Academic literature on the topic 'Treaty Establishing a Constitution for Europe (2004)'
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Treaty Establishing a Constitution for Europe (2004).'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Journal articles on the topic "Treaty Establishing a Constitution for Europe (2004)"
Kwiecień, Roman. "The Primacy of European Union Law over National Law Under the Constitutional Treaty." German Law Journal 6, no. 11 (November 1, 2005): 1479–95. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s2071832200014450.
Full textVogel, Joachim. "The European Integrated Criminal Justice System and its Constitutional Framework." Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law 12, no. 2 (June 2005): 125–47. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1023263x0501200202.
Full textDashwood, Alan. "The Draft EU Constitution—First Impressions." Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies 5 (2003): 395–417. http://dx.doi.org/10.5235/152888712802784270.
Full textDashwood, Alan. "The Draft EU Constitution—First Impressions." Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies 5 (2003): 395–417. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s1528887000004407.
Full textYataganas, Xenophon, and George Tsebelis. "The Treaty of Nice, the Convention Draft and the Constitution for Europe Under a Veto Players Analysis." European Constitutional Law Review 1, no. 3 (October 2005): 429–51. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s1574019605004293.
Full textVAN GERVEN, WALTER. "The European Union institutions in the draft Constitution for Europe." European Review 12, no. 4 (October 2004): 465–79. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s1062798704000419.
Full textArnull, Anthony. "A Constitutional Court for Europe?" Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies 6 (2004): 1–34. http://dx.doi.org/10.5235/152888712802759502.
Full textArnull, Anthony. "A Constitutional Court for Europe?" Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies 6 (2004): 1–34. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s1528887000003554.
Full textBenz, Arthur. "The European Union’s Trap of Constitutional Politics: From the Convention Towards the Failure of the Treaty of Lisbon." Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel 17, no. 1, 2 & 3 (July 11, 2011): 2008. http://dx.doi.org/10.21991/c92h3w.
Full textJÁUREGUI BERECIARTU, GURUTZ, and JUAN IGNACIO UGARTEMENDIA ECEIZABARRENA. "EUROPA EN EL LECHO DE PROCUSTO: DE LA CONSTITUCIÓN EUROPEA AL TRATADO DE LISBOA." Revista Vasca de Administración Pública / Herri-Arduralaritzarako Euskal Aldizkaria, no. 79 (December 1, 2007): 105–24. http://dx.doi.org/10.47623/ivap-rvap.79.2007.1.04.
Full textDissertations / Theses on the topic "Treaty Establishing a Constitution for Europe (2004)"
LEHTONEN, Tiia. "Small States – Big Negotiations Decision-Making Rules and Small State Influence in EU Treaty Negotiations." Doctoral thesis, 2009. http://hdl.handle.net/1814/11148.
Full textExamining Board: Derek Beach (University of Aarhus), Adrienne Héritier (EUI/RSCAS) (Supervisor), Jonas Tallberg (University of Stockholm), Jacques Ziller (University of Pavia, formerly EUI, Law Department)
This study examines the impact of the decision-making rules, procedures and practices of the European Union on the ability of small Member States to influence Treaty negotiation outcomes, and assesses the causality of this influence in Treaty-revision. Within Treatymaking processes, actor influence is here expected to vary according to the institutional preconditions, and small states are presumed to benefit from particular type of decisionmaking rules to the disadvantage of others. The fundamental aim of the study is therefore to investigate the conditions under which small state influence increases in European Union Treaty-negotiations. To explain this puzzle, a distinction is made between two types of Treaty-making processes, those of the Intergovernmental Conferences and the Convention, which allows for subsequent comparisons between the decision-making rules of unanimity and restricted consensus. In order to empirically test the underlying hypotheses, explicit units of observation are chosen from the IGCs of Amsterdam, Nice and 2003-04, and the Convention on the Future of the EU. In-depth comparisons are made between four small Member States – Belgium, Denmark, Finland and Ireland – and their de facto influence is process-traced through three substantial issues of the institutional reform: the composition of the Commission, the extension of qualified majority voting and the reform of Council Presidency. The empirical analysis focuses on both informal and formal levels of decisionmaking dynamics, and a further analytical distinction is made between bargaining and deliberation modes of conflict-resolution. Drawing initially on theories of rational choice institutionalism (RCI) and liberal intergovernmentalism (LI), the unanimity rule as applied in the IGCs is expected to strengthen the formal position of an individual small state by providing, respectively, a veto-right for each negotiator and promoting asymmetric interdependency. The empirical findings confirm the major underlying hypothesis concerning the correlation between the adopted decision-making rules and the small states’ impact on distributional outcomes in the EU Treaty-amending negotiations on the one hand, and the superiority of the unanimity rule for small states on the other. Yet, a couple of additional key success factors – other than can be explained exclusively along the conjectures of RCI or LI schools – are also identified in the study.
