Journal articles on the topic 'Technological innovation'
To see the other types of publications on this topic, follow the link: Technological innovation.
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the top 50 journal articles for your research on the topic 'Technological innovation.'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Browse journal articles on a wide variety of disciplines and organise your bibliography correctly.
1
TORUGSA, NUTTANEEYA (ANN), and WAYNE O’DONOHUE. "MANAGING KNOWLEDGE-RELATED BARRIERS TO TECHNOLOGICAL INNOVATION THROUGH EXPLOITATIVE AND EXPLORATIVE ORGANISATIONAL STRATEGIES." International Journal of Innovation Management 23, no. 04 (May 2019): 1950035. http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/s136391961950035x.
Abstract:
This study uses data from a sample of 31,948 European innovating firms to examine the impact that knowledge-related barriers to technological innovation have on the link between the level of such innovation and firm performance, and, to investigate the role of “exploitative” and “explorative” organisational strategies in moderating such impact. Exploitative strategies are measured by the level of organisational innovations, and exploratory strategies are measured by the level of methods for fostering workplace creativity. Using moderated hierarchical regression, the results reveal a negative effect of the interaction between technological innovation and related knowledge constraints on firm performance. They also reveal that the negative interaction effect becomes positive at high levels of organisational innovations and creativity-fostering methods. The study findings thus indicate the need for managers of technologically innovative firms to implement both exploitative and explorative organisational strategies. Doing so could help minimise the negative effects of knowledge-related barriers to technological innovation, and in turn promote innovation-based competitiveness and business success.
2
Turker, Duygu, and Y. Serkan Ozmen. "How do social entrepreneurs develop technological innovation?" Social Enterprise Journal 17, no. 1 (January 15, 2021): 63–93. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/sej-05-2020-0034.
Abstract:
Purpose The present study attempts to analyze how social entrepreneurs (SEs) develop technological innovation in the face of diverse institutional logics, which are embedded in the National Systems of Innovation (NSI). Design/methodology/approach Based on the content analysis of Ashoka Fellows, the study compares SEs in developed and developing countries, which represent strong versus weak NSIs. Findings SEs selectively couple the elements of diverse institutional logics to ensure the resource inflow and legitimacy of their operations. However, SEs particularly at weak NSIs are also decoupling their profit and non-for-profit branches to address conflict among diverse logics. Moreover, the study finds that 12 out of 20 entrepreneurs who identify themselves as technologically innovative did not develop any new technological innovation. Practical implications The study shows that being technologically innovative depends on the acquisition of resources and the management of legitimacy challenges, SEs can diversify their innovations by creating more incremental, architectural and modular innovations to address competing demands among logics. Social implications The study reveals that SEs in weak NSIs interact with multiple institutional logics more frequently than their counterparts in strong NSIs. Although this context leads them to diversify their technological innovation, there is a need for improving the NSIs of SEs in developing countries to facilitate the continuity of resource inflow and ensure the legitimacy of their operations. Originality/value Integrating two complementary theoretical lenses, the study contributes to the literature by exploring the impact of the interaction between logics nested within a supra system and SEs’ ability to develop technological innovation.
3
Ndzana, Martin, Onomo Cyrille, Gregory Mvogo, and Thierry Bedzeme. "Innovation and small and medium enterprises’ performance in Cameroon." Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development 28, no. 5 (June 15, 2021): 724–43. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/jsbed-06-2020-0188.
Abstract:
PurposeThis article attempts to explain performance through the development of innovations within small and medium enterprises (SMEs). Specifically, the authors analyse the determinants of innovation and assess the role of technological and non-technological innovations in performance.Design/methodology/approachBased on a sample of 508 Cameroonian SMEs, the PSM (propensity score matching) technique was used to reduce the selection bias inherent in this type of analysis.FindingsThe results show that technological innovation does not influence significantly the performance of SMEs, whereas non-technological innovation positively influences it. The combination of these two types of innovation leads to better performance than even accentuated development of only one type.Practical implicationsTo improve the performance of SMEs, it is necessary to adopt a comprehensive innovation policy that combines non-technological and technological innovations. In addition, it is important to intensify informations and communication technologies (ICT) promotion policies that contribute to the adoption of innovations within enterprises.Originality/valueThis paper contributes to the literature by showing the role of technological and non-technological innovations in explaining the performance of SMEs. Moreover, unlike the existing work in sub-Saharan Africa, which is limited to testing the innovation–performance relationship, this study also determines the productivity gain generated by innovative firms compared to non-innovative ones.
4
Opazo-Basáez, Marco, Ferran Vendrell-Herrero, and Oscar F. Bustinza. "Digital service innovation: a paradigm shift in technological innovation." Journal of Service Management 33, no. 1 (November 18, 2021): 97–120. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/josm-11-2020-0427.
Abstract:
PurposeExisting innovation frameworks suggest that manufacturing firms have traditionally developed a complementary model of technological innovations comprising process and product innovations (e.g. Oslo Manual). This article presents digital service innovation as a novel form of technological innovation that is capable of enhancing the performance of firms in certain manufacturing industries.Design/methodology/approachDrawing on technological innovation and digital servitization fields of research, this study argues that digital service innovation, in manufacturing contexts, complements traditional sources of technological innovation, so increasing the profit margins of firms. This effect is significant in industries characterized by business-to-business contexts, high presence of link channels and long product life spans (e.g. manufacturing and computer-based industries). Predictions are tested on a unique sample of 423 Spanish manufacturing firms using parametric (t-test) and nonparametric (fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis, fsQCA) approaches.FindingsThe results of this analysis show that a necessary condition so that manufacturing firms can increase profits is the deployment of simultaneous process and product innovations. It also reveals that optimal configuration requires that digital service innovation be undertaken, particularly in machinery and computer-based manufacturing industries. Hence, all three sources of technological innovation are brought together in order to reach the highest levels of company performance. The evidence suggests that technological innovation and digital servitization are closely interrelated in highly innovative manufacturing contexts.Originality/valueThis study's originality and value reside in the fact that it reveals the existence of firms incorporating digital service innovation – a new, technological innovation dimension that challenges existing innovation frameworks – to complement traditional technological innovation sources, namely process and product innovation. Moreover, the study conceptualizes and empirically tests the value-adding role of digital services in firms' technological innovation portfolio.
5
Pigola, Angélica, Priscila Rezende da Costa, Marcos Rogério Mazieri, and Isabel Cristina Scafuto. "Collaborative innovation: a technological perspective." International Journal of Innovation 10, no. 2 (June 22, 2022): 204–11. http://dx.doi.org/10.5585/iji.v10i2.22256.
