Log in

Relevant bibliographies by topics / Tim Criticism and interpretation / Journal articles

Journal articles on the topic 'Tim Criticism and interpretation'

To see the other types of publications on this topic, follow the link: Tim Criticism and interpretation.

Author: Grafiati

Published: 10 December 2022

Last updated: 29 January 2023

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Consult the top 50 journal articles for your research on the topic 'Tim Criticism and interpretation.'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Browse journal articles on a wide variety of disciplines and organise your bibliography correctly.

1

Barnett, Paul W. "Authentein once More: A Response to L. E. Wilshire." Evangelical Quarterly: An International Review of Bible and Theology 66, no. 2 (September 6, 1994): 159–62. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/27725472-06602005.

Full text

Abstract:

The author explains why he understood L. E. Wilshire’s interpretation of authentein as a word used in connection with ‘murder ... crime’ or ‘authority’, notes that in a later paper Wilshire dropped the second of these possibilities in relation to 1 Tim. 2:12, and briefly criticises his hypothesis that church women in Ephesus were reacting violently against false teachers who were repudiating marriage and child-bearing.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

2

Lago, Pablo Antonio. "Interpretation and Legal Theory: as críticas de Andrei Marmor ao interpretativismo de Ronald Dworkin." Teoria Jurídica Contemporânea 2, no. 1 (November 7, 2017): 39. http://dx.doi.org/10.21875/tjc.v2i1.11883.

Full text

Abstract:

<p><strong>RESUMO:</strong></p><p><span id="docs-internal-guid-decdab21-6e60-7f17-85b2-a2ed5562f90b"><span>O presente artigo tem por objeto as principais críticas que Andrei Marmor, em seu livro </span><span>Interpretation and Legal Theory</span><span>, apresenta à concepção de interpretação defendida por Ronald Dworkin. Em um primeiro momento, Marmor sugere que, para Dworkin, toda e qualquer conclusão sobre o Direito seria objeto de interpretação, o que não seria correto quando analisamos, por exemplo, o modo como seguimos certas regras e convenções. Em um segundo momento, Marmor argumenta que a perspectiva dworkiniana defende uma objetividade impossível de ser alcançada na interpretação: o fato de que compartilhamos valores de natureza incomensurável, por exemplo, implica na impossibilidade de se considerar que uma interpretação será, todas as coisas consideradas, melhor que outra. Analisando tais críticas à luz das respostas que Dworkin ofereceu ou poderia ter oferecido, conclui-se que a visão de Marmor sobre a concepção dworkiniana de interpretação é incorreta, na medida em que ignora distinções que lhe são centrais, como a diferença entre “conceitos criteriais” e “conceitos interpretativos”, e sobre a natureza integrada dos valores que compartilhamos socialmente. Ainda assim, o debate entre ambos os autores ressalta sua clara natureza metodológica, sendo importante para a compreensão do “estado da arte” da Teoria do Direito contemporânea de vertente analítica.</span></span></p><p><strong>ABSTRACT:</strong></p><p dir="ltr"><span>This paper focuses on the main criticisms presented in Andrei Marmor’s </span><span>Interpretation and Legal Theory</span><span> to Ronald Dworkin’s conception of interpretation. In the first criticism, Marmor suggests that in Dworkin’s theory each and every conclusion about what the law is in a given case is a result of interpretation, which cannot be correct when we think, for example, about the way we follow certain rules and conventions. In the second criticism, Marmor argues Dworkin supports an impossible objectivity view on interpretation: the fact that we share values of incommensurable nature, for example, implies that it is impossible to consider that one interpretation can be the best, all things considered. Considering both criticisms and the answers that Dworkin offered or could have offered to it, this paper concludes Marmor's view about Dworkin's concept of interpretation is incorrect, considering that Marmor ignores central distinctions of Dworkinian thought, such as the difference between "criterial” and “interpretive” concepts, and about the integrated nature of values we share on society. Nevertheless, the debate emphasizes its methodological nature, and is important to understand the state of art of the analytical contemporary legal theory.</span></p><div><span><br /></span></div>

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

3

Lugo, Farides María. "Fusão mítica: o descenso de Orfeu aos infernos em "Onde andará Dulce Veiga?", de Caio Fernando Abreu." Jangada: crítica | literatura | artes, no. 7 (April 26, 2018): 65–76. http://dx.doi.org/10.35921/jangada.v0i7.106.

