Academic literature on the topic 'Territory, National South China Sea'
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Territory, National South China Sea.'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Journal articles on the topic "Territory, National South China Sea"
Farida, Qurotul ‘Aini Septi. "The Conflict of South China Sea and Impact on Indonesia’s National Interest." International Journal of Social Science And Human Research 05, no. 08 (August 26, 2022): 3670–74. http://dx.doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v5-i8-45.
Full textHa Trang, Nguyen. "The South China Sea issue in U.S. - Vietnam relations under President B. Obama." Science & Technology Development Journal - Social Sciences & Humanities 3, no. 3 (February 28, 2020): 152–61. http://dx.doi.org/10.32508/stdjssh.v3i3.525.
Full textArjun. "Shiv Shanker Menon, Choices: Inside the Making of India’s Foreign Policy." Jindal Journal of International Affairs 2, no. 4 (December 1, 2020): 96–98. http://dx.doi.org/10.54945/jjia.v2i4.71.
Full textDipua, Angkasa, Lukman Yudho Prakoso, and Dikry Rizanny Nurdiansyah. "ANALYSIS OF DEFENSE STRATEGY POLICIES IN DEALING WITH THE POTENTIAL NEGATIVE IMPACTS OF THE SOUTH CHINA SEA CONFLICT." Jurnal Pertahanan: Media Informasi ttg Kajian & Strategi Pertahanan yang Mengedepankan Identity, Nasionalism & Integrity 7, no. 1 (April 30, 2021): 89. http://dx.doi.org/10.33172/jp.v7i1.860.
Full textMakmur, E. E. S., W. Fitria, A. S. Praja, S. P. Rahayu, B. E. Pratama, R. S. S. Sudewi, H. Harsa, et al. "Strengthening the Early Detection and Tracking of Tropical Cyclones near Indonesian Waters." IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science 925, no. 1 (November 1, 2021): 012010. http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/925/1/012010.
Full textLukin, A., and I. Denisov. "Russia and the Conception of “Pivot to Asia”." Journal of International Analytics, no. 1 (March 28, 2015): 194–203. http://dx.doi.org/10.46272/2587-8476-2015-0-1-194-203.
Full textPrawira, Muhammad Rizky. "SOUTH CHINA SEA DISPUTE." Jurnal Dinamika Global 3, no. 02 (January 2, 2019): 35–54. http://dx.doi.org/10.36859/jdg.v3i02.75.
Full textКнязев, Ю. П. "World natural and cultural-natural heritage of china: current state, problems, development prospects." Tihookeanskaia geografiia, no. 1(5) (April 1, 2021): 63–69. http://dx.doi.org/10.35735/tig.2021.5.1.006.
Full textSaunders, Imogen. "The South China Sea Award, Artificial Islands and Territory." Australian Year Book of International Law Online 34, no. 1 (2017): 31–39. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/26660229-034-01-900000004.
Full textSuciningtyas, Pangesti. "The South China Sea Disputes in International Law Perspective." Digest: Journal of Jurisprudence and Legisprudence 2, no. 1 (June 30, 2021): 117–42. http://dx.doi.org/10.15294/digest.v2i1.48634.
Full textDissertations / Theses on the topic "Territory, National South China Sea"
Jackson, John W. "China in the South China Sea genuine multilateralism or a wolf in sheep's clothing?" Thesis, Monterey, California. Naval Postgraduate School, 2005. http://hdl.handle.net/10945/9984.
Full textDenny, Martin Anthony. "Regional strategic considerations in the Spratly Islands dispute." Thesis, Hong Kong : University of Hong Kong, 1997. http://sunzi.lib.hku.hk/hkuto/record.jsp?B18061515.
Full textChung, Christopher. "The Spratly Islands dispute decision units and domestic politics /." [Canberra, Australia] : University of New South Wales, Australian Defence Force Academy, School of Humanities and Social Science, 2004. http://handle.unsw.edu.au/1959.4/38658.
Full textWang, Tung-Sheng, and 王同生. "Studies on Hu Jintao’s South China Sea Strategy (2002-2012)—A National Security Strategy Perspective." Thesis, 2014. http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/v9usaj.
