Academic literature on the topic 'Transferability of legitimate interest'
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Transferability of legitimate interest.'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Journal articles on the topic "Transferability of legitimate interest"
Rautenbach, Christa. "Editorial." Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal/Potchefstroomse Elektroniese Regsblad 17, no. 1 (April 24, 2017): 1. http://dx.doi.org/10.17159/1727-3781/2014/v17i1a2295.
Full textBurmistrova, Svetlana A. "Legitimate Interest as Legal Opportunity." JURIST 22 (November 30, 2017): 42–46. http://dx.doi.org/10.18572/1812-3929-2017-22-42-46.
Full textKlein, Renate C. A., and Helmut Lamm. "Legitimate Interest in Couple Conflict." Journal of Social and Personal Relationships 13, no. 4 (November 1996): 619–26. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0265407596134008.
Full textLoskutov, Tymur, Sergey Miroshnychenko, and Rostyslav Lemekha. "THE CONCEPT OF LEGITIMATE ECONOMIC INTEREST." Baltic Journal of Economic Studies 4, no. 5 (February 11, 2019): 175. http://dx.doi.org/10.30525/2256-0742/2018-4-5-175-178.
Full textRowan, Solène. "THE “LEGITIMATE INTEREST IN PERFORMANCE” IN THE LAW ON PENALTIES." Cambridge Law Journal 78, no. 1 (February 8, 2019): 148–74. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0008197318000958.
Full textRainsberger, Richard. "Understand ‘legitimate educational interest’ under FERPA." Campus Legal Advisor 19, no. 6 (January 25, 2019): 4. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cala.30956.
Full textRainsberger, Richard. "Understand ‘legitimate educational interest’ under FERPA." Campus Legal Advisor 19, no. 7 (February 15, 2019): 6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cala.30974.
Full textRainsberger, Richard. "FERPA's legitimate educational interest: Some examples." Successful Registrar 18, no. 7 (August 17, 2018): 3. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/tsr.30507.
Full textRainsberger, Richard. "Understand ‘legitimate educational interest’ under FERPA." Disability Compliance for Higher Education 24, no. 9 (March 20, 2019): 7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/dhe.30618.
Full textMALINOVA, A. G. "Are legal definitions of “interest” and “legitimate interest” possible?" Eurasian Law Journal 8, no. 147 (2020): 64–65. http://dx.doi.org/10.46320/2073-4506-2020-8-147-64-65.
Full textDissertations / Theses on the topic "Transferability of legitimate interest"
Carlucci, Sarah. "La trasferibilità delle autorizzazioni e concessioni amministrative." Electronic Thesis or Diss., Toulon, 2021. http://www.theses.fr/2021TOUL0140.
Full textThe research aims to investigate the problems relating to the transfer of administrative acts between private subjects, especially with attention to activities related to health services, where it is difficult to find a balance between conflicting interests,The subjective change in the legal relationship between the Public Administration and the holder of the administrative act, which is replaced by a new beneficiary, must be read as a legal act ontologically linked to the contextual transfer, inter vivos or mortis causa, of the subjective legal situation that justifies the legitimate interest in being the holder of the favorable administrative act. Indeed, the transfer of a commercial activity loses its legal, economic and social significance if the buyer or the universal successor cannot benefit from the administrative act necessary to effectively carry out the activity. But, if the private subject is clearly in favor of a free transferability of the administrative act, it is also necessary to take into account the public interests protected by the administrative act, interests present both at the time of issue of the act and at the moment of the transfer of the authorized activity.Currently, administrative jurisprudence continues to consider administrative acts as strictly personal, stating that it is not possible to transfer an administrative act to a new beneficiary because it is issued in consideration of the person who benefits from it. However, if it is clear that we cannot speak of the transferability of those administrative acts that depend on strictly individual qualities, there seems to be no valid obstacle to the transfer of an act issued exclusively or mainly by reason of the objective activity to which it refers. The transferability of an administrative act in which the economic potential and the presence of technical prerequisites are more important than personal qualities could therefore be recognized, without threatening the public interest, which remains protected by the fact that the transfer of the administrative act is not a simple marketing between private subjects, but it is a legal act that can exercise its effects after issuing a specific authorization by the competent public administration. This administrative intervention is read by the jurisprudence as the issue of a new authorization but we believe that it must be interpreted and regulated as a preventive check only of the subjective elements required by law, because if there is a contextual transfer of the commercial company, such as an organization of resources, the compliance of the activity with the qualitative and quantitative criteria predetermined by the public administration has already been verified at the time of the issue of the administrative act : it would rather be necessary to subject the activity to subsequent periodic effective checks carried out by the competent administrations, aimed at verifying the compliance with the conditions set out in the transferred administrative act.Transfers of administrative acts are operations that involve significant legal risk, which should be understood and analyzed to best manage it. The aim of the research is to examine whether there are general and common criteria that can be used to solve theoretical and practical problems related to the transfer of administrative acts, with reference to private commercial activities and public service activities
Eriksson, Dan. "The GDPR's lawful basis of legitimate interest : Advice and review regarding the balancing operation as of GDPR Article 6.1 (f)." Thesis, Uppsala universitet, Juridiska institutionen, 2019. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-384252.
