Academic literature on the topic 'Transitional justice Timor-Leste'

Many transitional countries face the problem of establishing the rule of law in a weak justice sector where a gulf separates local legal norms from national, constitutional norms that are drawn largely from the international sphere. As a case study of East Timor this article challenges simplistic positivist notions about the normative hierarchy of laws within a constitutionally bounded polity. It argues that in transitional countries such as East Timor legal pluralism is important but must be properly tuned to serve the rule of law. Legal pluralism poses certain dangers when it operates without any of the checks or balances that ensure accountability and the promotion of constitutional values such as equality. The rule of law is not served by an informal system where there are no formal avenues of appeal and thus minimal accountability and transparency. A more promising version of legal pluralism that comports with the rule of law is one that empowers the state to monitor local decisions to ensure that they observe the norms set out in East Timor's Constitution.

O trabalho a seguir se propõe a analisar o fundamento teórico do direito à verdade, sua origem histórica e implicações. Para tanto parte da ideia arendtiana de que a verdade factual muitas vezes está em oposição à política. Assim, a mentira e o segredo são instrumentos eficazes para manutenção e sobrevivência do autoritarismo estatal. Portanto, estabelecer a verdade se torna elemento essencial de um estado democrático de direito. O direito à verdade, nesse sentido é reconhecido como um direito de toda a coletividade e se relaciona à discussão sobre o acesso à informação e a responsabilização de agentes do estado. Existe ainda uma segunda faceta do direito à verdade, que se encontra na origem da construção do conceito e consiste no direito individual em saber sobre as circunstâncias do desaparecimento de pessoas. Além do reconhecimento do direito à verdade, outro problema central dos direitos humanos e que não pode ser preterido é a sua efetivação. Com efeito, a enunciação de direitos, por si só, não basta. A partir dessa perspectiva, cumpre observar como o direito à verdade pode ser implementado. Dentre os diversos mecanismos disponíveis, as comissões da verdade chamam especial atenção. Nesse sentido, a Comissão de Acolhimento Verdade e Reconciliação (CAVR) de Timor-Leste representa um marco paradigmático para o direito à verdade. Para compreender o funcionamento e os resultados da comissão é necessário considerar as características gerais de uma comissão da verdade, bem como o contexto social e cultural de Timor-Leste. As comissões da verdade, como meios alternativos de solução de conflitos inserem-se em um contexto de justiça restaurativa, cujo objetivo primordial é o encerramento do ciclo de violência. Em razão do poder reconciliador que possuem, inúmeras comissões instalaram-se ao redor do globo, com a onda de democratizações, sobretudo a partir dos anos 90. Embora seja possível identificar alguns elementos comuns às comissões da verdade, cada um delas conta com peculiaridades próprias. Com efeito, a diversidade de contextos nos quais se desenvolvem os mecanismos de justiça de transição, se traduzem também na diversidade do trabalho de tais instituições. Portanto, para que se compreendam os trabalhos e desafios enfrentados pela CAVR, é preciso apreender o contexto da sociedade timorense. Timor-Leste caracteriza-se por ser uma sociedade segmentada, em que a justiça comunitária ainda é o principal meio de solução de conflitos. Outro importante fator é a tradição da linguagem oral, que valoriza a memória para o estabelecimento de regras sociais e de justiça. A CAVR, ao incorporar esses elementos, logrou êxito na condução da reconciliação no nível das comunidades e contribuiu igualmente para a construção da identidade nacional. A documentação produzida serviu ainda como importante referência para que se trouxessem à luz os abusos cometidos. Nesse sentido, teve uma importante função educativa ao esclarecer as relações estabelecidas entre os indivíduos e o estado durante o regime autoritário. Além disso, as recomendações produzidas pela CAVR revelam-se ainda atuais, servindo como referência para o desenvolvimento de instituições e políticas nacionais em Timor-Leste.
The following study analyzes the theoretical basis of the right to truth, its historical origin and implications. It´s starting point is Hannah Arendt´s idea that factual truth is often in opposition to politics. Thus, the recourse to lies and the secrecy are effective tools for the maintenance and survival of state authoritarianism. Therefore, establishing the truth becomes a crucial element of democratic states based on the rule of law. The right to the truth in this regard is recognized as a right of the whole community and relates to the discussion on access to information and accountability of state agents. There is a second dimension of the right to truth, which lies within the original construction of the concept and translates into the individual right to know about the circumstances of the disappearance of persons. In addition to the recognition of the right to truth, another central issue of human rights - and that can not disregarded is its effectiveness. The sole announcement of the recognition of rights is not enough. From this perspective, the way in which the right to truth can be implemented should be noted. Among the various available mechanisms, truth commissions draw special attention. Accordingly, the Commission for Reception Truth and Reconciliation (CAVR) in Timor-Leste offers a paradigmatic framework for the right to truth. In order to understand how it operated and the outputs of the commission, it is necessary to consider the general characteristics of a truth commissions, as well as the social and cultural context of Timor-Leste. As alternative means of dispute resolution, truth commissions fall into the broader context of restorative justice, for which the primary goal is the end of the cycle of violence . Because of the reconciling power they have, many commissions have been set up around the globe, especially after the wave of democratizations in the 90s. Although it is possible to identify some common elements, each truth commission has its own peculiarities. The diversity of contexts in which transitional justice mechanisms develop, implicate on the diversity of the work of such institutions. Therefore, in order to understand the work and challenges faced by the CAVR, it is necessary to understand the context of East Timorese society. Timor-Leste is a segmented society, where community justice is still the primary means of conflict resolution. Another important factor is the tradition of oral language, which values the memory in order to establish of social rules and justice. By incorporating such elements, the CAVR was successful in driving the reconciliation process at the community level and at the same time contributed to the construction of national identity. The documents the CAVR produced also served as an important reference in order to shred light into the human rights violations. In this sense, it had an important educational role by clarifying the relations between individuals and the state during the authoritarian regime. In addition, the recommendations produced by the CAVR turn out to be still accurate, acting as a reference for the development of national institutions and policies in Timor-Leste.