Abstract:
Collaborative innovation become one of the most strategy decision across firms and a well-defined phenomenon that became popular among practitioners and researchers (A. S. Cui O’Connor, 2012; Liu et al., 2017). Many theories were considered to explain collaboration phenomena such as resources-based view, organization theory, strategy, information processing theory, the economic theory of complementarities among others (Barney, 1991; Cassiman Veugelers, 2006; Daft Lengel, 1986; Milgrom Roberts, 1995; Tushman Nadler, 1978). However, technology advances provide new variations in collaboration to innovativeness. For example, collaborative activities with suppliers and customers (Karhade Dong, 2021), community source projects (Liu et al., 2017) or collaboration with distant partners (T. Cui et al., 2020), corporate engagement with startups (Shankar Shepherd, 2019), innovation networks (Aarikka-Stenroos et al., 2017), and innovation ecosystems (Granstrand Holgersson, 2020).Collaborative innovation takes over the existence of an inter-organizational activities executed by people that together perform with high level of interdependence something innovative (T. Cui et al., 2020; Davis Eisenhardt, 2011). Some authors (Adner Kapoor, 2010; T. Cui et al., 2020; Rico et al., 2008) highlight that this interdependence is characterized along two dimensions: technological and behavioral. Technological interdependence is linked to knowledge and the exchange of resources for research and development, and behavioral interdependence is associated with the field of communication, social interaction between collaborative actors and the coordination of these relationships to innovate.Other perspectives in the literature explain and theorize about collaborative innovation as knowledge-sharing trajectories (Majchrzak Malhotra, 2016; Trkman Desouza, 2012), or multi-actor collaboration (Torfing, 2019), or building collaborative capabilities (Swink, 2006) among other approaches. In this editorial, we bring some thoughts and idea about collaborative innovation under a technological perspective to incentive researchers to go beyond in innovative technologies research embedded in collaboration.Collaboration efforts also became a common way of firms to enhance innovations and its technological development with clear determinants about their beneficial effects, and therefore, the literature is well stablished in this subject (Pereira et al., 2018). However, collaboration only succeeds when technological resources and capabilities are combined, and parties define jointly how to enhance and use them accordingly (Snow, 2015).Collaborative innovation as a new technological paradigm refers to a network innovation model supported by interactions of multiple parties such as enterprises, universities and research institutions as core elements and government, financial institutions, nonprofit organizations, intermediaries as auxiliary elements (W. Zhang et al., 2021). Notwithstanding, collaboration networks operating in different organizational levels are present in various patterns and characteristics of evolution, they require different actors and capabilities in the network composition to become a remarkable asset in developing technologies to be patented afterwards in some cases (Gomes et al., 2017).In facing of risks of failures during innovative trajectories, firms invest in collaborative initiatives as an attempt to mitigate cost impacts, share responsibilities and greater technical performance in the process of technology lifecycle development. Thus, technological alliances are useful means to attend these goals (Kim Song, 2007). Technological alliances are critical to enable digital transformation and innovation. Briefly, Zhang et al. (2021) highlight technological alliance as a voluntary interfirm cooperation involving codeveloping technologies through sharing and exchanging of these technologies to meet business needs (W. Zhang et al., 2021).The collaborations in various technological domains help to bring heterogenous knowledge, complementary resources, and capabilities for a better innovation performance (Swink, 2006; W. Zhang et al., 2021). Under the perspective that innovation is essentially knowledge creation (Nonaka, 1994), collaborative innovation through a technological perspective may be configured by different activities, processes, or routines of generation, sharing, integration, and utilization of knowledge produced during the innovation process lifecycle (Nonaka, 1994; W. Zhang et al., 2021). Further, this configuration of activities, processes, or routines support the development of evolutionary technological capabilities (Sampson, 2007).In the field of technological innovations, the evolution now is more collaborative in nature (J. Zhang et al., 2019). Collaboration is a trend for technological prosperity. Analyzing collaborative innovation in the literature is a great challenge even if the focus on technologies is defined because various aspects and applications of collaboration to innovate invade the academic literature in many forms. For instance, Zhou and Ren (2021) analyzed low-carbon technology collaborative innovation in industrial cluster; Shen et al. (2021) studied collaborative innovation in supply chain systems; Wan et al. (2022) highlight that blockchain application intensify collaborative innovation through distributed computing, cryptography and game theory; Li and Zhou (2022) researched on the mechanism of Government–Industry–University–Institute collaborative innovation in green technology; and Fan et al. (2022) pointed out that collaborative innovation also may act as a driver to mobilize and coordinate scientific and technological resources within a city, further promoting innovative development among cities.On the other hand, technological collaborative innovations has its own dark side for firms: it has been costly, it demands money, efforts, and time (Torugsa Arundel, 2016; Wegrich, 2019), and, further, it provokes operational adjustments, technological reconfiguration, and legal barriers to overcome to be effective for innovation (McGuire Agranoff, 2011; Vivona et al., 2022). To address this side of collaborative innovation, Vivona et al. (2022) developed the cost theory to systematize all insights from the literature in four main factors: governance, compactness, reliability, and institutionalization to shed light on a broader range of costs for innovation incurred by collaborative arrangements. Governance refers to relationships in hierarchical level and the number of collaborators involved, reliability refers to relationships’ quality; compactness is about the degree of formality in relationships that connect collaborators; and institutionalization that measure what the extent the relationships in practice have been pre-established. This cost perspective may be explored empirically.The decentralization of technological collaborative innovation, its nonlinear, globalized, and networked form transformed its process to more collaborative approaches among entities (Fan et al., 2020). Lopes and Farias (2022) showed that technology tools support the establishment of relationships of trust promoted by leaders committed to well-established goals, being a characteristic of governance that has a positive influence on collaborative innovation processes. Hwang (2020) mentioned that several countries have implemented policies to facilitate technological convergence by supporting collaborative innovations. The author also mentions that collaborative innovation is a crucial strategy to facilitate technological convergence. In sum, firms have been increased collaboration in technological activities and collaboration works as an enabling to learn about turbulent technological change and uncertainties to enhance the ability to deal with innovations (Dodgson, 1993).Technological collaborative innovation is considered essential to promote the flow of resources, knowledge, and technology among entities, considering that innovation is no longer a closed and isolated system. The main premise is technologies do not exist in isolation. Only by exchanging materials, energy, and information with the environment the innovation system be renewed and developed. Therefore, the integrator condition of technological collaborative innovation is also conducive to a more comprehensive disclosure of the collaborative mode and overall performance of technological innovation activities (Fan et al., 2020).Technological collaborative innovation is not a merely coordination of an orderly arrangements of efforts to pursue a common technological purpose (Mooney, 1953), or a merely cooperation to join agreed-on goals into a share comprehension about design systems or reconfigure technological resources (Gulati et al., 2012). It merges cooperation (commitment towards same end) with coordination (complexity to work together effectively) (Vivona et al., 2022). This view may be much more explored by the researchers to enhance the practical aspects of this perspective.In general, collaboration itself does not survive in the face of inevitable behavioral problems which requires an establishment of trust characterized by receptive organizational cultures, community of interest, and continually supplement knowledge for the purpose of collaboration in highly successful technological innovations (Dodgson, 1993). Thus, this can be a new chapter for technological collaborative innovations.