Full textЗолотухіна, Л. О. "Щодо захисту законних інтересів працівників та роботодавців." Thesis, Сумський державний університет, 2014. http://essuir.sumdu.edu.ua/handle/123456789/36745.
Full textGALLI, LUCA. "Gli interessi legittimi “fondamentali”. Il giudice amministrativo e le situazioni giuridiche di rilievo costituzionale." Doctoral thesis, Università degli Studi di Milano-Bicocca, 2018. http://hdl.handle.net/10281/199159.
Full textToday, the administrative judge is not the judge of the “fundamental” rights affected by the administrative powers. According to the jurisprudence of the Court of cassation, pronouncing as judge of the distribution of competences between administrative and ordinary jurisdiction, the administrative judge can decide on “fundamental” rights only when they fall among the fields belonging to his exclusive jurisdiction. This theory was elaborated by the same Court almost forty years ago, when it recognized the non-degradability of a “fundamental” right, which would flow as individual right from the Constitution to the individuals and which could not become a legitimate interest even if it faces the administrative power. On the one hand, this because the legitimate interest has been considered – for a long time – a legal position unable to ensure an adequate protection to the special value of the fundamental rights. On the other hand, this theory was conceived as an answer to a practical issue: to overcome the inadequacy of the judicial protection the administrative judge could offer to all the legal positions belonging to his jurisdiction, both “fundamental” or not. Formally denying the presence of public powers in the dispute involving “fundamental” rights, the ordinary judge has been able to syndicate the legitimacy of the administrative action, becoming a model for the protection the administrative judge should have guaranteed to the legal position object of his decisions. As any emergency solution, this cannot be considered an efficient response on the long term: beyond the lack of theoretical foundations, its inefficiency descends from the uncertainty of the boundaries of the “fundamental” rights as legal positions. Beyond the introduction of an additional variable that complicates the identification of the responsible judge, the risk was that of being in presence of two different legal safeguards for equally “fundamental” legal positions, according to the recognition of this fundamentality by the judge. Thus the importance of solving this problem. Therefore, it has been necessary to go into the heart of public law: the Constitution and the values subject to its recognition and protection, to argue for the opportunity to lead them back to the two legal positions provided for by the same “Fundamental” law, both individual rights and legitimate interests. Moreover, the process of overcoming this emergency is allowed by the recognition, both in doctrine and case-law, of the legitimate interest as a concrete position that arises and has dialogue with the administrative power to allow a full protection of the private interest inside a public-law relationship. Finally, the changes the administrative judge and process have undergone, culminated in the adoption of the code of the administrative process, have enormously resized the sense of urgency derived from the inefficiency of its protection, providing it with all the instruments that the ordinary judge had adopted to protect the “fundamental” rights affected by the administrative powers. Rather than the civilization of the administrative judge, this has caused his constitutionalisation, being provided with the necessary instruments to guarantee the effective protection of the individual position involved in the exercise of official authority, both “fundamental” or not. Admitting that this emergency has been overcome would therefore not exclude the complete safeguard of the “fundamental” legal positions, but it would also guarantee the respect of other constitutional provisions, such as those which recognize the administrative judge as a fundamental element of our institutional balance and, therefore, guarantee his specific responsibilities.
