of legal terms, not eliminating the possibility of judicial/progressive research, inasmuch as the study may lead to future tendencies concerning the application of the measure. The hypothetical/deductive method is applied, in which a theme is proposed and an analysis of the development of its characteristics is requested. The conclusions about the theme are relative and result from the argumentation structure presented in this dissertation, without disconsidering the fundaments of other studies, especially because it is a term whose comprehension is increasing with every new day
Trata-se de análise sobre o enriquecimento sem causa no Código Civil brasileiro, como fonte de obrigação e como princípio de Direito Civil. O Código Civil de 2002 disciplinou, de forma autônoma e inovadora, o instituto do enriquecimento sem causa como fonte de obrigação na espécie de ato unilateral (arts. 884 a 886). Paralelamente, o enriquecimento sem causa já existia antes do advento deste Código e continua a existir como princípio geral do Direito Civil. O presente trabalho tem por objetivo analisar os aspectos históricos que resultaram na previsão legal do instituto como fonte de obrigações, as principais teorias acerca do tema, bem como a previsão em ordenamentos jurídicos estrangeiros. Pretende-se também a análise das disposições normativas do Código Civil brasileiro e sua contextualização no ordenamento jurídico, relacionando seu fundamento principiológico e critérios para sua aplicação. Objetiva-se, assim, a análise das características gerais do instituto, seu alcance no Direito Privado, relacionando-se hipóteses de configuração do instituto expressamente previstas no Código Civil brasileiro e exemplos de sua aplicação pela jurisprudência brasileira. O desenvolvimento do trabalho demonstra que o enriquecimento sem causa tem grande e crescente importância no contexto jurídico brasileiro, apresentando-se como ferramenta importante para conferir equilíbrio e justiça às relações privadas. A vertente metodológica utilizada é a jurídico-dogmática, uma vez que se pretende analisar as normas legais e sua repercussão na análise do tema apresentado. Em alguns aspectos, aproxima-se da metodologia jurídico-teórica, tendo em vista a relevância social que circunda o tema em debate. Quanto aos tipos genéricos de investigação, tem-se a predominância jurídico-descritiva, pois o presente trabalho tem como principal objetivo a interpretação dos institutos legais, não se podendo descartar a possibilidade de pesquisa jurídico-projetiva, na medida em que o estudo poderá conduzir às futuras tendências quanto à aplicação do instituto. O método utilizado é o hipotético-dedutivo, em que, a partir do tema fornecido, propõe-se a análise e desenvolvimento de suas características. As conclusões a respeito do tema são relativas e decorrem da estrutura dos argumentos apresentados nessa dissertação, sem que se desconsidere a fundamentação de outros estudos, principalmente por tratar-se de um instituto cuja compreensão é construída a cada dia
Heine, Sonja. "Condictio sine datione : zur Haftung aus ungerechtfertigter Bereicherung im klassischen römischen Recht und zur Entstehung des Bereicherungsrechts im BGB /." Berlin : Duncker & Humblot, 2006. http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&doc_number=015028626&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA.
Full textAbd, El Hafiz Alaa. "De l'autonomie du quasi-contrat." Thesis, Aix-Marseille, 2017. http://www.theses.fr/2017AIXM0125.
Full textQuasi-contracts are set as an autonomous part of the civil code, yet the notion answers to no unity. Law defines the notion as a voluntary fact leading to bind its author but scholars are considering quasi-contracts to be halfway between contract law and tort law due to the lack of will leading nevertheless to binding obligations. Practice shows that, except for the business management based on a mandate without any express will, the other quasi-contracts, unjust enrichment and repetition of undue do not follow any contractual regime. Scholars have attempted to propose the transfer of value for explaining the unity of the notion but this criterion is no longer relevant since cases creating a new quasi-contracts: lotteries. This work aims to discover a new criterion to find back unity of quasi-contracts. Impossible task as each quasi-contract shares common aspects of contract law and of tort law
Sedláček, Václav. "Peňažité nároky z porušenia práv k duševnému vlastníctvu." Doctoral thesis, Vysoká škola ekonomická v Praze, 2009. http://www.nusl.cz/ntk/nusl-165934.