6
Yaoming, Xie, and E. F. Gulyaeva. "Analysis of thte significance of technological innovations in business management." Entrepreneur’s Guide 14, no. 1 (February 21, 2021): 133–41. http://dx.doi.org/10.24182/2073-9885-2021-14-1-133-141.
Abstract:
This article gives the definition and the essence of the technological innovations within the framework of enterprise level of business management. The innovative business development indicators in terms of technological innovation are presented. Interfering reasons of innovative business development are highlighted. Foreign experience of applying the technological innovations within the business management is analyzed. Innovation development factors are presented in results
7
Weng, Calvin S. "Innovation Intermediaries in Technological Alliances." International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management 14, no. 02 (March 22, 2017): 1740013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/s0219877017400132.
Abstract:
Technological alliances play an important role in generating innovations but face the challenge of effective matchmaking when finding suitable partners in “open innovation” among networks of innovating firms. Intermediaries refer to those external mechanisms/institutions that can appropriately support companies in their innovation-related activities. They are frequently used to build a bridge between different competency constraints among companies. The purpose of this paper was to try to understand the role of a firm’s alliances within the context of open innovation. What do innovation intermediaries of collaborative partners contribute? Using the “Strategic Alliance Database” established by the National Science Council (NSC) in Taiwan as a basis, this study empirically explored the brokerage roles in the alliance that intermediaries take on to facilitate technological innovation and an innovation process. By using the technique of two-mode network analysis for social network analysis, this research focused on the question of how a technological alliance creates a platform for firms to execute matchmaking for new and/or relevant partners. The results presented here reveal that brokerage roles can be used to develop collaborations. The strategic position of the intermediary can activate different resources from the ones embedded in an alliance network.
8
Mothe, Caroline, and Thuc Uyen Nguyen Thi. "The link between non‐technological innovations and technological innovation." European Journal of Innovation Management 13, no. 3 (August 3, 2010): 313–32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/14601061011060148.
9
Kukartsev, Vladislav, Alena Stupina, Vadim Tynchenko, Ilia Panfilov, and Larisa Korpacheva. "Air and space vehicle production: indicators of innovative activity." Economic Annals-ХХI 187, no. 1-2 (February 28, 2021): 114–20. http://dx.doi.org/10.21003/ea.v187-11.
Abstract:
We analyze the problems of increasing the innovative activity of air and space vehicle manufacturing enterprises in Russia by the year 2021 and consider indicators reflecting the innovative activity of organizations, such as the implementation of innovations, the proportion of organizations engaged in technological innovation, cost of technological innovation by the source of funds, the dynamics of the innovative production output. Besides, correlation analysis of the relationship between the main indicators of innovation activity and the intensity of expenditures on technological innovations has been performed to identify dependencies describing air and space vehicle production’s distinctive features.
10
Bocharova, Yu G. "State and Peculiarities of Innovation Infrastructure Development in Ukraine." Statistics of Ukraine 81, no. 2 (October 18, 2018): 43–50. http://dx.doi.org/10.31767/su.2(81)2018.02.06.
Abstract:
The state and peculiarities of the development of the innovation infrastructure of Ukraine were analyzed in the article. It was found that: 1. At the present stage of development of the country, it is difficult to determine the real state and peculiarities of the development of innovation infrastructure, as different institutions provide different, and sometimes diametrically opposed, information on the number of elements of the innovation infrastructure that is created and functioning in Ukraine. 2. Innovation infrastructure of Ukraine is not only fragmentary, but it also shows a steady negative trend of development - the number of elements of innovation infrastructure is constantly decreasing. 3. Innovative funds and companies are the most developed type of innovation infrastructure in Ukraine. 4. The most innovatively active are large (on average 29.2% of surveyed large enterprises) and medium-sized enterprises. 5. The Most Ukrainian innovative enterprises implemented non-technological innovations (implemented marketing and organizational innovations). 6. The vast majority of Ukrainian innovative enterprises with technological innovations engaged in the purchase of machinery, equipment, software and facilities. 7. Only 25% of innovative enterprises with technological innovations co-operated with other enterprises and organizations. 8. Innovative enterprises with technological innovations often collaborated with suppliers of equipment, materials, components or software. 9. Innovative enterprises of Ukraine mostly cooperated with Ukrainian enterprises (on average, 24% of enterprises with technological innovations), on average European enterprises and organizations accounted for 5.7%, China and India – 1.3%, the USA – 1.2%. 10. Innovative activity of enterprises of Ukraine is characterized by clear regional and branch specifics. 11. The vast majority of innovative enterprises carry out their activities in the processing industry, information and telecommunications. 12. The regions-leaders in terms of the share of innovative enterprises in the total number of enterprises are Rivne, Kharkiv and Ivano-Frankivsk region.
11
Hwang, Bang-Ning, and Mu-Yen Hsu. "The impact of technological innovation upon servitization." Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management 30, no. 7 (November 4, 2019): 1097–114. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/jmtm-08-2018-0242.
Abstract:
Purpose For most manufacturing firms, technological innovations are usually the key strategies to gain their competitive advantages. However, competing strategically through service provision is becoming an important strategy for most industries. A growing demand for packaged product and service delivery is blurring the traditional boundaries between manufacturing and service firms. This trend is called “servitization.” Prior research had different perspectives on the relationship between technological innovations and servitization. Some argued that as servitization exerts the innovative convergence of products and services, the possession of appropriate readiness and absorption capacity through technological innovations for a manufacturing firm is critical to the success of servitization. In contrast, some argued that the knowledge gained from developing technological innovations cannot be applied to the creation of services due to the fundamental difference between technology and service. These contradicting arguments motivated the authors to study the relationship between technological innovations and servitization a step further. The paper aims to discuss these issues. Design/methodology/approach To address the research gap, the authors conducted an empirical study based on the large-scale samples from the second Taiwan Community Innovation Survey (Taiwan CIS). A multivariate logistic regression model was applied in the research. Findings The authors found that different types of technological innovations, namely product innovation and process innovation, have different impacts on servitization. The innovativeness level of the technological innovation moderates the relationship between technological innovation and servitization. Based on the above findings, this research specifically explains the causes of the contradictory results of the prior research. Originality/value The values of this research are twofold. Its academic contribution rests on bridging the literature of innovation and servitization, and on providing a model to clarify the relationships among technological innovation type, level of innovativeness and servitization. Its practical contribution lies in its establishment of a guideline that illuminates manufacturing firms reinforcing service delivery through their existing technological innovation trajectory.
12
RADICIC, DRAGANA, DAVID DOUGLAS, GEOFF PUGH, and IAN JACKSON. "COOPERATION FOR INNOVATION AND ITS IMPACT ON TECHNOLOGICAL AND NON-TECHNOLOGICAL INNOVATIONS: EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE FOR EUROPEAN SMES IN TRADITIONAL MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES." International Journal of Innovation Management 23, no. 05 (May 29, 2019): 1950046. http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/s1363919619500464.