Scholars continue to debate how to best rebuild post-conflict societies. Some argue that the liberal peacebuilding framework is incompatible with local contexts and therefore recommend more substantial involvement of local actors. Others suggest that the problem is not the liberal peacebuilding framework itself, but its poor implementation and therefore recommend increased emphasis on strong institutions and capacity-building. Given the ongoing liberal rhetoric of the United Nations (UN) in rebuilding post-conflict societies, this thesis contributes to this debate by asking the question, does liberal peacebuilding really work? To find out the answer, the thesis assesses the UN transitional administrations in Cambodia, Kosovo, and Timor-Leste using a comparative case-study approach. This assessment includes an evaluation of how these transitional administrations implemented their mandates and how local involvement factored into the conduct of their peacebuilding activities. It also includes an examination of the outcomes of international and local encounters and top-down and bottom-up approaches in rebuilding security, pursuing justice and reconciliation, and promoting development by obtaining personal insights from the international and local actors who were involved during the transition. This thesis thus interrogates both the liberal assumption that the liberal peacebuilding framework can promote and sustain peace and the recommendation of liberal peacebuilding critics that local actors and agencies should be better incorporated into the peacebuilding process. This thesis finds that shallow liberal peacebuilding with fragile institutions and co-opted local involvement failed to build long-lasting peace. It reveals instances when the UN transitional administrations in Cambodia, Kosovo, and Timor-Leste departed from their liberal peacebuilding objectives. They were not consistently liberal because they failed to live up to their liberal mandates and they were also not entirely peace-building because they failed to espouse the original and holistic conceptualization of peacebuilding, which includes both negative and positive peace. When confronted with threats of instability, the UN transitional administrations analysed in this thesis leant too far towards the local even at the cost of liberal values. They also demonstrated a tendency to limit local involvement to actors who they feared might incite instability. The case studies show that local involvement that is exclusive, superficial, non-representative, and politicized does not contribute to a long-lasting peace. Considering the strengths and weaknesses of both liberal peacebuilding and local involvement, this thesis proposes a middle-ground alternative or a locally-moderated liberal peacebuilding approach that integrates the local in liberal peacebuilding while consistently anchoring local involvement in liberal values. The analyses of the case studies and the recommendations drawn from them aim to contribute to informing the debates about liberal peacebuilding and to advising future international post-conflict peacebuilding missions.