Books on the topic 'Test validity'

Howard, Wainer, Braun Henry I. 1949-, and Educational Testing Service, eds. Test validity. Hillsdale, N.J: L. Erlbaum Associates, 1988.

Boldt, Robert F. Generalization of SAT validity across colleges. New York: College Entrance Examination Board, 1986.

Roussos, Louis A. LSAT item-type validity study. Newtown, PA: Law School Admission Council, 1998.

Roussos, Louis A. LSAT item-type validity study. Newtown, PA: Law School Admission Council, 1998.

E, Robbins Douglas, and Sawicki Robert F, eds. Reliability and validity in neuropsychological assessment. New York: Plenum Press, 1989.

Franzen, Michael D. Reliability and validity in neuropsychological assessment. 2nd ed. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, 2000.

Boldt, Robert F. The validity of various methods of treating multiple SAT scores. New York (Box 886, New York 10101): College Entrance Examination Board, 1986.

A, Shepard Lorrie, ed. Methods for identifying biased test items. Thousand Oaks [Calif.]: Sage Publications, 1994.

Statistical significance: Rationale, validity, and utility. London: Sage Publications, 1996.

Daniel, Slick, ed. VSVT, Victoria Symptom Validity Test: Version 1.0, professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources, 1997.

Hardison, Chaitra M. The Air Force Officer Qualifying Test: Validity, fairness, and bias. Santa Monica, CA: RAND, 2010.

Hardison, Chaitra M. The Air Force Officer Qualifying Test: Validity, fairness, and bias. Santa Monica, CA: RAND, 2009.

Hardison, Chaitra M. The Air Force Officer Qualifying Test: Validity, fairness, and bias. Santa Monica, CA: RAND, 2009.

Hahn, Jinyong. A new specification test for the validity of instrumental variables. Cambridge, Mass: Dept. of Economics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1999.

S, Sims Carra, and Wong Eunice C, eds. The Air Force Officer Qualifying Test: Validity, fairness, and bias. Santa Monica, CA: RAND, 2009.

Linn, Robert L. Problem choice by test takers: Implications for comparability and construct validity. Los Angeles, CA: Center for the Study of Evaluation, National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing, Graduate School of Education & Information Studies, University of California, Los Angeles, 1998.

Noble, Julie. Predicting grades in specific college freshman courses from ACT test scores and self-reported high school grades. Iowa City, Iowa: American College Testing Program, 1988.

Lyn, Bourque Mary, Brennan Robert L, Carr Peggy, Haertel Edward H, Jaeger R. M, Linn Robert L, Messick Samuel, et al., eds. Technical issues in large-scale performance assessment. Washington DC: National Centre for Education Statistics, 1996.

Battery, National Research Council (U S. ). Committee on the General Aptitude Test. Fairness in employment testing: Validity generalization, minority issues, and the General Aptitude Test Battery. Washington, D.C: National Academy Press, 1989.

E, Thornton Andrea, and Law School Admission Council, eds. Predictive validity of accommodated LSAT scores. Newtown, PA: Law School Admission Council, 2002.

W, Holland Paul, Wainer Howard, and Educational Testing Service, eds. Differential item functioning: Theory and practice. Hillsdale, N.J: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1992.

W, Holland Paul, Wainer Howard, and Educational Testing Service, eds. Differential item functioning. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1993.

Dickinson, Terry L. Work performance ratings: Measurement test bed for validity and accuracy research. Brooks Air Force Base, Tex: Air Force Systems Command, Air Force Human Resources Laboratory, 1989.

Aryadoust, Vahid. Building a validity argument for a listening test of academic proficiency. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Pub., 2013.

C, Heil Michael, Manning Carol A, United States. Office of Aviation Medicine., Civil Aeromedical Institute, and Human Resources Research Organization, eds. Documentation of validity for the AT-SAT computerized test battery: Final report. Washington, D.C: U.S. Dept. of Transportation, Federal Aviation Administration, Office of Aviation Medicine, 2001.

Diamond-Dalessandro, Susan. The validity of law school admission test scores for repeaters: A replication. Newtown, PA: Law School Admission Council/Law School Admission Services, 1999.

Wightman, Linda F. The validity of law school admission test scores for repeaters: A replication. Newtown, PA: Law School Admission Council/Law School Admission Services, 1990.

Ragosta, Marjorie. Performance and persistance: A validity study of the SAT for students with disabilities. New York: College Entrance Examination Board, 1991.

1943-, Allan Richard G., Nassif Paula M, Elliot Scott M, and National Evaluation Systems inc, eds. Bias issues in teacher certification testing. Hillsdale, N.J: L. Erlbaum Associates, 1988.

United States Commission on Civil Rights., ed. The validity of testing in education and employment: A report of the United States Commission on Civil Rights. [Washington, D.C.]: The Commission, 1993.

Guillermo, Solano Flores, ed. Cultural validity in assessment: Addressing linguistic and cultural diversity. New York, NY: Routledge, 2011.

Henning, Grant. Test-retest analyses of the test of English as a foreign language. Princeton, N.J: Educational Testing Service, 1993.

Ragosta, Marjorie. Performance and persistence: A validity study of the SAT for students with disabilities. New York: College Entrance Examination Board, 1991.

Test accommodations for students with disabilities. Springfield, Ill: C.C. Thomas Publishers, 1998.

1955-, Chapelle Carol A., Enright Mary, and Jamieson Joan, eds. Building a validity argument for the Test of English as a Foreign Language. New York: Routledge, 2008.

Malone, Margaret Eileen. The development of the English-speaking test: An investigation of reliability and validity. Ann Arbor: Bell & Howell Information and Learning Company, 1999.

1952-, Murphy Patricia, ed. A fair test?: Assessment, achievement, and equity. Buckingham [England]: Open University Press, 1994.

J, Milburn Nelda, Mertens Henry W, United States. Office of Aviation Medicine., and Civil Aerospace Medical Institute, eds. Predictive validity of the aviation lights test for testing pilots with color vision deficiencies. Washington, D.C: Office of Aviation Medicine, U.S. Dept. of Transportation, Federal Aviation Administration, 2004.

Test validity and language background: A study of Hispanic American students at six universities. New York: College Entrance Examination Board, 1990.

Hartke, Darrell D. Validity of the academic aptitude composite of the Air Force Officer Qualifying Test (AFOQT). Brooks Air Force Base, Tex: Air Force Human Resources Laboratory, Air Force Systems Command, 1988.

Mark, Pomplun, ed. An analysis of English composition test essay prompts for differential difficulty. New York: College Entrance Examination Board, 1992.

Stilwell, Lisa Anthony. The validity of Law School Admission Test scores for repeaters: 1997 through 2000 entering law school classes. Newtown, PA: Law School Admission Council, 2005.

T, Frase Lawrence, ed. Computer analysis of the TOEFL test of written English. Princeton, N.J: Educational Testing Service, 1999.

Wainer, Howard. How reliable is the TOEFL test? Princeton, N.J: Educational Testing Service, 1997.

Test scores and what they mean. 4th ed. Englewood Cliffs, N.J: Prentice-Hall, 1986.

Wainer, Howard, and Henry I. Braun, eds. Test Validity. Routledge, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203056905.

Test Validity. Routledge, 2013.

Wainer, Howard, and Henry I. Braun. Test Validity. Taylor & Francis Group, 2013.

Wainer, Howard, and Henry I. Braun. Test Validity. Taylor & Francis Group, 2013.

Markus, Keith A., and Denny Borsboom. Frontiers of Test Validity Theory. Routledge, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203501207.