Abstract:
Drawing on a sample of small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) in traditional manufacturing industries from seven EU regions, this study investigates how cooperation with external organisations affects technological (product and process) innovations and non-technological (organisational and marketing) innovations as well as the commercial success of product and process innovations (i.e., innovative sales). Our empirical strategy takes into account that all four types of innovation are potentially complementary. Empirical results suggest that cooperation increases firms’ innovativeness and yields substantial commercial benefits. In particular, increasing the number of cooperation partnerships has a positive impact on all measures of innovation performance. We conclude that a portfolio approach to cooperation enhances innovation performance and that innovation support programs should be demand-led.
13
Bedau, Mark A., Nicholas Gigliotti, Tobias Janssen, Alec Kosik, Ananthan Nambiar, and Norman Packard. "Open-Ended Technological Innovation." Artificial Life 25, no. 1 (April 2019): 33–49. http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/artl_a_00279.
Abstract:
We detect ongoing innovation in empirical data about human technological innovations. Ongoing technological innovation is a form of open-ended evolution, but it occurs in a nonbiological, cultural population that consists of actual technological innovations that exist in the real world. The change over time of this population of innovations seems to be quite open-ended. We take patented inventions as a proxy for technological innovations and mine public patent records for evidence of the ongoing emergence of technological innovations, and we compare two ways to detect it. One way detects the first instances of predefined patent pigeonholes, specifically the technology classes listed in the United States Patent Classification (USPC). The second way embeds patents in a high-dimensional semantic space and detects the emergence of new patent clusters. After analyzing hundreds of years of patent records, both methods detect the emergence of new kinds of technologies, but clusters are much better at detecting innovations that are unanticipated and undetected by USPC pigeonholes. Our clustering methods generalize to detect unanticipated innovations in other evolving populations that generate ongoing streams of digital data.
14
Tumelero, Cleonir, Roberto Sbragia, and Felipe Mendes Borini. "The Combinative Effect of Organizational and Technological Eco-innovations in R&D-intensive Companies." Environmental Management and Sustainable Development 9, no. 4 (November 24, 2020): 60. http://dx.doi.org/10.5296/emsd.v9i4.17786.
Abstract:
This study aims to investigate the influence of organizational and process eco-innovations on the introduction of product eco-innovations in R&D-intensive companies. We covered theory gaps by empirically demonstrating to what extent non-technological and technological eco-innovations are related. We used the Survey method to investigate a sample of Brazilian manufacturers from the electrical and electronics sectors, and we processed the data through Structural Equation Modeling (SEM). The findings of this study evidenced that non-technological eco-innovations are able to influence technological eco-innovations, both process and product, suggesting that the organizational eco-innovation strategy leads to sustainable technological path dependence in R&D-intensive companies. Additionally, findings demonstrated that the association between organizational and product eco-innovation is stronger whether mediated by process eco-innovation, so the result confirms an evolutionary perspective regarding the differentiated types of eco-innovation. We conclude that by investing in eco-innovative R&D projects, new environmental systems, teams' formation, information flow, and trends monitoring, the company creates a path dependence for technological eco-innovation of process and products.
15
Aksinin, Vladimir I., and Leonid A. Saraev. "Economic and mathematical models of transformation manufacturing enterprise, taking into account the dynamics of its innovative potential." Vestnik of Samara University. Economics and Management 14, no. 1 (May 16, 2023): 157–71. http://dx.doi.org/10.18287/2542-0461-2023-14-1-157-171.
Abstract:
In the published article, economic and mathematical models of an enterprise are proposed, taking into account the influence of its innovative potential on the dynamics of growth in output and production factors. Models are a system of differential equations regarding the resources of the enterprise and the function of its innovative potential. Three options for the formation of the innovative potential of an enterprise from the product, process technological innovations of mixed technological innovations introduced into production are considered. In the first case, innovative potential is formed from product technological innovations that bring new or improved products to the market. In the second case, the innovative potential is formed on the basis of providing a new or significantly improved way of producing products. In the third case, the innovative potential is the result of a simultaneous combination of product and process technological innovations. Scenarios for the development of an enterprise are constructed that correspond to the absence of innovation potential, product innovation potential, process innovation potential, mixed innovation potential and the case of full implementation of innovation potential. A variant of scenarios for the development of an enterprise is presented, in which the innovative potential is introduced from the very beginning, and a variant of scenarios for the development of an enterprise, in which the innovative potential is introduced from a certain point in time.
16
Su, Wan, Xiaobo Xu, Yangchun Li, Francisco J. Martínez-López, and Ling Li. "Technological Innovation." Journal of Global Information Management 26, no. 2 (April 2018): 193–203. http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/jgim.2018040109.
Abstract:
The Mobile Internet Information Technology (MIIT) has been widely accepted as one of the most promising technologies in the next decades, having various applications and different value positions. However, few published studies explore and examine the effects of MIIT on community management. Based on the Dramaturgical Theory, this article uses a case study method to get an insightful understanding of MIIT. This article found that the MIIT was used by grid organizations to realize technological innovation and change organizational routines and structures, but eventually it was shaped by them, so this new technology was only able to embed itself into the public service model as a secondary or complementary role.
17
Feller, Irwin, Denis Gray, Trudy Solomon, William Hetzner, Jurgen Schmandt, Robert Wilson, Kenneth Flamm, and Peter Hall. "Technological Innovation." Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 8, no. 1 (1989): 155. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3324440.
18
Croome, Derek. "Technological innovation." Batiment International, Building Research and Practice 18, no. 3 (May 1990): 174–82. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01823329008727036.
19
Charles, David. "TECHNOLOGICAL INNOVATION." Australian Journal of Public Administration 49, no. 3 (September 1990): 332–42. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8500.1990.tb01976.x.
20
Kim, Yoomi. "Technological Innovation, the Kyoto Protocol, and Open Innovation." Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity 7, no. 3 (September 8, 2021): 198. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/joitmc7030198.
Abstract:
This study investigates the role of technological innovation in increasing the effectiveness of the Kyoto Protocol in terms of greenhouse gas (GHG) mitigation. Panel data showing the number of patents for climate change mitigation technology as a measure of innovation are obtained from 54 countries for the period 1990–2015 to verify whether technological innovation is effective in reducing GHG emissions and whether it has a significant synergetic relationship with the Kyoto Protocol. The historical trends in the number of patents for climate change mitigation technology reveal a relationship between the Kyoto Protocol and technological innovation and show differences between specific types of mitigation technology. Based on these innovation data, this study conducts two-stage least squares analysis that considers the time-lag effect. The empirical results confirm that mitigation innovations for buildings and the production or processing of goods have a strong positive association with GHG emission reduction. The findings also support the long-term synergetic effect between innovation and participation in the Kyoto Protocol in terms of GHG mitigation. This study contributes to international climate change governance by providing empirical evidence for technological innovation’s role in strengthening the effectiveness of international regimes and implications for promoting open innovation.