Chi, Pei-Fen, and 紀佩汾. "The forming process of the “Treaty Establishing a Constitution for Europe” and its evaluation." Thesis, 2006. http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/24036852553501855759.
Full text國立臺灣大學
政治學研究所
95
After 50 years of integration experience, the European Union member states, in 2004, have developed the “Treaty Establishing a Constitution for Europe,” from which the past treaties are compiled together and EU institutions and national roles are enumerated. Samuel Huntington used to emphasize that, if EU could integrate successfully in political sphere, the world would be led by EU in the 21st century. However, the denial of the initial text of “the Constitution” in France and Netherlands in 2005 makes the development of the EU constitution all the more uncertain. So, the thesis is intended to explore and evaluate the forming process of the European milestone in the early 21st century, “Treaty Establishing a Constitution for Europe.” In the first chapter, the preface would illustrate the main idea of this thesis and the neo-institutionalism approach. In the second chapter, we will provide an overview of the EU constitution, including its history and institution designation. In the third chapter, the internal and external factors for developing the EU constitution will be explained. Then in the forth chapter, we will discuss how each individual state proposed their opinions, debated, and finally compromised in the “inter-governmental conventions.” In the following fifth chapter, the domestic ratification status quo in each country and the reason why they pass or do not pass it will be demonstrated. In the sixth chapter, we will review the development of the EU constitution, its dilemma and possible influences included. Lastly, we come to our conclusion on the EU constitution: EU, with its past experience of supra-nationalism and inter-governmentalism, will inevitably face many difficulties in its integration process, yet we believe it still is the right direction most European countries are heading for.
Chen, Chiu-Tung, and 陳秋同. "A Study of Multilevel Constitutionalism in the "Treaty in Establishing a Constitution for Europe"." Thesis, 2009. http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/12052573892494755348.
Full text國立臺灣師範大學
政治學研究所
97
This study aims to focus on “Multilevel Constitutionalism,” which derived from the special model of governance in a process of dynamic development of European integration. In the basis of defining the European Union and European community are constitutional sovereignties. This thesis tries to explain Multilevel Constitutionalism’s development and application with the “Treaty in Establishing a Constitution for Europe” and changes in several integration treaties, and explain political constitutionalism developments across two, or more than two levels. Furthermore, this thesis tries to collect the possible influences of Multilevel Constitutionalism in the area of international relation and international law.
Cheng, Chun-Yuan, and 鄭鈞元. "The Evolution of the Common Foreign and Security Policy in the Treaty Establishing a Constitution for Europe." Thesis, 2006. http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/71007477641639698096.
Full text淡江大學
歐洲研究所碩士班
94
This thesis examines the influence of the Constitutional Treaty on the evolution of the Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP). The analysis here starts from the process establishing the constitutional Treaty. From the institutional aspect, this paper then analyzes the evolution of the institutional architecture under the newly reformed structure, especially in the sphere of CFSP. The third part of this paper concerns the flexibility of political instruments in the CFSP. The fourth part follows with the analysis of executive capacity and failures and successes of CFSP in the past decades. Finally, this thesis puts focus on the process of ratification of Constitutional Treaty and the future of the Constitutional Treaty after the “NO” vote in France and Netherlands. The development of the Common Foreign and Security Policy and its forerunner European Political Cooperation (EPC) over the last four decades is of high political and academic relevance. The European Union (EU) is increasingly perceived by third states and international organizations as an important actor in the international system. The policy of enlargement has made the need for institutional reform inescapable where was previously simply pressing. Over the past 20 years the founding treaty of Rome has been revised four times, yet each time the institutional set-up became more, not less complex. Decision-making procedures are too complicated. Policies are often ineffective. This treaty revision can be regarded as an historic milestone, a history making decision at a critical juncture, or as a choice for Europe. Even if the Constitutional Treaty does not enter into force, it will continue to serve to describe a certain state in the evolution of the EU system, as well as to identify options for shaping the constitutional architecture. As regards to the CFSP, it does, however, make certain that the Union may in the foreseeable future remain a participant in the international scene with a noticeably fragmented profile or – put more positively – with a multifaceted profile.