Full textDias, Ádamo Brasil. "Alimentos pagos pelo genitor aparente : soluções de reparação propostas ante a irrepetibilidade dos alimentos." reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFRGS, 2017. http://hdl.handle.net/10183/164116.
Full textThis is an academic master's thesis which research problem consists in the identification of solutions and respective legal grounds for the relief of the damage suffered by the apparent parent who is improperly required to pay for the child support, considering that it is an unrepeatable sum. It was used as method of approach the hypothetical-deductive one and as method of procedure the monographic and historical ones. The work was divided in three chapters. The first chapter aimed the deepening of the study of child support obligation, with an approach to historical evolution, characteristics, classifications, assumptions, presumption of paternity, child support during pregnancy, and, finally, the identification of the damage consubstantiated in the obligation of the imposition of paying the child support to an illegitimate child. The second chapter proposed a idealsolution, consisting of the obligation to repair the damage by the true parent, which initially examined the possibility of imputation of strict liability, but finally concluded that unjust enrichment was the appropriate basis. The third chapter presented subsidiary solutions, in the case of ignorance of the true parent, seeking to impute the duty of reparation to the mother who acts guilty by indicating the wrong parent in court. In order to do so, four possible reasons have been considered: unjust enrichment, abuse of rights and liability and strict liability, and it is concluded that in all cases there will be strict liability of the female custodian or pregnant mother, although still impositive the unrepeatable when present the good faith of the agent.
PORTONERA, GIUSEPPE. "FUNZIONE PUNITIVA E DIRITTO CIVILE. PROBLEMA E SISTEMA." Doctoral thesis, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 2022. http://hdl.handle.net/10280/120388.
Full textIn July 2017, the Civil Court of Cassation, Joint Sections issued a judgment opening to the exequatur of punitive damages award rendered by foreign courts. However, the Supreme Court did not limit its attention to the profile of private international law but went so far as to state that «in the current legal system, […] the functions of deterrence and punishment are inherent in the system». This dictum prompted the present research, which has been carried out with reference to the civil law system as a whole (tort law, so-called “relational” liability, and appropriative conflicts of resources in proprietary contexts). The problematic survey and the consequent systematic analysis carried out show that the role of the punitive function in the civil law system is very limited. The traditional civil law institutions appear capable of protecting private interests, thus the lack of compelling reasons to reconfigure them in a punitive sense. The main research results show that: de lege lata, punishment in private law does not rise to a general category; and de lege ferenda, there is no ground to promote a greater scope for it. Nevertheless, they have also outlined the possibility that punitive function plays a heuristic role – modest but not trivial – which may operate both in the negative (i.e., excluding eccentric interpretative outcomes), and in the positive (i.e., posing the question of a possible systematic innovation).
Sedláček, Václav. "Komparácia právnych úprav peňažitých nárokov z porušenia práv k duševnému vlastníctvu." Master's thesis, Vysoká škola ekonomická v Praze, 2008. http://www.nusl.cz/ntk/nusl-11959.
Full textBaca, del Pozo Siboney Yolanda. "Viabilidad del Enriquecimiento Injusto en materia Laboral. Ecuador-España." Doctoral thesis, Universitat de Barcelona, 2020. http://hdl.handle.net/10803/670844.