21
Wadho, Waqar, and Azam Chaudhry. "Innovation in the Textiles Sector: A Firm-Level Analysis of Technological and Nontechnological Innovation." LAHORE JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS 21, Special Edition (September 1, 2016): 129–66. http://dx.doi.org/10.35536/lje.2016.v21.isp.a6.
Abstract:
In a knowledge-based economy, it has become increasingly important to better understand critical aspects of the innovation process such as innovation activities beyond R&D, the interaction among different actors in the market and the relevant knowledge flows. Using a sample of 431 textiles and apparel manufacturers, this paper explores the dynamics of firms’ innovation activities by analyzing their innovation behavior, the extent and types of innovation, the resources devoted to innovation, sources of knowledge spillovers, the factors hampering technological innovation and the returns to innovation for three years, 2013–15. Our results show that 56 percent of the surveyed firms introduced technological and/or nontechnological innovations, while 38 percent introduced new products, these innovations were generally incremental as the majority of innovations were new only to the firm. Furthermore, the innovation rate increases with firm size; large firms have an innovation rate of 83 percent, followed by medium firms (68 percent) and small firms (39 percent). Technologically innovative firms spent, on average, 10 percent of their turnover on innovation expenditure in 2015. Acquisition of machinery and equipment is the main innovation activity, accounting for 56 percent of innovation expenditures. Large firms consider foreign market sources (clients and suppliers) and small firms consider local market sources their key source of information and cooperation. 63 percent of technological innovators cite improving the quality of goods as their most important objective. Lack of available funds within the enterprise is the single most important cost factor hampering innovation, followed by the high cost of innovation. Our results show that 67 percent of the turnover among product innovators in 2015 resulted from product innovations that were either new to the market or new to the firm.
22
Moon, Chang-Ho. "The Impact of Technological Innovation Orientation and Technological Innovation Capabilities on Technological Innovation Performance." Korean Corporation Management Review 23, no. 6 (December 31, 2016): 47–72. http://dx.doi.org/10.21052/kcmr.2016.23.6.03.
23
Woodward, Philip. "Technological Innovation and Natural Law." Philosophia Reformata 85, no. 2 (November 4, 2020): 138–56. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/23528230-8502a001.
Abstract:
Abstract I discuss three tiers of technological innovation: mild innovation, or the acceleration by technology of a human activity aimed at a good; moderate innovation, or the obviation by technology of an activity aimed at a good; and radical innovation, or the altering by technology of the human condition so as to change what counts as a good. I argue that it is impossible to morally assess proposed innovations within any of these three tiers unless we rehabilitate a natural-law ethical framework. And I offer some moral starting points within such a framework, in connection with innovations of each of the three types.
24
Ribeiro, Eduardo. "Technological Laboratory for Pedagogical Innovation and Learning - (LaTIPA)." Estrabão 1 (June 12, 2020): 1–7. http://dx.doi.org/10.53455/re.v1i.2.
Abstract:
This article addresses the theoretical conceptions and purposes of creating the Technological Laboratory of Pedagogical Innovation and Learning (LaTIPA). From a theoretical review of technological innovation concepts in learning processes, the laboratory was systematized to create pedagogical innovations through innovative actions and projects involving applied technology. In this work, we present the theoretical conceptions that substantiate this proposal. The results of this project are expected to come to consolidate the exposed motivations.
25
Londarenko, Daria. "INNOVATIVE AND TECHNOLOGICAL POTENTIAL AS A NECESSARY CONDITION FOR THE SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT OF THE REGION." Three Seas Economic Journal 1, no. 3 (December 18, 2020): 59–65. http://dx.doi.org/10.30525/2661-5150/2020-3-10.
Abstract:
The object of the study is regional economic systems that implement innovative technological processes. The subject of the study is the economic, organizational, and managerial relations that develop in the process of formation and use of innovative and technological potential at the regional level. The purpose of the article is to study the innovative potential of the regions, substantiate the theoretical provisions and develop methodological recommendations for the development of effective ways and forms of its mobilization. Methods. The theoretical and methodological basis of the study is the conceptual provisions and scientific developments of domestic and foreign scientists on the formation and use of elements of innovative and technological potential at various levels of management, published in monographs, periodicals and materials of scientific and practical conferences on the topic of research. The study is based on a general scientific methodology that provides for the use of a systematic approach. Methods of observation, comparison, categorical, structural-functional, situational, economic mathematical methods, and the method of hierarchy analysis are used to solve the tasks. Results. The article describes the innovative and technological potential of the region as an economic and managerial category. The typology of innovation as a complex and diversified concept containing many interacting components is studied. The following essential characteristics of the innovation and technological potential of the region are highlighted. Firstly, the innovative and technological potential of the region is determined by the opportunities available to it for change. The innovation potential creates conditions sufficient to ensure the progressive development of the regional socio-economic system through the creation of innovations and their purposeful transformation into innovations. Secondly, the innovative and technological potential of the region is characterized by the presence of specific ones, both involved and not involved in production, but prepared for use in it. Third, the innovative and technological potential of the region is determined by the willingness to use the existing innovative opportunities in order to translate innovations into innovations. The structure of the innovation and technological potential of the region is studied. It is determined that of all the components of the innovation potential of the region, the most important is the labor (human) potential. It is characterized, firstly, by the level of qualification, intelligence, and creativity of the population living and functioning in the territory. It is the population, on the one hand, that is able to produce innovations, and on the other hand, to introduce and distribute them, thereby determining the opportunities and directions of innovative development. It is highlighting innovative and technological potential of the region following components, including the capacity of: organization and management technology; research and development; marketing; technology and production; personnel; potential financial base; knowledge base; natural resource. Practical value. This classification of the components of innovation and technological potential is of great practical importance. It focuses the attention of researchers and users on the simple fact that the key element of the innovation potential of the region is the subjects of innovation activity operating on its territory. In particular, among all subjects of management, both employed and not employed population in the market sector of the economy should be singled out.
26
Nathan, G. "Innovation process and ethics in technology: an approach to ethical (responsible) innovation governance." Journal on Chain and Network Science 15, no. 2 (December 7, 2015): 119–34. http://dx.doi.org/10.3920/jcns2014.x018.
Abstract:
In general, innovation governance models, which deal with organizational structure, innovation process, strategy and leadership, are becoming increasingly important for innovative companies for effective innovation management. Moreover, responsible innovation (RI) as a topic among academic scholars and policy makers is gaining importance, in order to address some of the ethical concerns and dilemmas as issues of governance in general and with special reference to technological innovations. This article attempts to show that technological innovation processes require a circular RI process instead of a linear one with embedded ethical decision-making framework for ethical innovation governance.
27
Meshcheryakova, Tatiana. "Evaluation of innovation activity science-intensive and high-tech of enterprises." MATEC Web of Conferences 170 (2018): 01048. http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201817001048.