Full text淡江大學
國際事務與戰略研究所碩士在職專班
102
Title of Thesis:Studies on Hu Jintao’s South China Sea Strategy (2002-2012)— A National Security Strategy Perspective Pages :128 Key Words:National Security, Chinese Foreign Policy, South China Sea disputes, Relationship between China and ASEAN Name of Institute:Graduate Institute of International Affairs and Strategic Studies, Tamkang University Graduate Date:June, 2014 Degree Conferred:M.A.(Master of Arts) Name of Student:Wang, Tung-Sheng Advisor:Dr. Shih, Cheng-Chuan (王同生) (施正權 博士) Abstract: In this study, the author will explore the China’s South China Sea and analyze it from the viewpoint of national security strategy. Under the China’s South China Sea strategy, with fast economic growth and China’s rising, the Chinese foreign policy within the region has been changed in economic and military affairs. Despite of increasing territorial disputes among the other claimants within the region, China’s good-neighbor-policy has been held since 2002. The South China Sea strategy has been gradually formed during the Hu Jintao administration. Under the strategy, China’s military strategy has been transformed from defensive into offensive form. This change shows that China has a strong intention to be a leading power in the Asia Pacific. Originally, the obscure disputes and conflict in the Cold War, however, tensions escalated among claimants and related powers in the post-Cold War era over there, the China’s South China Sea Strategy has been gradually changed. For the sake of mineral resources and safe shipping routes, strategic rebalance toward the Asia-Pacific, the United States and the other related powers are very concerned about that. With China’s rising, the strong will in maintaining the sovereign within the region, China’s South Sea strategy will be fundamentally in pursuit of national interest and security. China’s South Sea strategy with a national security strategy perspective will be more clearly analyzed.
于宜宏. "The Investigation on The Territorial Disputes in The South China Sea: The Impact on The National Security of Republic of China (Taiwan)." Thesis, 2016. http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/z23v78.
Full text國立政治大學
國家安全與大陸研究碩士在職專班
104
The South China Sea is one of the primary corridor for the Asia-Pacific region to the world. It is also the second most used sea lane in the world while the volume of transportation is one third of total world volume; over 50% of supertankers in the world passes through this area to mainland China, Taiwan, Japan and Korea every year. Furthermore, the South China Sea is also the dominant channel for the East Asian countries to transport the commodities and materials of energy. Currently, 85% of transportation of petroleum exported to China, Taiwan, Japan, and Korea indispensably passes through this area; 90% of commodities imported to the United States of America from the East Asian countries also pass through this lane for the delivery to the North America area. Obviously, the South China Sea is not only significant to Taiwan, but regional countries of this area, even worldwide nations. The territorial disputes in the South China Sea is an extremely complicated issue and this issue involves the dominances of history, politics, economics and laws. The United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) is subject to specify the maritime jurisdiction and sovereignty of coastal states. Nevertheless, some of the articles are still ambiguous and cause the issues on the maritime boundary, and such issues on conflict of sovereignty of the South China Sea Islands and the affiliated resources involve China, Taiwan, Vietnam, Malaysia, Brunei, and Philippine. Therefore, the issues on the South China Sea will not be only on the territorial disputes; but the disputes and conflict of determination of islands and reefs, and maritime boundary will be the principal cause of disputes and affect the maritime rights and interests on regional countries. Currently, what the dilemma of Taiwan is the diplomatic balance among the United States, Japan, ASEAN, and China. If the Cross-Strait relations is intimate, this will cause the misperceptions and distrust on the issues of disputes in South China Sea from the United States, Japan and ASEAN, and worsen diplomatic and trade relations with these countries. Alternatively, the Cross-Strait relations will be worse if Taiwan aligns the relations more closely with the United States, Japan, and ASEAN, the Cross-Strait Relations will deteriorate, and China will suppress the participation in the international community of Taiwan, therefore, Taiwan may confront the risk of economics and national security. Nowadays, the newly appointed government officials deliberately alienate themselves or exclude from China in foreign relations and trade policy, and such intention implies the officials would alter or eliminate the policy “Remain a peaceful situation with China, establish a friendly relationship with Japan, and strengthen a close cooperation with the United States”. That would evolve the far-reaching effects for the future of developments in Taiwan.