Full textLa Constitució de la República de l'Equador, promulgada l'octubre de 2008, va reconèixer l'enriquiment injust com a part de la naturalesa de les relacions laborals i, alhora, va establir que, en cas d'incórrer en ella, la persona responsable seria sancionada i penalitzada conforme a la llei. En fer una revisió general de l'enriquiment injust vam poder advertir que és present en la majoria dels ordenaments jurídics que provenen del dret romà i del Common Law. Quan vam pretendre estudiar-la a partir del dret laboral, ens vam trobar que, fins avui dia, no s'havia realitzat pràcticament cap aproximació que permetés determinar la seva viabilitat en aquesta branca, de naturalesa tuïtiva. De la mateixa manera, tampoc vam poder trobar els supòsits en els quals es pot configurar, sense perjudici que al Dret Civil Patrimonial vam poder apreciar que existeix un ampli desenvolupament d'aquesta, la qual cosa va ser un element determinant per a aquesta recerca. L'enriquiment injust és una figura que pot ser estudiada des de diverses branques del dret, ja que la seva finalitat consisteix en el fet que les relacions jurídiques siguin equitatives per a les parts, tant en la seva participació com en el resultat que obtinguin d'elles. Aquest treball pren com a punt de partida la disposició constitucional equatoriana i pretén establir si l'enriquiment injust, per la seva pròpia naturalesa jurídica, pot ser aplicable al dret laboral espanyol i a l'equatorià. El problema sorgeix a partir del moment en què el legislador equatorià, malgrat que la disposició constitucional forma part de l'ordenament jurídic des de fa més de deu anys, no ha dictat cap llei que reguli la seva aplicació a la seva interpretació, unit al fet que a Espanya no es localitza cap regulació legal respecte a aquesta figura en l'ordenament jurídic. Per això, el present treball inicia amb l'estudi doctrinari i jurisprudencial de l'enriquiment injust des del dret civil patrimonial per així estar en capacitat de traslladar-la al Dret Laboral i, d'aquesta manera, poder identificar el seu àmbit d'aplicació i els requisits necessaris per a la seva procedència. Per aquest motiu circumscrivim l'objecte d'estudi a les legislacions d'Espanya i l'Equador, sense perjudici que per a casos puntuals ens referim a alguna legislació comparada diferent. De la mateixa manera, pretenem trobar els fonaments que van portar al constituent equatorià a incorporar-lo en l'ordenament jurídic, i plantegem possibles solucions a les problemàtiques trobades.
The Constitution of the Republic of Ecuador promulgated on October 2008, acknowledged the legal figure of “unjust enrichment” as part of labor relations and sanctioned such conduct accordingly. As a result of an overall review of the unjust enrichment figure across civil law and common law legal systems, we noticed that such figure has been regulated or acknowledged in most of them. From a labor law perspective, we could not find comprehensive analyses or studies on the compatibility of this legal figure with the protective nature of this field of law. Furthermore, we did not find precedents and sufficient guidance to establish the legal scenarios under which this legal figure could be materialized (nonetheless, we note that the Civil Property Law has explored this concept extensively). This situation was a crucial and decisive factor to carry out this research. The unjust enrichment figure can be understood and studied by different fields of the law as it aims to achieve fair and equitable treatment and results for all parties involved. The starting point of this research is the Ecuadorian constitution and we will analyze whether the unjust enrichment figure can be applicable to the Spanish and Ecuadorian labor law. The main complication for such task is the lack of regulation on this concept. The Ecuadorian lawmakers have not issue any secondary laws to regulate the interpretation or enforcement of unjust enrichment even though such figure has been part of the Ecuadorian legal framework for more than 10 years. Likewise, there are no specific provisions on unjust enrichment in the Spanish legal framework. In light of the above, this research starts with an analysis of the doctrine and jurisprudence of the unjust enrichment figure from a Civil Property Law perspective and its compatibility or applicability to Labor Law. We also aim to identify the scope of application and the requirements or characteristics that conform this legal figure under Spanish and Ecuadorian Law; nevertheless, we may refer to different jurisdictions for specific cases. Likewise, we intend to (i) identify the grounds and reasons that led the Ecuadorian lawmakers to incorporate this figure into the Ecuadorian legal system, and (ii) propose possible solutions to any problems identified along this research.
Diango, Maïmouna. "La subrogation de l'assureur maritime." Thesis, Aix-Marseille, 2015. http://www.theses.fr/2015AIXM1011.