Abstract:
The innovative development of individual enterprises and industries determines the competitiveness of the regional and national economies through modern business technologies for sustainable urban development. The article presents the analysis of categories "science intensive", "high technology", "innovative". The analysis of official data of the Federal Statistical Agency on key indicators of the effectiveness of innovation activities of enterprises is given and their aggregated estimate is given. The dynamics of such indicators as: innovative activity of organizations (specific weight of organizations that carried out technological, organizational, marketing innovations in the reporting year) was revealed; the share of innovative goods, works, services in the total volume of goods shipped, works performed, services; costs for technological innovation; specific weight of expenses for technological innovations in the total volume of shipped goods, works performed, services, etc. In the course of the research, recommendations were developed to increase the efficiency of innovation activities of enterprises based on assessing innovation activity and identifying innovative capacity, as well as applying the necessary economic and mathematical tools for the assessment and modelling of innovative projects and enterprise programs.
28
Wanaswa, Perpetua S., Zachary B. Awino, Martin Ogutu, and Joseph Owino. "Technological Innovation and Competitive Advantage: Empirical Evidence from Large Telecommunication Firms." International Journal of Business and Management 16, no. 10 (August 5, 2021): 21. http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/ijbm.v16n10p21.
Abstract:
Empirical research demonstrating the influence of technological innovation on competitive advantage has produced inconclusive results. This paper, therefore, aims to investigate the association amidst technological innovations and competitive advantage. Significant transformations have been evident in Kenya’s telecommunication industry for the last two decades, which has resulted in intense competition, and technological innovation has become the new face of competition among firms. The study applied the positivism philosophy and adopted the descriptive cross-sectional survey design. The target population comprised all 83 large licensed telecommunications service providers where census method was used. Both descriptive and inferential statistics were utilized in the analysis of data. Descriptive statistics comprised of frequencies, percentages, means, and standard deviations while inferential statistics used linear regression analysis which was employed in testing the hypothesis. Findings reveal a significant and positive influence of technological innovation on competitive advantage. Technological innovation explained the variations in competitive advantage. It is deduced from the findings that more technologically innovative telecommunication firms are likely to produce better products and services and consequently able to acquire more customers earning competitive advantage compared to less innovative telecommunication firms. The study presented notable implications on the policy framework, the strategic management practice, and theory implications in the telecommunication industry and beyond. At policy level, the Government of Kenya would benefit from the study by ensuring that policy makers and regulatory authorities in the telecommunication sector formulate policies that would promote technological innovation for enhancing competitive advantage. Managerial practitioners may consider institutionalizing innovation by creating the requisite direction and controls that enable the emergence of innovation and value creation for sustainable competitive advantage. The study findings’ implications further extended, supported, and added value on the theory adopted by the study.
29
Núñez Jover, Jorge, and José Antonio López Cerezo. "Technological Innovation as Social Innovation." Science, Technology, & Human Values 33, no. 6 (February 13, 2008): 707–29. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0162243907306707.
30
Plinta, Dariusz, and Katarzyna Radwan. "Implementation of Technological Innovation in a Manufacturing Company." Applied Sciences 13, no. 10 (May 15, 2023): 6068. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/app13106068.
Abstract:
The dynamics of change in the market force organizations to be ready to take up challenges. The innovation of enterprises is a determinant of their development. Implementation of technological innovation involves a large number of important strategic decisions. This publication discusses the issue of implementing technological innovation in a manufacturing enterprise. The subject of the manuscript includes the creation of a comprehensive methodology of proceedings. This, in turn, includes issues that determine the effectiveness of the management process of an innovative project in a small-batch production enterprise, whose specificity requires the proposal of a methodology for creating a concept of an innovative product under the conditions of limited project resources. The presented approach provides support for the creation of an innovation concept and its proper management. The proposed methodology allows for the evaluation and selection of optimal solution variants and the development of the technical preparation of new production in terms of construction, technology, and organization. The implementation of improvements presented in the article results in an increase in the company’s ability to successfully implement technological innovations, whose implementation is an essential step to increase the value and growth of the company.
31
BUDAGOV, A. S., and R. V. MOLCHANOVA. "EFFECTIVE USE OF SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNOLOGICAL POTENTIAL IN THE NATIONAL INNOVATION SYSTEM." EKONOMIKA I UPRAVLENIE: PROBLEMY, RESHENIYA 1, no. 9 (2021): 115–20. http://dx.doi.org/10.36871/ek.up.p.r.2021.09.01.017.
Abstract:
The article deals with the issues of effective use of scientific and technological potential in the national innovation system. The analysis of indicators of innovative activity of domestic enterprises for the period under study is presented. The problems of introducing technological innovations at domestic enterprises and the peculiarities of using infrastructural, production-technological, personnel and financial capabilities of companies are identified. The role of the state in the development and implementation of programs for innovative development of companies, the development of the domestic market for innovations and the creation of innovative scientific and technological centers is noted. The available statistical data indicate an increase in the number of organizations implementing technological innovations through the development of their innovative potential, which corresponds to the national goals and strategic objectives of the development of the Russian Federation for the long term.
32
Ananich, Marina I. "MODERN CHALLENGES AND PROBLEMS OF SCIENTIFIC-TECHNOLOGICAL AND INNOVATIVE DEVELOPMENT." Interexpo GEO-Siberia 8, no. 2 (July 8, 2020): 3–13. http://dx.doi.org/10.33764/2618-981x-2020-8-2-3-13.
Abstract:
The article discusses the priorities and goals of state policy in the scientific and innovation sphere, problems and prospects of promoting innovation in regions on the example of the Novosibirsk region. Failure analysis of innovative projects and companies is carried out. On the example of successful practices, approaches to the development of innovations and their promotion are considered. The influence of the external environment of innovative development on the search for tools and models for project management, including uncertainty and dynamism, is examined.
33
Pekurovsky, Dmitry A. "Innovations and scientific and technological progress in the agroindustrial complex and agriculture." Agrarian science, no. 11-12 (January 20, 2021): 129–33. http://dx.doi.org/10.32634/0869-8155-2020-343-11-122-126.
Abstract:
The article is devoted to modern innovation activity in the agro-industrial complex. The author considers the main types of innovations (scientific and technical, organizational and managerial) and prospects for innovative development during the pandemic. The author comes to the conclusion about the heterogeneous innovation activity in agriculture, as well as the great importance of organizing cooperative associations on an innovative basis.
34
Illiashenko, Sergii, Yuliia Shypulina, and Nataliia Illiashenko. "ANALYTICAL ASSURANCE OF PLANNING OF PRODUCT INNOVATION POLICY OF INDUSTRIAL ENTERPRISES IN THE CONDITIONS OF TECHNOLOGICAL WAYS TRANSFORMATION." HERALD OF KHMELNYTSKYI NATIONAL UNIVERSITY 298, no. 5 Part 1 (October 4, 2021): 199–204. http://dx.doi.org/10.31891/2307-5740-2021-298-5(1)-34.