Feichtinger, Jiří. "Ústava pro Evropu." Doctoral thesis, 2011. http://www.nusl.cz/ntk/nusl-311385.
Full textKubiš, Vojtěch. "Osobitý přínos Římsko-katolické církve k evropské integrace podle článku 17(3) SFEU: vnímání dialogu s COMECE Evropskou unií." Master's thesis, 2020. http://www.nusl.cz/ntk/nusl-434759.
Full textBooks on the topic "Treaty Establishing a Constitution for Europe (2004)"
Triantafyllou, Dimitris. La constitution de l'Union européenne: Selon le Traité de Rome de 2004 : les choix clés de la Convention et de la Conférence intergouvernementale. 2nd ed. Bruxelles: Bruylant, 2005.
Find full textSens et conséquences du "non" français: Manuel critique du parfait Européen, la suite! Paris: Éditions du Seuil, 2005.
Find full textG, Xuereb Peter, ed. The constitution for Europe: An evaluation : EDRC conference 2005. [Malta]: European Documentation and Research Centre, University of Malta, 2005.
Find full textWalker, Neil. Europa: Il momento costituzionale. Padova: CEDAM, 2005.
Find full textAndrew, Cowgill, and British Management Data Foundation, eds. The European Constitution in perspective: Analysis and review of 'The Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe' including the complete text of the Treaty with all Protocols and Declarations as signed in Rome on 29 October 2004. Stroud, Gloucestershire: British Management Data Foundation, 2004.
Find full textLe vertige social-nationaliste: La gauche du non et le referendum de 2005. Paris: Table ronde, 2005.
Find full textReynié, Dominique. Le vertige social-nationaliste: La gauche du Non et le référendum de 2005. Paris: Table ronde, 2005.
Find full text20 anos de integração europeia (1986-2006): O testemunho português. Chamusca: Edições Cosmos, 2007.
Find full text1939-, Mantl Wolfgang, Puntscher Riekmann Sonja, and Schweitzer Michael, eds. Der Konvent zur Zukunft der Europäischen Union. Wien: Böhlau, 2005.
Find full textTreaty establishing a constitution for Europe: Including the protocols and annexes, and final act with declarations, Rome, 29 October 2004 : Presented to Parliament by the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs by Command of Her Majesty, December 2004. London: Stationery Office, 2004.
Find full textBook chapters on the topic "Treaty Establishing a Constitution for Europe (2004)"
Shaw, Jo. "Flexibility and the Treaty Establishing a Constitution for Europe." In The EU Constitution: The Best Way Forward?, 59–70. The Hague: T.M.C. Asser Press, 2005. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-90-6704-543-8_4.
Full textDi Salvatore, Enzo. "The Supremacy of European law in the Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe in the light of Community experience." In Governing Europe under a Constitution, 375–99. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2006. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/3-540-31291-9_23.
Full textÁlvarez, Milagros. "Common Security and Defence Policy in the Treaty Establishing a Constitution for Europe." In The Changing Politics of European Security, 87–109. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2007. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9780230801349_5.
Full textKönig, Thomas, and Daniel Finke. "In the Aftermath of the Negative Referendums: The Irish Resistance." In Reforming the European Union. Princeton University Press, 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.23943/princeton/9780691153926.003.0008.
Full textKönig, Thomas, and Daniel Finke. "Why (Unpopular) Leaders Announce Popular Votes." In Reforming the European Union. Princeton University Press, 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.23943/princeton/9780691153926.003.0006.
Full textLenaerts, Koen, Piet Van Nuffel, and Tim Corthaut. "The Treaty of Lisbon and the Current Treaties." In EU Constitutional Law, 40–49. Oxford University Press, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198851592.003.0002.
Full textLoveland, Ian. "24. Conclusion." In Constitutional Law, Administrative Law, and Human Rights. Oxford University Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198804680.003.0024.
Full textLoveland, Ian. "23. Conclusion." In Constitutional Law, Administrative Law, and Human Rights, 649–60. Oxford University Press, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198860129.003.0023.
Full text"The Treaty Establishing a Constitution for Europe and Challenges for Criminal Law at the Commencement of 21st Century." In Crime, Criminal Law and Criminal Justice in Europe, 181–210. Brill | Nijhoff, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/9789004250789_009.
Full textKönig, Thomas, and Daniel Finke. "Principals and Agents: From the Convention’s Proposal to the Constitutional Treaty." In Reforming the European Union. Princeton University Press, 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.23943/princeton/9780691153926.003.0007.
Full text