Full textSubrogation is a privileged mode of transmission of claims in marine insurance. It brings together key players in the maritime trade: the insured, the insurer and the third party responsible. Subrogation of the underwriter has always enjoyed a special favor resulting flexibility of legal texts both for subrogation exerted automatically by the fact of the law, for contractual subrogation which proceeds the will of the parties. However, faced with the procedural requirements of the courts, litigation of subrogation tends more toward a cure. Therefore, the question arises of whether if there are other alternatives to the underwriter? The arbitration is a good solution in terms of the flexibility of awards made in the matter. Also, judicial jurisprudence reported a great change that would insurers to ordinary means, among other things, the assignment, the repetition of the undue and action "de in rem verso" to overcome the uncertainty of litigation of subrogation. In terms of private international law, there is no specific rule of subrogation of the marine insurer. However, the Regulations Rome I and Rome II enact conflict mechanisms applicable to contractual and extra-contractual. They designate the law that governs subrogation
Pfeifer-Chomiczewska, Katarzyna. "Les rapports patrimoniaux entre concubins et leur liquidation. Etude comparative des droits français et polonais." Thesis, Tours, 2015. http://www.theses.fr/2015TOUR1003.
Full textAfter leaving the world of disapproval, concubinage has integrated the social order and consequently the legal order. In French law, cohabitation is legally defined. In Poland, a legal definition of cohabitation does not exist. Notwithstanding this difference, the elements of cohabitation in the two legal systems are similar. Cohabitation is characterized in France and in Poland by the absence of a legal relationship between partners, monogamy, stability and continuity, and community of life. In both countries, concubinage is not legally organized. Cohabitation does not create any rights or obligations between the cohabitants, whether in a personal, property or financial sphere. Property relationships of cohabitants and their liquidation pose many difficulties. In order to legally qualify the economic acts of the cohabitants, it is necessary to retrospectively analyse the facts
Karlsson, Andreas. "Ersättning vid upphovsrättsintrång enligt 54 § 1 st. URL : En momspliktig upplåtelse / överlåtelse eller ett skadestånd utan skada?" Thesis, Internationella Handelshögskolan, Högskolan i Jönköping, IHH, Rättsvetenskap, 2010. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:hj:diva-14256.
Full textVAT turnover of copyrights are subject to a reduced VAT-rate. In the Value added tax act (ML) the paragraph of 7 kap. 1 § 3 st. 8-9 p. ML refers directly to the Copyright act (URL) for the assessment of the existence of a copyright and, the sale or lease of such a right. If a taxable supply is at hand while, simultaneously, a legally valid lease or sale of a copyright can be established, the turnover is taxed at a reduced VAT-rate of six percent. The thesis investigates intrusion compensation under Article 54 § 1 st. URL relative to the value added tax turnover concept and the reduced rate in 7 kap 1 § 3 st. 8-9 p. ML. Compensation according to Article 54 § 1 st. URL must be paid when an infringement of copyright is at hand. Compensation should always be paid regardless of good faith and even in cases where the holder of the right has earned revenue by e.g. spin-offs. In the legal literature, it has therefore been expressed that Article 54 § 1 st. URL does not constitute damages, something that the legislature explicitly has classified it to be. When reviewing the character and purpose of the compensation in relation to URL, and its rules for the transition of the right, it is clear that a valid transition does not exist in a transaction that has prompted compensation under Article 54 § 1 st. URL. According to 7 kap. 1 § 3st. 8-9 p. ML, this is a prerequisite. For the transaction to be covered by the reduced VAT-rate, a valid transition, according to the general rules of the rights transition in URL, must be at hand. However, from a VAT-perspective, compensation under 54 § 1 st. URL is meant to reflect the conditions that would have been if the concerned parties had reached an agreement in advance. There is an undisputed link between the remuneration and the actual use of the right. Thus, the compensation could be deemed equal to a lawful lease of copyright. For the purposes of the reduced tax rate in 7 kap. 1 § 3st. 8-9 p. ML, an equation of the compensation to a lawful lease of copyright is not sufficient. The provision is directly connected to URL and any transition of copyright must therefore be examined under the URL's rules for the transition of rights. The overall conclusion of this thesis is therefore that compensation under 54 § 1 st. URL may be subject to VAT. However, due to the unconditional connection to URL, the turnover cannot qualify for the reduced tax rate of six percent stipulated in 7 kap. 1 § 3st. 8-9 p. ML. The compensation is paid as a result of an infringement of copyright and the absence of an explicit agreement prevents the application of the reduced tax rate in 7 kap. 1 § 3st. 8-9 p. ML.