Abstract:
In periods of technological transformation, innovations and innovative activity are an effective method to ensure the conditions for sustainable survival and development of industrial enterprises. Consequently, perspective strategic directions of innovative development and operative planning need to be defined primary in their product innovation policy as the pricing, communicative and sales policies are derived from it. An approach to the analytical support of planning the product innovation policy of an industrial enterprise in the constantly changing environmental conditions caused by the processes of transformation of technological systems has been developed. In contrast to existing approaches, it provides an analysis of trends in global and industry science and technology, the results of which can be used in production and marketing activities of the enterprise, in particular in forming a portfolio of product innovations as a means of adapting to changes in external micro and macro environment. Factors influencing the innovative development of industrial enterprises in general and their product innovation policy in particular are specified. The scheme of interaction of the specified factors in the course of analytical support of a product innovation policy of the industrial enterprise is outlined. Methodological bases of analytical planning of product innovation policy of industrial enterprises in conditions of technological ways transformation are developed. The application of the developed approach in innovative activities of industrial enterprises will allow purposefully and reasonably plan their product innovation policy as a basis for innovative development in conditions of technological ways transformation and the deployment of the 4th industrial revolution. The obtained scientific results deepen the methodological principles of innovation management of industrial enterprises in terms of analytical support of their product innovation policy.
35
Lee, Sangwon. "When is the atypical design not penalized? Moderating role of product innovativeness and technological sophistication in consumer’s evaluation of new products." American Journal of Business 34, no. 3/4 (November 15, 2019): 169–88. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/ajb-06-2018-0035.
Abstract:
Purpose The purpose of this paper is to examine the individual and joint effects of the two design dimensions, form design and functional design, and moderating role of product innovativeness and technological sophistication in consumer’s evaluation of new products. Employing theoretical underpinnings from categorization theory, this paper investigates two major research questions. First, what type of form is more advantageous for a radically new product or an incrementally new product? Second, is there an individual difference in consumer evaluations to innovative products with various form designs? Design/methodology/approach One pre-test and three between-subject experiments were performed. In Experiments 1 and 2, a two-way between-group ANOVA analysis was performed to examine the effect of form and the degree of technological innovation on attitude toward the product using different product categories (car and camera). In Experiment 3, a three-way between-group ANOVA analysis was performed to explore the impact of form, the degree of technological innovation and consumer technological sophistication on attitude toward the product. Findings The results from the three experiments conducted demonstrate that, first, whereas the form design for incremental innovations must be closer to the incumbent products for favorable evaluations, less typical form is evaluated as good as a more typical form for radical innovations. Second, form design of an innovative product matters more to the technologically more sophisticated consumers (experts). Originality/value This paper extends the previous design literature and fills the gap of under-researched area by demonstrating that individual difference, technological sophistication, moderates the design effect on consumer evaluation of innovation; providing boundary condition of when the atypical form is not penalized in spite of consumer’s perceived learning cost; examining how the form and function interplay in “high-status product”; and demonstrating how to strengthen the reliability and validity by replicating the study. Managerially, this paper demonstrates that innovating firms can influence the perceived value of new products using form and functionality, and marketing managers who launch really new products have strategic freedom of choosing own product design.
36
van der Waal, Esther, Henny van der Windt, and Ellen van Oost. "How Local Energy Initiatives Develop Technological Innovations: Growing an Actor Network." Sustainability 10, no. 12 (December 4, 2018): 4577. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su10124577.
Abstract:
Local energy initiatives are of growing interest to studies of grassroots innovation for sustainability. Some of these initiatives have developed novel technological solutions to fulfil local demand for renewable energy. However, whereas the upscaling and diffusion of grassroots innovations has been extensively discussed in the literature, their emergence has received very little attention so far. We will therefore focus on how energy initiatives can develop technological innovations by bringing together local actors and creating a fit to local circumstances. Grounded in actor network theory (ANT) and structured by concepts from Callon’s sociology of translation, we studied two technologically innovative projects of a Dutch energy initiative. Through document analysis and interviews, we researched how these initiatives developed their innovations by forming networks of social, material, and discursive elements. We found that the outcomes of the innovation processes are very dependent on the networking capacities of the energy initiatives, as well as how well they fit with external circumstances and opportunities. The paper concludes with five lessons for grassroots technological innovation: form links with the local, extensively scrutinize plans, create tangible proof of alignments, position the project as beneficial to as many actors as possible, and adjust the level of ambition to the strength of the actor network.
37
Dadelytė, Elena, and Alma Mačiulytė-Šniukienė. "THE IMPACT OF TECHNOLOGICAL INNOVATIONS ON THE COMPETITIVENESS OF THE TELEMATIC COMPANIES." Mokslas - Lietuvos ateitis 12 (June 30, 2020): 1–11. http://dx.doi.org/10.3846/mla.2020.12433.
Abstract:
Innovation is an important driver of economic progress, benefiting consumers, business and the economy as whole. However, innovation companies face high risks because innovation requires a lot of resources, and it is difficult to predict a payback period in advance. This is common for all types of innovation, but especially to technological innovation. One of the least researched technological innovations is telematics, innovative transport monitoring and control technology solutions. Those are widely applied in logistics, car-sharing platforms and the public transport sector. These innovations help to achieve the goals of the companies that buy and install them, but question what impact they have on the competitiveness of the companies that create these innovations remains a matter of debate. To fill this gap, the purpose of this article is to determine the impact of technological innovation on the competitiveness of telematics companies. In pursuit of this goal, the concepts of technological innovation and competitiveness are revealed. The definition of telematics innovation and its significance for the competitiveness of enterprises was also formed. The empirical part discusses the telematics market, provides the analysis of the main competitiveness indicators of 8 telematics companies and their changes, as well as the analysis of the research and development (R&D) costs and the impact of innovations on competitiveness. Applied research methods: a critical analysis of scientific literature, generalization, systematization of data, computation, and comparison of relative indicator, data dispersion indicator, and dynamics indicator, correlation, and regression analysis. The research reveals that creation and development innovation are related to competitiveness of telematics companies. However, excessive investment into innovation no longer generates positive return.
38
KRUPKA, Myhaylo, Nazar DEMCHYSHAK, and Vasyl HRYB. "CUSTOMER ANALYSIS OF ENTERPRISES INNOVATIVE ACTIVITY IN UKRAINE IN THE CONTEXT OF FINANCIAL REGULATION PRIORITIES FORMING." WORLD OF FINANCE, no. 3(60) (2019): 37–52. http://dx.doi.org/10.35774/sf2019.03.037.