Full text

Abstract:

Resumo: Pretendemos mostrar como a figura mitológica do descenso de Orfeu aos infernos, em busca de sua amada Eurídice, tem núcleo na narrativa Onde andará Dulce Veiga?: Um romance B, de Caio Fernando Abreu. Mito clássico e romance estão fazendo uma fusão mítica, na qual o primeiro pode complementar a leitura analítica do segundo. Nesta pesquisa apresentaremos as coincidências entre os dois textos, com o objetivo de atingir uma interpretação válida e adequada do romance de Caio F., tudo isso tendo como base teórica a linha mitocrítica proposta por Gilbert Durand. Palavras-chave: Descenso de Orfeu, Onde andará Dulce Veiga?: Um romance B, fusão mítica, mitocrítica, Gilbert Durand. ___________________Abstract: We intend to show how the mythological figure of Orpheus's descent into hell in search of his beloved Eurydice, has core in the narrative Whatever happened to Dulce Veiga?, by Caio Fernando Abreu. Classic myth and romance are doing a mythical fusion, in which the first may complement the analytical reading of the second. In this research we present the similarities between the two texts, in order to achieve a valid and proper interpretation of the Caio F’s novel. All the theoretical background is based on Gilbert Durand’s Myth-Criticism. Keywords: Descent of Orpheus, Whatever happened to Dulce Veiga?, mythical fusion, Myth-Criticism, Gilbert Durand.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

4

Zaret, David, and Michael Walzer. "Interpretation and Social Criticism." Contemporary Sociology 17, no. 1 (January 1988): 122. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2069485.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

5

Senchuk, Dennis M., and Michael Walzer. "Interpretation and Social Criticism." Noûs 26, no. 3 (September 1992): 389. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2215966.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

6

Gorski, Philip S. "SCIENTISM, INTERPRETATION, AND CRITICISM." Zygon� 25, no. 3 (September 1990): 279–307. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9744.1990.tb00793.x.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

7

Rosen, Bernard. "Interpretation and Social Criticism." Journal of Higher Education 59, no. 6 (November 1988): 704–6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00221546.1988.11780237.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

8

Rosen, Bernard, and Michael Walzer. "Interpretation and Social Criticism." Journal of Higher Education 59, no. 6 (November 1988): 704. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1982241.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

9

Green, Joel B. "Rethinking "History" for Theological Interpretation." Journal of Theological Interpretation 5, no. 2 (2011): 159–73. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/26421422.

Full text

Abstract:

Abstract In recent years, theological interpretation of Christian Scripture has often been distinguished by its wholesale antipathy toward history and/or to historical criticism. Working with a typology of different forms of "historical criticism," this essay urges (1) that historical criticism understood as reconstruction of "what really happened" and/or historical criticism that assumes the necessary segregation of "facts" from "faith" is inimical to theological interpretation; (2) that this form of historical criticism is increasingly difficult to support in light of contemporary work in the philosophy of history; and (3) that contemporary theological interpretation is dependent on expressions of historical criticism concerned with the historical situation within which the biblical materials were generated, including the sociocultural conventions they take for granted.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

10

Green, Joel B. "Rethinking "History" for Theological Interpretation." Journal of Theological Interpretation 5, no. 2 (2011): 159–73. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/jtheointe.5.2.0159.

Full text

Abstract:

Abstract In recent years, theological interpretation of Christian Scripture has often been distinguished by its wholesale antipathy toward history and/or to historical criticism. Working with a typology of different forms of "historical criticism," this essay urges (1) that historical criticism understood as reconstruction of "what really happened" and/or historical criticism that assumes the necessary segregation of "facts" from "faith" is inimical to theological interpretation; (2) that this form of historical criticism is increasingly difficult to support in light of contemporary work in the philosophy of history; and (3) that contemporary theological interpretation is dependent on expressions of historical criticism concerned with the historical situation within which the biblical materials were generated, including the sociocultural conventions they take for granted.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

11

Morrow, Jeffrey L. "The Politics of Biblical Interpretation: A ‘Criticism of Criticism’." New Blackfriars 91, no. 1035 (August 12, 2010): 528–45. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-2005.2009.01342.x.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