Bančanský, Andrej. "Rozdíly v řešení sporů o námořní teritoria v oblastech s energetickými surovinami." Master's thesis, 2014. http://www.nusl.cz/ntk/nusl-337397.
Full textDobkowska, Joanna. "ASEAN jako platforma realizacji interesów państw Azji Południowo- Wschodniej wobec Chińskiej Republiki Ludowej." Doctoral thesis, 2018. https://depotuw.ceon.pl/handle/item/2664.
Full textThe topic of the dissertation was the role of the Association of South-East Asian Nations (ASEAN) in advancing of its member states’ national interests in relation to People’s Republic of China (PRC). The main goal was to ascertain the correlation between a state’s membership in an international organization, and the fulfilment of its national interests, using the examples of ASEAN and the PRC. The main hypothesis predicted that ASEAN is not an effective means of advancing the national interests of its member states in relation to the PRC due to the fact that their interests are too diverse or even contradictory, which hinders forming possible coalitions within the Association. There is also no clear correlation between the relative significance of a state within ASEAN and the degree of fulfilment of its interests. However it will not cause the dissolution of ASEAN as its institutional support in relations with China is considered crucial by all members – even those whose particular interests are not promoted by the Association. To verify the main hypothesis, the topic was divided into two main questions. Firstly, to ascertain the particular interests of each member state of ASEAN in relation to China; secondly, to what degree the membership in ASEAN promotes or hinders the fulfilment of the aforementioned interests. To determine the member states’ interests, the author proposed a model of analysis based on the concept introduced by Ian Tsung-Yen Chen and Alan Hao Yang (2013) which refers to the balance of threat theory by Stephen Walt (1996) and the theory of expected economic gains by Dale Copeland (1996). The purpose of the proposed model was to analyse the members’ interests towards China based on their perception of threat and expected gains of the economic cooperation, acknowledging also the historical context. The model was used in ten case studies which allowed to determine perceptions, and then interests and preferences of each ASEAN member state. Furthermore, the author identified two key factors influencing the ability of a state to advance its interests within ASEAN, namely its relative significance within the organization and the decision-making process – specifically, the meta-regime of decision-making (the ASEAN Way). This allowed to identify the potential groups of interest within the Association, as well as to evaluate the effectiveness of ASEAN as a means of advancing the national interests. The evaluation was based on two case studies related to the main areas of the Association’s activity: international security (the case of the territorial dispute on the South China Sea) and economic cooperation (the case of ACFTA). The conclusions of the analysis allowed to confirm the main hypothesis. What is more, the differing preferences for utilization of ASEAN as a means of conducting foreign policy were identified as another crucial factor affecting the Association’s effectiveness. Nevertheless, according the prognoses based on the presented conclusions ASEAN will remain a central actor in the regional cooperation, as well as a vital tool of its member states foreign policy towards China.
Books on the topic "Territory, National South China Sea"
Prescott, J. R. V. The South China Sea: Limits of national claims. Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia: Maritime Institute of Malaysia, 1996.
Find full textSnyder, Craig. Making mischief in the South China Sea? [Toronto, Ont. ]: Canadian Consortium on Asia Pacific Security, 1995.
Find full textBuntoro, Kresno. Indonesia, ASEAN, and South China Sea: The implications and problems. Jakarta: Maritime Security Coordinating Board, 2012.
Find full textKeyuan, Zou, ed. Maritime security in the South China Sea: Regional implications and international cooperation. Burlington, VT: Ashgate, 2010.
Find full textInstitute, Australian Strategic Policy. Maritime confidence building measures in the South China Sea conference. [Canberra]: Australian Strategic Policy Institute, 2013.
Find full textChina's strategic interests in the South China Sea: Power and resources. London: Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group, 2014.
Find full textNan Hai kai fa yu an quan zhan lüe: South China Sea development and national security. Haikou Shi: Xue xi chu ban she, 2013.
Find full textNguyen, Nhã, and Vinh-Thé Lâm. Vietnam Territoriality and the South China Sea. Taylor & Francis Group, 2018.
Find full textPrescott, Victor. Limits of National Claims in the South China Sea. Asean Academic Pr Ltd, 2000.
Find full textHoulden, Gordon, and Scott Romaniuk. Security, Strategy, and Military Dynamics in South China Sea: Cross-National Perspectives. Bristol University Press, 2021.