Abstract:
Introduction. The article is devoted to modern problems of analysis of innovative processes in Ukraine in the context of restraining factors and existing problems in the domestic economy. The purpose of the article is to structure innovation in order to determine the priorities of financial regulation and its strategic orientations. Methods. To obtain the results in the study a number of general scientific and special methods were used: structural analysis, statistical methods, system analysis, scientific abstraction method. Results. The interpretation of the financial regulation of innovation activity as an agreed comprehensive legislative regulation of the use of budget and tax instruments is grounded in order to influence state institutions on the national innovation system functioning, innovation potential and innovative security in the country, aimed at strengthening competitiveness and establishing an innovative model of socio-economic development. The analysis of structural features of innovative activity of domestic business entities is carried out. The role of technological innovations (process and product) in the Ukrainian economy is revealed. The specifics of the introduction of non-technological innovations in the context of marketing and organizational are detected. The tendentious low role of product innovations in the overall structure of innovation activity of Ukrainian enterprises is identified, which poses a threat to the country's innovative security. It is argued that the priority of financial regulation should be the integration within the triangle of science-innovation-production. The emphasis is on the role of elements of innovation infrastructure (scientific parks, technological parks, innovation clusters) in increasing the efficiency of financial regulation of innovation activity. Conclusions. The prospects of further scientific research on the subject of research are primarily based on substantiating concrete decisions to increase the role of educational and scientific components in stimulating research and development as a pledge of innovative successes of enterprises in Ukraine.
39
Fazel, Hesham, André O. Laplume, and Etayankara Muralidharan. "Technological Innovation and Adopter Self-Construal." International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management 12, no. 04 (July 28, 2015): 1550016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/s0219877015500169.
Abstract:
In this paper, we theorize that individuals who value independence and distinctiveness identify more with social identities as a result of adopting sustaining technological innovations. Conversely, individuals who value interdependence may become more independent as a result of adopting disruptive technological innovations. We argue that successive adoptions of technological innovation may expand and contract the breadth of adopters' collective identities. We discuss the implications of this conceptual paper and suggest avenues for future research at the nexus of technological innovation and cultural change.
40
Murphy, John W., and Donald D. Davis. "Managing Technological Innovation." Contemporary Sociology 16, no. 6 (November 1987): 811. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2071541.
41
Sun, Yu, Zhaoyuan Yu, Ling Li, Yong Chen, Mikhail Yu Kataev, Haiqing Yu, and Hecheng Wang. "Technological Innovation Research." Journal of Global Information Management 29, no. 6 (November 2021): 1–22. http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/jgim.20211101.oa32.
Abstract:
The paper explores the relationship among technological innovation, technological trajectory transition, and firms’ innovation performance. Technological innovation is studied from the perspectives of innovation novelty and innovation openness. Technological trajectory transition is categorized into creative cumulative technological trajectory transition and creative disruptive technological trajectory transition. A structural equation model is developed and tested with data collected by surveying 366 Chinese firms. The results indicate that both innovation novelty and innovation openness positively affects creative cumulative technological trajectory transition as well as creative disruptive technological trajectory transition. Innovation openness and creative disruptive technological trajectory transition both positively affect firms’ innovation performance. However, neither innovation novelty nor creative cumulative technological trajectory transition positively affects firms’ innovation performance. Implications for managers and directions for future studies are discussed.
42
Lind, Mary R. "Technological innovation pull." International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management 2, no. 6 (2002): 584. http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/ijeim.2002.000504.
43
Gobeli, David H., and Warren B. Brown. "Technological Innovation Strategies." Engineering Management Journal 6, no. 1 (March 1994): 17–23. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10429247.1994.11414768.
44
Porter, Alan L. "Forecasting technological innovation." International Journal of Forecasting 11, no. 3 (September 1995): 493–94. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0169-2070(95)90033-0.
45
Preece, David. "Managing Technological Innovation." Technovation 21, no. 7 (July 2001): 463. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0166-4972(01)00012-8.
46
Bradshaw, Ralph A., and A. L. Burlingame. "Technological Innovation Revisited." Molecular & Cellular Proteomics 9, no. 11 (October 13, 2010): 2335–36. http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/mcp.e110.005447.
47
Dodgson, Mark. "Generating technological innovation." Research Policy 18, no. 5 (October 1989): 305–6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(89)90065-6.
48
Daim, T. U., D. F. Kocaoglu, and T. R. Anderson. "Exploring Technological Innovation." Journal of High Technology Management Research 21, no. 1 (January 2010): 1. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.hitech.2010.02.001.
49
Barbosa, Kennedy de Araújo, Marcos de Moraes Sousa, Jean Marc Nacife, and Sergio Souza Novak. "Innovations in courts: Validation of a scale of technological innovation." Revista de Gestão e Secretariado 13, no. 4 (December 30, 2022): 2314–36. http://dx.doi.org/10.7769/gesec.v13i4.1474.
Abstract:
The development of studies on technological innovations in the public sector, specifically in justice system, is still little explored in the literature. This article aimed to develop and validate a scale of technological innovation in the justice system during the period of the COVID-19 pandemic. Data collection procedures were carried out by means of questionnaires sent to 20.727 e-mails of civil servants and judges of the state courts of justice in Brazil. The relationships among the innovation variables that make up the technological innovation construct in the Brazilian judiciary were studied. The factor analyses resulted in the main factors listed by the respondents, as the innovative trend factor (IT); technological resources factor (TR); governance factor and its evidence (G); and innovation and technology factor (IT). For responses to the studies, descriptive statistical analysis was performed, and the innovative sensitivity and technological integration variables presented greater commonalities, and the two factors extracted explain 74% and 67% of the variance. After the descriptive statistical treatment, the confidence level was 99% and the error margin was 4.87%, resulting in a sample of 679 respondents.
50
Cho, Se Ho, and Hyun Gon Kim. "Intellectual property rights protection and technological innovation." Multinational Business Review 25, no. 4 (December 11, 2017): 350–68. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/mbr-04-2017-0019.
Abstract:
Purpose The purpose of this paper is to assess the role of firms’ internationalization on the relationship between intellectual property right (IPR) protection and their technological innovation. While recent studies provide a negative relationship between IPR protection and technological innovation, this paper argues that firm’s internationalization weaken the negative relationship. This research is a meaningful step to clarify the theoretical conflict and empirical ambiguity of the effect of IPR protection on technological innovations. Design/methodology/approach This paper empirically analyzes the theoretical arguments with 204 US firms, which registered their patents in the United States Patent and Trademark Office and have been listed in the Compustat database between 2007 and 2010. Findings The paper suggests that IPR protections brings more benefit to firms with high multinationality and are more export-oriented in terms of developing technological innovation, whereas the effects of international knowledge stock is unclear in the relationship between IPR protection and technological innovation. Research limitations/implications This study shows the effects of internationalization factors, which provide the benefits of cost efficiency and of more resource accessibility on the relationship between IPR protection regime and a firm’s technological innovation. The implication for policy makers and firm managers is that utilizing internationalization resources and capabilities is essential in developing their firms’ technological innovation under a strong IPR protection. Originality/value This paper enriches the literature of IPRs and offers the direction for future research on how a firm’s internationalization matters in its innovative activities under IPR protection.