12

Rosenberg, Ruth, and Jerome J. McGann. "Textual Criticism and Literary Interpretation." South Central Review 3, no. 4 (1986): 119. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3189693.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

13

Hudson, Anne. "Textual Criticism and Middle English Texts. Tim William Machan." Papers of the Bibliographical Society of America 89, no. 4 (December 1995): 481–82. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/pbsa.89.4.24304329.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

14

Davies, Paul, Greta Gaard, and Patrick D. Murphy. "Ecofeminist Literary Criticism: Theory, Interpretation, Pedagogy." Modern Language Review 95, no. 4 (October 2000): 1174. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3736723.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

15

Woodward, Michael. "Dictionary of Biblical Criticism and Interpretation." Theological Librarianship 2, no. 1 (April 27, 2009): 113–14. http://dx.doi.org/10.31046/tl.v2i1.74.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

16

Robbins, Vernon K. "New Testament Interpretation through Rhetorical Criticism." Rhetorica 3, no. 2 (1985): 145–49. http://dx.doi.org/10.1525/rh.1985.3.2.145.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

17

Fowler, Robert M., and George A. Kennedy. "New Testament Interpretation through Rhetorical Criticism." Journal of Biblical Literature 105, no. 2 (June 1986): 328. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3260415.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

18

Slater, Niall W. "‘Against Interpretation’: Petronius and art Criticism." Ramus 16, no. 1-2 (1987): 165–76. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0048671x00003295.

Full text

Abstract:

For forty years a debate has raged in Petronian studies between the moralists and, for want of a better term, the anti-moralists. From Highet in the 1940's to Bacon and Arrowsmith in the 1950's and 60's, the moralists held a certain advantage. Whatever important divergences there were among these critics, all agreed on a Petronius who stood in some critical relation to his society. The dissenting voices have grown much louder of late. Ironically, the literary brilliance of Arrowsmith's New Critical reading of the Satyricon helped to turn the tide against the moralist viewpoint. The more apparent the literary sophistication of the Satyricon has become, the less willing late twentieth century readers have been to see a programmatic moral critique as its main purpose. Sullivan's view of Petronius as a ‘literary opportunist’ has come to dominate the field.With Graham Anderson's book, Eros Sophistes: Ancient Novelists at Play, the retreat from the position of Highet is now complete. We have finally reached the logical, New Critical conclusion that the Satyricon is an entirely self-contained literary game without any message whatsoever; in effect we are told that, like any serious piece of literature, the Satyricon ‘should not mean, but be’. Anderson is eager to disavow ‘the unproven conviction that every work must have a message, however diffusely or perversely expressed’.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

19

Herbert, T. Walter, Roberta Rubenstein, and Amy Schrager Lang. "Feminist Literary Criticism and Cultural Interpretation." American Quarterly 39, no. 4 (1987): 656. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2713134.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

20

Evans, R. L. S., and George A. Kennedy. "New Testament Interpretation through Rhetorical Criticism." Classical World 80, no. 3 (1987): 222. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/4350026.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

21

Arutynyan, J. I. "Contemporary art criticism: judgment and interpretation." Vestnik of Saint Petersburg State University of Culture, no. 1 (30) (March 2017): 177–80. http://dx.doi.org/10.30725/2619-0303-2020-3-177-180.

Full text

Abstract:

An important question of contemporary art studies is the problem of expanding the methodological base of the discipline. Modern art criticism refl ects the fundamental problems of contemporary art. Clash of the axiological approaches and the principle of interpretation, subjectivity, the infl uence of requests of the art market and commercialization are the main problems of formation of the expressive language of art criticism in the 20th–21st centuries

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

22

Perry, John Oliver, and G. N. Devy. "Indian Literary Criticism: Theory and Interpretation." World Literature Today 77, no. 1 (2003): 95. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/40157830.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

23

Dietrich, Richard S. "Book Review: Interpretation and Social Criticism." Interpretation: A Journal of Bible and Theology 42, no. 3 (July 1988): 310–11. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/002096438804200315.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

24

Taylor, James E. "Hume on Miracles: Interpretation and Criticism." Philosophy Compass 2, no. 4 (July 2007): 611–24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-9991.2007.00088.x.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

25

Dmytrenko, V. "ARCHETYPE «SHADOW” IN «STALINKA” BY OLES ULYANENKO." Вісник Житомирського державного університету імені Івана Франка. Філологічні науки, no. 1(94) (July 2, 2021): 6–15. http://dx.doi.org/10.35433/philology.1(94).2021.6-15.