Shi-Yan, Lu, and 盧錫烟. "Administrative contract and unjust enrichment." Thesis, 2009. http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/82392571560962638203.
Full textDietrich, Joachim. "The limitations of unjust enrichment : a new perspective on restitution." Phd thesis, 1994. http://hdl.handle.net/1885/132138.
Full textWu, Yuh Feng, and 吳玉豐. "A Study to principle of forbiddance of unjust enrichment on Insurance Law." Thesis, 1995. http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/43646308107146181308.
Full textKUANTING, LU, and 呂冠葶. "Research of Unjust Enrichment System-A Focus on Judical Practice in Taiwan." Thesis, 2015. http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/5hu3mk.
Full text開南大學
法律學系
103
According to the different validity of Juristic act, it can be divided into two parts — the act of real right and the act of personal right.Normally,the act of personal right is the cause of the act of real right. However, it must occur a kind of situation where the act of real right is invalid but the act of personal right is effective. During that time, the original owner cannot follow returning petition right to ask return the original. So it must have to create a new system for adjust the relationship between the parties. Even in taking the traditional view, the principle of “comparisons between benefits and damages” does fully comply with the legal context as well as the purpose of legal norm.Lawyers are familiar with unjust enrichment system, and which is widely used in judicial practice.Nevertheless, there only are five articles in unjust enrichment which mainly are abstractions and are many kinds of statement in how to make it concrete. In Chapter II, there will emphasis on discuss the important of unjust enrichment which would like to clear when the theory has various version does the practice processing in our country will have same opinion or do their own way. Also, in certain situation, the beneficiary needs to be responsible for return the interest to the injured. In Chapter III, through data analysis shows the importance of unjust enrichment in practice does increases year by year or not. In Chapter IV, focusing on discuss the research of unjust enrichment among three persons in depth and expect when the opinion of theory and practice are different there should study by case mainly and the theory to get much appreciated opinion. In Chapter V, there is a section of conclusion in this paper which point out the attitude in system of unjust enrichment and the difference in theory and practice.All in all, this paper looks forward to see a better cooperate with theory and the court of decisions in the future; meanwhile, there is properly done the spirit of unjust enrichment to make existing unjust enrichment law be more accord with people’s enforcement experience in Taiwan.
CHENG, HSIANG-CHIH, and 鄭翔之. "On Unjust Enrichment In Public Law-The Administrative Contract As The Center." Thesis, 2019. http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/j2f6y2.
Full text國立雲林科技大學
科技法律研究所
107
This thesis mainly discusses the relevant theory of "Unjust enrichment in public law". There are a lot of reasons for the unjust enrichment in public law, this thesis focuses on the scope of administrative contract, how to request in administrative or people. Combine searching for relevant interpretation with the resolutions, judgments and circulars, etc., to be collated and analyzed. The adjudication case No.8, 2017 by Improper Labor Behavior Adjudication Board, Ministry of Labor, which about TRA’s legal leave. Writing down with the Ministry of Labor as the defendant, filed a lawsuit to the Taipei High Administrative Court, acknowledging that the nature of the case was public law. However, the labor contract is a privately-owned labor contract, how could a civil servant apply for a labor ruling? It’s the case of this article. Outline of thesis: Chapter 1.Introduction Chapter 2.Basic theory of Unjust enrichment in public law Chapter 3.Basic theory of Administrative contract Chapter 4.Unjust enrichment in public law returning after invalidation of the administrative contract Chapter 5.Dispute over the exercise of the right with Unjust enrichment in public law Chapter 6.Case of Taiwan Railways Administration Chapter 7.Conclusion and Suggestion Through the collation, research and analysis of this thesis, could have a clearer understanding of the current situation and practical application with Unjust enrichment in public law of the administrative contract.