Burgess, Craig Neilson. "Identification of a suspect before being charged: legitimate freedom of speech or a threat to a fair trial?" Thesis, Queensland University of Technology, 2005. https://eprints.qut.edu.au/16178/1/Craig_Burgess_Thesis.pdf.
Full textBurgess, Craig Neilson. "Identification of a suspect before being charged: legitimate freedom of speech or a threat to a fair trial?" Queensland University of Technology, 2005. http://eprints.qut.edu.au/16178/.
Full textДенисова, А. М. "Законний інтерес як відображення правового розвитку." Thesis, Українська академія банківської справи Національного банку України, 2006. http://essuir.sumdu.edu.ua/handle/123456789/60724.
Full textGibb, Winna. "Informed consent : a liberal perspective." Thesis, Queensland University of Technology, 1998.
Find full textDufour, Maxime. "Clauses contractuelles et non-concurrence : approche de droit des affaires." Thesis, Bordeaux, 2016. http://www.theses.fr/2016BORD0316.
Full textIn the modern world, to guard themselves from damage and to protect at best their economical interests, companies use contractual techniques developed by usage such as non-compete clauses,confidentiality clauses, non-reaffiliation clauses and non-solicitation clauses. These clauses cover many fields of contractual legality, mixing contract law, labor law and business law. Their aim is to prohibit the co-contractor to practice a professional activity, to disclose secret information, or even to employ specific colleagues, or contributors. Thus, they are brought to restrict a fundamental freedom, specifically the freedom of trade and of industry. As a result, it appears necessary to formulate a common legal system for all these clauses so as to preserve on one side the protection of the economic activity of the companies et on the other side the safeguard of the economic freedom of the co-contractors subject to these clauses. The benefit of a common legal system is the anticipation of the conditions of validity and implementation of this type of clause. In this way, the cocontractants will not lack in foresight. The development of this common right is in two steps. This includes confirming their autonomy relative to the contracts in which they may be inserted and draw the necessary conclusions regarding their validity. The second step is relative to the implementation of these clauses. Their application is sensitive because it depends for the most part on the precision of their content. In case of a breach of contract, a large array of legal remedies is available to the aggrieved contractor to penalize the breach of contract
SILVESTRI, MAURO. "POTERE PUBBLICO E AUTOTUTELA AMMINISTRATIVA." Doctoral thesis, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 2019. http://hdl.handle.net/10280/61787.
Full textThe thesis focuses on the Italian system of so called autoprotection or selfprotection. This expression refers to the powers of public administration to revoke its own acts when deemed necessary to repair a vice of legitimacy or a vice of opportunity, without being bind to resort to the courts. Given the aim of this powers – the same of first grade powers plus a semi-judicial one – they are usually meant by judges and scholars as “widely discretionary”. Furthermore, it has always been believed that the choice to activate the correspondent proceeding is totally free for public administration; consequently, a demand of interested parties does not make binding the start of the procedure, opposite to what happens with administrative appeal proceedings. In recent years ECJ, ECHR and national case law has emboldened the limits to selfredress, making clear that legitimate expectations and the public interest to legal certainty must be taken into consideration and given sufficient protection. Lately, also the Legislator followed, making the annulment and the revocation harder to be put in effect when the first act is favorable to the addressed subject. In such cases, the revocation cannot be ordered for a mere reconsideration of already known circumstances (ius poenitendi) but only if new ones show up. At the same time, ex officio annulment is precluded after 18 months from the issuing of the first act, instead of the previous general limit of a “reasonable time”. On the other hand, the case law has apparently pointed out some hypothesis of mandatory annulment, such as for “anticomunitarian acts” and cost-producing acts. Based on these two orientation, some scholars suggested a global rethinking of the self-protection, its bases and its rules. The study analyzes the case law and the latest legislative reforms, proving that no mandatory annulment exists in the Italian legal system. Therefore, nor the ECJ principle of equivalence nor other principles require that selfredress become generally obliged. The thesis also aims to prove that selfprotection remains a discretionary power, in order to ensure that the contrasting needs (the rule of law on the one hand, and the legal certainty and legitimate expectation on the other hand) can be properly balanced in every decision, according to the Constitutional provision of article 97, which requires that both impartiality and good administration are pursued.