Full text

Abstract:

The article deals with Oles Ulyanenko’s first novel «Stalinka» (1994), which presented the appearance of a new extraordinary artist in literature. Today we have a lot of research for this novel and the writer’s works in general, with a radically opposite representation of the artistic component of his works. There are studies, and not only in which the artist is accused of immorality and other «sins», but also those that contain attempts to define the writer as a kind of seer. Such ambiguity and, at the same time, high appreciation of the work of the writer by P. Zahrebelnyi, who initiated the awarding to the novice writer of the unique Small Shevchenko Prize (1997) for the novel «Stalinka», as well as F. Shteinbuk’s monograph «Pid Znakom Savaofa» or «Tam, de …» Ulyanenko» (2020) opened new dimensions for the analysis of the writer’s work. It inspired the author of the publication to comprehend the work of the extraordinary artist from archetypal criticism. The selection of the archetype «shadow» is represented in work in various guises. It is dominant for understanding the characters of the work. The interpretation of the text with the selection of this archetype helps reveal new meanings encoded by the author and gives the work new dimensions in understanding the author’s hyperbole of human sins. The publication argues that the malignant transformation of the individual is the result of external influences associated with the totalitarian reality of Stalin’s time. The general situation in the country has objectified the «shadow” archetype as the collective unconscious in its worst manifestations. Man’s overcoming of his dark nature is presented in the novel through the image of Lord-Yonka, who undergoes a kind of initiation, i.e., a series of dedicated trials, and eventually overcomes the dark part of his soul, becomes ready for another life.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

26

Millett, Bella. "Textual Criticism and Middle English Texts by Tim William Machan." Studies in the Age of Chaucer 18, no. 1 (1996): 243–47. http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/sac.1996.0027.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

27

CAN GÜRBÜZ, Gülsevim. "Araştırıcı Sanat Eleştirisi ve Bir Sanat Eleştirisi Örneği." Journal of Social Research and Behavioral Sciences 7, no. 14 (December 10, 2021): 150–64. http://dx.doi.org/10.52096/jsrbs.7.14.7.

Full text

Abstract:

Art criticism can be described as an examination, determination, and mental activity that seeks the value of an art work. In an art criticism, different analysis strategies and methods can be chosen for the related artwork. Edmund Burke Feldman's “researching art criticism” criticism model, which is determined as a method in thearticle, is one of them. In th earticle, it is aimed to examine the method of “researching art criticism” in general, and in particular, to criticize Paula Rego’s artwork called “The Maids” with this method. For this criticism, “description, analysis, interpretation and judgment-evaluation” phases for the work were formed. Description and analysis subheadings are included in the “results section”. The other two subheadings, which include the relationship, interpretation and evaluation of the results section’s informations, are also considered as the “discussion section”. Keywords: Art criticism, Feldman model of criticism, Description, Analysis, İnterpretation, Judgment, Evaluation, Paula Rego, The Maids

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

28

Ridwan, MK. "TRADISI KRITIK TAFSIR: Diskursus Kritisisme Penafsiran dalam Wacana Qur’anic Studies." Jurnal THEOLOGIA 28, no. 1 (September 14, 2017): 55. http://dx.doi.org/10.21580/teo.2017.28.1.1418.

Full text

Abstract:

<div class="Section1"><p class="Iabstrak"><strong>Abstract: </strong><em>This paper aims to discuss the methodology of interpretation criticism in the qur'anic studies discourse. As new plots in the Qur'an studies, the interpretation criticism has not been much sought after by Qur’anic scholars. As a consequence, in methodological discourse has not yet found a definite method can be used to criticize an interpretation. As for the thought-provoking critique of the interpretation for this still are sporadic and likely are political-ideological. For that, it needs special attention in developing area studies the Quran towards the study criticism of interpretation. Finally, this paper gives the conclusion that, in the discourse of criticism the methodological framework needed interpretation, as a step towards the operational interpretation of criticism. So, the criticism was done not nuanced political-ideological, but able to uphold the values of objectivity, comprehensiveness, scientific and systematic. There are at least four operational steps in carrying out work interpretation of criticism of the region of ontology, epistemology, and axiology i.e; Firstly, the critic must understand the substance of exegesis are an interpretation as process and interpretation as a product. Secondly, understand the construction of criticism interpretation, namely the construction of the historicity of the critique, the base of criticism, the purpose of criticism, as well as the principles and parameters of criticism. Thirdly, start working with two regions exegesis critique work i.e; intrinsic and extrinsic criticism. Fourthly, give the evaluation and assessment of the object of study of criticism that is good and decent, or perverted and unworthy of being used.</em></p><p class="Iabstrak"><strong>Abstrak:</strong> Tulisan ini bertujuan untuk mendiskusikan metodologi kritik tafsir dalam diskursus wacana Qur’anic Studies. Sebagai wilayah garapan baru dalam studi al-Qur’an, kritik tafsir belum banyak diminati oleh kalangan sarjana al-Qur’an. Akibatnya, dalam wacana metodologis belum banyak ditemukan metodebaku yang dapat digunakan untuk mengkritisi sebuah tafsir. Adapun pemikiran kritik tafsir selama ini masih bersifat sporadis dan cenderung bersifat politis-ideologis. Untuk itulah dibutuhkan perhatian khusus dalam mengembangkan wilayah studi al-Qur’an ke arah studi kritik tafsir. Akhirnya, tulisan ini memberikan kesimpulan bahwa, dalam diskursus kritisisme penafsiran, dibutuhkan kerangka metodologis sebagai langkah operasional kritik tafsir. Sehingga, kritik yang dilakukan tidak bernuansa politis-ideologis, namun mampu mengedepankan nilai-nilai objektivitas, komprehensivitas, ilmiah dan sistematis. Setidaknya terdapat empat langkah operasional dalam melaksanakan kerja kritik tafsir yang bermuara pada wilayah ontologis, epistemologis, dan aksiologis yaitu; Pertama, kritikus harus terlebih dahulu memahami hakikat tafsir yakni tafsir sebagai proses (<em>interpretation as process</em>) dan tafsir sebagai produk (interpretation as product). Kedua, memahami konstruksi kritik tafsir, yaitu historisitas kritik, landasan kritik, tujuan kritik, serta prinsip dan parameter kritik. Ketiga, memulai kerja kritik tafsir dengan dua wilayah kerja yaitu; kritik intrinsik dan kritik ekstrinsik. Keempat, memberikan evaluasi dan penilaian terhadap objek kajian kritik yaitu, baik (<em>maḥmūd</em>) dan layak pakai (<em>maqbūl</em>), atau menyeleweng (<em>munḥarif</em>) dan tidak layak digunakan (<em>mardūd</em>).</p></div>

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

29

JEON, Kyung-Jin. "A Criticism of Immoralistic Interpretation of Nietzsche." Journal of the Daedong Philosophical Association 77 (December 31, 2016): 23–52. http://dx.doi.org/10.20539/deadong.2016.77.02.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

30

JEON, Kyung-Jin. "A Criticism of Immoralistic Interpretation of Nietzsche." Journal of the Daedong Philosophical Association 77 (December 31, 2016): 23–52. http://dx.doi.org/10.20539/deadong.2016.77.2.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

31

Jabborova, Dilafruz. "Interpretation of Fitrat Dramas in Literary Criticism." International Journal for Research in Applied Science and Engineering Technology 9, no. 12 (December 31, 2021): 2437–40. http://dx.doi.org/10.22214/ijraset.2021.39332.

Full text

Abstract:

Abstract: This article examines the fact that after the independence of Uzbekistan, the works of modern literature began to be reevaluated on the basis of new approaches. Literary scholar Ilhom Ganiev's monograph "Poetics of Fitrat dramas" is analyzed and the poetic world of the playwright is covered. The article is based on the analysis of the physicist's focus on Fitrat's character creation skills, the symbolic and figurative motives used in dramas, and the use of artistic language. Keywords and word expressions: drama, jadid literature, criticism, natural science, jadid studies, jadid writers, playwright, drama, symbolism, theater, tragedy, soviet ideology, “Abulfayzkhan”, confection, “Hindu ihtilotonzhon”, conflict, independence ideas, poetic thought, hermeneutic thinking, vulgar-sociological approach, principle, reassessment, new scientific and aesthetic thinking, systematic approach, analysis and interpretation, hermeneutics, synergetics, structuralism, historical-biographical approach, historical-cultural approach, modernism, absurdity, existentialism.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