Chen, Cheng-Hsi, and 陳政熙. "No More “Unjust Enrichment”-The Reconstruction of the Liability for the Restitution of Benefits." Thesis, 2013. http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/00523833779842023221.
Full text國立臺北大學
法律學系一般生組
101
Lawyers are familiar with unjust enrichment system, and which is widely used in judicial practice. However, under the traditional view there are many of irregularity in the benefits’ concept and application. This paper not only point out the mistake of traditional view, but also try to put forward a new aspect-“Fluctuation of Benefits”. By the Fluctuation of Benefits, it could rearrange the appropriate content of benefits, avoid the foregoing disadvantages of the traditional view, simplify the identification of benefits, clear the effectiveness system of unjust enrichment claims, so that the existing unjust enrichment law may more in line with the law experience of the people of Taiwan. In the liability for the restitution of benefits, according to the Fluctuation of Benefits the controversy under the traditional view will cease to exist. Even in taking the traditional view, the principle of “comparisons between benefits and damages” does not fully comply with the legal context as well as the purpose of legal norm. Therefore, by this comparative analysis, the principle of “comparisons between benefits and damages” should really be considered the abolition of application. Look forward, this paper hope that in the future the court decisions will get rid of the traditional accustomed prejudice and truly implement the legal spirit of unjust enrichment-"removing improper benefits ", so that benefit recipients are no longer "unjust enrichment".
Lo, Yu-Ting, and 羅郁婷. "The alteration of gains and losses in unjust enrichment for the infringement upon proprietary interests." Thesis, 2019. http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/ec7c43.
Full text國立臺灣大學
法律學研究所
107
The thesis “The alteration of gains and losses in unjust enrichment for the infringement upon proprietary interests” mainly on how to definite and explain the requirements of unjust enrichment for the infringement upon proprietary interests. About the alteration of gains and losses, the thesis has two parts with that. The aim of the second chapter is to confirm the content of the property rights which is altered in case, in virtue of organizing and analyzing judicial judgements and scholars’ theories; in addition, introducing two causes of action of the law of restitution for defendant’s wrongs and claimant’s proprietary property right interfered by defendant in United Kingdom. Secondly, in the third chapter is about “The determination of the connection between gains and losses” , and with regard to the requirement of Civil Code Article 179 “A person who acquires interests without any legal ground and prejudice to the other”. The thesis points out the direct causation theory shall be replaced with direct connection. The reasons are not only distinguishing the purpose of unjust enrichment from the purpose of torts, but also the infringement upon other’s proprietary interests and receiving gain, equal to make the right holder suffer loss. Therefore, in the thesis, the process of identifying the alteration between gains and losses is: first, confirm what kind of interest or property right being altered in the case is; secondly, confirm the origin of the alteration of proprietary interests; third, determine the alteration of the attribution of proprietary interests, and establish the track of the alteration of interests; fourth, confirm the relative relationship between the gains and losses; fifth, determine whether the beneficiary has the legitimacy of the retained interest; and finally, determine whether there is a direct connection between the gains and losses
Sonnekus, J. C. "Die grondslag van die eis Quantum Meruit in die Suid-Afrikaanse reg." Thesis, 2015. http://hdl.handle.net/10210/14193.
Full textZatorski, Daniel. "Gain-based remedies for breach of contract : a comparative analysis of Polish law." Praca doktorska, 2020. https://ruj.uj.edu.pl/xmlui/handle/item/279639.
Full textPalička, Jan. "Kolektivní správa autorských práv se zaměřením na problematiku bezdůvodného obohacení z pohledu kolektivního správce." Master's thesis, 2016. http://www.nusl.cz/ntk/nusl-347009.
Full textLai, Hsueh-Chin, and 賴雪琴. "A Study on Unjust Enrichment in Public Law-The Right of Tax Refund on Article 28 of the Tax Collection Act." Thesis, 2018. http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/ybatd4.