Books on the topic "Transferability of legitimate interest"
Great Britain. Parliament. House of Commons. Third Standing Committee on Delegated Legislation. Draft enterprise act 2002(Protection of legitimate interest) order of Legitimate Interests) Order 2003 Wednesday 21st May 2003 2003, Draft enterprise act 2002(Anticipated mergers) Order 2003: Wednesday 21 May 2003. London: Stationery Office, 2003.
Find full textUnlawful gain and legitimate profit in Islamic law: Riba, gharar, and Islamic banking. Cambridge [Cambridgeshire]: Cambridge University Press, 1986.
Find full text1951-, Ajaj Ahmad, ed. Unlawful gain and legitimate profit in Islamic law: Riba, gharar, and Islamic banking. 2nd ed. London: Graham & Trotman, 1992.
Find full textCommission, New Jersey Death Penalty Study. Public hearing before New Jersey Death Penalty Study Commission: Testimony concerning whether the death penalty serves a legitimate penological intent, such as deterrence; whether the penological interest in executing some of those guilty of murder is sufficiently compelling that the risk of an irreversible mistake is acceptable; whether the death penalty is consistent with evolving standards of decency : [July 19, 2006, Trenton, New Jersey]. Trenton, N.J: The Unit, 2006.
Find full textÖberg, PerOla. Interest Organizations in the Policy Process. Edited by Jon Pierre. Oxford University Press, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199665679.013.39.
Full textFlynn, Maurice. Big Mo's Guides : GDPR PREP PLAN - Steps 3 and 4 : Lawful Basis for Data, Correct Consent and Legitimate Interest: Data Privacy and Protection Policies, Processes, Plans and Templates. Independently Published, 2018.
Find full textSvantesson, Dan Jerker B. A New Jurisprudential Framework for Jurisdiction. Oxford University Press, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198795674.003.0003.
Full textPaul J, Conderman, and Sari Aurel. Part II Commentaries to Typical Sofa Rules, 20 Jurisdiction. Oxford University Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/law/9780198808404.003.0020.
Full textSergi, Anna, Alexandria Reid, Luca Storti, and Marleen Easton. Ports, Crime and Security. Policy Press, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1332/policypress/9781529217711.001.0001.
Full textMcShane, Katie. Truth and Goodness. Edited by Stephen M. Gardiner and Allen Thompson. Oxford University Press, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199941339.013.13.
Full textBook chapters on the topic "Transferability of legitimate interest"
Baur, Dorothea. "NGOs, Interest Groups and Activists." In NGOs as Legitimate Partners of Corporations, 115–21. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2254-5_11.
Full textSingh, Iknoor, Deepak P., and Anoop K. "On the Coherence of Fake News Articles." In ECML PKDD 2020 Workshops, 591–607. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-65965-3_42.
Full textLambertini, Roberto. "Old Wine in New Wineskins: William Ockham and the Common Good in Context." In Common Good and Self-Interest in Medieval and Early Modern Philosophy, 131–48. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2024. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-55304-2_8.
Full textMaire Vigueur, Jean-Claude. "Il testamento di Ercole I d’Este." In Reti Medievali E-Book, 207–23. Florence: Firenze University Press, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.36253/978-88-5518-423-6.12.
Full textLópez Gunn, Elena, Laura Vay, and Carlos Marcos. "A Reader’s Guide to Natural Assurance Schemes." In Water Security in a New World, 19–33. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-25308-9_2.