32

Pelias, Ronald J. "Schools of interpretation thought and performance criticism." Southern Speech Communication Journal 50, no. 4 (December 1985): 348–65. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10417948509372640.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

33

NANNICELLI, TED. "Ethical Criticism and the Interpretation of Art." Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 75, no. 4 (October 2017): 401–13. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jaac.12395.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

34

Kaufman, Daniel A. "Interpretation and the “Investigative” Concept of Criticism." Angelaki 17, no. 1 (March 2012): 3–12. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0969725x.2012.671635.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

35

West, David W. "Practical Criticism: I.A. Richards' experiment in interpretation." Changing English 9, no. 2 (October 2002): 207–13. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1358684022000006311.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

36

Wicaksono, Arif. "Pandangan Kekristenan Tentang Higher Criticism." FIDEI: Jurnal Teologi Sistematika dan Praktika 1, no. 1 (June 23, 2018): 115–31. http://dx.doi.org/10.34081/fidei.v1i1.6.

Full text

Abstract:

The interpretation of the Bible in the present continues to grow rapidly. This progress has both positive and negative effects in the realm of biblical interpretation. The positive impact that is with the progress of interpretation, it was found many truth values that were not understood and now start out one by one. The negative as the progress of biblical interpretation is the loss of boundaries. With the method of high-criticism interpretation makes the Bible originally believed to be the infallible Word, and now it is equated with another book of lesser value than the scriptures. The Bible is aligned with the ordinary book, even the authority of the Bible as God's Word is in doubt, denied and demeaned to an ordinary literary work.This is a challenge for Christianity today. It takes a firm stance in the face of the Higher Criticism interpretation movement. Christians need to determine a position to deflect any allegations that undermine the authority of the Bible and any allegations that cast doubt on the inspiration and revelation of the existing Scriptures. This paper is expected to give a little apologetic response to the Higher Criticism movement Keywords: Higher Criticism, Apologetic, Bible AbstrakPenafsiran Alkitab dalam masa kini terus mengalami perkembangan dengan pesat. Kemajuan ini memberikan dampak positif maupun negative dalam ranah dunia tafsir Alkitab. Positive karena dengan kemajuannya banak nilai-nilai kebenaran yang dul tidak dipahami mulai keluar satu persatu. Negatifnya saat kemajuan penafsiran Alkitab kehilangan batasan, dengan metode penafsiran higher Critism menjadikan Alkitab yang awalnya diyakini sebagai Firman yang tanpa salah, layaknya buku lain yang nilainya lebih rendah dari kitab suci. Aklitab disejajarkan dengan buku biasa. Bahkah otoritas Alkitab sebagai Firman Allah diragukan, disangkal dan direndahkan sebatas karya sastra biasa.Ini merupakan tantangan bagai kekristenan saat ini. Diperlukan sikap yang tegas dalam menghadapi pergerakan penafsiran Higher Critism. Orang Kristen perlu menentukan posisi dalam menangkis segala tuduhan yang merendahkan otoritas Alkitab. Segala tuduhan yang meragukan pengilhaman dan pewahyuan penulisan kitab Suci yang ada. Tulisan ini diharapkan memberikan sedikit sikap apologetika terhadap gerakan Higer Critism Kata Kunci: Higer Critism, Apologet, Alkitab

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

37

Rabbany T, Al-Faiz M., and Indal Abror. "TAFSIR PROGRESIF ATAS KISAH-KISAH DALAM AL-QUR’AN KARYA EKO PRASETYO." Jurnal Studi Ilmu-ilmu Al-Qur'an dan Hadis 19, no. 1 (October 12, 2019): 85. http://dx.doi.org/10.14421/qh.2018.1901-05.