Full text中原大學
財經法律研究所
106
ABSTRACT On July 12, 2016, the first Division Chief Judge Joint Meeting of July resolved to adopt the theory of summation for the subject matter of litigation regarding “inapplicable choice of law” in Article 28 of the Tax Collection Act - including error of fact in tax injunctions by revenue services - based on the principle of equity and the Taxpayer Rights Protection Act, which comes into effect on December 28, 2017. It is expected that this resolution will produce great impact on the implementation of Article 28 of the Tax Collection Act. Therefore, the present study explains the connection between unjust enrichment through public law and unjust enrichment through the Civil Code, fundamental theories of unjust enrichment in tax law, and the types of legal remedies available to taxpayers, leading into an investigation of the specificity of Article 28 of the Tax Collection Act in terms of administrative law and its practical issues. This study further discusses relevant theoretical bases, judicial practice, and opinions from academia. Based on the key points above, this study is structured as follows: Chapter 1, Introduction, explains the background, purposes, and methodology of this study and the definitions of the issues of interest herein to highlight the importance and of the legal bases of causes of action for tax refund in tax collection practice and issues that have arisen from such practice. Chapter 2, Legal Bases for Causes of Action for Tax Refund in Tax Law, explains the connection between the unjust enrichment system in public law and unjust enrichment in the Civil Code, the legal nature of causes of action for restitution of unjust enrichment in tax, and methods available to the public to request remedies from revenue services, so as to provide clear context to the issues raised thus far in this study. Chapter 3, On Article 28 of the Tax Collection Act, further discusses the reasons, nature, and elements of the amendment to Article 28 of the Tax Collection Act on January 21, 2009. Chapter 4, On Practical Issues of Article 28 of the Tax Collection Act, discusses common issues in tax collection practice. Chapter 5, Conclusions, summarizes arguments in previous chapters, submits the stance of this study, serve as the basis for future research, and offer reference for practical operations. Keywords:Unjust Enrichment in Public Law、Unjust Enrichment in Tax Law、Article 28 of the Tax Collection Act、The Right of Tax Refund、On Practical Issues of Article 28 of the Tax Collection Act、Elimination Time ABSTRACT On July 12, 2016, the first Division Chief Judge Joint Meeting of July resolved to adopt the theory of summation for the subject matter of litigation regarding “inapplicable choice of law” in Article 28 of the Tax Collection Act - including error of fact in tax injunctions by revenue services - based on the principle of equity and the Taxpayer Rights Protection Act, which comes into effect on December 28, 2017. It is expected that this resolution will produce great impact on the implementation of Article 28 of the Tax Collection Act. Therefore, the present study explains the connection between unjust enrichment through public law and unjust enrichment through the Civil Code, fundamental theories of unjust enrichment in tax law, and the types of legal remedies available to taxpayers, leading into an investigation of the specificity of Article 28 of the Tax Collection Act in terms of administrative law and its practical issues. This study further discusses relevant theoretical bases, judicial practice, and opinions from academia. Based on the key points above, this study is structured as follows: Chapter 1, Introduction, explains the background, purposes, and methodology of this study and the definitions of the issues of interest herein to highlight the importance and of the legal bases of causes of action for tax refund in tax collection practice and issues that have arisen from such practice. Chapter 2, Legal Bases for Causes of Action for Tax Refund in Tax Law, explains the connection between the unjust enrichment system in public law and unjust enrichment in the Civil Code, the legal nature of causes of action for restitution of unjust enrichment in tax, and methods available to the public to request remedies from revenue services, so as to provide clear context to the issues raised thus far in this study. Chapter 3, On Article 28 of the Tax Collection Act, further discusses the reasons, nature, and elements of the amendment to Article 28 of the Tax Collection Act on January 21, 2009. Chapter 4, On Practical Issues of Article 28 of the Tax Collection Act, discusses common issues in tax collection practice. Chapter 5, Conclusions, summarizes arguments in previous chapters, submits the stance of this study, serve as the basis for future research, and offer reference for practical operations. Keywords:Unjust Enrichment in Public Law、Unjust Enrichment in Tax Law、Article 28 of the Tax Collection Act、The Right of Tax Refund、On Practical Issues of Article 28 of the Tax Collection Act、Elimination Time
Pereira, Ivone Ôlo. "A RELEVÂNCIA JURÍDICA DA PRESTAÇÃO DO TRABALHO DOMÉSTICO NO CONTEXTO DA RUTURA DA UNIÃO DE FACTO E O ACOLHIMENTO DA FIGURA DO ENRIQUECIMENTO SEM CAUSA." Master's thesis, 2022. http://hdl.handle.net/10316/99787.