Find full textBook chapters on the topic "Territory, National South China Sea"
Batra, Geeta, and Trond Norheim. "Staying Small and Beautiful: Enhancing Sustainability in the Small Island Developing States." In Transformational Change for People and the Planet, 73–91. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-78853-7_6.
Full textTønnesson, Stein. "China’s national interests and the law of the sea." In Recent Developments in the South China Sea Dispute, 199–227. Routledge, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781315818696-13.
Full textDUAN, Kejing. "An Assessment of the Strategic Situation in the South China Sea." In International Strategic Relations and China's National Security, 243–64. WORLD SCIENTIFIC, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/9789813230682_0012.
Full text"Marine Protected Areas in the National Laws of China, The Philippines and Vietnam." In Marine Protected Areas Network in the South China Sea, 157–91. Brill | Nijhoff, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/9789004266353_006.
Full text"Models for Maritime Collaboration in the South China Sea: National-level Coordination." In Cooperation and Engagement in the Asia-Pacific Region, 391–414. Brill | Nijhoff, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/9789004412026_021.
Full textDUAN, Kejing. "Freedom of Navigation and the Sino-U.S. Struggle on the South China Sea Issue." In International Strategic Relations and China's National Security, 261–79. World Scientific, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/9789813144941_0013.
Full text"China National Offshore Oil Corporation and the Management of Resource Disputes in the South China Sea and the East China Sea." In International Agreements between Non-State Actors as a Source of International Law. Hart Publishing, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.5040/9781509951130.ch-005.
Full textLim, Kheng Swe, and Mingjiang Li. "The South China Sea Disputes and Their Strategic Implications for the Asia-Pacific Region." In International Strategic Relations and China's National SecurityVolume 1, 81–99. WORLD SCIENTIFIC, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/9789814675741_0005.
Full textHải, Đỗ Thanh, and Nguyễn Thị Linh. "Vietnam and the East Sea in Its Strategic Thinking." In Security, Strategy, and Military Dynamics in South China Sea, 101–16. Policy Press, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1332/policypress/9781529213454.003.0006.
Full textTseng, Hui-Yi Katherine. "The South China Sea Dispute: Regional Integration, Status Ad Quem, and Singapore’s Position." In Security, Strategy, and Military Dynamics in South China Sea, 179–92. Policy Press, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1332/policypress/9781529213454.003.0010.
Full textConference papers on the topic "Territory, National South China Sea"
He, Jincai, and Wanzheng Ai. "The feature of double typhoon in South China Sea and ship avoiding measures." In 2016 National Convention on Sports Science of China, edited by Z. Henan and J. Y. Beijing. Les Ulis, France: EDP Sciences, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/ncssc/201701042.
Full textRahmadini, Anggia, and Citra Hennida. "National Identity Analysis and Foreign Policy China Aggressive Stance in South China Sea under Xi Jinping." In Airlangga Conference on International Relations. SCITEPRESS - Science and Technology Publications, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.5220/0010278404340440.
Full textAn, Kun, Lawrence Khin Leong Lau, Jian Li, and Jia Liu. "Technical Analysis of Sand Production for Offshore Natural Gas Hydrate Trials in South China Sea." In SPE Russian Petroleum Technology Conference. SPE, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/206411-ms.
Full textKhlyshcheva, Elena, Maria Kusmidinova, Valentina Tikhonova, and Ilya Mametjev. "The formation of a common cultural space as a problem of cultural security of the Caspian Sea countries." In "The Caspian in the Digital Age" within the framework of the International Scientific Forum "Caspian 2021: Ways of Sustainable Development". Dela Press Publishing House, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.56199/dpcsebm.zxsm3310.
Full textUsmanov, Rafik, Vyacheslav Golovin, Maia Urazgalieva, and Vladislav Kondratiev. "Factors and prospects for the development of geostrategic territories in contemporary geopolitical processes of the Greater Caspian Region (the case of Astrakhan region)." In "The Caspian in the Digital Age" within the framework of the International Scientific Forum "Caspian 2021: Ways of Sustainable Development". Dela Press Publishing House, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.56199/dpcsebm.mqpz1252.
Full text