Full text

Abstract:

Kitab Pembebasan is Eko Prasetyo’s first work in the field of interpretation contains the stories of prophets and friends in the Qur'an. For him, the stories of the prophets no longer have the power to change circumstances, then progressive logic brings Eko to an interpretation of the stories of the prophet to the surrounding social problems. When many commentators who interpret the Quran relate to the social community, then interpreting the Quran leads to social criticism being unique to discuss. So this paper is focused on discussing social criticism in the Book of Liberation. In this paper, there are indications of the content of social criticism Eko Prasetyo then grouped them into five fields, namely economics, religion, education, politics and society. Then explained based on the theme specifically. Then develop social criticism based on each theme. Among them is a criticism of the economic system of capitalism, interpretation of the meaning of Satan, tyranny, seditious and idolatrous, religious and financiers, criticism of Suharto and the New Order, the case of the murderous activist Salim deer. Also, Eko's other works were reviewed to develop his criticisms. The interpretation for Eko through the Book of Liberation is the contextualization of the problems that occur around him, Eko does not care about the interpretation of the interpretation, because for Eko, the Qur'an is a book of movements that must be practiced.Keyword: Eko Prasetyo, Progressive Interpretations, Qissah, al-Qur’an

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

38

Moberly, R. W. L. "Biblical Criticism and Religious Belief." Journal of Theological Interpretation 2, no. 1 (2008): 71–100. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/26421447.

Full text

Abstract:

Abstract Moberly discusses John Barton's Nature of Biblical Criticism and takes issue with Barton's portrayal of theological interpretation as hostile to the values of biblical criticism. After showing how Barton misrepresents theological interpretation, not least because of a failure to do justice to the changing frames of reference of critical scholarship, Moberly extends the discussion to include the preunderstandings that interpreters inevitably bring to the Bible in ways analogous to how one reads a classic; the way in which appreciation of deep literature relates to personal maturity; and the way in which theological dogma, rightly understood, can make truer one's perception of reality.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

39

Moberly, R. W. L. "Biblical Criticism and Religious Belief." Journal of Theological Interpretation 2, no. 1 (2008): 71–100. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/jtheointe.2.1.0071.

Full text

Abstract:

Abstract Moberly discusses John Barton's Nature of Biblical Criticism and takes issue with Barton's portrayal of theological interpretation as hostile to the values of biblical criticism. After showing how Barton misrepresents theological interpretation, not least because of a failure to do justice to the changing frames of reference of critical scholarship, Moberly extends the discussion to include the preunderstandings that interpreters inevitably bring to the Bible in ways analogous to how one reads a classic; the way in which appreciation of deep literature relates to personal maturity; and the way in which theological dogma, rightly understood, can make truer one's perception of reality.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

40

Uniłowski, Krzysztof, and Jakob Ziguras. "Textualism, Materialism, Immersion, Interpretation." Praktyka Teoretyczna 34, no. 4 (December 15, 2019): 13–31. http://dx.doi.org/10.14746/prt2019.4.2.

Full text

Abstract:

Krzysztof Uniłowski passed away earlier this December. For the last twenty years, he has been crucial to Polish literary studies. Writing on a broad range of topics – from reviews of contemporary Polish novels to essays on the idea of modernity, from class-oriented analyses of sci-fi books and TV shows to comments on the politics and ethics of literary criticism – he developed an impressive and highly unique critical perspective, or indeed: a unique language of criticism, one that has managed and will undoubtedly still manage to inspire countless critics of all generations. Throughout his work, Uniłowski drew heavily on historical materialism, constantly balancing his instinctive focus on the political – and, specifically, on class – with his equally instinctive conviction as to the irreplaceability of literary form. While we might not have agreed on every single issue – as is always the case on the Left – we in “Praktyka Teoretyczna” are proud to have called him not just an inspiration, but a comrade. Uniłowski passed away while putting finishing touches to the essay we’re presenting below. Unfortunately, he never managed to send us the finished abstract/summary for this article, so it falls to us to try and summarise its main theses. Krzysztof Uniłowski passed away earlier this December. For the last twenty years, he has been crucial to Polish literary studies. Writing on a broad range of topics – from reviews of contemporary Polish novels to essays on the idea of modernity, from class-oriented analyses of sci-fi books and TV shows to comments on the politics and ethics of literary criticism – he developed an impressive and highly unique critical perspective, or indeed: a unique language of criticism, one that has managed and will undoubtedly still manage to inspire countless critics of all generations. Throughout his work, Uniłowski drew heavily on historical materialism, constantly balancing his instinctive focus on the political – and, specifically, on class – with his equally instinctive conviction as to the irreplaceability of literary form. While we might not have agreed on every single issue – as is always the case on the Left – we in “Praktyka Teoretyczna” are proud to have called him not just an inspiration, but a comrade. Uniłowski passed away while putting finishing touches to the essay we’re presenting below. Unfortunately, he never managed to send us the finished abstract/summary for this article, so it falls to us to try and summarise its main theses.Krzysztof Uniłowski passed away earlier this December. For the last twenty years, he has been crucial to Polish literary studies. Writing on a broad range of topics – from reviews of contemporary Polish novels to essays on the idea of modernity, from class-oriented analyses of sci-fi books and TV shows to comments on the politics and ethics of literary criticism – he developed an impressive and highly unique critical perspective, or indeed: a unique language of criticism, one that has managed and will undoubtedly still manage to inspire countless critics of all generations. Throughout his work, Uniłowski drew heavily on historical materialism, constantly balancing his instinctive focus on the political – and, specifically, on class – with his equally instinctive conviction as to the irreplaceability of literary form. While we might not have agreed on every single issue – as is always the case on the Left– we in “Praktyka Teoretyczna” are proud to have called him not just an inspiration, but a comrade. Uniłowski passed away while putting finishing touches to the essay we’re presenting below. Unfortunately, he never managed to send us the finished abstract/summary for this article, so it falls to us to try and summarise its main theses. The issues raised in this erudite and formally complex piece include such fundamental questions as: in what sense do the fictional worlds resemble the non-fictional one, and how do we inhabit them? What’s the relationship between immersion and interpretation? What real-life figures can help us imagine or visualise our intimate yet inherently social relationship with the fictional (are we guests, dwellers, passersby...)? Uniłowski looks for answers in contemporary Marxist criticism (Eagleton, Jameson, Berardi), sci-fi and fantasy writing (Lem, Sapkowski, Martin), as well as modern continental philoso phy (Gadamer, Heidegger) and – in the last part of the essay – contemporary game studies. We’re happy to be able to present Uniłowski’s piece in two versions, the original Polish as well as its English translation (by Jakob Ziguras). In order to preserve the unmistakable flow of Uniłowski’s thought in English, small changes were introduced – with the author’s full approval – in the English version. We trust that our Polish-speaking readers will fin the comparison of the two versions interesting and instruc tive, as they seem to give a unique insight into Uniłowski’s writing process.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

41

이재호. "An Interpretation of Criticism of Elementary Moral Instruction." KOREAN ELEMENTARY MORAL EDUCATION SOCIETY ll, no. 31 (December 2009): 117–40. http://dx.doi.org/10.17282/ethics.2009..31.117.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

42

Song, Youngmog. "Textual Criticism and Interpretation of Matthew 23:26." Journal of Biblical Text Research 50 (April 30, 2022): 60–86. http://dx.doi.org/10.28977/jbtr.2022.4.50.60.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

43

Sam-Yel Park. "Spinoza and Idealism -The Criticism of Idealistic Interpretation-." Studies in Philosophy East-West ll, no. 49 (September 2008): 297–315. http://dx.doi.org/10.15841/kspew..49.200809.297.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

44

Kermode, Frank. "Book Review: New Testament Interpretation Through Rhetorical Criticism." Theology 88, no. 724 (July 1985): 309–10. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0040571x8508800422.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

45

Körner, Jürgen. "Social criticism in the process of interpretation (discussion)." International Forum of Psychoanalysis 2, no. 2 (July 1993): 115–19. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08037069308412455.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

46

Kingsbury, Jack Dean. "Book Review: New Testament Interpretation through Rhetorical Criticism." Interpretation: A Journal of Bible and Theology 40, no. 1 (January 1986): 91–92. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/002096438604000121.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

47

Vinson, Richard B. "Book Review: New Testament Interpretation through Rhetorical Criticism." Review & Expositor 83, no. 1 (February 1986): 113–14. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/003463738608300113.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

48

Luque, José Luis Alexis Rivera. "Alexander Fidora Nicola Polloni: Appropriation, interpretation and criticism." Journal of Transcultural Medieval Studies 5, no. 2 (November 1, 2018): 388–93. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/jtms-2018-0027.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

49

Bender, R., and P. T. Sawicki. "Interpretation of study's results is open to criticism." BMJ 312, no. 7025 (January 27, 1996): 254. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.312.7025.254.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

50

Bailin, Sharon. "Aesthetic Criticism, Interpretation, and the Creation of Ideals." Philosophy of Education 65 (2009): 39–42. http://dx.doi.org/10.47925/2009.039.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!