Full textO instituto da União de Facto tem vindo, progressivamente, a assumir uma grande importância no nosso ordenamento-jurídico. No entanto, ainda nos dias de hoje, se verifica uma grande discrepância na divisão de tarefas domésticas e nos encargos com a vida familiar. O desempenho das tarefas domésticas, bem como a ajuda na atividade comercial do outro companheiro e cuidado dos filhos, quando prestados de forma excessivamente onerosa e desproporcional, expõe a necessidade sentida no âmbito do Direito da Família, nomeadamente em caso de rutura União de facto, de uma regulação legal que vise nortear os efeitos patrimoniais que daí resultam. Isto assim, dada a discrepância verificada na situação patrimonial de cada unido de facto – o unido de facto de facto que, de forma exclusiva, se ocupa das tarefas do lar e do cuidado dos filhos vê-se numa situação desfavorável face àquele que não ajuda em casa pois este, trabalhando ou dedicando-se mais afincadamente ao trabalho, pode adquirir bens e aumentar o seu património. Esta desigualdade deve ser tutelada pelo Direito mas, como o legislador se remete ao silêncio, importa saber qual a via pela qual se deve optar para resolver estas questões. No casamento a questão é muito clara, a regulação destas situações é feita em artigo próprio para o efeito, mas, para a União de Facto, a solução não é unânime na doutrina e na jurisprudência. O casamento e a União de Facto, embora apresentem muitos pontos em comum, nomeadamente a afetividade e os laços que ligam o casal, apresentam igualmente muitas diferenças. Assim, não sendo assente na nossa jurisprudência e na nossa doutrina que é possível proceder à aplicação analógica das normas do casamento à União de Facto e, na ausência de qualquer regulamentação legal, as soluções dadas ao problema exposto encontram-se nos mais variados institutos de Direito Comum entre os quais, o instituto do enriquecimento sem causa.
The institute of cohabitation has progressively come to assume great importance in our legal system. However, even today, there is a large discrepancy in the division of domestic tasks and the burden of family life.The performance of domestic tasks, as well as helping the other partner in the commercial activity and taking care of children, when provided in an excessively onerous and disproportionate way, exposes the need felt within the scope of Family Law, namely in the event of a cohabitation rupture, of a legal regulation that aims to guide the patrimonial effects that result therefrom. In this sense, given the discrepancy verified in the patrimonial situation of each cohabitation partner - the partner who, exclusively, deals with the tasks of the home and the taking care of children is in an unfavorable situation compared to those who do not help at home, as they, working or dedicating themselves more diligently to work, can acquire goods and increase their assets. This inequality must be protected by law, but, as the legislator is silent, it is important to know which path should be chosen to resolve these issues.In marriage, the issue is very clear, the regulation of these situations is made in a specific article for the purpose, but, for the Cohabitation, the solution is not unanimous in doctrine and jurisprudence. Marriage and cohabitation, although they have many points in common, namely affection and the bonds that bind the couple, also present many differences. Thus, it is not based on our jurisprudence and on our doctrine that it is possible to proceed with the analogical application of the rules of marriage to the cohabitation and, in the absence of any legal regulation, the solutions given to the above problem are found in the most varied institutes of Common Law, including the institute of unjust enrichment.
Keltner, Miloslav. "Bezdůvodné obohacení v obchodním právu." Master's thesis, 2012. http://www.nusl.cz/ntk/nusl-304047.
Full text