Full textMoerenhout, Tom. "Energy Subsidies." In The Palgrave Handbook of International Energy Economics, 545–65. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86884-0_27.
Full text"The legitimate national interest and legitimate global power." In The Planetary Interest, 47–54. Routledge, 2003. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203214091-13.
Full text"The ‘Legitimate General Interest’ and Broadcasting." In Broadcasting in the European Union: The Role of Public Interest in Competition Analysis, 67–85. The Hague: T.M.C. Asser Press, 2001. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-90-6704-451-6_4.
Full textHamer, Kenneth. "Legitimate Expectation." In Hamer's Professional Conduct Casebook, 819–22. 4th ed. Oxford University PressOxford, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192883384.003.0054.
Full textKirshner, Alexander S. "Opposition without Democracy." In Legitimate Opposition, 124–54. Yale University Press, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.12987/yale/9780300243468.003.0005.
Full textConference papers on the topic "Transferability of legitimate interest"
Kyi, Lin, Sushil Ammanaghatta Shivakumar, Cristiana Teixeira Santos, Franziska Roesner, Frederike Zufall, and Asia J. Biega. "Investigating Deceptive Design in GDPR’s Legitimate Interest." In CHI '23: CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3544548.3580637.
Full textTimoshenko, Mikhail A. "Legal Thinking As A Factor Of Legitimate Personality Behavior." In International Scientific Forum «National Interest, National Identity and National Security». European Publisher, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.15405/epsbs.2021.02.02.128.
Full textОздамирова, Лаура Мусатовна. "THE MAIN WAYS TO IMPROVE THE LEGAL SUPPORT OF THE LEGITIMATE INTERESTS OF THE INDIVIDUAL." In Образование. Культура. Общество: сборник избранных статей по материалам Международной научной конференции (Санкт-Петербург, Июнь 2020). Crossref, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.37539/ecs291.2020.67.78.041.
Full textRezgui, Zohra, and Amina Bassit. "Transferability Analysis of an Adversarial Attack on Gender Classification to Face Recognition." In 2021 International Conference of the Biometrics Special Interest Group (BIOSIG). IEEE, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/biosig52210.2021.9548308.
Full textMorel, Victor, Cristiana Santos, Viktor Fredholm, and Adam Thunberg. "Legitimate Interest is the New Consent - Large-Scale Measurement and Legal Compliance of IAB Europe TCF Paywalls." In CCS '23: ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security. New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3603216.3624966.
Full textMorawski, Wojciech. "The Tax Rulings – the Conflict Between the Principle of Legality and the Principle of Legitimate Expectations." In XVI International Scientific Conference "The Optimization of Organization and Legal Solutions concerning Public Revenues and Expenditures in Social Interest". Temida 2, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.15290/oolscprepi.2018.38.
Full textBean, Jonathan. "Cracking the Code: A New Perspective on Architectural Education." In 110th ACSA Annual Meeting Paper Proceedings. ACSA Press, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.35483/acsa.am.110.10.
Full textBuszynski, Mario E. "A Cost-Effective Method of Achieving Meaningful Citizen Participation in Public Roadway Pipeline Studies." In 1996 1st International Pipeline Conference. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 1996. http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/ipc1996-1809.
Full textSangelkar, Shraddha, and Daniel A. McAdams. "Formalizing User Activity–Product Function Association Based Design Rules for Universal Products." In ASME 2011 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference. ASMEDC, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/detc2011-47926.
Full textZhang, Yanci, and Han Yu. "Towards Verifiable Federated Learning." In Thirty-First International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence {IJCAI-22}. California: International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence Organization, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.24963/ijcai.2022/792.
Full textReports on the topic "Transferability of legitimate interest"
Rosenfeld and Kiefner. L52270 Basics of Metal Fatigue in Natural Gas Pipeline Systems - A Primer for Gas Pipeline Operators. Chantilly, Virginia: Pipeline Research Council International, Inc. (PRCI), November 2004. http://dx.doi.org/10.55274/r0010154.
Full text